PHIL 160 PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Underdetermination of theory by data
Underdetermination of theory by data
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Underdetermination of theory by data
Holism in testing
Underdetermination of theory by data
Holism in testing
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Underdetermination of theory by data
Holism in testing
Meaning holism
Underdetermination of theory by data
Holism in testing
Meaning holism
THEORYTHEORY
• What kind of stuff is in the world
• What kind of stuff is in the world• How that stuff behaves• How that stuff behaves
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
INDUCTIVE LOGICINDUCTIVE LOGIC
Narrow Inductivist Picture of Science:Narrow Inductivist Picture of Science:
Collect data from
experience
Collect data from
experience
Derive generalizatio
ns
Derive generalizatio
ns
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Form hypothesesForm hypotheses
Hempel’s Picture of Science:Hempel’s Picture of Science:
1. Find test implications.2. Set up test conditions.3. See what happens.
1. Find test implications.2. Set up test conditions.3. See what happens.
Test hypothesesTest hypotheses
(data + imagination)(data + imagination)
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
1. If H is true, will observe I under test conditions.
2. Set up test conditions.3. Observe not-I.
H is falseH is false
1. If H is true, will observe I under test conditions.
2. Set up test conditions.3. Observe not-I.
H is falseH is false
Test hypotheses - negative testTest hypotheses - negative test
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Problem of induction
Problem of induction
1. If H is true, will observe I under test conditions.
2. Set up test conditions.3. Observe not-I.
H is falseH is false
1. If H is true, will observe I under test conditions.
2. Set up test conditions.3. Observe not-I.
H is falseH is false
Test hypotheses - negative testTest hypotheses - negative test
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
1. If H1 and H2 and H3 and H4 and … are true, will observe I under test conditions.
2. Set up test conditions.3. Observe not-I.
H1 or H2 or H3 or H4 or … is false
1. If H1 and H2 and H3 and H4 and … are true, will observe I under test conditions.
2. Set up test conditions.3. Observe not-I.
H1 or H2 or H3 or H4 or … is false
Test group of hypotheses
Test group of hypotheses
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Individual hypotheses don’t always generate testable predictions.
H1: “Cadaveric matter causes childbed fever.”
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Need auxiliary hypotheses to generate testable predictions:
H1: Cadaveric matter causes childbed fever.H2: Cadaveric matter is transferred from cadavers to patients via hands, instruments.H3: Washing hands, instruments in chlorinated lime will remove or destroy cadaveric matter.
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Negative test - Negative test -
Test group of hypotheses
Test group of hypotheses
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Negative test - there is a problemSOMEWHERE in thegroup of hypotheses
Negative test - there is a problemSOMEWHERE in thegroup of hypotheses
Test group of hypotheses
Test group of hypotheses
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Some individual hypotheses are testable:
H: Mars has a triangular orbit.
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
1st law of motion: If there is no force acting on a body, the momentum of that body will remain constant.
1st law of motion: If there is no force acting on a body, the momentum of that body will remain constant.
Newton’s group of hypotheses
Newton’s group of hypotheses
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
2nd law of motion: If there is a force acting on a body, that body will accelerate by an amount directly proportional to the strength of the force and inversely proportional to its mass.
2nd law of motion: If there is a force acting on a body, that body will accelerate by an amount directly proportional to the strength of the force and inversely proportional to its mass.
Newton’s group of hypotheses
Newton’s group of hypotheses
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
3rd law of motion: If one body exerts a force on a second body, then the second body exerts a force on the first body that is equal in strength and opposite in direction.
3rd law of motion: If one body exerts a force on a second body, then the second body exerts a force on the first body that is equal in strength and opposite in direction.
Newton’s group of hypotheses
Newton’s group of hypotheses
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Law of universal gravitation: Any two bodies exert attractive forces on each other where the forces are in the direction of the line connecting the bodies and are proportional to the product of their masses divided by the square of the distance between them.
Law of universal gravitation: Any two bodies exert attractive forces on each other where the forces are in the direction of the line connecting the bodies and are proportional to the product of their masses divided by the square of the distance between them.
Newton’s group of hypotheses
Newton’s group of hypotheses
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
3 laws of motion + law of universal
gravitation
3 laws of motion + law of universal
gravitation
No testable predictions!No testable predictions!
Newton’s group of hypotheses
Newton’s group of hypotheses
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
3 laws of motion + law of universal
gravitation+ auxiliary hypotheses
about masses, positions of planets and sun
3 laws of motion + law of universal
gravitation+ auxiliary hypotheses
about masses, positions of planets and sun
Predictions of planets’ orbits
Predictions of planets’ orbits
Newton’s group of hypotheses
Newton’s group of hypotheses
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
But where?
But where?
Negative test - there is a problemSOMEWHERE in thegroup of hypotheses
Negative test - there is a problemSOMEWHERE in thegroup of hypotheses
Test group of hypotheses
Test group of hypotheses
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Bad prediction of Uranus’s orbit
Bad prediction of Uranus’s orbit
3 laws of motion + law of universal
gravitation+ auxiliary hypotheses
about masses, positions of planets and sun
3 laws of motion + law of universal
gravitation+ auxiliary hypotheses
about masses, positions of planets and sun
Newton’s group of hypotheses
Newton’s group of hypotheses
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Bad prediction of Uranus’s orbit
Bad prediction of Uranus’s orbit
3 laws of motion + law of universal
gravitation+ auxiliary hypotheses
about masses, positions of planets and sun
3 laws of motion + law of universal
gravitation+ auxiliary hypotheses
about masses, positions of planets and sun
Missing a planet?
Missing a planet?
Newton’s group of hypotheses
Newton’s group of hypotheses
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Astronomers changed auxiliary hypothesisabout how many planets, left Newton’s laws & UG unchanged.This fixed bad prediction of Uranus orbit.
New planet (Neptune) observed by telescope.
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
3 laws of motion + law of universal
gravitation+ auxiliary hypotheses
about masses, positions of planets and sun
3 laws of motion + law of universal
gravitation+ auxiliary hypotheses
about masses, positions of planets and sun
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Bad prediction of Mercury’s orbit
Bad prediction of Mercury’s orbit
Newton’s group of hypotheses
Newton’s group of hypotheses
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
First attempt: stick another planet in
(“Vulcan”) betweenMercury and Sun.
First attempt: stick another planet in
(“Vulcan”) betweenMercury and Sun.
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
No repeatable observations of this new planet.
No repeatable observations of this new planet.
First attempt: stick another planet in
(“Vulcan”) betweenMercury and Sun.
First attempt: stick another planet in
(“Vulcan”) betweenMercury and Sun.
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
No repeatable observations of this new planet.
(Possible aux. hypothesis:(Possible aux. hypothesis:the new planet is the new planet is
invisible!)invisible!)
No repeatable observations of this new planet.
(Possible aux. hypothesis:(Possible aux. hypothesis:the new planet is the new planet is
invisible!)invisible!)
First attempt: stick another planet in
(“Vulcan”) betweenMercury and Sun.
First attempt: stick another planet in
(“Vulcan”) betweenMercury and Sun.
3 laws of motion + law of universal
gravitation+ auxiliary hypotheses
about masses, positions of planets and sun
3 laws of motion + law of universal
gravitation+ auxiliary hypotheses
about masses, positions of planets and sun
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Bad prediction of Mercury’s orbit
Bad prediction of Mercury’s orbit
Bad theory?
Bad theory?
Newton’s group of hypotheses
Newton’s group of hypotheses
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Duhem says scientists must
rely on “good sense”
Duhem says scientists must
rely on “good sense”
No set rule for how to fix group of hypotheses that makes a bad prediction.
No set rule for how to fix group of hypotheses that makes a bad prediction.
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Holism in testing important in observations made with scientificinstruments.
Group includes hypotheses about themeasuring device.
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Theory predicts: room temp chickenis a good host for salmonella.
Test prediction with microscope.
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
In the group of hypotheses:
Theory about salmonella growth.Theory of the microscope.
Bad prediction could mean a problemwith either theory (or both)
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Quine: Hypotheses are tested in groupsand the group includes all humanknowledge claims (including meaningsof terms).
“Meaning holism”
Can’t test hypotheses in isolation, andchanges in one hypothesis can prompt changes throughout whole logical structureof the theory.
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
What does this have to do with the Twin Earth thought experiment?
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Is the stuff from Twin Earth water?
Devise observations that could helpyou distinguish water from not-water.
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Is the stuff from Twin Earth water?
For every test, performs identically to water.Thus, reasonable to conclude (1600)it is water.
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Is the stuff from Twin Earth water?
New test: elemental analysisWater from Earth: H2OStuff from Twin Earth: XYZ
But is Twin Earth stuff water?
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Is the stuff from Twin Earth water?Because of meaning holism, this depends on the choices you makein evaluating the group of hypotheses.
PHIL 160PHIL 160
1. Water is the stuff found in rivers, lakes, streams, and aqueducts that humans drink, cook with, bathe in, swim in, etc.
1. Water is the stuff found in rivers, lakes, streams, and aqueducts that humans drink, cook with, bathe in, swim in, etc.
PHIL 160PHIL 160
2. Water displays certain regular behaviors (boiling under certain specified conditions, freezing under certain specified conditions, dissolving particular amounts of certain substances, etc.).
2. Water displays certain regular behaviors (boiling under certain specified conditions, freezing under certain specified conditions, dissolving particular amounts of certain substances, etc.).
PHIL 160PHIL 160
3. Although water from the ocean, water from a stream, water from a well, rainwater, etc., may differ in their impurities (salt, mud, etc.), they all count as water; that is, the substance containing these different impurities is the same.
3. Although water from the ocean, water from a stream, water from a well, rainwater, etc., may differ in their impurities (salt, mud, etc.), they all count as water; that is, the substance containing these different impurities is the same.
PHIL 160PHIL 160
4. Water’s behavior is a result of what it is made of.
4. Water’s behavior is a result of what it is made of.
PHIL 160PHIL 160
5. If two samples display different microstructure (e.g., different elemental composition), they must be samples of different substances.
5. If two samples display different microstructure (e.g., different elemental composition), they must be samples of different substances.
PHIL 160PHIL 160
6. Substances with different microstructures will display different macroscopic behavior.
6. Substances with different microstructures will display different macroscopic behavior.
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
21
3
4
5
6
Group of hypothese
s
Group of hypothese
s
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
2 1
34
Drop theseDrop these
21
3
5
6
4Group of hypothese
s
Group of hypothese
s
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Add “Water is H2O”
Add “Water is H2O”
1
4
5
6
3
2
Drop theseDrop these
Group of hypothese
s
Group of hypothese
s
PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Courtesy of the Frances Loeb Library, Graduate School of Design, Harvard
University
Courtesy of the Frances Loeb Library, Graduate School of Design, Harvard
University
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
Courtesy of the Frances Loeb Library, Graduate School of Design, Harvard
University
Courtesy of the Frances Loeb Library, Graduate School of Design, Harvard
University
PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160PHIL 160
“Any statement can be held to be true come what may, if we make drastic enough adjustments elsewhere in the system.”
“Any statement can be held to be true come what may, if we make drastic enough adjustments elsewhere in the system.”