Overview of the H.264/AVC Video Coding Standard T. Wiegand, G.J. Sullivan, G. Bjøntegaard and A. Luthra, IEEE Transaction on Circuits and Systems for Video.

Overview of the H.264/AVC Video Coding Standard

T. Wiegand, G.J. Sullivan, G. Bjøntegaard and A. Luthra, IEEE Transaction on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Vol. 13, no. 7, Jul. 2003.

Presented by Peter

H.264/AVC

Latest Video coding standard Basic design architecture similar to MPEG-x

or H.26x Better compression efficiency

Up to 50% in bit rate savings Subjective quality is better Advance functional element

History of H.264/AVC

Initiate by the Video Coding Experts Group (VCEG) in early 1998

Previous name H.26L Target to double the coding efficiency First draft was adopted in Oct. of 1999 In Dec. of 2001, VCEF and the Moving Pictures

Experts Group (MPEG) formed a Joint Video Team (JVT)

Approved by the ITU-T as H.264 and ISO/IEC as International Standard 14496-10 (MPEG-4 part 10) Advanced Video Codec (AVC) in Mar. 2003

Timeline of Video Development

Design Features Highlights

Features for enhancement of prediction Directional spatial prediction for intra coding Variable block-size motion compensation with small block

size Quarter-sample-accurate motion compensation Motion vectors over picture boundaries Multiple reference picture motion compensation Decoupling of referencing order form display order Decoupling of picture representation methods from picture

referencing capability Weighted prediction Improved “skipped” and “direct” motion inference In-the-loop deblocking filtering

Design Features Highlights

Features for improved coding efficiency Small block-size transform Exact-match inverse transform Short word-length transform Hierarchical block transform Arithmetic entropy coding Context-adaptive entropy coding

Design Features Highlights

Features for robustness to data errors/losses Parameter set structure NAL unit syntax structure Flexible slice size Flexible macroblock ordering (FMO) Arbitrary slice ordering (ASO) Redundant pictures Data Partitioning SP/SI synchronization/switching pictures

Directional spatial prediction for intra coding Intra prediction is to predict the texture in current block using

the pixel samples from neighboring blocks Intra prediction for 44 and 16 16 blocks are supported in

H.264

Figs. from [2]

Directional spatial prediction for intra coding - 4 4 example

Mode 7 is selected Figs. from [2]

Directional spatial prediction for intra coding – 16 16 example

Mode 3 is selected

Figs. from [2]

Variable block-size motion compensation with small block size Partitioned in 2 stages In the 1st stage, determine first 4

modes 1616, 168, 816, 88

If mode 4 (88) is chosen, further partition into smaller blocks for every 88 block 84, 48, 44

At most 16 motion vectors may be transmitted for a 1616 macroblock

Large computational complexity to determine the modes

Fig. from [3]

Variable block-size motion compensation with small block size

Multiple reference picture motion compensation – P Slices More than one prior coded

picture can be used as reference

for MC prediction Reference index parameter is

transmitted for each MC 1616, 168, 816 or 88

For smaller blocks within the 88 use 1 reference index

P macroblock can also be coded in P-Skip type

Fig. from [1]

Multiple reference picture motion compensation – B Slices Utilize two distinct lists of reference pictures Four different types of inter-picture predict

List 0, list 1, bi-predictive, and direct prediction Bi-predictive

weighted average of MC list 0 and list 1 Direct prediction

Inferred from previously transmitted syntax Either list 0 or list 1 prediction or bi-predictive

Similar macroblock partitioning as P slices is utilized B_Skip mode is supported

Small block-size transform

Transformation is applied on 44 blocks Close to 44 DCT transform Inverse-transform mismatches are avoided The transform matrix is given as

Short word-length transform

Post-scaling matrix in forward transform Pre-scaling matrix in inverse transform Only integer operations and shifting are needed in transformation and

quantization

Hierarchical block transform

For macroblock is coded in 1616 Intra mode and chrominance blocks

DC coefficients are further grouped and transformed

Hadamard transform is used for chrominance block

Intended for coding of smooth areas

Figs. from [4]

Some results – Foreman QCIF @ 10 Hz

Fig. from [1]

Some results – Foreman CIF @ 30 Hz

Fig. from [1]

Profiles

3 profiles - Baseline, Main and Extended Profile

15 levels Picture size: up to 250M pixels/s Bit Rate: up to 240M bps

Potential Applications

Baseline (low latency) H.320 conversational video services 3GPP conversational H.324/M services H.323 with IP/RTP 3GPP using IP/RTP and SIP 3GPP streaming using IP/RTP and RTSP

Main (moderate latency) Modified H.222.0/MPEG-2 Broadcast via satellite, cable, terrestrial or DSL DVD and VOD

Extended Streaming over wired Internet

Any (no requirement on latency) 3GPP MMS Video mail

References

1. T. Wiegand, G.J. Sullivan, G. Bjøntegaard and A. Luthra, “Overview of the H.264/AVC Video Coding Standard,” IEEE Transaction on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Vol. 13, no. 7, Jul. 2003.

2. I.E.G. Richardson, “H.264/MPEG4 Part 10: Intra Prediction,” available at http://www.vcodex.com

3. I.E.G. Richardson, “H.264/MPEG4 Part 10: Inter Prediction,” available at http://www.vcodex.com

4. I.E.G. Richardson, “H.264/MPEG4 Part 10: Transform and Quantization,” available at http://www.vcodex.com