Overview of Damage Assessments Ron W. Przybylinski Science and Operations Officer NWS St. Louis
Dec 17, 2015
Overview of Damage Assessments
Ron W. PrzybylinskiScience and Operations Officer
NWS St. Louis
Outline
Damage Patterns (Tornadic and Downburst (Microbursts)
Brief review of the Enhanced Fujita (EF) Scale
Example – “You Make the Call” What can I do for you. What
can you do for me.
Why do damage Why do damage assessments?assessments? Determine tornado
intensity
Estimate wind speeds
Storm track, width
Determine warning response
Heard this Before?Heard this Before?
It sounded like a freight train The trees (or whatever) are twisted Only a tornado could do this much
damage I felt my ears “pop”
Tornadic Damage
Convergence pattern – arrows pointing to the center axis of the tornadic damage path (Red).
From Dr. Ted Fujita – Univ. of Chicago
June 10 2003 – tornadic damage two miles NNW of Nashville IL – weak tornado.
BAMEX Project 2003
House trailer damage from a violent tornado –2:00 am CST
November 6 2007 Evansville IN.
Eastbrook Mobile Home Park – southeast of Evansville Indiana
View from a plane viewing SE - Eastbrook Mobile Home Park
Multiple Vortex Tornado
Multiple Vortex pattern – the strongest winds often occur with this type of ground pattern (suction vortices) .
Remains of a corn field from a violent tornado
Are you able to observe part of a convergent pattern ?
Downburst clusters associated with bow echoes
Classic example of a microburst – starburst pattern
Small part of a downburst cluster over southern Clinton County Illinois – July 21 2006
Characteristic Tornado Downburst
Aspect RatioAspect Ratio Long & thin Short & wide
Damage gradientDamage gradient High Low
Trajectories of Trajectories of debrisdebris
Narrow and convergent
Broad and divergent
Appearance of Appearance of damagedamage
Chopped up, chaotic
Laid out neatly
Visual clues from Visual clues from groundground
Swirls, mud splattered on walls
No swirls, no mud
Visual clues from Visual clues from aircraftaircraft
Vortex mark Starburst pattern
Damage characteristics we look for:
Introduction to the Enhanced Fujita (EF) scale
Dr. Ted Fujita (1971) developed the Fujita scale to provide a method to rate the intensity of tornadoes.
However after 33 years of using the Fujita scale, users have found many limitations to this scale (e.g. lack of damage indicators).
In many cases NWS personnel would over estimate the wind speeds with tornadoes.
Enhanced Fujita (EF) scale
Steering committee (23 members) developed the following:
Identify “Damage Indicators.” Correlate appearance of damage
to wind speed Preserved the historical data base Seek additional input from users
EF Scale vs. Traditional Fujita Scale Wind Speed Ranges
Fujita Scale wind Fujita Scale wind mphmph EF Scale wind mphEF Scale wind mph
3-Second Gust3-Second Gust 3-Second Gust3-Second Gust
F0F0 45 - 7845 - 78 EF0EF0 ≤ ≤ 8585
F1F1 79 - 11779 - 117 EF1EF1 86 – 11086 – 110
F2F2 118 - 161118 - 161 EF2EF2 110 – 135110 – 135
F3F3 162 - 209162 - 209 EF3EF3 136 – 165136 – 165
F4F4 210 - 261210 - 261 EF4EF4 166 – 200166 – 200
F5F5 262 - 317262 - 317 EF5EF5 ≥ ≥ 200200
28 Damage Indicators
EF Scale Development
Each DI has several Degrees of Damage (DOD) Range from no damage to total
destruction Arranged in order of increasing damage
One-and Two-Family Residences (FR12)
Typical Construction: Asphalt shingles, tile, slate or metal roof
covering Flat, gable, hip, mansard or mono-sloped roof or
combination thereof Plywood/OSB or wood plank roof deck Prefabricated wood trusses or wood joists and
rafter construction Brick veneer, wood panels, stucco, EIFS, vinyl or
metal siding Wood or metal stud walls, concrete blocks or
insulating concrete panels Attached single or double garage
One-and Two-Family Residences (FR12)
One-and Two-Family Residences Degree
of Damage (DODs)
DOD Damage DescriptionExp
(mph)
LB (mph
)
UB (mph
)
1 Threshold of visible damage 65 53 80
2 Loss of roof covering material (<20%), gutters and/or awning; loss of vinyl or metal siding 79 63 97
3 Broken glass in doors and windows 96 79 114
4 Uplift of roof deck and loss of significant roof covering material (>20%); collapse of chimney; garage doors collapse inward or outward; failure of porch or carport 97 81 116
5 Entire house shifts off foundation 121 103 141
6 Large sections of roof structure removed; most walls remain standing 122 104 142
7 Exterior walls collapsed 132 113 153
8 Most walls collapsed, except small interior rooms 152 128 173
9 All walls collapsed 170 142 198
10 Total destruction of entire building, slab swept clean 200 165 220
One-and Two-Family Residences
FR12: DOD4: Uplift of roof deck and loss of roof covering (>20%); garage door collapses outward (LB 81 mph; UB 116 mph; Exp 97 mph)
One-and Two-Family Residences
FR12: DOD7: Top floor (First floor in this case) exterior walls collapsed. (LB 113 mph; UB 150 mph; Exp 132 mph).
One-and Two-Family Residences
FR12: DOD10: Total destruction of entire building(LB 165 mph; UB 220 mph; Exp 200 mph).
Recommended steps for assessing tornado damage
Conduct a survey (aerial if possible) Select several damage indicators (trees,
buildings, power poles, etc…) that tend to indicate the highest wind in the damage path
Assign an EF-scale to individual DIs – document Rate the tornado intensity by applying the
highest rated DI, provided there is supporting evidence of similar damage nearby.
Document the basis for assigning the EF-Scale, and record other pertinent data related to the event
Structures’ Response to Structures’ Response to WindWind
Type Design Orientation of structure to the
winds The upstream terrain Duration and gustiness of the wind Missiles
Pressure on the building’s interior increases, resulting in additional outward forces. That is why opening windows is not a good idea.
Failure Points
Rafter/top plate Roof joist/top
plate
Wall stud/bottom plate
Wall/foundation
Look For ReinforcementsLook For Reinforcements
You make the call
Large Industrial building
Another Image
Remains of a corn field
What can I do to help you out?
What can you do to help me out?