Overview of ASW Process

Overview of ASW Process

5 Rating Categories

1 65432Demonstrate Leadership

Establish Environment

KnowContent

Facilitate Learning

Reflect on Practice

Contribute

to Academic

Success

3 Rating Categories

Not Demonstrated

Developing

Proficient

Accomplished

Distinguished

Effectiveness Status NC Educator Evaluation System

Overview of Standard 6

Contribute to

Academic Success

End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) tests

6 NC Final Exams

6 Career Technical Education Assessment

6 Analysis of Student Work

K-3 Checkpoints6

6

Analysis of Student Work

6 Analysis of Student Work

Contribute

to Academic

Success

In 2014-2015, ASW is the Standard 6 measure for teachers in Advanced Placement, Arts Education, Healthful Living, International Baccalaureate, and World Languages.

Growth is based on student work submitted by teachers and rated by content experts in a “blind review” process.

Overview: Analysis of Student Work ASW Process

ASW Process: A Quick Guide

Teaching Context

• Screen shot

Determining Participation

1. If 60% of an educator’s classes are in ASW subject areas, then the educator must participate in both ASW and any other Standard 6 measure covering the remaining classes. 2. If 60% of an educator’s classes are not in ASW identified areas, then the teacher is not required to participate in ASW.

Principal receives a notification once a teacher’s schedule has been validated. The principal will then log into the Online Platform to confirm that the schedule is correct.

Principal’s Input

Class Selection

Beginning in 2014 – 2015, the online platform will select the classes in which the teacher must collect artifacts.

Objectives:Using the Strands and Standards guidance charts, the teacher will choose 5 objectives.

Objective Selection

Principal meets with the teacher to confirm that the 5 objectives chosen use the parameters in the Strands & Standards Guidance Chart

Some examples of meetings:• PDPs• teacher meetings

Principal’s Input

Teacher decisions needed to compile a Timelapse Artifact (TA):a) A specific objective

b) Sample type• Individual Student

or

• Whole Class

c) Collection Method

d) Samples from Point 1 and Point 2

e) Context

5 Timelapse Artifacts

Time passes

Teachers Collect Work Samples for Timelapse Artifacts

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

TA 1

Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Individual Student Work Samples

Online platform will select3 students

The TA will be compiled using the Individual Student Work Samples from these selected students.

Student Selection

Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Individual Student Work Samples

If a student work sample is unavailable, that student will be reshuffled and another student will be selected.

Student Selection

TA 1

TA 1

Principal’s Input

The Principal is notified when a reshuffle is used by a teacher.

Context for 1st work sample in each Timelapse Artifact

How does this artifact show where the studentis in relation to the chosen clarifying objective?

Upload Evidence

How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective?

This artifact was created using an 8th grade Healthful Living Health Education Class containing 32 students before instruction on the objective began. In this video, the student did not show proper technique in the their performance of CPR in the following ways.1. The students body position has him sitting on the victims waist. 2. The hands have been placed separately on the victims upper chest.3. The compressions given are of insufficient depth and are given too slow.4. The elbows are bending during the compression.

Context for Growth in each Timelapse Artifact

Describe the growth that occurred between Points 1 and 2.

Upload Evidence

Describe the growth that occurred between Points 1 and 2.

CPR performed with the technique in video #1 was inadequate and would not have given the victim an opportunity to survive. The technique in video #2 would provide blood flow and oxygen to give the victim a chance of survival

All 5 Timelapse Artifacts will be uploaded to the online platformas the teacher’sEvidence Collectionfor the school year.

TA 3Student

TA 4Student

TA 5Whole Class

TA 1 Student

TA 2 Whole Class

Upload Evidence

The Evidence Collection will be reviewed by 2 content area specialists.

Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

Blind Review

ED M

Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

If the category ratings from the two reviewers are not the same, the Evidence Collection is automatically sent to a 3rd reviewer for an additional review to get a rating for that year.

M

Reviewer #3

Blind Review

E

An educator receives an Effectiveness Status when he or she has 3 years of their own data for Standard 6

Effectiveness Status

3 Years of Combined Data for Standard 6

6 6 6Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

Standard Standard Standard

Questions about Educator Effectiveness, NCEES or ASWVisitwww.ncpublicschools.org/effectiveness-model

or http://ncees.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/NCEES+Wiki

or

ASW Wiki at http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/ You can also email questions to

[email protected] for Healthful Living

[email protected] for the Arts

[email protected] for World Languages

[email protected] for AP/IB

[email protected] for Course Codes