Top Banner
Developing Effective A&E Slating, Selection & Fee Negotiation Skills for Federally-Funded Transportation Projects May 2012 David Hyder, P.E., High Point MPO Diane Wilson, Capitol MPO Myra Immings, FTA TRO-04
31

Overview

Feb 22, 2016

Download

Documents

connie

Developing Effective A&E Slating, Selection & Fee Negotiation Skills for Federally-Funded Transportation Projects May 2012 David Hyder , P.E., High Point MPO Diane Wilson, Capitol MPO Myra Immings, FTA TRO-04 . Overview. Introduction: “Houston, we have a problem . . . ” - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Overview

Developing Effective A&E Slating, Selection & Fee Negotiation Skills for

Federally-Funded Transportation Projects

May 2012

David Hyder, P.E., High Point MPODiane Wilson, Capitol MPO

Myra Immings, FTA TRO-04

Page 2: Overview

2

Overview

• Introduction: “Houston, we have a problem . . . ”• Problem Statement -- developed w/ Stakeholder Input • Scoping -- differentiating project from A&E scope• Slating Process• Selection Process• Independent Cost Estimation (ICE)• A&E Fee Negotiation• Preview of Follow-on Topics for later sessions

Page 3: Overview

3

Definitions• A&E:

– architect and/or engineering firms, including but not limited to, designers, environmental specialists and site investigation consultants; term may refer to any tier of contractor/sub-contractor

• Scoping: – determination of parameters of an action; term may apply to either

project or A&E contract

• Slating: – “short-listing” and prioritizing prospective A&E firms whose written

statements of qualifications appear to fit well with identified skills, experience, level of personnel and availability required to perform the project scope

Page 4: Overview

4

Definitions• Independent Cost Estimate (ICE):

– the cost estimate for either project or A&E contract developed by the contracting agency without input from any prospectively slated/selected A&E

• Selection: – process through which slated firms are interviewed and negotiated-with

culminating in offer and acceptance of an A&E contract

Page 5: Overview

5

Significant Considerations When Determining Whether to Use an A&E or to Perform Design Work In-House

• Does the contracting agency have In-House skills available to perform the work?

• Does the contracting agency have the A&E contracting skills available to supervise A&E design (including planning and NEPA documentation, etc. as indicated in A&E Scope)?

• While the A&E is contracted by an agency, the A&E is not an extension of the contracting agency’s staff in some specific respects:

– A&E does not enjoy direct liaison with State and Federal agencies– Doctrine of Constructive Change– Authority-Responsibility Dichotomy

Page 6: Overview

6

Skills Required for Effective A&E Contracting are Different From the Skills Required to Perform Design In-House

Performing Design• Project Scoping• Project Design Scheduling• Project Construction

Scheduling• Design and Construction

Cost Estimating• Project Design Team

Selection• Quality Control Plan• Design Performance• Interagency Coordination• After-action Reporting

Contracting Design• A&E Scoping & Project

Scoping• A&E Slating• A&E Selection• Independent Cost

Estimation• A&E Fee Negotiation• Quality Assurance Plan• A&E Contract Administration

– Change Order Administration– Interagency Consultation– Evaluation of Deliverables– Validation for Payment– Close-out– After-action Reporting

Page 7: Overview

7

Contracting Agency Capacity • An agency cannot contract effectively for performance of services and

deliverables it has not the professional capacity In-House to evaluate– Litmus test: If the agency has the professional capacity (experience) to

accomplish the design In-House, it very likely has the skill to evaluate the performance of an A&E doing that same work

• Interagency Partners may be available to a limited extent to assist in scope development and evaluation of deliverables; this should be verified prior to entering into A&E contracting

– Metropolitan Planning Organization staff– State Department of Transportation staff– Federal Partner agencies (FHWA, FTA, EPA) staff

• It may be necessary to contract a second A&E firm to write an A&E project scope and/or evaluate deliverables

– Any firm preparing a scope is ineligible to perform the work delineated by that scope

Page 8: Overview

8

Contracting Agency’s Role

• A&E Scoping –– describes what/when the A&E is to perform and deliverables

• A&AE Slating and Selection• Independent Cost Estimation – time and $$$• A&E Contract Negotiation• Quality Assurance Plan• Contract Administration and Close-out• After-action documentation: A&E’s “report card” • Agency Performance or Supervision of A&E Performance of:

• Project Problem Statement Development• Project Purpose and Need Statement Development• Interagency Coordination• Public Involvement Activities

Page 9: Overview

9

Scoping• Differentiate Project Scope from A&E Contract Scope

– Project scope sets the extents of the study, design or construction to be accomplished (e.g. construct an intermodal facility or greenway)

– A&E contract scope sets the parameters of the A&E level of effort, personnel participation and deliverables including performance schedule; refers to project scope as context (fixed-price vehicle)

• Elements of an A&E Scope: –project scope (context), –types of skills and levels of expertise required, –description of ancillary tasks, –time for performance, and –description of deliverables

Page 10: Overview

10

A&E Scope vs. Project ScopeArchitect-Engineer Scope• Feasibility Study• Permitting• Design• PS&E documentation• FTA New Starts documentation• Preliminary FFGA input• Site Investigation (ESA)• NEPA Documentation

– CE, EA, EIS (w/draft findings)

– Public Involvement

Project Scope• Building program for:

– a structure (facility/building)– a bridge– a commuter or light rail line – a bus rapid transit guideway– a greenway– a road– an interchange

Page 11: Overview

11

Scoping Exercise:

• Using a given simplified project scope, compose a brief, cogent A&E contract scope (10 minutes)

• Simplified Project Scope: (Hyder)

Page 12: Overview

12

Slating and Selection Process• Two-Step Process

– Slating entails a panel of qualified professionals “short-listing” eligible candidates based upon their submittals of statements of qualification including:

• detailed descriptions of successful projects and • education/experience of in-house forces as well as • education/experience of lower-tier prospective sub-contractor resources

– Selection is based upon interview with “slated” A&Es followed by successful fee negotiations

• Brooks Act PL 92-582 (1972)-- added Title IX to Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 requiring A&E services to be based upon

qualification rather than price

Reference: Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 36

Page 13: Overview

13

Slating Checklist• Review Federal and State Requirements

– conform to the more stringent or identify funding limitations based upon conformity

• Review problem statement and project scope – ascertain A&E skills required

• Develop the A&E Scope

• Determine weighted selection criteria

• Issue Request for Qualification (RFQ) – based upon technical qualification, experience, interest and availability to

perform the design services demanded by the project scope

Page 14: Overview

14

Slating Checklist• Review Responsive and Responsible statements of qualifications submittals

• Check performance history with former project sponsors

• Consider current agency Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goals

• Weigh geographic equity in light of advantage of local A&Es

• Evaluate selection history – “spread the wealth” or “take the high ground”

• Create a prioritized short list (slate) of A&Es to interview

Page 15: Overview

15

Types of Skills to Consider While Slating

• Types of Skills and Related Factors: – Ability to perform the specific type of design sought– Writing/Editing Skills– Ability to effectively identify, analyze and document potential adverse

impacts on the physical and social environment– Familiarity with environmental laws and regulations of cognizant

agencies– Ability to work cooperatively with specifically-identified internal and

external (interagency) partners and/or the public– Ability to perform to schedule (including potential change orders)– Flexibility (value according to assessment of likelihood of change) – Depth of organization (redundancy capacity)

Page 16: Overview

16

Types of Skills to Consider While Slating

• Prioritize and Weight Relative Value of Skills in order to best evaluate needs

• Note that these are essentially the same skills to consider when deciding to contract rather than perform design In-House

Page 17: Overview

17

Slating Exercise • In small groups:

– Review the Statements of Qualifications provided in light of the A&E Scope (school solution) provided

– Consider the skills and conditions most desirable in the A&E for this project

– Determine a prioritized slate of three firms to refer for selection screening interviews

(10-15 minutes)

Page 18: Overview

18

Selection Screening InterviewsWhat to look for during screening interviews:

A&E’s comprehension of the project scopeA&E’s comprehension of the A&E scopeA&E’s capability to perform skill sets needed

• depth of organization• adequacy of lower-tier sub-contractors• evaluate degree of “puff” in statement of qualifications

Potential/demonstrated compatibility with array of partners Appropriate degree of flexibility in A&E’s extended organizationAvailability in terms of commitments to other project endeavors

Page 19: Overview

19

Mock Selection Interview• Based upon the Statement of Qualifications submitted by the

slated firm, together with a provided scenario:– interview the principal and his support team to ascertain that firm’s

readiness and capacity to exhibit the skills required to perform to the given A&E scope

• A&E Team will be provided with a synopsis of factors relevant to its ability to perform

• Contracting Agency Team will be provided with the weighted criteria for evaluation of the A&E firm

(15-20 minutes)

Page 20: Overview

20

Independent Cost Estimation (ICE)

• Estimate developed without input from a prospective A&E

• Estimate based upon contracting agency’s I-H professional expertise, experience and/or that agency’s historical records for successful procurements of A&E services

• Inexperienced contracting agencies may:– Hire a third party A&E to develop the ICE– Consult with colleagues who have developed expertise in

similar procurements– Rely upon R. L. Means Cost Estimation Guides or other

published resources

Page 21: Overview

21

What Kinds of Costs are in an ICE?• Indirect Costs

– Allowable Field Office and Home Office Overheads– Allowability based upon calculation performed by federal agency which funds

most $$$• Direct and Costs for Labor and Deliverables

– Level of Effort (hours)– Hard deliverables: printing, models, renderings, model runs/output

• Level of effort (LOE) – Estimate of labor hours attributable to staff X hourly rates– Principal, expert, journeyman, apprentice, clerical, administrative

• Two interrelated types of costs require estimation:– Monetary costs: consideration for task completion– Temporal costs: consideration for time/schedule requirements– Both require contingency reserves based upon risk assessment

Page 22: Overview

22

Level of Effort (LOE) Estimation• LOE Estimates for different types of work in terms of

hours allocated for specific worker for:– Executive Meetings– Internal Meetings– Interagency Meetings Research– Consultation with Lower-Tier Sub-contractors– Consultation with Environmental Experts, Resource Agencies

and Interest Groups– Consultation with the Public/Public Involvement Activities– Field Investigation– Travel– Rework pursuant to refining drafts per review comments

Page 23: Overview

23

ICE Considers Both Cost and Price Cost, Price and Fee are Different

• Cost: Aggregation of negotiated nan-hours X negotiated hourly rates + allowable travel costs +allowable materials costs

• Price: Cost + + allowable direct and indirect overheads + negotiated profit

• A&E Fee: Initially-contracted price + renegotiated contingencies brought about through additive change orders – renegotiated price elements determined by deductive change orders

• Actual Expense to Public: A&E fee plus expenditures for salaries of interagency partners at MPO, DOT, FHWA, FTA

Page 24: Overview

24

A&E Fee Negotiations

• Fee negotiations begin with the firm ranked first during the selection Process

• Base negotiations on the separate ICEs each party brings to the negotiation table

• Realize that the same entity is not necessarily valued the same by both sides—explore what each task is worth to each party (orange analogy)

Page 25: Overview

25

A&E Fee Negotiations• Usually most significant discussions surround:

– understanding of the scopes, – interaction between the A&E and the contracting agency, – who will be accomplishing tasks and how many hours tasks will require

(rather than hourly rates, overhead rates and profit factors)

• Negotiate change order costs as part of the initial negotiation

• Experienced A&E firms who submit on projects known to be federally-funded usually understand cost allowability and allocability rules, but it is good to confirm during negotiations

Page 26: Overview

26

Mock A&E Fee Negotiation

• A&E team will be provided with:– an ICE representing its initial position – information on those areas which are “soft” (most negotiable), – a principal-authorized lower limit for an acceptable fee

• Contracting agency team will be provided with:– an ICE representing the agency’s initial evaluation of cost and price, – an indication of the agency’s posture with respect to change order negotiation– indication of the full amount available for obligation to an A&E fee for the project

(20-25 minutes)

Page 27: Overview

27

After-Action ReportingWas the A&E “All Hat and No Cattle”?

• Would your agency hire this A&E again to do similar work to that scoped in this contract?

– If not, would your agency hire this A&E to do other types of design work?

• What were the A&E’s strengths and weaknesses that impacted the quality of the design work?

– Did your agency’s slating and selection process succeed or fail in evaluating the right skill-set required for the work?

• Was A&E performance better or worse than anticipated?– In what respect:

• On Time (including performance according to negotiated Change Orders)?• Competent Deliverables?• Appropriate Compatibility with In-House Project Manager and Interagency

Staffs?

Page 28: Overview

28

Preview of Next Topics• Interagency Consultation

• A&E Contract Administration– Validation of invoices for payment & Prompt Payment Act – Progress payments– Retainage– Evaluation of Incentive Fees/Fee Structures– Renegotiation/Change Order Negotiation– Terminations for Convenience and Default

• Authority/Responsibility Dichotomy

• Quality Assurance and Quality Control for A&E Contracts

• Using lessons learned in future A&E contracting

Page 29: Overview

29

References• Federal Acquisition Regulation, Part 36• FTA Circular 4220.1F Third Party Contracting• Brooks Act PL 92-586 (1972)• Herb Cohen:

– You Can Negotiate Anything– Negotiating the Game– Herbcohenonline.com– [email protected]

Page 31: Overview

Federal Transit

Administration

www.fta.dot.gov