OVA & OTA VA & OTA OVA & OTA VA & OTA 1 Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola
OOVAVA--OperationalOperational VoltageVoltage AmplifierAmplifier• Ideally a voltage-controlled voltage source
Typically contains an output stage that can drive “arbitrary” loads including small• Typically contains an output stage that can drive “arbitrary” loads, including smallresistances• Predominantly used for board-level circuitry
OOTATA--Operational Transconductance AmplifierOperational Transconductance Amplifier• Ideally a voltage controlled current source• Typically restricted to capacitive (or moderate resistive) loads• Primarily used in integrated circuits• Primarily used in integrated circuits
•The op-amp (OVA and OTA) is a fundamental building block in Mixed Signal design.• Employed profusely in data converters, filters, sensors, drivers etc.•Continued scaling in CMOS technology has been challenging the established
di f d i
2Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola
paradigms for op-amp design.
•With downscaling in channel length (L) Transition frequency increases (morespeed)p )Open-loop gain reduces (lower intrinsicgain)Supply voltage is scaled down (lowerheadroom)headroom)VDD is scaling down but VTH is almostconstant (Design headroom is shrinkingfaster))Random offsets due to devicemismatches
1THV WL
WL
•Integration of Analog into Nano-CMOS?Design low-VDD op-amps.Design low VDD op amps. Replace vertical stacking (cascoding) by horizontal cascading of gain stagesExplore more effective op-amp compensation techniques.Offset tolerant designs.Al i i i d l t t k ith th di it l t dAlso minimize power and layout area to keep up with the digital trend.Better power supply noise rejection (PSRR)
•Even if we employ wide-swing biasing for low-voltage designs, three- or higher stage opampswill be indispensable in realizing large open-loop DC gain.
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola3
will be indispensable in realizing large open loop DC gain.
The op amp (operational amplifier) is a high gain, dc coupled amplifier designed to beused with negative feedback to precisely define a closed loop transfer function.
The basic requirements for an op amp:q p p• Sufficiently large gain (the accuracy of the signal processing determines this)• Differential inputs• Frequency characteristics that permit stable operation when negative feedback is applied
Other req irementsOther requirements:• High input impedance• Low output impedance• High speed/frequencyg p q y
OP AMP CHARACTERIZATION•Linear and Static Characterization of the CMOS Op AmpA model for a nonideal op amp that includes some of the linear, static nonidealities:
4Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola
whereRid = differential input resistanceCid = differential input capacitanceRicm = common mode input resistanceRicm = common mode input capacitanceVOS = input-offset voltageCMRR = common-mode rejection ratio (when v1=v2 an output results)CMRR common mode rejection ratio (when v1 v2 an output results)
= voltage-noise spectral density (mean-square volts/Hertz)
Linear and Dynamic Characteristics of the Op Amp
2ne
Differential and common-mode frequency response:
1 21 2 2out v c
V s V sV s A s V s V s A s
Differential-frequency response:
0
1 2 31 1 1 ...
vv
AA ss s sp p p
1 2 3p p p
i ip
5Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola
Other Characteristics of the Op Amp•Power supply rejection ratio (PSRR):
•Input common mode range (ICMR):ICMR = the voltage range over which the input common-mode signal can varyICMR = the voltage range over which the input common-mode signal can vary
without influence the differential performance
•Slew rate (SR): maximum current available to charge and discharge a capacitanceSR = output voltage rate limit of the op amp
•Settling time (Ts): the time needed for the output of the output of the op amp to reach a finalvalue value when excited by a small signal (SR is a large-signal phenomenon) Small-signalvalue value when excited by a small signal (SR is a large-signal phenomenon). Small-signalsettling time can be completely determined from the location of the poles and zeros in thesmall-signal equivalent circuit.
6Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola
OP AMP CATEGORIZATIONAmplifiers generaly consist of a cascade of V-I (transconductance stage) or I-V (load stage)
•Classification of CMOS Op Amps
7Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola
Output configuration– Single ended
Differential– Differential• Predominantly used for integrated high-performance or high precision amplifiers• Requires common mode feedback circuit
– Class-A• Output cannot source/sink currents larger than quiescent point bias current
– Class-AB• Output can provide large drive currents “on demand”
– Dynamic comparator-based– Dynamic, comparator-based• Still a research topic
Two-stage single ended Miller CMOS OTA
8Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola
•Classical two-stage CMOS op amp broken into voltage-to-current and current-to-voltagestages:
•Folded cascode CMOS op amp broken into stages:
9Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola
COMPENSATION OF OP AMPS•Objective of compensation is to achieve stable operation when negative feedback is appliedaround the op amp. L s A s F s L s A s F s
1A s
CLG sA s F s
0 0 0 01dB dB dBA j F j L j
0 0
0
2 arg
2 argM dB dB
dB
A j F j
L j
11Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola
Why Do We Want Good Stability?•Consider the step response of second-order system which closely models the closed-loopgain of the op amp connected in unity gain.g p p y g
•A “good” step response is one that quickly reaches its final value.•Therefore, we see that phase margin should be at least 45° and preferably 60° or larger.
(A rule of thumb for satisfactory stability is that there should be less than three(A rule of thumb for satisfactory stability is that there should be less than three rings.)•Note that good stability is not necessarily the quickest rise time.
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola12
Root Locus1st order feedback system
•A so-called “root locus” plot shows the movement of the poles in the s plane as we vary thelow-frequency loop gain T0
2nd order feedback system2nd order feedback system
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola13
•Consider a feedback network consisting of a forward amplifier with three identical poles, anda feedback network with a constant transfer function f
3rd order feedback system
a feedback network with a constant transfer function f
The poles of A(s) are therefore the solution to
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola14
MATLAB:
The transfer function with three poless = tf('s');p1=-1; p2=-2; p3=-4;T = 1 / [(1-s/p1)*(1-s/p2)*(1-s/p3)];rlocus(T)rlocus(T)
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola15
Adding a Zero:s = tf('s');z=-5; p1=-1; p2=-2; p3=-4;z 5; p1 1; p2 2; p3 4;T = (1-s/z) / [(1-s/p1)*(1-s/p2)*(1-s/p3)];rlocus(T)
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola16
Benchmarking•In order to compare the merit of various compensation techniques, it makes sense to inspect the loop’s unity gain frequency before and after the compensation is applied•Rationale: The maximum bandwidth we can possibly expect from a feedback amplifier is theunity gain frequency of the loopRegardless of the order of the feedback system, the closed-loop response departs from1/f as |T(s)| crosses unity1/f as |T(s)| crosses unity
Consider a loop transfer function with n “dominant” poles that occur before the unitycrossover
The product of the low frequency loop gain and all dominant poles is called the loop gainpole product (LP product)pole product (LP product)Note that in a first-order system, the LP product is simply the gainbandwidth product
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola17
Feedback Zero CompensationLeave amplifier poles unchanged and introduce a zero in the feedback network
•Efficiency of Feedback Zero Compensation
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola18
To first order, since we do not change the poles, the LP product and ωu are (approximately)unchanged.Feedback zero compensation is therefore bandwidth efficient, since we do not need top ,sacrifice bandwidth to stabilize the circuit.To second order, the LP product will change slightly due to loading from the capacitanceadded in the feedback networkNarrowbanding Compensation
Idea: Make one of the loop poles dominant,leave other poles unchanged
•Efficiency of Narrowbanding
ωp1 that gives a maximally flat magnitude responsefor the closed-loop amplifier?
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola19
The crossover and bandwidth is limited to some fraction of ωp2 At first glance, this makes narrowbanding appear to be inefficientHowever, provided that ωp2 is close to the transit frequency of the process technology, this, p p2 q y p gy,compensation approach is acceptable and hard to surpass in terms of absolute achievableclosed-loop speedExample: Single Gain Stage with Current Bufferp g g
•Cgs introduces a non-dominant pole athigh frequencies ωp2 = ωT•CL is adjusted until the circuit achieves thedesired phase margin•This type of narrowbanding is called “loadcompensation,” since stability is ensured byproperly sizing the load capacitance CLproperly sizing the load capacitance CL
Example Realizations
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola20
Two-Stage OTA•The two-stage amplifier shown below has two comparable poles, assuming that there is noadditional significant pole from the feedback networkg p
If the feedback network is resistive, we maybe able to compensate the amplifier byintroducing a feedback zerooduc g a eedbac e oWhat can we do if the feedback iscapacitive?
Narrowbanding is not a good idea since both poles are at low frequenciesNarrowbanding is not a good idea, since both poles are at low frequencies
Miller CompensationPurposely connect a capacitor across the second transconductor!p y p
•Two interesting things happenLow frequency input capacitance of secondstage becomes large – moves the first pole tog g pa lower frequencyQualitatively speaking, at high frequencies,Cc turns the second stage into a “diodeconnected device” low impedance i e largeconnected device – low impedance, i.e. largeωp2
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola21
• Using the dominant pole approximation:
RHP zero:
We can approximate further as shown below
GBW set by gm1 and CcGBW set by gm1 and Cc
“Pole Splitting”: Increasing Cc reduces ωp1 , and increases ωp2p g g p1 p2
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola22
A very nice “knob” for adjusting the phase margin of the circuit!
•Graphical View of Pole Splitting
Miller Compensation of the Two-Stage Op Amp
The various capacitors are:The various capacitors are:Cc = accomplishes the Miller compensationCM = capacitance associated with the first-stagemirror (mirror pole)CI = output capacitance to ground of the first-stageCII = output capacitance to ground of the second-stage
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola23
Compensated Two-Stage, Small-Signal Frequency Response Model SimplifiedUse the CMOS op amp to illustrate:• Assume that:
36 3 3 1, , m
C gd m ds ds uM
gC C g g g GBC
1 6,m mI m mIIg g g g
1 1R R 2 4 6 7
,I IIds ds ds ds
R Rg g g g
2 4 6 6 7 7,I db db gs II L db db gdC C C C C C C C C
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola24
2I I c c out mI inG s C C V sC V g V
Nodal Equations:
2 0mII c II II c outg sC V G s C C V
out mI mII cV s g g sC
2in I II II I II I II c mII c I II c I c IIV s G G s G C C G C C g C s C C C C C C
0 1/
sA
0
2/
1mII cout
in I I II II II c mII I II c I I I II c I c II
g CV sV s s R C C R C C g R R C s R R C C C C C C
g gg g 1 60
2 4 6 7
m mI II
I II ds ds ds ds
g gg gAG G g g g g
21 11 1 1s s sD
1 2 1 2 1 21 1 1D s s
p p p p p p
2
22 1 1 1s sp p D s as bs 2 1
1 1 21 1p p D s as bs
p p p
1 21 , ap pa b
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola25
2 4 6 7
16
1 1 ds ds ds ds
I I II II II c mII I II c mII I II c m c
g g g gpR C C R C C g R R C g R R C g C
62
I I II II II c mII I II c mII mR C C R C C g R R C g gap
I c IIC C C
2I I I II c I c II II L
pb R R C C C C C C C C
Right-half plane zero: 61
mII m
c c
g gzC C
The unity gain bandwidth:
c c
10 1
1 mI mI II
I II mII I II c c c
g gg gGB A pG G g R R C C C
ωp2 must be greater than unity-gainbandwidth or satisfactory phase margin will not beachieved.•Influence of the Mirror Pole
Th t f f ti f th i t t th t t lt f th fi t t
3 1 3 3 4M db db gs gsC C C C C C
The transfer function from the input to the output voltage of the first stage
01 1 3 1 3 1 3 31
/ 2 2 /1m m ds ds m m
d d d d d d
sV s g g g g g g C
sV s g g g g g sC g g
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola26
2 4 3 1 3 3 2 4
3 31
/in ds ds m ds ds ds ds
m
sV s g g g g g sC g gg C
3 3 32 /mz g C
3 3 3/mp g C
Th i t f 45° h i i•The requirement for 45° phase margin is:
1 2 1
180 arg 180 45Mp p z
A j F j arctg arctg arctg
1 1, 1,2,pi i zp i z
Let ω = GB and assume that ωz1 >=10GB, GB GB
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola27
1 2
45 180 0.1p p
GB GBarctg arctg arctg
0 02
135 0.1 , 1p
GBarctg A arctg arctg A
2 2135 90 5.7 135 90 5.7
p p
GB GBarctg arctg
22 2
39.3 0.818 1.22pp p
GB GBarctg GB
If 60° phase margin is required then the following relationships apply:If 60 phase margin is required, then the following relationships apply:
1 210 2.2z pGB GB
6 16 1
10 10m mg g g g 6 110m mc c
g gC C
6 12
2.2 0.22m mc
g g C CC C
c cC C
CMOS op amp Slew Rate (SR)Sl t h t fl i i it b li it d d i i•Slew rate occurs when currents flowing in a capacitor become limited and is given as
limCdvI C
dt
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola28
5 6 5 7 56 5min , ,
c L c
I I I I ISR I IC C C
5 7 5 5
7 5min , ,c L c
I I I ISR if I IC C C
Therefore, if CL is not too large and if I7 is significantly greater than I5, then the slew rate ofthe two-stage op amp should be, I5/Cc.
RIGHT-HALF PLANE ZERO
Controlling the Right-Half Plane ZeroWhy is the RHP zero a problem?Because it boosts the magnitude but lags the phase the worst possible combination forBecause it boosts the magnitude but lags the phase - the worst possible combination forstability.Solution of the problem: The compensation comes from the feedback path through Cc, butthe RHP zero comes from the feedforward path through Cc so eliminate the feedforward path!
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola29
Use of Buffer to Eliminate the Feedforward Path through the Miller Capacitor
021
outV s AV s s R C C R C g R R C s R R C C C
1in I I II II II mII I II c I II II I cV s s R C C R C g R R C s R R C C C
2 4 6 7
16
1 1 ds ds ds ds
I I II II II mII I II c mII I II c m c
g g g gpR C C R C g R R C g R R C g C
6I I II II II mII I II c mII I II c m cg g g
I I II II II mII I II mII cR C C R C g R R g Ca
I c IIC C C
2
I I II II II mII I II mII c
I II II I c II I c
g g Capb R R C C C C C C
Poles are approximately what they were before with the zero removedFor 45° phase margin ω must be greater than GBFor 45 phase margin, ωp2 must be greater than GBFor 60° phase margin, , ωp2 must be greater than 1.73GB
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola30
Use of Buffer with Finite Output Resistance to Eliminate the RHP Zero•Assume that the unity-gain buffer has an output resistance of Ro
• It can be shown that if the output resistance of the buffer amplifier, Ro, is not neglected thatanother pole occurs at,
and a LHP zero at 4
0
1
I c I cp
R C C C C
and a LHP zero at
Although the LHP zero can be used for compensation, the additional pole makes this
20
1
cz
R C
method less desirable than the following method.
Use of Nulling Resistor to Eliminate the RHP Zero (or turn it into a LHP zero)
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola31
01
cImI in I I I out
I c z
sCVg V sC V V VR sC R
Nodal Equations:
I c z
01
cImI I II out out I
II c z
sCVg V sC V V VR sC R
2 3
1
1
cmI mII I II z c
mIIout
i
Cg g R R s R CgV s
V s bs cs ds
1inV s bs cs ds
I I c II II c mII I II c z cb R C C R C C g R R C R C
R R C C C C C C R C R C R C I II I II c I c II z c I I II IIc R R C C C C C C R C R C R C
I II I II c zd R R C C C R
If Rz is assumed to be less than RI or RII and the poles widely spaced then the roots of theIf Rz is assumed to be less than RI or RII and the poles widely spaced, then the roots of theabove transfer function can be approximated as
11 1 1
1I I c II II c mII I II c z c mII II I c mII II I cp
R C C R C C g R R C R C g R R C g R R C
2mII c mII
c I I II c II II
g C gpC C C C C C C
1
111
c z
zC R
g
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola32
41
z Ip
R C mIIg
Note that the zero can be placed anywhere on the real axis!We desire that z1 = p2 in terms of the previous notation
2 11 1c IIII
c z zmII mII c mII
C CCp z C R Rg g C g
With p2 canceled, the remaining roots are p1 and p4(the pole due to Rz) . For unity-gainstability, all that is required is that
0AA GB 4 0 1p pmII II I c
A GBg R R C
1 mIg GBR C C
Substituting Rz into the above inequality and assuming CII >> Cc results in
z I cR C C
mIgC C C
This procedure gives excellent stability for a fixed value of CII (≈ CL).Unfortunately, as CL changes, p2 changes and the zero must be readjusted to cancel
c I IImII
C C Cg
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola33
y g p g jp2!
Incorporating the Nulling Resistor into the Miller Compensated Two-Stage Op Amp
62
mII m
II L
g gpC C
1
0
1 mI mI
mII II I c mII mI II I c c
g gpg R R C g g R R C A C
41
z Ip
R C 1
6
11
c zm
zC R
g
6mg
•Design of the Nulling Resistor (M8)For the zero to be on top of the second pole (p2), the following relationship must hold
1 1 1c II c L c LC C C C C CR
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola34
6 6 62 /c II c L c L
zc mII c m c D p ox
RC g C g C I C W L
The resistor, Rz, is realized by the transistor M8 which is operating in the active regionbecause the dc current through it is zero. Therefore, Rz, can be written as
1 1
The bias circuit is designed so that voltage VA is equal to VB. As a result
8
8 8 880
1 1/ /
DS
zD DS p ox SG THPV
Ri v C W L V V
Equating the two expressions for Rz gives
1010 8
10
2/
DGS THP GS THP
p ox
IV V V VC W L
q g p g
101010 8
8
/1 1/ 22/
/
zp ox DD
p ox
W LR
W L C IIC W LC W L
810/p
p oxC W L
10
106 8
/1 1/ 22 /
c Lz
c p ox DD
W LC CRC W L C II C W L
106 86
68 10 6
10
2 /
/ / /
c p ox DD p ox
c D
c L D
I C W L
C IW L W L W LC C I
1011 6
11 66
DGS GS
D
IW WV VL I L
210 6
811
/ //
/c
c L
W L W LCW LC C W L
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola35
•An Alternate Form of Nulling Resistor
To cancel p2To cancel p2,
6 66 6
1 1 1c L Lz m m B
c m m B c
C C CR g gC g g C
6 6
6 6
2 2 1/ /
D D B L
p ox p ox cB
I I CC W L C W L C
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola36
Increasing the Magnitude of the Output Pole
12 4 9
1
d d dR
g g g
26
1
d dR
g g
2 4 9ds ds dsg g g 6 7ds dsg g
Nodal equations:8
1 1 8 8 1 1m c
in m s outg sCI G V g V G V V
g sC
S l i f th t f f ti V t/Ii i
8m cg sC
86 1 2 2
80 m c
m outm c
g sCg V G sC Vg sC
Solving for the transfer function Vout/Iin gives
6 8
21 2 62 1 2
1
1
c
out m m
in c c m c
sCV s g gI s G G C C g CC C C
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola37
21 2 62 1 2
8 2 2 1 2 8 21in c c m c
m m
C C g CC C Cs sg G G G G g G
Using the approximate method of solving for the roots of the denominator gives
1 21 6p C C g CC C
262 6
8 2 2 1 2
c c m c m ds c
m
C C g CC g r Cg G G G G
26 2m ds cg r C
28 2 6 8
2 22 2
8 2
66 3
m ds m m ds
c
m
g r G g g rp pC C Cg G
8
2m
c
gzC
where all the various channel resistance have been assumed to equal rds and p2’ is the outputpole for normal Miller compensation.Result: Dominant pole is approximately the same and the output pole is increased by ≈gmrdsIn addition there is a LHP zero at gm8/sCc and a RHP zero due to Cgd6 (shown dashed inIn addition there is a LHP zero at -gm8/sCc and a RHP zero due to Cgd6 (shown dashed inthe previous model) at gm6/Cgd6.Roots are:
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola38
FEEDFORWARD COMPENSATIONUse two parallel paths to achieve a LHP zero for lead compensation purposes
mIIgs
1out c c
i c II
II c II
sV s AC ACV s C C s
R C C
•To use the LHP zero for compensation, a compromise must be observedPlacing the zero below GB will lead to boosting of the loop gain that could deteriorate thephase marginPlacing the zero above GB will have less influence on the leading phase caused by thePlacing the zero above GB will have less influence on the leading phase caused by thezero
• Note that a source follower is a good candidate for the use of feedforward compensationThis type of compensation is often used in source followers. The capacitor will provide a
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola39
path that bypasses the transistor at high frequencies
♦ POWER SUPPLY REJECTION RATIO OF THE TWO-STAGE OP AMP
What is PSRR?
00
v dd
dd in
A vPSRR
A v
00
v ss
ss in
A vPSRR
A v
Method for calculating PSRR:
11
dd ddout dd dd dd
v v
A AV V V VA A PSRR
2out dd dd v dd dd v outV A V A V A V A V
v v
dd
out
VPSRRV
ss
out
VPSRRV
If we connect the op amp in the unity-gain mode and input an AC signal of Vdd (Vss) inseries with VDD (VSS), PSRR will be equal
ddVPSRR ssVPSRR
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola40
outPSRR
V
outPSRR
V
Negative PSRR
1 0I c I mI c outG sC sC V g sC V 1I c I mI c outg
1 7 7 7mII c II c II gd out ds gd ssg sC V G sC sC sC V g sC V
Solving for Vout/Vss and inverting:C C C C C C C C C C
2
7
ss
out m I c I
V as bs cV g G s C C
g g
Solve for approximate roots:
7 7c I I II II c I gd c gda C C C C C C C C C C
7I c II gd II c I c mII mIb G C C C G C C C g g
I II mII mIc G G g g Solve for approximate roots:
77
1 1 c I c II c IIc
mI mII css mII mI
dI d
C C C C C CCs sg g CV g gPSRR
CV G g C C
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola41
77
71 1 gdout I ds c I
I ds
CV G g C Cs sG g
21 11 1
0c II
pmI mII II vss mII mI
s sC Cs s GBg g G AV g gPSRR
7 77 7
7 71 1 1 1gd gdout I ds dsc mI
ds I ds I
PSRRC CV G g gC gss s sg G g GB G
Comments:Comments:• DC gain has been increased by the ratio of GII to gds7• Two poles instead of one, however the pole at -gds7/Cgd7 is large and can be ignored.
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola42
Positive PSRR
The nodal equations:
1I c I mI c out I ddG sC sC V g sC V G V
1 4 2 4 6 7 1 2 6, , ,I ds ds ds ds II ds ds mI m m mII mG g g g g G g g g g g g g 1 6mII c II c II out mII ds ddg sC V G sC sC V g g V
Using Cramers rule to solve for the transfer functionVout/Vdd, and inverting the transferfunction gives the following result
1 4 2 4 6 7 1 2 6, , ,I ds ds ds ds II ds ds mI m m mII mG g g g g G g g g g g g g
2ssV as bs c
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola43
6 6 6
ss
out I ds c mII I ds I mII dsV G g s C g G g C g g
c I I II II ca C C C C C C
I c II II c I c mII mIb G C C G C C C g g
I II mII mIc G G g g
We may solve for the approximate roots of numerator as
6
1 1
1
c I c II c IIc
mI mII cdd mII mI
out I ds mII c
C C C C C CCs sg g CV g gPSRR
V G g g Cs
Where gmII > gmI and that all transconductances are larger than the channel conductances:
61 mII c
I dssG g
2
6 6
1 11 10
01 1
c II
pmI mII II vdd mII mI
out I ds ds II vmII c
s sC Cs s GBg g G AV g gPSRRV G g g G Ag C s
At approximately the dominant pole the PSRR falls off with a -20dB/decade slope and
6 6
6 61 1out I ds ds II vmII c
I ds ds
g ggsG g GB g
At approximately the dominant pole, the PSRR falls off with a 20dB/decade slope anddegrades the higher frequency PSRR + of the two-stage op amp.
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola44
Approximate Model for PSRR+The M7 current sink causes VSG6 to act like a battery2) Therefore, Vdd couples from the source to gate of M63) Th th t th t t i th h it f t t d i f M63) The path to the output is through any capacitance from gate to drain of M6Conclusion: The Miller capacitor Cc couples the positive power supply ripple directly to theoutput.Must reduce or eliminate Cc!
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola45
Approximate Model for Negative PSRR with VBias Connected to GroundApproximate Model for Negative PSRR with VBias Connected to Ground
Path through the inputstage is not important aslong as the CMRR is highg g
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola46
Path through the output stage:
7t t tV I Z g V Z 7out ss out m ss outV I Z g V Z
1||1
outout out
out out out
RZ RsC sC R
7
1out m out
ss out out
V g RV sC R
The two-stage op amp will never have good PSRR because of the Miller compensationThe two-stage op amp is a very general and flexible op amp
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola47
Cascoding!
•The compensation scheme used in this paper employs a feedforward path to create LHPeros b t does not se an Miller capacitor
Feedforward compensation without Miller Capacitor
zeros, but does not use any Miller capacitor.•The dominant pole is not pushed to lower frequencies, resulting in a higher gain-bandwidthproduct with a fast step response.
0, 1,2,3mi
vii
gA ig
0
0, 1,2j
pjj
gj
C
3
1 2 3 1 1 vv v v
s A sA A AA A A
1 1 2 3 1
1 2 3
1 2 1 21 1 1 1
p v v v pv v v
p p p p
A A AH s A A A
s s s s
The OTA transfer function has two poles and a LHP zero created by the feedforward path.The location of the LHP zero is
1 2 1 21 v v m mA A g gz
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola48
1 13 01 3
1 pv m
zA C g
The second and feedforward stages can be designed such that the negative phase shift dueto ωp2 is compensated by the positive phase shift of the LHP zeroWhen the frequency of ωp2 exactly coincides with that of the LHP zero, the amplifier phaseq y p2 y , p pmargin is 90 and the unity-gain frequency is given by
1 2 3 1 2 1v v v v v pGB A A A A A
(a) Perfect pole–zero cancellation (b) Pole–zero mismatch
This compensation scheme results in an amplifier with high gain and fast responseThe bandwidth improvement is due to the fact that the poles are not split, as is the case in any amplifier with Miller compensation
Radivoje Đurić, 2015, Analogna Integrisana Kola49