" EXPERIMENTAL METHOD " STATISTICAL ERROR ( 5 × 10 8 Pulses; ~½ of E158 running) δA D /A D = 0.006 δ sin 2 θ W = 0.0006 " EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEMATIC ERRORS δA D /A D = 0.006 δ sin 2 θ W = 0.0006 (ASSUMING STANDARD MODEL) " THEORETICAL SYSTEMATIC ERRORS δ sin 2 θ W = 0.0004 (ASSUMING STANDARD MODEL) " TOTAL ERROR δA D /A D = 0.008 δ sin 2 θ W = 0.0009 (ASSUMING STANDARD MODEL) OUTLINE
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
250 MHz FLASH ADCs on EACH BLOCK10 BIT RESOLUTIONDEVELOPED FOR KAMLAND by BERKELEY
" COUNTING SINGLE ELECTRONS
" RATE DEPENDENCESPACE AND TIME SEPARATION OF PARTICLESPULSE HEIGHT AND SHAPE FOR OVERLAPSMEASURE RESIDUAL RATE DEPENDENCE
DETECTOR
Momentum Range of electronshitting a given row of PbG blocks.Red curve is minimum P cut for 1 e.Blue curve is minimum P cut for 2 e.
Number of events/spill in eachrow of PbG blocks.
14 electrons/spill : Dashed blue curve 4 pions/spillSolid Red Curve is e and π
" BEAM POLARIZATION
" MEAN Q 2
" ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATIVE CORRECTION" PILE UP AND DEAD TIME" TARGET PURITY AND DENSITY" PION CONTAMINATION" FALSE ASYMMETRIES" PAIR SYMMETRIC BACKGROUND
EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEMATIC ERRORS
" COMPTON POLARIMETERPHOTON−ELECTRON SCATTERINGRADIATIVE CORRECTIONS <0.1%USED AT SLD WITH 0.5% ACCURACYHIGH POWER LASERDETECT SCATTERED ELECTRONDETECT SCATTERED PHOTON (INDEPENDENT MEASUREMENT)MEASURE CONTINUOUSLYMEASUREMENT TAKES ~5 MINUTES
BEAM POLARIZATION
ESA
POLARIMETER ANALIZING POWER AND RATES DETECTOR EDGES AND BACKGROUND
Signal
Background
" BACKGROUNDS" FROM ELECTRON BEAM
e.g. BREMSSTRAHLUNG FROM GAS IN BEAMLINE� MEASURE WITH LASER OFF
� LASER PULSES AT 17 Hz
ELECTRONIC NOISE: PULSING LASER� MEASURE WITH BEAM OFF
" SLD EXPERIENCE (Mike Woods)
SIMILAR SETUP ⇒ δPe = 0.5%
" NLC NEEDS 0.25% ACCURACYIMPORTANT TO TEST TECHNIQUESESA BEAM NOW SIMILAR TO NLC BEAM
" WE CAN DO δ P = 0.3%
BEAM POLARIZATION
" NEED TO KNOW: δ<Q2>/<Q2> ≤ 0.3%
" Q2 = 4 E E′ SIN2θ /2 (θ =12o ~200 mr)
" MEASURE δ E/E ≤ 0.1%
ZERO CROSSING OF BEAM POLARIZATION
" OPTICS MEASUREMENTS FOR E′ (0.2%) & θ (0.2 mr)
" METHODS FROM PAST EXPERIMENTS
FLOATING WIRE USED IN E140 (We have shorter spectrometer)
CENTRAL ANGLE ±0.05 mr
CENTRAL MOMENTUM δE′/E′ ±0.03%
AGREEMENT WITH ELASTIC PEAK 0.13%
AVERAGE Q 2 OF EVENTS
FIELD MAPS OF MAGNETS AND SURVEY
SPECIAL ACCEPTANCE RUNS
SHORT TARGETS IN VARIOUS POSITIONS
BEAM ENERGY SWEEP (E154)
QUADS ON / OFF
APERATURE DEFINING MASKS (E154)
CROSS SECTION WELL KNOWN FROM PREVIOUS FITS
" OVERALL UNCERTAINTY: δ<Q2>/<Q2> ≤ 0.3%
AVERAGE Q 2 OF EVENTS
" WELL KNOWN TECHNIQUE
Mo and Tsai
Bardin
USED IN ALL ELECTRON SCATTERING EXPERIMENTS
INTERNAL CORRECTIONS
AT THE SCATTERING NUCLEON
EXTERNAL CORRECTIONS
ENERGY LOSS IN TARGET
POLARIZATION LOSS IN TARGET
" OUR KINEMATICS HAVE SMALL CORRECTIONS
EM RADIATIVE CORRECTIONS
" INTERNAL COMPARE Mo −Tsai WITH Bardin
AVERAGE DIFFERENCE δAD/AD = < 0.001
" EXTERNAL:
USE DIFFERENT FITS TO F2(X,Q2) AS INPUT:
GET AVERAGE DIFFERENCE IN ASYMMETRY
RESONANCE MODELS δAD/AD < 0.001
DIS MODELS δAD/AD ~ 0.002
" TOTAL ERROR: δAD/AD < 0.003
EM RC ERROR DETERMINATION
.
THEORETICAL SYSTEMATIC ERRORS
" AD IS EXPERIMENTALLY MEASURED
� FOCUS: EXTRACT sin2θW FROM ADASSUME STANDARD MODEL
sin2θW IS BURIED IN THE C ij
C1U ~ −1/2 +4/3 sin2θW
" ERRORS FROM R’s, Y, ETC.
" R = fi(x)/(Σf) : Fraction of sea or valence quarks
" Rc, Rs SMALL; R V ~ 1.0 at our values of x
Determined from Parton Distribution Functions
CTEQ, MRS Groups Provide Errors (2002)
Over 25 Distributions Considered
Uncertainties from CTEQ Errors, and Most Different Distribution
" δ sin2θW ~ 0.0002
"Ad Depends on Couplings and Quark Distributions
PARTON DISTIBUTIONS
" Higher Order pQCD easy to do." Higher Twist
DECREASES ~ Q−2 Compared to leading twist 2
Q2 =20: δsin2θW < 2×10−5 (Castorina & Mulders)
NACHTMANN MOMENTS OF F 2 : HT < .4% OF LT
(Osipenko et al.)
WE USE CONSERVATIVE δsin2θW ~ 0.0001
LOI at JLAB for Experiment at low Q 2
QCD and HIGHER TWIST
" NO VIOLATION : un = dp ; up = dn; sp = sn ; cp = cn
Assumes that n and p are perfect isospin doublet Broken by E & M Mp ≠ Mn But only by about 0.1%
md/mu ≈1.8 ; md−mu ≈3 MeV : ~ 1% of ΛQCD
So Expect δ(un −dp) ≈ 0" CAN BE CALCULATED
MIT bag modelMeson Cloud Model
AVERAGE OF MODELS: δ sin2θW ≈0.0002 ± 0.0002SAME MODEL FOR NuTeV: 0.0015
CHARGE SYMMETRY VIOLATION IN DEUTERON
"Very Well Determined in Standard Model
" Depends on α, MZ, MW, MH ,Q2, sin2θW
C1U
= ρ′(−1/2 +4/3 κ′sin2θW) + λ1u
ρ′,κ′≈1; λ1u≈0" Overall Correction to Asymmetry < 1%" Weak Dependence on Higgs Mass
"Cut off’s depend on Q2 , not on quark masses" Jens Erler & Michael Ramsey−Musolf in collaboration
" δ sin2θW ≈ 0.0002
ELECTROWEAK RADIATIVE CORRECTIONS
" EMC EFFECT IN DEUTERIUM?σD/ (σp + σn) ~ 0.98 to 1.00 IN OUR X RANGE
IF PARTON DISTRIBUTION SHIFTED TO LOWER X� Rs, Rc, Rv RATIOS UNCHANGED.
� NO EFFECT ON ASYMMETRYVALENCE & SEA SHIFTED DIFFERENTLY (Frankfurt & Strikman)
� δ sin2θW ≈ 0.00002" NUCLEAR EFFECTS SHOULD BE SAME FOR γ & Z EXCHANGE
NO CHANGE IN ASYMMETRYONLY NEUTRAL CURRENTS
" CALCULATION BEING DONE BY Alekhin, Kulagin and Liuti
NULEAR EFFECTS
.
" MEASURES UNIQUE INDEPENDENT PARAMETERS Cij" SPECIFIC SENSITIVITY TO NEW PHYSICS" FACTOR OF 20 DECREASE IN ERRORS
" δ sin 2θW = 0.0009 (ΑSSUMING STANDARD MODEL)
NuTeV ~ 0.0016 (εL , εR)
E158 ~ 0.001 ( lepton couplings)"THEORETICAL CORRECTIONS SMALL"THEORETICAL SYSTEMATIC ERRORS SMALL ( 0.0004) "IN A LONG TRADITION OF HIGH ACCURACY
MEASUREMENTS IN ESA"EXPERIENCED COLLABORATION READY TO START "LOW COST: < 0.001 NLC"WANT RESULTS BEFORE LHC ( BUT DIFFERENT THAN LHC)
SUMMARY
OPTICS
Errors on Asymmetry from Uncertainty in Parton Distributions
UNCERTAINTY ON R = σL/σT
� R ~ 0.03± 0.025 (E140)
� AVERAGE: δ sin2θW ≈0.0001
ElectroWeak Corrections
� Running of αs due to γ−Z Mixing
� Axial−vector renormalization: small
� Anapole moment: negligible
� Charge−radii: 0.1% on Ad.
� WW and ZZ box diagrams: < 0.1% on Ad.
� γ−Z box diagram: < 0.1% uncertainty on Ad
� OVERALL UNCERTAINTY:
δ sin2θW ≈ 0.0002
INTERNALDIFFERENT CODESAvg < 0.001
EXTERNAL DIFFERENT MODELSAvg = 0.002
RADIATIVE CORRECTIONS
RATE DEPENDENCE
� SPACE AND TIME SEPARATION OF SHOWERS
OVERLAP of 2 electrons : 4% of electrons merge
� ENERGY SEPARATION
2 Electrons of E > Emin
Additional separation of factor of 15� Energy Straggling� Gaps between blocks
Leaves 0.3% confusion between 1 electron and 2 electrons
� MEASURE RATE DEPENDENCE OF CONFUSION
Another factor of 10
δ ΑD/AD ~ 0.03%
REQUEST FOR BEAM
ENERGY PULSES 35.6 2 × 108
38. 8 2 × 108
35.6 4 × 107 Checkout
35.6 3 × 107 backgrounds
12 to 38 3 × 107 energy scan
TOTAL 5 × 108 2.3 Mo @120 Hz, 70% eff
SPECTROMETERS� 2 IDENTICAL SPECTROMETERS AT ± 120
� QUAD−DIPOLE−QUAD
� FOCUS MOMENTUM
� MAXIMIZE ACCEPTANCE USING EXISING MAGNETS
� ~0.8 msr ACCEPTANCE FOR 9 < P < 16 GeV
� 18 PARTICLES/SPILL/SPECTROMETER
� 14 e− SPREAD UNIFORMLY OVER DETECTOR
� 4 π /spill CONCENTRATED AT BOTTOM
" USE OLDBEAM FROM E158 (VERY STABLE )TARGET FROM E158SPECTROMETER DESIGN FROM E155XMAGNETS FROM E1DETECTOR FROM E142 −E155XCALIBRATION METHOD FROM E140XCOMPTON POLARIMETER FROM SLDPEOPLE FROM ALL THE ABOVE + MANY MORE