1 Outline of Survey on Trends of Land Transaction (First Survey) for FY2017 November, 2017 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Land Economy and Construction Industries Bureau, Real Estate Market Division <Survey method, etc.> 1. Purpose of the survey This is a survey of major companies which appear to have a great influence on land market trends, and is carried out to understand and organize their short-term intentions regarding land transactions, etc. with an aim to develop and provide simple and clear leading indicators. 2. Coverage of the survey Listed companies (including over-the-counter trading) and unlisted companies with capital of 1 billion yen or more. 3. Survey items (1) Judgments about the land transaction situation (2) Judgments about land price levels (3) Intentions to purchase or sell land (4) Intentions to increase or decrease land and buildings for own company use 4. Survey method: Questionnaire survey (sending and collecting by mail) 5. Date of the survey: August 2017 6. Results of the collection No. of questionnaires distributed No. of valid responses Rate of valid responses Listed companies 1,750companies 609 companies 34.8％ Unlisted companies 1,750 companies 840 companies 48.0％ Total 3,500 companies 1,449 companies 41.4％ 7. Implementing agency of the survey: Advanced Solutions Technology Japan,Inc.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Outline of Survey on Trends of Land Transaction (First Survey) for FY2017
November, 2017 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism,
Land Economy and Construction Industries Bureau, Real Estate Market Division
<Survey method, etc.> 1. Purpose of the survey
This is a survey of major companies which appear to have a great influence on land market trends, and is carried out to understand and organize their short-term intentions regarding land transactions, etc. with an aim to develop and provide simple and clear leading indicators.
2. Coverage of the survey Listed companies (including over-the-counter trading) and unlisted companies with capital of 1 billion yen or more.
3. Survey items (1) Judgments about the land transaction situation (2) Judgments about land price levels (3) Intentions to purchase or sell land (4) Intentions to increase or decrease land and buildings for own company use
4. Survey method: Questionnaire survey (sending and collecting by mail) 5. Date of the survey: August 2017 6. Results of the collection
No. of questionnaires distributed
No. of valid responses
Rate of valid responses
Listed companies 1,750companies 609 companies 34.8％
Unlisted companies 1,750 companies 840 companies 48.0％
Total 3,500 companies 1,449 companies 41.4％ 7. Implementing agency of the survey: Advanced Solutions Technology Japan,Inc.
2
(1) Judgments about the land transaction situation Judgments about the land transaction situation in general terms were sought from
companies whose headquarters are located in each region. ① Judgment of current land transaction situation (DI) "Tokyo", increased by 7.3 points to +31.7 points, "Osaka" increased by 4.9 points to +
20.0 points, "Other regions" increased by 2.2 points to +3.6 points (Chart 1). ② Forecast of land transaction situation one year later (DI) "Tokyo" increased by 8.4 points to +24.2 points, "Osaka" increased by 1.2 points to +
7.0 points, "Other regions"increased by 2.3 points to -3.5 points(Chart 2). ③ Judgment of current land transaction situation (Answer) "Active" has increased by 6.3 points in "Tokyo", 1.4 points in "Osaka", and 2.4 points
in "other areas". "Inactivity" has decreased by 1.0 points in "Tokyo" and 3.5 points in "Osaka" (Chart 3). ④ Forecast of land transaction situation one year later (Answer) "Active" has increased by 6.4 points in "Tokyo" and by 4.2 points in "other areas".
"Inactive" decreased by 2.0 points for "Tokyo", 1.5 points for "Osaka", and 1.9 points for "other areas" (Chart 4).
Figure 1 DI about judgments of the current land transaction situation (by location of headquarters)
Note: DI = Rate of (Active)–(Sluggish). The unit is points.
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
September
2007
March
2008
September
2008
March
2009
September
2009
March
2010
September
2010
March
2011
September
2011
March
2012
August
2012
February
2013
August
2013
February
2014
August
2014
February
2015
August
2015
February
2016
August
2016
February
2017
August
2017
Tokyo Metropolitan Districts(current) Osaka Prefecture(current) Other regions(current)
3
Figure 2 DI about forecasts of the land transaction situation in a year’s time (by location of headquarters)
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
September
2007
March
2008
September
2008
March
2009
September
2009
March
2010
September
2010
March
2011
September
2011
March
2012
August
2012
February
2013
August
2013
February
2014
August
2014
February
2015
August
2015
February
2016
August
2016
February
2017
August
2017
Tokyo Metropolitan Districts(in a year's time) Osaka Prefecture(in a year's time) Other regions(in a year's time)
4
Figure 3 Judgments of the current land transaction situation (by location of headquarters)
27.0%
25.6%
23.9%
29.8%
32.2%
21.4%
21.2%
27.3%
16.3%
8.7%
11.0%
0.0%
2.0%
3.6%
2.4%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
1.5%
11.9%
44.7%
46.3%
66.0%
64.0%
65.1%
65.5%
61.2%
64.3%
68.6%
60.9%
65.9%
56.7%
50.0%
47.1%
46.0%
44.6%
31.3%
31.9%
20.5%
16.5%
30.9%
66.3%
48.1%
44.1%
7.0%
10.5%
11.0%
4.8%
6.6%
14.3%
10.2%
11.8%
17.9%
34.6%
39.0%
52.9%
52.0%
51.8%
66.3%
68.1%
78.5%
83.5%
67.6%
21.9%
7.2%
9.6%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Aug 2017
Feb 2017
Aug 2016
Feb 2016
Aug 2015
Feb 2015
Aug 2014
Feb 2014
Aug 2013
Feb 2013
Aug 2012
Mar 2012
Sep 2011
Mar 2011
Sep 2010
Mar 2010
Sep 2009
Mar 2009
Sep 2008
Mar 2008
Sep 2007
Mar 2007
38.8%
32.5%
30.5%
35.7%
36.4%
32.7%
34.6%
32.2%
23.3%
6.3%
4.4%
3.0%
2.6%
4.3%
2.5%
2.0%
0.8%
0.7%
2.7%
20.1%
46.6%
50.6%
54.1%
59.4%
59.4%
52.7%
56.4%
58.4%
55.6%
60.7%
62.8%
63.1%
53.6%
51.7%
47.3%
51.4%
41.6%
28.8%
29.6%
19.5%
38.6%
63.2%
46.7%
44.8%
7.1%
8.1%
10.2%
11.7%
7.2%
9.0%
9.8%
7.1%
13.9%
30.6%
42.0%
45.3%
50.1%
44.3%
55.9%
69.2%
69.6%
79.8%
58.7%
16.7%
6.8%
4.6%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Aug 2017
Feb 2017
Aug 2016
Feb 2016
Aug 2015
Feb 2015
Aug 2014
Feb 2014
Aug 2013
Feb 2013
Aug 2012
Mar 2012
Sep 2011
Mar 2011
Sep 2010
Mar 2010
Sep 2009
Mar 2009
Sep 2008
Mar 2008
Sep 2007
Mar 2007
15.8%
13.4%
13.9%
14.2%
16.4%
11.7%
14.5%
17.3%
9.9%
3.3%
4.0%
2.2%
1.6%
2.6%
1.4%
0.5%
1.0%
0.8%
1.4%
11.2%
22.0%
22.8%
64.8%
67.4%
65.2%
66.1%
67.3%
62.2%
62.1%
65.1%
67.7%
56.1%
47.0%
44.7%
39.6%
41.8%
33.1%
29.7%
26.0%
25.3%
41.8%
62.2%
59.3%
58.3%
19.4%
19.2%
21.0%
19.8%
16.4%
26.0%
23.5%
17.6%
22.4%
40.7%
49.0%
53.1%
58.8%
55.6%
65.5%
69.9%
73.0%
74.0%
56.8%
26.6%
18.7%
18.9%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Aug 2017
Feb 2017
Aug 2016
Feb 2016
Aug 2015
Feb 2015
Aug 2014
Feb 2014
Aug 2013
Feb 2013
Aug 2012
Mar 2012
Sep 2011
Mar 2011
Sep 2010
Mar 2010
Sep 2009
Mar 2009
Sep 2008
Mar 2008
Sep 2007
Mar 2007
Active Not active or sluggish Sluggish
Other
regions
5
Figure 4 Forecasts of land transaction situation in a year’s time (by location of headquarters)
16.0%
16.3%
16.2%
25.0%
17.4%
20.4%
22.2%
32.7%
23.6%
15.4%
13.0%
3.3%
3.0%
11.5%
2.9%
5.3%
2.4%
0.7%
1.5%
11.9%
38.9%
45.2%
75.0%
73.3%
74.7%
70.2%
72.7%
67.3%
68.4%
58.2%
66.7%
68.3%
54.0%
59.5%
55.0%
48.9%
46.1%
47.8%
32.2%
25.9%
30.9%
51.3%
55.8%
50.5%
9.0%
10.5%
9.1%
4.8%
9.9%
12.2%
9.4%
9.1%
9.8%
16.3%
33.0%
37.2%
42.0%
39.6%
51.0%
46.9%
65.4%
73.4%
67.6%
36.9%
5.3%
4.3%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Aug 2017
Feb 2017
Aug 2016
Feb 2016
Aug 2015
Feb 2015
Aug 2014
Feb 2014
Aug 2013
Feb 2013
Aug 2012
Mar 2012
Sep 2011
Mar 2011
Sep 2010
Mar 2010
Sep 2009
Mar 2009
Sep 2008
Mar 2008
Sep 2007
Mar 2007
31.0%
24.6%
31.5%
28.2%
32.3%
34.7%
37.7%
36.8%
28.0%
24.1%
7.4%
7.9%
6.0%
11.6%
5.6%
6.4%
4.3%
2.5%
3.0%
13.3%
38.6%
50.9%
62.3%
66.6%
61.8%
60.2%
61.1%
58.6%
56.3%
57.7%
62.7%
60.7%
60.4%
56.9%
53.9%
57.1%
52.5%
48.1%
45.6%
29.7%
32.5%
60.4%
54.0%
45.2%
6.8%
8.8%
6.8%
11.7%
6.7%
6.7%
5.9%
5.5%
9.3%
15.1%
32.3%
35.1%
40.2%
31.3%
41.9%
45.5%
50.1%
67.8%
64.4%
26.3%
7.5%
4.0%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Aug 2017
Feb 2017
Aug 2016
Feb 2016
Aug 2015
Feb 2015
Aug 2014
Feb 2014
Aug 2013
Feb 2013
Aug 2012
Mar 2012
Sep 2011
Mar 2011
Sep 2010
Mar 2010
Sep 2009
Mar 2009
Sep 2008
Mar 2008
Sep 2007
Mar 2007
14.1%
9.9%
13.8%
12.8%
15.1%
12.7%
15.5%
21.5%
16.1%
14.3%
5.0%
3.6%
3.1%
4.2%
1.6%
1.8%
1.3%
0.6%
1.4%
8.9%
23.0%
27.2%
68.4%
74.4%
68.3%
71.2%
72.0%
66.7%
64.2%
65.7%
68.1%
62.5%
54.5%
53.1%
46.8%
52.7%
43.0%
41.5%
39.1%
31.1%
32.5%
63.2%
61.6%
59.1%
17.6%
15.7%
17.9%
16.0%
13.0%
20.6%
20.3%
12.8%
15.8%
23.2%
40.5%
43.2%
50.1%
43.1%
55.4%
56.7%
59.6%
68.3%
66.0%
27.8%
15.4%
13.6%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Aug 2017
Feb 2017
Aug 2016
Feb 2016
Aug 2015
Feb 2015
Aug 2014
Feb 2014
Aug 2013
Feb 2013
Aug 2012
Mar 2012
Sep 2011
Mar 2011
Sep 2010
Mar 2010
Sep 2009
Mar 2009
Sep 2008
Mar 2008
Sep 2007
Mar 2007
Active Not active or sluggish Sluggish
Other
regions
6
(2) Judgments about land price levels
Judgments about land price levels at the locations of headquarters were sought from companies whose headquarters are located in each region. ① Judgment of current land price level (DI) "Tokyo"increased by 4.1 points to +57.8 points, "Osaka"increased by 1.8 points to +15.1 points, "Other regions" decreased by 4.2 points to -2.5 points (Chart 5). ② Forecast of land price level one year later (DI) "Tokyo"increased by 5.2 points to +40.4 points, "Osaka" increased by 3.5 points to +21.3 points, "Other regions"decreased by 2.6 points to -1.5 points (Chart 6). ③ Judgment of current land price level (Answer) "High" increased by 2.2 points in "Tokyo", by 4.9 points in "Osaka", "Low" in "Other areas" increased by 4.5 points. (Chart 7). ④ Forecast of land price level one year later (Answer) "Expected to rise" increased by 4.2 points in "Tokyo", 6.3 points by "Osaka", and 1.3 points by "other regions". "Falls expected" decreased 1.0 points in "Tokyo", but it increased by 2.8 points in "Osaka" and by 3.9 points in "Other regions" (Chart 8).
Figure 5 DI about Judgments of the current land price levels (by location of headquarters)
Note: DI = Rate of (High)–(Low). The unit is points.
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
September
2007
March
2008
September
2008
March
2009
September
2009
March
2010
September
2010
March
2011
September
2011
March
2012
August
2012
February
2013
August
2013
February
2014
August
2014
February
2015
August
2015
February
2016
August
2016
February
2017
August
2017
Tokyo Metropolitan Districts(current) Osaka Prefecture(current) Other regions(current)
7
Figure 6 DI about Forecasts of land price levels in a year’s time (by location of headquarters)
Note: DI = Rate of (Rise)–(Decline). The unit is points.
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
September
2007
March
2008
September
2008
March
2009
September
2009
March
2010
September
2010
March
2011
September
2011
March
2012
August
2012
February
2013
August
2013
February
2014
August
2014
February
2015
August
2015
February
2016
August
2016
February
2017
August
2017
Tokyo Metropolitan Districts(in a year's time) Osaka Prefecture(in a year's time) Other regions(in a year's time)
8
Figure 7 Judgments of the current land price levels (by location of headquarters)
24.2%
19.3%
28.2%
21.4%
19.7%
12.4%
19.1%
12.7%
13.2%
9.6%
13.1%
10.8%
14.1%
9.6%
14.3%
15.0%
24.1%
23.4%
27.9%
25.8%
30.6%
29.8%
66.7%
74.7%
63.1%
69.0%
68.4%
66.0%
66.1%
60.9%
64.5%
65.4%
58.6%
47.5%
54.5%
48.5%
42.4%
46.9%
38.4%
39.4%
45.6%
52.2%
51.7%
51.1%
9.1%
6.0%
8.7%
9.5%
12.0%
21.6%
14.8%
26.4%
22.3%
25.0%
28.3%
41.7%
31.3%
41.9%
43.3%
38.1%
37.4%
37.2%
26.5%
22.0%
17.7%
19.1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Aug 2017
Feb 2017
Aug 2016
Feb 2016
Aug 2015
Feb 2015
Aug 2014
Feb 2014
Aug 2013
Feb 2013
Aug 2012
Mar 2012
Sep 2011
Mar 2011
Sep 2010
Mar 2010
Sep 2009
Mar 2009
Sep 2008
Mar 2008
Sep 2007
Mar 2007
58.5%
56.3%
50.4%
50.9%
48.4%
44.6%
41.1%
38.9%
34.8%
31.3%
37.6%
39.2%
32.3%
34.9%
36.8%
40.6%
43.3%
50.6%
58.7%
57.0%
60.0%
50.3%
40.7%
41.1%
46.7%
47.9%
48.2%
49.8%
54.5%
54.1%
56.0%
55.7%
47.4%
44.9%
48.1%
47.4%
43.8%
37.2%
37.9%
36.2%
36.2%
39.0%
34.1%
44.0%
0.7%
2.6%
2.9%
1.2%
3.4%
5.6%
4.5%
6.9%
9.2%
13.0%
15.1%
15.9%
19.6%
17.7%
19.4%
22.2%
18.8%
13.2%
5.2%
3.9%
5.9%
5.8%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Aug 2017
Feb 2017
Aug 2016
Feb 2016
Aug 2015
Feb 2015
Aug 2014
Feb 2014
Aug 2013
Feb 2013
Aug 2012
Mar 2012
Sep 2011
Mar 2011
Sep 2010
Mar 2010
Sep 2009
Mar 2009
Sep 2008
Mar 2008
Sep 2007
Mar 2007
16.6%
16.3%
14.7%
15.7%
16.0%
11.7%
12.6%
13.7%
11.6%
13.1%
14.8%
13.7%
12.9%
16.1%
15.1%
15.4%
19.6%
21.6%
21.9%
22.2%
20.7%
20.3%
64.3%
69.0%
65.6%
64.9%
66.1%
59.8%
59.3%
62.9%
62.8%
58.6%
53.1%
53.8%
56.5%
52.3%
50.3%
49.1%
47.4%
48.5%
53.4%
56.1%
57.2%
54.0%
19.1%
14.6%
19.8%
19.4%
18.0%
28.5%
28.1%
23.4%
25.7%
28.3%
32.2%
32.5%
30.6%
31.6%
34.6%
35.5%
33.0%
29.9%
24.7%
21.7%
22.2%
25.8%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Aug 2017
Feb 2017
Aug 2016
Feb 2016
Aug 2015
Feb 2015
Aug 2014
Feb 2014
Aug 2013
Feb 2013
Aug 2012
Mar 2012
Sep 2011
Mar 2011
Sep 2010
Mar 2010
Sep 2009
Mar 2009
Sep 2008
Mar 2008
Sep 2007
Mar 2007
High Appropriate Low
Other
regions
9
Figure 8 Forecasts of land price levels in a year’s time (by location of headquarters)
25.3%
19.0%
21.4%
17.9%
27.7%
33.7%
27.6%
34.9%
21.5%
16.3%
7.1%
5.0%
4.0%
8.8%
2.9%
5.3%
3.4%
1.4%
2.9%
23.8%
51.0%
47.8%
70.7%
79.8%
71.8%
79.8%
67.2%
63.3%
69.8%
60.6%
72.7%
78.8%
75.8%
75.8%
68.7%
71.5%
64.4%
61.9%
56.9%
41.7%
38.2%
59.4%
46.2%
48.4%
4.0%
1.2%
6.8%
2.4%
5.0%
3.1%
2.6%
4.6%
5.8%
4.8%
17.2%
19.2%
27.3%
19.7%
32.7%
32.7%
39.7%
56.8%
58.8%
16.9%
2.9%
3.8%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Aug 2017
Feb 2017
Aug 2016
Feb 2016
Aug 2015
Feb 2015
Aug 2014
Feb 2014
Aug 2013
Feb 2013
Aug 2012
Mar 2012
Sep 2011
Mar 2011
Sep 2010
Mar 2010
Sep 2009
Mar 2009
Sep 2008
Mar 2008
Sep 2007
Mar 2007
42.7%
38.5%
43.4%
47.2%
51.4%
51.1%
54.5%
51.1%
41.9%
31.1%
8.6%
11.5%
7.5%
20.5%
10.9%
8.0%
7.6%
2.1%
7.0%
25.6%
57.7%
66.0%
55.1%
58.2%
54.2%
50.1%
47.0%
48.0%
44.4%
47.8%
55.3%
64.4%
79.7%
73.5%
69.1%
68.1%
69.9%
65.9%
60.2%
40.4%
49.2%
56.7%
39.4%
32.6%
2.3%
3.3%
2.3%
2.7%
1.5%
0.8%
1.2%
1.1%
2.8%
4.6%
11.6%
15.0%
23.4%
11.4%
19.2%
26.1%
32.2%
57.5%
43.8%
17.7%
2.9%
1.4%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Aug 2017
Feb 2017
Aug 2016
Feb 2016
Aug 2015
Feb 2015
Aug 2014
Feb 2014
Aug 2013
Feb 2013
Aug 2012
Mar 2012
Sep 2011
Mar 2011
Sep 2010
Mar 2010
Sep 2009
Mar 2009
Sep 2008
Mar 2008
Sep 2007
Mar 2007
14.0%
12.7%
11.9%
15.1%
16.3%
14.7%
16.4%
17.5%
14.1%
11.3%
4.2%
5.3%
2.1%
4.5%
2.2%
2.3%
2.4%
2.3%
5.0%
14.4%
26.0%
28.7%
70.5%
75.7%
77.0%
74.6%
73.0%
68.0%
69.0%
71.3%
71.7%
73.5%
69.6%
68.0%
67.2%
74.0%
61.3%
59.3%
57.6%
42.8%
52.0%
70.3%
64.1%
61.1%
15.5%
11.6%
11.2%
10.3%
10.7%
17.3%
14.6%
11.2%
14.1%
15.2%
26.2%
26.7%
30.7%
21.4%
36.5%
38.4%
40.0%
54.9%
43.0%
15.2%
9.8%
10.2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Aug 2017
Feb 2017
Aug 2016
Feb 2016
Aug 2015
Feb 2015
Aug 2014
Feb 2014
Aug 2013
Feb 2013
Aug 2012
Mar 2012
Sep 2011
Mar 2011
Sep 2010
Mar 2010
Sep 2009
Mar 2009
Sep 2008
Mar 2008
Sep 2007
Mar 2007
High Appropriate Low
Other
regions
10
(3) Intentions to purchase or sell land
Regarding "Intention to purchase and sell land over the next year", both "purchase" and "sale" have decreased in all regions. DI ("Purchase" - "Sale") decreased by 1.3 points in "Tokyo", 0.1 points by "Other regions", and 0.4 points by "Osaka".
By industry, DI increased by 5.2 points as "purchased" increased by 0.9 points and "sold" decreased by 4.3 points for "manufacturing industry". In the "non-manufacturing industry", DI decreased by 4.1 points (Chart 9), as "Purchase" decreased by 2.5 points and "Sale" increased by 1.6 points.
Figure 9 Intentions to purchase or sell land within a year
(by location of properties)
(by industry)
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Sep
2007
Mar
2008
Sep
2008
Mar
2009
Sep
2009
Mar
2010
Sep
2010
Mar
2011
Sep
2011
Mar
2012
Aug
2012
Feb
2013
Aug
2013
Feb
2014
Aug
2014
Feb
2015
Aug
2015
Feb
2016
Aug
2016
Feb
2017
Aug
2017
Sep
2007
Mar
2008
Sep
2008
Mar
2009
Sep
2009
Mar
2010
Sep
2010
Mar
2011
Sep
2011
Mar
2012
Aug
2012
Feb
2013
Aug
2013
Feb
2014
Aug
2014
Feb
2015
Aug
2015
Feb
2016
Aug
2016
Feb
2017
Aug
2017
Sep
2007
Mar
2008
Sep
2008
Mar
2009
Sep
2009
Mar
2010
Sep
2010
Mar
2011
Sep
2011
Mar
2012
Aug
2012
Feb
2013
Aug
2013
Feb
2014
Aug
2014
Feb
2015
Aug
2015
Feb
2016
Aug
2016
Feb
2017
Aug
2017
Sep
2007
Mar
2008
Sep
2008
Mar
2009
Sep
2009
Mar
2010
Sep
2010
Mar
2011
Sep
2011
Mar
2012
Aug
2012
Feb
2013
Aug
2013
Feb
2014
Aug
2014
Feb
2015
Aug
2015
Feb
2016
Aug
2016
Feb
2017
Aug
2017
Purchase Sell DI
〈Osaka Prefecture〉 〈Other regions〉 〈Total〉〈Tokyo Metropolitan Districts〉
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Sep
2007
Mar
2008
Sep
2008
Mar
2009
Sep
2009
Mar
2010
Sep
2010
Mar
2011
Sep
2011
Mar
2012
Aug
2012
Feb
2013
Aug
2013
Feb
2014
Aug
2014
Feb
2015
Aug
2015
Feb
2016
Aug
2016
Feb
2017
Aug
2017
Sep
2007
Mar
2008
Sep
2008
Mar
2009
Sep
2009
Mar
2010
Sep
2010
Mar
2011
Sep
2011
Mar
2012
Aug
2012
Feb
2013
Aug
2013
Feb
2014
Aug
2014
Feb
2015
Aug
2015
Feb
2016
Aug
2016
Feb
2017
Aug
2017
Purchase Sell DI
〈Manufacturing industries〉 〈Non-manufacturing industries〉
11
Notes 1: The figures of the intentions to purchase or sell are the ratios of companies which responded that they intend to purchase or sell land to the total number of valid responses (the total number of valid responses in each industry for intentions by industry).
2: As for intentions by location of properties, multiple answers regarding regions are allowed for companies, so the totals may differ from the sums of each region.
12
(4) Intentions to increase or decrease land and buildings for own company use "Intention to increase / decrease land and buildings for in-house use in the next year" has
increased substantially in all areas. DI ("Increase" - "Decrease") by Property Location increased by 2.4 points in "Tokyo" and by 4.4 points in "Other Region", and "Osaka" is almost flat (Chart 10).
According to industry type, "Manufacturing" increased by 4.2 points while "Nonmanufacturing" decreased by 3.1 points.
Figure 10 Intentions to increase or decrease land and buildings for own company use within a year
(by location of properties)
(by industry)
Notes 1: The intentions to increase or decrease land and buildings for own company use are as follows: - Exclude the purpose of selling and lending to other companies and the purpose of investment - Include the use of a building only (cases of moving into a rental building as a tenant, etc. also apply) - Include “rent” or “terminate to rent,” not only to purchase or sell 2: The figures of the intentions to increase or decrease are the ratios of companies
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Sep
2007
Mar
2008
Sep
2008
Mar
2009
Sep
2009
Mar
2010
Sep
2010
Mar
2011
Sep
2011
Mar
2012
Aug
2012
Feb
2013
Aug
2013
Feb
2014
Aug
2014
Feb
2015
Aug
2015
Feb
2016
Aug
2016
Feb
2017
Aug
2017
Sep
2007
Mar
2008
Sep
2008
Mar
2009
Sep
2009
Mar
2010
Sep
2010
Mar
2011
Sep
2011
Mar
2012
Aug
2012
Feb
2013
Aug
2013
Feb
2014
Aug
2014
Feb
2015
Aug
2015
Feb
2016
Aug
2016
Feb
2017
Aug
2017
Sep
2007
Mar
2008
Sep
2008
Mar
2009
Sep
2009
Mar
2010
Sep
2010
Mar
2011
Sep
2011
Mar
2012
Aug
2012
Feb
2013
Aug
2013
Feb
2014
Aug
2014
Feb
2015
Aug
2015
Feb
2016
Aug
2016
Feb
2017
Aug
2017
Sep
2007
Mar
2008
Sep
2008
Mar
2009
Sep
2009
Mar
2010
Sep
2010
Mar
2011
Sep
2011
Mar
2012
Aug
2012
Feb
2013
Aug
2013
Feb
2014
Aug
2014
Feb
2015
Aug
2015
Feb
2016
Aug
2016
Feb
2017
Aug
2017
Increase Decrease DI
〈Tokyo Metropolitan Districts〉 〈Osaka Prefecture〉 〈Other regions〉 〈Total〉
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Sep
2007
Mar
2008
Sep
2008
Mar
2009
Sep
2009
Mar
2010
Sep
2010
Mar
2011
Sep
2011
Mar
2012
Aug
2012
Feb
2013
Aug
2013
Feb
2014
Aug
2014
Feb
2015
Aug
2015
Feb
2016
Aug
2016
Feb
2017
Aug
2017
Sep
2007
Mar
2008
Sep
2008
Mar
2009
Sep
2009
Mar
2010
Sep
2010
Mar
2011
Sep
2011
Mar
2012
Aug
2012
Feb
2013
Aug
2013
Feb
2014
Aug
2014
Feb
2015
Aug
2015
Feb
2016
Aug
2016
Feb
2017
Aug
2017
Increase Decrease DI
〈Manufacturing industries〉 〈Non-manufacturing industries〉
13
which responded that they have intentions to increase or decrease land and building use to the total number of valid responses (the total number of valid responses in each industry for intentions by industry).
Related Documents
