Outcomes in Acute Care Journal Club Arrowe Park Hospital Valluru ST4 Emergency Medicine 27/09/13
Mar 26, 2015
Outcomes in Acute Care
Journal Club Arrowe Park Hospital
Valluru ST4 Emergency Medicine27/09/13
Association between EDLOS (emergency department length of stay) and outcome
of patients admitted either to a ward, intensive care or high dependency unit
Emergency Medicine Australia 2013
Glossary
• EDLOS emergency department length of stay• ED emergency department• LOS length of stay• ICU intensive care unit• SDU step down unit• Access block is EDLOS greater than 8 hours,
patients waiting an inpatient bed in the ED resulting in overcrowding
• Short stay ward is observation ward
Known so far
• EDLOS and ICU outcome has mixed results• EDLOS is an independent predictor of ICU
mortality in sepsis• No studies to compare and contrast EDLOS
and outcome for patients admitted to ward, ICU or SDU in the same health setting
Objectives
• To compare and contrast the association between EDLOS and hospital outcome
• Of patients admitted from the ED directly • To a ward, an ICU or SDU• Using EDLOS as a continuous measure • At the predefined cut-off value of 4 hours and
up to 8 hours• Outcome measures-Hospital outcome and
hospital LOS
Methods
• Retrospective cohort study done at• The Royal Adelaide Hospital Australia• Over 4 years from Jan 2004 to Dec 2007• Human Research Ethics committee approved• 43778 patients met the criteria• 43484 patients for final data analysis (99.3%)• 294 patients (0.7%) were omitted
Inclusion criteria
Patients with all of the following were included • Age > 15 years• Admitted from the ED directly to a ward, the ICU
or SDU• EDLOS less than 24 hPatients were divided into the following categories,
based on discharge location from the ED• Ward (direct admission from the ED to a ward)• ICU (direct admission from the ED to the ICU)• SDU (direct admission from the ED to the SDU)
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with any of the following:• Death while in the ED• Admitted from the ED directly to the operating theatre, coronary care unit, burns unit• Admission to the ED short stay ward, including
those subsequently admitted to a ward, ICU or SDU
• ED source of admission was another hospital• Patients sent home from ED
Statistics• Statistical analysis involved comparison of medians using two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov and
permutation tests• Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the
various ED and demographic factors affecting mortality
• In-hospital outcome was assessed using EDLOS with the cut-off of 8 hr
• Analyses were carried out using the R statistical language (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria,2011)
% Patients remaining in the ED
All patients Ward ICU SDU
At 4 hours 85.9% 87.7% 27.7% 67.9%
At 8 hours 41.1% 42.3% 6.8% 20.5%
Median EDLOS
ICU SDU Ward
> 4 hours 19.4% 52.1% 77.9%
> 8 hours 5.2% 15.5% 32.6%
Footer For Table 1 & 2
Median EDLOS & Mortality
All patients Ward ICU SDU
Median EDLOS
7.12 h 7.19 h 2.36 h 5.07 h
Alive 7.12 h 7.18 h 2.41 h 5.04 h
Dead 7.10 h 7.44 h 2.26 h 5.46 h
p- Value 0.65 <0.01 <0.08 <0.07
% Patients whose hospital outcome is death and EDLOS
All patients Ward ICU SDU
<4 hours 19.5% 10.1% 73.1% 24.6%
<8 hours 60.1% 53.9% 93.1% 72.5%
Median EDLOS and death as hospital outcome
ICU SDU Ward
> 4 hours 18.3% 66.7% 81.8%
> 8 hours 5.3% 24.6% 46.1%
Hospital Mortality of patients with & without EDLOS >8 h
All patients Ward ICU SDU
EDLOS < 8h 4.1% 3.2% 23.6% 7.2%
EDLOS > 8h 3.9% 3.7% 23.9% 10.6%
p- value 0.16 <0.01 0.52 0.09
Median LOS in correlation with EDLOS
All patients Ward ICU SDU
Hospital LOS in days
4.0 3.9 7.4 6.8
ICU/SDU in days
1.6 0.9
EDLOS – mortality predictor
Single regression model
Key points EDLOS
• Patients admitted to ICU had shortest EDLOS• EDLOS for patients admitted to ICU or SDU
was not significant among survivors and those who died
• Majority of ED patients were ward patients with lower urgency and longest EDLOS- more critical care beds and ICU patients prioritised
EDLOS & mortality• EDLOS is a continuous variable cut-off set at 8h• Longer EDLOS among those who died in the
patients admitted from the ED to ward• Shorter EDLOS among those who died in the
patients admitted from the ED to ICU• EDLOS was a significant independent predictor for
mortality for patients admitted from the ED to SDU• EDLOS was not a significant predictor of hospital
mortality• EDLOS potentially modifiable factor
Golden 4 hour rule
• Important time based harm minimisation • Performance measure set for patients • Admitted from the ED• Rapidly adopted• Pros and cons• Less relevant for ICU patients
Strengths of this study
• Examined EDLOS across groups of patients admitted from a single acute hospital ED
• Explored the association of EDLOS and outcome of patients from the ED to a ward, ICU or SDU
• First study for specifically differentiate for SDU patients
Weaknesses of this study
• Single centre study• Diverse ED population not covered• Different country • Difficult to generalise the findings• Staffing, funding, bed situation issues
Take home message
• EDLOS is not a significant predictor of mortality
• EDLOS is modifiable
Discussion