Outcome Based Accountability Fiscal Policy Studies Institute Santa Fe, New Mexico WEBSITES BOOK ORDERS .

Outcome BasedAccountability

Fiscal Policy Studies Institute

Santa Fe, New Mexico

WEBSITES

www.resultsaccountability.com

www.raguide.org

BOOK ORDERS www.trafford.com

www.amazon.com

Outcome Based Accountabilityis made up of two parts:

Performance Accountabilityabout the well-being of

CUSTOMER POPULATIONSFor Programs – Agencies – and Service Systems

Population Accountabilityabout the well-being of

WHOLE POPULATIONSFor Communities – Cities – Counties – States - Nations

THE LANGUAGE TRAPToo many terms. Too few definitions. Too little discipline

Benchmark

Target

Indicator Goal

Result

Objective

Outcome

Measure

Modifiers Measurable Core Urgent Qualitative Priority Programmatic Targeted Performance Incremental Strategic Systemic

Lewis Carroll Center for Language DisordersMeasurable urgent systemic indicatorsCore qualitative strategic objectivesYour made up jargon here

DEFINITIONS

Children born healthy, Children succeeding in school, Safe communities, Clean Environment, Prosperous Economy

Rate of low-birthweight babies, Percent 16 & 19 yr. olds with 5 A-C GCSE’s, crime rate, air quality index, unemployment rate

1. How much did we do? 2. How well did we do it?

3. Is anyone better off?

OUTCOME or RESULT

INDICATOR or BENCHMARK

PERFORMANCE MEASURE

A condition of well-being for children, adults, families or communities.

A measure which helps quantify the achievement of an outcome.

A measure of how well a service, agency or service system is working. Three types:

= Customer Outcome

Popu

latio

nPe

rfor

man

ce

From Ends to Means

ENDS

MEANS

From Talk to ActionPo

pula

tion

Perf

orm

ance

OUTCOME or RESULT

INDICATOR or BENCHMARK

PERFORMANCEMEASURE

Customer outcome = EndsService delivery = Means

From Talk to Action

POPULATIONACCOUNTABILITY

For Whole Populationsin a Geographic Area

Every Child Matters – Children Act

Outcomes for Children and Young People

Being Healthy: enjoying good physical and mental health and living a healthy lifestyle.

Staying Safe: being protected from harm and neglect and growing up able to look after themselves.

Enjoying and Achieving: getting the most out of life and developing broad skills for adulthood.

Making a Positive Contribution: to the community and to society and not engaging in anti-social or offending behaviour.

Economic Well-being: overcoming socio-economic disadvantages to achieve their full potential in life.

1. Health & Emotional Well-being

2. Quality of life

3. Making a positive contribution

4. Exercising choice & control

5. Freedom from discrimination & harassment

6. Economic well being

7. Personal dignity & respect

(8. Effective leadership – means)

(9. Effective commissioning - means)

Our Health, Our Care, Our Say – White Paper

Outcomes for Adults

Source: A New Outcomes Framework for Performance Assessment of Adult Social Care 2006 - 07

Georgia

Lehigh Valley, PADayton, OH

Santa Cruz, CA

REPO

RT C

ARDS

New Zealand Kruidenbuurt Tilburg, Netherlands

Portsmouth, UK

Country Neighborhood

City

Leaking Roof(Results thinking in everyday life)

Experience:

Measure:

Story behind the baseline (causes):

Partners:

What Works:

Action Plan:

Inches of Water

? Fixed

Not OK

Turning the Curve

Figure 5: Pre and Post Turning the Curve ExerciseBreakdown of offences committed for the data periods 01/01/04 -

31/03/04 and 01/01/05 - 31/03/05

0255075

100125150175200225250

01/01/04 - 31/03/04 01/01/05 - 31/03/05

Criminal Damage Public Order Theft Overall Decrease

Paulsgrove, Portsmouth, UK

Youth Nuisance

Newcastle, UK

- 37%

Performance Accountability

For Services, Agencies and Service Systems

How much did we do?

Program Performance Measures

How welldid we do it?

Is anyonebetter off?

Quantity Quality

Effe

ct

Effo

rt

# %

How much did we do?

Education

How well did we do it?

Is anyone better off?

Quantity Quality

Effe

ct

E

ffort Number of

studentsStudent-teacher

ratio

Number of 16 olds with 5 A to C

GCSE’s

Number with goodschool attendance

Percent of 16 yr olds with 5 A to C

GCSE’s

Percent with goodschool attendance

How much did we do?

Drug/Alcohol Treatment Program

How well did we do it?

Is anyone better off?

Number ofpersonstreated

Unitcost of

treatment

Number of clientsoff of alcohol & drugs - at exit - 12 months after exit

Percent of clientsoff of alcohol & drugs - at exit - 12 months after exit

How much did we do?

Home Care Services

How well did we do it?

Is anyone better off?

# of persons served

# visits

# visits per week

Ave length of visit

% service users who say the service is reliable, flexible, respectful, friendly (SPRU))

Rate entry into hospital, residential or nursing care

% carers report the service helped the service user remain at home

# entry into hospital, residential or nursing care

# carers report the service helped the service user remain at home

LR

UR

How Population

&Performance Accountability

FIT TOGETHER

Contributionrelationship

Alignmentof measures

Appropriateresponsibility

THE LINKAGE Between POPULATION and PERFORMANCE

POPULATION ACCOUNTABILITY

Being Healthy Rate of low birth-weight babiesStaying Safe Rate of child abuse and neglect Enjoying and Achieving Percent with 5 A-C GCSE’s

CUSTOMEROUTCOMES

# ofinvestigations

completed

% initiatedwithin 24 hrs

of report

# repeatAbuse/Neglect

% repeatAbuse/Neglect

PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY

POPULATIONOUTCOMES

Child Protection Service

IN CLOSING

“If you do what you always did,

you will get what you always got.”

Kenneth W. JenkinsPresident, Yonkers NY NAACP

THANK YOU !

WEBSITES:

www.raguide.orgwww.resultsaccountability.com

BOOK ORDERS: www.trafford.comwww.amazon.com