Top Banner
Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft COMP4332 Wong Po Yan
17

Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft COMP4332 Wong Po.

Dec 29, 2015

Download

Documents

August Pitts
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft COMP4332 Wong Po.

Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter

Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft

COMP4332Wong Po Yan

Page 2: Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft COMP4332 Wong Po.

Introduction

▪ Significant correlation between personality and real-world behavior–Music taste–Formation of social relations

▪ Predicting the personality of users in Twitter

Page 3: Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft COMP4332 Wong Po.

Why Twitter?

▪ Previous study on Facebook–The nature of online interactions does not

significantly differ from that of real world interactions

▪ A different platform–See anything of anybody unless users protect their

updates

▪ Popular

Page 4: Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft COMP4332 Wong Po.

Twitter Users▪ Four types with Five measures– Listeners : follow many users–Popular: are followed by many–Highly-read: are often listed in other’s reading list– Influential: ▪ Klout score

Whether a user’s tweet is being clicked, replied or retweeted▪ TIME score

TIME magazine ranking measure that combines one’s popularity on both Tweeter and Facebook using the formula

(2a + b) / 2, where a = number of Twitter followers,b = number of Facebook social contact

Page 5: Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft COMP4332 Wong Po.

Personality

▪ The Big Five Personality Test–An individual is associated with fives scores that

correspond to the five main personality traits

▪ Traits–Openness–Conscientiousness–Extraversion–Agreeableness–Neuroticism

Page 6: Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft COMP4332 Wong Po.

myPersonality

▪ Facebook users are able to take a variety of personality and ability test

▪ Users can give consent to share their personality scores and profile information–40%–Only few hundreds of those have posted links to

their Twitter accounts.

▪ The Big Five Personality Test

Page 7: Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft COMP4332 Wong Po.

Goal

Relationship between

▪ Personality Traits (Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism)

▪ Two additional attributes (age, sex)

And

▪ Five user characteristics (followings, followers, listings, influential score (Klout, TIME))

Page 8: Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft COMP4332 Wong Po.

Data Collection

▪ Sample users: 335– Have specified their twitter accounts on Facebook profile– Have done the Big Five Personality Test using

myPersonality in Facebook– Have shared the results and profiles on Twitter

▪ Data– Number of followers– Number of following – Number of times that the user has been listed in others’

reading list

Page 9: Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft COMP4332 Wong Po.

Data Processing:Logarithm

▪ Number of followed users

▪ Number of followers

▪ Listings

▪ Two influential scores (Klout, TIME)

▪ AgeWhy?

▪ Corresponding distributions are not normal

▪ Logarithm transformation accounts for the violation of normality

Page 10: Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft COMP4332 Wong Po.

Pearson Product Moment Correlation

▪ A measure of the linear relationship between two random variables

▪ Formula

▪ Range: [-1, 1]

Page 11: Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft COMP4332 Wong Po.

Results

Listener & Popular▪ Extraversions– 0.13 for Listener– 0.15 for Popular– Extroverts

▪ Neuroticism– -0.17 for Listener– -0.19 for Popular– Emotionally stable

▪ Age– 0.28 for Listener– 0.37 for Popular– Tend to be older

Listener and Popular are extroverts and emotionally stable. They tend to be older.

Page 12: Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft COMP4332 Wong Po.

Results

Highly-read–Openness▪ 0.17

Highly-read are people who are imaginative, spontaneous and adventurous.

Page 13: Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft COMP4332 Wong Po.

Results

Influential

▪ Klout– Extraversion: 0.15– Neuroticism: -0.03

▪ TIME– Conscientiousness: 0.18– Extraversion: 0.25– Neuroticism: -0.20– Age: 0.39

Influential are people who are extroverts, emotionally stable, ambitious and resourceful. They are very likely to be older.

Page 14: Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft COMP4332 Wong Po.

Model for Prediction▪ Regression analysis

▪ 10-fold cross validation using M5’ Rule– M5’ is based closely on M5– M5 (Model tree) combines a conventional decision tree with

the possibility of linear regression functions at the leaves– M5’ is the enhanced algorithm that improves with handling

missing values and enumerated attributes

▪ Root Mean Square Error–Compare the difference between predicted values and

observed values–On score scale [1,5], maximum RMSE = 0.88–Error is low Accurate

Page 15: Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft COMP4332 Wong Po.

Conclusion

▪ All user types are emotionally stable

▪ Most of the users are extroverts, except Highly-read people

▪ Listener, Popular and Influential people tend to be older

▪ Influential people tend to be ambitious, but seem to be not very agreeable

▪ Highly-read people tend to be adventurous and imaginative

These inferences have long been supported informally by intuition but have been difficult to make it precise.

Page 16: Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft COMP4332 Wong Po.

Suggestions

▪ Marketing–Marketing strategy is closely related to consumer personality–E.g. Select ads to which the user is likely to be most receptive

▪ User Interface Design–Match the “look and feel” of a social media site to personality

traits

▪ Recommender Systems–Product recommendation–E.g. Recommend music to users under given well-established

relationship between personality and music taste

Page 17: Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter Daniele Quercia, Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, Jon Crowcroft COMP4332 Wong Po.

Q & A