Top Banner
Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor
24

Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

Dec 20, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I

or

Microlenses as Stellar Probes

By

Jonathan Devor

Page 2: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

Overview of the talk

The problem with “vanilla” microlensing

“Non-vanilla” microlensing effects:

(1) Parallax

(2) Limb darkening

(3) A planet around the lens

(4) A planet around the source

Page 3: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

The problem with vanilla

Not enough information in “vanilla” lensing events.

0.1

0.30.5

Observable parameters:

1. Time of max (t0)

2. Time scale (tE)

3. Max magnification

PLANET data + fits

Paczynski curves:

Page 4: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

…now add some sprinkles and fudge

tE

EROS BLG-2000-5tstar

Page 5: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

The solution

Scale of source:Source star

characteristics:{color, magnitude

and spectrum}

Dsource

Rsource

θsource

Scale of lens:

sourcestartstart 2Relative proper

motion (lens-

source):

Et

EEEt

Astrometry: Rlens

Dlens

Mlens

Page 6: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

Astrometry of weighted mean position

Lens at origin Source at origin

Page 7: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

SIM: “Will determine the positions and distances of stars several hundred times more accurately than any previous program.”

Baseline 10 m

Wavelength range 0.4 - 0.9µm

Telescope Aperture 0.3 m diameter

Orbit Earth-trailing solar orbit

Mission Duration 5 years (launch in 2009)

Narrow Angle Astrometry 1 µas single measurement accuracy (goal)

Limiting Magnitude 20 mag (goal)

Page 8: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

(1) Parallax

images

source centroid

Centroid path

Astrometric path

Page 9: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

Observations: OGLE 99-BLG-32

Page 10: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

(2) Limb darkening

You see deeper into a star at the center of it’s disk, then you see at it’s edge.

Hot

Cool

The limb of a stellar disk is almost always redder/dimmer than the center.

Page 11: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

Chromatic Lensing

Page 12: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

Observations of Hα absorption line equivalent widths

Page 13: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

Binary Lenses – brief recap

Page 14: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

Choose the line of sight

Page 15: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

Observation: EROS BLG-2000-5

Page 16: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

(3) Planet around the lens

Page 17: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

…animated

Page 18: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

Planet inside the Einstein radius

Page 19: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

…now take a closer look

Page 20: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

Changing the location of the planet

Page 21: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

(4) A planet around the source

Source: G0 V star at 8 kpc

AUa

RRv

kpcDMM

Jupplanetkm

lenssolarlens

0467.0

27.1;60

7;3.0

sec

AUa

RRv

kpcDMM

Jupplanetkm

lenssolarlens

03.0

5.1;150

6;3.0

sec

AUa

RRv

kpcDMM

Jupplanetkm

lenssolarlens

03.0

5.1;150

6;3.0

sec

Page 22: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

Planet finding comparison

Planet around the lens

Planet around the source

Underlying method Use the background source as a projector

Use the intervening lens as a natural telescope

What can be learned

Mass

Location (orbit)

Location (orbit)

Radius

Brightness

Atmosphere

Rings, etc.

follow-up no no

difficulty Comparably easy

(even for small planets)

Very difficult ~1% photometric effect

Page 23: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

Summary

Very little information can be learned from purely “vanilla” lensing. You need other effects to break the degeneracy and pin down the system’s physics.

The parallax effect occurs in all cases, but can only be readily detected in very long time scale events (~year) and when the lens is relatively nearby.

Through lensing it is possible to learn about source star’s limb darkening, surface features and planets. Unfortunately the latter is very difficult to do.

Planets around the lensing star should be far easier to detect, unfortunately we won’t be able to learn that much about them.

A microlensing event only happens once, so “real-time astronomy” is required to gather enough data before it’s gone. (You snooze- you loose)

Page 24: Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.

References

Afonso, C., et al., Photometric constraints on microlens spectroscopy of EROS-BLG-2000-5, Astronomy and Astrophysics, v.378, p.1014-1023 (2001)

An, J. H., First Microlens Mass Measurement: PLANET Photometry of EROS BLG-2000-5, The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 572, Issue 1, pp. 521-539 (2002)

Cassan, A., Probing the atmosphere of the bulge G5III star OGLE-2002-BUL-069 by analysis of microlense H alpha line, astro-ph/0401071 (2004)

Evans, N. W., The First Heroic Decade of Microlensing, astro-ph/0304252 (2002) Gaudi, B. S., Microlensing Searches for Extrasolar Planets: Current Status and Future Prospects,

astro-ph/0207533 (2002) Gaudi, B. S. et al., Microlensing Constraints on the Frequency of Jupiter-Mass Companions:

Analysis of 5 Years of PLANET Photometry, The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 566, Issue 1, pp. 463-499 (2002)

Gaudi, B. S. et al., Angular Radii of Stars via Microlensing, The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 586, Issue 1, pp. 451-463 (2003)

Gould, A., Applications of Microlensing to Stellar Astrophysics, The Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Volume 113, Issue 786, pp. 903-915 (2001)

Graff, D. S., and Gaudi, B. S., Direct Detection of Large Close-in Planets around the Source Stars of Caustic-crossing Microlensing Events, The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 538, Issue 2, pp. L133-L136 (2000)

SIM homepage: http://planetquest.jpl.nasa.gov/SIM/sim_index.html

The animations were created by Scott Gaudi