Top Banner
OS 352 3/4/08 I. Exam I feedback / Strategy Review II. Selection Interviews III. Validity IV. Downsizing & Outsourcing
26

OS 352 3/4/08

Jan 08, 2016

Download

Documents

ganya

OS 352 3/4/08. I. Exam I feedback / Strategy Review II. Selection Interviews III. Validity IV. Downsizing & Outsourcing. Three HRM Strategy Theories. Contingency perspective Best practices Resource-based. Contingency Perspective. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: OS 352  3/4/08

OS 352 3/4/08

I. Exam I feedback / Strategy Review

II. Selection Interviews

III. Validity

IV. Downsizing & Outsourcing

Page 2: OS 352  3/4/08

Three HRM Strategy Theories

Contingency perspective

Best practices

Resource-based

Page 3: OS 352  3/4/08

Contingency Perspective

Organizations will be most successful when strategies “fit” environments.

Organizations will be most successful when HR strategies “fit” organizational strategies.

Firms should tailor HR activities.

Page 4: OS 352  3/4/08

Diagram of the Contingency Perspective

OrganizationalStrategies

OrganizationalStrategies

OrganizationalCharacteristics

OrganizationalCharacteristics

OrganizationalCapabilities

OrganizationalCapabilities

EnvironmentEnvironment

HR Strategies

Consistency

Consistency

Co

nsi

sten

cy

Co

nsisten

cy

ImprovedFirm

Performance

ImprovedFirm

Performance

FitFit

FitFit

FitFit

FitFit

Page 5: OS 352  3/4/08

How to Interpret the Diagram

Contingency Perspective says that firms that match their HR activities / strategies to the 4 boxes (organizational strategies, environment, organizational characteristics, organizational capabilities) will be more successful than those that do not.

Page 6: OS 352  3/4/08

Best Practices Approach

Some practices work better than others (e.g., variable pay bonuses for managers).

Some practices are more progressive than others (e.g., paid family leave).

Firms should imitate HRM leaders.

Page 7: OS 352  3/4/08

Workforce Diversity ManagementIncludes policies and procedures that support the view that all employees’ views and cultures are to be valued and respected.

Cross-cultural training; sensitivity training Team training Work/life programs (e.g., elder care) Top management commitment to diversity Equal employment opportunity efforts Diversity scorecards External diversity advisory panel

Page 8: OS 352  3/4/08

Workforce Diversity Management: What is Most Effective?

A study by Kalev, Dobbin, & Kelly (2006) of 708 establishments over 30 years found that …

Diversity training aimed at reducing subtle biases was the least effective approach to increasing the diversity of a firm’s managers

Mentoring and networking programs were somewhat effective in diversifying a firm’s managerial ranks

Establishing responsibility for diversity outcomes was the most effective approach to increasing the diversity of a firm’s managers Affirmative action Diversity committees Diversity staff

Page 9: OS 352  3/4/08

Interview Types

Nondirective

Interviewer has great discretion in choosing questions; conversation may be open-ended.

Structured

Consists of a predetermined set of questions to be asked in a predetermined order. Questions are based upon a thorough job analysis.

Page 10: OS 352  3/4/08

Structured Interviews: Behavioral

Situational question: interviewer describes a situation likely to arise on the job, then asks the candidate what s/he would do in that situation.

Behavior description question: interviewer asks the candidate to describe how he or she handled a type of situation in the past.

Page 11: OS 352  3/4/08

Your Turn (please do in JD groups)

For the job analyzed in the job description exercise:

Write 3 interview questions that you would ask in interviews of applicants for this position. Make sure at least two questions pertain to applicant behaviors.

How would you validate the behavioral questions using the 3 types of validity just discussed?

Page 12: OS 352  3/4/08

Demonstrating the Job-Relatedness (Validity) of Selection Methods

Employer must document that the selection method(s) are related to performance in specific jobs and/or work roles. Job analysis or substitute. Validation.

KSAs that can be easily learned during a brief training program should not be used as screening criteria.

KSAs required in future jobs or roles can be used provided that a majority of individuals reach these jobs.

already discussed

today

Page 13: OS 352  3/4/08

Reliability

The extent to which a measurement is free from random error.

Example: A vision test that provides a person with the same results 3 days in a row is reliable. A vision test that provides vastly different results is unreliable.

Note: must have reliability to have validity.

Page 14: OS 352  3/4/08

Validity

The extent to which performance on a measure (such as a test score) is related to what the measure is designed to assess (such as job performance).

Example: The extent to which student performance on OS 352 Exam I is related to students’ degree of learning in the course.

Page 15: OS 352  3/4/08

Validation: Evidence that selection method(s) are job-related

3 Types:

1) Criterion-related validity

A measure of validity based on showing a substantial correlation between test scores and job performance scores.

2) Construct validity -

The selection method measures the KSAOs required by the job and excludes KSAOs not required by the job.

3) Content validity -

Consistency between the test items and the kinds of situations or problems (i.e., tasks and duties) that occur on the job.

Page 16: OS 352  3/4/08

Criterion-Related Validity

Page 17: OS 352  3/4/08

Face Validity

Extent to which a selection test or device makes sense or seems fair to the applicants.

Example: questions about one’s political opinions may appear invalid to applicants for a chef job.

Page 18: OS 352  3/4/08

Turnover

When the ee leaves the firm, either voluntarily (ee initiates and er would prefer to retain) or involuntarily (er initiates).

Downsizing represents involuntary turnover in the form of a firm eliminating large numbers of jobs with the goal of enhancing the firm’s performance.

Page 19: OS 352  3/4/08

Downsizing Considerations

Amount of suffering for “survivors” and employees who are downsized.

Speed – downsizing is a quick method.

Impact on “survivor” productivity and firm reputation.

Downsizing costs: severance packages, HR and supervisor time, lost productivity, unemployment insurance hikes.

Page 20: OS 352  3/4/08

Workers’ Adjustment Retraining and Notification Act (WARN)

Requires 60 days’ notice to employees in firms with more than 100 employees whose closing or mass layoffs will affect at least 50 full-time employees. Plant closing Mass layoff

of 30-days or more if 550+ ees of 50-499 ees if 1/3 or more of workforce laid off

Sale of business combined w/ closing or layoff – there is always an er responsible for notice.

Page 21: OS 352  3/4/08

Organizational Justice and Downsizing

Outcome fairness – ees perceive that the outcome of who gets downsized and who does not is fair.

Procedural justice – ees perceive that fair methods were used to determine who was downsized and who was not.

Interactional justice – ees perceive that the firm considered ees’ feelings when they implemented the downsizing

Page 22: OS 352  3/4/08

Examples of Insensitivity

(low interactional justice) in Downsizing

Inacom laid off 5,000 ees by having them call an 800 number recording that told them they were laid off immediately.

Chrysler workers learned that they were laid off when their ID badges no longer operated the entrance gates.

Amazon.com announced job cuts by sending emails to ees’ homes.

Page 23: OS 352  3/4/08

Outsourcing

Contracting with another organization to perform a broad set of services.

Example: Clarkson outsources its food services and OIT operations to other firms. The ees of these firms work on the Clarkson campus.

Page 24: OS 352  3/4/08

Off-Shoring

A firm locates its jobs in a country different from its headquarters or primary location, usually to save on labor costs.

Example: In 2004, EDS, headquartered in Texas, offshored approximately 15,000 jobs, primarily programmers, to countries with cheaper labor costs than the U.S.

Off-shoring may or may not be combined with outsourcing.

Page 25: OS 352  3/4/08

Terms You Should Know Structured interview

Generalizability

Turnover

Downsizing

Outsourcing

Off-shoring

Interactional justice

WARN

Page 26: OS 352  3/4/08

You Should be Able To …

Generally assess the fairness, reliability, and validity of various selection processes for particular jobs.

Understand how to make a downsizing process fair and effective.