Page 1
Origin, Evolution, Purpose and Antiquity of Intricate and
Geometric Patterns in Indian Rock Art: Prehistoric to the
Present
Saleem Shaik1
1. Indian Council of Historical Research, 35 Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi - 110 001,
India (Email: [email protected] )
Received: 04 August 2020; Revised: 13 October 2020; Accepted: 01 December 2020
Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 8.1 (2020): 303-324
Abstract: Since the discovery of rock paintings in India in 1867, the beauty and intricacy of the intricate
and geometric patterns found in the Indian rock art sites have always remained enigmatic and a puzzle to
understand about their origin, evolution and purpose including antiquity of such kind of representations.
Numerous theories have been proposed regarding the emergence and evolution including the purpose and
antiquity of such kind of representations. Present paper highlights about the factors in the emergence and
evolution of intricate and geometric patterns in order to understand about the purpose and antiquity of
the same and suggests about the importance of carrying out ethnographic study of such kind of rock art
motifs among the indigenous communities in order to understand about the abovementioned aspects.
Keywords: Prehistoric, Geometric Patterns, Antiquity, Evolution, Modern Art, Heritage
Management, Ethnographic Approach
Introduction Despite 153 years of research on various aspects of rock art in India, the origin (factors
in the emergence of rock art), purpose and antiquity (age) of rock paintings have still
remained much debated aspects (Mathpal 1984, 1992; Shaik 2015, 2017) whereas
depiction of the intricate and geometric patterns to decorate the rock shelters can be
considered as the reason behind the emergence of intricate and geometric patterns
(Tyagi 1992; Sonawane 2002) including to decorate the body portion of animal and
square shaped female figures found at various rock art sites in different parts of the
Indian Sub-continent (Shaik 2020a in press). So far more than 7500 painted rock shelters
have been reported from different parts of India (Figure 1a). In India, prehistoric
paintings were discovered as early as 1867. Since then, due to the efforts of various
scholars useful information on various aspects was brought to light and published. On
the basis of the rock art attributes/parameters such as study of rock painting’s style,
superimpositions, theme, subject matter, patina, colour and context of rock paintings,
one can suggest a relative chronological sequence for Indian rock art until the paintings
and other art forms can be dated directly. On the basis of the excavations at Bhimbetka
Page 2
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 8.1: 2020
304
the ‘S’ shaped human figures in green colour were assigned to Upper Palaeolithic
period (Wakankar 1976, 1984a&b, 1992, Wakankar and Brooks 1976) and Wakankar
established a relative chronological sequence to different types of rock paintings and
assigned them to Upper Palaeolithic, Mesolithic, Early Agriculturists and Cattle
Keepers phase (Neolithic and Chalcolithic), Historic and late Historic periods. But the
study of rock paintings found in the rock art sites located in the ‘S’ belt of central India
has revealed that the ‘S’ shaped human figures are found superimposed on the
intricate pattern at Jaora (Figure 1b) and similar representations were also reported
from Lakhajoar, Ladi Ki Karar, Firengi and Kathotia (Tyagi 1992).
Figure 1a: Map of rock art sites in India
Page 3
Shaik 2020: 303-324
305
Figure 1b: ‘S’ shaped human figures in green colour superimposed on intricate pattern
in red colour at Jaora
Figure 2: ‘S’ shaped human figures in dancing postures at Kharwai (a), Lakhajoar (b)
and Hathitol shelter of Raisen-Ramchhajja
According to Tyagi (1992), “intricate patterns are the earliest rock paintings in India”.
Opinions among scholars differ regarding the antiquity and purpose of intricate and
geometric patterns found in the rock art sites of India. The intricate patterns found at
various rock art sites are extremely fragmentary and almost merged with the surface of
the rock. This might have led Mathpal (1984) and Neumayer (1983) to consider them as
the earliest rock paintings. According to Wakankar (1976, 1984, 1992 Wakankar and
Brooks 1976), “the ‘S’ shaped dynamic dancing human figures in green and dark red
colours belongs to earliest group of rock paintings”. A few more ‘S’ shaped dancing
human figures reported by Kumar (1981) were also assigned to the Upper Palaeolithic
period (30,000-12,000 years B.P). Despite recent research, the precise chronological
bracket of Upper Palaeolithic period in India is also yet to be established firmly, thus
Page 4
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 8.1: 2020
306
adding to the confusion about the antiquity of associated rock art and art objects
whereas the microlithic assemblages found in different parts of India have been dated
between 45,000 years Before Present (Mishra et al 2013) and 35,000 years Before Present
(Clarkson et al 2009). Tyagi has also observed that in a number of rock shelters, intricate
patterns were executed on the surface of rock shelters and they are not superimposed
on any of the earlier paintings. Interestingly, the ‘S’ shaped dynamic dancing human
figures painted in green were found superimposed on some of the intricate patterns in
red colour such as those at Jaora, and similar representations found at Ladi-Ki Karar,
Cheel Dant, Firengi and Kathotia rock art sites are poorly preserved and could not be
identified and photographed (Tyagi 1992) (Figure 1b). On the basis of his study, Tyagi
(1992) also supports the theory that was proposed by Wakankar, that the ‘S’ shaped
dynamic dancing human figures in green colour can be assigned to the Upper
Palaeolithic, but they are not the earliest paintings in India.
Figure 3: Serpent figure decorated with Geometric pattern at Sagar
Page 5
Shaik 2020: 303-324
307
Figure 4: Square shaped human figures at Chanttaneshwar (a) and Nalda (b) in Hadoti
Plateau in south-eastern Rajasthan
Figure 5: Geometric patterns at Urden (a) and Bhimbetka (b) in Madhya Pradesh
On the basis of his studies, Tyagi (1992), who re-examined the rock paintings
thoroughly in the Betwa source region, i.e., in the semi-circular ranges of the Vindhyas
passing through Raisen, Sehore and Bhopal districts and the comparative study of
these rock paintings with those found in the rock shelters of Gupha Masir indicates
Page 6
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 8.1: 2020
308
that the simple geometric designs engraved on ostrich eggshells of the Upper
Palaeolithic period were also represented in the form of pictographs. Depiction of a
serpent figure decorated with intricate patterns in red colour covering both ends and
the central part of a rock shelter was found at Kathotia. According to Tyagi (1992), “the
intricate patterns filled in on the body portion of the serpent figure probably developed
into the tradition of depicting intricate spiral patterns”. According to Woodhouse,
“these intricate spiral patterns are the results of trance experience of the shamans and
were painted when the rock artist was under the influence of trance conditions,
hallucination or that these designs were painted by the shaman” (in Tyagi 1992).
Figure 6: Intricate patterns at Ramtol (a) and Hathitol (b) in Hadoti Plateau, south-
eastern Rajasthan
Figure 7: Geometric patterns at Chapria (a-d) in Hadoti Plateau, south-eastern
Rajasthan
Page 7
Shaik 2020: 303-324
309
Figure 8: Geometric patterns at Nalda (a and b) in Hadoti Plateau, south-eastern
Rajasthan
Figure 9: Geometric patterns at Gararda (a&d), Gopichand Ka Chhajja (b) and Chapria
(c) in Hadoti Plateau, south-eastern Rajasthan
Prof. W. Davis suggests that these designs were painted when the artist was under the
influences of physically stressful conditions and their close association with the
animals and a part of their belief system, which is an important vision of hunters,
shamans or artists of a particular community whereas the absence of the ethnographic
parallels makes it difficult to prove this assumption (Tyagi 1992). Tyagi suggests that
Page 8
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 8.1: 2020
310
Indian pictographs can be compared with the anthropomorphic figures found in South
Africa whereas the spiral designs found in India do not have any similarity with those
found in the reported rock art sites across the globe. The spiral intricate patterns found
in the rock art sites of India were variously termed as: - P. Francis, an American scholar
called them as the ‘Spiral Greek Key’ and ‘Ogee designs’, Neumayer called ‘Honey-
comb Patterns’ (1983), Mathpal as ‘Geometric and Maze Patterns’ (1984), and
Wakankar called them as ‘endless designs’ (Wakankar and Brooks 1976). But the spiral
intricate designs found in India have a distinct similarity with conventional designs
engraved or carved on the bone and ivory plaques, pendants and bracelets found at
Mezin, a site in Crimea, Russia (Clark 1977).
Figure 10: Geometric patterns at Chapria (a), Gararda (b) and Gopichand Ka Chhajja (c)
in Hadoti Plateau, south-eastern Rajasthan
Tyagi considered the enigmatic spiral intricate designs as being unique to the
subcontinent and called them as ‘emblemic inseriation’. He arrived at the conclusion
that the intricate patterns belong to the earliest period, as they were always painted on
the virgin surface of the rocks. According to S.K. Pandey, certain aspects of the
paintings such as the colour, patina, superimposition, style, theme, flora and fauna can
help to date the rock paintings.
The study of rock paintings found in various countries suggests that the rock paintings
of the pre-figurative phase precede those of the figurative phase in many instances.
Depictions in the pre-figurative phase such as the geometric motifs, concentric circles,
spiral designs with variations, and intermediate forms were drawn in a restricted range
of elements. The above mentioned curvilinear motifs are the basic characteristics of all
forms of archaic rock art (Bednarik 1994). This can be applied to the rock paintings of
the pre-figurative phase as well, which forms the most conspicuous feature of the rock
Page 9
Shaik 2020: 303-324
311
paintings of this kind found so far in India (Neumayer 1993). In several paintings the
intricate patterns identified as ‘Labyrinthine’ were designed as rhombic meanders and
honey-comb patterns with different designs. Similar depictions cover a large space of
the rock shelter surfaces, and in many rock shelters they are not superimposed by the
earlier paintings (Tyagi 1992).
Figure 11: Geometric patterns at Bakan (a), shields decorated with geometric patterns
at Dharwa (b) and Kanyadeh (c) in Hadoti Plateau, south-eastern Rajasthan
Chronologically, the symbolic motifs of the pre-figurative or non-iconic phase/category
were followed by those of the figurative or iconic phase/category. The paintings of the
pre-figurative phase such as the ‘S shaped dynamic dancing human figures in green
colour were found superimposed on the intricate patterns of earlier paintings in red
colour. The ‘S’ shaped dynamic dancing human figures of the earliest phase were
transformed into perfect ‘S’ shapes during the figurative phase, and the paintings of
this style do not depict any other activities except dancing and hunting scenes such as
those at Bhimbetka, Kharwai, Lakhajoar, Firengi, Kathotia and Raisen (Figure 2a, b &
c). They are known for their vigorous dynamism which is not found in rock paintings
Page 10
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 8.1: 2020
312
of later periods. This is the striking feature of paintings of the figurative phase. In this
regard, the depiction of an ostrich in green colour, found in one of the rock art sites in
central India, was noticed by S.K. Pandey (see in Tyagi 1992) can prove the authenticity
of the earliest style.
Figure 12: Square shaped human figures at Gopichand Ka Chhajja (a), Chattaneshwar
(b and d) and Bhimlat (c) in Hadoti Plateau, south-eastern Rajasthan
Study of rock paintings found in Hadoti Plateau (Shaik 2014a&b) and recent
documentation and study of rock art sites in Raisen District of Madhya Pradesh
suggests that there are categories of rock paintings instead of phases and similar
patterns/designs were used for different purposes during different cultural periods
and suggests that the intricate and geometric patterns were also used to decorate the
body potion of animal figures including those of rectangular shaped female figures.
(Shaik 2017, 2020 in press, Shaik and Chauhan 2019b, 2020 in press). Among other
patterns/designs, the spiral rhomboid design was repeatedly drawn on the body
portion of huge wild boar, elephant, rhinoceros and deer which are uncommon and the
author of the present paper is of the opinion that such kind of patterns were used to
Page 11
Shaik 2020: 303-324
313
decorate the body portion of animal figures including those of square shaped female
figures so that they will look more beautiful whereas representations of square shaped
female figures suggest about the identity of particular indigenous community. The
abovementioned animal figures with such kind of patterns were also identified as
‘Deified animals’ (Misra 1986).
Figure 13: Human figures carrying nets or baskets filled with prey at Urden (a),
Kathotia and Jaora (b), Kharwai (c), and using fish nets decorated with geometric
patterns at Lakhajoar (d) in Madhya Pradesh
According to Tyagi (1992), “even during the Mesolithic period the tradition or practice
of decorating animal figures with intricate or geometric patterns on their bodies was
continued to some extent” whereas the study of rock paintings found in Hadoti Plateau
in south-eastern Rajasthan and Raisen District of Madhya Pradesh suggests that they
were mainly used to decorate the body portion of animal figures ranging from
Mesolithic to Early Agriculturists and Cattle Keepers Phase (Neolithic and
Chalcolithic) and it continued right up to Historic period with slight variations of
decorative designs which can be seen in the form of various designs on the horse rider
figures including soldiers equipped with swords and different types of shields (Shaik
2014a&b, 2020 in press, Shaik and Chauhan 2019b, 2020 in press). The earliest paintings
are in a highly fragmented state and are covered with a thick layer of patina, in such
conditions it is very difficult to study the subject matter of the rock paintings.
Depictions of serpent figures were drawn only during the prehistoric period.
According to A.K. Ghosh, “the serpent figures are of guardian animal of the habitats,
Page 12
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 8.1: 2020
314
i.e., caves and rock shelters occupied by the prehistoric people and indicate that they
were depicted as a totem or for the pacification of the deity” (see in Tyagi 1992).
Figure 14: Square shaped female figures decorated with geometric patterns at
Karmodiya (a) and (b) shown as carrying a basket at Putli Karar in Raisen District,
Madhya Pradesh
Figure 15: Engraved Ostrich eggshells found at various sites in central India (a) and
engraved Chert core found at Chandravati in Rajasthan (b)
Some of the serpent figures in dark red colour are of the earliest period and the body
portions of such figures were decorated with intricate or geometric patterns. They are
quite big in size 20 m in length and 35 cm in width were found in the rock shelters of
Kathotia whereas another serpent figure decorated with geometric patterns was found
at Sagar in Madhya Pradesh (Figure 3) whereas one more representation of a serpent
figure found at Chanttaneshwar in Hadoti Plateau of south-eastern Rajasthan was
Page 13
Shaik 2020: 303-324
315
drawn without any body decorations and it was painted close to the square shaped
human figures decorated with geometric patterns (Figure 4a) (Shaik 2008, 2014a&b).
Sometimes the intricate or geometric patterns drawn on the body portion of serpent
figures are clearly visible such as those at Sagar (Figure 3). Similar patterns drawn on a
serpent figure in white colour was found in the rock shelters of Cheel Dant. It was
assigned to a later period immediately after the earliest paintings (Tiwari 1984).
Figure 16: Horse riders equipped with swords and shields decorated with different
types of designs at Pengawan (a&b), Gelpur (c) and Satkunda (d) in Raisen District,
Madhya Pradesh
The intricate patterns slowly developed into intricate spiral patterns. These depictions
were mostly painted in dark red colour and they have been assigned to a second stage
of the earliest style of paintings. The subject of the pictographs of this stage (2nd stage
known as Mesolithic period) shifted to the depiction of hunters as stick-shaped human
figures accompanied by rectangular shaped female figures with infillings of intricate or
geometric patterns can be seen at various rock art sites such as Putli Karar and
Karmodiya in Raisen District of Madhya Pradesh (Figure 14 a&b) (Shaik and Chauhan
2019b and 2020 in press). These were shown in a dancing pose around or near the
animal figures decorated with similar geometric patterns. Some of the female figures
with rectangular shaped body were shown as carrying basket-like objects or using
digging sticks to kill rats hiding inside the burrows and fishing scenes and their head
portions were mostly shown as conical and they were shown in various activities can
be seen at Jaora and Lakhajoar (Figure 13b&d) and Putli Karar (Figure14a) in Madhya
Pradesh and at Nalda (Figure 4b) in Hadoti Plateau in south-eastern Rajasthan. The
Page 14
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 8.1: 2020
316
human figures are not so dynamic and look stiff with developed arms and legs without
fingers or toes. The paintings of hunters have decorations on their elbows and a
feather-like decoration on their head. Depictions of hunters were found in camouflage
and similar figures were found superimposed on the intricate or geometric patterns,
and were also shown with infillings on their body portion. This is a unique
composition of the paintings of this period (Mesolithic period). The camouflage looks
very natural and the intricate or geometric patterns underlying these animal figures
give an impression of foliage around them. The emergence of the spiral patterns in a
developed style without any stylistic changes has led scholars to consider them as an
intriguing aspect of this kind of rock art (Tyagi 1988, 1992).
Figure 17: Alpana designs at (a) Golpur (b) in Hadoti Plateau in south-eastern
Rajasthan, (c) and evolved into modern Worli art (d)
Discussion In the initial stages of rock art studies, the beauty and the intricacy of the intricate and
geometric patterns including those of splendid spiral intricate patterns might have
convinced experts to consider as the oldest rock paintings in India (Tyagi 1992,
Page 15
Shaik 2020: 303-324
317
Mathpal 1984, Neumayer 1983). But, according to Tyagi (1992), the spiral intricate
patterns are more than being just the purpose of decorative. But the study of intricate
as well as geometric patterns found in the rock art sites of Hadoti Plateau in south-
eastern Rajasthan (Shaik 2014a&b, 2020 in press) and Raisen District of Madhya
Pradesh suggests that the intricate/geometric patterns were used to decorate the rock
shelters as well as to decorate the body portion of animal figures including those of the
square shaped male and female figures (Shaik 2020 in press, Shaik & Chauhan 2020 in
press) or such representations of human figures with different types of body
decorations might also indicate about the identity of different indigenous communities
who occupied the rock shelters in different parts of India during different cultural
periods. This can be attested by studying the concentration of similar
intricate/geometric patterns including those of the square shaped male and female
figures found in different rock art zones. Ethnographic study of such patterns among
various indigenous communities may also help in understanding the purpose of the
intricate and geometric patterns (Shaik 2020 in press).
According to Tyagi (1992), “the depiction of intricate/geometric patterns was started
when the prehistoric people observed various kinds of patterns on the body portion of
serpents/snakes and it might have attracted them to draw such kind of patterns which
can be seen at various rock art sites located in different parts of India” whereas the
study of intricate and geometric patterns found in the rock art sites in Hadoti Plateau
in south-eastern Rajasthan (Shaik 2014a&b, 2017, 2020 in press) and recent study of rock
art sites in Raisen District of Madhya Pradesh (Shaik and Chauhan 20191&b, 2020)
suggests the same proposition and supports Tyagi’s observations (1992) about the
origin and evolution of intricate/geometric patterns, and also suggests that the
depiction of various types of human figures such as those of ‘S’ shaped human figures
and different types of animal figures with or without body decorations of
intricate/geometric patterns as well as those of x-ray style animal figures was started
from the same time as those of intricate/geometric patterns (Shaik 2017), and the rock
paintings of the non-iconic and iconic phases can be considered as categories instead of
phases (Shaik 2017, 2020 in press). Because such kind of patterns were found at
Bhimbetka (Figure 5a) and Urden (Figure 5b), Karmodiya, Barla, Ghatla rock art sites
in Madhya Pradesh (Shaik & Chauhan 2019a&b, 2020 in press) and in the rock art sites
of Hadoti Plateau in south-eastern Rajasthan such as Hathitol (Figure 6a), Ramtol
(Figure 6b), Chapria (Figure 7a,b,c&d), Nalda (Figure 8a&b), Gararda (Figure 9a&d),
Gopichand Ka Chhajja (Figure 9b), Bhimlat and Chapria (Figure 9c) whereas two
among the four geometric patterns in red colour are superimposed on faded geometric
patterns in white colour were found at Chapria (Figure 10a; Figure 7b,c&d).
Three geometric patterns found at Gopichand Ka Chhajja and Chattaneshwar are
highly faded whereas the geometric pattern found at Gararda (Figure 9d) has knots or
decoration-like designs at the corners which may suggest that it was either used as
hunting net or for decorative purpose. But the representations of intricate or geometric
patterns found at Bhimbetka (Figure 5b) in Madhya Pradesh and Nalda (Figure 8a&b)
Page 16
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 8.1: 2020
318
in Hadoti Plateau were drawn in small shelters and similar representations suggests
that they were painted for decorative purpose or to indicate the identify of particular
indigenous community/ies. Study of concentration/s of such kind of representations
located in different parts of India will help in understanding about the purpose of
similar representations (Shaik 2020 in press).
The purpose of similar geometric patterns found at Gararda (Figure 10b) and
Gopichand Ka Chhajja (Figure 10c) is not clear, but they are similar to snake figures
decorated with geometric patterns whereas the purpose and function of a small
rectangular shaped geometric pattern found at Gopichand Ka Chhajja (Figure 10c) is
also not clear to understand why such kind of geometric patterns are drawn.
Ethnographic study of intricate and geometric patterns including those of other rock
art motifs such as snakes, plants, human and animal figures and other symbols found
in the form of tattoos of different indigenous communities may suggest about the
purpose of such representations, but one has to be careful while trying to interpret
such kind of rock art motifs as there might have been changes during different time
periods spanning a long time in the evolution and purpose of such motifs.
Continuity of Intricate/Geometric Patterns from Prehistoric to Recent: Study of
intricate and geometric patterns found in the rock art sites of Hadoti Plateau in south-
eastern Rajasthan (Shaik 2008, 2014&b, 2020 in press) and in Raisen District in Madhya
Pradesh (Shaik and Chauhan 2020 in press) suggests that the depiction of such patterns
has continued well into the Early Agriculturists and Cattle Keepers Phase in the form
of decorations on the shields such as those at Gararda, Dharwa and Kanyadeh rock art
sites located in Hadoti Plateau of south-eastern Rajasthan (Figure 11a,b&c ) and
continued right up to Historic and late Historic periods in the form of shields
decorated with various designs which can be seen at numerous rock art sites located in
different parts of India. Similar soldiers’ figures shown as equipped with different
types of shields decorated with different patterns suggests that they belong to different
groups (Figure 16a-d).
Similar geometric patterns have simultaneously continued and evolved into Alpana
designs during the Historic and late Historic periods can be seen at numerous rock art
sites such as Chamaria, Ratanpura, Satkunda, Morpani, Putli Karar, etc. (Figure
17a,&c) in Madhya Pradesh and Golpur (Figure 17b) in Hadoti Plateau, south-eastern
Rajasthan as well as those of modern art forms such as those of Worli art (Figure 17d),
and later continued in the form of decorative designs known as Rangavalli or Rangoli,
Kollam, Muggu, etc. that can be seen in front of the houses as well as painted on the wall
portions of huts/houses located close to various rock art sites in different parts of India.
But few Rangavalli or Rangoli kind of decorative designs have religious affinity as well
which may suggest that their purpose was changed during the Historic and late
Historic periods. But a few representations of decorative designs are drawn during the
festivals such as Sankranti, Diwali or Deepavali and Dussera, and decorated with flowers,
balls made of cow dung, etc. can be seen in the southern parts of India were mainly
Page 17
Shaik 2020: 303-324
319
intended to ward off the evil. But one has to be cautious while using ethnographic
approach to understand the purpose of various types of geometric patterns.
Representations of human figures decorated with geometric patterns were shown as
holding nets and traps filled with prey have been found at few rock art sites in India
such as Bhimlat in Hadoti Plateau in south-eastern Rajasthan (Figure 12c), Urden
(Figure 13a), Kathotia and Jaora (Figure 13b), Kharwai (Figure 13c) whereas using
fishing nets with ropes shown in the form of geometric patterns were found at
Lakhajoar (Figure 13d). Similar representations were drawn during different cultural
periods can be seen at few rock art sites in central India.
Representations of human figures drawn during the Early Agriculturists and Cattle
Keepers Phase were shown as holding axes whereas shields decorated with geometric
patterns such as those at Bakan, Dharwa and Kanyadeh in Hadoti Plateau in south-
eastern Rajasthan (Figure 11a,b&c) (Shaik 2008, 2014a&b) and other representations of
horse riders and soldiers figures drawn during Historic and late Historic periods can
be seen at rock art sites located in Madhya Pradesh were found at Satkunda, Kharwai,
Bhimbetka, Lakhajoar, Pengawan, Chamaria, Gelpur, Urden, Putli Karar, etc (Figure
16a-d) (Shaik and Chauhan 2019b, 2020 in press) and they are similar to those found in
the rock art sites of Pachmarhi Hills in Hoshangabad District (Dubey 2001).
But the continuity of these patterns from prehistoric to Historic and late Historic
periods and up to recent time period also suggest that they were used for various
purposes such as decorative, identity as well as for religious purposes. The
ethnographic study of such kind of patterns among different indigenous communities
will be helpful to understand about the purpose of such kind of motifs.
An engraved Chert core found at Chandravati in Rajasthan (Figure 15b) (Sonawane
1992; 1995-96; Bednarik 1993) and engraved Ostrich eggshells and beads found at
various sites (Figure 15a) in association with Upper Palaeolithic and Microlithic
assemblages (Sali 1980, 1984; Kumar et al 1988, 1990,1992; Mishra 2004, et al 2013) as
well as representations of intricate/geometric patterns including those of male and
female human figures (Figure 14a&b, Figure 4a&b) and animal figures (Figure 4a) can
be seen at various rock art sites in India whereas the serpents and snakes can be seen at
few rock art sites and all these representations suggests that they were drawn for
decorative purpose. But a few geometric patterns found at Bhimbetka in Raisen District
of Madhya Pradesh (Figure 5a) (Shaik 2020 in press, Shaik and Chauhan 2019b, 2020 in
press,) and Nalda (Figure 8a&b) in Hadoti Plateau in south-eastern Rajasthan (Shaik
2008, 2014a&b) suggests that they were either used for decorative purpose or to
indicate the identity of different indigenous communities who had occupied the rock
shelters during different time periods.
In course of a long time from prehistoric to Historic and late Historic periods the
depiction of intricate/geometric patterns was continued and they have also evolved
and continued right up to recent time period can be seen in the form of Worli art, etc.
Page 18
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 8.1: 2020
320
Antiquity of Intricate/Geometric Patterns: In the absence of absolute dates it is very
difficult to assign absolute date/s to intricate and geometric patterns including those of
animal as well as different types of human figures and serpents/snakes. A few efforts
have resulted in establishing a few dates (Agrawal & Kharakwal 1994; Sharma 1996;
Ravindran et al 2012) and a few U-Series and 14C dates ranging from 15.0±9.7 to
5190±310 years BP (Banerjee & Chakravarty 2014; Bednarik et al. 2005) and 5000 years
BP to an engraving (Tacon et al 2013). But establishing absolute dates to oldest rock
paintings such as intricate/geometric patterns, different types of animal and human
figures and serpents/snakes has still remained to solve the disputes about the age of
rock art in India (Shaik 2015).
Heritage Management: Recent documentation and study of 25,466 rock paintings
found in 34 rock art sites located in Raisen District of Madhya Pradesh suggests that it
is not only essential to establish a chronometric sequence to different types of rock
paintings ranging from Upper Palaeolithic to Historic and late Historic periods before
they disappear or destroyed due to natural as well as anthropogenic factors, but also
suggests to take preventive measures in order to protect the rock art sites for the future
generations as 10,034 figures among the 25,466 figures documented in 34 rock art sites
are faded beyond recognition (Shaik and Chauhan 2019b, 2020 in press).
Ethnographic Approach: It is essential to carry out ethnographic study of different
types of rock art motifs among various indigenous communities located in different
parts of India in order to understand about the purpose/s of the rock paintings, but also
to save this precious heritage for the forthcoming generations.
Acknowledgements I am thankful to Indian Rock Art Research Centre, a part of Indian Numismatic,
Historical and Cultural Research Foundation, Anjaneri, Nashik, Maharashtra for
allowing me to participate in the documentation of rock art sites in Hadoti Plateau,
south-eastern Rajasthan and to work for my doctoral dissertation. I am thankful to
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Mohali for awarding a Post-
Doctoral Fellowship to work on rock art of Raisen District, Madhya Pradesh. I am
thankful to Indian Council of Historical Research, New Delhi for awarding the Senior
Academic Fellowship. I am thankful to K.P. Singh, Narayan Paliwal from Rajasthan
Vidyapeeth, Udaipur and Vivek Singh Gehlawat and Ravi Devra for helping me in the
documentation of rock art sites in Raisen District, Madhya Pradesh.
I am also thankful to Rajeev Lochan Chaubeyji and his family members from Raisen
and Avinash, son of Mudgalji from Kharwai, Valaram Prajapati, Sevaram, Aniket
Chidar, Malkhan Singh Ajay Singh, and Uddham Singh for assisting me during visits
to various rock art sites. I am thankful to Zulfiqar Ali, Vijay Sharma, Bhopal Circle of
Archaeological Survey of India and Dr Rajesh and Dr Anuradha Panda of Indira
Gandhi Rashtriya Manav Sangrahalay, Bhopal, Paliwalji, DFO of Obaidullaganj and
Agrawal SDFO, Raisen Division for allowing me to document various rock art sites in
Page 19
Shaik 2020: 303-324
321
Raisen District, Madhya Pradesh. Line illustrations given in the manuscript have been
reproduced from Eriwn Neumayer’s book Lines on Stone. I am thankful to Erwin
Neumayer.
References Agrawal, D.P and J.S. Kharakwal. 1994. Use of Scientific Techniques in India Rock Art
Studies. Purakala 5 (1-2): 67-69.
Banerjee, R & S. Chakravarty. 2014. Absolute Dating of a Time Marker from the
Satpuras An Appraisal through Uranium Series for Central Indian Rock
Art, in Suitable Techniques in Dating Rock Art, Malla B (Ed.), pp. 169-189,
New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts.
Bednarik, R.G. 1994. Art Origins. Anthropos 89: 169-80.
Bednarik, R.G., Giriraj Kumar, Alan Watchman & Richard G Roberts. 2005. Preliminary
Results of the EIP Project. Rock Art Research 22 (2): 147-197.
Clark, G. 1977. World Prehistory in New Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, p.102, Fig 39.
Clarkson Chris, Michael Petraglia, Ravi Korisettar, Michael Haslam, Nicole Boivin,
Alison Crowther, Peter ditchfield, Dorian Fuller, Preston Miracle, Clair
Harris, Kate ConnelI, Hannah James & Jinu Koshy. 2009. The Oldest and
longest enduring microlithic sequence in India: 35,000 years of modern
human occupation and change at the Jwalapuram Locality 9 rock shelter.
Antiquity (2009): 326-348.
Dubey, Meenakshi. 2001. Rock Paintings of Pachmarhi Hills, in Rock Art in the Old
World. Ed. M.Lorblanchet. New Delhi: Aryan Books International.
Kumar, G., Ashok Sahni, Ramesh Pancholi & Geeta Narvare. 1990. Archaeological
Discoveries and A Study of Late Pleistocene Ostrich Egg-shells and Egg-
Shell Objects in India. Man and Environment 15 (1): 29-40.
Kumar, G., Geeta Narvare & Ramesh Pancholi. 1992. Ostrich Eggshell Objects and
Engraved Pieces: New Evidence for Upper Palaeolithic Art in India, in Rock Art in
the Old World, M. Lorblanchet (Ed.), Pp. 193-202. New Delhi: Indira Gandhi
National Centre for Arts.
Kumar, G., R.K. Pancholi & Geeta Narvare. 1988. Engraved Ostrich Egg-Shell Objects-
New Evidences of Upper Palaeolithic Art in India. Rock Art Research 5 (1):
43-53.
Mathpal, Y. 1984. Prehistoric Rock Paintings of Bhimbetka, Central India. New Delhi:
Abhinav Publication.
Mathpal, Y. 1992. Rock Art Studies in India, in Rock Art in the Old World M. Lorblanchet
(Ed.), Pp. 207-14. New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts.
Mishra Sheila, Naveen Chauhan & Ashok K. Singhvi. 2013. Continuity of Microblade
Technology in the Indian Subcontinent Since 45 ka: Implications for the
Dispersal of Modern Humans. PLoS ONE 8 (7).
Mishra, S., S.B. Ota & S. Naik. 2004. Late Pleistocene Ostrich Egg Shell Bead
Manufacture at Khaperkhera, District Dhar, Madhya Pradesh, India, Paper
Page 20
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 8.1: 2020
322
Presented at the RASI-2004 International Rock Art Congress (28 Nov. to 2
Dec. 2004), Agra.
Misra, V.N. 1986. Bhimbetka: ‘Reflexion of Life in Cave Art’, Science Age 4 (6): 17-26.
Neumayer, E. 1983. Prehistoric Indian Rock Paintings. New Delhi: Oxford University
Press.
Neumayer, E. 1993. Lines on Stone: The Prehistoric Rock Art of India. New Delhi: Manohar
Publishers.
Ravindran, T.R, A.K. Arora, M. Singh & S.B. Ota. 2012. On-and Off-site Raman study of
rock shelter paintings at world-heritage site of Bhimbetka. Journal of Raman
Spectroscopy 44: 108-113.
Saleem Shaik and P. R. Chauhan. 2019a. Preliminary report of new rock art sites in the
Betwa source region of Raisen, Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies
in Archaeology 7: 252-265.
Saleem Shaik and P. R. Chauhan. 2019b. Documentation and Study of 34 Rock Art Sites
in Raisen District, Madhya Pradesh, India, in Human and Heritage: An
Archaeological Spectrum of Asiatic Countries (Felicitation to Professor Ajit
Kumar), S. V. Rajesh, G. S. Abhayan and Preeta Nayar (Eds.), pp. 541-565.
New Delhi: New Bharatiya Book Corporation.
Saleem Shaik and P.R. Chauhan. 2020. Documentation and Study of 34 Rock Art Sites in
Raisen District, Madhya Pradesh, India. Indian Numismatic, Historical and
Cultural Research Foundation, Anjaneri, Nashik (in press).
Saleem Shaik. 2008. Study of Early Rock Art and Associated Archaeological Cultures in S-E
parts of Rajasthan with Special Reference to Harauti Plateau. Unpublished Ph.D.
Thesis submitted to the Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research
Institute, Pune.
Saleem Shaik. 2014a. Study of Rock Art and Associated Archaeological Cultures in
Harauti Plateau, South Eastern Rajasthan, in Rock Art: Recent Researches and
New Perspectives Volume I (Festschrift to Padma Shri. Dr. Yashodhar
Mathpal) Ajit Kumar (Ed), Pp. 134-163. New Delhi: New Bharatiya Book
Corporation.
Saleem Shaik. 2014b. Study of Early Rock Art in Harauti Plateau in South-Eastern
Rajasthan, India: New Perspectives. Heritage: journal of multidisciplinary
studies in Archaeology: 2 (2014): 749-771.
Saleem Shaik. 2015. Importance of Scientific Studies in Indian Rock Art: Problems and
Future Perspectives. Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in
Archaeology 3: 665-691.
Saleem Shaik. 2017. Review of Rock Art Studies in India: Origin, Interpretation and
Chronological Aspects, in Kailashnath Hethu (Essays in Prehistory,
Protohistory and Historical Archaeology) Festschrift to Shri K. N Dikshit,
Ajit Kumar, S. V. Rajesh, G.S. Abhayan (Eds), pp. 59-82. New Delhi:
Bharatiya Kala Praksashan.
Saleem Shaik. 2020. Study of Female Figures in Indian Rock Art with Special Reference
to Raisen District, Madhya Pradesh, India: Identity, Stylistic and
Page 21
Shaik 2020: 303-324
323
Chronological Aspects. Journal of History, Art and Archaeology volume 1 (in
press).
Sali, S.A. 1980. Stone Age Sequence at Patne, District Jalgaon, Maharashtra. Unpublished
Ph.D. Dissertation submitted to the Deccan College Post-Graduate and
Research Institute, Pune. University of Poona.
Sali, S.A. 1984. Role of Open –Air Sites in the Region of Rock Shelter Sites, in
Chakravarty, K.K. (Ed). Rock Art of India, Pp. 201-215. New Delhi: Arnold
Heinemann.
Sonawane, V.H. 1992. Significance of the Chandravati Engraved Core in the Light of
Prehistoric Art of India, in M. Lorblanchet (Ed.), Rock Art in the Old World,
Pp. 273-283. New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts.
Sonawane, V.H. 1995-96. Symbolism of the Engraved Design on the Mesolithic Core of
Chandravati. Pragdhara 6: 33-39.
Sonawane, V.H. 2002. Rock Art of India, in Recent Advances in Indian Archaeology, ICHR
Monograph Series 6 (K. Paddayya Ed.), Pp. 266-294, New Delhi: Indian
Council of Historical Research.
Sonawane, V.H.1984. An Important Evidence to Date Rock Paintings of Mesolithic
Period, in Chakravarty, K.K. (Ed.), Rock Art of India, Pp. 61-63. New Delhi:
Arnold Heinemann.
Taçon, P.S.C. Nicole Boivin, Michael Petraglia, James Blinkhorn, Allan Chivas, Richard
G. Roberts, David Fink, Thomas Higham, Peter Ditchfield, Ravi Korisettar
and Jian-xin Zhao. 2013. Mid-Holocene age obtained for nested diamond
pattern petroglyph in the Billasurgam Cave complex, Kurnool District,
southern India. Journal of Archaeological Science (2013).
Tiwari, S. 1984. Twenty Five Years of Rock Paintings Exploration in the Betwa Source Region:
A Re-Appraisal, in Chakravarty, K.K. (Ed.), Rock Art of India: Paintings and
Engravings, Pp. 228-38. New Delhi: Arnold Heinemann.
Tyagi, G.S. 1988. ‘Comments on Dr. Kumar et al. Paper’, Rock Art Research 5 (1): 49-50.
Tyagi, G.S. 1992. Decorative Intricate Patterns in Indian Rock Art, in M. Lorblanchet (Ed.),
Rock Art in the Old World, Pp. 303-317. New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National
Centre for Arts.
Wakankar, V.S and R.R.R. Brooks. 1976. Stone Age Paintings in India. Bombay: D.P.
Taraporawala Sons and Co.
Wakankar, V.S. 1976. Presidential Address (Prehistoric Section), Indian Society for
Prehistoric and Quaternary Studies Archaeology Conference. Jaipur.
Wakankar, V.S. 1978. Chalcolithic Cultures of Malwa. Prachya Pratibha 4 (2): 1-32.
Wakankar, V.S. 1984a. Bhimbetka and Dating of Indian Rock Paintings, in
Chakravarty, K.K. (Ed) Rock Art of India: Paintings and Engravings, Pp. 44-56.
New Delhi: Arnold Heinemann.
Wakankar, V.S. 1984b. Rock Art of India, in Archaeology and History: Essays in Honour
of Shri A. Ghosh. B.M. Pande and B.D. Chattopadhyaya (Eds.), Pp. 583-97.
New Delhi.
Page 22
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 8.1: 2020
324
Wakankar, V.S. 1988. Comment on G. Kumar, G. Narvare & R. Pancholi, ‘Engraved
Ostrich egg-shell Objects: New Evidence for Upper Palaeolithic Art in
India’. Rock Art Research 5: 51.
Wakankar, V.S., 1992. Rock Paintings in India, in Lorblanchet, M. (Ed.), 1992. Rock Art in
the Old World, Pp. 319-336. New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for
Arts, New Delhi.