WATER GOVERNANCE IN CITIES KEY FINDINGS 6 th OECD Water Governance Initiative Paris, 2 November 2015 Aziza Akhmouch & Oriana Romano
WATER GOVERNANCE IN CITIES
KEY FINDINGS
6th OECD Water Governance Initiative Paris, 2 November 2015
Aziza Akhmouch & Oriana Romano
OECD Survey “Water Governance in cities”
Key questions
METHODOLOGY
OBJECTIVES
• Challenges to urban water governance • Performance indicators • Governance gaps • Best practices in urban water governance
• Factors of urban water governance • Allocation of roles and responsibilities • Interconnection with water-related sectors • Tools and strategies to overcome fragmentation
TARGET
• Questionnaire to 48 cities from OECD and emerging economies
• Policy makers at local and national level • Water managers at city and metropolitan level
Analytical framework for assessing
water governance in cities
Source : OECD, 2015 forthcoming, Water Governance in OECD Cities, OECD Publishing, Paris
The 3Ps co-ordination framework
Cities complex
interactions
People
Places Policies
Source : OECD, 2015 forthcoming, Water Governance in OECD Cities, OECD Publishing, Paris
PEOPLE
Facts
Multiplicity of governmental actors with shared prerogatives on water
• Central governments : policy making (e.g. water security 65%) and regulatory functions ( e.g. drinking water 52%)
• Local government ( policy making, information, financing e.g. drainage/ drinking water)
• Other sub-national governments: information/monitoring/evaluation
Multiplicity of non-governmental actors with a stake in urban water governance
• Service providers (main counterparts of city departments, 79%)
• Industry/ Business ( not frequent interaction )
• Irrigators and their association ( rare interactions)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%Service providers
Regional / provincialgovernment
Local government
Advisors
Media
Customers and theirassociations
Civil society
Central government
Business/ IndustrySub-national institution
dealing specifically with water
Trade unions and workers
Science, academia andresearch centres
Regulator
Inter-municipal /metropolitan authority
Financial actors
International organisations
Irrigators and theirassociations
Frequent interactions between cities and stakeholders
Obstacles
• Complexity of issues at hand
• Resistance to change
• Lack of funding for engaging stakeholders Source : OECD, 2015 forthcoming, Water Governance in OECD Cities, OECD Publishing, Paris
Opportunities
• Building trust and ownership • Securing the willingness to pay for water services • Raising awareness on current and future water challenges • Ensuring the accountability of city managers and service providers to end
users and citizens • Managing conflicts on water allocation • Ensuring the political acceptability of different ownership models • Setting convergent objectives across policy areas.
Focus on Stakeholder engagement
Focus on Multi-level approaches to water governance
• Minimising overlaps • Avoiding duplications • Identifying grey areas • Vertical and horizontal co-ordination
PLACES
Facts
75% 73%
63% 58%
54% 54%
44% 42%
8%
Issues generating interdependencies between
cities and surrounding areas • Major issues: water quality (75%) , flood control (73%), wastewater treatment ( 63%).
• Ageing/lacking infrastructure and extreme events are the main water-related challenges for surveyed cities (92% and 83%)
• For OECD countries as a whole,
investment requirements in the water supply and treatment sector are expected to increase by almost 50% by 2030 (OECD, 2007)
• Cities coordinate with rural areas and other municipalities: 46% of cities implemented inter-municipal co-ordination mechanisms
• Lack of relevant scale for investment ( administrative gap)
• Mismatch between hydrological and administrative boundaries (administrative gap)
Obstacles
Source : OECD, 2015 forthcoming, Water Governance in OECD Cities, OECD Publishing, Paris
Opportunities
Focus on Rural- Urban partnerships
• Building synergies for a more efficient use of water • Managing trade-offs and building trust and
capacities • Integrate water management between cities and
their hinterland
Focus on Metropolitan governance
• Enhancing information sharing and costs saving for projects on water
• Integrate planning, policy making, strategy setting and service provision across municipalities
Source : OECD, 2015 forthcoming, Water Governance in OECD Cities, OECD Publishing, Paris
POLICIES
Facts
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%81%
77% 71%
56%
39% 38% 31%
Policy areas influencing water challenges in
surveyed cities • Land use and spatial planning (81%),
Energy (77%) and territorial development (71%) mainly influence water challenges in surveyed cities
• Surveyed cities coordinate across sectors through planning, but also through contracts (energy, agriculture); coordination groups (territorial development, environment)
Obstacles
• Lack of strategic vision across water related policy areas ( policy gap)
• Lack of institutional incentives for sectoral cooperation ( objective gap)
Source : OECD, 2015 forthcoming, Water Governance in OECD Cities, OECD Publishing, Paris
• Managing conflicts on water allocation
• Efficiently allocating resources
• Increasing capacity
• Strategic vision
Opportunities
Focus on policy complementarities
Coordination mechanisms
Conditionalities
Financial incentives
Joint programmes
Partnerships
Contracts
Legal requirements
Co-ordination groups
Planning
Environment
Spatial planning
Energy
Agriculture
Regional development
Land use
Water
Waste
Source : OECD, 2015 forthcoming, Water Governance in OECD Cities, OECD Publishing, Paris