Organisational analysis and energy planning - Main points and examples - Karl Sperling [email protected] 04-11-2011
Organisational analysis and energy planning
- Main points and examples -
Karl Sperling [email protected]
04-11-2011
2
Feedback from previous lecture - keywords • …
3
Main points
• Organisational analysis (OA) important throughout the whole research process
• At the outset: conceptualise the research problem
• Analysis: inform data collection; “complete as you go”
• As a result of the research; to draw conclusions
• Can be a form of “theory” or “worldview” à the way the researcher sees the world à great communication tool
4
Main points
• Internal and external actor networks of the organisation
• type and outcome of org. analysis depends very much on the research problem: org. analysis … in relation to what? What is the goal of the analysis?
• Roles and interests of actors/stakeholders can change depending on the topic of analysis
• Stakeholder figures: try to keep them simple (see example)
5
Examples of OA in project work • Stakeholder analysis:
o Introduction: Who is affected by the problem? o Discussion:
Who and what has to change and how in order to implement one or several solutions?
o Etc.
• SWOT analysis: o To compare different alternatives o As framework of an analysis (e.g. an energy plan as a
SWOT analysis) o To characterise the organisations, communities etc.
for which a project is prepared o Etc.
6
OA on different levels
• Internal: o “Inside” an organisation o How do internal processes have an affect on a
problem? o What needs to be changed internally in order to
implement certain solutions? Etc.
• External:
o Interaction of organisations in relation to a problem
• E.g. a stakeholder analysis can be carried out on the two levels
7
Other points on OA • Be conscious of who your audience is – which
organisations may have an interest in your project? Who are you doing a project for? (Not just AAU and your supervisors)
• Feedback from organisations will make a project more “realistic” • Sometimes “negative” feedback is very valuable! OA is also about “organisational awareness” – awareness of which organisational context a project is part of
8
How have I used organisational analysis: • As an analytical tool: how do things seem to work at the
moment? Which actors are responsible for which tasks? à“Actor-task” analysis; “Who does what, why and for whom?”
• As a normative tool: how could things work differently? Which actors should be involved? What should their tasks look like?
• “Technology-oriented” org. analysis: technological change at the centre
• Continuum: organisational analysis – institutional analysis – policy design etc.
9
Example #1:
Municipal energy planning
10
Research problem
• Context: 100% renewable energy systems à a number of specific technological changes
• Problem: How to plan and implement 100% RES?
• Two issues: “energy planning” and “technologies”
• How should energy planning look like in order to fulfil 100% RES? à First order “Actor-task” map
• How should specific technologies be implemented? à Second order “Actor-task” map
11
Current organisation of energy planning
• Simple model of how energy planning works in general
• State and municipalities have energy objectives
• There is little coordination
• Proactive municipalities run into barriers
• 100% RES planning is not approached strategically
12
How I think it should be: • Simple model of how
energy planning could work in general
• State and municipalities have the same energy objectives
• There is more coordination and cooperation
• Proactive municipalities provide feedback to central level
• 100% RES planning is approached strategically
13
First order actor-task map (normative) Tasks Actors
Ministry of Transport
Ministry of the Environment
Danish Energy Agency
Danish Enterprise and Construction Authority
Grass roots organisations
Local Government Denmark
Municipalities
Utility companies
Credit banks
Craftsmen and manufacturers
Citizens
Ministry of Climate and EnergyNational 100% renewable energy planning strategy
Research institutes
Danish Government
Ministry of Economic and Business Affairs
Ministry of Finance
Framework for strategic municipal energy planning
Technology- and activity specific legislation and support schemes
Consultants
Implementation of strategic municipal energy plans
Draft strategic municipal energy plans
Branch organisations and industry
Ministry of Taxation
• A bit too complex
• Too much information
• I tried to map all possible actors
• à split between first order and second order actor-task maps
• “Consciously ignore”
14
First order actor-task map Tasks Actors
Ministry of Transport
Ministry of the Environment
Danish Energy Agency
Danish Enterprise and Construction Authority
Grass roots organisations
Local Government Denmark
Municipalities
Utility companies
Credit banks
Craftsmen and manufacturers
Citizens
Ministry of Climate and EnergyNational 100% renewable energy planning strategy
Research institutes
Danish Government
Ministry of Economic and Business Affairs
Ministry of Finance
Framework for strategic municipal energy planning
Technology- and activity specific legislation and support schemes
Consultants
Implementation of strategic municipal energy plans
Draft strategic municipal energy plans
Branch organisations and industry
Ministry of Taxation
Tasks Actors
Danish Government
Relevant ministries & authorities
Local Government Denmark
Municipalities
Utility companies
Other local actors
Implementation of strategic municipal
energy plans
Strategic municipal
energy plans
Technology- and activity specific legislation and
support schemes
Framework for strategic municipal
energy planning
National 100% renewable
energy planning strategy
Research institutes
Consultants
Branch organisations and industry
Grass roots organisations
Other actor
Local actor
Central actor
Parliament
15
Wind power – second order map
16
Example #2:
Cradle-to-cradle islands and SWOT analysis
Pictures from: C2CI project and Samsø Energy Academy
17
A few buzzwords…
…ISLANDS
SWOT ANALYSIS FOR…
CRADLE TO CRADLE…
18
Cradle-to-cradle
• Waste equals food
• Use of solar energy
• Celebrate diversity
à Up until now an exclusively product-oriented approach
à From C2C products to C2C systems?
McDonough & Braungart 2002
19
SWOT analysis
SWOT is mainly applied in the private sector where it is important to clarify the factors that will make a company survive, profit and expand
in a competitive market Sørensen & Vidal 1999
SWOT in relation to C2C islands: • Materials • Water • Energy
20
SWOT analysis
Sørensen & Vidal 1999
21
SWOT analysis
Sørensen & Vidal 1999
22
Objectives
• To develop and conduct SWOT analysis together with the islands
• To support learning and decision-making processes on the islands
• To make technical knowledge more accessible
• “Interactive Energy SWOT tool” à energy model as part of the SWOT analysis
23
Design of the Int. Energy SWOT tool
24
Purpose of the Int. Energy SWOT tool 1. Learning about regional energy flows
2. Assisting in identifying and quantifying problems, inefficiencies and opportunities in the system; i.e. Strengths and Weaknesses
3. Identifying (technical) solutions beneficial from a systems perspective
4. Common “language” à comparisons and exchange of knowledge between the partner islands
25
Spiekeroog #1 • 18.73 km2
• ~800 inhabitants
• Tourism main source of income
• Electricity and natural gas supplied through cables/pipeline from mainland
26
Spiekeroog #2 • 17 km2 (90%) protected
• Nature protection and preservation of the old town (architecture of the houses etc.) have priority
• 2008: 615,000 overnight stays
• Vision: independent from mainland’s electricity supply
• Renewable energy share: 7% (mainly from 225 kW wind turbine)
• Energy conservation and photovoltaic power as possible options
27
Spiekeroog #3 • Biogas from sewage sludge as an option
• All heating based on individual gas boilers
• Cars are prohibited, a few electric cars exist
• Relatively constant ferry transport demand (2008: 416,00 passengers)
28
Spiekeroog #4 • Contact with a “key” person on the island
• SWOT tool was presented to the mayor this year
• Local teacher wants to use and develop it
• “People are too wealthy around here”
à Difference between Samsø and Spiekeroog
29
Feedback on the SWOT tool • The energy tool can be considered a partial success: some
islands used it; but sometimes structurual barriers to renewable energy
• “We have made a better model”
• In general not much feedback from islands regarding the specific content of the model… still too much complexity?
• Ongoing process…we will have to follow up on if and how the islands use the model
• Similar models for water and materials
30
Remarks • The Energy SWOT tool and the actual SWOT analysis are
interrelated and simultaneous processes
• The prerequisites and requirements on the islands limit/expand the (technology) choices to be included in the model
• The model can then show the effects of these choices
• If precise data do not exist, missing information has to be estimated
31
Remarks • SWOT analysis as strategy building tool à similar to other
strategic management tools
• SWOT can be an element of a research project…
• …SWOT can also be THE research project
à SWOT analysis can follow a problem-analysis-plan-implementation structure
32
Energy game • Learning through an interactive group exercise
33
34
Lessons learned • Learning by doing/using
• “simple/obvious” is a context dependent term
• When you let people participate/use your work you will get more direct feedback
• “The model is not user-friendly – you could do this and that to improve that.”
• “I learned that offshore wind power is more expensive than onshore wind power”