Top Banner
WAYS TO EMPOWER YOUR OR MAYO CLINIC Collaboration Communication The Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care Myrna Chang Innovative scrub design enhances patient safety Naomi Judd Tragic Illness Leads to a Healthcare Safety Crusade Volume 7, Issue 1 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 1 THE OR CONNECTION w 3 & Pink Glove Dance II Video Competition! Page 82 2012
100

OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Mar 03, 2016

Download

Documents

Medline's OR Connection Magazine, Volume 7, Issue 1 - FREE CE: Targeting Wrong Site Surgery Risks
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Covered Arms Are Compliant Arms

Medline innovation triumphs again.

The latest AORN and OSHA guidelines recommend that OR nurses who aren’t in gowns should wear long sleeves.

PerforMAX scrubs added an inner sleeve to keep arms covered without dangling cuffs—like on jackets—to contaminate sterile fields.

These sleeves are like the finest athletic undergear: cool, supportive and totally breathable. And because they’re PerforMAX, you get a fashionable layered look that’s comfortable and functional all shift long.

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. PerforMAX and greensmart are trademarks and Medline is a registered trademark of Medline Industries, Inc.

Part of Medline’s

Talk to your facility’s Medline rep or visit Scrubs123.com to find out more about PerforMAX scrubs.

PerforMAX scrubs

line of products.

MKT212065 / LIT1012 / 30M / QG5

WAYS TO EMPOWERYOUR OR

MAYO CLINICCollaboration Communication

TheAligning practice with policy to improve patient care

Myrna ChangInnovative scrub design enhances

patient safety

NaomiJudd Tragic Illness Leads to a Healthcare Safety Crusade

Volume 7, Issue 1

VOLUME 7, ISSUE 1

THE OR CONN

ECTION w

3& Pink Glove

Dance II VideoCompetition!

Page 82

2012

Page 2: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Subscribing to The OR Connection guarantees that you’ll continue to receive this magazine and won’t miss out on our industry updates and articles addressing on-the-job issues and patient safety.

We also welcome any suggestions you might have on how we can continue to improve The OR Connection! Love the content? Want to see something new? Just let us know!

To subscribe, simply go to www.medline.com/orconnection. You will need to provide: Your nameFacility and positionMailing address E-mail address

Never miss an issue of The OR Connection!Subscriptions are FREE!

CoverMyrna Chang, DHA, RN, CNORMyrna worked in collaboration with Medline to design an innovative new line of the industry’s first long-sleeved scrubs. The design was a response to AORN and OSHA guidelines, which advise non-scrubbed personnel to wear long sleeves in the OR to prevent skin shedding, which can lead to surgical site infection.

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 99

Preventing Surgical Fires Forms & Tools

Source: AORN Fire Safety Tool Kit. Copyright ©AORN, Inc. Denver, CO; 2011. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission.

Page 3: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

About MedlineMedline, headquartered in Mundelein, IL, manufactures and distributes more than 100,000 products to hospitals, extended care facilities, surgery centers, home care dealers and agencies and other markets. Medline has more than 800 dedicated sales representatives nationwide to support its broad product line and cost management services.

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. The OR Connection is published by Medline Industries, Inc. One Medline Place, Mundelein, IL 60060. 1-800-MEDLINE.

Contents

12

32

17

58

Developing and Launching a Long-Sleeved Scrub: Q&A with Myrna Chang of California’s O’Connor Hospital and Jennifer Walrich of Medline.

Mayo Clinic: Communication and Teamwork Set Them Apart. A private interview with CEO, Dr. Bill Rupp discussing the culture of safety at Mayo.

Targeting: Wrong Site Surgery Risks. Evidence-based, Innovative, new tool hits the bullseye to help reduce this never event.

Naomi Judd: How Her Tragic Illness Led to a Healthcare Safety Crusade. An interview with this country music icon and registered nurse about her experience with a needlestick.

Editor

Sue MacInnes, RD

Senior Writer

Carla Esser Lake

Creative Director

Michael A. Gotti

Clinical Team

Jayne Barkman, BSN, RN, CNOR

Lorri Downs, BSN, MS, RN, CIC

Margaret Falconio-West, BSN, RN, APN/CNS, CWOCN, DAPWCA

Kimberly Haines, RN, Certified OR Nurse

Rebecca McPherson, MSN, RN

Angel Trichak, BSN, RN, CNOR

Perioperative Advisory Board

Garry Crawford, MS, RN, CNORNorman Regional Health System, Oklahoma

Evangeline Dennis, RN, BSN, CNOR, CMLSOSpivey Station Surgery Center, Georgia

Linda Groah, MSN, RN, CNOR, NEA-BD, FAANAssociation of PeriOperative Registered Nurses, Colorado

Darvina L. Heichemer, BSN, CNORGwinnett Medical Center – Duluth, Georgia

Vivienne P Kaplan, RNAnaheim Regional Medical Center, California

Colleen Mattioni, MBA, RN, CNORHospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania

Julieann McIntyre, MSN, RN, CNORSouth Shore Hospital, Massachusetts

Susan A Miller, MSN, RN, CNORSt. Luke’s Hospital, Missouri

Susan S Phillips, MSH, RN, CNORUNC Hospitals, North Carolina

Jo Quetsch, MA, RN, NE-BCProvidence Sacred Heart Medical Center, Washington

Eleonora Shapiro, BSN, MHA, CNORMount Sinai Medical Center, New York

Pat Thornton, MS, RN, CNORSouthern Regional Medical Center, Georgia

Judith A. Townsley, MSN, RN, CPAN Christiana Care Health System, Delaware

Pat Thornton, MS, RN, CNORSouthern Regional Medical Center, Georgia

Judith A. Townsley, MSN, RN, CPAN Christiana Care Health System, Delaware

Page 4: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

4 The OR Connection

Visit Medline’s exhibit at the

2012 AORN Congress to learn more about:

q Sterillium Rub

q Medline University® EmpOweR education

q DVT prophylaxis system

q ClearCount RFID sponge

counting/tracking device

q OctylSeal tissue adhesive

q PerforMAX Scrubs

q Surgeon’s gloves

q IRiS (UVC disinfection)

q PerfecTemp patient warming device

q Procedural packs - standard and custom

q Gold Standard TIME OUT program

q Abby – Medline’s newest doll!

q CDS

q Drapes and gowns

q Surgical masks

Page 26

Contents (cont)...

Page 47

Page 70

Page 65

Page 75

Patient Safety

46 Patient Safety News

65 Medication Safety in the Operating Room:

What is Your Role?

OR Issues

26 You Have Now Crossed Over into the

Gray Zone

63 Exposure to Bloodborne Pathogens

68 Rounding Up Compliance

Special Features

7 Breast Cancer Facts 10 Prevention Above All Discoveries Grant

Program 47 Lean Tools and Concepts Reduce

Waste, Improve Efficiency 75 Judy Pickett: Running for Her Life 80 Medline’s AORN Breast Cancer Aware-

ness Breakfast

Caring for Yourself

70 Fear: How to Kill it Dead!

86 Healthy Eating:

Roasted Vegetables

Forms & Tools

89 One and Only Campaign

91 Sharps Safety Begins with You

92 20 Tips to Help Prevent Medical Errors

95 Six Steps to C. diff Prevention

96 First Aid for Exposure to Blood and

Bodily Fluids

99 Know Your Role in Preventing

Surgical FiresVisit us at booth #3407!

Page 5: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

I am especially excited because I have had the opportunity to talk to some amazing people that are making a difference in health care. Let’s start with Dr. William Rupp. He is the CEO of Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida. Dr. Rupp graciously allowed me to interview him on site and then walk the halls of Mayo Clinic with him. A sense of the patient comes first, a sense of pride, a sense of collaboration, a sense of a culture of safety…from the top down. Imagine the CEO walks you around the hos-pital for an hour and a half so that you take away all the glorious things that Mayo is doing.

Then there is Myrna Chang, the Director of Perioperative Ser-vices at O’Connor Hospital in San Jose, Calif. What is so special about Myrna? Myrna has recognized for a long time that the traditional scrub wear worn in surgery did not meet the needs of infection control and the patient. Pioneers, or should I say innovators like Myrna, transform what has been to what can be. Learn more about how Myrna has used her experience to help design scrub wear that promotes better infection control techniques.

Then there is the Joint Commission, working together with hos-pitals across the nation to define the barriers to wrong site sur-gery. It is one thing to hypothesize those patterns of behavior that promote poor outcomes. It is another to actually go out in the field and work with providers to identify those behaviors that

lead to mistakes. Read more about the Center for Transforming Healthcare and how collaboration leads to knowledge that helps us understand the triggers and how to correct them.

Finally, when we survey clinicians across the country, we find that the prevalence of needlestick injuries is staggering. But what is even more staggering is our acceptance that this is part of the job. Naomi Judd sheds some light on how a needlestick injury led to her diagnosis of Hepatitis C, her thoughts and how we can change our mind set of acceptance to intolerance.

We continue to learn. We continue to share. Our experiences give us reasons to dig deeper, learn more and change the status quo to a new level of care. Our goal is to EMPOWER healthcare workers by educating, identifying actionable steps or solutions to their challenges, and measuring outcomes. If you haven’t heard of the EMPOWER program…talk to your Medline repre-sentative. We are on a mission to help you transform your OR.

Thanks for sharing and being a part of our team.

Sue MacInnes, RDEditor

The OR Connection Letter from the Editor

Dear Reader,Here we are once again at Congress. So ... exciting. I think the biggest change that I’ve seen in healthcare over the last few years is transparency and openness. I know we have a long way to go, but I also know that never before have I sat at the table with physician leaders brainstorming on how they can participate in reducing waste, making surgery safer, interacting with patients…and so we are making progress. Let me remind you that progress comes in different stages. One size does not fit all ... think different strokes for different folks. Not a bad thing at all, just a progression. Hospitals are at different stages, but we are all working toward a common goal.

Page 6: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

6 The OR Connection

Contributing WritersKathleen Bartholomew, MN, RNPartners with Convergent HRS for training staff on how to improve their work relation-ships by building effective teams, focusing on communication and utilizing best prac-tice. http://convergenthrs.com/ She is a national speaker and author of four books on healthcare culture, communication and leadership. http://www.hcmarketplace.com/index.cfm?s=Healthcare20

Wolf Rinke, RD, CSPKeynote speaker, seminar leader, management consultant, executive coach and editor of the free electronic newsletter Read and Grow Rich, available at www.easyCPEcred-its.com. In addition he has authored numerous CDs, DVDs and books including Make It a Winning Life: Success Strategies for Life, Love and Business, Winning Manage-ment: 6 Fail-Safe Strategies for Building High-Performance Organizations. Reach him at [email protected].

William Rupp, MDBefore becoming CEO of Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Fla., Dr. Rupp served two terms as CEO within Mayo Health System — at Luther Midelfort in Eau Claire, Wisc., and at Immanuel St. Joseph’s in Mankato, Minn. In addition to his administrative responsibili-ties, Rupp is a former practicing medical oncologist. Mayo Health System is a family of clinics, hospitals and health care facilities serving 70 communities in Minnesota, Iowa and Wisconsin.

Naomi Judd, RNJudd found herself a single mother raising two little girls at a young age. She worked several jobs to support her family, including being a nurse, secretary, waitress and clerk, before she and her daughter Wynonna formed The Judds. The group went on to become country music’s most successful mother-daughter duo. Naomi took a long break from her career beginning in 1991 after a diagnosis of Hepatitis C from a needlestick during her nursing days.

Melody F. Dickerson, MSN, RNMelody Dickerson is a Center for Transforming Healthcare Project Leader and Master Black Belt in the Department of Robust Process Improvement at The Joint Commis-sion. In this role, she supports the Joint Commission’s activities associated with es-tablishing and sustaining a robust process improvement (RPI) culture.

Jayne Barkman, BSN, RN, CNORWith 29 years of perioperative experience in various roles, including surgical technolo-gist, staff nurse and clinical educator, Ms. Barkman currently works as a clinical nurse consultant.

Page 7: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 7

Motivation to fight harder

CANCER

Reasons to celebrate

1 U.S. Breast Cancer Statistics. BreastCancer.org website. Avail-able at: http://www.breastcancer.org/symp-toms/understand_bc/statistics.jsp. Accessed February 6, 2012.

.......................................

2 Breast Cancer Statis-tics. The Breast Cancer Society, Inc. website. Available at: http://www.breastcancersoci-ety.org/aboutbreastcan-cer/factsandstatistics/breastcancerstatistics/. Accessed February 6, 2012.

.......................................

3 What are the key statistics about breast cancer? American Cancer Society website. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/BreastCancer/DetailedGuide/breast-cancer-key-statistics. Accessed February 6, 2012.

Death rates from breast cancer have been decreasing since 1999 in women under 50.1

About 1in 8 U.S. women will develop invasive breast cancer in her lifetime.1

In 2012 about 226,870 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed in women3

39,510 women will die from breast cancer in 20123

In 2011, there were more than 2.6 million breast cancer survivors in the U.S.1

There is a 100% survival rate after treatment for those who are diagnosed and treated during the earliest stage of breast cancer. 2

fastfacts

1:8

BREAST

Breast Cancer AwarenessCampaign

Page 82

Page 8: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

What keeps you up at

night?

Medline is listening.

Value-Based Purchasing

Health Care Reform

Culture of SafetyAccountable Care

Waste Reduction

SCIP measures

Patient-Centered Care

Page 9: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

EMPOWER™

EDUCATION | ACTION | OUTCOMES

EMPOWER is a comprehensive methodology to help healthcare leaders transform their OR through

education, action, and outcomes.

Contact your local Medline Representative or call 1-800-Medline to learn how you can build a partnership that goes beyond innovative products and savings to ensure positive, sustainable outcomes tailored to your specific needs.

• Financial Programs• Outcomes Report• Business Reviews

EDUCATION

• Safety Survey• New Course Curriculum by Industry Leaders• Customized Medline University Web Page

Safety Solution Examples Include:• Surgical Site Infections• Retained Objects• Wrong Site Surgery • Needlesticks

ACTIONOUTCOMES

Page 10: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

10 The OR Connection

2012 Prevention Above All Discoveries Grant ProgramSupporting the adoption of solutions and interventions into everyday practice

In today’s healthcare environment, healthcare-acquired conditions, once considered a “side effect,” are no longer accepted. The government does not accept them, patients are not accepting them and the facilities themselves continually look for ways to build better systems to improve the quality of care. Knowing that clinicians in the field have some of the best ideas for improving care, Medline launched the Prevention Above All Discoveries Grant Program in 2008 as a way to help stimulate the gathering of solid evidence that supports the adoption of solutions into clinical practice. Through this innovative program, Medline has awarded more than $1.1 million in funding to front-line healthcare workers researching evidence-based solutions and interventions for the very conditions that CMS has declared as preventable.

Medline is accepting letters of intent from May 1 through June 30, 2012 for the 2012 Prevention Above All Discoveries Grant program and intends to award up to $1 million in grants for research on innovative ideas and evidence-based practices that will improve patient safety and quality of care. Healthcare providers interested in submitting letters of intent can apply for one of two funding categories: Pilot Grants of up to $25,000 for projects that can be completed within six months; or Empirical Study Grants of up to $100,000 for projects completed within 12 months.

How to apply for a grant More information about the grant program, as well as a sample letter of intent, can be found at www.medline.com/prevention-above-all/grants.asp. To submit a grant letter of intent, contact Toni Marchinski, grant coordinator, at [email protected] or call 866-941-1998.

“Historically, these research projects are great ideas that could significantly help in the fight against some of the toughest hospital-acquired conditions,” said Andrew

Kramer, MD, Head of the Department of Medicine’s Health Care Policy and Research Division at the University of Colorado and Grant Review Committee Chair.

“What’s unique about this funding is that it is all going to providers who are on the front lines of health care. The feedback this group gives us is critical to advancing healthcare technology.”

Page 11: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 11

2011 Prevention Above All Discoveries Grant Recipients

Title: CAUTI Prevention Program

Institution: Piedmont Healthcare Philanthropy, North Carolina

Principal Investigator: Monica Tennant & Dee Tucker

Title: Incidence of Falls Among Oncology Patients Who Are Cared for by Family Caregivers within Their Home.

Institution: Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes Jewish Hospital, Missouri

Principal Investigator: Patricia Potter, RN, PhD, FAAN; Marilee Kuhrik RN, PhD; Nancy Kuhrik RN, PhD, Sarah Olsen RN, BSN.

Title: Quick Room Turnaround Time (QRTAT) Ultraviolet Light Disinfection for Decreasing HAI

Institution: Ohio State University Hospital, Ohio

Principal Investigator: Christina Liscynesky, MD & Julie E. Mangino, MD

Title: Warfarin Safety Pilot Program

Institution: Foundation for Quality Care, New York

Principal Investigator: Nancy Merlino Leveille, RN, MS & Darren M. Triller, Pharm.D.

Title: Sensor Technology for Tracking and Displaying Bed Elevation Data for Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Institution: University of Iowa Hospital, Iowa

Principal Investigator: Alberto Maria Segre, Philip Polgreen, Geb Thomas, Ted Herman

Title: Testing Patient Education Handbooks

Institution: Good Samaritan Hospital, Pennsylvania

Principal Investigator: Patricia Donley, RN, MSN, Stephanie Andreozzi, Doctorate in Physical Therapy

Title: Using GRASP as Home Treatment for Upper Extremity (UE) Paresis Post-Stroke

Institution: Abbotsford Regional Hospital, Canada

Principal Investigator: May Chan, B.OT, Janice Eng, Ph.D. PT, OT, Shu-Hyun Jang, M.Sc.OT

Title:

A Standardized Process of Preoperative Body Cleansing with Comfort Bath® Cleansing Washcloths

Compared to Sage® 2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Cloths to Reduce Prosthetic Joint Infections at

Cambridge Hospital

Institution: Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical Center, Massachusetts

Principal Investigator: Lou Ann Bruno-Murtha, DO, Virginia Caples, RN, CIC and Diane Lancaster, RN, PhD

Title: Falls Risk Assessment Study

Institution: Provena St. Joseph Medical Center, Illinois

Principal Investigator: Jackie Medland RN, PhD

Title: The Effectiveness of Team Training on Fall Reduction

Institution: Wellstar Health System, Georgia

Principal Investigator: Bethany Robertson, LeeAnna Spiva & Marcia Delk, MD

Page 12: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

12 The OR Connection

Page 13: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 13

Developing and Launching

Medline launched its new PerforMAX scrub at the Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses’ 59th Annual Congress in New Orleans March 26. The scrub, which Medline says is the industry’s first-ever line of long-sleeved OR scrubs, was de-signed by Medline and Myrna Chang, DHA, RN, CNOR, direc-tor of perioperative services and sterile processing at O’Connor Hospital in San Jose, Calif. Dr. Chang and Jennifer Walrich, a senior product manager at Medline, whose team worked with Dr. Chang on the design of PerforMAX scrub, discuss why there is a need in the market for a long-sleeved scrub, how Dr. Chang became involved in its development and partnership with Medline, and what other clinical leaders can learn from her experience in working to bring an idea to reality.

Q: What challenges are presented by existing long-sleeve scrub jackets/scrub warm ups on the market that would necessitate development of an alternative?

Dr. Myrna Chang: Let me tell you what the operating room is like. It’s a sterile environment intended to reduce the risk of infecting the patient. The scrubbed personnel wear gowns and protective apparel to reduce the chance of infecting themselves and the patient. But it’s also cold in the OR so the gowns keep them warm.

AORN and OSHA guidelines advise non-scrubbed personnel to wear a long-sleeve warm-up jacket in the OR to prevent skin shedding because infection can result if the arms are not covered. It is well known that bacteria from the skin and hair falling out during prep time and while personnel navigate through the OR taking care of patients can increase the risk of infecting the patient.

The traditional long-sleeve warm-up jackets currently on the market are made to be loose fitting. The material hangs down from the arms and could potentially drag across the patient’s skin during the skin prep process, contaminating the surgical site and possibly putting the patient at-risk for infection after surgery. Another challenge is finding clothing that is comfortable and also looks good.

Q: What would you say is “special” about this scrub and why should organizations consider it for use? MC: These new scrubs have a snug-fitting long sleeve sewn directly into the short sleeves of the scrub top. The sleeves are made of a material similar to high-performance athletic apparel that fits snugly around the arms to provide comfort and breathability. Nurses in the OR have to perform for a long time during surgery, so they need material that will hold up over time and that is also comfortable. The sleeves on the PerforMAX scrubs are less likely to come into contact with the patient, which will prevent contamination of the sterile field. This complies with the AORN and OSHA guidelines while also keeping the nurses warm in the OR and providing a fashionable layered look-- something that we never had in the OR. Jennifer Walrich: Also, for the first time in the AORN standards and guidelines, [AORN] indicated all OR scrubs should be laundered at a HLAC-accredited commercial laundry, not taken home to be laundered. Because the scrubs have to be laundered in a commercial laundry, they need to be reversible. One of the major costs for a laundry is labor. So if a scrub comes inside out in the laundry, they’re not going to take the time to put it right-side out before they serve it back to their customer, so it has to be reversible.

by Rob Kurtz

Q&A with Myrna Chang of California’s

O’Connor Hospital and Jennifer Walrich

of Medline

a Long-Sleeved Scrub

Page 14: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

14 The OR Connection

Creating a reversible scrub top with an inset long sleeve was a challenge, and it took a great deal of design time and engineering time to figure out how to manufacture it. In addition to its unique tight-fitting sleeve that protects the patient and keeps the caregiver warm, just constructing it from a manufacturing point of view is pretty unique as well. Q: Dr. Chang, what was your involvement in development of the scrub top and how did you work with Medline on it? MC: Both Medline and I had the idea for long-sleeved scrubs independently. I came to Medline with some specific ideas from a user and clinician perspective. Medline and I collaborated extremely well on its design and performance, which is really great. It’s a practical partnership. To bring the clinical perspective and practical perspective to Medline is probably one of the best things I’ve ever done in my career. Medline is our longstanding vendor partner. I feel really fortunate that they’re forward-thinking and open to new ideas. When I introduced this idea, they were very open and excited to work with me. We exchanged ideas back and forth, tested a prototype, trialed the prototype and together we came up with the final product. It was a very gratifying experience. For someone who has never been involved in the clothing industry or developing a new product, they put me at ease and helped me understand products, textiles and things they do on their end. It was a very good learning experience.

JW: Myrna came to us with her idea [in June 2011] through our local sales rep. I had talked about a long-sleeve scrub shirt at a sales meeting with our sales reps in April. This particular rep kept that in the back of her mind, and when Myrna had a discussion with her about the idea, that’s what brought the two of us together. Q: Ms. Walrich, how often is Medline approached with ideas? JW: Actually quite frequently. Maybe more than you would expect. We get a lot of ideas from our customers, and we’re always more than willing to entertain them, and in this case, it was perfect timing. Q: How do you think you will feel when the PerforMAX scrub launches at the AORN Annual Congress? MC: More than ecstatic. I was really very proud that I came up with an idea that could help my fellow clinicians solve a problem. To see it come to life is an amazing experience. I can’t believe how easy and enjoyable it was to work with Jennifer

and the rest of her team. They shared the same vision I did on this scrub, and they’re just as excited as I am to share this with nurses everywhere. I never thought I could do something like this. JW: I’m very excited for Myrna, and very excited for Medline. Medline’s foundation is in textiles; we have a really strong history of innovation, especially in scrub apparel, and it’s just nice to be a part of that and create a product that will help our customers. Q: Dr. Chang, people have ideas for new products and solutions all the time but few actually have the opportunity to make their ideas a reality. What do you hope other nurses and clinical leaders learn from your efforts to help launch a scrub that aims to overcome challenges presented by existing products? MC: It’s usually difficult to get ideas off the ground because we clinicians are not sure who to take those ideas to. My message is if I can do it, anybody can. There are people and companies out there in business that are willing to work with clinicians, and Medline is one of those companies. I’m very lucky to partner with Medline. I would encourage people to always use creative thoughts when something is wrong. Don’t stop pursuing your ideas because even the simplest idea can turn into something big that would support clinicians in the OR, such as in this case, and provide patients with the highest quality and safest care. As more and more regulations change, and as more research is done, people will find that there are always things we need to do to improve the way we provide patient care. Nurses or whoever is working on the clinical side should not hesitate to bring forth ideas no matter how simple they are.

Reprinted with permission from Becker’s ASC Review.

Page 15: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Yes, They’re Genuine.

Only Medline’s Pink Pearl™ gloves combine aloe, nitrile and breast cancer awareness.

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. Medline is a registered trademark and Pink Pearl is a trademark of Medline Industries, Inc.

1

2

3

Download a QR Code Reader app

Launch the QR app

Scan this QR Code or visit http://pinkglovedance.com/

LEARN MORE ABOUT THE PINK GLOVE DANCE AND SUPPORT BREAST CANCER AWARENESS

Page 16: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

For protection from unintentional hypothermia in patients undergoing surgery, PerfecTemp is an excellent alternative to forced-air warming systems.

While other systems use disposable blankets to force warm air on top of patients, PerfecTemp’s unique surgical table pads offer:

• Efficient underbody warming is as effective as forced-air systems for preventing unintentional hypothermia.1

• More accurate patient monitoring

• Complete patient access

• Silent operation

• Reduced staff time

• No blowing air

• Energy conservation

PerfecTemp™

OR Patient Warming System

Innovation in Patient Warming

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. Medline and PerfecTemp are registered trademarks of Medline Industries, Inc.

Flexible and durable carbon heating element for uniform heating.

Underbody Warming for All Patients and Procedures

References1. Egan C, Bernstein E, Reddy D, et al. A randomized comparison of PerfecTemp and forced air warming during open abdominal surgery. Anesth. Analg. 2011; 113(5): 1076-1081.

Scan this QR Code or visit http://www.medline.com/product-literature/- surgicalsupplies/perfectemp-brochure.pdf

LEARN MORE ABOUT PERFECTEMP PATIENT WARMING SYSTEM

CE Article

Page 17: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 17

TARGETING:Wrong Site

Surgery Risks{ New Tool Hits the Bull’s-Eye}

Project Lead and Master Black Belt, Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare

By Melody F. Dickerson, MSN, RN

Hold the patient until the paperwork issues are resolved by the surgeon

Flag the chart and hope that it’s taken care of by the next team.

What should the nurse do?

The nurse has two options:

1

2

The geriatric patient is a woman with mild dementia, but she is alert and ori-ented to person, place, and time. No immediate family is present. The nurse’s job is to first have the patient sign the consent, and then to sign the consent as the witness. The patient says she is having her right knee replaced but points to her left leg. This organization prides itself on its 99 percent on-time case start rate and this surgeon in particular hates to run late. The nurse has tried to page the surgeon, but she is in the OR finishing another case and will not have time to come to pre-op before her next case, which is this one. The pre-op charge nurse says that the OR team is coming to

take the patient to the OR.

Patient: Geriatric woman

with mild dementia

OR Schedule States:Total (left) knee replacement

But, the history and physical says that the patient is having

the procedure performed on the (right) leg

Surgeon Consent Form:Signed by the surgeon reads

that the procedure is to be performed on the (right) leg

Patient feedback: The patient says she is having

her right knee replaced but points to her left leg.

{ Pre-OP Holding Area Scenario }

CE Article

Page 18: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

18 The OR Connection

This is a scenario that no one wants to be in – not the nurse, not the surgeon and certainly not the patient. It’s evident that things started to go wrong long before the

patient showed up in the pre-op area. Ideally, we would want to find out exactly when and where the problems first occurred and have solutions that are targeted to address or eliminate them. That’s exactly what the Joint Commission’s Center for Transforming Healthcare’s Targeted Solutions Tool™ (TST) does – and it’s working today to reduce risks for wrong site surgery in Joint Commission accredited hospitals and ambula-tory surgical centers.

Wrong site, side, procedure or person surgery is a rare event, but it is still too common. It is estimated that wrong site surgery occurs approximately 40 times per week in the United States and it is the most common sentinel event reported to The Joint Commission. These errors can result in devastating injury to patients and families, damage the reputation of the organiza-tion, and have a significant emotional impact on the staff who participated in the case. In addition, cases that have gone to trial have resulted in multi-million dollar judgments against the facility and the staff who participated.

The causes for wrong site surgery vary but, as in our scenario, most occur due to multiple errors that reach the patient. It is common for these errors to cross through the departments of surgical booking, pre-op/holding and the OR. The Joint

Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare worked with a group of leading hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers to identify the risks of wrong site surgery and to develop so-lutions targeted to impact these risks. Wrong site surgery is a devastating event, but with the right tools, effective change management, and a multidisciplinary team approach, it can be prevented.

Project Background In 1999, the Institute of Medicine published To Err is Human: Building a Better Health System (http://www.nap.edu/cata-log/9728.html) which states: “In health care, building a safer system means designing processes of care to ensure that patients are safe from accidental injury. When agreement has been reached to pursue a course of medical treatment, pa-tients should have the assurance that it will proceed correctly and safely so they have the best chance possible of achieving the desired outcome.” Before that, The Joint Commission and its Sentinel Event program first identified wrong site surgery as a common type of sentinel event in 1996. The Joint Com-mission has also issued two Sentinel Event Alert newsletters on wrong site surgery—the first published in 1998 and the follow-up in 2001. In 2003, The Joint Commission held its first Wrong Site Surgery Summit, and in 2004, it launched the

Page 19: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 19

Universal Protocol for Preventing Wrong Site, Wrong Procedure, and Wrong Person Surgery™ as a National Patient Safety Goal. In 2009, the Joint Commission Center for Transforming Health-care began work with a group of eight hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers using the tools of Robust Process Improve-ment™ (RPI) to focus on measuring baseline performance and generating strategies to reduce the risk of wrong site surgery.

The Center for Transforming Healthcare was launched in 2009 by The Joint Commission with the sole purpose of using the systematic approach of RPI to analyze specific breakdowns in care, discover their underlying causes, and develop solutions that are targeted to the causes of these complex problems. RPI incorporates tools and concepts from Lean Six Sigma and change management methodologies. In keeping with its objec-tive to transform health care into a high reliability industry, the Joint Commission shares these proven solutions with the more

than 19,000 organizations it accredits and certifies. The focus of this work is on improving the systems and processes used to drive care.

The original eight hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers helped to develop a measurement system designed to capture the risks in the surgical processes that could lead to a wrong site surgery in the areas of surgical booking, pre-op/holding and the OR. It is impractical to measure wrong site surgery events since they occur so rarely; instead, the project focused on iden-tifying the risks that could lead to a wrong site, wrong procedure or wrong person surgery. The measurement system involves direct observation and monitoring by trained staff. The follow-ing charts show examples of risks for wrong site surgery from each area and a breakdown of how these risks were distributed among the eight participating organizations:

Page 20: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

20 The OR Connection

These examples represent how the RPI approach differs from other tools, bundles and checklists currently available to healthcare orga-nizations to help tackle this issue. It’s interesting to note that the risks identified by organization A varied from those identified by or-ganization H. So, for example, if organization A developed a check-list around their risks and processes, it would have worked well. But if organization H implemented the same checklist, it wouldn’t prove to be as successful for them. The key to successfully imple-menting effective solutions is that they must address the risks that are specific to the organization. For instance, a checklist for orga-nization A may not evaluate the use of the appropriate site marking pen or the use of stickers to mark the site, while organization H struggles with these elements. Through the use of RPI methods, an organization measures its baseline performance to determine which risk factors are most prevalent. The data generated is then analyzed to determine the most common causes of failure or in-consistencies. Many of the organizations involved in the original Wrong Site Surgery project and the piloting uncovered risks they didn’t know they had. For instance, one organization found they were using seven different types of site marks, ranging from an “x,” surgeon’s initials, and a dot. Once risks like this are identified, the organization can develop solutions targeted to impact their specific risks, test the solutions to determine their effectiveness, and then continue to monitor them to ensure that success is sustained.

Results

How successful has this approach been?

The results of these pilots were impressive, with a reduction of risks identified in all three areas in the surgical processes leading up to the incision.

• Surgical booking experienced a 46 percent

reduction in cases containing risks and a 57 percent decrease in cases containing more than one risk

• Pre-op/holding experienced a 63 percent

reduction in cases containing risks and a 72 percent reduction of cases containing more than one risk

• OR experienced a 51 percent reduction in cases containing risks and a 76 persent reduction of cases containing more than one risk

Page 21: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 21

Results

How successful has this approach been?

The results of these pilots were impressive, with a reduction of risks identified in all three areas in the surgical processes leading up to the incision.

• Surgical booking experienced a 46 percent

reduction in cases containing risks and a 57 percent decrease in cases containing more than one risk

• Pre-op/holding experienced a 63 percent

reduction in cases containing risks and a 72 percent reduction of cases containing more than one risk

• OR experienced a 51 percent reduction in cases containing risks and a 76 persent reduction of cases containing more than one risk

Surgical Booking The preparation of the OR schedule can occur weeks in advance of the surgery and it can be difficult to fathom that an error occurring this far from the time the patient actually shows up in the operating room isn’t caught before harming the patient. In 2009, the Penn-sylvania Patient Safety Authority (http://patientsafetyauthority.org/ADVISORIES/AdvisoryLibrary/2009/Sep6(3)/documents/104.pdf ) identified incorrect OR schedules as a contributing factor to wrong site surgery. Most OR staff use the OR schedule as the roadmap for room set up; this set up creates a powerful visual cue to the entire team as to the laterality of the case and the procedure being performed. The audit tools developed to measure this part of the surgical process specifically evaluate the receipt of forms to the organization performing the surgery and the booking form itself.

For the receipt of forms, the top three areas of weakness identified by the project teams were: verbal ordering of procedures without written documentation; multiple booking forms received for the same surgical case; and cases scheduled within 48 hours of the surgery date. While the findings weren’t surprising to the individu-als who usually prepared the surgical schedule, it was surprising to the OR leadership, particularly the frequency of verbal scheduling without the support of written communication.

While errors on the booking form varied as well, the most common errors related to the use of unapproved abbreviations, particularly

when used to identify laterality of the surgical site. For ambulatory surgical centers, conflicts between the procedural coding and writ-ten description of the procedure were frequently identified as risks and required follow up with the ordering physician’s office. The solutions for these also varied, but all involved engaging the phy-sician’s office staff. Some solutions included sharing information needed to make the surgical booking process as easy as possible for the office staff. Other identified solutions included the develop-ment of a resource manual containing: a list of unapproved ab-breviations; hard copies of the ordering form and the order change form; frequently used telephone and fax numbers; and frequently asked questions.

Most facilities began a series of lunch meetings with the offices that frequently book surgical cases. The purpose of these meet-ings was to engage these practices in collaborative conversations about improving the process for both parties and, most importantly, ensuring that cases are booked accurately. Other solutions, while seemingly simple, required a significant commitment by the orga-nization performing the surgery. These solutions included imple-menting a single booking fax line where all documents pertaining to surgical cases could be faxed; or implementing electronic schedul-ing, even for practices that are not directly affiliated with their facility. The result of these solutions and others resulted in a 46 percent reduction in defective cases in surgical booking.

The following sections illustrate some specific examples of how the solutions have been implemented in the areas of surgical booking, pre-op/holding and OR.

Page 22: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

22 The OR Connection

Despite best efforts, wrong site surgeries occur.

We’d like for that not to happento your patients, your staff andyour organization.

For more information and for the opportunity for a guided tour of the tool for your organization, contact [email protected].

Organizations that are accredited by The Joint Commission havefree access to the Targeted Solutions Tool™ (TST) that can helpthem discover practical and field tested ways to eliminate thecauses of wrong site surgeries. The TST provides an interactiveweb-based process that helps organizations identify, measure anddecrease risks in key surgical processes.

By utilizing the TST, organizations can evaluate risk in• Scheduling• Pre-operative care• Operating room area

The TST, which was developed by the Joint Commission Centerfor Transforming Healthcare, is the platform for several key healthcare initiatives. To help address the wrong site surgery challenge,the Center collaborated with several hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers to develop the solutions by utilizing concepts andmethods from Lean Six Sigma and other change managementtools.

The results so far………..

TARGETED SOLUTIONS TOOL™

Area Reduced Risk

Scheduling area 46%

Pre-op 63%

OR 51%

TST medline Ad 2-28_Layout 1 2/29/12 8:54 AM Page 1

Pre-op/HoldingIn the pre-op/holding areas, paperwork issues continue to be a problem, with documents critical to the patient verification pro-cess (e.g., signed surgical consent, history and physical, and op-erating room schedule) being incorrect, incomplete or missing. Exacerbating this issue is the metric on which many hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers pride themselves -- on-time OR case start rates. Many staff said that they felt rushed to get the patient ready for surgery because they were searching for or coordinating last minute revisions to primary documents. It was also common for staff to be uncomfortable stopping the patient flow to the OR due to paperwork concerns. Staff stated they would flag the documents in question, relying on the next caregiver to make corrections. Other risks identified included the identification of inadequacies in the patient verification process.

For instance, it was common to find the surgeon not using a second patient identifier or referencing the procedure site and side using one of the primary documents (e.g., history and physi-cal or signed surgical consent). When asked why, many stated that they felt the patient might be offended if asked for a second patient identifier, or they assumed that another team member was verifying the procedure site and side using the primary docu-ments.

The solutions to these problems were not simple; they involved strong leadership support to making change and holding staff accountable. The solutions required that the primary docu-ments, specifically the history and physical and the signed sur-gical consent, be available the day before surgery. If the case was scheduled as a first case, it would be bumped to a later time so that the paperwork could be pulled and the patient in-formation properly verified on the day of surgery. This solution required that the organization performing the surgery have a well established surgical booking process, and a mechanism for veri-fying the presence of the primary documents and for reporting any missing documentation back to the ordering practice within the 48 hours preceding the surgery date. Another key in chang-ing behaviors of the surgical team was the use of “just in time” coaching – coaches who actively intervene when they observe noncompliance in order to understand an organization’s contrib-uting factors, and to coach healthcare workers on proper com-

pliance. These coaches helped address concerns about patient verification and patient perceptions. As a result, a new practice is to inform patients upon arrival on the day of surgery that they will be asked by all team members to recite their name, second patient identifier, procedure, site and side.

In addition to paperwork concerns, many of the pilot organiza-tions also audited regional blocks performed by anesthesia in the pre-op areas. The group found many regional blocks were being performed without a formal timeout process or without a site mark specific to the block. These omissions were identified as risks for wrong side or site surgeries in 2009 by the Pennsyl-vania Patient Safety Authority. The solutions involve engaging anesthesia providers to design a time out process which includes a nurse in the pre-op area. The time out process ensures appro-priate patient verification involving the alert patient to ensure the correct procedure, patient and laterality. In addition, the patient is engaged in a formal site marking process. The site mark consists of an unambiguous mark that is specific to anesthesia, such as the physician’s initials with an A with a circle around it ( A ) to dif-ferentiate the mark from the surgeon’s mark.

The impact of the solutions implemented in the pre-op/hold-ing areas resulted in a 63 percent reduction in the rate of cases containing risks and a 72 percent reduction of cases containing more than one risk.

Operating RoomIn the operating room, all of the participating organizations found that team attention during the time out process was lacking. It was not uncommon to find staff continuing to work and set up the OR suite while the time out was being performed. There were many causes for this inattention, including the timing of the time out itself. It was discovered that if the time out is performed before the patient is prepped, staff will continue to set up the room and find it difficult to stop what they are doing and to par-ticipate in the time out. In 2009, the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority identified time out processes that were performed be-fore the patient was prepped and draped as a risk for wrong side or site surgery. In addition, staff inattention was found to be more of a problem if the entire team did not participate fully in the time out process. It was common to find a single circulating nurse

Continued in Page 24

Page 23: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Despite best efforts, wrong site surgeries occur.

We’d like for that not to happento your patients, your staff andyour organization.

For more information and for the opportunity for a guided tour of the tool for your organization, contact [email protected].

Organizations that are accredited by The Joint Commission havefree access to the Targeted Solutions Tool™ (TST) that can helpthem discover practical and field tested ways to eliminate thecauses of wrong site surgeries. The TST provides an interactiveweb-based process that helps organizations identify, measure anddecrease risks in key surgical processes.

By utilizing the TST, organizations can evaluate risk in• Scheduling• Pre-operative care• Operating room area

The TST, which was developed by the Joint Commission Centerfor Transforming Healthcare, is the platform for several key healthcare initiatives. To help address the wrong site surgery challenge,the Center collaborated with several hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers to develop the solutions by utilizing concepts andmethods from Lean Six Sigma and other change managementtools.

The results so far………..

TARGETED SOLUTIONS TOOL™

Area Reduced Risk

Scheduling area 46%

Pre-op 63%

OR 51%

TST medline Ad 2-28_Layout 1 2/29/12 8:54 AM Page 1

Page 24: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

24 The OR Connection

responsible for reciting the key elements from the signed surgical consent while all the other team members participated passively. The solution is to create a role-based time out process where ev-ery team member not only has the opportunity to participate, but is expected to participate. The data collected during the baseline period will help the organization identify which role is best suited to initiate the time out.

The TST provides scripts that outline a time out process that can be tailored to the organization. For instance, one organization’s time out process includes the Universal Protocol and may com-bine multiple elements, such as blood products, implants or ra-diographic images. Another organization may choose to pull out these elements and perform them during a briefing process that occurs before the prep and drape. This briefing process would include the Universal Protocol and be completely separate from -- but in addition to -- the time out, and it would occur after the prep and drape. Either approach is acceptable. The key to success is staff buy-in to the process and the sense that the multidisciplinary team is responsible for keeping patients safe, rather than the surgeon alone. The results of these solutions and others resulted in a 51 percent reduction in the rate of cases in the operating room containing risks and a 76 percent reduction of cases containing more than one risk.

Change ManagementA key factor to the success of any process improvement project -- particularly one that requires such a diverse group of individu-als as those found in most surgical services -- is active engage-ment of key stakeholders and the use of change management strategies. One of the first exercises that the Center’s project teams are asked to engage in is an evaluation of the stakehold-ers in the process. For the Wrong Site Surgery project, anyone directly affected by any changes made to the processes that lead up to the surgical incision should be engaged in the project.

Stakeholders can be groups or individuals; the goal is to deter-mine early on if the project has the support needed for success. If not, strategies need to be developed early in the process to help bridge the gap between where the group or individual is in

A key factor to the success of any process improvement project....

Is active engagement of key stakeholders and the use of change

management strategies.

supporting the effort and where they need to be. For example, the project may lack the support of anesthesiologists because they are wary of any project that might impact the way that they perform the time out for regional blocks. The project team may decide that the best way to engage this group is to ask the section head to attend team meetings and work with the team to refine processes, particularly those that directly impact anesthesiologists.

Organizations are encouraged to weave change management strategies throughout the improvement process to optimize success -- even after the project has been completed and so-lutions have been successfully implemented. It is important to continue to give staff feedback on their performance, validating that the hard work they have done to make change was worth the effort and to ensure that improvements are sustained. A great way to provide this feedback is to continue with the audit-ing process, sharing data during staff meetings, posting results in an area frequented by staff, and celebrating improvement and sustainment. The pilot organizations have found that this data can be easily captured with just one audit being performed per day in each area.

How the Solutions are SpreadThe Center for Transforming Healthcare has taken the informa-tion learned through the original participating organizations and the pilot organizations and made them available via the Tar-geted Solutions Tool™ (TST) for Wrong Site Surgery. The TST for Wrong Site Surgery is explicitly designed for hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers with the goal of spreading these results throughout the country. The TST is now available free of charge to Joint Commission accredited and certified programs. The TST is a self paced, web-based application that provides a six-step process that guides an organization through the fol-lowing steps:

• stakeholder analysis • identification and training of data collectors • data collection and entry • automated data analysis, provided in a

presentation ready format • solutions targeted to the organization’s data results • plans and tools for sustaining improvements

For more information about the Wrong Site Surgery project or the Targeted Solutions Tool for Wrong Site Surgery, visit the Center for Transforming Healthcare website at http://www.cen-terfortransforminghealthcare.org/multimedia/tst_wss/ or email [email protected].

Page 25: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 25

8. Regarding surgical booking, which of the following was one of the top three areas of weakness identified by the project teams?

a. Cases scheduled within 48 hours of the surgery date

b. Incorrect documentation of patient medications

c. No patient insurance information on file

d. None of the above

9. Which of the following “Validated Root Causes for Risk of Wrong Site Surgery” were experienced by all eight pilot hospitals?

a. Unapproved abbreviations, cross-outs, and illegible handwriting used on the booking form

b. Time Out performed without full participation

c. Both a and b

d. All of the above

10. What did all of the participating organizations observe regarding the time out process in the OR?

a. Surgical teams often forgot to perform a time out

b. Surgical teams were too rushed to perform a time out

c. Team attention was lacking during the time out

d. None of the above

True/False

1. A retained foreign object after surgery is a common sentinel event reported to The Joint Commission. T F

2. The key to successfully implementing effective solutions is that they must address the risks that are specific to the organization. T F

3. In 2009, the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority identified incorrect OR schedules as a contributing factor to wrong site surgery. T F

4. Implementing electronic scheduling was found to be one solution for avoiding errors in surgical booking. T F

5. Organizations are encouraged to weave change management strategies throughout the improvement process to optimize success. T F

Multiple Choice

6. The Joint Commission first identified wrong site surgery as a common type of sentinel event in:

a. 1989

b. 1996

c. 2002

d. 2007

7. Which three areas does The Joint Commission’s wrong site surgery measurement system encompass?

a. Surgical booking, pre-op/holding, the OR

b. Pre-op/holding, the OR, post-op/recovery

c. Surgical booking, surgical time out, post-op/recovery

d. None of the above

Targeting Wrong Site Surgery Risks: New Tool Hits the Bull’s-Eye

CE TEST

Course is approved for continuing education by the Florida Board of Nursing and the California Board of Registered Nursing. Visit www.medlineuniversity.com and login or create an account. Choose your course to take the test and receive 1 FREE CE credit.

Page 26: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

26 The OR Connection

YOU HAVE NOW CROSSED OVER INTO ...

By Kathleen Bartholomew, RN, MN

TheGrayZone

You are part of a team doing a tracheal resection when one surgeon drops out and performs a bronchoscope exam, contaminating the sterile field. He doesn’t want to bother with re-draping because “the unsterile endotracheal tube and breathing circuit will be attached rendering the entire set-up clean anyway.” It’s not the first time a surgeon you have worked with has switched from sterile to aseptic technique unexpectedly during an operation. And after all, his request is logical. But still, the whole experience is unsettling. Your job is to keep the field sterile, and years of training and expertise and vigilance feel suddenly challenged. Is it mind vs. emo-tions ... personal vs. professional?

So you say something, and before long you are perceived as a “troublemaker.” Other little events occur, and an internal dilemma builds. You insisted just last week that the sponge and needle count be performed at change of shift per policy,

and the circulator rolled her eyes. To speak up, or remain silent? Welcome to “The Gray Zone.”

“The Gray Zone” is the psychological “no-man’s” land be-tween black and white. It’s those moments when we ques-tion ourselves and what is truly the right thing to do. They are all those situations that weren’t covered by your teachers in school …or are not in the policy book … or are not ad-dressed effectively by management. Hospitals today are filled with Gray Zones, which have become an integral part of the healthcare culture. This is one of the major reasons that 22 patients die an hour from preventable errors. Not so in other industries …

Nuclear power operators, submarine, high-rise construction and aviation are all high-risk professions that have learned from experience that you don’t ever deviate from the plan

Page 27: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 27

or standard procedures during critical phases. Ambigu-ity undermines self-esteem, decreases morale, and creates an unjustified level of risk. Indeed, procedures are primarily for the purpose of guiding humans through these adrenal-charged times when our amygdala (the structure within the brain that appears to be at the very center of most events associated with fear) is hijacked because they have discov-ered—after many deaths— that human beings can’t think straight when they are upset. Furthermore, when you intro-duce a little deviation … then over time you permit a little more … and a little more.

I was called to an operating room where the anesthesiolo-gist accidentally drew up 10cc’s of epinephrine instead of the intended toradol. The patient coded and was revived after some difficulty. The anesthesiologist did not catch

For every quarter of TEAM training, the mortality rate decreased 0.5 per 1000 procedure deaths

Continued in Page 29

Page 28: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

When Medline builds your custom cath lab kits, we help you to design a kit that best fits your practice. With our new line of fluid management items for the cath lab, you get high quality components that offer true economy delivered with unbeatable service levels.

Start building your ne w cath lab pack today.Ask your Medline rep for our latest cath lab components catalog or request one at 1-800-MEDLINE.

Custom Kits for Your Cardiac Cath Lab

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. Medline is a registered trademark of Medline Industries, Inc.

Page 29: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

the error himself and it was discovered that he was on his cell phone talking to his stock broker while administering the medi-cine to an 18-year-old knee surgery patient. It was no surprise to discover that everyone in the room had a cell phone in their pocket. No doubt this started when a member of the team was worried about a sick child, or waiting to hear if they sold their house. That’s how allowing a phone into the room over several years in this particular O.R. became “normalized” – just like the Challenger explosion – or allowing minor deviations from sterile technique. In sociology it’s called “creeping normalcy,” because when something creeps slow enough over a long period of time, no one can see it advancing. Over time, we get sloppy without realizing it.

I haven’t met anyone yet who doesn’t want to do the right thing. But people’s ideas of what is “right” sometimes conflict. Is it ok to switch from sterile to aseptic technique during an operation? Only if this switch was planned before the operation began. The time to discuss a change– any change– is never in the middle of a procedure.

Collegial teams don’t disagree (even overtly) during an operation. If you need to discuss something pertinent to the procedure, then wait until the surgery is over. In aviation it’s called the “sterile cockpit.” Only conversation about the task at hand is permitted below 10,000 feet because that is a critical phase of flight. In the last U.S. airplane crash they broke this rule. The conver-sation distracted them, they lost control of the plane in Buffalo and everyone died. (Same principle as “don’t text and drive.”) The acceptable methodology in handling a disagreement below 10,000 feet is to say, “We’ll talk about this on the ground.” If the patient is in the operating room, then you are below 10,000 feet.

From the moment the patient enters the operating room to the time he or she leaves is always a critical phase – but much more stressful. Humans under stress frequently say or send off signals that are unintentional, yet harm or distract the team. Research shows that simply witnessing rude behavior significantly impairs our ability to perform cognitive tasks. In other words, it’s not ok for anyone to ever upset someone else – even unintentionally— by sending off negative vibes or suddenly altering the procedure.

It’s like changing the rules of the game in the fourth quarter. Great O.R. teams call these covert and overt behaviors out – after the operation during the debrief.

A debrief is absolutely critical and can be done while changing out the room. What worked well? What needs improvement? Did the operation go exactly as planned? Were all procedures followed? If not, what can we resolve now – and what needs to be tabled for later? Great teams are always looking for an opportunity to do better.

Sounds clear enough – but that’s not reality in many operating rooms today. What if the surgeon is getting upset and over-rides the “we’ll discuss this later” script? The welfare of the patient is always paramount. There may be times when you need to ac-quiesce simply to calm the surgeon and create peace. Then, it is absolutely incumbent on the entire team to debrief – or agree on a time to debrief later if emotions are still high – or to not participate in the same operation again until the issue has been resolved to the team’s satisfaction.

Teams that debrief have made tremendous strides toward changing the culture of the operating room, which has been tra-ditionally a hierarchy. Historically, debriefing has not been easy because it is perceived as a threat to the surgeon’s autonomy and power — as evidenced by our everyday casual conversations.

The surgeon walks rapidly down the hall saying, “Where’s my patient?” In the next room the scrub is instructing a new nurse: “Some people say the handles of the fluid pitchers need to be inside the warmer basin. I like mine hanging over the edge.”

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 29

For every increase in degree of briefing and debriefing mortality rate was reduced by 0.6 per 1000 procedures

TheGrayZone

Page 30: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

30 The OR Connection

The use of the words “my,” “mine” and “I” are frequently heard throughout today’s operating rooms; and no one thinks much of them. But they are a clear indication of the old hierarchical culture. Great teams don’t use possessive pronouns. In a col-legial interactive team, people would say “our” patient and this is the way “we” do it. Preference cards would be virtually non-existent, as surgeons would have used evidence-based practice to uniformly agree on the tools and techniques for each particular surgery. There would be no need for multiple preference cards – just one card per surgery.

I’ll admit this is not the realty of most operating rooms. It’s not even the way they do it on television. So how do you get there? How do you change from a traditionally hierarchical culture to a collegial team? By your words – by speaking up. Words change a culture. Silence is unfortunately the norm, however, because the first person to unveil the gray zone…or request a debrief … or say “We’ll plan the switch to aseptic next time”… or “Don’t use your cell phone” puts himself in an extremely vulnerable position by behaving differently than the group.

Protect them. Watch out for these people because they are truly courageous leaders. Follow them. Know that your voice is more powerful than you ever imagined. Join them, and eliminate the Gray Zone. Patient safety and adherence to best practice is black or white. We either do what we know will keep our patients safe – or we don’t.

Reference: “Association Between Medical Team Training and Patient Mortality” Julia Neily; Peter D. Mills; Yinong Young-Xu; et al. JAMA 2010;304. Available at: http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/304/15/1693.full. Accessed February 7, 2012.

Page 31: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

The performance features surgeons demandInner Gel Coating made from hydrophilic synthetic polymer, allows hands to glide effortlessly into the glove – wet or dry.

Translucent Color provides contrast when double gloving according to AORN recommendations.

Glide Finish exterior provides exceptional control and tactile sensitivity.

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. Medline is a registered trademark of Medline Industries, Inc. Signature Glide is a trademark of Medline Industries, Inc.

High Performance with the Right Fit and Feel

Signature Glide™

SurgicalGloves

Powder-Free

Latex

Page 32: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

MAYO CLINIC

32 The OR Connection

Communication and TeamworkSet Them Apart

Page 33: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

MAYO CLINIC

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 33

Sue MacInnes recently had the opportunity to meet with Dr. Bill Rupp, CEO of the Mayo

Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida. Here is some of the conversation that resulted from that

meeting as they discussed the culture of safety at Mayo … followed by a guided tour

of the hospital to see and feel communication and teamwork in action …

Page 34: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

34 The OR Connection

SM: And you end up blaming yourself.Dr. Rupp: Yes. You blame yourself. The other thing that is a real challenge in our culture is communication. If you don’t communi-cate against the gradient a patient might die. And then you have high gradience in healthcare with doctors, nurses and others up and down the line. So, even in organizations as wonderful as Mayo, where our strength is that we are physician led, and our potential Achilles heel is that we are physician led. So challeng-ing against the gradient is a real issue. We are working hard to teach people to do that by getting them more comfortable with sharing information. It is a multi-year journey to get a culture to be that way.

SM: Do you think that Mayo is different because you are physician led?Dr. Rupp: I think we are different because we are all on the same team. We don’t have physician groups working for their own economic incentives that could potentially hurt the organization. One of the challenges in healthcare systems in the U.S. is when physicians are competing against hospitals. And the hospital that the physician works for is often the physician’s greatest competi-tor. So, they are not on the same team. I hope that healthcare reform brings us all together collaboratively, so that we’re all on one team.

SM: Where are the biggest Mayo sites and how does your facility fit into the rest of the Mayo system? Dr. Rupp: The three big sites are Rochester, Minn., Arizona and Florida. We are called three-shield academic centers: research, education and practice—with practice being our most important component. And we have a fair amount of basic scientific research on this campus and the other two campuses. We all have residents in education programs. Our push over the last couple of years has been to be one Mayo Clinic. We want to be standardized across our organization, so that if you come to Florida with a TIA, you’re going to get the exact same treatment and work-up as you would in Rochester or Arizona. We already do it in a number of areas. If you need a kidney or liver transplant, you get an identical work-up at all three sites. We have the same kind of surgery, and we have the same kind of post-op follow up in all three. In fact, we’re working on getting people listed to work at all three sites.

SM: Do the three sites ever get together?Dr. Rupp: Yes. We have what we call “councils,” where our trans-plant people from each site get together and standardize things.

Sue MacInnes: Dr. Rupp, is there anything you’d like to say to The OR Connection readers?Dr. Rupp: Let me start with a couple thoughts…

Healthcare professionals have historically been taught to work hard and study hard. And the culture is if you work hard enough and study hard enough you won’t make a mistake. But it doesn’t always happen that way.

I don’t know anyone who comes to work in the morning and says, “I think I’m going to screw up today and hurt somebody.” But it happens, because we are human beings and we have systems that are incredibly complex. We’ve created a culture of “work hard study hard” so that the conclusion is if you do make a mistake, you obviously didn’t work hard enough.

Page 35: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 35

SM: But it must be hard. Don’t you have different cultures in each of the sites? Dr. Rupp: Yes, it’s very hard. But fundamentally it’s still a Mayo culture. So we’re very similar to start with. We go to great lengths to share information and procedures.

SM: How do we engage more healthcare facilities to get “top-down” leadership to be more transparent, especially understanding that many people might choose not to do that because it exposes too much?Dr. Rupp: First, when we are transparent, it makes the staff believe in us more because they know we’re not hiding stuff. Second, by the very process, we all admit that we are human and most of the time when we have mistakes; it’s the system that’s the problem. There is growing evidence that transparency leads to fewer losses – not more. The other thing that you will see with our quality boards is that we are transparent by mak-ing the boards available to patients and families, as well as staff. When numbers are not going right, the staff is all over it because everybody sees it.

SM: When did you start putting these numbers out? Dr. Rupp: Ten to 15 years ago. The idea came out of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement – like posting in ICU the number of days since the last ventilator problem.

SM: How long does it take for before the staff becomes OK with the transparency? Dr. Rupp: It takes a little time. In one of our major meeting rooms here we have quality boards on the wall with data on infection, financials and service. We put it up on a big poster board be-cause that room is the most common meeting room in the facility and everybody that goes in there says, “Oh, so that’s what they are watching.” We had visitors from other parts of the system who were initially shocked that we had that data so “publicly” displayed, and yet now it appears that other places are doing it as well.

SM: Were you the first place to put up these boards? Dr. Rupp: We were certainly one of the early places.

SM: Do numbers make you feel uncomfortable?Dr. Rupp: Yes and no. They just are. They increase the quality of the data and can increase the quality of care. In 2008 we said let’s get rid of ventilator-associated pneumonia. And typical of a very good medical center, I was told that we probably couldn’t do that because we have some sick patients. Well, in 2008 we had 14 cases, in 2009 we had seven, and in 2010 we had three. Last year we had one. So, we’ll get there. In 2008 we had 36 central line infections, in 2009 we had 18, in 2010 we had 10, last year we had six. So, by just putting the numbers out there we are af-fecting the quality of care.

Page 36: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

SM: I bet you are proud of that. Dr. Rupp: Yes, I’m very proud of our staff, and yet our goal is to get our rates to zero.

SM: So, you care about the number of individual incidents?Dr. Rupp: The number of individual patients is important. If we have the lowest infection rate in the world and I am that one patient...

SM: I agree. Percentages are meaningless because the percentage could still mean a significant number of people. Dr. Rupp: More than that. When you’re talking real numbers, you’re talking real people. At my previous position I shared patient names with board members. It showed that the numbers are people. And suddenly to the lay board members it became real – because they knew “Mary Smith” or “Paul Johnson.”

SM: Can you tell me a little about the patient/doctor relationship at Mayo?Dr. Rupp: One of our ENT surgeons was in the operating room working on a patient with a basal skull lesion and he was getting near the end of the surgery when he got a call from the ICU. They told him a patient he had operated on two days before was bleeding. They asked him to come and look at it. And it became obvious very quickly that the patient was going to have to go back to the OR right away. So, the ENT surgeon called one of

the plastic surgeons in a very busy clinic and asked, “Can you get down here and finish this case for me, because I have to take care of another patient.” The plastic surgeon came down and finished the case while the ENT surgeon fixed the bleed on the other patient. When the ENT surgeon was done with the bleed-ing patient, he came back and kept the surgery line going. Rarely would a surgeon walk in on a patient that he has never seen before, like the plastic surgeon did, and finish the case. Mayo’s focus is on meeting the needs of the patient.

SM: It all stems from the belief that the patient is number one. You have to do everything for the patient. Dr. Rupp: Another thing you’ll notice here is that our patient areas are very nice. Our administrative and doctor areas are also nice, but not like the patient area. We put the dollars into the patient area.

SM: Tell me about the OR. Dr. Rupp: We had a challenge. We had a system that allowed us to do any case at any time, and it made life very unpredictable for our OR nurses. They might come in one day and get sent home early because there weren’t that many cases. And then the next day they would come in and be here until 10 or 11 pm. It is incredibly disruptive for somebody trying to run a family, pick up kids, etc. So, we changed to a system that is much more orderly with scheduling up to 24 hours in advance. We have rooms that run from 7 am till 5 pm, and we guarantee that those rooms will

36 The OR Connection

Continued in Page 39

Page 37: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Join 207,000 other nurses for FREE CE courses at

Medline University

w200 coursesw20 curriculum trackswInteractive competencieswFlexible access: PC, iPhone, iPadwFree registration

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. Medline and Medline University are registered trademarks of Medline Industries, Inc.

www.medlineuniversity.com

Page 38: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Promote Correct-Site Surgery Our Surgical Time Out Procedure (S.T.O.P.™) safety products alert the surgical team to perform a time-out verification and help reduce the risk of wrong-site surgery.

Support Sharps Safety PracticesTransfer trays, scalpel holders and needle counters with blade guards promote sharps safety and help make you OSHA compliant.1

Improve Fluid Disposal SafetyThe Safety-Splash™ fluid management system converts biohazardous fluids into a solid, minimizing the risk of exposure.

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. Medline is a registered trademark of Medline Industries, Inc. Safety-Splash and S.T.O.P are trademarks of Medline Industries, Inc.

References: 1. Occupational Safety and Health Standards, Toxic and Hazardous Substances, Bloodborne pathogens. Regulations (Standards - 29 CFR). Available at: http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=10051#1910.1030(d)(2)(i). Accessed October 13, 2010.

Medline’s Gold Standard safety products stand out against the sea of blue in the OR to alert the surgical team to focus on safety.

Medline Gold StandaRd Safety CoMponentS

Safety DESERVES ATTENTION

Download a QR Code Reader app

Launch the QR app

Scan this QR Code or visit http://www.medline.com/programs/gold-standard-safety-program/

1

2

3

LEARN MORE ABOUT MEDLINE’S GOLD STANDARD SAFETY PRODUCTS

Page 39: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 39

be finished by 5 pm. We have one or two rooms that can run longer for emergencies, transplants, and the other things. But it’s confined to a small group of people who know they are on call for that evening and that they are at risk for running longer. So, we plan it that way. This has dramatically cut down on turnover. It’s made us a popular place to work. We now have a waiting list for people who want to work in our ORs.

SM: How many OR suites do you have? Dr. Rupp: 18.

SM: How many surgeries do you do?Dr. Rupp: Approximately 12,400 surgical procedures per year.

Sue: And what type of surgeries do you specialize in? Dr. Rupp: Very complex patients. We are a major transplant facil-ity. We do about 400 solid organ transplants a year. We do very complex cardiology procedures. As well as complex valves with very sick patients. If you think of health care as a pyramid, we do the very top of the pyramid. We do almost all the intra-cerebral bleeds for 100 miles around. Because we have people who can fish those clots out or coil the aneurysm, even when it is the most difficult thing. We have data that shows that we get the sickest and most complex patients in all of Florida.

SM: Describe some of the things that you’ve personally done to improve performance. Dr. Rupp: It’s my continuing role to focus on quality, safety and service. If you ask our staff what I’m about, they will tell you qual-ity, safety and service. Now, I don’t ignore a financial bottom line. I am responsible and accountable for producing a bottom line. But with a professional staff, that bottom line comes if we focus on quality, safety and service ... The dollars just follow.

SM: I’ve heard you referred to as the “barrier buster.” How did you get that name? Dr. Rupp: I think that my major job is to take down barriers. I keep telling our people that if you want me to come and fix your problem that’s pretty scary because I do not know anything about what you do on the frontline. So if you want me to fix your problem from the desk you are in real trouble. Now you work in it all the time and know about it. My job is for you to say that you have a problem or a barrier that is keeping you from making it better for patients or whomever else. Fine. I will help you get rid of that barrier but I’m not going to get lost in the details.

SM: So, you help them break down barriers that have been in place forever? Dr. Rupp: Yes. So much of what we do was done for a good reason sometime back. And yet things have changed and we’ve got all these things still in place that we’ve always done. To me, the most frightening words in health care are “We’ve always done it that way.”

SM: How can we improve the physician/nurse relationship? Dr. Rupp: One of the biggest ways is going to be simulation.

SM: Why do you say that?Dr. Rupp: I think simulation will revolutionize medical education. The ability to work in a simulation center is going to change much of what we do.

SM: Do you have a simulation center? Dr. Rupp: Yes, every one of the three major Mayo sites has one. For example, the ability for a team to practice putting in a central line, not just the doctor, but also the nurse who that doctor is go-ing to be working with, or the tech, or whoever it is. We are doing some interesting exercises right now on the deteriorating patient: the one who is starting to get real sick. And what does the team do with that? The ability to go in and do it in the simulation center, then later sit back with everybody and watch the video that we made. You can actually watch what worked well, what did not work well, what communication was good, what communication wasn’t good, and evaluate what you learned, and then do it all over again.

Promote Correct-Site Surgery Our Surgical Time Out Procedure (S.T.O.P.™) safety products alert the surgical team to perform a time-out verification and help reduce the risk of wrong-site surgery.

Support Sharps Safety PracticesTransfer trays, scalpel holders and needle counters with blade guards promote sharps safety and help make you OSHA compliant.1

Improve Fluid Disposal SafetyThe Safety-Splash™ fluid management system converts biohazardous fluids into a solid, minimizing the risk of exposure.

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. Medline is a registered trademark of Medline Industries, Inc. Safety-Splash and S.T.O.P are trademarks of Medline Industries, Inc.

References: 1. Occupational Safety and Health Standards, Toxic and Hazardous Substances, Bloodborne pathogens. Regulations (Standards - 29 CFR). Available at: http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=10051#1910.1030(d)(2)(i). Accessed October 13, 2010.

Medline’s Gold Standard safety products stand out against the sea of blue in the OR to alert the surgical team to focus on safety.

Medline Gold StandaRd Safety CoMponentS

Safety DESERVES ATTENTION

Page 40: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

40 The OR Connection

SM: How do you get the physician to do that – to take the time to do that? Dr. Rupp: That is part of our job as physicians. This is what is required at Mayo. If you are going to put in central lines in this institution, you have to go through the simulation center.

SM: Do you make the simulation center a requirement? For physicians?Dr. Rupp: Yes.

SM: Is that normal? Dr. Rupp: It is here! It’s a growing segment in the things we do. If we have an issue, we want to use simulation. You don’t get to say no. We simulate as much as we can. We have even had a housekeeping crew say, “We have a way of cleaning a room that might be faster and safer and we’d like to try it.” Great! Go to the simulation center.

SM: Do they act it out, work it through, and then demonstrate their findings? Dr. Rupp: Yes. And sometimes even more than that. What hap-pens in the simulation center is that we have mannequins and dummies. Our staff gets incredibly involved with these manne-quins. The mannequins do everything. They talk, and we even have one that will vomit on you.

SM: Are you serious? Dr. Rupp: I’ve seen incidents in simulations where after resusci-tation nurses don’t want to leave the “patient.” I think to myself, you know, it’s a dummy, but they still do not want to leave. People get incredibly involved in it.

SM: How long have you had the simulation center?Dr. Rupp: Mayo has had one in Rochester for about five or six years. Arizona got theirs three years ago. Our temporary one went up a year ago, and we’ve put 3,000 people through it so far.

SM: So this is a pretty new thing? Dr. Rupp: Yes.

SM: Have you seen a difference in the relationships?Dr. Rupp: Yes. It helps the relationships. There’s also a focus on the fact that we are not perfect at teamwork, but we try. Some-body asked me the other day, who are your superstars? And I said, “Superstars at Mayo do not do very well. We don’t have superstars. We have superstar teams.” In this day and age with medicine and its complexity a superstar cannot survive here alone. A superstar needs a team around him or her to provide great care. So the focus is on teamwork. We actually have cours-es on how to have conversations, especially with somebody who may be a little difficult. The book is called Crucial Conversations.

Page 41: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 41

SM: I’ll have to read it when I get home.Dr. Rupp: Oh, it’s great. It teaches the skills for how to inter-act with difficult subjects. We teach doctors how to deliver bad news. How you handle an angry patient. It teaches skills that aren’t normally taught in our professional training.

Dr. Rupp: Now, let’s take a walk. I’d like to show you some of our campus.

SM: Wow. Is this a new building? I really like the look of it. I love the workspaces outside the rooms. Dr. Rupp: And there’s a workstation in each room as well. Here’s one of our quality boards.

SM: It’s out for everybody to see. Wow! They have not had a “Fall” since November. Dr. Rupp: In this unit.

Dr. Rupp: We belong to a patient satisfaction group called PRC. It includes more than 300 hospitals—mostly academic medical centers. We were the number one hospital in patient satisfac-tion in 2009 and 2010. We don’t have the 2011 results yet. So, among those 300 or so hospitals, we had the highest patient satisfaction of anyone.

SM: Wow! I love how you have this published like this. I love the nurse stations. That’s really good. Dr. Rupp: You see that every room on the floor is identical. From the patient area, to the family area, to the staff area.

SM: They are good spaces. Dr. Rupp: Yes. Especially, the staff area and their workstations.

SM: And the workstations are not on top of the patients. The rooms are spacious. Nice. This was well thought out. Dr. Rupp: The hallways are pretty wide too. Over here is the cleaning supplies room. Every supply room is the same. Ev-erything is in the same place in every supply room. Nurses can float floor to floor, and the arrangement is all the same. They did this as a “lean” project. People used to come in here and spend 20 minutes looking for something, and when they found it, they did not bother to charge for it. Now they come in, get what they want, they charge for it, and go.

SM: You’ve done so much work. Dr. Rupp: We have great people here.

Crucial ConversationsTools for Talking When Stakes Are Highby Kerry Patterson, Joseph Grenny, Ron McMillan & Al Switzler If you feel stuck — in a relationship, in your career, at home — chances are a crucial con-versation is keeping you there. The summary of this New York Times bestseller will help you handle crucial conversations — conversations that occur when the stakes are high, emotions run strong, and opinions vary. With crucial conversations skills, you’ll be able to: prepare for high-stakes situations with a proven technique; transform anger and hurt feelings into power-ful dialogue; make it safe to talk about almost anything; be persuasive, not abrasive; improve nearly every professional and personal relationship; and yield major professional improvements in areas like productivity, quality, safety, diversity, and change management.

Page 42: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

42 The OR Connection

Dr. Rupp: As you can see, our hospital is connected to our clinic buildings. Everything is together. So, for example, if you’re in your clinic office and the hospital calls and says, “Mr. Smith is not looking good,” you can literally be at the patient’s bedside in one to two minutes, or they’ll say, “Oh, no he’s doing fine,” and you can go back to your office.

Dr. Rupp: This entire facility is literally built on a 100-year plan. So, everything can go up and flip over. The hospital is six sto-ries. It can go up 10 more. This building can go up six more stories, and then it can flip over and go up again.

SM: So, you build it for the future. That’s really smart. Dr. Rupp: This is all about value, you know. The value goes into the patient. And it’s all these little kinds of things that dem-onstrate that.

SM: What have you learned about how to resonate with the people who can make a difference here, whether it’s the board or the staff?

Dr. Rupp: Staff and healthcare professionals get turned on by making things better for their patients, by delivering better care. They don’t get turned on by saving money or making mon-

ey for the organization. In fact, they are naturally suspicious that you do that at the cost of hurting somebody or not giving somebody everything that we could. They get very turned on by making the quality better. And then over time, we get to teach that when you make the quality better you also save a lot of money ... and with that money we can then turn around and fund education. We have 169 residents right now. We funded about 110 of them this year. And we put $800 million into basic science research last year.

SM: I’d like to thank you again for being so generous with your time. It has been very enlightening. Dr. Rupp: You are more than welcome. Come back any time.

View from Dr Rupp’s office. The best views are reserved for patient rooms.

Page 43: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

HOW ARE YOU DOING WITH SCIP #9?

Reference1 Saint S, Kaufman SR, Thompson M, Rogers MA, Chenoweth CE. A reminder reduces urinary catheterization in hospitalized patients. Jt Comm J Quality Patient Saf. 2005; 31(8): 455-462 2 Patient Safety Quality Measures for the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP). Health Services Advisory Group. Available at: http://qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/content.aspx?f=rss&id=16275. Accessed December 7, 2010.3 Guideline for Prevention of Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infections, 2009. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/cauti/001_cauti.html. Accessed December 7, 2010.

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. Medline is a registered trademark and InserTag is a trademark of Medline Industries, Inc.

Despite SCIP Measure #9 recommending removal of urinary catheters in surgical patients by postoperative day one or two,1 and CDC guidelines advising prompt removal of catheters,2 74 percent of hospitals do not keep track of how long patients have catheters in place.3

Medline’s Foley InserTag is a sticker to be placed on each catheter bag as part of the insertion procedure. It has space to write when the catheter was placed in order to minimize duration and encourage timely removal. The InserTag is included with each Medline ERASE CAUTI tray.

Medline’s Foley InserTag. The one little sticker that can make all the difference.

This easy documentation tool lets you know exactly when your patient’s catheter was placed

Finally! A way to know when the catheter was placed

Foley InserTag

Download a QR Code Reader app

Launch the QR app

Scan this QR Code or visit http://www.erasecauti.com/

1

2

3

LEARN MORE ABOUT THE ERASE CAUTI SYSTEM

Medline’s Foley InserTag™

Page 44: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

SAFER CATHETERIZATION FOR KIDS

Sometimes, you just need a buddy. Buddy the Brave lion cub is here to help your youngest catheter patients. Along with some serious patient (and parent) education resources, you’ll find some upbeat fun and even a bravery award sticker in every tray.

But it’s more than just fun. There’s published evidence that distraction helps children tolerate unpleasant procedures better than adult reassurance does.

You trust Medline for clinical innovations, such as our industry-leading catheter tray design. Now, we can be your patient’s buddy, too.

Introducing Medline’s new Pediatric Catheter Tray. The latest addition to the innovative ERASE CAUTI™ product line.

I’m BraveI’m Brave

Like B uddyLike B uddy

I’m BraveI’m Brave

Like B uddyLike B uddy

I’m BraveI’m Brave

Like B uddyLike B uddy

I’m BraveI’m Brave

Like B uddyLike B uddy

I’m BraveI’m Brave

Like B uddyLike B uddy

I’m BraveI’m Brave

Like B uddyLike B uddy

Pediatric Catheter Tray

Children’sActivities

Bravery Sticker

1

2

3

LEARN MORE ABOUT MEDLINE’S ERASE CAUTI PROGRAM AND ALTERNATIVES TO CATHETERIZATION

Download a QR Code Reader app

Launch the QR app

Scan this QR Code or visit http://www.erasecauti.com/ buddy-the-brave©2011 Medline Industries, Inc. Medline is a registered trademark of Medline Industries, Inc.

ERASE CAUTI and Buddy the Brave are trademarks of Medline Industries, Inc.

Page 45: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 45

SAFER CATHETERIZATION FOR KIDS

Children’sActivities

Introducing

Abby!Nothing is more special than the birth of a child. Labor

& delivery nurse Abby helps create the best birth experi-

ences. She comforts baby and mom with her words,

touch and kindness. Her patients feel happy and cared

for—even pampered. Abby communicates with an under-

standing ear, helps the mom-to-be express her wishes

and advocates for her needs. Abby is a true healthcare

professional, delivering the quality care that helps keep

her hospital the favorite in the community.

To order your own Abby doll, visit www.scrubs123.com

In the puzzle featured in the last issue of The OR Connection, we missed mentioning that the clinician in the photos should have been wearing sterile gloves. Thank you to reader Mike Koball, RN, BSN, Clinical Manager of Surgical Services at Venice Regional Medical Center, for discovering our oversight.

CorrectionPatient Safety Mystery Message Answer, Volume 6, Issue 2

Page 46: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

46 The OR Connection

While most types of healthcare-associated infections are declin-ing, C. difficile infections are at an all-time high. Although 94 percent of C. difficile infections occur in healthcare settings, few of them are due to hospital exposure, according to a new report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About 25 percent of C. difficile infections first present symptoms in hospital patients; 75 percent first show in nursing home patients or in people recently cared for in doctors’ offices and clinics.

The report highlights three programs showing early success in reducing C. difficile infection rates in hospitals. The 71 hospi-tals participating in the programs in Illinois, Massachusetts and New York decreased C. difficile infections by 20 percent in less than two years by following infection control recommendations. To download a copy of the report, go to: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/wk/mm61e0306.pdf.

C. difficile causes diarrhea linked to 14,000 American deaths each year. Those most at risk are older adults who take an-tibiotics and also receive medical care. When a person takes antibiotics, resident bactheria that protect against infection are destroyed for several months. During this time, patients can get sick from C. difficile picked up from contaminated surfaces or spread from a healthcare provider’s hands.

C. difficile causes many Americans to become sick or die.• DeathsrelatedtoC. difficile increased 400% between 2000 and 2007, due in part to a stronger germ strain.•MostC. difficile infections are connected with receiving medical care.• Almosthalfofinfectionsoccurinpeopleyoungerthan65, but more than 90 percent of deaths occur in people 65 and older.• Infectionriskgenerallyincreaseswithage;childrenareat lower risk.

PATIENT SAFETY NEWSPATIENT SAFETY NEWS

C. diff Infection Rates at Historical HighNew CDC report offers facts and solutions

Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/hai/?s_cid=bb-vitalsigns-115

C. difficile moves with patients from one healthcare facility to another, infecting other patients.• HalfofallhospitalizedpatientswithC. difficile infections have the infection when admitted and may spread it within the facility.• Themostdangeroussourceofspreadtoothersis patients with diarrhea.• Unnecessaryantibioticuseinpatientsatonefacilitymay increase the spread of C. difficile in another facility when patients transfer.•Whenapatienttransfersfromonefacilitytoanother, healthcare providers are not always told that the patient has or recently had a C. difficile infection, so they may not take the right precautions to prevent spread.

C. difficile infections can be prevented.• Earlyresultsfromhospitalpreventionprojectsshow20 percent fewer C. difficile infections in less than two years with infection prevention and control measures.•C. difficile infection rates decreased by more than half in hospitalsinEnglandinthreeyearsbyusinginfectioncontrol recommendations and more careful antibiotic use.

Page 47: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 4747 The OR Connection

Lean tools and concepts reduce waste, improve efficiency

Kimberly T. Komer, MBA, RN, NE-BC

Nicole M. Hartman, MSN, RN

Angela Agee, ADN, RN, CMSRN

Maria McNally, BSN, RN, CMSRN

A Magnet™ organization goes lean, with nurses playing a key role in the culture change.

Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/hai/?s_cid=bb-vitalsigns-115

Page 48: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

48 The OR Connection

Hospitals increasingly are implementing quality-improvement systems based on “lean” principles derived largely from the Toyota Production System (TPS). This system, which divides all manufacturing activities into those that add value and those that create waste, aims to eliminate waste and maximize value.

Lehigh Valley Health Network (LVHN), a 988-bed Magnet™ organization in eastern Pennsylvania, is committed to a formal approach of lean methods, termed the System for Partners in Performance Improvement (SPPI).

The goal is to discover more efficient ways to provide health care by using lean tools and

concepts that reduce waste and repetition. SPPI aims to identify and remove obstacles to

service delivery using two simple concepts:

1) respect for people, patients, and society

2) continuous improvement

Focusing on these concepts guides LVHN staff to deliver excellent care while reducing costs and improving efficiency. LVHN services a population of about 700,000. Its nearly 10,000 employees include approximately 2,400 nurses. In 2008, it embarked on the SPPI journey, which built on the existing culture of performance improvement. SPPI allows nurses at all levels to influence changes throughout LVHN—a key characteristic of a Magnet organization.

Eliminating wasteTPS concepts have been used in the business world for decades and have become popular in health care. Healthcare leaders believe patients are willing to pay for quality care—that they go to the hospital to be diagnosed, treated, and discharged, but aren’t willing to pay for more than that (deemed waste).

So how do you remove waste from hospital processes to improve efficiency and patient outcomes? Before waste can be removed, it must be identified clearly. TPS identifies seven non-value-added wastes in business. In his 2009 book, Lean Hospitals: Improving Quality, Patient Safety, and Employee

Satisfaction, Mark Graban modified the definitions of these wastes to apply to health care. (See table on the next page, “Eight Wastes in Health Care.”)

Page 49: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 49

Eight Wastes in Health CareThe seven non-value-added wastes identified in the Toyota Production System have been expanded

to eight and modified for health care, as represented by the acronym and mnemonic U-WITH-D-MOP.

Waste Examples

Unused human potential

• Untapped creativity

• Untapped talent

• Injuries

Waiting • Delay in patients, providers, and materials

Inventory• Stacks of work

• Piles of supplies

Transportation • Transporting people and paperwork

Defects• Wrong information

• Need to repeat work already done

Motion

• Finding information by going through the physical motions

• Double entry of data

• Searching for data, patient information, etc

Overproduction• Duplication

• Extra information

Processing• Extra steps and checks

• WorkaroundsContinued on page 51

Page 50: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Freedom to care more and compromise less.You are the definit ion of a patient advocate. With new 3M ™ K ind Removal Silicone Tape, we’ve redefined the standard for keeping patients healthy and comfortable. Engineered to live up to its name, 3M ™ K ind Removal S i l icone Tape stays f irmly in place until you decide otherwise, yet removes cleanly without any undue pain.

That’s right. Securement without sacrifice is finally within reach.

Experience unequaled confidence for yourself. For more information or to order, contact your local Medline Sales Representative or call 1-800-Medline.

you + blueTechnology makes it simple. You make it happen.

© 3

M 2

012.

All

Righ

ts R

eser

ved.

3M

and

the

shad

e of

col

or b

lue

are

trade

mar

ks o

f 3M

.

Medline # Description

Single Use RollsMMM2770S1 1 in. × 1.5 yd. (2.5 cm × 1.3 m)MMM2770S2 2 in. × 1.5 yd. (5.0 cm × 1.3 m)

Medline # Description

Standard RollsMMM27701Z 1 in. × 5.5 yd. (2.5 cm × 5.0 m)MMM27702Z 2 in. × 5.5 yd. (5.0 cm × 5.0 m)

Page 51: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 51

Defining a value streamThe journey to go lean begins with defining a value stream—the specific process used to provide a service to customers. To do this, LVHN’s senior leadership had to answer such questions as: What do patients want from LVHN? What are they willing to pay for? As they did so, they defined a value stream focusing on improving access and use of services. Then they broke this concept down into value stream 1, which centered on inpatient services, and value stream 2, centering on perioperative services.

Once the value streams had been defined, the new goal was to make value flow seamlessly through all departments to ensure excellent, efficient care. Each unit or department has a specific function; interactions among departments can make or break the patient experience. All areas and departments affected by a process must participate in strategies aimed at removing waste and improving efficiencies.

The five days of an RIETo improve the value flow, the SPPI process used rapid improvement events (RIEs) for each area identified in the value stream. An RIE is a 5-day, continual-improvement event geared toward identifying wastes in a process, developing and testing possible solutions through experiments, and implementing changes to improve service to customers.

The RIE was conducted at the site of the problem. Members selected for each RIE included frontline staff and management from all units involved with the process, as well as “outside eyes” (persons with no direct involvement in the process change). Value stream 1 consisted of seven different RIEs.

Throughout the RIE process, lean tools and concepts were used to detail the current state, conduct experiments, and develop processes to achieve the target state. (See table on the next page, “Going Lean: Tools and Concepts.”

For each day of the RIE, participants strove to accomplish a specific goal:

Day 1: Define the current state—the process taking place at this moment.

Day 2: Create the target state—where you want to be, the direction in which you want to go. The target state may not be your final result because it evolves over time; at some point, it becomes the current state again and the process begins anew. Experiments (solutions or countermeasures) are developed to eliminate waste.

Day 3: Take action by testing the experiments developed on Day 2 to achieve the target state. Some experiments may fail, but these failures let you tweak the countermeasures to find what works best.

Day 4: Identify the process that effectively eliminates waste and improves the value stream. Finalize the new process and develop standard work to achieve the target state. Identify metrics to measure the effectiveness of the new process.

Day 5: Report to the organization and celebrate successful RIE completion. The team shares the new process and standard work done to achieve the target state. Information sharing is crucial to sustaining changes. However, check-ins must be done at 30, 60, and 90 days, when necessary changes can be made. The “feed forward” process continues with each change to ensure the target state becomes the new current state.

Freedom to care more and compromise less.You are the definit ion of a patient advocate. With new 3M ™ K ind Removal Silicone Tape, we’ve redefined the standard for keeping patients healthy and comfortable. Engineered to live up to its name, 3M ™ K ind Removal S i l icone Tape stays f irmly in place until you decide otherwise, yet removes cleanly without any undue pain.

That’s right. Securement without sacrifice is finally within reach.

Experience unequaled confidence for yourself. For more information or to order, contact your local Medline Sales Representative or call 1-800-Medline.

you + blueTechnology makes it simple. You make it happen.

© 3

M 2

012.

All

Righ

ts R

eser

ved.

3M

and

the

shad

e of

col

or b

lue

are

trade

mar

ks o

f 3M

.

Medline # Description

Single Use RollsMMM2770S1 1 in. × 1.5 yd. (2.5 cm × 1.3 m)MMM2770S2 2 in. × 1.5 yd. (5.0 cm × 1.3 m)

Medline # Description

Standard RollsMMM27701Z 1 in. × 5.5 yd. (2.5 cm × 5.0 m)MMM27702Z 2 in. × 5.5 yd. (5.0 cm × 5.0 m)

Page 52: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

52 The OR Connection

Lean tool or concept Description and purpose

Communication circle: visual mapping of all communication in all directions among all people involved

• Reveals the number of stakeholders involved• Exposes all communication channels• Displays movement of information • Visualizes waste of overprocessing information

Spaghetti diagram: visual mapping of all physi-cal movements in all directions among all people involved

• Visualizes movement of people in work area• Exposes wastes of motion and transportation• Reveals inefficient layouts• Displays long distances traveled between process steps• Identifies material and information flow through process

Process mapping: visual mapping of all steps of process

• Visualizes process from customer’s eyes • Identifies value and non-value-added process steps• Provides a common framework

65 sequence: procedure to remove waste, improve efficiency, and standardize steps of a process to achieve and sustain target state

• Sort: Remove items not needed daily.• Set in order: Label items and make it obvious where they belong.• Shine and sweep: Clean and inspect everything inside and out. Visually sweep area to make sure everything is in its place.• Safety: Display required safety information and clearly identify exits wand emergency equipment.• Standardize: Establish policies and standard work.• Sustain: Develop training and detail daily activities or self audits to ensure that process change “sticks.”

Standard work: detailed process for everyone to follow when doing a task to ensure consistent results

• Details most efficient process to perform a service• Develops set of procedures to execute consistently for given task

Going Lean: Tools and ConceptsDuring the System for Partners in Performance Improvement process, the Lehigh Valley Health Network

used the lean tools and concepts below to detail the current state, conduct experiments, and develop

processes to achieve the target state.

Continued on page 54

Page 53: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

The benefits of countingand detection in one advanced system.

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. Medline is a registered trademark of Medline Industries, Inc.SmartSponge is a registered trademark and SmartWand-DTX is a trademark of ClearCount Medical Solutions.

The SmartSponge® System takes the worry out of finding and counting surgical sponges

There’s no greater relief than getting an accurate surgical sponge count. The SmartSponge System counts, locates and recounts each sponge up to 80,000 times during a single surgery. And because it is the only FDA-approved system that uses radio-frequency identification, it uniquely identifies each sponge, so you can use the SmartWand-DTX™ to find missing sponges below, beside or inside a patient

Download a QR Code Reader app

Launch the QR app

Scan this QR Code or visit http://www.medline.com/programs/clear-count-smart-sponge-system/

1

2

3

LEARN MORE ABOUT THE SMARTSPONGE SYSTEM

Page 54: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

54 The OR Connection

Lean principles in actionOne area of needed improvement identified in value stream 1 was inpatient physical discharge. Here’s how LVHN used the RIE process to improve the discharge process.

Day 1: Participants identified key discharge problems. These problems included lack of a standard discharge process and a majority of discharges occurring in the late afternoon, which created significant capacity issues. LVHN needed to establish standardized discharge expectations—not only for patients and families, but also for nurses and physicians.

The current state was further defined using the following metrics:

• average acute length of stay: 5.7 days

• 5% of discharged patients left before 11 a.m., even though 46% of discharge orders were written or entered before 11 a.m.

• average “order to discharge” elapsed time: 3.05 hours

• 34% of discharges completed within 2 hours of order

• 75% of discharges occurring after 1 p.m.

Clearly, a communication gap existed among the interdisciplinary team, which caused a delay in discharges.

Day 2: Participants determined the target state to delineate how the discharge process should be conducted to eliminate waste. Improvements in flow, patient satisfaction, and utilization were the desired outcomes.

• Flow: Develop a standard collaborative discharge process to promote efficient communication among all multidisciplinary team members.

• Patient satisfaction: Increase patient and family satisfaction with the robust discharge process.

• Utilization: Involve multidisciplinary team members at the patient’s bedside, including staff from all shifts.

Next, the RIE team applied lean tools. A communication circle showing everyone involved in the discharge process was created to illustrate all interpersonal communications. A gap analysis was conducted by shadowing staff during the discharge process to identify where and when most discharge work occurred. When the RIE group analyzed the information gathered using lean tools, it became obvious that the discharge workload needed to be leveled out among all shifts and communication needed to be more frequent and more efficient.

Page 55: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 55

Metric

Fiscal year 2008 (baseline)

Target

Fiscal year 2009 (actual)

Glycemic control 63.7% > 75% 75%

Overall patient satisfaction 82.6% 85.5% 85.9%

Productivity

Employee satisfaction(measured on a Likert scale of 1-5) 3.79 4 3.65

Cost/adjusted admission $12,038 $12,337 $12,276

Patient flow

Length of stay 6.02 days 5.45 days 5.52 days

Emergency department (ED) diversions 150.5 hours 0 hours 14.9 hours

Time from ED to bed 129 minutes 60 minutes 95 minutes

Value Stream 1: Outcome MetricsTo track the success of implemented process changes, the metrics below were derived by project sponsors

of the System for Partners in Performance Improvement process, in conjunction with participants from each

of the seven rapid improvement events conducted for value stream 1.

Page 56: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

56 The OR Connection

Days 3 and 4: Participants tested proposed experiments, which included posting door signs indicating a potential discharge, using a discharge checklist with assigned tasks for each shift, and instituting collaborative discharge rounds. The checklist included such items as resolving or completing care plans, conducting patient education, and reconciling patient belongings. A color-coded key on the checklist identified which tasks the discharging nurse must complete and which tasks other nurses could complete. Thus, on the day of discharge, it would be clear which tasks still needed to be resolved before the patient could be discharged.

Throughout the RIE process, participants indicated that we needed to work at communicating better with each other. A successful experiment to help establish this was implementing a daily rounding process at 10 a.m. involving nurses, physicians, physician assistants, and case managers to discuss patient discharge plans. This procedure has been invaluable, further ensuring timely discharge and enhancing interdisciplinary communication.

Day 5: “Feed forward” occurred. Successful experiments and newly developed standard work were reported to all of LVHN. Follow-up at 30, 60, and 90 days continued to show the new discharge processes were effective and the target state had been achieved.

Value stream 1 outcomesOverall, the SPPI effort at LVHN has reduced length of stay, improved patient satisfaction, decreased emergency department (ED) diversions, and reduced time from the ED to the bed. (See table, “Value Stream 1: Outcome Metrics, previous page.)

Although work remains to be done and new processes to further improve metrics continue, lean thinking has become enculturated among all LVHN staff. Many staff members now use these techniques throughout all aspects of their work. Living the RIE process has given staff at all levels a better understanding of organizational processes.

As a Magnet organization, LVHN ensures that nurses stay at the forefront of organizational change. The lean tools and concepts used since SPPI inception have become part of daily nursing practice. The integral role nurses have played in SPPI is another example of what it means to work at LVHN. Going lean is a journey—one that allows us to continually improve our health network and the way we provide care to the community.

Selected referencesGraban M. Lean Hospitals: Improving Quality, Patient Safety, and Employee Satisfaction. New York, NY: Productivity Press; 2009.

Liker JK. The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2003.

The authors work at Lehigh Valley Health Network in eastern Pennsylvania. Kimberly T. Korner is director of patient care services. Nicole M. Hartman is a nursing excellence specialist. Angela Agee is a staff nurse in the medical-surgical unit. Maria McNally is a patient care specialist in the medical-surgical unit.

Reprinted with permission. American Nurse Today. Volume 6, Number 3. www.AmericanNurseToday.com

Overall, the SPPI effort at LVHN has

reduced length of stay, improved

patient satisfaction, decreased

emergency department (ED)

diversions and reduced time from

the ED to the bed.

Page 57: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. Medline is a registered trademark of Medline Industries, Inc. Assure and Revive are trademarks of Biomerix Corporation. CABS Air and 4DDOME are registered trademarks of Cousin Biotech LLC. MotifMESH and VitaMESH are registered trademarks of Proxy Biomedical Limited, LLC.

1

2

3

Download a QR Code Reader app

Launch the QR app

Scan this QR Code or visit http://www.medlinesurgicalmesh.com/

LEARN MORE ABOUT MEDLINE’S COMPLETE SELECTION OF HERNIA MESH

Innovative, high-quality hernia repair solutions

MotifMesh®VitaMesh®

4D Dome®Cabs Air®Assure™ Revive™

Page 58: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

58 The OR Connection

Naomi JuddHow her tragic illness led to a healthcare safety crusade

Page 59: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Before her rise to stardom beginning in the mid-1980s, Naomi Judd was a single mother of two young daughters, Wynonna and Ashley, who was constantly struggling to make ends meet. Working various office and waitressing jobs, and picking up singing gigs here and there, she ultimately put herself through nursing school to make a better life for herself and her girls.

“I worked as an RN in ICU at a hospital in Franklin, TN, while my girls were in school and before we started our singing career. And because of the fast-paced, life-and-death atmosphere of the unit, I received multiple needlesticks. I had people vomiting all sorts of bodily fluids on me. It was just part of my everyday shift. So I really didn’t think much of it back then. And this was 1983 – when I wore my last support hose – when I quit working. Actually, it was Valentine’s Day. I remember it very well. I remember taking Valentines for all the girls.”

Naomi left nursing in 1983 to pursue her singing career with her daughter Wynonna. It would be many years until her Hepatitis C diagnosis.

The OR Connection recently had the opportunity to interview

country music Icon and registered nurse Naomi Judd about

her experience with a needlestick that led to a diagnosis of

Hepatitis C years later at the peak of her singing career.

“Those years – in 1983,” she continued, “we didn’t know much about AIDS, Hepatitis C. They never told us about Hepatitis B or any of the dangers we would be facing every time we walked onto the unit. I now know that 85 percent of the etiology is unknown when it comes to needlesticks. It’s just par for the course. I never once remember anyone being sent to the lab

to get blood drawn to check for a blood borne disease. Of course, I realize now that Hepatitis C is a bloodborne disease. I’ve never had a tattoo, of course I’ve never done IV drugs. I’ve never had an organ transplant or a blood transfusion. I’ve never shared a razor or a toothbrush with anyone who had Hepatitis C. I’m pretty sure that I got Hepatitis C during my ICU days.”

Naomi’s journey with Hepatitis C“When I was first diagnosed, I was misdiagnosed. And for years before, no one paid attention to me. All the doctors said it was stress because of my travel schedule and my successful lifestyle challenges. I couldn’t get anyone to pay attention.”

Center photo: Before her singing career, Naomi Judd was an RN in an ICU where she endured multiple needlesticks.

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 59

Page 60: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

60 The OR Connection

Hepatitis C symptoms are vague—fatigue, nausea, depression—and can be attributed to many different conditions. And blood tests in the 1980s were not very reliable.

“I fell through the cracks over and over again. Nobody checked again after I was given the very first prototype Hepatitis C test. I was told I was false-positive. I was negative: non-A, non-B, non-C in 1989. So I walked around for a long time thinking that I had this unknown liver inflammation. Of course, it was fulminating. I remember getting a liver biopsy, and that is the definitive test. The ALT and AST blood tests can vary. The gold standard will always be that pathology slide. It was not good. They told me I had less than three years to live.”

Finally enjoying a successful singing career and all the financial rewards that come with it, Naomi’s Hepatitis C diagnosis was a huge emotional blow.

“But, I say he who looks back with regret dies with remorse. And the truth is, I would never have had medical coverage, I would never have had the resources that I did get because of becoming a celebrity. And it’s weird, but I have to tell you, in all of this, I somehow knew in my essence and my core that I was going to be OK.”

Naomi put her music career on hold in 1991 to concentrate on her health. She studied the liver and its many functions. She looked for answers and never gave up. She fought severe depression, which is one of the many side effects of Hepatitis C. She sought high-quality medical care, psychological therapy and holistic methodologies including guided imagery, aromatherapy, music therapy, massage and biofeedback.

“I used everything that was good, that was enlightening. I tried to stay in the moment. I tried to stay in present-moment awareness with God. And anything that didn’t work, I flipped a mental switch and called it mental malpractice and got rid of it.

“I live in nature. I have my four dogs. I don’t have a computer. I don’t have a cell phone. I stayed with people who are loving; who are kind. I kept an open mind. I worked through this with a feeling of hope. I say hope stands for Healing Of Painful Experiences. I tried to stay focused on the answers; I say I tried, because I did not always succeed because I was so ill. I used positive psychology and stayed focused on everything that made me feel comfortable and at peace and that kept me in the moment.”

Naomi beat the odds. She calls herself a miracle. She said she has been cured of Hepatitis C since 1995. But her involvement with the disease and finding the absolute cure continues.

“I was very lucky. Because of my proactive stance, my pilgrimage to find the right doctor. I volunteered to be the Hepatitis C spokesperson for the American Liver Foundation, and I found a doctor – Dr. Bruce Bacon at St. Louis University. He was the medical advisor, and I was the media person, the face. We started working together.

“Now I’m working with a neurologist in Naples, Florida, Dr. David Perlmutter. He’s very much in the vanguard, and we’re starting to put together a futuristic neurology clinic to help people understand how the mind controls the body. So one of my passions in life is to help find an absolute cure [for Hepatitis C]. And we are getting some fabulous results.”

“Prevention is #1. My whole thing is prevention and wellness. I worked with OSHA to help them develop the retractable needle... As nurses, we have to stay extra vigilant. It’s a war zone. I’m sorry. It just is. And we have to face that reality.

Page 61: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 61

Safer needles“Prevention is #1. My whole thing is prevention and wellness. I worked with OSHA to help them develop the retractable needle. I mean how many times when we’re starting an IV – and we only have two hands – and we’re starting the butterfly and we’re taping it down, and we stick that needle into the chux or into the mattress.

“For three pennies, OSHA developed the retractable needle. We’re always looking for ways to prevent these things. As nurses, we have to stay extra vigilant. It’s a war zone. I’m sorry. It just is. And we have to face that reality.”

Don’t be afraid to speak upNaomi has been an advocate for prevention going back to her nursing school days. In her autobiography, Love Can Build a

Bridge, she wrote there were several times when her somewhat outspoken nature and desire to do the right thing almost got her kicked out of nursing school. One time, in the newborn nursery at a hospital in Kentucky, she observed that the physician failed to wash his hands as he entered. In front of all the other nursing students, Naomi walked up to the doctor to gently remind him he’d forgotten to wash his hands.

She wrote, “The doctor’s oversize ego and my instructor’s embarrassment got me a stern admonishment, but I felt I’d done the right thing. A germ can spread like wildfire through a nursery and wreak havoc on its tiny, fragile victims.”

Naomi was certainly ahead of her time, promoting handwashing and prevention of hospital-acquired infections – and speaking up among her healthcare peers – all the way back in the late 1970s.

She continued in the interview, “Any time you walk into your workplace, it’s exciting. I think all nurses have a thrill gene. If I went back to work right now, there’s no doubt I’d be working the trauma bay at Vanderbilt because I like a high stimulation environment. But, we have to put ourselves first. You have to get out of your overflow. Nurses are incorrigibly bad at not taking themselves seriously, not putting themselves first.

Naomi has been an advocate for prevention since her nursing school days in the 1970s.

Did You Know?It wasn’t until 1991 that OSHA published the first bloodborne pathogens standard to protect healthcare workers against risks posed by needlesticks, HIV and Hepatitis B and C.

Page 62: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

62 The OR Connection

“The second thing is if you should get stuck, you need to get tested immediately. You need to file your reports, you need to cover your butt.”

Focus on yourself and take care of you“Always stay healthy. Do everything that you need to do. Put that cigarette down, girl. Put that cigarette down. Stay away from that stupid vending machine. It breaks my heart.

“I love nurses. I’m still a nurse. Actually, this is ironic. I just got my nurse’s license in the mail this morning when I went to the mailbox. I’m inactive, but every year I send in my hundred bucks because it’s important to me.

“Especially since I’m still in the field, and I’m starting to develop this neuroscience clinic. I’m going to be in it more than ever. “But the other thing is to realize that whatever happens, you’re in charge. I felt so completely helpless and you have to understand that [when you face a serious illness] it is a journey.

Don’t ever let anybody else tell you who you are or what’s going to happen to you.

“Tell nurses I love ‘em. It’s like an exclusive club. You know, when I’m with Dolly or Reba or Taylor Swift, or some of my girlfriends in the industry, we have our own language. We talk about, OK, who’s the best hairdresser in town now, and where’d you get that fabric, and watch out for this psycho fan.

“But with nurses, they’re just like my favorite people. I mean, I see a nurse, and you know, I just hug her. I feel like we have this common gene or something. Thank you all, thank you. Take care of yourselves.”

1. Always stay healthy. Do everything that you need to do.

2. You’re In Charge. Don’t ever let anybody else tell you who you are or what’s going to happen to you.

ADVICE FOR NURSES

Page 63: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 63

74% of nurses report being stuck by a contaminated needle.3

43% of injuries in the O.R. are attributed to suture needles.4

Tips for Avoiding Blood Exposures and Percutaneous Injuries in the Operating Room4

n Use instruments, rather than fingers, to grasp needles, retract tissue and load/unload needles and scalpels

n Give verbal announcements when passing sharps

n Avoid hand-to-hand passage of sharp instruments by using a basin or neutral zone

n Use alternative cutting methods such as blunt electrocautery and laser devices when appropriate

n Substitute endoscopic surgery for open surgery when possible

n Use round-tipped scalpel blades in-stead of pointed sharp-tipped blades

n Double glove

Exposure to Bloodborne

Pathogens Get the

Facts!

References1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). How to protect yourself from needlestick injuries. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2000-135. Accessed March 9, 2012.2. Pyrek KM. Study raises ongoing issue of passive vs. active safety-engineered sharps devices. November 2, 2010. Available at: http://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/articles/2010/11/study-raises-ongoing-issue-of-passive-vs-active-safety-engineered-sharps-devices.aspx. Accessed March 9, 2012.3. American Nurses Association. 2008 Study of Nurses’ Views on Workplace Safety and Needlestick Injuries. Available at: http://www.inviromedical.com/Portals/1/PDFs/2008_Fast_Facts.pdf (ANA/Invira)4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Workbook for Designing, implementing, and Evaluating a Sharps Injury Prevention Program. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/sharpssafety/tools.html. Accessed March 9, 2012.5. O’Connor D. The most dangerous job in surgery? Outpatient Surgery Magazine. March 7, 2012. Available at: http://www.outpatientsurgery.net/news/2012/03/9-The-Most-Dangerous-Job-in-Surgery. Accessed March 9, 2012.

600,000 to 800,000 needlestick injuries occur each year.1”‘‘ Although 86% of

nurses say their department strongly encourages and supports reporting needlestick injuries, 74% of nurses say needlestick injuries still are underreported.3

Completely automatic safety devices are 10 timesmore effective for needlestick prevention compared to devices with automatic or semi-automatic safety features.2

1 in 2 nurses experience blood exposure on their skin or in their eyes, nose or mouth at least once a month when inserting or removing peripheral IV catheters. 5

Page 64: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Safety features so you won’t get stuckA staggering 74 percent of nurses report being stuck by a contaminated needle,1 which can lead to infection with Hepatitis B and C, HIV, and other dangerous bloodborne pathogens. Avoid needlesticks with Medline Safety Syringes. After injection, slide the safety shield forward and simply twist clockwise. Once you hear a click, the needle is fully protected and the syringe is ready for safe and proper disposal.

Medline Safety Syringes also feature:

• Low dead space design to reduce medication waste and expense

• Easy-to-read bold markings

• Insulin and tuberculin versions

©2012 Medline Industries Inc. Medline is a registered trademark of Medline Industries, Inc.

Protect yourself and patients from needlestick injuries

Medline Safety Syringes

American Nurses Association. 2008 Study of Nurses’ Views on Workplace Safety and Needlestick Injuries. Available at: http://nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/Workplac-eSafety/SafeNeedles/2008-Study/2008InviroStudy.pdf. Accessed March 16, 2012.

Injection Safety is Every Provider’s Responsibility

To Prevent Transmission of Infections in Healthcare

1.Reference

Page 65: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 65

Medication Safety in the Operating Room

Many factors can lead to medication errors in the operating room. The types of procedures performed today are technical and complex, and the patient acuity is more severe. Bench-marks such as room turnover times must be met, and distrac-tions are common throughout most procedures. Medication orders are often obtained from the surgeon preference cards which may not be up-to-date. Verbal medication orders are given through a surgical mask, and clinicians may be assigned to an unfamiliar service specialty or procedure. High alert meds such as epinephrine and the “caines” are available in multiple concentrations and dosage forms in the operating room. Additional factors influencing medication errors in the OR include: labeling issues when medication is transferred to the

What is your role?

By Jayne Barkman, BSN, RN, CNOR

Special Feature

Page 66: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

66 The OR Connection

sterile field, poor communication during handoff or end-of-shift reports, knowledge deficits related to medications, and drugs taken from a supply cabinet after the cabinet has been rear-ranged or restocked.1,2

According to the Joint Commission Sentinel Alert Report through September 2011, medication errors were the ninth most frequently reported sentinel event that resulted in death or serious outcomes.3 Since not all sentinel events are reported, it is difficult to ascertain the number of medication errors that actually occurred.

Medication Basics for the Operating Room

• Verify medications visually and verbally between two

qualified people.

• Label medication as soon as it is prepared.

• Make sure medications both on and off the sterile

field are labeled with the proper name, strength,

quantity, diluents, volume and an expiration date

if the med is not used within 24 hours.

• Consider pre-printed labels. Always use a

non-smearing pen to mark blank labels.

• Familiarize yourself with the medications used during

your assigned procedures.

• Avoid distractions when drawing up and delivering

medications to the sterile field.

• Review surgeon preference cards for medication

accuracy and update routinely.

• Make sure drug references are easily accessible for all

perioperative nursing staff via the hospital intranet and

hard copy.

• During endoscopic procedures, ensure there is

adequate lighting when drawing up and dispensing

medications.

• If music is playing in the operating room, keep the

volume low.

• Suggest a medication module be included in the

staff’s annual unit competencies.

• Be aware of patient drug and food allergies.

• Ask for a detailed history of any over-the-counter and

homeopathic medications the patient is taking.

• Contact the hospital pharmacy if you have any

questions pertaining to medications.

• Be your patient’s voice. Speak up and question

medications and doses.

Page 67: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 67

Remember the Five Rights of Medication Administration

According to an analysis of almost 700 operating room medica-tion error reports prepared by the U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP), two of the most common medication errors in the operating room were related to the administering mode of the medication and the improper dose/quantity given.1

As a perioperative nurse, what can you do to ensure medication errors do not occur? Get back to the basics. Be methodical, and avoid distractions to keep your patients safe.

References

1. Becker SC & Hicks RW. Medication Errors in the Operating Room. U.S. Pharmacopeia.

Available at: www.usp.org/hqi/patientSafety/resources/posters/posterOperatingRoom.

html. Accessed February 1, 2012.

2. Medication Errors in the OR. Patient Safety Tip of the Week. March 24, 2009. Available

at: www.patientsafetysolutions.com/tip_of_the_week_archive_jan-mar_2009. Accessed

February 1, 2012.

3. Joint Commission Sentinel Events. Available at http://www.jointcommission.org/

assets/1/18/3Q2011_SE_Stats_Summary.pdf. Accessed February 1, 2012.

1

2

3

4

5

The Right Patient

The Right Medication

The Right Dose

The Right Time

The Right Route

Page 68: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

68 The OR Connection

OR staff improves sharps safetyby making it fun

Rounding Up Compliance

Page 69: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Vangie Dennis, BSN, RN, CNOR, CMLSO, Administrative Director, Spivey Station Surgery Center outside Atlanta, knows how to get her staff’s attention when it comes to safety and compliance – make it fun!

During procedures the “neutral zone” is the holding area for a few surgical instruments, including sharps. The “passing zone” is where a single item is laid down specifically for another person to pick up. This prevents surgeons and nurses from putting themselves in danger of cutting themselves by having to reach in among multiple sharps to find the item they need.

To enhance sharps safety in the OR, Vangie organized a “Neutral Zone Round-Up.” Designated “neu-tral zone sheriffs” wore badges and policed the neutral zone for compliance. They ticketed people they observed using the neutral zone, and each ticket could be cashed in for a candy bar. All tickets were placed in a bucket for a weekly drawing for $10 movie and restaurant gift cards.

Compliance data was recorded and displayed on a “Neutral Zone Roundup” bulletin board. Ticket winners’ photos were also displayed as “Most Wanted” for compliance.

“The rewards weren’t worth much, but you’d be surprised how much they made our staff want to be involved in our safety efforts,” Vangie said.

Feeling left out, surgeons even began asking to participate in the fun compliance activities.

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 69

Page 70: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

70 The OR Connection

FEAR:

HOW TO KILL IT

DEAD!

Page 71: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 71

By Wolf J. Rinke, PhD, RD, CSP

Erik Weihenmeyer successfully climbed Mt. Everest and four of the worlds’ tallest peaks. No big

deal, right? Wrong! It’s a very big deal because Erik is BLIND! Contrast that to the fact that many

of us have difficulty tackling even the most mundane challenges. For example you may be afraid

of asking for that raise you know you have earned. If you’ve had a disagreement with your boss

you may be afraid to talk to her about it. Or you may be avoiding to get in touch with that wonder-

ful young man you met at the party last weekend. What prevents most of us from being more like

Erik? It’s that dirty four letter word: FEAR! Here are six specific strategies you can use to help you

get rid of fear.

HOW TO KILL IT

Page 72: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

72 The OR Connection

Acknowledging that fear of failure is normal allows us to see ourselves as typical human beings instead of “chickens.” It pro-vides us with the mechanism for getting off our case. For most of us, we are the ones who hold us back more than anything or anyone else. Some time ago I shared a taxi with a young man on my way from Chicago’s O’Hare airport to downtown Chicago. He told me that he worked for CBS and was on his way to make a big presentation to the CBS board of directors. When I told him that I was a professional speaker, management consultant, and author he got excited. He immediately began to quiz me on how he could be a more effective presenter for this big meeting he had coming up. I asked him what he wanted to improve. After some prying, he told me he wanted to be less nervous. I asked him why he wanted to do that. When he gave me a funny look that said: Wonder what kind of professional speaker this guy is? I explained that speakers who are not ner-vous are terrible speakers because they are deadly. (Remember that professor that put you to sleep during every lecture?) I assured him that being nervous is a benefit, provided the ner-vous energy is channeled in the right direction. After coaching him, I left him with a thought that he eagerly wrote down: “Every speaker has butterflies. Excellent speakers make the butterflies fly in formation.” One week later he sent me a note together with an order for my book and audio program. In his note he told me that he had made his butterflies fly in formation and that he had made the best presentation of his life. (If you’d like help with this read Knock’em Alive Presentation Skills: How to Make an Effective Presentation for 1 or 1,000, 2nd Edition, (C208), 20 CPEUs, available at wolfrinke.com/CEFILES/cepd.html#C208, or in an e-course format at wolfrinke.com/CEFILES/ecourses.htm#C208.)

1. Acknowledge It

Page 73: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 73

Think about what you fear the most, and do it. Probably the biggest confidence builder in your life is to do the thing you fear. It may be quitting your current job, jumping out of an airplane (do put on a parachute first, and, while you are at it, get some decent instructions too), living in the wilderness, scuba diving, or giving a speech. Do your homework, get yourself mentally and physically condi-tioned, and break the task into small, doable steps so that you can benefit from the principle of incremental success. For ex-ample, tightrope walkers start low to the ground. After they have it mastered at that height, they go up a little bit at a time. When they get dangerously high, they add a safety net. Only after they have mastered the task to the point that they could do it in their sleep do they remove the safety net. After experiencing incre-mental successes at whatever you are afraid of, you will be able to do it, and will no longer be afraid of it. Most importantly, it will empower you and put you in charge of your life, providing you with the confidence of a supremely successful human being.

Whenever I am presented with a challenge that scares me, I ask myself, “What is the worst thing that can possibly happen?” After I identify that, I ask myself, Can you live with that? If the answer is yes, I forget the worst case, vi-sualize myself succeeding, and go for it. If that does not work for you, do a basic Ben Franklin decision making analysis. (Actu-ally Plato came up with it first.) For each option, list the “Pros” and “Cons.” Now pick the option that has the greatest number of Pros and the fewest Cons, and go for it with gusto. (For other useful decision making strategies go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decision_making.)

I have found over the years that the minute I announce an in-novative idea, a new business venture, a great suggestion for an outing, or anything else that is different, there are innumerable people who tell me that it won’t work, is not feasible, or is too risky. The naysayer song goes on and on. If you have worked in a traditional healthcare organization, I know that you too have heard that song many times. That type of advice used to slow me down. It made me cautious, made me rethink my original thoughts, caused me to worry, and led me to focus on all the reasons why something could not work, dissipating my energy to the point that I could no longer see all the reasons why it could work.

Before I knew it, I gave up on what might have been a million-dollar idea. Not anymore. I have developed a simple but pow-erful strategy to silence the naysayers by saying: “I appreciate your concern. Have you yourself done this before?” If the an-swer is no, I thank them for their interest and ignore their advice. On the other hand, if the answer is “yes” I listen attentively so that I can learn from their mistakes. I firmly believe that only the people who have taken the journey and who have experienced the risks are able to provide you with meaningful advice. Most of the others want to be sure that you remain one level below them so that they can feel OK about themselves. After all, if you succeed too much, it might lower their self-esteem.

2. Ignore others

3. Do the Thing You Fear

4. Conduct a Worst-Case Analysis

Page 74: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

74 The OR Connection

All of us are motivated by two very powerful human emotions: fear and desire. Both are extremely powerful and both work equally well, although in opposite directions. To overcome fear, we must recognize that the human mind can only hold one major thought at a time. To take advantage of this phenomenon, we must get in the habit of substituting desire for fear when we communicate with ourselves and with others. Instead of pro-gramming our mind with the things we do not want to have happen we must use the same creative energy to tell ourselves what it is that we want to have happen. Telling ourselves what we want should be supplemented with visualizing what we desire in clear, vivid, dramatic pictures. Once you have formu-lated that picture in your mind, think of all the positive con-sequences associated with succeeding. That way you will be focusing on the rewards of success instead of the penalties of failure.

The PIN technique will help you focus on the positive instead of the negative, see the opportunity instead of the risks, and gen-erally minimize “stinking thinking.” Internalizing and consistently applying the PIN technique has enabled me to transform myself from a perpetual pessimist into an eternal optimist. The PIN technique consists of a three-step mental process that you

5. Replace Fear with Desire can use to first focus on what is positive (P), then on what is interesting or innovative (I), and last on what is negative (N). By PINing it, instead of NIPing it, you will provide yourself with the ability to focus your vast mental energies on positive thoughts instead of squandering them on negative and nonproductive ideas. NIPing it closes the proverbial mental shade whereas PINing it allows you to go beyond your customary response pattern and provides you with a technique that will let you see the hidden opportunities and focus on desire instead of fear.

For other empowering strategies read or listen to Make It a Win-ning Life: Success Strategies for Life, Love or Business available at http://wolfrinke.com/MIWL.html or if you need CPE credits devour How to Maximize Professional Potential and Increase Your Earning Power (C187) approved for 30 CPEUs, available at http://www.wolfrinke.com/CEFILES/cepd.html#C187.)

© 2011 Wolf J. Rinke

6. PIN it

Running for Her

Life

Page 75: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 75

Running for Her

Life

Judy Pickett

By Jennifer Freedman

With just a hint of the sun on the horizon, Judy Pickett laces up her running shoes, pulls on a windbreaker and heads out her front door.

“Running is a part of me,” Pickett explains. “I love the time to decompress, pray and be alone.”

Pickett considers every mile she logs a gift. The 48-year-old wife and mother battled three bouts of breast cancer over a five-year span.

(continued)

Page 76: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

76 The OR Connection

It was November of 1996, when Pickett discovered her first lump. She was 33 and teaching high school science and weekly aerobics classes. She was the picture of health and happiness, but her body was under attack.

“On Thanksgiving Day, we were having a holiday dinner and I had an itchy armpit,” says Pickett. “When I scratched it, I found a lump in my armpit and I knew that it wasn’t supposed to be there.”

At such a young age and with no family history, it took three doctors and three months for Pickett to get a mammogram. The testing led to a grim diagnosis.

“My doctor called at 5 p.m. on a Friday and I was home alone,” remembers Pickett. “He told me I had adenocarcinoma, stage two breast cancer. It was such a shocker. I really did not expect it. I was fine until my husband, Tod, came home and I told him. Then we both started crying and held each other. It was very scary. I thought to myself ‘this sort of thing is not supposed to happen at 33.”

Pickett was emotional. A mom of three boys, the youngest just nine months old, she knew she had to fight back. She had surgery to remove the affected breast and nine cancerous lymph nodes, then nine months of chemotherapy and six weeks of radiation treatments.

During treatment, Pickett says she relied mostly on Tod for support. He would accompany her to every appointment he could. He would talk to the nurses and even bring them gifts. Pickett also credits the nurses for helping her get through her rough days of treatment. In particular, she remembers her first oncology nurse at the infusion clinic.

“We didn’t know how my body would react after the first chemo treatment, so she gave me her home phone number and said to call her if I needed to. It was a Friday afternoon and that night I was so sick. I called her on Saturday morning and she talked me through it. She told me everything would be okay and called in a prescription for an anti-nausea medication. She was truly compassionate.”

Five months after completing chemotherapy, Pickett entered her first Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure in Sacramento.

The race experience left her feeling so good that she decided to keep running. She started the Pink Ribbon Running Club and set a goal to run 100 benefit races in five years, supporting breast cancer awareness and research and spreading a message of hope for cancer survivors.

“I wanted to demonstrate that breast cancer victims can not only survive, they can thrive,” says Pickett.

But, in 1999, she hit a speed bump that would truly test her endurance. The cancer was back. Pickett wondered how this could be happening.

“It was really devastating,” Pickett says. “I had to psyche myself up to go through it all again.”

Her doctor recommended oophorectomy — surgery to remove her ovaries — where most of the estrogen in the body is made. Because estrogen makes hormone-receptor-positive breast cancers grow, reducing the amount of estrogen in the body or blocking its action can help shrink the hormone-receptor-positive cancers. Eight weeks post-op and Pickett was on the

PASSING THE TORCH: During treatment for her third bout of breast cancer, Pickett ran three races and carried the Olympic Torch

for the 2002 Salt Lake City games.

Page 77: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Remember...

To get your mammogram.Visit medline.com

Pink merchandise from Medline helps support the National Breast Cancer Foundation.

Page 78: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

78 The OR Connection

“Running was my coping mechanism,” says Pickett. “It was something that I could actually control during my cancer treatment.”

THE HEAT IS ON: By 2004, Pickett completed her one-hundredth race and was named one of eight running “Heroes” for 2004 by Runner’s World magazine. To date, she has run in 44 states, in 136 races alongside more than two million participants, including 200,000 survivors.

road again, running for her life. She ran ten races in ten weeks, winning the survivor division eight times.

“Running was my coping mechanism,” says Pickett. “It was something that I could actually control during my cancer treatment.”

But there were more hurdles. In August 2001, Pickett had a second recurrence of the disease. She found a lump during a self examination and it was on the same side. The cancer came back again.

“This time it felt different,” says Pickett. “I was not as emotionally distraught because deep down I knew it could happen again. I really felt like kicking it.”

Pickett had surgery to remove the lymph node and six rounds of chemo. While in treatment, she ran three races and carried the Olympic Torch for the 2002 Salt Lake City games.

By 2004, Pickett completed her one-hundredth race and was named one of eight running “Heroes” for 2004 by Runner’s

World magazine. To date, she has run in 44 states, in 136 races alongside more than two million participants, including 200,000 survivors. Her goal is to run in all 50 states.

“I am fortunate in that I feel strong and well enough to train and run races with other survivors so that I may spread my message to women with or without cancer,” says Pickett. “Medical research has made great strides in cancer therapy, which is allowing me to make great strides in my races and my life. Every time I cross a finish line, I’m declaring that life after breast cancer is not just about surviving, but also about thriving. It’s saying publicly to women everywhere that they can literally take steps to make their dreams come true.”

Now a 10-year survivor, Pickett is teaching physical education and coaching track at a middle school in Sacramento. She says her life experience has enhanced the way she teaches.

“I tell my students to have strength and courage and hope – no matter what,” says Judy. “I want them – and every young person out there to know – it is okay to question and persist. Be an advocate for your own health. It’s been 15 years since I was diagnosed and I’m still here. The longer I go cancer-free, the more inspirational I become.”

Pickett’s Pink Ribbon Cancer Fund, which she and Tod started in 1999, has provided more than $72,000 in scholarships to high school seniors in the greater Sacramento are who have an immediate family member with cancer.

ALL IN THE FAMILY: Pickett was 33 and her youngest son, Zach, was just nine months old when she was first diagnosed with breast cancer. When he turned one, she brought him with her to the hospital. “I remember the radiation oncology nurses played with him and took care of him,” said Pickett. “They were great.”

Page 79: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Medline University continues to build its curriculum of Surgical Tech courses, available at www.medlineuniversity.com

Visit today to earn free CE credits with the

following courses:

• #2 on the Joint Commission List - Retained Foreign Objects

• 9 on the Line to Improve Patient Safety

• Applying Evidence-Based Information to Improve Hand-off

• Communication in Perioperative Services

• Safe Medication Practices in Perioperative Practice Setting

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. Medline is a registered trademark of Medline Industries, Inc.

CE Courses for Surgical Techs!

Access courses on your computer, iPhone or iPad.

Just what

I was looking

for.

* Courses are approved for continuing education credit by the Association of Surgical Technologists.

Follow us

Be the first to know when we add new courses and content.

Page 80: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

For the seventh year in a row, Medline hosted a complimentary breast can-cer awareness breakfast on March 26, 2012, in conjunction with the Associa-tion of periOperative Registered Nurses (AORN) Congress in New Orleans, LA. Judy Pickett, a three-time breast cancer survivor and avid runner, shared her per-sonal experience with breast cancer and

how it is possible to not only survive, but thrive.

Since 2006, more than 6,000 nurses have been inspired by the stories of survival shared at the breakfast. Past speakers include actors Jill Eikenberry and Michael Tucker, Olympic gold medal figure skater Peggy Fleming, TV journalist Linda Ellerbee, and actors Rue McClanahan and Ann Jillian.

80 The OR Connection

Medline’s Breast Cancer Awareness Breakfast 2012

AORN 59th CongressMarch 26, 5:30-7:30 a.m.Keynote speaker: Judy Pickett

Grand Ballroom at the Hilton New Orleans

Riverside, Two Poydras Street, New Orleans

Medline’s AORN Breast Cancer Awareness Breakfast Welcomes Judy Pickett

2012

Page 81: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 81

Breakfast Forum at the AORN 58th Congress – Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

2011

Last year, Medline’s 6th annual breakfast, held in conjunction with the AORN 58th Con-gress in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, features Jill Eikenberry, a breast cancer survivor, and her husband Michael Tucker. Eikenberry and Tucker are veteran stage, film and television actors, perhaps best known for their portrayals of Ann Kelsy and Stuart Markowitz on the long-running hit television series L.A. Law.

A look back at previous breakfast forums

Breakfast Forum at the AORN 57th Congress – Denver, Colorado

2010

An audience of more than 1,200 operating room nurses, the largest to date, gathered to hear Olympic gold medalist Peggy Fleming talk about her skating career and battle with breast cancer. She did not disappoint the early morning crowd, who was also treated to a surprise appearance by several other celebrities of sorts – the staff members from Providence St. Vincent Medical Center in Portland, Oregon, who starred in the original “Pink Glove Dance,” a YouTube video sensation that has more than 13.1 million views to date.

Breakfast Forum at the AORN 56th Congress – Chicago, Illinois

2009

One of the funniest, frankest and most distinctive journalists to ever appear on television, keynote speaker Linda Ellerbee touched and inspired the crowd of 1,000 with her candid talk about her treatment and recovery. A 17-year breast cancer survivor, she said she was lucky because her training as a journalist taught her to ask the tough questions.

Photo by Gordon Munro

Page 82: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

82 The OR Connection

Announcing ...

2012 Pink Glove Dance IIVideo Competition Begins

What you can do now to get ready!1. Get consent from your facility2. Gather your friends and coworkers to participate3. Start practicing

Win a Donation to Your Favorite Breast Cancer Charity*• First Place: $10,000• Second Place: $5,000• Third Place: $2,000

Contest opens: July 2Contest closes: September 28Winners announced: November 2

Watch for further details and song choices at www.pinkglovedance.com.

*Subject to review and approval by Medline Industries, Inc.

PGDJuly 2!

Page 83: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 83pinkglovedance.com

Some of last year’s PGD Video contestants!

Gwinnett Medical Center, Duluth, GA

Lexington Medical Center, West Columbia, SC

Highland Hospital, Rochester, NY

San Juan Medical Foundation, Farmington, NM

Victoria Hospital, Prince Albert, SK, Canada

Page 84: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. VasoForce is a trademark and Medline is a registered trademark of Medline Industries, Inc.

Vaso-Force DVT Prophylaxis Quiet, comfortable, convenient care

Innovative and effective DVT prevention

• Excellent patient comfort with soft and breathable garment fabric

• Extra comfort helps promote patient compliance

• Very user-friendly for caregivers with easy-to-use troubleshooting guide clearly marked on machine

• Works quietly to allow patients to rest, does not disturb clinicians

• Both intermittent and sequential pumps availabe

• Available with thigh, calf and foot garments

Page 85: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Ask your Medline representative about “Be Free Day”

At no cost to your facility, Medline will provide a day’s worth of SensiCare surgical gloves as an opportunity to introduce your staff to the newest latex free technology.

©2012 Medline Industries Inc. Isolex is a trademark and Medline and SensiCare are registered trademarks of Medline Industries, Inc.

Advanced Performance and Protection

SENSICARE® Latex-freeSurgical GlovesIsolex™ - SensiCare’s

Breakthrough Technology

Medline’s SensiCare surgical gloves are made from Isolex, a proprietary syntetic polyisoprene. This material has a molecular structure that is virtually identical to natural rubber latex but without the harmful latex proteins. As a result, SensiCare surgical gloves are softer, more elastic and more comfortable than latex to satisfy clinical needs and support safety initiatives.

Page 86: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

86 The OR Connection

Healthy Eating

Ingredients2 tablespoons olive oil1 cup baby carrots1 large onion, coarsely chopped1 medium sweet potato, peeled and cut into 1-inch cubes2 large beet, peeled and cut into 1-inch cubes2 parsnips, peeled and cut into 1-inch cubes¼ cup minced parsleySalt and pepper

Directions:Preheat oven to 500 degrees. Pour oil into large roast pan or jelly roll pan. Place pan into oven until oil is hot, about 1 minute. Add vegetables to hot pan and roast for 20-30 minutes, stirring every 10 minutes until vegetables are golden brown and sweet potato mashes easily when pressed. Season with salt and pepper and garnish with parsley.

Diane Christensen, RN, is a clinical coordinator in the Qual-ity division at Medline’s corporate headquarters in Mundelein, IL. She began learning how to cook at age 8, after her father

Nutrition Information

Servings: 4Calories: 197Fat: 7.2 gSodium: 80 mgFiber: 7.1 g

The Medline employee cookbookis $10. To purchase your own copy, please e-mail Judy at [email protected].

2

passed away and her mother was work-ing long hours. Diane started out helping prepare meals, and before long she was a full-fledged cook.

“I still like cooking, and I am always look-ing for new things to try. Anytime I come across a new recipe, I adjust it to make it my own,” Diane said.

Roasted Vegetables

Page 87: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Forms & Tools

The following pages contain practical tools for implementing patient-focused care practices

at your facility.

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 87

Sharps SafetyOne and Only Campaign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89Sharps Safety Begins with You . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91First Aid for Exposure to Blood and Bodily Fluids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96

Patient Safety20 Tips to Help Prevent Medical Errors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 C. difficileSix Steps to C. diff Prevention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95

Surgical FiresKnow Your Role in Preventing Surgical Fires . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99

Page 88: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Program for Healthcare

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. greensmart is a trademark and Medline is a registered trademark of Medline Industries, Inc.

Measure Your BaselineFrom calculations to benchmarking, your greensmart RoadMAP provides all the tools you need to green your OR, Housekeeping, Laundry, Food Services and Patient Rooms.

1

2

4

3Identify Green Products and StrategiesWith the help of your Program Manager, you will identify products, services and education that are right for your facility.

Receive One-on-one Consultation You will receive personal assistance from your dedicated greensmart Program Manager.

Monitor and PromoteYou are given the tools to not only monitor your progress, but to promote your success.

The greensmart approach for reaching your unique goals:

One-on-one sustainability guidance and services

ONE CALL STARTS YOU ON YOUR WAY TO BECOMING GREENSMART

Francesca Olivier, Medline’s corporate sustainability manager, is ready to work with you no matter where your facility is on your sustainability journey. Call her at (847) 643-3821 or email [email protected]

Page 89: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

For more information, please visit:

www.ONEandONLYcampaign.org

The One & Only Campaign is a public health campaign aimed at raising awareness among the general public and healthcare providers about safe injection practices.

1 needle1 syringe

1 time+ infections0

It’s elementary!

Patients and healthcare providers must both insist on nothing less than One Needle, One Syringe, Only One Time for each and every injection.

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 89

One and Only Campaign Forms & Tools

The greensmart approach for reaching your unique goals:

Page 90: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Arglaes provides:• Antimicrobial protection for up to 7 days • Moist wound healing • Fewer dressing changes • Non-staining • Transparency for wound monitoring

The Arglaes family of products has something for every incision:• Arglaes Film is ideal for managing bacterial penetration on post-op incision and line sites. • Arglaes Island features a calcium alginate pad for fluid management.

ARGLAES® IN THE ORANTIMICROBIAL SILVER TECHNOLOGY

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. Medline is a registered trademark of Medline Industries, Inc. Arglaes is a registered trademark of Giltech Limited Corporation.

Use silver to fight bacteria and surgical site infections

1

2

3

SIGN UP NOW FOR YOUR FREE MEDICLIP TRIAL*

Download a QR Code Reader app

Launch the QR app

Scan this QR Code or visithttp://www.medline.com/true-stories/ac/good-man-campbell-brain-and-spine.asp

Page 91: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Sharps Safety Forms & Tools

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 91

Let’

s ge

t to

the

poi

nt.

Shar

ps S

afet

y be

gins

wit

h yo

u.

BE

PR

EPA

RE

D.A

nti

cipa

te i

nju

ry r

isks

.

Pre

pare

th

e pa

tien

t an

d or

gan

ize

the

wor

k ar

ea w

ith

pre

ven

tion

in

min

d.

BE

AW

AR

E.K

eep

expo

sed

shar

ps i

n v

iew

and

un

der

you

r co

ntr

ol.

Vis

ual

ly

insp

ect

for

unpr

otec

ted

shar

psin

tray

s,

beds

an

d w

aste

rec

epta

cles

.

DIS

PO

SE

WIT

H C

AR

E.B

e re

spon

sib

le f

or

the

shar

ps y

ou u

se.

Act

ivat

e sa

fety

feat

ure

s.D

ispo

sein

shar

psco

nta

iner

s.

ww

w.c

dc.g

ov/s

har

pssa

fety

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

OF

HE

ALT

H A

ND

HU

MA

N S

ER

VIC

ES

CE

NT

ER

S F

OR

DIS

EA

SE

CO

NT

RO

L

AN

D P

RE

VE

NT

ION

SharpsSafety_posterFINAL.qxd 8/8/03 11:13 PM Page 1

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. Medline is a registered trademark of Medline Industries, Inc. Arglaes is a registered trademark of Giltech Limited Corporation.

Page 92: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

20 Tips To Help Prevent Medical Errors

One in seven Medicare patients in hospitalsexperience a medical error. But medical errors canoccur anywhere in the health care system: Inhospitals, clinics, surgery centers, doctors’ offices,nursing homes, pharmacies, and patients’ homes.Errors can involve medicines, surgery, diagnosis,equipment, or lab reports. They can happen duringeven the most routine tasks, such as when a hospitalpatient on a salt-free diet is given a high-salt meal.

Most errors result from problems created by today’scomplex health care system. But errors also happenwhen doctors* and patients have problemscommunicating. These tips tell what you can do toget safer care.

What You Can Do to Stay SafeThe best way you can help to prevent errors is to bean active member of your health care team. Thatmeans taking part in every decision about yourhealth care. Research shows that patients who aremore involved with their care tend to get betterresults.

Medicines 1 Make sure that all of your doctors know about

every medicine you are taking. This includesprescription and over-the-counter medicines anddietary supplements, such as vitamins and herbs.

2 Bring all of your medicines and supplements toyour doctor visits. “Brown bagging” yourmedicines can help you and your doctor talkabout them and find out if there are anyproblems. It can also help your doctor keep yourrecords up to date and help you get betterquality care.

3 Make sure your doctor knows about anyallergies and adverse reactions you have had tomedicines. This can help you to avoid getting amedicine that could harm you.

4 When your doctor writes a prescription for you,make sure you can read it. If you cannot readyour doctor’s handwriting, your pharmacistmight not be able to either.

PATIENTSAFETY

*The term “doctor” is used in this flier to refer to the person who helps you manage your health care.

92 The OR Connection

Forms & Tools Patient Handout - 20 Tips

Page 93: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Patient Handout - 20 Tips Forms & Tools

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 93

2

5 Ask for information about your medicines interms you can understand—both when yourmedicines are prescribed and when you getthem:

What is the medicine for?

How am I supposed to take it and for howlong?

What side effects are likely? What do I do ifthey occur?

Is this medicine safe to take with othermedicines or dietary supplements I amtaking?

What food, drink, or activities should I avoidwhile taking this medicine?

6 When you pick up your medicine from thepharmacy, ask: Is this the medicine that mydoctor prescribed?

7 If you have any questions about the directionson your medicine labels, ask. Medicine labelscan be hard to understand. For example, ask if“four times daily” means taking a dose every 6 hours around the clock or just during regularwaking hours.

8 Ask your pharmacist for the best device tomeasure your liquid medicine. For example,many people use household teaspoons, whichoften do not hold a true teaspoon of liquid.

Special devices, like marked syringes, helppeople measure the right dose.

9 Ask for written information about the sideeffects your medicine could cause. If you knowwhat might happen, you will be better preparedif it does or if something unexpected happens.

Hospital Stays10 If you are in a hospital, consider asking all

health care workers who will touch you whetherthey have washed their hands. Handwashing canprevent the spread of infections in hospitals.

11 When you are being discharged from thehospital, ask your doctor to explain thetreatment plan you will follow at home. Thisincludes learning about your new medicines,making sure you know when to schedulefollow-up appointments, and finding out whenyou can get back to your regular activities.

It is important to know whether or not youshould keep taking the medicines you weretaking before your hospital stay. Getting clearinstructions may help prevent an unexpectedreturn trip to the hospital.

Page 94: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

94 The OR Connection

Forms & Tools Patient Handout - 20 Tips

3

Surgery 12 If you are having surgery, make sure that you,

your doctor, and your surgeon all agree onexactly what will be done.

Having surgery at the wrong site (for example,operating on the left knee instead of the right) israre. But even once is too often. The good newsis that wrong-site surgery is 100 percentpreventable. Surgeons are expected to sign theirinitials directly on the site to be operated onbefore the surgery.

13 If you have a choice, choose a hospital wheremany patients have had the procedure orsurgery you need. Research shows that patientstend to have better results when they are treatedin hospitals that have a great deal of experiencewith their condition.

Other Steps14 Speak up if you have questions or concerns. You

have a right to question anyone who is involvedwith your care.

15 Make sure that someone, such as your primarycare doctor, coordinates your care. This isespecially important if you have many healthproblems or are in the hospital.

16 Make sure that all your doctors have yourimportant health information. Do not assumethat everyone has all the information they need.

17 Ask a family member or friend to go toappointments with you. Even if you do not needhelp now, you might need it later.

18 Know that “more” is not always better. It is agood idea to find out why a test or treatment isneeded and how it can help you. You could bebetter off without it.

19 If you have a test, do not assume that no news isgood news. Ask how and when you will get theresults.

20 Learn about your condition and treatments byasking your doctor and nurse and by using otherreliable sources. For example, treatment optionsbased on the latest scientific evidence areavailable from the Effective Health Care Website (effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/options). Askyour doctor if your treatment is based on thelatest evidence.

Page 95: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

C. diff Prevention Forms & Tools

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 95

Prescribe and use antibiotics carefully. About 50 percent of all antibiotics given are not needed, unnecessarily raising the risk of C. difficile infections.

Test for C. difficile when patients have diarrhea while on anti-biotics or within several months of taking them.

Isolate patients with C. difficile immediately.

Wear gloves and gowns when treating patients with C. difficile even during short visits. Hand sanitizer does not kill C. difficile, and hand washing alone may not be sufficient.

Clean room surfaces with bleach or another EPA-approved, spore-killing disinfectant after a patient with C. difficile has been treated there.

When a patient transfers from one facility to another, notify the new facility if the patient has a C. difficile infection.

6to C. diff Prevention Steps

1

2

3

4

5

6Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/hai/?s_cid=bb-vitalsigns-115

Page 96: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

96 The OR Connection

First Aid for Exposure to Blood and Bodily Fluids

Forms & Tools First Aid

32 WHO best practices for injections and related procedures toolkit

4.3.1 First aid

The first aid given is based on the type of exposure (e.g. splash, needle-stick or other injury) and the means of exposure (e.g. intact skin, nonintact skin) (14, 72). Table 4.1 shows the first aid to apply in different situations.

Table 4.1 First-aid care of the exposure site

Injury or exposure Management

Needle-stick or other sharps injury Immediately wash the affected area with soap and water

Allow injury to bleed freely

Splashofbloodand/orbodyfluidsonnonintactskin

1. Immediately wash the affected area with soap and water

2. DO NOT use disinfectant on skin

3. DO NOT scrub or rub the area

Splashofbloodorbodyfluidstoeyes Flush the area gently but thoroughly with running water or saline for at least 15 minutes while the eyes are open

Keep eyelid gently inverted

Splashofbloodorbodyfluidstomouth or nose 1. Immediatelyspitoutthebloodorfluidsandrinsethe mouth with water several times

2. Blow the nose and clean the affected area with water or saline

3. DO NOT use disinfectant

Splashofbloodand/orbodyfluidson intact skin Immediately wash the affected area with soap and water

DO NOT rub the area

World Health Organization Best Practices for Infections and Related Procedures Toolkit

Page 97: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Medline’s EcoDrape is the only bio-based surgical drape available today. It’s made of more than 96% wood pulp and has all the same great features and performance as other Medline drapes, including hook-and-loop line holders, large reinforcement zones, and premium tape and incise film flush to the fenestration.

Try the new EcoDrape and take your OR to the next level of green!

For a quick online video demonstration,visit www.medline.com/ecodrape

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. Medline is a registered trademark of Medline Industries, Inc. EcoDrape nd greensmart are trademarks of Medline Industries, Inc.

– the first and only bio-based surgical drape

The OR Goes Green

Composition Comparison

EcoDrape SMS

Fibers More than 96% No wood wood pulp pulp

Petrochemical 0% 100% PPingredients (plastics)

Additives Bio-based Fluorine

Download a QR Code Reader app

Launch the QR app

Scan this QR Code or visithttp://www.medline.com/ecodrape/

1

2

3

FOR AN ONLINE VIDEO DEMONSTRATION ABOUT MEDLINE’S ECODRAPE

First Aid for Exposure to Blood and Bodily Fluids

Page 98: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. Medline is a registered trademark and OctylSeal is a trademark of Medline Industries, Inc.

Introducing Medline’s OctylSeal high viscosity tissue adhesive for closure of simple wounds

• Flexible structure moves with the skin, minimizing the chance of cracking• Acts as a barrier to microbial penetration as long as the adhesive film remains intact• 40 percent more glue per container than most other tissue adhesives (0.7 grams versus 0.5 grams)• Easy, versatile application – interchangeable tips (swab and nozzle) included in every package; violet color for easier identification on skin• Metal tube instead of glass ampule means no risk of broken glass entering the wound

Indications for useTopical application only to hold closed easily approximated edges of wounds from surgical incisions, including punc-tures from minimally invasive surgery and simple, thoroughly cleansed trauma-induced lacerations. OctylSeal may be used in conjunction with, but not in place of deep dermal sutures. Available by prescription only.

Stick with OctylSeal™ Flexible wound closure that’s easy on your budget

Download a QR Code Reader app

Launch the QR app

Scan this QR Code or visithttp://www.octylseal.com/

1

2

3

LEARN MORE ABOUT MEDLINE’S OCTYLSEAL HIGH VISCOSITY TISSUE ADHESIVE

Page 99: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Subscribing to The OR Connection guarantees that you’ll continue to receive this magazine and won’t miss out on our industry updates and articles addressing on-the-job issues and patient safety.

We also welcome any suggestions you might have on how we can continue to improve The OR Connection! Love the content? Want to see something new? Just let us know!

To subscribe, simply go to www.medline.com/orconnection. You will need to provide: Your nameFacility and positionMailing address E-mail address

Never miss an issue of The OR Connection!Subscriptions are FREE!

CoverMyrna Chang, DHA, RN, CNORMyrna worked in collaboration with Medline to design an innovative new line of the industry’s first long-sleeved scrubs. The design was a response to AORN and OSHA guidelines, which advise non-scrubbed personnel to wear long sleeves in the OR to prevent skin shedding, which can lead to surgical site infection.

Aligning practice with policy to improve patient care 99

Preventing Surgical Fires Forms & Tools

Source: AORN Fire Safety Tool Kit. Copyright ©AORN, Inc. Denver, CO; 2011. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission.

Page 100: OR Connection Volume 7 Issue 1

Covered Arms Are Compliant Arms

Medline innovation triumphs again.

The latest AORN and OSHA guidelines recommend that OR nurses who aren’t in gowns should wear long sleeves.

PerforMAX scrubs added an inner sleeve to keep arms covered without dangling cuffs—like on jackets—to contaminate sterile fields.

These sleeves are like the finest athletic undergear: cool, supportive and totally breathable. And because they’re PerforMAX, you get a fashionable layered look that’s comfortable and functional all shift long.

©2012 Medline Industries, Inc. PerforMAX and greensmart are trademarks and Medline is a registered trademark of Medline Industries, Inc.

Part of Medline’s

Talk to your facility’s Medline rep or visit Scrubs123.com to find out more about PerforMAX scrubs.

PerforMAX scrubs

line of products.

MKT212065 / LIT1012 / 30M / QG5

WAYS TO EMPOWERYOUR OR

MAYO CLINICCollaboration Communication

TheAligning practice with policy to improve patient care

Myrna ChangInnovative scrub design enhances

patient safety

NaomiJudd Tragic Illness Leads to a Healthcare Safety Crusade

Volume 7, Issue 1

VOLUME 7, ISSUE 1

THE OR CONN

ECTION w

3& Pink Glove

Dance II VideoCompetition!

Page 82

2012