Top Banner
Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins [email protected] AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting, Washington D.C., September 2 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Institute for Systems Research University of Maryland, College Park
20

Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins [email protected] AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

Dec 18, 2015

Download

Documents

Mark Cobb
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs

Nuno C. [email protected]

AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting, Washington D.C., September 29, 2009

Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringInstitute for Systems Research

University of Maryland, College Park

Page 2: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

• Setup is a network whose nodes might comprise of: Linear dynamic systems

Sensors with transmission capabilities

Receivers including state estimator

A Simple Configuration:

Introduction

Page 3: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

• Setup is a network whose nodes might comprise of: Linear dynamic systems

Sensors with transmission capabilities

Receivers including state estimator

A Simple Configuration:

Applications:

-Tracking of stealthy aerial vehicles via (costly) highly encrypted channels.

Introduction

Page 4: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

• Setup is a network whose nodes might comprise of: Linear dynamic systems

Sensors with transmission capabilities

Receivers including state estimator

A Simple Configuration:

Applications:

-Tracking of stealthy aerial vehicles via (costly) highly encrypted channels.

-Distributed learning and control over power limited networks.

NSF CPS: Medium 1.5M

Ant-Like Microrobots - Fast, Small, and Under ControlPI: Martins, Co PIs: Abshire, Smella, Bergbreiter

Introduction

Page 5: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

• Setup is a network whose nodes might comprise of: Linear dynamic systems

Sensors with transmission capabilities

Receivers including state estimator

A Simple Configuration:

Applications:

-Tracking of stealthy aerial vehicles via (costly) highly encrypted channels.

-Distributed learning and control over power limited networks.

- Optimal information sharing in organizations.

Introduction

Page 6: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

• Setup is a network whose nodes might comprise of: Linear dynamic systems

Sensors with transmission capabilities

Receivers including state estimator

A Simple Configuration:

Ultimately, we want to tackle generalinstances of the multi-agent case.

Page 7: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

Major results:Nonlinear, non-convex.Optimality was a long standing open problem.

Solution is provided in:

G. M. Lipsa, N. C. Martins, “Certifying the Optimality of a Distributed State EstimationScheme via Majorization Theory”, submitted to TAC, 2009

Optimal solution:

timeErasure

Transmit

Transmit

A New Method for Certifying Optimality

Page 8: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

Major results:Nonlinear, non-convex.Optimality was a long standing open problem.

Solution is provided in:

G. M. Lipsa, N. C. Martins, “Certifying the Optimality of a Distributed State EstimationScheme via Majorization Theory”, submitted to TAC, 2009

Optimal solution:

timeErasure

Transmit

Transmit

Numerical method to computeOptimal thresholds

A New Method for Certifying Optimality

Page 9: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

Major results:Nonlinear, non-convex.Optimality was a long standing open problem.

Solution is provided in:

G. M. Lipsa, N. C. Martins, “Certifying the Optimality of a Distributed State EstimationScheme via Majorization Theory”, submitted to TAC, 2009

Optimal solution (a modified Kalman F.):

Erasure?yes

no

Execute K.F.

A New Method for Certifying Optimality

Page 10: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

Major results:Nonlinear, non-convex.Optimality was a long standing open problem.

Solution is provided in:

G. M. Lipsa, N. C. Martins, “Certifying the Optimality of a Distributed State EstimationScheme via Majorization Theory”, submitted to TAC, 2009

Past work:

A New Method for Certifying Optimality

Page 11: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

Frigyes Riesz

Issai Schur

Major results:Nonlinear, non-convex.Optimality was a long standing open problem.

Solution is provided in:

G. M. Lipsa, N. C. Martins, “Certifying the Optimality of a Distributed State EstimationScheme via Majorization Theory”, submitted to TAC, 2009

Past work:

Key to our proof is the useof majorization theory.

A New Method for Certifying Optimality

Page 12: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

Tandem Topology

Recent Extensions

Page 13: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

Tandem Topology

OptimalModified K.F.Threshold policy Memoryless forward

Recent Extensions

Page 14: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

Tandem Topology

OptimalModified K.F.Threshold policy Memoryless forward

Control with communication costs (Lipsa, Martins, Allerton’09)

Recent Extensions

Page 15: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

Multiple-stage Gaussian test channel

Problems with Non-Classical Information Structure

Page 16: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

Multiple-stage Gaussian test channel

Lipsa and Martins, CDC’08

Problems with Non-Classical Information Structure

Page 17: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

Major results:Nonlinear, non-convex.Optimality was a long standing open problem.

Solution is provided in:

G. M. Lipsa, N. C. Martins, “Certifying the Optimality of a Distributed State EstimationScheme via Majorization Theory”, submitted to TAC, 2009

Extensions:

Future directions:

-More General Topologies, Including Loops

Summary and Future Work

Page 18: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

Major results:Nonlinear, non-convex.Optimality was a long standing open problem.

Solution is provided in:

G. M. Lipsa, N. C. Martins, “Certifying the Optimality of a Distributed State EstimationScheme via Majorization Theory”, submitted to TAC, 2009

Extensions:

Future directions:

-More General Topologies, Including Loops

-Optimal Distributed Function Agreement with Communication Costs and Partial Information

Summary and Future Work

Page 19: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

Major results:Nonlinear, non-convex.Optimality was a long standing open problem.

Solution is provided in:

G. M. Lipsa, N. C. Martins, “Certifying the Optimality of a Distributed State EstimationScheme via Majorization Theory”, submitted to TAC, 2009

Extensions:

Future directions:

-More General Topologies, Including Loops

-Optimal Distributed Function Agreement with Communication Costs and Partial Information

-Game convergence and performance analysis

Summary and Future Work

Page 20: Optimal Distributed State Estimation and Control, in the Presence of Communication Costs Nuno C. Martins nmartins@umd.edu AFOSR, MURI Kickoff Meeting,

Major results:Nonlinear, non-convex.Optimality was a long standing open problem.

Solution is provided in:

G. M. Lipsa, N. C. Martins, “Certifying the Optimality of a Distributed State EstimationScheme via Majorization Theory”, submitted to TAC, 2009

Extensions:

Future directions:

-More General Topologies, Including Loops

-Optimal Distributed Function Agreement with Communication Costs and Partial Information

-Include Adversarial Action (Game Theoretic Approach)

Summary and Future Work

Thank youThank you