Opportunities for Using Sawmill Residues in Australia Presented by Dean Goble of The Carnot Group Pty Ltd for Forestry and Wood Products Australia 28 August 2013
Opportunities for Using Sawmill Residues in Australia
Presented by Dean Goble of The Carnot Group Pty Ltd for Forestry and Wood Products Australia
28 August 2013
Outline
1. Residues 2. Energy products
a) Electricity b) CHP c) Solid fuels d) Liquid fuels
3. Non-Energy products 4. Government Incentives 5. Comparison of options 6. Summary
Uses for Sawmill
Residues Attributes to be exploited: • Stored chemical energy • Source of hydrocarbons • Mechanical properties
(fibre) • Organic material for
biological feed • Thermal or acoustic
insulation properties
Sawmill residues
Fast Pyrolysis/Indirect Liquefaction
Char
Bio-oils• Fuel oil• Diesel additive
Syngas
Direct Combustion (in boiler)
Steam
Combustion in IC engine
Combustion in gas turbine
Agrichar
Activated carbon
Chemical &/or mechanical pulping
Blend with nitrogen compounds
Hydrolysis and separation
Steam turbine
GeneratorElectricity
F-T Conversion
Bio-fuels• Petrol additive• Diesel additive• Synthetic NG• Hydrogen• Ethanol
Chemical/physical processing
Chemical products
• Specialty chemicals• Commodity chemicals• Resins• Herbicides• Pesticides• Food Flavourings
Compost
Form withresin, polymer or
other binder Engineered wood products
Press with binding agent
Press with binding agent
Charcoal briquettes
Heat treatment
Carbonisation
Pulp for paper & cardboard
Wood pellets or briquettes
Absorbent/ insulating base
for animal bedding
Other Synthesis Processes
Saccharides
Platform chemicals
• Levulinic Acid/ MTHF
• Furfural• Lignin
Fermentation
Chemical processing
Direct Liquefaction
Steam engine
Fuel cell
Pyrolysis/ Carbonisation
Gasification
Conventional residue uses
Process
Potential Revenue Product
Product
Key
Residue characteristics
Bark – 6 %
Sawdust – 7%
Shavings – 5%
Woodchips – 35%
Hardwood Fuel moisture content (wet basis)
HHV, Higher Heating Value
LHV, Lower Heating Value
(MJ/kg) (MJ/kg) 0% 19 19
10% 17.1 16.8 20% 15.2 14.7 30% 13.3 12.5 40% 11.4 10.4 50% 9.5 8.2
Energy Products
• Heating • Electricity • CHP • Fuels
– Solid (pellets, briquettes, charcoal) – liquid (bio-oil, ethanol, methanol, diesel, DME) – Gas (syngas, hydrogen, SNG)
Electricity
• Steam turbine – established, widely available, robust technology – Steam turbine systems generally feasible >5-10MWe – Can be $5-6m/MWe fully installed – Generation cost around $40/MWh not including cost of capital
• Reciprocating steam engine – Limited availability (Spilling) up to 2,000kWe – Big River Timbers (NSW)
• 430kWe capacity • Integrated into steam circuit for kilns
Sawmill residues
Direct Combustion (in boiler)
Steam Steam turbine
GeneratorElectricity
Steam engine
Electricity
• ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) – Organic fluid used in place of steam – Efficient at lower T (waste heat or co-gen)
• ORC installed at Gympie Timber Co – 240kWe capacity – using 150degC thermal oil – waste heat from kilns
• ORC at Reid Bros (Victoria) – Excess steam from kilns – gT Energy Technologies under BOO arrangement
Sawmill residues
Direct Combustion (in boiler)
Steam Steam turbine
GeneratorElectricity
Steam engine
Electricity
• Gasification – Systems in Europe, USA & India (Repotec, Ankur, Andritz, CPC, ZeroPoint Clean Tech) – Gas clean-up main challenge
• Reciprocating gas engine – GE Jenbacher engine (1-2MWe) tested widely over 10yrs – Performance guarantee with tight gas specification
• Microturbine – 100kWe (Ekogen, Finland)
• Fuel cell with syngas under development (very high efficiency) • IGCC for higher efficiency (only large scale)
Sawmill residues
Syngas
Combustion in IC engine
Combustion in gas turbine
GeneratorElectricity
Fuel cellGasification
Electricity – Efficiency
• At small scale: – Gasification and IC engine
(5-15%) – Steam engine (10-15%) – ORC
• At larger scale – Steam turbine (15-25%)
• Large scale – IGCC (22-37%)
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000
Annual residue quantity (Tonne/yr)
Average electrical
output (MWe)
35%
15%
25%
30%
10%
20%
Average electrical output for various conversion efficiencies from hardwood residue with gross heating value of 14MJ/kg (~25%
moisture content wet basis). The green band represents the likely conversion efficiency for a given system capacity.
Electricity – Use
• On-site use – Higher ‘price’ – Cyclic demand
• Low utilisation of installed capacity • Low efficiency – reciprocating engines more level
than turbines
• Sale of Power – Lower price – Grid connection complex, costly and lengthy – Grid interconnect system required
Cogeneration
• Combined heat and power (CHP) – Or Tri-generation (CHCP)
• Europe deployed widely – Steam turbine at larger scale (>5-10MWe) – Recip IC engine and/or ORC at smaller scale
• Key challenge to balance demand – Cyclic or variable demand – Temperature, transfer medium, distance
Co-firing
• Simultaneous combustion of dissimilar fuels • Large kilns or utility boilers
– Coal replacement for reduced emissions (CO2, SOx, etc)
– Disposal of seasonal residues – Base load renewable power
with existing infrastructure and large scale efficiencies
Pellets • Feedstock
– >25,000tpa – Dry (<7% moisture) – Sawdust (<3mm)
• Pressed through die • Comparable energy content to
coal, with low NOx & Sox • Consistent fuel
– AS/NZS 4014.6 – US and European standards
Pellets • Market
– $100-350/t delivered to EU
– Australian market very limited
– Asian market potential
Plant Capacity Main machinery supplier
Material Status
Plantation Energy Australia (Albury WA)
250,000 t/y
Kahl Plantation residues
Shut down, Jan 2012
Pellets Heaters Australia (Woodburn NSW)
3000 t/y Ace press by Andritz
Plantation softwood
Start up phase
East Coast Woodshavings (Gatton Qld)
3000 t/y Ace press by Andritz
Wood fines and sawdust
Operating making kitty litter
Scottsdale Hop Growers (Scottsdale Tas)
3000 t/y Ace press by Andritz
Plantation pine residues
Presently not operating, awaiting dryer installation
South Eastern Fibre Exporters (Eden, NSW)
500 kg/h AGICO (agent Arttech, Rosedale, Qld
Hard and softwood fines from chips
Producing pellets using hardwood & softwood
Altus Renewables
125,000 t/y
Andritz LM26,
Folk Fabrication (US)
Softwood sawdust & shavings
Plant to be commissioned in Jan 2013
Australian New Energy
10,000t/y Chinese Wood waste eg sawdust &shavings
Start up phase
Thermal decomposition
• Char – Reductant – Absorbent – Fuel – Soil improver – Sequestrant
Mode Conditions Bio-oil Char Syngas Gasification (>800oC)
high temperature, long residence times 5% 10% 85%
Fast pyrolysis/ indirect liquefaction (600oC)
moderate temperature, short residence time particularly for vapours
75% 12% 13%
Pyrolysis/ Carbonisation (300-550oC)
low temperature, very long residence time 30% 35% 35%
• Syngas – CO, H2, CH4
– CO2, N2
– Fuel – Chemical
feedstock
• Bio-oil – Fuel (blended
or further refined)
– Chemical feedstock
Bio-oil
Weight/Volume basis Energy Basis
Bio-Oil Production Costs Feedstock 13.30 $/tonne 0.76 $/GJ Manufacturing 76.65 $/tonne 4.38 $/GJ Transport (rail transport to nearest port) 19.25 $/tonne 1.10 $/GJ
Total 109.20 0.13
$/tonne $/litre 6.24 $/GJ
Fuel oil Prices Spot price for gas-oil in Singapore 0.82 $/litre 17.00 $/GJ Spot price for No. 2 diesel in Singapore 0.80 $/litre 25.00 $/GJ
Char Production Costs Feedstock 2.63 $/tonne 0.15 $/GJ Manufacturing 4.90 $/tonne 0.28 $/GJ Transport 11.20 $/tonne 0.64 $/GJ
Total 18.73 $/tonne 1.07 $/GJ
• Synthetic crude oil that can be used as fuel or as source of useful chemicals
• Char co-product option • Production cost claims $3-7/GJ ($50-110/tonne)
Bio-oil plants • KiOR (Mississippi)
– 500 bone dry tpd(pine) – output 50million litres per year of bio-fuels – construction completed 2012 for US$213m – Includes hydrotreating to upgrade oil into fuels or
fuel blendstocks
• Dynamotive (Ontario)
– 200 dry tpd (C&D waste) – Operational since 2007
• Licella (NSW) – Uses novel catalytic hydro-thermal process – Demonstration plant operating 3 years – Feasibility study for pre-commercial 150 dry tpd
plant underway
Bio-ethanol • Hydrolysis route
– Builds on first generation ethanol technology, infrastructure and route to market – Co-products from lignin – chemicals, fuels, etc – Combined saccharification and fermentation possible – Other products from sugars also possible – Bio-butanol as alternative fuel
• Higher energy density • Higher blending ratios
– Conversion efficiencies and enzyme cost main challenges
• Gasification route – F-T route used for decades (WWII Germany, SASOL from coal/NG) – Other synthetic fuels under development – BIO-SNG, Bio-hydrogen, Bio-methanol, Bio-
DME – Gasification control and gas clean-up main challenges
Bio-ethanol
• “Commercial” scale ~100ML/y
Owner Capacity Million litres per
year
Feedstock Hydrolysis Technology Launch
Fiberight, USA (Iowa) 23 MSW Enzyme 2013 Mascoma, USA (Michigan) 76 Woody Biomass CBP 2013 BP Biofuels, USA (Florida) 136 Sugarcane Bagasse Enzyme 2013 Poet-DSM, USA (Iowa) 95 Corn stover Enzyme 2013 DuPont, USA (Iowa) 95 Corn stover Enzyme 2013 Abengoa, USA (Kansas) 95 Corn stover 2013 Petrobras, Brazil 15 Sugarcane Bagasse Enzyme 2013 Abengoa, France 49 Agricultural residue 2013 Inbicon, Denmark 5 Wheat straw Enzyme 2009 M&G – Chemtex, Italy 49 Energy crops Enzyme 2012 Cofco/Sinopec, China 57 Corn stover Enzyme 2013 American Process, USA (Michigan) 3.4 Wood hydrozylate
(hemicellulose) residue from panel board process
Enzyme 2012
INEOS Bio, USA (Florida) 30 MSW and Agricultural waste Gasification 2012
ZeaChem, USA (Oregon) 1 Wood and wheat straw Biochemical & Thermochemical
2012
Fuel product comparison
Biomass product
Typical moisture
content (wet basis)
Net Calorific Value, wet basis (LHV)
Typical bulk density
Gross Energy density (bulk volume basis,
HHV)
% MJ/kg kg/m3 GJ/m3 Hardwood (Eucalypt)
Kiln dried shavings 12 17.6 120 2 Sawdust – green 30 14 180-200 3
Woodchips – air dried 128 30 16
300 4
Solid wood – green 50 8 1150 15 Softwood (P. radiata)
Kiln dried shavings 10 18 135 3 Solid wood – green 50 8 1000 9
Compressed wood Wood pellets 8-10 18 650 12 Charcoal briquettes 5 28-30 1100 31-33 Wood Briquettes 6 19 600-700 12-13
Char - 30 200-250 6-8 Bio-oil 20 17 1200 20 Bio-fuels
Syngas - 5.7
- (12-18MJ/Nm3)
Hydrogen - 142 - (14MJ/Nm3) Ethanol - 30 790 24
Fossil fuels Brown coal (VIC) 65 9 860 8 Black coal (NSW) 8 25 940 23 Fuel Oil - 43 845 36 Diesel - - 850 40 Petrol - - 737 35 Natural gas - - - (36MJ/Nm3)
Fuel Products
• Limited established market in Australia for compressed solid fuels and bio-oil
• Ethanol production technology nearly commercial, although not with wood waste initially
Product
Indicative Production
costs $/GJ
Market value $/GJ
Typical scale and CAPEX
Compressed solid fuels
$6-8 ($120-
160/tonne)
Up to $10 (in Europe $200/tonne)
• Scale: plants available with capacity 0.25 - 20t/hr • Capital cost: $1-1.5million per t/hr
Bio-oil $3-6 $4-15 to displace NG for heating
$10-20 if blended with diesel
• Scale: initial commercial plant 500t/day (~165,000 dry tpy)
• CAPEX: $222m with fuel upgrading (KiOR)
Ethanol $20 ($0.47 per
litre)
$25 ($0.60 per litre)
• Scale: 76 million litres per year ethanol output (Mascoma - under construction)
• CAPEX: $1.77/litre/year
Non-Energy Products
• Chemicals – Food flavourings (used now) – Resins, platform chemicals, herbicides, pesticides
• Agrichar • Conventional residue uses
– Engineered wood products – Compost – Pulp & paper – Insulation (eg animal bedding)
Agri-Char
• Pyrolysis product dictated by – Feedstock, process parameters, standards
• Uses – char characteristics – Soil-enhancer
• Positive initial findings and significant potential but insufficient current knowledge
– Carbon sequestration • stability timescales under investigation
• Niche producers only ~$1000-2000/t*
* These products contain other nutrients
Chemicals
• Other non-commercial products – Phenolic resins for wood industry to replace fossil phenol
• >3 million tpy market • Challenges relate to quality and cost
– Platform chemicals such as Levulinic Acid, Furfural, Lignin
– Pesticides/herbicides – Specialty and commodity chemicals
Pre-treatment
– Required for many of opportunities discussed – Drying
• Solar or air drying – time, space and increased stock • Forced drying energy intensive, requires plant
– Size reduction
Product Equipment Max particle size after reduction
(mm)
Grind energy (MJe/tonne)
Barley straws, corn stover, switch grass Hammer mill 3.2 40 Barley straws, corn stover, switch grass Hammer mill 0.8 100 Poplar chips (10-15% mc) Hammer mill 1.0 432 Pine chips (10-15% mc) Hammer mill 1.0 540 Pine bark (10-15% mc) Hammer mill 1.0 126 Aspen wood Hammer mill 3.0 200 Unspecified wood Attrition mill 0.9 940 Unspecified wood Attrition mill 0.1 2,360
Government Incentive Schemes
• Federal – ARENA (Australian Renewable Energy Agency) statutory
authority with $3.2b guaranteed funding to 2020 – Grants, Venture Capital, Targets, Advice, Accreditation – Carbon Trading
• State – Many programs reduced or ended due to federal schemes – Smaller targeted grants, loans, targets, support
• Generally – Programs are transient or changeable – Not for residues from old growth forest – Can reduce risk or improve viable projects
Value Matrix • Generally the best
opportunities are pellets or heat and electricity (dependent on scale and other factors)
• Higher value products are not ready commercially
Economic Benefit Low High
Tech
nolo
gy R
eadi
ness
Low
High
Pellets Briquettes
Agri-char
Heat
Electricity CHP
Bio-oil
Bio-fuels
Chemical products Platform
chemicals
Food Flavouring
Summary • Main process options
– Combustion: using the heat, via a heat transfer medium, for power generation and heating
– Gasification: using the cleaned syngas to fuel an engine for power generation or to produce bio-fuels
– Pyrolysis: to produce char products or bio-oil or bio-fuels – Pelletising: a dense fuel for domestic heating and fuelling small scale
power plant – Hydrolysis and fermentation: production of ethanol or butanol – Various combined thermal and chemical processes: production of
chemicals
• Key opportunities – Pellet technology available but mainly reliant on export market – Heat and power options available and becoming more financially
viable – higher efficiency at larger scale, tailored solution is key – Higher value product technologies not commercially ready, likely suit
large scale