4 - 1 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 Forecasting PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and Render Operations Management, 10e Principles of Operations Management, 8e PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
1/114
4 - 1 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
4 Forecasting
PowerPoint presentation to accompanyHeizer and RenderOperations Management, 10ePrinciples of Operations Management, 8e
PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
2/114
4 - 2 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Outl ine
Global Company Profile: DisneyWorld
What Is Forecasting?
Forecasting Time Horizons
The Influence of Product Life Cycle
Types Of Forecasts
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
3/114
4 - 3 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Outl ine Con t inued
The Strategic Importance ofForecasting
Human Resources
Capacity
Supply Chain Management
Seven Steps in the ForecastingSystem
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
4/114
4 - 4 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Outl ine Con t inued
Forecasting Approaches
Overview of Qualitative Methods
Overview of Quantitative Methods
Time-Series Forecasting
Decomposition of a Time Series
Naive Approach
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
5/114
4 - 5 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Outl ine Con t inued
Time-Series Forecasting (cont.)
Moving Averages
Exponential Smoothing
Exponential Smoothing with TrendAdjustment
Trend Projections
Seasonal Variations in Data
Cyclical Variations in Data
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
6/114
4 - 6 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Outl ine Con t inued
Associative Forecasting Methods:Regression and CorrelationAnalysis
Using Regression Analysis forForecasting
Standard Error of the Estimate
Correlation Coefficients forRegression Lines
Multiple-Regression Analysis
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
7/1144 - 7 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Outl ine Con t inued
Monitoring and ControllingForecasts
Adaptive Smoothing
Focus Forecasting
Forecasting in the Service Sector
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
8/1144 - 8 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Learn ing Object ives
When you complete this chapter youshould be able to :
1. Understand the three time horizonsand which models apply for each use
2. Explain when to use each of the fourqualitative models
3. Apply the naive, moving average,exponential smoothing, and trendmethods
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
9/1144 - 9 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Learn ing Object ives
When you complete this chapter youshould be able to :
4. Compute three measures of forecastaccuracy
5. Develop seasonal indexes
6. Conduct a regression and correlationanalysis
7. Use a tracking signal
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
10/1144 - 10 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Forecast ing at Disney World
Global portfolio includes parks in HongKong, Paris, Tokyo, Orlando, andAnaheim
Revenues are derived from peoplehowmany visitors and how they spend theirmoney
Daily management report contains onlythe forecast and actual attendance ateach park
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
11/1144 - 11 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Forecast ing at Disney World
Disney generates daily, weekly, monthly,annual, and 5-year forecasts
Forecast used by labor management,maintenance, operations, finance, andpark scheduling
Forecast used to adjust opening times,
rides, shows, staffing levels, and guestsadmitted
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
12/114
4 - 12 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Forecast ing at Disney World
20% of customers come from outside theUSA
Economic model includes grossdomestic product, cross-exchange rates,arrivals into the USA
A staff of 35 analysts and 70 field people
survey 1 million park guests, employees,and travel professionals each year
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
13/114
4 - 13 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Forecast ing at Disney World
Inputs to the forecasting model includeairline specials, Federal Reservepolicies, Wall Street trends,
vacation/holiday schedules for 3,000school districts around the world
Average forecast error for the 5-yearforecast is 5%
Average forecast error for annualforecasts is between 0% and 3%
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
14/114
4 - 14 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
What is Forecast ing?
Process of predictinga future event
Underlying basis
of all businessdecisions
Production
Inventory
Personnel
Facilities
??
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
15/114
4 - 15 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Short-range forecast Up to 1 year, generally less than 3 months
Purchasing, job scheduling, workforcelevels, job assignments, production levels
Medium-range forecast 3 months to 3 years
Sales and production planning, budgeting
Long-range forecast 3+years
New product planning, facility location,research and development
Forecast ing Time Horizons
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
16/114
4 - 16 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Dist ingu ish ing Dif ferences
Medium/long rangeforecasts deal withmore comprehensive issues and supportmanagement decisions regarding
planning and products, plants andprocesses
Short-termforecasting usually employsdifferent methodologies than longer-term
forecasting Short-termforecasts tend to be more
accurate than longer-term forecasts
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
17/114
4 - 17 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
In f luence of Product L i fe
Cycle
Introduction and growth require longerforecasts than maturity and decline
As product passes through life cycle,forecasts are useful in projecting
Staffing levels
Inventory levels
Factory capacity
IntroductionGrowthMaturityDecline
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
18/114
4 - 18 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product L i fe Cycle
Best period toincrease marketshare
R&D engineering iscritical
Practical to changeprice or qualityimage
Strengthen niche
Poor time tochange image,price, or quality
Competitive costsbecome criticalDefend marketposition
Cost controlcritical
Introduction Growth Maturity Decline
Com
panyStrateg
y/Issues
Figure 2.5
Internet search engines
Sales
Drive-throughrestaurants
CD-ROMs
AnalogTVs
iPods
Boeing 787
LCD &plasma TVs
Avatars
Xbox 360
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
19/114
4 - 19 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product L i fe Cycle
Product designanddevelopmentcritical
Frequent
product andprocess designchanges
Short productionruns
High productioncosts
Limited models
Attention toquality
Introduction Growth Maturity Decline
O
MS
trategy/Is
sues
Forecastingcritical
Product andprocessreliability
Competitiveproductimprovementsand options
Increase capacity
Shift towardproduct focus
Enhancedistribution
Standardization
Fewer productchanges, moreminor changes
Optimum
capacityIncreasingstability ofprocess
Long productionruns
Productimprovementand cost cutting
Little productdifferentiation
Costminimization
Overcapacity
in theindustry
Prune line toeliminateitems notreturninggood margin
Reducecapacity
Figure 2.5
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
20/114
4 - 20 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Types o f Forecasts
Economic forecasts
Address business cycleinflation rate,money supply, housing starts, etc.
Technological forecasts
Predict rate of technological progress
Impacts development of new products
Demand forecasts Predict sales of existing products and
services
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
21/114
4 - 21 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Strateg ic Importance of
Forecast ing
Human ResourcesHiring, training,laying off workers
CapacityCapacity shortages canresult in undependable delivery, lossof customers, loss of market share
Supply Chain ManagementGoodsupplier relations and priceadvantages
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
22/114
4 - 22 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Seven Steps in Forecast ing
1. Determine the use of the forecast2. Select the items to be forecasted
3. Determine the time horizon of the
forecast4. Select the forecasting model(s)
5. Gather the data
6. Make the forecast
7. Validate and implement results
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
23/114
4 - 23 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Realit ies!
Forecasts are seldom perfect
Most techniques assume anunderlying stability in the system
Product family and aggregatedforecasts are more accurate than
individual product forecasts
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
24/114
4 - 24 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Forecast ing App roaches
Used when situation is vague
and little data exist New products
New technology
Involves intuition, experience e.g., forecasting sales on
Internet
Qualitative Methods
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
25/114
4 - 25 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Forecast ing App roaches
Used when situation is stable and
historical data exist Existing products
Current technology
Involves mathematical techniques e.g., forecasting sales of color
televisions
Quantitative Methods
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
26/114
4 - 26 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Overview o f Qual i tat ive
Methods1. Jury of executive opinion
Pool opinions of high-level experts,sometimes augment by statisticalmodels
2. Delphi method
Panel of experts, queried iteratively
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
27/114
4 - 27 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Overview o f Qual i tat ive
Methods3. Sales force composite
Estimates from individualsalespersons are reviewed forreasonableness, then aggregated
4. Consumer Market Survey
Ask the customer
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
28/114
4 - 28 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Involves small group of high-levelexperts and managers
Group estimates demand by working
together Combines managerial experience with
statistical models
Relatively quick
Group-thinkdisadvantage
Ju ry o f Execu t ive Opinion
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
29/114
4 - 29 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Sales Force Composi te
Each salesperson projects his orher sales
Combined at district and nationallevels
Sales reps know customers wants
Tends to be overly optimistic
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
30/114
4 - 30 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Delph i Method
Iterative groupprocess,continues untilconsensus is
reached
3 types ofparticipants
Decision makers
Staff
Respondents
Staff(Administering
survey)
Decision Makers(Evaluate
responses andmake decisions)
Respondents(People who canmake valuable
judgments)
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
31/114
4 - 31 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Consumer Market Survey
Ask customers about purchasingplans
What consumers say, and whatthey actually do are often different
Sometimes difficult to answer
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
32/114
4 - 32 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Overview of Quanti tative
Approaches1. Naive approach
2. Moving averages
3. Exponentialsmoothing
4. Trend projection5. Linear regression
time-seriesmodels
associativemodel
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
33/114
4 - 33 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Set of evenly spaced numerical data
Obtained by observing response
variable at regular time periods Forecast based only on past values,
no other variables important
Assumes that factors influencingpast and present will continueinfluence in future
Time Series Forecast ing
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
34/114
4 - 34 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Trend
Seasonal
Cyclical
Random
Time Series Componen ts
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
35/114
4 - 35 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Components of Demand
Deman
dforproductor
service
| | | |1 2 3 4
Time (years)
Average demandover 4 years
Trendcomponent
Actual demandline
Random variation
Figure 4.1
Seasonal peaks
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
36/114
4 - 36 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Persistent, overall upward ordownward pattern
Changes due to population,technology, age, culture, etc.
Typically several yearsduration
Trend Component
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
37/114
4 - 37 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Regular pattern of up anddown fluctuations
Due to weather, customs, etc.
Occurs within a single year
Seasonal Component
Number ofPeriod Length Seasons
Week Day 7Month Week 4-4.5Month Day 28-31
Year Quarter 4Year Month 12Year Week 52
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
38/114
4 - 38 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Repeating up and down movements
Affected by business cycle,political, and economic factors
Multiple years duration
Often causal or
associativerelationships
Cyc l ical Component
0 5 10 15 20
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
39/114
4 - 39 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Erratic, unsystematic, residualfluctuations
Due to random variation or unforeseenevents
Short durationand nonrepeating
Random Component
M T W T F
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
40/114
4 - 40 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Naive Approach
Assumes demand in nextperiod is the same asdemand in most recent period
e.g., If January sales were 68, thenFebruary sales will be 68
Sometimes cost effective and
efficient Can be good starting point
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
41/114
4 - 41 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
MA is a series of arithmetic means
Used if little or no trend
Used often for smoothing
Provides overall impression of dataover time
Mov ing Average Method
Moving average =demand in previous nperiods
n
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
42/114
4 - 42 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
January 10
February 12March 13April 16May 19
June 23July 26
Actual 3-MonthMonth Shed Sales Moving Average
(12 + 13 + 16)/3 = 13 2/3
(13 + 16 + 19)/3 = 16(16 + 19 + 23)/3 = 19 1/3
Mov ing Average Examp le
10
1213
(10+ 12+ 13)/3 = 11 2/3
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
43/114
4 - 43 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Graph o f Moving Average
| | | | | | | | | | | |
J F M A M J J A S O N D
ShedSales
30
28
26
24 22
20
18
16
14
12
10
ActualSales
MovingAverageForecast
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
44/114
4 - 44 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Used when some trend might bepresent
Older data usually less important
Weights based on experience andintuition
Weigh ted Mov ing Average
Weightedmoving average =
(weight for period n)
x (demand in period n)
weights
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
45/114
4 - 45 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
January 10February 12March 13
April 16May 19June 23July 26
Actual 3-Month Weighted
Month Shed Sales Moving Average
[(3 x 16) + (2 x 13) + (12)]/6 = 141/3[(3 x 19) + (2 x 16) + (13)]/6 = 17[(3 x 23) + (2 x 19) + (16)]/6 = 201/2
Weigh ted Mov ing Average
101213
[(3 x 13) + (2 x 12) + (10)]/6 = 121
/6
Weights Applied Period
3 Last month2 Two months ago1 Three months ago
6 Sum of weights
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
46/114
4 - 46 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Increasing nsmooths the forecastbut makes it less sensitive to
changes
Do not forecast trends well
Require extensive historical data
Poten t ial Prob lems With
Moving Average
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
47/114
4 - 47 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Moving Average AndWeigh ted Mov ing Average
30
25
20
15
10
5
Salesdeman
d
| | | | | | | | | | | |
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Actualsales
Movingaverage
Weightedmovingaverage
Figure 4.2
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
48/114
4 - 48 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Form of weighted moving average
Weights decline exponentially
Most recent data weighted most
Requires smoothing constant (
)
Ranges from 0 to 1
Subjectively chosen Involves little record keeping of past
data
Exponent ial Smoo thing
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
49/114
4 - 49 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponent ial Smoo thing
New forecast = Last periods forecast+ (Last periods actual demand
Last periods forecast)
Ft= Ft1+ (A t1- Ft1)
where Ft= new forecast
Ft1= previous forecast= smoothing (or weighting)
constant (0 1)
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
50/114
4 - 50 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponent ial Smoo thing
ExamplePredicted demand = 142 Ford MustangsActual demand = 153
Smoothing constant = .20
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
51/114
4 - 51 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponent ial Smoo thing
ExamplePredicted demand = 142 Ford MustangsActual demand = 153
Smoothing constant = .20
New forecast = 142 + .2(153142)
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
52/114
4 - 52 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponent ial Smoo thing
ExamplePredicted demand = 142 Ford MustangsActual demand = 153
Smoothing constant = .20
New forecast = 142 + .2(153142)
= 142 + 2.2= 144.2 144 cars
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
53/114
4 - 53 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Effect o f
Smoo th ing Constants
Weight Assigned to
Most 2nd Most 3rd Most 4th Most 5th MostRecent Recent Recent Recent RecentSmoothing Period Period Period Period PeriodConstant (
)
(1 -
)
(1 -
)2
(1 -
)3
(1 -
)4
= .1 .1 .09 .081 .073 .066
= .5 .5 .25 .125 .063 .031
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
54/114
4 - 54 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Impact o f Dif feren t
225
200
175
150 | | | | | | | | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Quarter
Demand
= .1
Actualdemand
= .5
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
55/114
4 - 55 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Impact o f Dif feren t
225
200
175
150 | | | | | | | | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Quarter
Demand
= .1
Actualdemand
= .5 Chose high values of
when underlying averageis likely to change
Choose low values of when underlying averageis stable
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
56/114
4 - 56 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Choos ing
The objective is to obtain the mostaccurate forecast no matter thetechnique
We generally do this by selecting themodel that gives us the lowest forecasterror
Forecast error = Actual demand - Forecast value
= A t- Ft
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
57/114
4 - 57 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Common Measu res o f Error
Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD)
MAD =
|Actual - Forecast|
n
Mean Squared Error (MSE)
MSE =(Forecast Errors)2
n
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
58/114
4 - 58 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Common Measu res o f Error
Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE)
MAPE =100|Actuali- Forecasti|/Actuali
n
n
i= 1
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
59/114
4 - 59 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Compar ison o f ForecastError
Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50
1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00
2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.754 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.125 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.566 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78
7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
60/114
4 - 60 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Compar ison o f ForecastError
Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50
1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00
2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.754 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.125 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.566 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78
7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62
MAD =|deviations|
n
= 82.45/8 = 10.31
For = .10
= 98.62/8 = 12.33
For = .50
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
61/114
4 - 61 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Compar ison o f ForecastError
Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50
1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00
2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.754 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.125 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.566 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78
7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62MAD 10.31 12.33
= 1,526.54/8 = 190.82
For = .10
= 1,561.91/8 = 195.24
For = .50
MSE = (forecast errors)2
n
C i f F
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
62/114
4 - 62 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Compar ison o f ForecastError
Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50
1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00
2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.754 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.125 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.566 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78
7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62MAD 10.31 12.33MSE 190.82 195.24
= 44.75/8 = 5.59%
For = .10
= 54.05/8 = 6.76%
For = .50
MAPE = 100|deviationi|/actuali
n
n
i= 1
C i f F t
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
63/114
4 - 63 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Compar ison o f ForecastError
Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50
1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00
2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.754 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.125 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.566 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78
7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62MAD 10.31 12.33MSE 190.82 195.24
MAPE 5.59% 6.76%
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
64/114
4 - 64 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponent ial Smoo thing w i th
Trend Adjus tmentWhen a trend is present, exponentialsmoothing must be modified
Forecastincluding (FITt) =trend
Exponentially Exponentiallysmoothed (Ft) + smoothed (Tt)forecast trend
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
65/114
4 - 65 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponent ial Smoo thing w i th
Trend Adjus tment
Ft= (A t- 1) + (1 - )(Ft- 1+ Tt- 1)
Tt= b(Ft - Ft- 1) + (1 - b)Tt- 1
Step 1: Compute Ft
Step 2: Compute Tt
Step 3: Calculate the forecast FITt= Ft+ Tt
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
66/114
4 - 66 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponent ial Smoo thing w ithTrend Adjustment Example
ForecastActual Smoothed Smoothed Including
Month(t) Demand (A t) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt
1 12 11 2 13.00
2 173 204 195 246 21
7 318 289 36
10
Table 4.1
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
67/114
4 - 67 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponent ial Smoo thing w ithTrend Adjustment Example
ForecastActual Smoothed Smoothed Including
Month(t) Demand (A t) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt
1 12 11 2 13.00
2 173 204 195 246 21
7 318 289 36
10
Table 4.1
F2 = A 1+ (1 - )(F1+ T1)F2 = (.2)(12) + (1 - .2)(11 + 2)
= 2.4 + 10.4 = 12.8 units
Step 1: Forecast for Month 2
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
68/114
4 - 68 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponent ial Smoo thing w ithTrend Adjustment Example
ForecastActual Smoothed Smoothed Including
Month(t) Demand (A t) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt
1 12 11 2 13.00
2 17 12.803 204 195 246 21
7 318 289 36
10
Table 4.1
T2 = b(F2- F1) + (1 - b)T1T2 = (.4)(12.8 - 11) + (1 - .4)(2)
= .72 + 1.2 = 1.92 units
Step 2: Trend for Month 2
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
69/114
4 - 69 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponent ial Smoo thing w ithTrend Adjustment Example
ForecastActual Smoothed Smoothed Including
Month(t) Demand (A t) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt
1 12 11 2 13.00
2 17 12.80 1.923 204 195 246 21
7 318 289 36
10
Table 4.1
FIT2 = F
2+ T
2
FIT2 = 12.8 + 1.92
= 14.72 units
Step 3: Calculate FITfor Month 2
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
70/114
4 - 70 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponent ial Smoo thing w ithTrend Adjustment Example
ForecastActual Smoothed Smoothed Including
Month(t) Demand (A t) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt
1 12 11 2 13.00
2 17 12.80 1.92 14.723 204 195 246 21
7 318 289 36
10
Table 4.1
15.18 2.10 17.2817.82 2.32 20.1419.91 2.23 22.1422.51 2.38 24.89
24.11 2.07 26.1827.14 2.45 29.5929.28 2.32 31.6032.48 2.68 35.16
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
71/114
4 - 71 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponent ial Smoo thing w ithTrend Adjustment Example
Figure 4.3
| | | | | | | | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Time (month)
Productdem
and
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Actual demand (A t)
Forecast including trend (FITt)
with = .2 and b= .4
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
72/114
4 - 72 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Trend Project ions
Fitting a trend line to historical data pointsto project into the medium to long-range
Linear trends can be found using the leastsquares technique
y= a+ bx^
where y = computed value of the variable to
be predicted (dependent variable)a = y-axis interceptb = slope of the regression linex = the independent variable
^
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
73/114
4 - 73 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Least Squares Method
Time period
Value
sofDepende
ntVariable
Figure 4.4
Deviation1
(error)
Deviation5
Deviation7
Deviation2
Deviation6
Deviation4
Deviation3
Actual observation(y-value)
Trend line, y= a+ bx^
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
74/114
4 - 74 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Least Squares Method
Time period
Value
sofDepende
ntVariable
Figure 4.4
Deviation1
(error)
Deviation5
Deviation7
Deviation2
Deviation6
Deviation4
Deviation3
Actual observation(y-value)
Trend line, y= a+ bx^
Least squares methodminimizes the sum of the
squared errors (deviations)
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
75/114
4 - 75 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Least Squares Method
Equations to calculate the regression variables
b =Sxy - nxy
Sx2- nx2
y = a + bx^
a = y - bx
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
76/114
4 - 76 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Least Squares Example
b= = = 10.54xy- nxy
x2- nx2
3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86)
140 - (7)(42)
a= y- bx= 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70
Time Electrical Power
Year Period (x) Demand x2 xy
2003 1 74 1 742004 2 79 4 1582005 3 80 9 2402006 4 90 16 360
2007 5 105 25 5252008 6 142 36 8522009 7 122 49 854
x= 28 y= 692 x2= 140 xy= 3,063x= 4 y= 98.86
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
77/114
4 - 77 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
b= = = 10.54xy- nxy
x2- nx2
3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86)
140 - (7)(42)
a= y- bx= 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70
Time Electrical Power
Year Period (x) Demand x2 xy
2003 1 74 1 742004 2 79 4 1582005 3 80 9 2402006 4 90 16 360
2007 5 105 25 5252008 6 142 36 8522009 7 122 49 854
x= 28 y= 692 x2= 140 xy= 3,063x= 4 y= 98.86
Least Squares Example
The trend line is
y= 56.70 + 10.54x^
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
78/114
4 - 78 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Least Squares Example
| | | | | | | | |2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
160
150
140
130
120 110
100
90
80
70
60
50
Year
Powerdemand
Trend line,y= 56.70 + 10.54x^
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
79/114
4 - 80 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Seasonal Variations In Data
The multiplicative
seasonal modelcan adjust trenddata for seasonalvariations indemand
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
80/114
4 - 81 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Seasonal Variations In Data
1. Find average historical demand for each season
2. Compute the average demand over all seasons
3. Compute a seasonal index for each season
4. Estimate next years total demand
5. Divide this estimate of total demand by the
number of seasons, then multiply it by theseasonal index for that season
Steps in the process:
S
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
81/114
4 - 82 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Seasonal Index Examp le
Jan 80 85 105 90 94
Feb 70 85 85 80 94
Mar 80 93 82 85 94
Apr 90 95 115 100 94May 113 125 131 123 94
Jun 110 115 120 115 94
Jul 100 102 113 105 94
Aug 88 102 110 100 94
Sept 85 90 95 90 94
Oct 77 78 85 80 94
Nov 75 72 83 80 94
Dec 82 78 80 80 94
Demand Average Average SeasonalMonth 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index
S l I d E l
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
82/114
4 - 83 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Seasonal Index Examp le
Jan 80 85 105 90 94
Feb 70 85 85 80 94
Mar 80 93 82 85 94
Apr 90 95 115 100 94May 113 125 131 123 94
Jun 110 115 120 115 94
Jul 100 102 113 105 94
Aug 88 102 110 100 94
Sept 85 90 95 90 94
Oct 77 78 85 80 94
Nov 75 72 83 80 94
Dec 82 78 80 80 94
Demand Average Average SeasonalMonth 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index
0.957
Seasonal index =Average 2007-2009 monthly demand
Average monthly demand
= 90/94 = .957
S l I d E l
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
83/114
4 - 84 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Seasonal Index Examp le
Jan 80 85 105 90 94 0.957
Feb 70 85 85 80 94 0.851
Mar 80 93 82 85 94 0.904
Apr 90 95 115 100 94 1.064May 113 125 131 123 94 1.309
Jun 110 115 120 115 94 1.223
Jul 100 102 113 105 94 1.117
Aug 88 102 110 100 94 1.064
Sept 85 90 95 90 94 0.957
Oct 77 78 85 80 94 0.851
Nov 75 72 83 80 94 0.851
Dec 82 78 80 80 94 0.851
Demand Average Average SeasonalMonth 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index
S l I d E l
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
84/114
4 - 85 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Seasonal Index Examp le
Jan 80 85 105 90 94 0.957
Feb 70 85 85 80 94 0.851
Mar 80 93 82 85 94 0.904
Apr 90 95 115 100 94 1.064May 113 125 131 123 94 1.309
Jun 110 115 120 115 94 1.223
Jul 100 102 113 105 94 1.117
Aug 88 102 110 100 94 1.064
Sept 85 90 95 90 94 0.957
Oct 77 78 85 80 94 0.851
Nov 75 72 83 80 94 0.851
Dec 82 78 80 80 94 0.851
Demand Average Average SeasonalMonth 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index
Expected annual demand = 1,200
Jan x .957 = 961,200
12
Feb x .851 = 851,20012
Forecast for 2010
S l I d E l
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
85/114
4 - 86 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Seasonal Index Examp le
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70 | | | | | | | | | | | |
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Time
Demand
2010 Forecast2009 Demand
2008 Demand
2007 Demand
San Diego Hosp ital
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
86/114
4 - 87 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
San Diego Hosp ital
10,200
10,000
9,800
9,600
9,400
9,200
9,000 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
Month
InpatientDays
9530
9551
9573
9594
9616
9637
9659
9680
9702
9724
97459766
Figure 4.6
Trend Data
San Diego Hosp ital
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
87/114
4 - 88 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
San Diego Hosp ital
1.06
1.04
1.02
1.00
0.98
0.96
0.94
0.92 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
Month
IndexforInpatie
ntDays 1.04
1.021.01
0.99
1.031.04
1.00
0.98
0.97
0.99
0.970.96
Figure 4.7
Seasonal Indices
San Diego Hosp ital
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
88/114
4 - 89 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
San Diego Hosp ital
10,200
10,000
9,800
9,600
9,400
9,200
9,000 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
Month
InpatientDays
Figure 4.8
9911
9265
9764
9520
9691
9411
9949
9724
9542
9355
10068
9572
Combined Trend and Seasonal Forecast
A i t i F t i
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
89/114
4 - 90 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Associat ive Forecast ing
Used when changes in one or moreindependent variables can be used to predict
the changes in the dependent variable
Most common technique is linearregression analysis
We apply this technique just as we didin the time series example
A i t i F t i
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
90/114
4 - 91 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Associat ive Forecast ing
Forecasting an outcome based onpredictor variables using the least squarestechnique
y= a+ bx^
where y = computed value of the variable tobe predicted (dependent variable)
a = y-axis intercept
b = slope of the regression line
x = the independent variable though topredict the value of the dependentvariable
^
Associat ive Forecast ing
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
91/114
4 - 92 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Associat ive Forecast ingExample
Sales Area Payroll($ millions), y ($ billions), x
2.0 13.0 3
2.5 42.0 22.0 13.5 7
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
| | | | | | |0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Sales
Area payroll
Associat ive Forecast ing
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
92/114
4 - 93 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Associat ive Forecast ingExample
Sales, y Payroll, x x2 xy
2.0 1 1 2.03.0 3 9 9.02.5 4 16 10.0
2.0 2 4 4.02.0 1 1 2.03.5 7 49 24.5
y= 15.0 x= 18 x2= 80 xy= 51.5
x= x/6 = 18/6 = 3
y= y/6 = 15/6 = 2.5
b= = = .25xy - nxy
x2- nx2
51.5 - (6)(3)(2.5)80 - (6)(32)
a= y- bx = 2.5 - (.25)(3) = 1.75
Associat ive Forecast ing
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
93/114
4 - 94 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Associat ive Forecast ingExample
y= 1.75 + .25x^ Sales = 1.75 + .25(payroll)
If payroll next year
is estimated to be$6 billion, then:
Sales = 1.75 + .25(6)Sales = $3,250,000
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
| | | | | | |0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
N
odels
sales
Area payroll
3.25
Standard Erro r o f the
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
94/114
4 - 95 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Standard Erro r o f theEst imate
A forecast is just a point estimate of afuture value
This point is
actually themean of aprobabilitydistribution
Figure 4.9
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
| | | | | | |0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
N
odels
sales
Area payroll
3.25
Standard Erro r o f the
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
95/114
4 - 96 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Standard Erro r o f theEst imate
where y = y-value of each data point
yc = computed value of the dependentvariable, from the regressionequation
n = number of data points
Sy,x=(y - yc)
2
n - 2
Standard Erro r o f the
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
96/114
4 - 97 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Standard Erro r o f theEst imate
Computationally, this equation isconsiderably easier to use
We use the standard error to set upprediction intervals around thepoint estimate
Sy,x=y2- ay - bxy
n - 2
Standard Erro r o f the
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
97/114
4 - 98 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Standard Erro r o f theEst imate
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
| | | | | | |0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
No
dels
sales
Area payroll
3.25
Sy,x= =y2- ay - bxy
n - 2
39.5 - 1.75(15) - .25(51.5)
6 - 2
Sy,x= .306
The standard errorof the estimate is
$306,000 in sales
Correlat ion
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
98/114
4 - 99 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
How strong is the linearrelationship between the variables?
Correlation does not necessarily
imply causality!
Coefficient of correlation, r,measures degree of association
Values range from -1 to +1
Correlat ion
C l t i C ff i i t
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
99/114
4 - 100 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Correlat ion Coeff ic ient
r =nSxy- SxSy
[nSx2- (Sx)2][nSy2- (Sy)2]
C l t i C ff i i t
y y
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
100/114
4 - 101 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Correlat ion Coeff ic ient
r =nSxy- SxSy
[nSx2- (Sx)2][nSy2- (Sy)2]
y
x(a) Perfect positivecorrelation:
r= +1
y
x(b) Positivecorrelation:
0 < r< 1
y
x(c) No correlation:r= 0
y
x(d) Perfect negativecorrelation:r= -1
Correlat ion
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
101/114
4 - 102 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Coefficient of Determination, r2,measures the percent of change inypredicted by the change in x
Values range from 0 to 1 Easy to interpret
Correlat ion
For the Nodel Construction example:
r = .901
r2= .81
M lt i l R i
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
102/114
4 - 103 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Mult ip le Regress ion
Analys isIf more than one independent variable is to be
used in the model, linear regression can beextended to multiple regression to
accommodate several independent variables
y = a + b1x1+ b2x2^
Computationally, this is quitecomplex and generally done on the
computer
M lt i l R i
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
103/114
4 - 104 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Mult ip le Regress ion
Analys is
y = 1.80 + .30x1- 5.0x2^
In the Nodel example, including interest rates inthe model gives the new equation:
An improved correlation coefficient of r= .96means this model does a better job of predicting
the change in construction sales
Sales= 1.80 + .30(6) - 5.0(.12) = 3.00Sales= $3,000,000
Moni tor ing and Con tro ll ing
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
104/114
4 - 105 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Measures how well the forecast ispredicting actual values
Ratio of cumulative forecast errors tomean absolute deviation (MAD)
Good tracking signal has low values If forecasts are continually high or low, the
forecast has a bias error
Moni tor ing and Con tro ll ing
ForecastsTracking Signal
Moni tor ing and Con tro ll ing
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
105/114
4 - 106 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Moni tor ing and Con tro ll ing
Forecasts
Trackingsignal
Cumulative errorMAD
=
Trackingsignal =
(Actual demand inperiod i-
Forecast demandin period i)
|Actual - Forecast|/n)
Track ing Signal
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
106/114
4 - 107 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Track ing Signal
Tracking signal
+
0 MADs
Upper control limit
Lower control limit
Time
Signal exceeding limit
Acceptablerange
Track ing Signal Example
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
107/114
4 - 108 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Track ing Signal Example
CumulativeAbsolute Absolute
Actual Forecast Cumm Forecast ForecastQtr Demand Demand Error Error Error Error MAD
1 90 100 -10 -10 10 10 10.02 95 100 -5 -15 5 15 7.53 115 100 +15 0 15 30 10.04 100 110 -10 -10 10 40 10.05 125 110 +15 +5 15 55 11.06 140 110 +30 +35 30 85 14.2
Track ing Signal Example
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
108/114
4 - 109 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
CumulativeAbsolute Absolute
Actual Forecast Cumm Forecast ForecastQtr Demand Demand Error Error Error Error MAD
1 90 100 -10 -10 10 10 10.02 95 100 -5 -15 5 15 7.53 115 100 +15 0 15 30 10.04 100 110 -10 -10 10 40 10.05 125 110 +15 +5 15 55 11.06 140 110 +30 +35 30 85 14.2
Track ing Signal Example
TrackingSignal
(Cumm Error/MAD)
-10/10 = -1-15/7.5 = -2
0/10 = 0-10/10 = -1
+5/11 = +0.5+35/14.2 = +2.5
The variation of the tracking signalbetween -2.0 and +2.5 is within acceptablelimits
Adap t ive Forecast ing
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
109/114
4 - 110 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Adap t ive Forecast ing
Its possible to use the computer tocontinually monitor forecast errorand adjust the values of the
andb
coefficients used in exponentialsmoothing to continually minimizeforecast error
This technique is called adaptivesmoothing
Focus Forecast ing
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
110/114
4 - 111 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Focus Forecast ing
Developed at American Hardware Supply,based on two principles:
1. Sophisticated forecasting models are notalways better than simple ones
2. There is no single technique that shouldbe used for all products or services
This approach uses historical data to testmultiple forecasting models for individual
items The forecasting model with the lowest
error is then used to forecast the nextdemand
Forecast ing in the Serv ice
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
111/114
4 - 112 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Forecast ing in the Serv iceSector
Presents unusual challenges
Special need for short term records
Needs differ greatly as function ofindustry and product
Holidays and other calendar events
Unusual events
Fast Food Restauran t
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
112/114
4 - 113 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Forecast20%
15%
10%
5%
11-12 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-1012-1 2-3 4-5 6-7 8-9 10-11
(Lunchtime) (Dinnertime)
Hour of day
Percen
tageofsales
Figure 4.12
FedEx Call Cen ter Forecast
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
113/114
4 - 114 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
FedEx Call Cen ter Forecast
Figure 4.12
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
Hour of dayA.M. P.M.
2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 12
5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4
114/114
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,
recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Printed in the United States of America.