Top Banner
4 - 1  © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 Forecasting PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and Render Operations Management, 10e Principles of Operations Management, 8e PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl
114

Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

Oct 11, 2015

Download

Documents

Ardale Palillo

Operations Management, 10th Edition
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    1/114

    4 - 1 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    4 Forecasting

    PowerPoint presentation to accompanyHeizer and RenderOperations Management, 10ePrinciples of Operations Management, 8e

    PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    2/114

    4 - 2 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Outl ine

    Global Company Profile: DisneyWorld

    What Is Forecasting?

    Forecasting Time Horizons

    The Influence of Product Life Cycle

    Types Of Forecasts

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    3/114

    4 - 3 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Outl ine Con t inued

    The Strategic Importance ofForecasting

    Human Resources

    Capacity

    Supply Chain Management

    Seven Steps in the ForecastingSystem

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    4/114

    4 - 4 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Outl ine Con t inued

    Forecasting Approaches

    Overview of Qualitative Methods

    Overview of Quantitative Methods

    Time-Series Forecasting

    Decomposition of a Time Series

    Naive Approach

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    5/114

    4 - 5 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Outl ine Con t inued

    Time-Series Forecasting (cont.)

    Moving Averages

    Exponential Smoothing

    Exponential Smoothing with TrendAdjustment

    Trend Projections

    Seasonal Variations in Data

    Cyclical Variations in Data

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    6/114

    4 - 6 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Outl ine Con t inued

    Associative Forecasting Methods:Regression and CorrelationAnalysis

    Using Regression Analysis forForecasting

    Standard Error of the Estimate

    Correlation Coefficients forRegression Lines

    Multiple-Regression Analysis

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    7/1144 - 7 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Outl ine Con t inued

    Monitoring and ControllingForecasts

    Adaptive Smoothing

    Focus Forecasting

    Forecasting in the Service Sector

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    8/1144 - 8 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Learn ing Object ives

    When you complete this chapter youshould be able to :

    1. Understand the three time horizonsand which models apply for each use

    2. Explain when to use each of the fourqualitative models

    3. Apply the naive, moving average,exponential smoothing, and trendmethods

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    9/1144 - 9 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Learn ing Object ives

    When you complete this chapter youshould be able to :

    4. Compute three measures of forecastaccuracy

    5. Develop seasonal indexes

    6. Conduct a regression and correlationanalysis

    7. Use a tracking signal

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    10/1144 - 10 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Forecast ing at Disney World

    Global portfolio includes parks in HongKong, Paris, Tokyo, Orlando, andAnaheim

    Revenues are derived from peoplehowmany visitors and how they spend theirmoney

    Daily management report contains onlythe forecast and actual attendance ateach park

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    11/1144 - 11 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Forecast ing at Disney World

    Disney generates daily, weekly, monthly,annual, and 5-year forecasts

    Forecast used by labor management,maintenance, operations, finance, andpark scheduling

    Forecast used to adjust opening times,

    rides, shows, staffing levels, and guestsadmitted

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    12/114

    4 - 12 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Forecast ing at Disney World

    20% of customers come from outside theUSA

    Economic model includes grossdomestic product, cross-exchange rates,arrivals into the USA

    A staff of 35 analysts and 70 field people

    survey 1 million park guests, employees,and travel professionals each year

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    13/114

    4 - 13 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Forecast ing at Disney World

    Inputs to the forecasting model includeairline specials, Federal Reservepolicies, Wall Street trends,

    vacation/holiday schedules for 3,000school districts around the world

    Average forecast error for the 5-yearforecast is 5%

    Average forecast error for annualforecasts is between 0% and 3%

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    14/114

    4 - 14 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    What is Forecast ing?

    Process of predictinga future event

    Underlying basis

    of all businessdecisions

    Production

    Inventory

    Personnel

    Facilities

    ??

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    15/114

    4 - 15 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Short-range forecast Up to 1 year, generally less than 3 months

    Purchasing, job scheduling, workforcelevels, job assignments, production levels

    Medium-range forecast 3 months to 3 years

    Sales and production planning, budgeting

    Long-range forecast 3+years

    New product planning, facility location,research and development

    Forecast ing Time Horizons

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    16/114

    4 - 16 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Dist ingu ish ing Dif ferences

    Medium/long rangeforecasts deal withmore comprehensive issues and supportmanagement decisions regarding

    planning and products, plants andprocesses

    Short-termforecasting usually employsdifferent methodologies than longer-term

    forecasting Short-termforecasts tend to be more

    accurate than longer-term forecasts

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    17/114

    4 - 17 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    In f luence of Product L i fe

    Cycle

    Introduction and growth require longerforecasts than maturity and decline

    As product passes through life cycle,forecasts are useful in projecting

    Staffing levels

    Inventory levels

    Factory capacity

    IntroductionGrowthMaturityDecline

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    18/114

    4 - 18 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Product L i fe Cycle

    Best period toincrease marketshare

    R&D engineering iscritical

    Practical to changeprice or qualityimage

    Strengthen niche

    Poor time tochange image,price, or quality

    Competitive costsbecome criticalDefend marketposition

    Cost controlcritical

    Introduction Growth Maturity Decline

    Com

    panyStrateg

    y/Issues

    Figure 2.5

    Internet search engines

    Sales

    Drive-throughrestaurants

    CD-ROMs

    AnalogTVs

    iPods

    Boeing 787

    LCD &plasma TVs

    Twitter

    Avatars

    Xbox 360

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    19/114

    4 - 19 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Product L i fe Cycle

    Product designanddevelopmentcritical

    Frequent

    product andprocess designchanges

    Short productionruns

    High productioncosts

    Limited models

    Attention toquality

    Introduction Growth Maturity Decline

    O

    MS

    trategy/Is

    sues

    Forecastingcritical

    Product andprocessreliability

    Competitiveproductimprovementsand options

    Increase capacity

    Shift towardproduct focus

    Enhancedistribution

    Standardization

    Fewer productchanges, moreminor changes

    Optimum

    capacityIncreasingstability ofprocess

    Long productionruns

    Productimprovementand cost cutting

    Little productdifferentiation

    Costminimization

    Overcapacity

    in theindustry

    Prune line toeliminateitems notreturninggood margin

    Reducecapacity

    Figure 2.5

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    20/114

    4 - 20 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Types o f Forecasts

    Economic forecasts

    Address business cycleinflation rate,money supply, housing starts, etc.

    Technological forecasts

    Predict rate of technological progress

    Impacts development of new products

    Demand forecasts Predict sales of existing products and

    services

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    21/114

    4 - 21 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Strateg ic Importance of

    Forecast ing

    Human ResourcesHiring, training,laying off workers

    CapacityCapacity shortages canresult in undependable delivery, lossof customers, loss of market share

    Supply Chain ManagementGoodsupplier relations and priceadvantages

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    22/114

    4 - 22 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Seven Steps in Forecast ing

    1. Determine the use of the forecast2. Select the items to be forecasted

    3. Determine the time horizon of the

    forecast4. Select the forecasting model(s)

    5. Gather the data

    6. Make the forecast

    7. Validate and implement results

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    23/114

    4 - 23 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    The Realit ies!

    Forecasts are seldom perfect

    Most techniques assume anunderlying stability in the system

    Product family and aggregatedforecasts are more accurate than

    individual product forecasts

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    24/114

    4 - 24 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Forecast ing App roaches

    Used when situation is vague

    and little data exist New products

    New technology

    Involves intuition, experience e.g., forecasting sales on

    Internet

    Qualitative Methods

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    25/114

    4 - 25 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Forecast ing App roaches

    Used when situation is stable and

    historical data exist Existing products

    Current technology

    Involves mathematical techniques e.g., forecasting sales of color

    televisions

    Quantitative Methods

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    26/114

    4 - 26 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Overview o f Qual i tat ive

    Methods1. Jury of executive opinion

    Pool opinions of high-level experts,sometimes augment by statisticalmodels

    2. Delphi method

    Panel of experts, queried iteratively

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    27/114

    4 - 27 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Overview o f Qual i tat ive

    Methods3. Sales force composite

    Estimates from individualsalespersons are reviewed forreasonableness, then aggregated

    4. Consumer Market Survey

    Ask the customer

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    28/114

    4 - 28 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Involves small group of high-levelexperts and managers

    Group estimates demand by working

    together Combines managerial experience with

    statistical models

    Relatively quick

    Group-thinkdisadvantage

    Ju ry o f Execu t ive Opinion

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    29/114

    4 - 29 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Sales Force Composi te

    Each salesperson projects his orher sales

    Combined at district and nationallevels

    Sales reps know customers wants

    Tends to be overly optimistic

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    30/114

    4 - 30 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Delph i Method

    Iterative groupprocess,continues untilconsensus is

    reached

    3 types ofparticipants

    Decision makers

    Staff

    Respondents

    Staff(Administering

    survey)

    Decision Makers(Evaluate

    responses andmake decisions)

    Respondents(People who canmake valuable

    judgments)

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    31/114

    4 - 31 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Consumer Market Survey

    Ask customers about purchasingplans

    What consumers say, and whatthey actually do are often different

    Sometimes difficult to answer

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    32/114

    4 - 32 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Overview of Quanti tative

    Approaches1. Naive approach

    2. Moving averages

    3. Exponentialsmoothing

    4. Trend projection5. Linear regression

    time-seriesmodels

    associativemodel

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    33/114

    4 - 33 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Set of evenly spaced numerical data

    Obtained by observing response

    variable at regular time periods Forecast based only on past values,

    no other variables important

    Assumes that factors influencingpast and present will continueinfluence in future

    Time Series Forecast ing

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    34/114

    4 - 34 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Trend

    Seasonal

    Cyclical

    Random

    Time Series Componen ts

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    35/114

    4 - 35 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Components of Demand

    Deman

    dforproductor

    service

    | | | |1 2 3 4

    Time (years)

    Average demandover 4 years

    Trendcomponent

    Actual demandline

    Random variation

    Figure 4.1

    Seasonal peaks

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    36/114

    4 - 36 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Persistent, overall upward ordownward pattern

    Changes due to population,technology, age, culture, etc.

    Typically several yearsduration

    Trend Component

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    37/114

    4 - 37 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Regular pattern of up anddown fluctuations

    Due to weather, customs, etc.

    Occurs within a single year

    Seasonal Component

    Number ofPeriod Length Seasons

    Week Day 7Month Week 4-4.5Month Day 28-31

    Year Quarter 4Year Month 12Year Week 52

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    38/114

    4 - 38 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Repeating up and down movements

    Affected by business cycle,political, and economic factors

    Multiple years duration

    Often causal or

    associativerelationships

    Cyc l ical Component

    0 5 10 15 20

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    39/114

    4 - 39 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Erratic, unsystematic, residualfluctuations

    Due to random variation or unforeseenevents

    Short durationand nonrepeating

    Random Component

    M T W T F

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    40/114

    4 - 40 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Naive Approach

    Assumes demand in nextperiod is the same asdemand in most recent period

    e.g., If January sales were 68, thenFebruary sales will be 68

    Sometimes cost effective and

    efficient Can be good starting point

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    41/114

    4 - 41 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    MA is a series of arithmetic means

    Used if little or no trend

    Used often for smoothing

    Provides overall impression of dataover time

    Mov ing Average Method

    Moving average =demand in previous nperiods

    n

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    42/114

    4 - 42 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    January 10

    February 12March 13April 16May 19

    June 23July 26

    Actual 3-MonthMonth Shed Sales Moving Average

    (12 + 13 + 16)/3 = 13 2/3

    (13 + 16 + 19)/3 = 16(16 + 19 + 23)/3 = 19 1/3

    Mov ing Average Examp le

    10

    1213

    (10+ 12+ 13)/3 = 11 2/3

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    43/114

    4 - 43 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Graph o f Moving Average

    | | | | | | | | | | | |

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    ShedSales

    30

    28

    26

    24 22

    20

    18

    16

    14

    12

    10

    ActualSales

    MovingAverageForecast

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    44/114

    4 - 44 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Used when some trend might bepresent

    Older data usually less important

    Weights based on experience andintuition

    Weigh ted Mov ing Average

    Weightedmoving average =

    (weight for period n)

    x (demand in period n)

    weights

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    45/114

    4 - 45 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    January 10February 12March 13

    April 16May 19June 23July 26

    Actual 3-Month Weighted

    Month Shed Sales Moving Average

    [(3 x 16) + (2 x 13) + (12)]/6 = 141/3[(3 x 19) + (2 x 16) + (13)]/6 = 17[(3 x 23) + (2 x 19) + (16)]/6 = 201/2

    Weigh ted Mov ing Average

    101213

    [(3 x 13) + (2 x 12) + (10)]/6 = 121

    /6

    Weights Applied Period

    3 Last month2 Two months ago1 Three months ago

    6 Sum of weights

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    46/114

    4 - 46 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Increasing nsmooths the forecastbut makes it less sensitive to

    changes

    Do not forecast trends well

    Require extensive historical data

    Poten t ial Prob lems With

    Moving Average

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    47/114

    4 - 47 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Moving Average AndWeigh ted Mov ing Average

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    Salesdeman

    d

    | | | | | | | | | | | |

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    Actualsales

    Movingaverage

    Weightedmovingaverage

    Figure 4.2

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    48/114

    4 - 48 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Form of weighted moving average

    Weights decline exponentially

    Most recent data weighted most

    Requires smoothing constant (

    )

    Ranges from 0 to 1

    Subjectively chosen Involves little record keeping of past

    data

    Exponent ial Smoo thing

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    49/114

    4 - 49 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Exponent ial Smoo thing

    New forecast = Last periods forecast+ (Last periods actual demand

    Last periods forecast)

    Ft= Ft1+ (A t1- Ft1)

    where Ft= new forecast

    Ft1= previous forecast= smoothing (or weighting)

    constant (0 1)

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    50/114

    4 - 50 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Exponent ial Smoo thing

    ExamplePredicted demand = 142 Ford MustangsActual demand = 153

    Smoothing constant = .20

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    51/114

    4 - 51 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Exponent ial Smoo thing

    ExamplePredicted demand = 142 Ford MustangsActual demand = 153

    Smoothing constant = .20

    New forecast = 142 + .2(153142)

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    52/114

    4 - 52 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Exponent ial Smoo thing

    ExamplePredicted demand = 142 Ford MustangsActual demand = 153

    Smoothing constant = .20

    New forecast = 142 + .2(153142)

    = 142 + 2.2= 144.2 144 cars

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    53/114

    4 - 53 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Effect o f

    Smoo th ing Constants

    Weight Assigned to

    Most 2nd Most 3rd Most 4th Most 5th MostRecent Recent Recent Recent RecentSmoothing Period Period Period Period PeriodConstant (

    )

    (1 -

    )

    (1 -

    )2

    (1 -

    )3

    (1 -

    )4

    = .1 .1 .09 .081 .073 .066

    = .5 .5 .25 .125 .063 .031

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    54/114

    4 - 54 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Impact o f Dif feren t

    225

    200

    175

    150 | | | | | | | | |

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    Quarter

    Demand

    = .1

    Actualdemand

    = .5

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    55/114

    4 - 55 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Impact o f Dif feren t

    225

    200

    175

    150 | | | | | | | | |

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    Quarter

    Demand

    = .1

    Actualdemand

    = .5 Chose high values of

    when underlying averageis likely to change

    Choose low values of when underlying averageis stable

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    56/114

    4 - 56 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Choos ing

    The objective is to obtain the mostaccurate forecast no matter thetechnique

    We generally do this by selecting themodel that gives us the lowest forecasterror

    Forecast error = Actual demand - Forecast value

    = A t- Ft

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    57/114

    4 - 57 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Common Measu res o f Error

    Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD)

    MAD =

    |Actual - Forecast|

    n

    Mean Squared Error (MSE)

    MSE =(Forecast Errors)2

    n

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    58/114

    4 - 58 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Common Measu res o f Error

    Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE)

    MAPE =100|Actuali- Forecasti|/Actuali

    n

    n

    i= 1

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    59/114

    4 - 59 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Compar ison o f ForecastError

    Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation

    Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50

    1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00

    2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.754 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.125 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.566 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78

    7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30

    82.45 98.62

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    60/114

    4 - 60 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Compar ison o f ForecastError

    Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation

    Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50

    1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00

    2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.754 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.125 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.566 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78

    7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30

    82.45 98.62

    MAD =|deviations|

    n

    = 82.45/8 = 10.31

    For = .10

    = 98.62/8 = 12.33

    For = .50

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    61/114

    4 - 61 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Compar ison o f ForecastError

    Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation

    Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50

    1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00

    2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.754 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.125 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.566 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78

    7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30

    82.45 98.62MAD 10.31 12.33

    = 1,526.54/8 = 190.82

    For = .10

    = 1,561.91/8 = 195.24

    For = .50

    MSE = (forecast errors)2

    n

    C i f F

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    62/114

    4 - 62 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Compar ison o f ForecastError

    Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation

    Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50

    1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00

    2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.754 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.125 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.566 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78

    7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30

    82.45 98.62MAD 10.31 12.33MSE 190.82 195.24

    = 44.75/8 = 5.59%

    For = .10

    = 54.05/8 = 6.76%

    For = .50

    MAPE = 100|deviationi|/actuali

    n

    n

    i= 1

    C i f F t

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    63/114

    4 - 63 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Compar ison o f ForecastError

    Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation

    Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded = .10 = .10 = .50 = .50

    1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00

    2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.754 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.125 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.566 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78

    7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30

    82.45 98.62MAD 10.31 12.33MSE 190.82 195.24

    MAPE 5.59% 6.76%

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    64/114

    4 - 64 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Exponent ial Smoo thing w i th

    Trend Adjus tmentWhen a trend is present, exponentialsmoothing must be modified

    Forecastincluding (FITt) =trend

    Exponentially Exponentiallysmoothed (Ft) + smoothed (Tt)forecast trend

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    65/114

    4 - 65 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Exponent ial Smoo thing w i th

    Trend Adjus tment

    Ft= (A t- 1) + (1 - )(Ft- 1+ Tt- 1)

    Tt= b(Ft - Ft- 1) + (1 - b)Tt- 1

    Step 1: Compute Ft

    Step 2: Compute Tt

    Step 3: Calculate the forecast FITt= Ft+ Tt

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    66/114

    4 - 66 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Exponent ial Smoo thing w ithTrend Adjustment Example

    ForecastActual Smoothed Smoothed Including

    Month(t) Demand (A t) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt

    1 12 11 2 13.00

    2 173 204 195 246 21

    7 318 289 36

    10

    Table 4.1

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    67/114

    4 - 67 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Exponent ial Smoo thing w ithTrend Adjustment Example

    ForecastActual Smoothed Smoothed Including

    Month(t) Demand (A t) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt

    1 12 11 2 13.00

    2 173 204 195 246 21

    7 318 289 36

    10

    Table 4.1

    F2 = A 1+ (1 - )(F1+ T1)F2 = (.2)(12) + (1 - .2)(11 + 2)

    = 2.4 + 10.4 = 12.8 units

    Step 1: Forecast for Month 2

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    68/114

    4 - 68 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Exponent ial Smoo thing w ithTrend Adjustment Example

    ForecastActual Smoothed Smoothed Including

    Month(t) Demand (A t) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt

    1 12 11 2 13.00

    2 17 12.803 204 195 246 21

    7 318 289 36

    10

    Table 4.1

    T2 = b(F2- F1) + (1 - b)T1T2 = (.4)(12.8 - 11) + (1 - .4)(2)

    = .72 + 1.2 = 1.92 units

    Step 2: Trend for Month 2

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    69/114

    4 - 69 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Exponent ial Smoo thing w ithTrend Adjustment Example

    ForecastActual Smoothed Smoothed Including

    Month(t) Demand (A t) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt

    1 12 11 2 13.00

    2 17 12.80 1.923 204 195 246 21

    7 318 289 36

    10

    Table 4.1

    FIT2 = F

    2+ T

    2

    FIT2 = 12.8 + 1.92

    = 14.72 units

    Step 3: Calculate FITfor Month 2

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    70/114

    4 - 70 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Exponent ial Smoo thing w ithTrend Adjustment Example

    ForecastActual Smoothed Smoothed Including

    Month(t) Demand (A t) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt

    1 12 11 2 13.00

    2 17 12.80 1.92 14.723 204 195 246 21

    7 318 289 36

    10

    Table 4.1

    15.18 2.10 17.2817.82 2.32 20.1419.91 2.23 22.1422.51 2.38 24.89

    24.11 2.07 26.1827.14 2.45 29.5929.28 2.32 31.6032.48 2.68 35.16

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    71/114

    4 - 71 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Exponent ial Smoo thing w ithTrend Adjustment Example

    Figure 4.3

    | | | | | | | | |

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    Time (month)

    Productdem

    and

    35

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    Actual demand (A t)

    Forecast including trend (FITt)

    with = .2 and b= .4

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    72/114

    4 - 72 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Trend Project ions

    Fitting a trend line to historical data pointsto project into the medium to long-range

    Linear trends can be found using the leastsquares technique

    y= a+ bx^

    where y = computed value of the variable to

    be predicted (dependent variable)a = y-axis interceptb = slope of the regression linex = the independent variable

    ^

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    73/114

    4 - 73 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Least Squares Method

    Time period

    Value

    sofDepende

    ntVariable

    Figure 4.4

    Deviation1

    (error)

    Deviation5

    Deviation7

    Deviation2

    Deviation6

    Deviation4

    Deviation3

    Actual observation(y-value)

    Trend line, y= a+ bx^

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    74/114

    4 - 74 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Least Squares Method

    Time period

    Value

    sofDepende

    ntVariable

    Figure 4.4

    Deviation1

    (error)

    Deviation5

    Deviation7

    Deviation2

    Deviation6

    Deviation4

    Deviation3

    Actual observation(y-value)

    Trend line, y= a+ bx^

    Least squares methodminimizes the sum of the

    squared errors (deviations)

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    75/114

    4 - 75 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Least Squares Method

    Equations to calculate the regression variables

    b =Sxy - nxy

    Sx2- nx2

    y = a + bx^

    a = y - bx

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    76/114

    4 - 76 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Least Squares Example

    b= = = 10.54xy- nxy

    x2- nx2

    3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86)

    140 - (7)(42)

    a= y- bx= 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70

    Time Electrical Power

    Year Period (x) Demand x2 xy

    2003 1 74 1 742004 2 79 4 1582005 3 80 9 2402006 4 90 16 360

    2007 5 105 25 5252008 6 142 36 8522009 7 122 49 854

    x= 28 y= 692 x2= 140 xy= 3,063x= 4 y= 98.86

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    77/114

    4 - 77 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    b= = = 10.54xy- nxy

    x2- nx2

    3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86)

    140 - (7)(42)

    a= y- bx= 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70

    Time Electrical Power

    Year Period (x) Demand x2 xy

    2003 1 74 1 742004 2 79 4 1582005 3 80 9 2402006 4 90 16 360

    2007 5 105 25 5252008 6 142 36 8522009 7 122 49 854

    x= 28 y= 692 x2= 140 xy= 3,063x= 4 y= 98.86

    Least Squares Example

    The trend line is

    y= 56.70 + 10.54x^

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    78/114

    4 - 78 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Least Squares Example

    | | | | | | | | |2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

    160

    150

    140

    130

    120 110

    100

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    Year

    Powerdemand

    Trend line,y= 56.70 + 10.54x^

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    79/114

    4 - 80 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Seasonal Variations In Data

    The multiplicative

    seasonal modelcan adjust trenddata for seasonalvariations indemand

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    80/114

    4 - 81 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Seasonal Variations In Data

    1. Find average historical demand for each season

    2. Compute the average demand over all seasons

    3. Compute a seasonal index for each season

    4. Estimate next years total demand

    5. Divide this estimate of total demand by the

    number of seasons, then multiply it by theseasonal index for that season

    Steps in the process:

    S

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    81/114

    4 - 82 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Seasonal Index Examp le

    Jan 80 85 105 90 94

    Feb 70 85 85 80 94

    Mar 80 93 82 85 94

    Apr 90 95 115 100 94May 113 125 131 123 94

    Jun 110 115 120 115 94

    Jul 100 102 113 105 94

    Aug 88 102 110 100 94

    Sept 85 90 95 90 94

    Oct 77 78 85 80 94

    Nov 75 72 83 80 94

    Dec 82 78 80 80 94

    Demand Average Average SeasonalMonth 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index

    S l I d E l

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    82/114

    4 - 83 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Seasonal Index Examp le

    Jan 80 85 105 90 94

    Feb 70 85 85 80 94

    Mar 80 93 82 85 94

    Apr 90 95 115 100 94May 113 125 131 123 94

    Jun 110 115 120 115 94

    Jul 100 102 113 105 94

    Aug 88 102 110 100 94

    Sept 85 90 95 90 94

    Oct 77 78 85 80 94

    Nov 75 72 83 80 94

    Dec 82 78 80 80 94

    Demand Average Average SeasonalMonth 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index

    0.957

    Seasonal index =Average 2007-2009 monthly demand

    Average monthly demand

    = 90/94 = .957

    S l I d E l

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    83/114

    4 - 84 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Seasonal Index Examp le

    Jan 80 85 105 90 94 0.957

    Feb 70 85 85 80 94 0.851

    Mar 80 93 82 85 94 0.904

    Apr 90 95 115 100 94 1.064May 113 125 131 123 94 1.309

    Jun 110 115 120 115 94 1.223

    Jul 100 102 113 105 94 1.117

    Aug 88 102 110 100 94 1.064

    Sept 85 90 95 90 94 0.957

    Oct 77 78 85 80 94 0.851

    Nov 75 72 83 80 94 0.851

    Dec 82 78 80 80 94 0.851

    Demand Average Average SeasonalMonth 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index

    S l I d E l

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    84/114

    4 - 85 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Seasonal Index Examp le

    Jan 80 85 105 90 94 0.957

    Feb 70 85 85 80 94 0.851

    Mar 80 93 82 85 94 0.904

    Apr 90 95 115 100 94 1.064May 113 125 131 123 94 1.309

    Jun 110 115 120 115 94 1.223

    Jul 100 102 113 105 94 1.117

    Aug 88 102 110 100 94 1.064

    Sept 85 90 95 90 94 0.957

    Oct 77 78 85 80 94 0.851

    Nov 75 72 83 80 94 0.851

    Dec 82 78 80 80 94 0.851

    Demand Average Average SeasonalMonth 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index

    Expected annual demand = 1,200

    Jan x .957 = 961,200

    12

    Feb x .851 = 851,20012

    Forecast for 2010

    S l I d E l

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    85/114

    4 - 86 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Seasonal Index Examp le

    140

    130

    120

    110

    100

    90

    80

    70 | | | | | | | | | | | |

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    Time

    Demand

    2010 Forecast2009 Demand

    2008 Demand

    2007 Demand

    San Diego Hosp ital

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    86/114

    4 - 87 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    San Diego Hosp ital

    10,200

    10,000

    9,800

    9,600

    9,400

    9,200

    9,000 | | | | | | | | | | | |

    Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78

    Month

    InpatientDays

    9530

    9551

    9573

    9594

    9616

    9637

    9659

    9680

    9702

    9724

    97459766

    Figure 4.6

    Trend Data

    San Diego Hosp ital

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    87/114

    4 - 88 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    San Diego Hosp ital

    1.06

    1.04

    1.02

    1.00

    0.98

    0.96

    0.94

    0.92 | | | | | | | | | | | |

    Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78

    Month

    IndexforInpatie

    ntDays 1.04

    1.021.01

    0.99

    1.031.04

    1.00

    0.98

    0.97

    0.99

    0.970.96

    Figure 4.7

    Seasonal Indices

    San Diego Hosp ital

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    88/114

    4 - 89 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    San Diego Hosp ital

    10,200

    10,000

    9,800

    9,600

    9,400

    9,200

    9,000 | | | | | | | | | | | |

    Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78

    Month

    InpatientDays

    Figure 4.8

    9911

    9265

    9764

    9520

    9691

    9411

    9949

    9724

    9542

    9355

    10068

    9572

    Combined Trend and Seasonal Forecast

    A i t i F t i

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    89/114

    4 - 90 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Associat ive Forecast ing

    Used when changes in one or moreindependent variables can be used to predict

    the changes in the dependent variable

    Most common technique is linearregression analysis

    We apply this technique just as we didin the time series example

    A i t i F t i

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    90/114

    4 - 91 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Associat ive Forecast ing

    Forecasting an outcome based onpredictor variables using the least squarestechnique

    y= a+ bx^

    where y = computed value of the variable tobe predicted (dependent variable)

    a = y-axis intercept

    b = slope of the regression line

    x = the independent variable though topredict the value of the dependentvariable

    ^

    Associat ive Forecast ing

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    91/114

    4 - 92 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Associat ive Forecast ingExample

    Sales Area Payroll($ millions), y ($ billions), x

    2.0 13.0 3

    2.5 42.0 22.0 13.5 7

    4.0

    3.0

    2.0

    1.0

    | | | | | | |0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    Sales

    Area payroll

    Associat ive Forecast ing

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    92/114

    4 - 93 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Associat ive Forecast ingExample

    Sales, y Payroll, x x2 xy

    2.0 1 1 2.03.0 3 9 9.02.5 4 16 10.0

    2.0 2 4 4.02.0 1 1 2.03.5 7 49 24.5

    y= 15.0 x= 18 x2= 80 xy= 51.5

    x= x/6 = 18/6 = 3

    y= y/6 = 15/6 = 2.5

    b= = = .25xy - nxy

    x2- nx2

    51.5 - (6)(3)(2.5)80 - (6)(32)

    a= y- bx = 2.5 - (.25)(3) = 1.75

    Associat ive Forecast ing

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    93/114

    4 - 94 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Associat ive Forecast ingExample

    y= 1.75 + .25x^ Sales = 1.75 + .25(payroll)

    If payroll next year

    is estimated to be$6 billion, then:

    Sales = 1.75 + .25(6)Sales = $3,250,000

    4.0

    3.0

    2.0

    1.0

    | | | | | | |0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    N

    odels

    sales

    Area payroll

    3.25

    Standard Erro r o f the

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    94/114

    4 - 95 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Standard Erro r o f theEst imate

    A forecast is just a point estimate of afuture value

    This point is

    actually themean of aprobabilitydistribution

    Figure 4.9

    4.0

    3.0

    2.0

    1.0

    | | | | | | |0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    N

    odels

    sales

    Area payroll

    3.25

    Standard Erro r o f the

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    95/114

    4 - 96 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Standard Erro r o f theEst imate

    where y = y-value of each data point

    yc = computed value of the dependentvariable, from the regressionequation

    n = number of data points

    Sy,x=(y - yc)

    2

    n - 2

    Standard Erro r o f the

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    96/114

    4 - 97 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Standard Erro r o f theEst imate

    Computationally, this equation isconsiderably easier to use

    We use the standard error to set upprediction intervals around thepoint estimate

    Sy,x=y2- ay - bxy

    n - 2

    Standard Erro r o f the

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    97/114

    4 - 98 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Standard Erro r o f theEst imate

    4.0

    3.0

    2.0

    1.0

    | | | | | | |0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    No

    dels

    sales

    Area payroll

    3.25

    Sy,x= =y2- ay - bxy

    n - 2

    39.5 - 1.75(15) - .25(51.5)

    6 - 2

    Sy,x= .306

    The standard errorof the estimate is

    $306,000 in sales

    Correlat ion

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    98/114

    4 - 99 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    How strong is the linearrelationship between the variables?

    Correlation does not necessarily

    imply causality!

    Coefficient of correlation, r,measures degree of association

    Values range from -1 to +1

    Correlat ion

    C l t i C ff i i t

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    99/114

    4 - 100 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Correlat ion Coeff ic ient

    r =nSxy- SxSy

    [nSx2- (Sx)2][nSy2- (Sy)2]

    C l t i C ff i i t

    y y

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    100/114

    4 - 101 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Correlat ion Coeff ic ient

    r =nSxy- SxSy

    [nSx2- (Sx)2][nSy2- (Sy)2]

    y

    x(a) Perfect positivecorrelation:

    r= +1

    y

    x(b) Positivecorrelation:

    0 < r< 1

    y

    x(c) No correlation:r= 0

    y

    x(d) Perfect negativecorrelation:r= -1

    Correlat ion

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    101/114

    4 - 102 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Coefficient of Determination, r2,measures the percent of change inypredicted by the change in x

    Values range from 0 to 1 Easy to interpret

    Correlat ion

    For the Nodel Construction example:

    r = .901

    r2= .81

    M lt i l R i

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    102/114

    4 - 103 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Mult ip le Regress ion

    Analys isIf more than one independent variable is to be

    used in the model, linear regression can beextended to multiple regression to

    accommodate several independent variables

    y = a + b1x1+ b2x2^

    Computationally, this is quitecomplex and generally done on the

    computer

    M lt i l R i

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    103/114

    4 - 104 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Mult ip le Regress ion

    Analys is

    y = 1.80 + .30x1- 5.0x2^

    In the Nodel example, including interest rates inthe model gives the new equation:

    An improved correlation coefficient of r= .96means this model does a better job of predicting

    the change in construction sales

    Sales= 1.80 + .30(6) - 5.0(.12) = 3.00Sales= $3,000,000

    Moni tor ing and Con tro ll ing

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    104/114

    4 - 105 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Measures how well the forecast ispredicting actual values

    Ratio of cumulative forecast errors tomean absolute deviation (MAD)

    Good tracking signal has low values If forecasts are continually high or low, the

    forecast has a bias error

    Moni tor ing and Con tro ll ing

    ForecastsTracking Signal

    Moni tor ing and Con tro ll ing

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    105/114

    4 - 106 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Moni tor ing and Con tro ll ing

    Forecasts

    Trackingsignal

    Cumulative errorMAD

    =

    Trackingsignal =

    (Actual demand inperiod i-

    Forecast demandin period i)

    |Actual - Forecast|/n)

    Track ing Signal

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    106/114

    4 - 107 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Track ing Signal

    Tracking signal

    +

    0 MADs

    Upper control limit

    Lower control limit

    Time

    Signal exceeding limit

    Acceptablerange

    Track ing Signal Example

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    107/114

    4 - 108 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Track ing Signal Example

    CumulativeAbsolute Absolute

    Actual Forecast Cumm Forecast ForecastQtr Demand Demand Error Error Error Error MAD

    1 90 100 -10 -10 10 10 10.02 95 100 -5 -15 5 15 7.53 115 100 +15 0 15 30 10.04 100 110 -10 -10 10 40 10.05 125 110 +15 +5 15 55 11.06 140 110 +30 +35 30 85 14.2

    Track ing Signal Example

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    108/114

    4 - 109 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    CumulativeAbsolute Absolute

    Actual Forecast Cumm Forecast ForecastQtr Demand Demand Error Error Error Error MAD

    1 90 100 -10 -10 10 10 10.02 95 100 -5 -15 5 15 7.53 115 100 +15 0 15 30 10.04 100 110 -10 -10 10 40 10.05 125 110 +15 +5 15 55 11.06 140 110 +30 +35 30 85 14.2

    Track ing Signal Example

    TrackingSignal

    (Cumm Error/MAD)

    -10/10 = -1-15/7.5 = -2

    0/10 = 0-10/10 = -1

    +5/11 = +0.5+35/14.2 = +2.5

    The variation of the tracking signalbetween -2.0 and +2.5 is within acceptablelimits

    Adap t ive Forecast ing

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    109/114

    4 - 110 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Adap t ive Forecast ing

    Its possible to use the computer tocontinually monitor forecast errorand adjust the values of the

    andb

    coefficients used in exponentialsmoothing to continually minimizeforecast error

    This technique is called adaptivesmoothing

    Focus Forecast ing

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    110/114

    4 - 111 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Focus Forecast ing

    Developed at American Hardware Supply,based on two principles:

    1. Sophisticated forecasting models are notalways better than simple ones

    2. There is no single technique that shouldbe used for all products or services

    This approach uses historical data to testmultiple forecasting models for individual

    items The forecasting model with the lowest

    error is then used to forecast the nextdemand

    Forecast ing in the Serv ice

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    111/114

    4 - 112 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Forecast ing in the Serv iceSector

    Presents unusual challenges

    Special need for short term records

    Needs differ greatly as function ofindustry and product

    Holidays and other calendar events

    Unusual events

    Fast Food Restauran t

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    112/114

    4 - 113 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Forecast20%

    15%

    10%

    5%

    11-12 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-1012-1 2-3 4-5 6-7 8-9 10-11

    (Lunchtime) (Dinnertime)

    Hour of day

    Percen

    tageofsales

    Figure 4.12

    FedEx Call Cen ter Forecast

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    113/114

    4 - 114 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    FedEx Call Cen ter Forecast

    Figure 4.12

    12%

    10%

    8%

    6%

    4%

    2%

    0%

    Hour of dayA.M. P.M.

    2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 12

  • 5/21/2018 Operations Management, 10th Edition chapter 4

    114/114

    All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval

    system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,

    recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.

    Printed in the United States of America.