Francesca “Nicole” Altieri Justin Dickinson * Openness and Fear
*Background Research
*Oxytocin is a hormone in the brain and body that is secreted during sexual encounters and social facilitation
*Oxytocin has been positively correlated with openness
*Those who are higher in levels of openness reported having an increased amount of oxytocin
*Background Research
*Missig et al (2010) conducted a study with rats
*When rats were put into a fearful situation, oxytocin was injected to neutralize the fearful response
*There was a negative correlation between amount of oxytocin administered and amount of fear the rat displayed
*There was no significant difference between type of fear and amount of oxytocin administered
*Hypotheses
*There would be a negative correlation between openness and startle fear
*Startle fear: a sudden shock or alarm
*There would be a negative correlation between openness and suspense fear
*Suspense: the uncertainty and building anxiety of a certain outcome
Measures*Heart Rate
*Novelty Seeking
*Harm Avoidance
*Fantasy Scale of Empathy
*Positive Affect
*Negative Affect
*Risky Behavior
Participants & Design
*SONA Systems
*20
*Male and Female
*2 level (Clip: Startle vs. Suspense) between-participant design
*Methods
*Procedure
*Informed Consent
*Cover Story
*Questionnaires
*Fear/Openness
*Risky Behavior
*Video Clip
*Paranormal Activity 3
*PANAS
*Debrief
Independent*Startle vs. Suspense
*Openness
*Novelty Seeking
*Fantasy Scale of Empathy
*Harm Avoidance
Dependent*Heart Rate
*Difference Score = (avg.- max)
*Positive Affect
*Negative Affect
*Risky Behavior
*Variables
Positive* Fantasy Scale of Empathy &
Negative Affect
* (r = .543, p = .016)
* Maximum Heart Rate & Harm Avoidance
* (r = .489, p = .034)
Negative* Novelty Seeking & Harm
Avoidance
* (r = -.570, p = .009)
* Harm Avoidance & Risky Behavior
* (r = -.501, p = .024)
* Heart Rate Increase & Positive Affect
* (r = -.706, p = .015):
* Openness & Maximum Heart Rate
* (r = -.217, p = .372)
*Basic Significant Patterns
* Openness & Clip & Positive Affect
* High Openness= More Positive Affect with Startle
* Low Openness= More Positive Affect with Suspense
* p = .018
*Interaction
high openness low openness0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
startlesuspense
Posit
ive A
ffect
*Discussion
*There was not a significant correlation between openness and maximum heart rate
*However, there were patterns in the expected direction
*Those who were higher in openness responded more positively to the startle clip
*They found it more “fun” or “amusing”
*More open to sudden changes
*Those who reported lower in openness responded more positively in the suspense condition
*This might be because it was a more gradual change
*Applications
*Can be used in therapy to treat phobias
*By identifying the type of fearful response (startle vs. suspense) the therapist can gain useful knowledge about how to overcome the problem through behavioral therapy
*Using startle or suspense as a scare tactic to appeal to a wider audience during horror films
*Limitations/ Future Research
*Some limitations to the study include:
*Small sample size= less variability= less significance
*Personality research typically requires a large amount of variability
*Age; participants were local college students
*Future research should include a larger sample size