OPENDAYS 2011 OPENDAYS 2011 Added value and efficiency Added value and efficiency through the use of article through the use of article 37.6(b) and EGTC 37.6(b) and EGTC Cooperation in the mainstream programmes Cooperation in the mainstream programmes example of Limousin (France) example of Limousin (France) • 731 000 731 000 inhabitants inhabitants • 43 inhab / km² 43 inhab / km² • 39% population is 39% population is rural rural
8
Embed
OPENDAYS 2011 Added value and efficiency through the use of article 37.6(b) and EGTC Cooperation in the mainstream programmes example of Limousin (France)
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
OPENDAYS 2011OPENDAYS 2011
Added value and efficiency through the use Added value and efficiency through the use of article 37.6(b) and EGTCof article 37.6(b) and EGTC
Cooperation in the mainstream programmes Cooperation in the mainstream programmes example of Limousin (France)example of Limousin (France)
• 731 000 inhabitants731 000 inhabitants
• 43 inhab / km²43 inhab / km²
• 39% population is rural39% population is rural
Strategic objectivesTo reduce the negative impact of borders on economic development and EU territorial integration
To improve the efficiency of policies and tools dedicated to competitiveness and cohesion
To identify innovative solutions to similar problems for which a regional or national approach is not relevant
To valorize Limousin’s potential and know-how and to reinforce its positive image
Specific objectivesTo disseminate the added value of previous interregional cooperation experiences
To stimulate, facilitate and simplify the access to interregional cooperation
To develop transnational partnerships able to apply for targeted European programmes (FP7, CIP, Youth…)
To promote interregional cooperation for the benefit of local stakeholders
4 million euros (app. 3% of the total ERDF budget for 2007-2013)
Different kind of project :
Networks = exchange and dissemination of informations between partners interested in a project => new knowledge and innovative methods
Pilot projects = exchange and transfer of good practices, concentrating on a specific thematic of cooperation => new types of actions
Regional frame operation = capitalisation of good practices within a strategic and operational framework => methodology and tools for transfer
Intensity of Intensity of cooperationcooperation
__
++
Axis 5 = Facilitating partnerships of international and interregional
cooperation
Organization of the Limousin Axis 5 in a nutshell
• Regional Council = Intermediate structure in charge of the management of the Axis 5
• “Rules” fixed in a “Implementation Document” (types of beneficiaries, nature of eligible expenses, selection criterias, maximum ERDF cofunding rate, etc.)
• No calls for proposals
• Mainly “unilateral” cooperation
• The Axis 5 controlled by the DG Regio in 2010
Feedback from Limousin
Added Value Difficulties
-An integrated approach
-A greater flexibility in the implementation and management
-The complementarity with Objective 2 and Objective 3, and sectoral programs (FP7, CIP,...)
-The possibility to finance infrastructure
- A greater proximity to the stakeholders and beneficiaries
-The lack of reciprocity
-A delay in programming
-Because its new, a need to justify the efficient use of the fundings
The INTERACT pilot projectWhat benefits?
A constructive exchange of experiences about the use of article 37.6(b)
A useful introspection on our own practices
A better knowledge of the Regions using article 37.6(b) which helps to identify new potential partners
A chance to promote the cooperation within the mainstream !
Recommendations
For a future 37.6 (b) article
For a good use of the 37.6(b)
- To keep a specific article in the EU regulation
- To allow a flexible approach
- To better communicate about the article
- To preserve the possibility to finance infrastructure
- To increase ERDF cofunding rate
- To be supported by policy-makers
- To have a unique and well identified management office, experienced in managing structural funds and expert in project engineering
- To allow projects with different intensity of cooperation