Top Banner
AgreenSkills – Open Science, Why Not ? Paris, 15 February 2017 Nancy Pontika & Ivo Grigorov on behalf of FP7 FOSTER www.fosteropenscience.eu
16

Open Science, Why not?

Mar 20, 2017

Download

Data & Analytics

Nancy Pontika
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Open Science, Why not?

AgreenSkills – Open Science, Why Not ?

Paris, 15 February 2017 Nancy Pontika & Ivo Grigorov

on behalf of FP7 FOSTER

www.fosteropenscience.eu

Page 2: Open Science, Why not?

Source : Embedding open science practices within evaluation systems can promote research that meets societal needs in developing countries, LSE Impact Blog Jan 2017 http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/. Image credit: 2 by Mundial Perspectives

“ academic impact trumps excellence and relevance together, the cost of which is researchers deviating

from paths they would have followed were the incentive structures different.

If researchers continue to be assessed using such narrow criteria, scientific research

activities will become further dislocated from the needs of the society “

Page 3: Open Science, Why not?

No price provided for the e-version

Page 4: Open Science, Why not?

Open Access Citation Advantagehttp://sparceurope.org/oaca/

Page 6: Open Science, Why not?

Know your way around OA services & tools

http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/index.php Sherpa Romeo

https://doaj.org/

Page 7: Open Science, Why not?

Open Access Policies

http://roarmap.eprints.org/

Page 8: Open Science, Why not?

Source: Houghton, J., Swan, A. & Brown, S. Access to research and technical information in Denmark. (2011) http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/272603

19% of the processes developed would have been delayed or abandoned without access to research

a 2.2 years delay would cost around EUR 5 million per firm in lost sales

Does #OpenScience contribute to Economic Growth?

www.fosteropenscience.eu

Page 9: Open Science, Why not?

“Open Science is applied to optimise reproducibility” Excellence

Impact

Implementation

“data accessibility is unclear!”

“data storage & access not considered”

www.fosteropenscience.eu

“Open Access to scientific knowledge is an essential principle in the project, but there is not enough information on data management or IPR.”

Can #OpenScience win Research Grants?(quotes from EC Evaluators 2014-2017)

Page 10: Open Science, Why not?

“replace research impact indicators beyond the typical bibliometrics and

patenting”

Source: Horizon2020 Societal Challenge 6, WP 2017 “Better integration of evidence on the impact of research and innovation in policy making” https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/topics/co-creation-08-2016-2017.html

Page 11: Open Science, Why not?

“ two out of five studies substantially reproduced

research findings, although not all experiments met thresholds of

statistical significance ”

Nature 541, 19 Jan 2017, doi:10.1038/541269aeLife elifesciences.org/collections/reproducibility-project-cancer-biology

Stanley Flegler/Visuals Unlimited, Inc./Science Photo Library

Page 12: Open Science, Why not?

Benefits of machine readability & TDMhttps://core.ac.uk/

• Improve productivity in the curation of biomedical literature by 50%• Accelerate drug discovery, reducing the 10-12 year average timeframe

from discovery to market• Improves understanding of climate impact in the agro-industry• Helping to predict epidemics

Source: TDM in Public Research, 2016http://adbu.fr/competplug/uploads/2016/12/TDM-in-Public-Research-Revised-15-Dec-16.pdf

Page 13: Open Science, Why not?

Good Luck with

Open Science!Join the Open Science experiment at www.fosteropenscience.eu

@ fosterscience # fosteropenscience

[email protected]

www.fosteropenscience.eu

[email protected]

Page 14: Open Science, Why not?

https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/

Page 15: Open Science, Why not?
Page 16: Open Science, Why not?