Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # 217954 Record of Site Condition Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act Summary Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry. Contents of this Record of Site Condition This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change. Record of Site Condition Number 217954 Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2015/05/07 Certification Date 2014/04/21 Current Property Use Industrial Intended Property Use Commercial Certificate of Property Use Number 0742-9P7G94 Applicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard, with Non-potable Ground Water, Coarse Textured Soil, for Commercial property use, with RA Property Municipal Address 209 WICKSTEED AVENUE, TORONTO, ON, M4G 2C1 1 of 22 Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
75
Embed
Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change ... 217954.pdf · Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # 217954 Record of Site
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # 217954
Record of Site Condition
Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act
Summary
Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence
This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has
access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings
with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental
condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.
Contents of this Record of Site Condition
This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from
the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been
submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.
Record of Site Condition Number 217954Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2015/05/07Certification Date 2014/04/21Current Property Use IndustrialIntended Property Use CommercialCertificate of Property Use Number 0742-9P7G94Applicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard,
with Non-potable Ground Water, CoarseTextured Soil, for Commercial property use, withRA
Property Municipal Address 209 WICKSTEED AVENUE, TORONTO, ON,M4G 2C1
1 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS
Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC
Owner Name WICKSTEED BUSINESS PARK INC.
Authorized Person JACK WINBERG
Mailing Address 170 THE DON WAY, SUITE 307, TORONTOONTARIO, CANADA
2 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
RSC Property Location Information
Municipal Address(es) 209 WICKSTEED AVENUE, TORONTO, ON M4G 2C1
Municipality Toronto
Legal Description See Attached Lawyer’s Letter
Assessment Roll Number(s)
19-06-04-30120-00301-000-03
Property Identifier Number(s)
10369-0178 (LT)
RSC Property Geographical References
Coordinate System UTM
Datum NAD 83
Zone 17
Easting 632,924.00
Northing 4,841,261.00
RSC Property Use Information
The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.
Current Property Use Industrial
Intended Property Use Commercial
Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section 168.6 of the EPA
Yes
Certificate of Property Use Number
0742-9P7G94
3 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC
The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank
4 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONSQualified Person's Information
Name ROBERT W TOSSELL
Type of Membership Under the Professional Geoscientists Act
Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office
District Office Toronto District Office
District Office Address 5775 Yonge St., 8th floor, North York ON M2M 4J1
5 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
Phase One Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing
The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)
(YYYY/MM/DD)
2014-09-12
Type of Report
Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)
Author of Report
Name of ConsultingCompany
P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, 209 Wicksteed Avenue, Toronto, Ontario
2012-07-20 Rachael Colgan & Vico Paloschi
PINCHIN ENVIRONMENTAL LTD.
P1 ESA Update
Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Update, 209 Wicksteed Avenue, Toronto, Ontario
2015-02-06 Heather McLennan & Robert Tossell
PINCHIN LTD.
Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment
2010-11-02 Lindsay Bell, Stephen Spooner & Robert Tossell
Pinchin Environmental Ltd.
Supplemental Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, 209 Wicksteed Avenue, Toronto, Ontario
2011-02-08 Christine Kirchner & Robert Tossell
Pinchin Environmental Ltd.
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, 209 Wicksteed Avenue, Toronto, Ontario
2013-05-01 Corinne Poisson & Robert MacKenzie
Pinchin Environmental Ltd.
Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment, Part 1 of 209 Wicksteed Avenue, Toronto, Ontario
2013-06-06 Corinne Poisson, Stephen Spooner, Robert Tossell & Vico Paloschi
Pinchin Environmental Ltd.
6 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing
The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)
(YYYY/MM/DD)
2014-04-21
Type of Report
Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)
Author of Report
Name of ConsultingCompany
P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment, 209 Wicksteed Avenue, Toronto, Ontario
2012-07-20 Rachael Colgan, Stephen Spooner & Robert MacKenzie
PINCHIN ENVIRONMENTAL LTD.
P2 ESA Update
Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Update, 209 Wicksteed Avenue, Toronto, Ontario
2015-02-06 Heather McLennan & Robert Tossell
PINCHIN LTD.
Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment
Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD).
Author of Report
Name of ConsultingCompany
Site Remediation, 209 Wicksteed Avenue, Toronto, Ontario 2006-09-19 Eleni Girma Toronto Inspection Ltd.
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment of 209 Wicksteed Avenue, Toronto, Ontario
2010-03-09 Jenise Lee & Derek J. Maat
Maat Environmental Engineering Corp.
Impact Delineation, 209 Wicksteed Avenue, Toronto, Ontario 2010-03-17 Derek J. Maat Maat Environmental Engineering Corp.
Soil Sampling Program, 209 Wicksteed Avenue, Toronto, Ontario 2010-07-20 Sarah Ferguson, Mark Cormack & Robert Tossell
Pinchin Environmental Ltd.
Remedial Excavation and Verification Soil Sampling, 209 Wicksteed Avenue,Toronto, Ontario
2010-11-02 Lindsay Bell, Stephen Spooner & Robert Tossell
Pinchin Environmental Ltd.
Supplemental Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, 209 Wicksteed Avenue, Toronto, Ontario
2011-02-08 Christine Kirchner & Robert Tossell
Pinchin Environmental Ltd.
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 2013-05-01 Corinne Poisson & Robert Mackenzie
Pinchin Environmental Ltd.
Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment, Part 1 of 209 Wicksteed Avenue, Toronto, Ontario
2013-06-06 Corinne Poisson, Stephen Spooner, Robert Tossell & Vico Paloschi
Pinchin Environmental Ltd.
7 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
Environmental ConditionSection 41 applies? No
Section 43.1 applies? No
Site Condition InformationCertification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2014/04/21
Total area of RSC property (in hectares) 0.10000
Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property
Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property
Soil Texture Coarse
Assessment/Restoration Approach Full Depth Generic
Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Yes
Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04?
Yes
Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under the property which is used in the RSC?
Yes
Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or sediment
MAXXAM ANALYTICS INC.
Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Non-potable
Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 3
Local or single-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2015/02/03
Risk Assessment InformationA risk assessment has been prepared and accepted by the Director in support of this RSC?
Yes
Risk assessment identification number 4822-998LE2
Risk assessment was a site specific risk assessment completed and approved in accordance with the Cleanup Guideline 1996?
Yes
8 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
1 Boron (Hot Water Soluble)* 1.1 2 µg/g
2 Chromium VI < 0.2 8 µg/g
3 Cyanide (CN-) 0.02 0.051 µg/g
4 Electrical Conductivity 0.83 1.4 mS/cm
5 Mercury < 0.05 3.9 µg/g
6 Sodium Adsorption Ratio 8.2 12
7 Acetone < 0.5 16 µg/g
8 Bromomethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
9 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.05 0.21 µg/g
10 Chlorobenzene < 0.05 2.4 µg/g
11 Chloroform < 0.05 0.47 µg/g
12 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.05 6.8 µg/g
13 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < 0.05 9.6 µg/g
14 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < 0.05 0.2 µg/g
15 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.05 16 µg/g
16 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.05 17 µg/g
17 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
18 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.05 0.064 µg/g
19 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.05 55 µg/g
20 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.05 1.3 µg/g
21 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.16 µg/g
22 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.05 0.18 µg/g
23 Ethylene dibromide < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
24 Hexane (n) < 0.05 46 µg/g
25 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 0.5 70 µg/g
26 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 0.5 31 µg/g
27 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.05 11 µg/g
28 Methylene Chloride 0.054 1.6 µg/g
29 Styrene < 0.05 34 µg/g
30 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.05 0.087 µg/g
31 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
32 Tetrachloroethylene 0.079 4.5 µg/g
33 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.05 6.1 µg/g
34 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
35 Trichloroethylene 0.38 0.91 µg/g
...Continued on next page
9 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil
Continued from previous page....
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
36 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.05 4 µg/g
37 Vinyl Chloride < 0.02 0.032 µg/g
38 Bromodichloromethane < 0.05 18 µg/g
39 Bromoform < 0.05 0.61 µg/g
40 Dibromochloromethane < 0.05 13 µg/g
41 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 0.02 55 µg/g
42 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 0.02 230 µg/g
43 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 < 0.02 1700 µg/g
44 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < 0.04 3300 µg/g
45 Acenaphthene < 0.01 96 µg/g
46 Acenaphthylene < 0.005 0.15 µg/g
47 Anthracene 0.009 0.67 µg/g
48 Benz[a]anthracene < 0.02 0.96 µg/g
49 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.017 0.3 µg/g
50 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.014 0.96 µg/g
51 Benzo[ghi]perylene < 0.02 9.6 µg/g
52 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.01 0.96 µg/g
53 Chrysene 0.02 9.6 µg/g
54 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.02 0.1 µg/g
55 Fluoranthene 0.031 9.6 µg/g
56 Fluorene < 0.005 62 µg/g
57 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < 0.02 0.76 µg/g
58 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** 0.015 76 µg/g
59 Naphthalene 0.009 9.6 µg/g
60 Phenanthrene 0.043 12 µg/g
61 Pyrene 0.045 96 µg/g
62 Arsenic 3 18 µg/g
63 Selenium < 0.5 5.5 µg/g
64 Barium 190 670 µg/g
65 Beryllium 0.66 8 µg/g
66 Boron (total) 6.8 120 µg/g
67 Chromium Total 36 160 µg/g
68 Cobalt 8.1 80 µg/g
69 Molybdenum < 0.5 40 µg/g
70 Nickel 54 270 µg/g
...Continued on next page
10 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil
Continued from previous page....
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
71 Silver 4.1 40 µg/g
72 Thallium 0.12 3.3 µg/g
73 Uranium 0.56 33 µg/g
74 Vanadium 26 86 µg/g
75 Benzene < 0.02 0.32 µg/g
76 Ethylbenzene < 0.02 9.5 µg/g
77 Toluene < 0.02 68 µg/g
78 Xylene Mixture < 0.04 26 µg/g
11 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)
Ground Water
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
1 Chloride 120,000 2300000 µg/L
2 Chromium VI < 5 140 µg/L
3 Cyanide (CN-) < 2 66 µg/L
4 Mercury < 0.1 0.29 µg/L
5 Acetone 44 130000 µg/L
6 Bromomethane < 0.5 5.6 µg/L
7 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 0.79 µg/L
8 Chlorobenzene < 0.2 630 µg/L
9 Chloroform < 0.2 2.4 µg/L
10 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.5 4600 µg/L
11 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < 0.5 9600 µg/L
12 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < 0.5 8 µg/L
13 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 1 4400 µg/L
14 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.2 320 µg/L
15 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L
16 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.2 1.6 µg/L
17 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L
18 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L
19 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.2 16 µg/L
20 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.5 5.2 µg/L
21 Ethylene dibromide < 0.2 0.25 µg/L
22 Hexane (n) < 1 51 µg/L
23 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 5 470000 µg/L
24 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 5 140000 µg/L
25 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.5 190 µg/L
26 Methylene Chloride < 2 610 µg/L
27 Styrene < 0.5 1300 µg/L
28 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.5 3.3 µg/L
29 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.5 3.2 µg/L
30 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.2 640 µg/L
31 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.5 4.7 µg/L
32 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.6 2500 µg/L
33 Vinyl Chloride < 0.2 0.5 µg/L
34 Bromodichloromethane < 1 85000 µg/L
35 Bromoform < 1 380 µg/L
...Continued on next page
12 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)
Ground Water
Continued from previous page....
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
36 Dibromochloromethane < 0.5 82000 µg/L
37 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 100 750 µg/L
38 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 100 150 µg/L
39 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 < 100 500 µg/L
40 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < 100 500 µg/L
41 Acenaphthene < 0.05 600 µg/L
42 Acenaphthylene < 0.05 1.8 µg/L
43 Anthracene < 0.05 2.4 µg/L
44 Benz[a]anthracene < 0.05 4.7 µg/L
45 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.01 0.81 µg/L
46 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.75 µg/L
47 Benzo[ghi]perylene < 0.1 0.2 µg/L
48 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.4 µg/L
49 Chrysene < 0.05 1 µg/L
50 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.1 0.52 µg/L
51 Fluoranthene < 0.05 130 µg/L
52 Fluorene < 0.05 400 µg/L
53 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < 0.1 0.2 µg/L
54 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < 0.05 1800 µg/L
55 Naphthalene 0.14 1400 µg/L
56 Phenanthrene 0.08 580 µg/L
57 Pyrene < 0.05 68 µg/L
58 Sodium 60,000 2300000 µg/L
59 Antimony 2.4 20000 µg/L
60 Arsenic 1 1900 µg/L
61 Selenium 17 63 µg/L
62 Barium 120 29000 µg/L
63 Beryllium < 0.5 67 µg/L
64 Boron (total) 2,100 45000 µg/L
65 Cadmium < 0.1 2.7 µg/L
66 Chromium Total < 5 810 µg/L
67 Cobalt 1.2 66 µg/L
68 Copper 1.6 87 µg/L
69 Lead < 0.5 25 µg/L
70 Molybdenum 14 9200 µg/L
...Continued on next page
13 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)
Ground Water
Continued from previous page....
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
71 Nickel 2 490 µg/L
72 Silver < 0.1 1.5 µg/L
73 Thallium 0.13 510 µg/L
74 Uranium 0.55 420 µg/L
75 Vanadium 2 250 µg/L
76 Zinc 26 1100 µg/L
77 Benzene 0.5 44 µg/L
78 Ethylbenzene < 0.2 2300 µg/L
79 Toluene 0.43 18000 µg/L
80 Xylene Mixture 0.26 4200 µg/L
14 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
See the attached “Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment” for standards specified in a risk assessment and comparison to maximum
concentrations measured on, in or under the RSC property.
The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank
15 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
Remedial Action and Mitigation
Remediated Soils
Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.
Soil Remediation Process Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)
Description of Remediation
Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property.
Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned
Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.
Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0
Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0
Soil Brought to the Property
Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.
Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property(in-ground volume in m³)
0.0
16 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures
Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing.
Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date.
Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.
Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres)
17 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures
Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.
None
Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.
Installation of a hard cap or fill/soil cap barrier
Monitoring or Maintenance
Soil Management Measures
Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.
Monitor and maintain hard cap barrier as per CPU
Ground Water Management Measures
Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.
Not applicable
Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary
Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation?
No
18 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
Qualified Person’s Statements and CertificationsAs the qualified person, I certify that:
A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.
As of 2014/04/21, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC.
Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition, given written notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the clerk of the local municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier municipality in which the property is located.
As of 2014/04/21, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 37 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment.
As of 2014/04/21, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards.
In relation to any contaminant excepted from the certification mentioned above as specified in the RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment, or in relation to any other contaminant that in my opinion is likely to cause an adverse effect:
A risk assessment was prepared for the contaminant with respect to the property for which the phase two environmental site assessment was conducted.
The Director has accepted the risk assessment under clause 168.5 (1) (a) of the Act.
As of 2014/04/21, the property for which the phase two environmental site assessment was conducted meets the standards specified in the risk assessment for the contaminant.
I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.
I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.
I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry.
The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.
I do not hold and have not held and my employer PINCHIN LTD.does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessmentor risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based
To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSCare true as of 2014/04/21.
By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.
By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, ROBERT W TOSSELL, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/04/30:
19 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, ROBERT W TOSSELL, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/04/30:
a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.
I Agree
20 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or AgentThe following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Changeas part of the record of site condition
Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner
Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property
Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired
A Current plan of Survey
Property Specific Standards
Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern
Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property
Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model
Owner or agent certification statements
6.1.2
21 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
22 of 22Filed Record of Site Condition # 217954 on 2015/05/07
Request ID: 017579120 Province of Ontario Date Report Produced: 2015/04/30Demande n° : Province de l'Ontario Document produit le :Transaction ID: 57472368 Ministry of Government Services Time Report Produced: 11:17:37Transaction n° : Ministère des Services gouvernementaux Imprimé à :Category ID: CTCatégorie :
CERTIFICATE OF STATUSATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE
This is to certify that according to the D'après les dossiers du Ministère desrecords of the Ministry of Government Services gouvernementaux, nous attestonsServices que la société
W I C K S T E E D B U S I N E S S P A R K I N C .
Ontario Corporation Number Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario)
0 0 2 3 2 7 3 4 5
is a corporation incorporated, est une société constituée, prorogée ou néeamalgamated or continued under d'une fusion aux termes des lois de lathe laws of the Province of Ontario. Province de l'Ontario.
The corporation came into existence on La société a été fondée le
M A Y 0 8 M A I , 2 0 1 2
and has not been dissolved. et n'est pas dissoute.
Dated Fait le
A P R I L 3 0 A V R I L , 2 0 1 5
DirectorDirecteur
The issuance of this certifcate in electronic form is authorized by the Ministry of Government Services.
La délivrance du présent certificat sous forme électronique est autorisée par le Ministère des Services gouvernementaux.
Re: Wicksteed Business Park Inc. - Record of Site Condition
We are the solicitors for Wicksteed Business Park Inc. in the above-referenced matter.
We further wish to confirm as follows:
1. Wicksteed Business Park Inc. is the registered owner, in fee simple and the developer of
the lands which are the subject of the Record of Site Condition.
2. The legal description of the lands which are the subject of the Record of Site Condition is
as follows:
Part of West Half of Lot 9, Concession 3, From the Bay, Twp. Of York, and Part
of Lot 10, Concession 3, From the Bay, Twp. Of York, designated as Part 1 on
Plan 66R-26854, City of Toronto, being Part of PIN 10369-0178 (LT).
3. The municipal address of the lands is as follows:
209 Wicksteed Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4G 2C1.
Table 2: Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment Number: RA1322-13
1 of 1
Table 2: Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment Number RA1322-13Applicable Site Condition Standard Table 3
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in SoilContaminant Measurement type Measured Concentration Standard Specified in Risk Assessment Unit of Measurement Antimony Measured 49 58.8 ug/g Cadmium Measured 92 110.4 ug/g Copper Measured 1700 2040 ug/g Lead Measured 430 516 ug/g Zinc Measured 700 840 ug/g
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Ground WaterContaminant Measurement type Measured Concentration Standard Specified in Risk Assessment Unit of Measurement Tetrachloroethylene Measured 9.8 11.76 ug/L Trichloroethylene Measured 1.7 2.04 ug/L Vinyl Chloride < MDL Value of 0.2 1.8 ug/L
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in SedimentContaminant Measurement type Measured Concentration Standard Specified in Risk Assessment Unit of Measurement <none>
TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN – PART 1
Area of Potential Environmental Concern
Location of Area of Potential Environmental Concern on
Phase One Property
Potentially Contaminating
Activity
Location of PCA (on-site or off-site)
Contaminants of Potential Concern
Media Potentially Impacted (Ground water, soil and/or
sediment)
APEC #1 (Rail Line) Western Portion of Phase One Property
Item 46 – Rail Yards, Tracks and Spurs On-Site
Metals and Inorganics PHCs PAHs
Soil and Groundwater
APEC #2 (Poor-quality Fill Material)
Entire Phase One Property Item 30 – Importation of Fill Material of Unknown
Quality On-Site
Metals and Inorganics PHCs PAHs
Soil and Groundwater
APEC #3 (Historical Fire)
Majority of Phase One Property Fire at Former Site Building On-Site PAHs Soil and Groundwater
APEC #4 (VOC-impacted Groundwater in
Part 1 of 209 Wicksteed)
West-central Portion of Phase One Property Adjacent to Part 1 of 209 Wicksteed Avenue
Not Applicable (spill identified by previous
consultant) On-Site VOCs Groundwater
TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY
Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use Property Use Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire Insurance Plans, etc.
Lot 9
1836 William W. Baldwin Assumed agricultural Agricultural or
other use
1836 – 1849 James Taylor Assumed agricultural Agricultural or other use
1849 – 1887 Thomas B. Taylor Assumed agricultural Agricultural or
other use
1887 – 1888 Henrietta V. Taylor Assumed agricultural Agricultural or other use
1888 – 1913 Robert Davies Assumed agricultural Agricultural or
other use
1913 – 1949 Canadian Northern Ontario Railway Company No documented land use / Assumed Agricultural or
1939 aerial photograph indicates vacant undeveloped land that
(Part of Lot 9) to be vacant undeveloped land. other use appears to be traversed by a roadway.
1913 - 1942 Canadian Northern Ontario Railway Company No documented land use / Assumed Agricultural or (Part of Lot 9) to be vacant undeveloped land. other use
1942 Thorndale Securities Company Limited (Part of No documented land use / Assumed Agricultural or
Lot 9) to be vacant undeveloped land. other use
1942 – 1948 Trustees of John Curry (Part of Lot 9) No documented land use / Assumed Agricultural or 1947 aerial photograph indicates vacant undeveloped land with an to be vacant undeveloped land. other use apparent roadway located on western portion of the Phase One
property.
1948 – 1949 Joseph Tanenbaum, Max Tanenbaum & No documented land use / Assumed Agricultural or Runnymede Iron and Steel Company (Part of Lot 9)
to be vacant undeveloped land. other use
Lot 10
Prior to 1843 Crown Assumed agricultural Agricultural or
other use 1843 – 1844 John Peter Carey Assumed agricultural Agricultural or
other use 1844 Thomas Elliott Assumed agricultural Agricultural or
other use 1844 – 1846 William Hill Assumed agricultural Agricultural or
other use 1846 – 1862 Jacob Snider Assumed agricultural Agricultural or
other use 1862 – 1864 Charles Snider Assumed agricultural Agricultural or
other use 1864 – 1881 John Taylor, Thomas Taylor and George Taylor Assumed agricultural Agricultural or
other use
1881 – 1907 John H. Taylor Assumed agricultural Agricultural or other use
1907 – 1912 Matilda M. E. Taylor Assumed agricultural Agricultural or other use
1912 – 1917 Frederick Grundy Assumed agricultural Agricultural or other use
1917 – 1920 Sterling Trust Corporation Assumed agricultural Agricultural or other use
1920 Matilda M. E. Taylor Assumed agricultural Agricultural or other use
1920 – 1946 George D. Forbes (Part of Lot 10) Assumed agricultural Agricultural or
other use
1939 aerial photograph indicates vacant undeveloped land that appears to be traversed by a roadway.
1946 – 1949 Treuhaft Manufacturing Limited (Part of Lot
No documented land use / Assumed Agricultural or 10) to be vacant undeveloped land. other use
1920 – 1942 George D. Forbes (Part of Lot 10) Assumed agricultural Agricultural or 1942 – 1947 Dominion of Canada Expropriation Plan 3080 – No documented land use / Assumed Agricultural or
Department of Munitions & Supply (Part of Lot to be vacant undeveloped land. 10)
other use
1947 James R. Thompson (Part of Lot 10) No documented land use / Assumed Agricultural or
1947 aerial photograph indicates vacant undeveloped land with an to be vacant undeveloped land. other use apparent roadway located on western portion of the Phase One
property.
1947 James W. Carrick and Thomas M. Weatherhead No documented land use / Assumed Agricultural or (Part of Lot 10) to be vacant undeveloped land. other use
1947 – 1948 Malvern Construction Company Limited (Part
No documented land use / Assumed Agricultural or
of Lot 10) to be vacant undeveloped land. other use 1948 – 1949 Pilkey-Noble Construction Company Limited No documented land use / Assumed Agricultural or
(Part of Lot 10) to be vacant undeveloped land. other use
TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY
Year
Name of Owner
Description of Property Use
Property Use
Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire Insurance Plans, etc.
Lots 9 and 10
1949 Pilkey Noble Construction Company Limited
No documented land use / Assumed to be vacant undeveloped land.
Agricultural or other use
1949 – 1962 Lake Simcoe Ice & Fuel Limited
Frozen food storage and warehousing
Industrial The roadway observed in the 1947 aerial photograph is not apparent in an aerial photograph dated 1950. A rail line located on the western portion of the Phase One property (APEC #1) is visible in aerial photographs dated 1957 and 1960.
1962 – 1983 Lake Simcoe Ice & Enterprises Limited
Frozen food storage and warehousing
Industrial Phase One property occupied by Lake Simcoe Ice & Enterprises Ltd. and Singer’s Foods Ltd. ca. 1965-1980 based on street directories.
1983 – 1996 Lake Simcoe Enterprises Limited
Frozen food storage and warehousing
Industrial Phase One property occupied by Lake Simcoe Ice & Enterprises Ltd. and Agincourt Foods Inc. ca. 1985-1990 based on street directories.
1996 – 2006 1198177 Ontario Inc.
Frozen food storage and warehousing
Industrial Phase One property occupied by Lake Simcoe Enterprises Ltd., Agincourt Foods Inc., Excel Cleaning & Sup Serv. Ltd. and Laurada Industries Inc. ca. 1990-2002 based on street directories. A 2002 aerial photograph indicates the rail line (APEC #1) had been removed.
2006 – 2010 2112264 Ontario Inc.
Frozen food storage and warehousing to 2007 / Vacant land from 2007 to 2010
Industrial Site Building demolished following fire in 2007 (APEC #3).
2010 - 2013 R. E. Real Estate Ltd.
Vacant land Industrial
2013 – 2014
Wicksteed Business Park II Inc.
Vacant land Industrial
2014 – Present
Wicksteed Business Park Inc.
Vacant land Industrial
2470 MILLTOWER COURT, MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO L5N 7W5 PHONE: (905) 363-0678 FAX: (905) 363-0681 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY MANAGEMENT SERVICES FROM OFFICES ACROSS CANADA
www.pinchin.com 1-888-767-3330
Phase Two Conceptual Site Model
The updated Phase One Conceptual Site Model (CSM) included in this letter provided a detailed
visualization of the APECs which could occur on, in, under, or affecting the Phase Two property. The
Phase One CSM also presented the potential contaminants of concern (PCOCs), descriptions of
underground utilities, and available site-specific hydrogeological information. Furthermore, the Phase
One CSM illustrated the potential exposure pathways and receptors that Pinchin had identified to
potentially exist on the Phase One property. The Phase One CSM is summarized in Figures 3 through 6.
The following sections expand on the Phase One CSM with information collected during the completion of
the 2013 Phase Two ESA and 2013 Phase II ESA.
The Phase Two property is currently undeveloped, vacant land zoned for commercial land use and is
located within the City of Toronto on the south side of Wicksteed Avenue, east of Leslie Street (see
Figure 1). The Phase Two CSM is described in the following sections and illustrated in the attached
Figures 1 to 16.
Potentially Contaminating Activities
Two potentially contaminating activities (PCAs) as defined by Ontario Regulation (O.Reg.) 153/04 have
been documented to have occurred on the Phase Two property as follows:
Item 30 – Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Origin:
Sand, with occasional topsoil inclusions and brick and woodchip debris, is
present to a maximum depth of approximately 1.5 mbgs. The origin of this fill
material is unknown.
Item 46 – Rail Yards, Tracks and Spurs:
An historical railway spur (based on historical information) oriented generally
north-south was located on the western portion of the Phase Two property from
between 1950 and 1959 to between 1992 and 2002. No evidence of the railway
spur was noted at the time of the Phase One ESA.
In addition, a fire that resulted in the demolition of the former Site Building was considered a PCA for the
Phase Two property.
The presence of volatile organic compound (VOC) impacted groundwater was considered to represent an