One Laptop per Child (OLPC) in Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands Reflections from Four Site Visits Dr Laura Hosman Illinois Institute of Technology PTC 2011, January 18, 2011
One Laptop per Child (OLPC) in Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands
Reflections from Four Site Visits
Dr Laura HosmanIllinois Institute of TechnologyPTC 2011, January 18, 2011
Four Schools / Many Findings
• Overview of the four schools: – PNG: Mt Hagen and Rumginae– Solomon Islands: Patukae and Batuna
• Findings• Questions & Challenges• Recommendations
School 1: PNG Mt Hagen
• Brand New Deployment—1st week• Teachers had never used computers• 1-week training session
School 1: PNG Mt Hagen
• Each school had a pre-loaded server• Individual solar panels to charge XOs• 3rd-5th grades covered (1/2 of school, plans for other 1/2)
School 1: PNG Mt Hagen
• Too soon to talk about impact
• Students & Teachers both excited, enthusiastic
School 1: PNG Mt Hagen
School 2: PNG Kiunga/Rumginae
• Rumginae school 1st pilot in region• Had laptops for ~6 months• 2-day training session
School 2: PNG Kiunga/Rumginae
• Chosen b/c grid electricity• Only grades 3-4 have laptops
• Cause for divisiveness/disagreement
School 2: PNG Kiunga/Rumginae
Questions arose:Who gets left out? Who gets priority?
School 2: PNG Kiunga/Rumginae
School 3: Solomon Islands Patukae
• One of first pilots: Have had XOs for 2 years• Have satellite Internet thru PPP, but no server
School 3: Solomon Islands Patukae
• All grades received laptops• Children seemed very familiar w/them
School 3: Solomon Islands Patukae
• Teachers very enthusiastic• Parents even more supportive!
School 3: Solomon Islands Patukae
• Entire community changed thru project• Challenge: Program in danger of being
abandoned by Solomons Dept of Ed.
School 4: Solomons Batuna
• Have had XOs for 2 years, Tech. School• Used to have Internet—hadn’t for 4 mo.
School 4: Solomons Batuna
• Creative use of XOs very evident• Local technical expert on-site
School 4: Solomons Batuna
School 4: Solomons Batuna• Teachers & Parents very supportive
Preliminary Findings
• At every school: – Teachers want more training– Teachers & students with laptops
universally positive about the program– Electricity/energy in short supply– No clear financial plan for maintenance,
replacement or repair of XOs, or for providing new XOs to incoming classes
Preliminary Findings II
• Each school had unique challenges– Rivalry/jealousy/resentment of “have-nots”– Teachers/Principal had left, taking XOs with
them– Internet Connectivity
• In PNG prospects for getting it weren’t good• In Batuna the repeater was destroyed
– Program abandonment– Desire for local content
OLPC’s Five Principles
• Child Ownership• Low Ages• Saturation• Connection• Free & Open Source
When the core principles can’t be met, which get sacrificed?
Questions and Challenges
• When dreaming up “development” technology solutions in a “developed” environment, it’s nearly impossible to comprehend all that we take for granted
• When bringing technology to places that didn’t have it before and don’t have all the complementarities associated with it, what do we prioritize? What gets sacrificed?
Questions and Challenges
• Is it better to give laptops to a few grades, and neglect the others?
• Or is it better not to deploy if you know you can’t reach all children?
• Or if you know the laptops won’t be replaced or given to future classes?
• What to do about local content?
Not all Gloom and Doom: Profound Social Impact
• Parents conveyed impact on kids, families, schools, communities, etc.
• Unquestionably, lives have been changed• Technology affects aspirations, outlook, realities
Not Answers…but Recommendations
• Try for saturation• Think of energy• Try to develop local content• Think of the future!
– Maintenance– Replacement – Provision for future years– Computer lab or local cyber-learning center, – Continual teacher training
Thank You!
[email protected]://ict4dviewsfromthefield.wordpress.com