Page 1
Older people’s experience of falls: understanding, interpretation and
autonomy
Brenda Roe, Fiona Howell, Konstantinos Riniotis, Roger Beech, Peter Crome & Bie Nio Ong
Accepted for publication 7 May 2008
Correspondence to B. Roe:
e-mail: [email protected]
Brenda Roe PhD RN RHV
Professor of Health Research
Evidence-based Practice Research Centre,
Faculty of Health, Edge Hill University,
Ormskirk, UK
Fiona Howell MA RN RHV
Lecturer in Nursing
School of Nursing and Midwifery,
Keele University, UK
Konstantinos Riniotis MSc
Consultant Physician in Medicine
Inverclyde Royal Hospital, Greenock, UK
Roger Beech BSc PhD
Reader Health Services Research
Centre for Health Planning and
Management, Keele University, UK;
Academic Lead for Research
Central and Eastern Cheshire Primary Care
Trust, UK
Peter Crome PhD MD FRCP FFPM
Professor of Geriatric Medicine
School of Medicine, Keele University, UK;
President of the British Geriatrics Society UK
Bie Nio Ong BA BEd MA PhD
Professor of Health Services Research
Institute of Primary Care and Health
Sciences, Keele University, UK;
Chair of Central and Eastern Cheshire
Primary Care Trust UK
ROE BROE B., HOWELL F. , RINIOTIS K. , BEECH R., CROME P. & ONG B.N. (2008)HOWELL F. , RINIOTIS K. , BEECH R., CROME P. & ONG B.N. (2008)
Older people’s experience of falls: understanding, interpretation and autonomy.
Journal of Advanced Nursing 63(6), 586–596
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04735.x
AbstractTitle. Older people’s experience of falls: understanding, interpretation and autonomy.
Aim. This paper is a report of a study to explore the experiences of older people who
suffered a recent fall and identify possible factors that could contribute to service
development.
Background. Falls in older people are prevalent and are associated with morbidity,
hospitalization and mortality, personal costs to individuals and financial costs to
health services.
Method. A convenience sample of 27 older people (mean age 84 years; range 65–98)
participated in semi-structured taped interviews. Follow-up interviews during 2003–
2004 were undertaken to detect changes over time. Data were collected about expe-
rience of the fall, use of services, health and well-being, activities of daily living,
informal care, support networks and prevention. Thematic content analysis was
undertaken.
Findings. Twenty-seven initial interviews and 18 follow-up interviews were con-
ducted. The majority of people fell indoors (n = 23) and were alone (n = 15). The
majority of falls were repeat falls (n = 22) and five were a first-ever fall. People who
reflected on their fall and sought to understand why and how it occurred developed
strategies to prevent future falls, face their fear, maintain control and choice and
continue with activities of daily living. Those who did not reflect on their fall and did
not know why it occurred restricted their activities and environments and remained in
fear of falling.
Conclusion. Assisting people to reflect on their falls and to understand why they
happened could help with preventing future falls, allay fear, boost confidence and aid
rehabilitation relating to their activities of daily living.
Keywords: autonomy, experiences, falls, interviews, nursing, older people, social
perspectives, understanding
Introduction
Falls and falling are common occurrences with increasing age
(Tinetti et al. 1998). Older people are particularly likely to
fall, and this can result in severe cases in injury, fractures,
hospitalization and premature death (Rawsky 1998, Cryer &
Patel 2001). Other consequences are repeat falls, fear of
falling, impaired mobility, loss of independence, social
ORIGINAL RESEARCHJAN
586 � 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Page 2
isolation and significant costs to individuals, their families
and public services (Gryfe et al. 1977, Morse et al. 1987,
O’Loughlin et al. 1993, Rawsky 1998, Cryer & Patel 2001,
Tinetti 2003). Awareness of the costs and implications of falls
in recent years has made falls prevention an important policy
internationally for health and social services to address
supported by initiatives in the voluntary sector (DH 2003,
2004, Todd & Skelton 2004). There has been little research
investigating the consequences of falls from the perspectives
of older people and their families. In this paper, we report the
findings from qualitative research investigating older people’s
experiences of recent falls to analyse their understanding of
thee falls, and their autonomy. These findings could serve as
the basis for service and practice development.
Background
Up to a third of older people aged 65 years and above living
in the community in the USA will fall each year resulting in
injury, hospitalization or death (Tinetti et al. 1998, Tinetti
2003). Falls are associated with chronic conditions (Lee et al.
2006) and the likelihood of falling increases with age with
one in two people aged 80 years and over likely to have a fall
(Blake et al. 1988, O’Loughlin et al. 1993, Tinetti et al.
1998). Women are more likely than men to fall (O’Loughlin
et al. 1993, Yasamura et al. 1994) and, having fallen, one in
three older people will fall again within the following year
(Gryfe et al. 1977, O’Loughlin et al. 1993, Luukinen et al.
1994, Tinetti et al. 1998). Attendance at accident and
emergency departments, hospitalization, admission to long-
term care and death are consequences of falls in people aged
65 years and over (Morse et al. 1987, Rawsky 1998, Cryer &
Patel 2001, Tinetti 2003, Todd & Skelton 2004). In the
United Kingdom (UK), the costs of falls to health and social
services are estimated at £908Æ9 m (NICE 2004), while in the
United States of America (USA) the estimate in 1994 was as
high as $20Æ2 bn (Englander et al. 1996).
Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of
interventions to prevent falls conclude that multi-factorial
risk assessment and individualized home-based exercises
targeted at those most at risk are effective in fall prevention
(Gillespie et al. 2003, Chang et al. 2004). Loss of confidence
and fear of falling are notable consequences of having fallen
(Tinetti 2003).
Studies of older people’s views and experience of falls are
limited (Salkeld et al. 2000, HEBS 2001, Horton 2002).
Kingston (2000) investigated falls in older people and
discussed them in the context of metaphor, status passage
and preferred identities. Little qualitative research has been
undertaken to investigate the social perspectives, meaning and
impact of falls in older people. Horton (2007) has undertaken
a grounded theory study of falls in older men and women and
concluded that the social construction of the risk of falling and
actions were gendered. Parrticipants had gendered ways of
talking about risk and identifying risk factors for falling. Men
viewed themselves as ‘responsible’ and ‘rational’ and expected
to reduce their own risk of falling, while older women had a
tendency to blame themselves or others for falls. These
differing perceptions influenced their actions to prevent future
falls. Horton (2002) also found that the gender of the older
person and their key family member influenced actions, with a
power imbalance between men and women resulting in
younger male family members undertaking protective and
coercive actions with older female relatives who fell. When
younger female family members with older males fell, this
resulted in daughters undertaking negotiating and engaging
actions, and this was similar with younger female relatives
and older women that fell.
The study
Aim
The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of older
people who had a recent fall and identify possible factors that
contribute to future service development.
Design
A qualitative research using semi-structured interviews with
prompts was conducted in two primary care trusts (PCTs –
primary care provider organizations) during 2003–2004.
Initial interviews were followed up with a second interview
within 3–4 months. A recent fall was defined as being within
the last 10 days and classified as a new (first ever) or repeat
fall (having experienced a previous fall or falls) in people aged
65 years and above.
Settings
The settings were two primary care trusts in the North-west
of England. One was rural, with a spread of towns and
urban locations and having an established falls prevention
programme and community hospital clinic (PCT 1). The
other was in an urban setting, with merged towns and rural
areas radiating outward and having a less-established falls
prevention service and a falls clinic in a hospital setting
(PCT 2). Selection and categorization of these PCTs was
based on previous research findings, documentation on
structure and configuration of services and dates of
JAN: ORIGINAL RESEARCH Older people’s experience of falls
� 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 587
Page 3
establishment to reflect a range of falls services and
geographical settings.
Participants
The sample was one of convenience and comprised 27 older
people who had had a recent fall (n = 26 within the last
10 days, n = 1 within 16 days) being interviewed (12 PCT 1;
15 PCT 2). A 100% and 94% response rates were achieved
for PCT 1 and PCT 2, respectively; in the latter a man was
going to stay with his brother and was reluctant to partic-
ipate. More women than men were interviewed (22 vs. 5;
PCT – 1 0 men, 12 women; mean age 87 years, age range 65–
98 years; PCT 2–5 men, 10 women; mean age 81 years age
71–94 years). Across the sample their ages ranged from 65 to
98 years of age with the mean age of those in PCT 1 being
older (mean age 87 years) than those interviewed in PCT 2
(mean age 81 years).
Data collection
Participants were recruited via accident and emergency
departments, ambulance services, community health services,
intermediate care services and day centres. Interviews were
conducted either at home, in hospital, or nursing home in a
place that ensured privacy (by KR PCT 1 and FH PCT 2) and
were tape recorded. Data were collected on participants’
experiences of the fall, use of services, health and well-being,
activities of daily living, informal care and support networks
and prevention using an indicative interview guide and
prompts. A follow-up interview was undertaken 3–4 months
later and to collect information on similar themes to detect
any differences or changes over time and the occurrence of
repeat falls.
The first three interviews in each location were classed as
pilot work to test the feasibility of recruitment and opera-
tional definitions. Recruiting participants within 7 days of a
fall proved difficult and so the operational definition was
modified to become within 10 days of having fall. No
changes were made to the methods of recruitment or the
semi-structured interview schedule and so the data were
retained in the main data set.
Data analysis
Tapes were transcribed following each interview and ‘edited’
as a true record with line identification for interviewers and
participants. All transcripts were anonymous. Content anal-
ysis was undertaken and themes and categories arising from
the data reaching saturation identified independently by three
members of the team (one member for transcripts from each
PCT, KR and FH, and one member across all transcripts) and
agreed by discussion and consensus.
Rigour
Reliability checks were undertaken on the themes and cate-
gories derived within a selection of complete interviews and
across themes by two members of the team with a high level of
agreement; minor differences were eliminated by discussion to
reach consensus. The validity of information was verified and
clarified with each participant during interview.
Ethical considerations
This study was approved by the appropriate health service
ethics committee. Informed consent was obtained prior to
initial interviews. Assurance was given that data would
anonymized and kept confidential.
Findings
Participants
Twenty-seven people were interviewed following their recent
fall, with those from PCT 1 all women and having a higher
mean age than participants interviewed in PCT 2 (Table 1).
Eighteen follow-up interviews were conducted 3–4 months
later (PCT 1 n = 8; PCT n = 10) and the mean age difference
remained, with those from PCT 1 being slightly older than
those in PCT 2. Participants were lost to follow-up because of
being unwell (n = 5), having died (n = 2) or being lost to
contact, suggesting re-location (n = 2). Initial interviews were
undertaken with more than half of the participants in PCT 1
in hospital (n = 7), three in nursing homes and two at home.
In PCT 2 all initial interviews were undertaken at home,
except for one in a day centre. All follow-up interviews were
undertaken at home in both PCTs.
The majority of participants lived in their own homes
(houses n = 17, with one person living downstairs; bunga-
lows n = 2; apartment in extra care housing n = 1; sheltered
housing n = 4), with slightly more than half of interviewees
living alone (n = 13).
All participants in PCT 1 had falls involving fractures
requiring treatment as inpatients (neck of femur, pubic rami,
pelvis, humerus, shoulder) while those in PCT 2 had minor
injuries, such as soft tissue injury, bumps, skinned elbow and
bruises, although one man had fractured a wrist that went
undetected (Table 1). For five participants this was a first-ever
fall, but for the majority (n = 22) it was a repeat fall, with
B. Roe et al.
588 � 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Page 4
participants in PCT 2 having more frequent falls within the
previous days, weeks, month or year, but with less injurious
consequences than those in PCT 1. Four participants had a
repeat fall between the initial and follow-up interview
(Table 1).
Location of falls
The majority of falls occurred indoors (n = 23), with nearly
half in the morning (n = 12, one in the shower and two on
the ground floor), fewer in the afternoon (n = 7) and five
participants falling at night while getting up to go to the
toilet, using a commode or getting ready for bed (Table 1).
The majority of participants were alone when they fell
(n = 15); eight were able to get up by crawling to furniture
and raising themselves up, while the remainder relied on
carers, spouses, neighbours, workmen or ambulance crews
to help them, having lain on the floor for 15–30 minutes.
Reflection, understanding and interpretation
On exploring their experience of the fall, a theme of
‘reflection’ arose, where the majority of people who reflected
on their fall to understand why it happened and its cause to
prevent a future fall (PCT 1, n = 10; PCT 2, n = 9). Few
people did not know why they fell or what caused it, and they
did not attempt to reflect on the reasons (n = 5).
Key features of falls were the suddenness and feeling alone.
One woman described the suddenness of not being able to
stop herself from falling:
Suddenly – I don’t know what happened but I just fell backwards,
caught my arm on the bannister and landed on the floor. (Mrs D,
aged 85 years with a fractured pubic rami)
Another stated:
I was in the living room walking along the carpet and all of a sudden I
was on the floor. I just simply went down, I couldn’t get back up. I
think one fall upsets the apple cart. This is what I have been afraid of.
Well, it came as a shock to me. (Mrs F, aged 87 years with a
fractured neck of femur).
Fourteen participants lived alone and the majority (n = 15)
were alone when they fell. Feeling alone was a feature of falls
for these people, as they were alone when they fell and unable
to get up:
I was alone. Well, I lay there for a bit and I banged my
head…eventually I got up – I was alone. With great trouble I got
myself up and stood up. Nobody, nobody (helped me). I was alone,
entirely alone. (Mrs A, aged 89 years with a fractured pubic rami)
Another woman stated:
I can remember being on the floor and I couldn’t get to the phone. I
hadn’t got (personal body-worn safety alarm) on. So I got told off for
that, but I wouldn’t have been able to use it as I wasn’t ‘with it’. I lay
for 3 hours… (Mrs V, aged 81 years)
Prior to their initial fall only three people had a personal
body-worn alarm, but only one was wearing the alarm at the
time of the fall and used it to get help, while two participants
crawled to theirs and used them. Participants in sheltered
accommodation could not access their call buttons as these
were in other rooms from where they fell; one woman who
had previously had a personal body-worn alarm at home
discontinued renting it when she moved into sheltered
accommodation. Eight participants obtained a personal
alarm following their initial fall, with half not being worn
at the follow-up interview. Two participants wore theirs but
had no need to use them, and a further two wore theirs but
only one pressed the alarm when they subsequently fell.
Table 1 Demography and falls characteristics of participants
according to primary care provider organization (primary care trust –
PCT)
Participants
PCT 1 PCT 2
n = 12 n = 15
Gender
Female 12 10
Male 0 5
Age (years)
Mean age 87 81
Age range 65–98 71–94
Type of interview
Initial 12 15
Follow up 8 10
Type of fall
First ever 3 2
Repeat 9 13
Location of fall
Indoors 10 13
Outdoors 2 2
Time of fall
Morning 5 7
Afternoon 4 3
Night time 1 4
Alone when fell 6 9
Injuries
Fractures 12 1
Soft tissue 0 14
Residence
Own home 8 14
Sheltered accommodation 4 0
Retirement community 0 1
JAN: ORIGINAL RESEARCH Older people’s experience of falls
� 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 589
Page 5
Loss of confidence and fear of falls appeared to relate to
the severity of the fall and the injuries sustained. The
majority of people, and those in PCT 1 who had suffered
serious injury as a consequence of their fall, reported loss
of confidence and fear of further falls, as illustrated by this
woman who was aged 90 years and sustained a fractured
neck of femur:
I just fell. I am afraid of falling…it’s just shattering. I feel nothing but
a nuisance. (Mrs G)
Another woman, aged 87 years, who also fractured her neck
of femur said:
The only worry is when I get home. I don’t want to go into a home. I
want to be independent. It did make me fear another fall – yes, it did
make me feel like that. It has made me feel like that, but I’m sure that
I will fight it. (Mrs F)
Fear of falling outside of the home was also a concern, as this
woman aged 82 years stated:
I’m a bit frightened go out. About falling again. I’ve fell in here and
fell at my son’s. Well, I’m frightened go out now through the door.
Yes, I was, ‘cause I went a real fall’. A real bang and cut my head.
(Mrs M)
Loss of confidence was also a concern, as typified by this man
aged 79 years:
But I’ve applied for one of them things around your neck. It’ll give me
more confidence, I should think. I’ve lost my confidence some while
ago. Just can’t walk, that’s the thing. Can’t get about. If I could get
out and walk, I’d be all right. (Mr O)
A minority of people, particularly those in PCT 2 who did
not have serious injury as a consequence of their fall,
reported fear of fall or loss of confidence, as evidenced by a
woman aged 81 years in PCT 2 who did not hurt herself
when she fell. She reported that her first fall had been about
3 years ago, when she said she started losing her balance.
She had fallen in the street and indoors and had been
helped. She had also fallen when alone and had managed to
get up by herself. She said that she now fell about twice a
month, with two falls in the last week. She was frightened
when she fell but said that she had not hurt herself and that
she managed to get herself up. Falls had restricted her life
and she would only go out accompanied, as she feared that
no-one would know who she was, and she had lost
confidence:
They’ve (falls) gone gradually worse, duck. Yea. But this last week or
two it’s gone sudden. Well, I can’t get about. I could get about before
but, you know, I’ve got be taken everywhere. I’ve got no confidence.
Lost all my confidence. Just come this has. I don’t know. It’s ‘cause I
can’t walk properly. (Mrs V, aged 81 years)
Personal strategies to overcome fear and boost confidence
included reflecting on the fall to understand why it had
happened; obtaining a personal body-worn alarm; being
cautious and taking things more slowly; minimizing environ-
mental factors; and using home adaptations and equipment,
e.g. hand rails, stair lifts, trolleys and walking frames. Some
participants restricted going outdoors unless accompanied
and there was a greater fear of falls outdoors than indoors,
because of their consequences. For one woman the fear was
that ‘Nobody knows who you are’, while another man
considered that people thought that ‘you might be drunk’.
One man had stopped driving because of his fear of falls and
had stopped his hobby of fishing as ‘I could fall in the lake’.
Participants who had fallen retained more control indoors
and felt safer.
Ageing and the life course
Falls were perceived as a consequence of ageing and part of
the life course. A woman aged 78 years who fell down stairs
in her home stated:
Well I could fall anytime It’s a thing old people do is fall or stumble
don’t they old people? It’s always these cracked bones and soft bones
and hip replacements with older people. Well I suppose they could go
a bit giddy couldn’t they? You know, well when you’re up (town) you
see more old people on walking sticks than any men and some
are…well they look old ‘cause they’re bent…I mean you could fall
anywhere, anytime couldn’t you? Anybody could fall. (Mrs S)
A man aged 76 years who is a carer for his wife, fell in the
shower in the morning and hurt his back reported:
The ‘60 (age) one was the worse one, (more) than this one. It was just
a nasty fall, very painful at the time because there’s age. You’ve got to
look at somebody at 20 and somebody at 70 odd, you see. (Age is a
factor) It is. It is, yea. You see, you begin to lose your strength a bit,
you know, although I’ve still got good strength. You know, in my
hands. (Mr Z)
Another woman aged 72 years observed:
I’ve not fallen before, that’s the first time. Only, you know, when
you’re younger, when you fall in the snow and bad weather and
things like that, but no. It really…it unsteadied me. Really, it did
unsteady me. (Mrs R)
She was attended by paramedics in her home as part of the
local health services response via general practitioners (GP) in
PCT 2, who confirmed that ageing was a factor to consider:
B. Roe et al.
590 � 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Page 6
He said, you know, how you are when you’re children, he says, you
don’t think as much about being stiff next day as you are when you’re
older. (Mrs R)
Preventive approaches, such as fitting safety hand rails in the
home, were also a feature of having a fall for some people,
but also as a consequence of age, as illustrated by a woman
aged 94 years who stated that ‘Social services had fitted rails
in my home, not because of falls but because of age’ (Mrs W).
For these older people who did reflect on age as a factor in
falls, it would appear that the older they were the greater the
severity or consequence of the fall. However, in contrast to
this finding, the impact and injury of a fall for a woman aged
65 years was as severe as for some of the older people
interviewed.
Maintaining control, choice and autonomy
Reflection, interpretation and understanding why and how
falls occurred related to maintaining control, choice and
autonomy. Participants who did not know why they fell nor
tried to understand it were a minority. They restricted or
curtailed their lives, e.g. one woman stayed indoors and only
moved between her bed and her sofa.
In relation to reflection and fear of falls, it would appear
that people who reflected on their falls confronted their
fear in one of two ways in order to maintain control,
choice and autonomy. They acknowledged their fear, faced
it, took steps to minimize falls but accepted the risk. For
example, Mrs B aged 86 years, who had a fractured neck
of femur, stated:
I’ve been trying to think about that and I don’t know…it sounds
stupid, but I felt as if my leg was broken before I fell. I just don’t
know how it happened. I just…I’ve tried to think how could it
happen. Because there was nothing in front of me, I didn’t fall over
anything. Just went down…
This woman had now returned to her own home from
hospital and had retained her independence. She has paid for
a second-hand stair-lift to be installed as she had initially used
crutches and found them difficult on stairs. She now used a
walking stick. She had adapted her life and used taxis instead
of buses but when going to do her shopping or friends would
drive her. She continued to use and pay for a personal body
alarm but did not wear the alarm around her neck. As her last
fall she had had another fall but did not injure herself. The
difference between the impact of both falls was that the
previous one caused injury requiring hospitalization while in
this most recent one she did not injure herself.
Another example are the words of a woman Mrs J, aged
76 years, who had a fractured neck of femur:
So I couldn’t get me (walking frame)…so I held onto the door and…I
got in the shop all right, but it’s coming out of the shop, because the
door was stiff see. If I hadn’t have been so clumsy, let’s put it that
way, I could have prevented it. I mean, it’s my fault, nobody else’s,
that I fell, you know. It was my fault entirely. Well, I just fell over this
little step. So, yea, I mustn’t have been concentrating.
And after the fall she said:
Well, as I am now I’m not active, but I don’t know how I’m going
to be later on, do I? You know, once I get home and get myself
going it’s going to take a time…so I don’t know really yet…it’s
knocked me, if you like, out of focus so I’ll have to take it slowly
and, with his help and that, I’ll have to take it slowly…I’m not one
for sitting on my bum, so I’ll have to remember to sit longer and
take it easy. Because I don’t like sitting down, but I’m going to have
to learn to sit down and take it easy. Then I’ll do little bits at a
time, yea. No, it will change my life. Yes, because I’ve got to learn
to slow down. (Mrs J)
However, others who reflected on their falls stated that they
were not frightened or worried as there was no point because
fear is a wasted emotion, and they accepted the risk.
A man aged 83 years who lived with his wife stated:
So I was rushing a little bit and that’s it. I didn’t pay due care and
attention. (I was disgusted) because I expected it…there was a risk it
(falling)would happen because…it’s happened I should say five times
in the last 3 years…I was just disgusted with myself because I can’t
stand fools, you know, and I’d been foolish (by rushing). I don’t
really worry. I mean, the only thing I worry about is James Gartside
coming up and measuring me. He’s the local funeral director. At my
age for God’s sake! The grim reaper gets daily nearer. No, I don’t
think about the future. I reminisce about the past, I must be honest. I
take it as it comes. Obviously…I try to avoid anything that I can. But
I don’t really think about it. (Mr N)
A woman who fell at home ‘suddenly’ while getting up to
answer the door to her carer said that she had not hurt
herself. She reflected on the cause of her fall and also said she
did not worry:
I’m never very ill, you know. Never have a cold or a headache. So I
can’t grumble. Yes, I am in good health. I never worry. I don’t believe
in it. Don’t believe in worrying. It doesn’t help does it? (Mrs Y, aged
83 years)
A further example was a man who had reflected on the cause
of his recent fall and compared it to a previous one and did
not fear a further fall:
No, I don’t…I don’t worry about that at all, you know. I’ve always
lived in danger. (Mr Z, aged 89 years)
JAN: ORIGINAL RESEARCH Older people’s experience of falls
� 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 591
Page 7
A minority of people did not reflect on the cause of their fall;
those who also did not know why they had fallen appeared to
live in fear, restricting their environment and activities.
Mrs C aged 98 years, with a fractured humerus stated:
I don’t know. Well…I can’t think of anything really, unless I had my
stick with me and whether I didn’t put it far enough away from me
and I caught my stick and went down, I just don’t know. Because I
was holding the handrail as well. Well, my eyes are not good, I can’t
see, I’ve got damaged retinas. Well, I don’t really know ‘cause, I
mean, I’ve always taken care. I’ve had so many falls that I’m wary of
falls. I don’t like them and I’m always so careful.
Mrs M aged 82 years, who lived alone and spent her day
going between her bed and the settee, stated:
I’ve got vertigo. No, I don’t know really. The doctor give me tablets
for it and then after a while he took them off me ‘cause he said they
were no good.
I just went to lock my door and I just stepped backwards and fell,
yea. It just happened…I’m a bit frightened go out. About falling
again. I’ve fell in here and fell at my son’s. Well, I’m frightened to go
out now through the door. Yes I was, ‘cause I went a real fall. A real
bang and cut my head.
For the majority this was a repeat fall, and as a consequence
of falls they slowed down, were more cautious and were
fearful of another fall, typified by the following woman aged
98 years who fractured her pubic ramus:
I don’t think I’d be very keen to walk out, for instance, by myself. I’m
a bit scared by this. I’ve had other falls you see. I had one
only…10 years ago. (Mrs H)
Another woman stated:
It’s just through what I’ve done with falling, so it’s frightened me. I
mean, this was the second fall I’ve had. I fell on the market once,
just tripped up. So I’m like that when I’m walking down. I’ve got
my eyes on the floor, looking see if anything’s in my way all the
time. But it has taken a lot of me – what do you call it? –
confidence away because I can’t do things now because I’ve got to
have something to hold onto all the time. Because I’m frightened of
falling. After having that fall and I didn’t realize I could…as I’d fell
badly, I’m just frightened now. I either clutch onto my husband or I
have this buggy (walking frame), so it’s taken my confidence away,
yea. It was such a bad fall and come unexpected that I’m just
frightened of falling. (Mrs J, aged 76 years, fractured neck of
femur).
Emotions and feelings
A range of emotions were experienced by participants during
and after the fall, ranging from shock, pain, fear, feeling
alone, anger and blaming themselves for the fall. An 86-year
old woman who had fractured her neck of femur said:
Well, it’s…I feel very annoyed. I feel very annoyed and stupid about
it. At first it upset me because I thought, well, am I ever going to get
walking again. But it’s improving now and I know I’m going to get
moving soon, I assure you…at the moment because I can’t get about,
I feel frustrated because I can only walk on crutches at the moment
so… (Mrs B)
Other people felt shocked, as illustrated by these two women
aged 87 years and 65 years respectively:
Well, it came as a shock. It’s a shock to me, very much. I really didn’t
think anything like this would ever happen to me. Nothing ever has
of all the years…and it came as a terrible shock. I’ve not really got
over it yet. (Mrs F, with fractured neck of femur)
Shock. Thinking of going in hospital. A shock, yea, because I don’t
usually like hospitals, you know what I mean? Oh, I was ever so
nervous and that. I was like this (trembling, shaking). Well,
somebody sent for an ambulance. (Mrs I, with fractured hip)
Others described the pain they experienced, as illustrated by a
woman aged 94 years who had fallen 3 months previously
and still experienced continual pain on moving:
Oh, it’s been terrible my back has, been terrible. It’s 3 months since I
did it and it isn’t better yet, although I can suffer it now – it isn’t very
much but it still hurts. Yes, they did take X-rays but I’m wondering,
you know, it was right at the bottom of my back. What is that bone
called at the bottom of your back? The cockles or something, isn’t it?
Well, I think it’s that what I’ve hurt. And I don’t think they X-rayed
down there – I think they must have done the middle of my back.
Because I can’t understand why they didn’t find anything wrong.
Because I was in agony – I just sat in this chair. And sitting in this
chair I hadn’t got the pains. It starts again…starts when I get up.
(Mrs W)
Discussion
The majority of people interviewed were women living in
their own homes, with nearly half of participants living alone
and the majority of falls occurring indoors. Women in PCT 1
were older and had a higher mean age than those interviewed
in PCT 2 and also suffered more injurious falls. This may
have been due to their increasing age and the locations from
which they were recruited. Those interviewed in PCT 2,
although slightly younger and having less injurious falls, were
experiencing more frequent falls, which may be indicative of
deteriorating medical co-morbidity. These findings are in
keeping with existing evidence on falls in older people.
B. Roe et al.
592 � 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Page 8
Twenty to 30% of falls result in reduced mobility and
independence and an increased risk of mortality (Todd &
Skelton 2004). Not only do falls in older people have serious
consequences for their health and well-being and impact on
their families and carers, but also incur substantial costs for
the health services. In the UK, around 10% of ambulance
calls are to people over 65 years who have fallen, with
around 60% of those attending hospital. Hospitalization
rates are five times higher for falls than with any other injury,
with 20% of frequent fallers followed-up at 1 year being in
hospital, long-term care or having died (Todd & Skelton
2004). Common risk factors for falls include chronic diseases
(Nevitt et al. 1989, Luukinen et al. 1995, Tinetti et al. 1996,
Lawlor et al. 2003, Lee et al. 2006), impaired mobility
(Tinetti et al. 1998, American Geriatrics Society, British
Geriatrics Society, and the American Academy of Orthopae-
dic Surgeons Panel on Falls Prevention 2001), sedentary
lifestyle (Skelton 2001), nutritional deficiencies (Tinetti et al.
1996), impaired cognition and poly-pharmacy (Campbell
et al. 1989, Koski et al. 1996, 1998) and visual impairment
(Jack et al. 1995, Ivers et al. 1998).
Understanding and interpreting falls
Most research has looked at existing information on falls,
risk factors and causes with a view to risk assessment and
prevention (Todd & Skelton 2004, Yardley et al. 2005). Few
researchers have investigated falls from the perspectives of
the individual who has fallen, and the impact on them and
their families (Kingston 2000, Salkeld et al. 2000, HEBS
1999, Horton & Arber 2004, Yardley et al. 2006, Horton
2007). This study contributes to this developing literature on
the social perspectives, experiences and implications of falls
for older people and their families.
Reflections, emotions and feelings
The majority of people reflected on their fall to try and
understand how and why it had happened, and only a small
minority did not reflect and did not know why they fell. Key
features were the suddenness of the fall and feeling alone,
particularly if they could not get up. They also expressed
shock and annoyance. People who cannot explain why they
have fallen may have little basis for reflection. Similarly,
those who have fallen without a clear precipitating cause may
be hampered in reflection as they lack a focus. In the case of
people who expressed feelings of being alone, reflection may
be painful as the loneliness and associated fear dominate the
need to work out why they have fallen. The feeling of shock
may be associated with suddenness or realization that a fall
signals a transition into a different stage of life. Annoyance is
a different process, and may relate to the consequences of a
fall, such as pain and impairment.
Around 50% of people who fall need help to get up after at
least one fall, with only 10% of falls resulting in a lie of more
than 1 hour. Lying on the floor for longer than 12 hours can
result in pressure ulcers, hypothermia, dehydration, pneumo-
nia and death (Tinetti et al. 1994, Todd & Skelton 2004).
Even non-injurious falls in an older person unable to get up
can result in death (Todd & Skelton 2004). In our study, the
majority of people were alone when they fell were indoors
and had repeated falls; a minority had to crawl and use
furniture to get themselves up, and the remainder relied up
help from family members, carers, the public or ambulance
services. A small minority had access to personal body-worn
alarms to call for help, but only a few wore them or had used
them. It is generally acknowledged within care services that
older people’s access to and adherence to using personal
body-worn alarms is low and that there may be ‘resistance’ to
their changing identity and dependence on others. Assistive
technologies are emerging that rely of non-body-worn
sensors, computers and the internet within homes to alert
service providers to older people’s need for help (Sixsmith
2000, Sixsmith & Johnson 2004, McCreadie & Tinker
2005).
Ageing and the life course
While the prevalence of falls increases with age and
underlying co-morbidities are implicated, prevention strat-
egies aim to prevent falls by addressing external and
intrinsic risk factors and teaching people how to get up
(Todd & Skelton 2004). The older a person, is the more
likely they are to fall and, although it is not possible to
prevent falls in older people completely, it may be possible
to delay onset or serious consequences associated with a
fall. In our study, some older people commented that falls
were a consequence of ageing and the life course, a
normalizing tendency similar to that with osteoarthritis
(Sanders et al. 2002), and this was also confirmed by some
healthcare professionals attending them. Of note were some
older people’s views on the consequences and severity of
falling at different ages and their ability to recover, the
inference being that the older a person is, the more serious
the consequences. However, this was not always borne out
from the data, as evidenced by a woman of 65 years who
had a severe fall and subsequently died being a relatively
‘young’ older person but whose underlying medical condi-
tions may have been deteriorating and her fall was a
prelude to this.
JAN: ORIGINAL RESEARCH Older people’s experience of falls
� 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 593
Page 9
Assistive equipment was used by a minority of people for
prevention and included frames, safety hand rails, shower
and bath seats. For some this was as a consequence of having
the fall, but for others it was to assist with maintaining
mobility and independence as they aged.
Fear of falls, loss of confidence
Older people in this study were frightened of having a further
fall and described a loss of confidence. Increased severity of
falls and their consequences appeared to be factors in their
feelings of fear. For some their confidence was returning as
they recuperated and they focused on regaining mobility and
confidence, whereas others accepted loss of confidence and
fear of falls as inevitable. Fear of falls has been reported in up
to 70% of people having a recent fall and up to 40% in those
not reporting a fall expressing a fear of falling (Tinetti et al.
1998, 1994). Psychological sequelae of falls continued to be
investigated, predominantly from a quantitative and risk
perspective, and have involved self-efficacy, self-esteem,
attribution and locus of control (Martin et al. 2005, Yardley
et al. 2005, Mann et al. 2006), although it is not clear which
came first – the fall or the fear of falling (Friedman et al.
2002). Chou and Chi (2007) studied the temporal relation-
ship between falls and fear of falling in older people in
primary care settings and found that falls and fear of falling
were not independent predictors. Rather, age was a common
independent predictor for falls and onset of fear of falls,
which lends some support to the argument that falls are part
of the ageing life course. They found no vicious cycle of falls
and fear of falls.
In our study, people who reflected on their falls and why they
occurred also appeared to handle their fear in one of two ways:
either acknowledging its existence, facing it and taking steps to
minimize future falls but accepting the risks involved as they
went about their daily lives or they stated they were not
frightened and that fear is a wasted emotion and accepted the
risk of falls in their daily lives. The minority of people who did
not reflect on their falls appeared to live in fear of future falls
and restricted their environments and daily activities, remain-
ing indoors. Reflection helps people to identify causes and
consequences; even when no apparent cause can be defined,
reflection plays a role in anticipation and adaptation to altered
identities from independent to dependent, from health to
frailty, or from outward facing to inward facing.
Control, choice and autonomy
Reflecting on, interpreting and understanding why and how
their falls occurred related to maintaining control, choice and
autonomy in daily lives and activities, facing the fear,
accepting the risk and getting on with life. Those who did
not reflect or did not know why they fell, albeit a minority,
curtailed and restricted their lives, which could result in
increasing isolation, withdrawal and loneliness. Maintaining
independence, social connectedness and choice in older age
remains a challenge (Cordingley & Webb 1997). Social
isolation and loneliness in older people continues to be
investigated. While social engagement with kin and social
networks benefits quality of life (Victor et al. 2005a),
loneliness as an attribute can vary over the life course and
may be a long-established trait, may be late in onset or may
even decrease with age (Victor et al. 2005b). Understanding is
needed of the experiences of older people who have had a fall
and the consequences from an individual perspective. Per-
ceived control can be a mediator between social support and
well-being in older people, as well as a feature of the life
course, self management and determination (Jacelon 2007).
Study limitations
As with all qualitative research, our findings cannot be
generalized to all populations. However, the study contrib-
utes to a small but developing body of research exploring the
consequence of falls from individuals’ perspectives and their
What is already known about this topic
• Falls are prevalent in older people and increase with
age, resulting in serious injury, hospitalization, mor-
bidity, long-term care needs and mortality.
• Falls risk assessment and falls prevention services fea-
ture as part of health policy and research.
• Little is known about individuals’ or families’ experi-
ences of falls.
What this paper adds
• The majority of older people reflected on their fall to
understand why it happened, adopted strategies to
prevent further falls, accepted the risk, faced the fear
and continued with their daily living activities.
• A minority of people who did not know why they had
fallen and did not reflect on their fall restricted their
daily activities and lived with a fear of falling.
• Assisting people to reflect on their falls and to under-
stand why they happened could help with preventing
future falls, allay fear, boost confidence and aid reha-
bilitation relating to their activities of daily living.
B. Roe et al.
594 � 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Page 10
families. Ideally we would have liked to interview older
people for whom it was their first-ever fall, but identifying
such people proved difficult as not all who fall, particularly
those who do not have an injurious fall, are reported to
healthcare professionals (Age Concern 1997). A pragmatic
approach to sampling was adopted and convenience samples
of people who had fallen within the previous 10 days were
recruited. Recruited location was related to severity of fall, its
consequences and age, which explained the differences
between PCT 1 and PCT 2. Thus, the two sub-samples
provided scope to explore the consequences of falls across age
cohorts in later life.
Conclusion
Helping people to reflect on their falls and understand why they
happen could help with prevention of future falls, reduce fear,
boost confidence and aid rehabilitation related to activities of
daily living. Further research into the social aspects of falls is
needed to improve understanding of the experiences older
people and their families and care networks. To inform falls
prevention policy and strategies, and to develop services and
care delivered by health and social care professionals.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by an internal grant from The Medical
School, Keele University and data collected was included in
an MA Gerontology awarded to Fiona Howell and an MSc in
Geriatric Medicine awarded to Konstantinos Riniotis from
Keele University. Thanks to the staff of the primary care
provider organizations that facilitated the study and to the
older people who agreed to be interviewed. Thanks also to
Sue Humphries for transcribing the tapes and Frank Ward,
Age Concern Chester for his advice.
Author contributions
BR, RB, PC & BO were responsible for the study conception
and design. FH & KR performed the data collection. BR, FH
& KR performed the data analysis. BR was responsible for
the drafting of the manuscript. BR, FH, KR, RB, PC & BO
made critical revisions to the paper for important intellectual
content. BR, FH, KR, RB, PC & BO obtained funding. BR
supervised the study.
References
Age Concern (1997) Looking for a Fall. A Report on Falls Incidence
in the UK. Age Concern, London.
American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatrics Society, and the
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel on Falls
Prevention (2001) Guideline for the prevention of falls in older
persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 49, 664–
672.
Blake A., Morgan K., Bendall M.J., Dallosso H., Ebrhaim S.B., Arie
T.H., Fentern P.H. & Bassey E.J. (1988) Falls by elderly people at
home: prevalence and associated factors. Age and Ageing 17, 365–
372.
Campbell A., Borrie M. & Spears G. (1989) Risk factors for falls in a
community-based prospective study of people aged 70 years and
older. Journal of Gerontology 44, M112–M117.
Chang J.T., Morton S.C., Rubenstein L.Z., Mojica W.A.,
Maglione M., Suttorp M.J., Roth E.A. & Shekelle P.G. (2004)
Interventions for the prevention of falls in older adults: systematic
review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trails. British
Medical Journal 328, 680–683.
Chou K. & Chi I. (2007) The temporal relationship between falls and
fear-of-falling among Chinese older primary-care patients in Hong
Kong. Ageing & Society 27, 181–193.
Cordingley L. & Webb C. (1997) Independence and aging. Reviews
in Clinical Gerontology 7, 137–146.
Cryer C. & Patel S. (2001) Falls, Fragility and Fractures. Report.
University of Kent, Centre for Health Services Research,
Canterbury.
DH (2003) How can we Help Older People not Fall Again? Imple-
menting the Older People’s NSF Falls Standard. Support for
Commissioning Good Services. Department of Health, London.
DH (2004) Better Health in old age. Report From Professor Ian
Philp. Department of Health, London.
Englander F., Hodson T.J. & Terregrossa R.A. (1996) Economic
dimensions of slip and fall injuries. Journal of Forensics Science 41,
733–746.
Friedman S.M., Munoz B., West S.K., Rubin G.S. & Fried L.P.
(2002) Falls and fear of falling: which comes first? A longitudinal
prediction model suggests strategies for primary and secondary
prevention. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 50(8),
1329–1335.
Gillespie L.D., Gillespie W.J., Robertson M.C., Lamb S.E.,
Cumming R.G. & Roe B.H. (2003) Interventions for preventing
falls in elderly people. In Cochrane Review in the Cochrane
Library, Issue 4. J Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Gryfe C.I., Aimes A. & Ashley M.J. (1977) A longitudinal study of
falls in an elderly population. Age and Ageing 6, 201–210.
HEBS (1999) The Construction of the Risks of Falling in Older
People: Lay and Professional Perspectives. Retrieved from http://
www.healthscotland.com/documents/352.aspx on 14 June 2008.
Horton K. (2002) Gender and Falls: Perceptions of Older People and
Their key Family Members. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of
Surrey, Guildford.
Horton K. (2007) Gender and the risk of falling: a sociological
approach. Journal of Advanced Nursing 57(1), 69–76.
Horton K. & Arber S. (2004) Gender and the negotiation between
older people and their carers in the prevention of falls. Ageing &
Society 24(1), 75–94.
Ivers R.Q., Cumming R.G., Mitchell P. & Attebo K. (1998) Visual
impairment and falls in older adults: the Blue Mountain Study.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 46(1), 58–64.
JAN: ORIGINAL RESEARCH Older people’s experience of falls
� 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 595
Page 11
Jacelon C.S. (2007) Theoretical perspectives of perceived control in
older adults: a selective review of the literature. Journal of
Advanced Nursing 59(1), 1–10.
Jack D.I., Smith T., Neoh C., Lye M. & McGalliard J.N. (1995)
Prevalence of low vision in elderly patients admitted to an acute
geriatric unit in Liverpool: elderly people who fall are more likely
to have low vision. Gerontology 41, 280–285.
Kingston P. (2000) Falls in later life: status passage and preferred
identities as a new orientation. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal
for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 4, 216–233.
Koski K., Luukinen H., Laippala P. & Kivela S.L. (1996) Physio-
logical factors and medications as predictors of injurious falls by
elderly people: a prospective population-based study. Age and
Ageing 25, 29–38.
Koski K., Luukinen H., Laippala P. & Kivela S.L. (1998) Risk factors
for major injurious falls among home-dwelling elderly by func-
tional abilities. Gerontology 44, 232–238.
Lawlor D.A., Patel R. & Ebrahim S. (2003) Association between falls
in elderly women and chronic diseases and drug use: cross sectional
study. British Medical Journal 327, 712–717.
Lee J.S.W., Kowk T., Leung P.C. & Woo J. (2006) Medical illnesses
are more important than medications as risk factors of falls in older
community dwellers? A cross-sectional study. Age and Ageing 35,
246–251.
Luukinen H., Koski K., Hitunene L. & Kiveal S.K. (1994) Incidence
rate of falls in an aged population in northern Finland. Journal of
Clinical Epidemiology 47(8), 843–850.
Luukinen H., Koski K., Laippala P. & Kivela S.L. (1995) Predictors
for recurrent falls among the home dwelling elderly. Scandinavian
Journal of Primary Health Care 13, 294–299.
Mann R., Birks Y., Hall J., Torgerson D. & Watt I. (2006) Exploring
the relationship between fear of falling and neuroticism: a cross-
sectional study in community-dwelling women over 70. Age and
Ageing 35, 143–147.
Martin F.C., Hart D., Spector T., Doyle D.L. & Harari D. (2005)
Fear of falling limiting activity in young-old women is associated
with reduced functional mobility rather than psychological factors.
Age and Ageing 34, 281–287.
McCreadie C. & Tinker A. (2005) The acceptability of assistive
technology to older people. Ageing Society 25, 91–110.
Morse J.M., Tylko S.J. & Dixon H.A. (1987) Characteristics of the
fall-prone patient. The Gerontologist 27(4), 516–522.
Nevitt M.C., Cummings S.R., Kidds S. & Black D. (1989) Risk
factors for recurrent nonsyncopal falls. A prospective study. Jour-
nal of the American Medical Association 261, 2663–2668.
NICE (2004) The Assessment and Prevention of Falls in Older
People. Guideline 021. Retrieved from http://www.nice.org.uk/
CG021 on 5 November 2007.
O’Loughlin J.L., Robitaille Y., Boivin J.F. & Suissa S. (1993)
Incidence of risk factors for falls and injurious falls among
community-dwelling elderly. American Journal of Epidemiology
137, 342–354.
Rawsky E. (1998) Review of the literature on falls among the elderly.
Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship 30(1), 47–52.
Salkeld G., Cameron I.D., Cumming R.G. et al. (2000) Quality of life
related fear of falling and hip fracture in older women: a time trade
off study. British Medical Journal 320, 341–346.
Sanders C., Donovan J. & Dieppe P. (2002) The significance and
consequences of having painful and disabled joints in older age: co-
existing accounts of normal and disrupted biographies. Sociology
of Health & Illness 24(2), 227.
Sixsmith A. (2000) An evaluation of an intelligent home monitoring
system. Journal of Telemedicine & Telecare 6(2), 63–72.
Sixsmith A. & Johnson N. (2004) A smart sensor to detect falls in the
elderly. IEEE Pervasive Computing 3(2), 42–47.
Skelton D.A. (2001) Effects of physical activity on postural stability.
Age and Ageing 20(S4), 33–39.
Tinetti M.E. (2003) Preventing falls in elderly persons. New England
Journal of Medicine 348, 42–49.
Tinetti M., Mendes de Leon C.F., Doucette J.T. & Baker D.I. (1994)
Fear of falling and fall-related efficacy in relationship to func-
tioning among community-living elders. Journal of Gerontology
49, M140–M147.
Tinetti M., Doucette J., Claus E. & Marottoli R. (1996) Risk factors
for serious injury during falls by older persons in the community.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 43, 1214–1221.
Tinetti M.E., Speechley M. & Ginter S.F. (1998) Risk factors for falls
among elderly persons living in the community. New England
Journal of Medicine 319, 1701–1707.
Todd C. & Skelton D. (2004) What are the Main Risk Factors for
Falls Among Older People and What are the Most Effective
Interventions to Prevent Falls. World Health Organisation Re-
gional Office for Europe. Retrieved from http://www.euro.-
who.int/document/E82552.pdf on 30 October 2007.
Victor C., Grenade L. & Boldy D. (2005a) Measuring loneliness in
later life: a comparison of differing measures. Ageing & Society 15,
63–70.
Victor C.R., Scambler S.J., Bowling A. & Bond J. (2005b) The
prevalence of, and risk factors for, loneliness in later life: a
survey of older people in Great Britain. Ageing & Society 25,
357–375.
Yardley L., Beyer N., Hauer K., Kempen G., Piot-Ziegler C. & Todd
C. (2005) Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy
Scale-International (FES-I). Age and Ageing 34, 614–619.
Yardley L., Donovan-Hall M., Francis K. & Todd C. (2006) Older
people’s views of advice about falls prevention: a qualitative study.
Health Education Research 21(4), 508–517.
Yasamura S., Haga H., Nagai H., Suzuli T., Amanho H. & Shibata
H. (1994) Rate of falls and correlates among elderly people living
in urban community Japan. Age and Ageing 23, 323–327.
B. Roe et al.
596 � 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd