Top Banner
New MC set summary MC set RNuc (XnXn) UPC minbias with and without interference 6.8 fm UPC topology with and without interference 8.0 fm MC set RNuc (XnXn) minbias w/o interference 6.35 fm (XnXn) minbias w/ interference 6.8 fm topology w/o interference 7.55 fm topology w/ interference 8.0 fm Old MC set summary • 400k events generated for each set in STARlight • Radius adjusted for matching exponential slope of t-spectrum • Fully reconstructed (raw output run through same processes as data to account for detector effects) •‘Old’ MC Set - radius matched to exponential slope for both MC sets (with and without interference) •‘New’ MC Set - same radius for both sets Monte Carlo set comparison
14

Old MC set summary Monte Carlo set comparisonnuclear.ucdavis.edu/~bhaag/NewPage/supporting... · (XnXn) minbias w/ interference 6.8 fm topology w/o interference 7.55 fm topology w

May 10, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Old MC set summary Monte Carlo set comparisonnuclear.ucdavis.edu/~bhaag/NewPage/supporting... · (XnXn) minbias w/ interference 6.8 fm topology w/o interference 7.55 fm topology w/

New MC set summary

MC set RNuc

(XnXn) UPC minbias

with and without interference

6.8 fm

UPC topology with and without

interference

8.0 fm

MC set RNuc

(XnXn) minbias w/o interference

6.35 fm

(XnXn) minbias w/ interference

6.8 fm

topology w/o interference

7.55 fm

topology w/ interference

8.0 fm

Old MC set summary

• 400k events generated for each set inSTARlight

• Radius adjusted for matching exponentialslope of t-spectrum

• Fully reconstructed (raw output run throughsame processes as data to account fordetector effects)

•‘Old’ MC Set - radius matched toexponential slope for both MC sets (with andwithout interference)

•‘New’ MC Set - same radius for both sets

Monte Carlo setcomparison

Page 2: Old MC set summary Monte Carlo set comparisonnuclear.ucdavis.edu/~bhaag/NewPage/supporting... · (XnXn) minbias w/ interference 6.8 fm topology w/o interference 7.55 fm topology w/

• 400k events generated for MinBias(XnXn) MC set in STARlight

• Radius adjusted for matchingexponential slope of t-spectrum

• fit function = Ae-k*t

• data k = 302 GeV-1

• MC k = 296 GeV -1

• fit range: 0.004 < t < 0.01

Page 3: Old MC set summary Monte Carlo set comparisonnuclear.ucdavis.edu/~bhaag/NewPage/supporting... · (XnXn) minbias w/ interference 6.8 fm topology w/o interference 7.55 fm topology w/

• 400k events generated for topology(0n0n) MC set in STARlight

• Radius adjusted for matchingexponential slope of t-spectrum

• fit function = Ae-k*t

• data k = 373 GeV-1

• MC k = 371 GeV -1

• fit range: 0.004 < t < 0.01

Page 4: Old MC set summary Monte Carlo set comparisonnuclear.ucdavis.edu/~bhaag/NewPage/supporting... · (XnXn) minbias w/ interference 6.8 fm topology w/o interference 7.55 fm topology w/

Explanation of plots:

1) Ratio of GEANT correctedMonte Carlo (STARlight)interference t-spectrum(t~pT

2) to no-interference t-spectrum

2) Ratio of uncorrectedSTARlight interference t-spectrum to no-interferencet-spectrum

3) Efficiency curves calculatedfor interference and no-interference scenarios (ratioof MC t-spectrum runthrough GEANT to t-spectrum not run throughGEANT)

4) MC interference histogram(blue), MC no-interferencehistogram (green),uncorrected data (redpoints), overallparameterization (red curve)

5) uncorrected data (redpoints), overallparameterization (red curve)

1 2

3 4

5

Page 5: Old MC set summary Monte Carlo set comparisonnuclear.ucdavis.edu/~bhaag/NewPage/supporting... · (XnXn) minbias w/ interference 6.8 fm topology w/o interference 7.55 fm topology w/

UPC MinBias(with nuclear excitation) or UPC topology(withoutnuclear excitation) = trigger dataset

Explanation of statistics:

(1) p0 - p6, fit parameters for 6thorder polynomial fit to ratio

(2) Same as 1

(4 &5)

p0 - p2 come from overall fit:

p0 = A

p1 = c

p2 = k

1 2

3 4

5

Page 6: Old MC set summary Monte Carlo set comparisonnuclear.ucdavis.edu/~bhaag/NewPage/supporting... · (XnXn) minbias w/ interference 6.8 fm topology w/o interference 7.55 fm topology w/

old UPC MinBias 0.1 < y < 0.5

new UPC MinBias 0.0 < y < 0.5

Page 7: Old MC set summary Monte Carlo set comparisonnuclear.ucdavis.edu/~bhaag/NewPage/supporting... · (XnXn) minbias w/ interference 6.8 fm topology w/o interference 7.55 fm topology w/

old UPC MinBias 0.1 < y < 0.5

new UPC MinBias 0.0 < y < 0.5

Page 8: Old MC set summary Monte Carlo set comparisonnuclear.ucdavis.edu/~bhaag/NewPage/supporting... · (XnXn) minbias w/ interference 6.8 fm topology w/o interference 7.55 fm topology w/

old UPC MinBias 0.5 < y < 1.0

new UPC MinBias 0.5 < y < 1.0

Page 9: Old MC set summary Monte Carlo set comparisonnuclear.ucdavis.edu/~bhaag/NewPage/supporting... · (XnXn) minbias w/ interference 6.8 fm topology w/o interference 7.55 fm topology w/

old UPC MinBias 0.5 < y < 1.0

new UPC MinBias 0.5 < y < 1.0

Page 10: Old MC set summary Monte Carlo set comparisonnuclear.ucdavis.edu/~bhaag/NewPage/supporting... · (XnXn) minbias w/ interference 6.8 fm topology w/o interference 7.55 fm topology w/

old UPC Topology 0.1 < y < 0.5

new UPC Topology 0.1 < y < 0.5

Page 11: Old MC set summary Monte Carlo set comparisonnuclear.ucdavis.edu/~bhaag/NewPage/supporting... · (XnXn) minbias w/ interference 6.8 fm topology w/o interference 7.55 fm topology w/

old UPC Topology 0.1 < y < 0.5

new UPC Topology 0.1 < y < 0.5

Page 12: Old MC set summary Monte Carlo set comparisonnuclear.ucdavis.edu/~bhaag/NewPage/supporting... · (XnXn) minbias w/ interference 6.8 fm topology w/o interference 7.55 fm topology w/

old UPC Topology 0.5 < y < 1.0

new UPC Topology 0.5 < y < 1.0

Page 13: Old MC set summary Monte Carlo set comparisonnuclear.ucdavis.edu/~bhaag/NewPage/supporting... · (XnXn) minbias w/ interference 6.8 fm topology w/o interference 7.55 fm topology w/

old UPC Topology 0.5 < y < 1.0

new UPC Topology 0.5 < y < 1.0

Page 14: Old MC set summary Monte Carlo set comparisonnuclear.ucdavis.edu/~bhaag/NewPage/supporting... · (XnXn) minbias w/ interference 6.8 fm topology w/o interference 7.55 fm topology w/

MC set Summary

80/47

86/47

77/47

77/47

χ2/dof

88/47

84/47

79/47

46/47

χ2/dof

0.97±0.201.1±0.210.5 < y < 1.0

0.80±0.11

0.93±0.11

1.01±0.09

cold

Topology

0.93±0.110.5 < y < 1.0

0.86±0.110.1 < y < 0.5

0.95±0.080.1 < y < 0.5

cnew

Minbias