Ohio County Year 1 Results May 2012 NDPC SD and WVDE
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Ohio County
Year 1 ResultsMay 2012
NDPC SD and WVDE
BASELINE DATA
Red Flags:Student AbsencesIncidences resulting in ISSReading level of at-risk students
Baseline Data Details• Students absent for 6-10 days– 23% All– 12% SWD
• Incidents of ISS for tardies in 2010-11– 618 All– 69 SWD
• Average Lexile score for targeted students is 665
FOCUS TOPICS
Considering current resources and practices, what did the team select as the
focus area(s) for the work?
Focus Areas Attendance
Behavior
Academics/Course Performance
GOALSOUTCOMES
EVALUATION
What we did and our results
Goal 1:
Increase graduation rate by 1%
Goal 1 Data Targets
Graduation rate for 2011-2012
Group 2010-2011 2011-2012
All 75% At least 76%
SWD 59% At least 60%
Goal 1 Strategies
• Implement Option Pathway Program• Activate School-wide Monitoring Team• Incorporate READ 180 curriculum and
techSteps
Goal 1 Implementation Steps
• Full-time GED teacher to offer Option Pathway to students to meet graduation requirements
• Option Pathway team to identify students for the program
• Assemble a school-wide monitoring team that includes the following: OCS Attendance Director, WPHS Assistant Principals and Counselors, Graduation Coaches
Goal 1 Implementation Steps
• Credit checks and student academic progress monitored by the team regularly
• Identified 60 at-risk students for reading intervention to be scheduled into the READ 180 block classes
Goal 2:
• Decrease truancy by 2%
• Decrease the number of students receiving ISS for tardies by 8%
Goal 2 Data Targets
• Students absent for 6-10 days
• ISS for student tardies
Group 2011 2012
All 23% 21%
SWD 12% 10%
Group 2011 2012
All 618 568
SWD 69 63
Goal 2 Strategies
• Activate School-wide Monitoring Team
• Implement Tardy Monitoring Procedure
Goal 2 Implementation Steps
• Assemble a school-wide monitoring team that includes the following: OCS Attendance Director, WPHS Assistant Principals, Counselors, and Graduation Coaches
• Bi-weekly meetings to review attendance lists and to identify interventions needed (letter, phone call, home visit, Juvenile Mediation, court, DHHR, etc.)
Goal 2 Implementation Steps
• Daily updates to Google Doc used to monitor students identified at-risk (attendance, academics, behavior)
• Design a plan for conducting tardy sweeps and solicit teacher volunteers to participate
• Conduct tardy sweeps between each period and monitor student infractions and teacher implementation of school procedures
RESULTS
What are our results at the end of one year?Where do we stand now with our progress?
What conclusions have we identified?
Goal 1 Results
Projected Graduation Rate for 2012 (2011 cohort)
Group State 2011 WPHS 2011 WPHS 2012 Change
All 76% 75% 82% +7%
SWD 58% 59% 56% -3%
Goal 1 Results
Targets Students Average Lexile Scores
Beginning of Year End of Year
665 ?
Goal 1 Results
Completed TechSteps Lessons
Year 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade
2011 0 0 0 0
2012 58 130 302 65
Goal 2 Results
Attendance – Students absent for 6-10 days
Group 2011 2012 Change
All 23% 13% -10%
SWD 12% 10% -2%
Goal 2 Results
ISS – Incidents of Student Tardies
Group 2011 2012 Incident Change % Change
All 618 419 -199 32%
SWD 69 47 -22 32%
GRADUATIONDROPOUT
POST SCHOOL OUTCOMES
Where were we in the past?Where are we for 2012?
Graduation Rate Projection
All Students Students with IEPs
Standard Diploma
Cohort Denominator
Rate Standard Diploma
Cohort Denominator
Rate
WHPS 331 443 75% 33 56 59%
State 16,635 21,759 76% 2,049 3,566 57%
NCLB Data for 2010-2011 (2010 Cohort)
Projected NCLB Data for 2011-2012 (2011 Cohort)
All Students Students with IEPs
Standard Diploma
Cohort Denominator
Rate Standard Diploma
Cohort Denominator
Rate
WHPS 335 409 82% 24 43 56%
Dropout Rate Projection
All Students Grades 7-12 Students with IEPs Grades 7-12
Enrollment Drops Rate Enrollment Drops Rate
Ohio Co. 2,452 47 1.9% 286 8 2.8%
State 122,115 2,729 2.3% 19,103 523 2.7%
Dropout Rate 2010-2011 (2010 Cohort)
Projected Dropout Rate for 2011-2012 (2011 Cohort)
All Students Grades 7-12 Students with IEPs Grades 7-12
Enrollment Drops Rate Enrollment Drops Rate
Ohio Co. 2,460 54 2.1% 279 16 5.7%
Post School Outcomes Projection
• WPHS needs to increase the response rate for the One Year Follow-up Exit Survey completed by students.
• This year each special education teacher will personally contact their advisees from 2011 to complete the survey.
NEXT STEPS
What do we do next year?What does our future hold?
Next Steps and Plans for the Future
• Investigate an advisor/advisee system to support at-risk students
• More home visits conducted by school personnel
• Solicit additional teacher support for tardy sweep procedures
Next Steps and Plans for the Future
• Attendance/grades/discipline will be tied into privileges to attend dances and extra-curricular activities
• Collaborate with local agencies to improve transition services for students with disabilities
REFLECTIONS
What have we learned?What do our students, staff, families
and community members say?What will we change?
Lessons Learned-Observations-Reflections
• Assistant Principals need to loop with their students through the three/four years in high school
• Immediate action needs to be taken for truancy at day 6
• Consistency on procedures and consequences must be maintained throughout all grade levels
Related Documents
