Offshore Safe Lifting Committee.pdf

7/28/2019 Offshore Safe Lifting Committee.pdf

1/22

Offshore Safe Lifting Committee

2009 and 2010 Incident Review

Presenter: Bob Watson-Seatrax CranesAnalysis Review Team:Allen Verret-OOCLarry Smith-Oil States SkagitGregg Germer-ExxonMobil


2/22

SLC ReviewLifting Incidents from 2009 and 2010 were reviewed 2009: 206 incidents and 64 injuries (31%) 2010: 109 incidents and 39 injuries (36%)

2009: 74 of 206 Incidents reported by (5) Majors

10% of companies reporting 36% of incidents

2010 31 of 109 Incidents reported by (4) Majors

9.5% of companies reporting 28% of incidents


3/22

Summary of Incidents/Injuries

0

50

100

150

200

250

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

# o

f I n c

i d e n

t s / I n

j u r i e s

Incidents

Injuries

Trend peaked in 2009, but coming down in 2010.

Reasons?


4/22

Lifting Incidents Per Month

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

J an Mar May J uly Sept Nov J an Mar May J uly Sept Nov

2009 and 2010

# o f

I n c i

d e n

t s

Lifting Incidents per month trending downward 2009

Keep up the good work


5/22

Injur ies as % Incident s

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Total injuries numbers falling but percentage of injuries rising over past 5 years.


6/22

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

# o

f I n c i d e n

t s

Employee failure Equipment failure Other

General Cause of Incident

2009

2010

While Equipment failures are occurring, employee failure remains maincause for incident.


7/22

0

2040

60

80

100

120

140

160

# o

f I n c i

d e n

t s

L o a d s n a g g e d

C o m p l i f t i n g d e v i c e

E m p l o y e e f a i l u r e

R i g g i n g C o m p o n e n t

L o a d s h i f t e d

B o o m F a i l u r e

O t h e r D r l g e q m t

U n s p e c i f i e d

T a g L i n e

Type of Lifting Failure

Loads snagging or contacting continues to be main type of lifting incident.

2005-2008

2009

2010


8/22

020

406080

100120140

160180

# o

f I n c i

d e n

t s

D e c k t o D e c k

M a r i n e V e s s e l t o P l a t . D e c k

P l a t . D e c k t o M a r i n e V e s s e l

R i g f l o o r / V - d o o r / W e l l

V e s s e l t o V e s s e l

N o n - l i f t

S u b s e a t o f a c i l i t y

Type of Lif t

2005-2008

2009

2010

Deck to deck lifts still #1 but lifts involving the MV still near the top.


9/22

Time of Day Lifting Incident Occurred

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 0 0 0

- 0 1 0 0

0 2 0 0

0 3 0 0

0 4 0 0

0 5 0 0

0 6 0 0

0 7 0 0

0 8 0 0

0 9 0 0

1 0 0 0

1 1 0 0

1 2 0 0

1 3 0 0

1 4 0 0

1 5 0 0

1 6 0 0

1 7 0 0

1 8 0 0

1 9 0 0

2 0 0 0

2 1 0 0

2 2 0 0

2 3 0 0

2 4 0 0

Time of Day

# o

f I n c i

d e n

t s

20092010

Peak times for incidents mid morning and mid afternoon.


10/22

SLC Injury Analysis

Injury to who

What part of body

Cause of Injury


11/22

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

# o f I n j u r i e s

R i g g e r F l o o r H a n d

O t h e r T r a n s b a s k e t

M V D e c k h a n d

C r a n e O p e r .

S i g n a l m a n P r o d O p e r

D i v e r

Injury to Whom

Trend continues to be riggers sustaining most injuries.

2009

2010


12/22

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

%

Hand Leg Head Back Arm Chest Groin Other

Injury to Body

2005-2008

2009

2010

Hand injuries continue to be number one.


13/22

Hand Injuries details

2009: 20 Hand Injuries Cause: 20 employee failure Contributing factor: 13 position, 2 cant tell, 2

training, 1 other

2010: 16 Hand Injuries Cause: 14 employee failure, 1 equipment

failure, 1 cant tell Contributing factor: 14 position, 2 cant tell


14/22

Injuries occurring from employee failure and load snagging/contacting remaintop two causes.

Cause of Injury

05

10152025303540

E m p l o

y e e f

a i l u r e

L o a d

C o n

t a c t e d

D r i l l i n

g E q u

i p m e n t

S l i n g

F a i l u r e

B o o m

c o n t a

c t e d

C a b l e

p a r t e d

L o a d

S h i f t e d O t

h e r

# o

f I n j u r i e s 2007

200820092010


15/22

Conclusions and ObservationsLifting Incidents:

Decreased since beginning 2009. Employee Failure: Not following training or established procedures is still

the main factor leading to an incident and not hardware failure. Load snagging / contacting being main type of incident

Injuries: Who: Rigger What: Hand Why: Employee failure along with loads snagged / contacted

Diverse amount of detail in the reporting of lifting incidents

Trend downward in numbers, but injury rate rising.

Behavior still major factor and not equipment failures, lack of maintenance orhardware.


16/22

Recommendations

Focus training on riggers with emphasis on: Positioning of body to load Proper and safe use of air tuggers Use of placing hands on:

Loads being liftedLive wirerope

Near sheaves/blocks As wirerope is reeved onto air tugger

Crane Operator refresher training: Load Swing path planning


17/22

BACKUP


18/22

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

# o

f I n c i

d e n t s

T r a i n i n g

C a n ' t t e l l f r o m d a t a

P o s i t i o n

O t h e r L a c k o f m a i n t e n a n c

e

L a c k o f k n o w l e d g e

Cause of Incident

2009

2010


19/22

020406080

100

120140160180

# o

f I n c i

d e n

t s

D e c k t o D e c k

M a r i n e V e s s e l t o P l a t . D e c k

P l a t . D e c k t o M a r i n e V e s s e l

R i g f l o o r / V - d o o r / W e l l

V e s s e l t o V e s s e l

N o n - l i f t

S u b s e a t o f a c i l i t y

Type of Lif t2005-2008

2009

2010


20/22

2008 Injuires

Leg19%

Head

12%

Back10%

Arm9%

Chest9% Groin2%

Hand

39%


21/22

2009 Injuries

Hand31%

Leg19%

Head11%

Back17%

Arm3%

Chest8%

Groin0%

Not Given11%


22/22

2010 Injuries

Hand

41%

Leg26%

Head8%

Back

10%

Not Given5%

Groin0%Chest

5%Arm5%

Offshore Safe Lifting Committee.pdf

Documents