Office of Research and Development National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images. The photo image area is located 3.19” from left and 3.81” from top of page. Each image used in collage should be reduced or cropped to a maximum of 2” high, stroked with a 1.5 pt white frame and positioned edge-to-edge with accompanying images. November 4-5, 2009 Mary Ann Curran, PhD [email protected]The Opportunities and Pitfalls of Applying Life Cycle Thinking to Nanoproducts and Nanomaterials Life Cycle Assessment
22
Embed
Office of Research and Development National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images.
The photo image area is located 3.19” from left and 3.81” from top of page.
Each image used in collage should be reduced or cropped to a maximum of 2” high, stroked with a 1.5 pt white frame and positioned edge-to-edge with accompanying images.
The Opportunities and Pitfalls of Applying Life Cycle Thinking to Nanoproducts and Nanomaterials
Life Cycle Assessment
22
Life Cycle AssessmentAn industrial environmental management approach to look holistically at products, processes, and activities.
Raw Material Acquisition
ProductionUse/Maintenance
End-of-LifeManagement
Reuse
Recycling
3
Antimicrobial Silver in Socks
Silver Ore Mining
RefinementSilver
Feedstock
TransportNanocomponent
Manufacturing
Use Nanoproduct Manufacturing
Disposal
Transport
Distribution
44 Time Magazine, March 23, 2009
Using LCA to “understand the global environmental consequences of our
local choices.”
5
Worldwide interest in the life cycle concept is ignited by several factors
• Increased concerns about Global Climate Change
(Al Gore’s 2006 documentary “An Inconvenient Truth”).• Walmart’s quest to develop a Sustainability Index for the products they carry.
• The US Green Building Council’s promotion of sustainable buildings and the LEED standard.
• General interest by companies to be ‘green’ and ‘sustainable.’
6
Meyer D, Curran MA, and Gonzalez MA (2009) “An Examination of Existing Data for the Industrial Manufacture And Use of Nanocomponents and Their Role in the Life Cycle Impact of Nanoproducts,” ES&T 43(5); pp1256-1263.
7
Aspects of Applying Life Cycle Thinking to Nanoproducts
• Abridged Boundaries: Cradle-to-Gate• Life-Cycle Based Risk Assessment• Scale-Up to National Production Levels• Energy Demands• Global Climate Change Focus• Need for Decision Support
8
Glossary
• Life Cycle Concept: consideration of all the connected activities within an industrial system from cradle-to-grave, i.e. the product life.
• Life Cycle Assessment: a standardized process to quantify natural resources used and wastes released to the environment from cradle-to-grave; to assess the impact of quantities; and to identify opportunities to affect environmental improvements.• Screening Level or Streamlined Assessment• Detailed Life Cycle Assessment
• Life Cycle-Based Approach: use of the life cycle concept to view a product system from cradle to grave but limit the study to a pre-determined area of concern, such as energy use, global climate change, material use, etc.
• Life Cycle Management: the integration of environmental, economic, technological, risk, implementation, and societal aspects of products & services on a life cycle basis.
Less ozone allows increased UVB radiation which leads to following ENDPOINTS
immune system suppression
skin cancer cataracts
marine life damage
damage to materials like plastics
crop damage
1515
Life Cycle Impact Assessment Indicators of Potential Impact
Impact Category Indicator MeasurementImpact Category Indicator Measurement• Global WarmingGlobal Warming kg COkg CO2 2 equivalentsequivalents• Ozone DepletionOzone Depletion CFC-11 equivalentsCFC-11 equivalents• AcidificationAcidification kg SOkg SO22 equivalents equivalents• Eutrophication Eutrophication kg POkg PO44
3-3- equivalents equivalents• Smog FormationSmog Formation kg Ethene equivalentskg Ethene equivalents• Human ToxicityHuman Toxicity HTx equivalentsHTx equivalents• Eco-toxicityEco-toxicity ETx equivalentsETx equivalents• WasteWaste kg Wastekg Waste• Resource Use Resource Use kg Scarce Resourceskg Scarce Resources• WaterWater mm33 Water Water• Land UseLand Use being developedbeing developed
1616
• Most scientifically defensible methodologies for use within the US.
• Consistent with US EPA regulations, policies and guidelines. Available for site-specific or generic site analyses.
• Models to the Midpoints.
• Useful for LCA, Benchmarking, Product/Process Comparisons, Setting Sustainability Metrics, etc.
Principal Investigator: Jane Bare, Sustainable Technology Division
• “Classical” Risk Assessment characterizes the nature and magnitude of health risks to humans and the environment from potential chemical contaminants and other stressors.
• Comprehensive Environmental Assessment (CEA)
– Integrates Life Cycle Thinking and Risk Assessment.– Identifies potential releases and risk at points along the
life cycle.–Focuses on a select chemical or stressor. –CEA is not an LCA.
1919
Scaling Up to National Production Levels
• A clearly defined goal for an LCA:– Determines the scope of the study– Sets the boundaries and scale– Identifies the product or process function– Sets the Functional Unit – Defines the level of data detail & quality
• Basing the functional unit on potential market share rather on a single product will be result in more apparent impacts, such as resource use.
20
Life Cycle Thinking
At times, there is confusion between
LCA and other Life Cycle Based Approaches.
Life Cycle Based Approaches use the life cycle concept to view a product system from cradle to grave but limit
the study to a pre-determined area of concern, such as:
Energy Use
Global Climate Change
Material Use
2121
Life Cycle Management
Technical Feasibility
EnvironmentalImpacts (LCA) Costs ($)
IntegratedDecision-Making
Societal Benefits
Risk Analysis
Viability
2222
Suggested Reading
• Curran, M.A. (ed.) (1996) Environmental Life Cycle Assessment, McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0-07-015063-X.
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA (2006). Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Practice, EPA/600/R-06/060, available on-line,
www.epa.gov/ORD/NRMRL/lcaccess.• Horne R, Grant T, and Verghese K. (2009). Life Cycle Assessment:
Principles, Practice and Prospects. ISBN: 9780643094529; 160PP; CSIRO Publishing, Australia.
• Guinee, J., Ed. (2001). Life Cycle Assessment: An Operational Guide to the ISO Standards.
• Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, SETAC (1990). A Technical Framework for Life Cycle Assessments. J Fava, R Denison, B
Jones, MA Curran, B Vigon, S Sulke, and J Barnum (eds), 152 pages.• Curran, M. A. (2008). Human Ecology: Life Cycle Assessment. 8 PP;
Encyclopedia of Ecology, Five-Volume Set, ISBN-13: 978-0-444-52033-3; ISBN-10: 0-444-52033-3; Elsevier.
• ISO 14040 (2006). Environmental Management – LCA – Principles and Framework. International Standards Organization, Geneve, Switzerland.