Top Banner
Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations
13
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations.

Office of Highway Safety

Motor Carrier OperationsMotor Carrier Operations

Page 2: Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations.

Global Limo Compliance ReviewsGlobal Limo Compliance Reviews• Preaccident (2004)

– Numerous violations (drivers, vehicles)

– Satisfactory rating

• Postaccident (2005)– Numerous violations (drivers, vehicles)

– Unsatisfactory rating

– Consistent violations

Page 3: Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations.

Motor Carrier SafetyMotor Carrier Safety

• FMCSA

– To reduce crashes, injuries, and fatalities

• FMCSRs

– To establish safe operating requirements for vehicles, drivers, and motor carriers

• Compliance review

– To investigate safety regulation violations and calculate company safety fitness

Page 4: Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations.

Compliance Review FactorsCompliance Review Factors

• General

• Driver

• Operational

• Vehicle

• Accident rate

• Hazardous materials

Page 5: Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations.

Compliance Review DeterminationCompliance Review Determination

• Certain violations given numerical weight

• Final safety fitness calculated

– Satisfactory

– Conditional

– Unsatisfactory

Page 6: Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations.

Safety Rating CalculationSafety Rating Calculation

• FMCSA: All six factors weighed equally

• NTSB: Two most important factors are vehicle and driver

Page 7: Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations.

NTSB AccidentsNTSB Accidents

• Indianapolis, Indiana, 1995– 2 fatal– Significant driver, vehicle violations– H-99-6 issued

• NTSB’s Most Wanted List– H-99-6 added May 2000

• Mountainburg, Arkansas, 2001– 3 fatal– Significant driver, vehicle issues– H-99-6 reiterated

Page 8: Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations.

Additional AccidentsAdditional Accidents

• Victor, New York, 2002– 5 fatal– Significant driver, vehicle violations

• Wilmer, Texas, 2005– 23 fatal– Significant driver, vehicle violations

Page 9: Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations.

FMCSA Response to H-99-6FMCSA Response to H-99-6• Reviewing safety rating method• CSA 2010 Initiative• New rating method by 2010 dependent

on– Legislation– Rulemaking– Pilot testing– Training for deployment– Implementation

Page 10: Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations.

Compliance Review RatingCompliance Review Rating• Violations of Federal safety regulations

– “Acute”

– “Critical”

– Unrated violations not used in safety rating

• Scenario of 100% noncompliance with unrated violations– “Satisfactory” carrier even with safety

violations

Page 11: Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations.

Ineffective Rating MethodIneffective Rating Method

• NTSB investigations of “satisfactory” carriers with fatal accidents

• Compliance reviews (2005)– 8,097 completed, 96.7% with violations

– 65% resulted in satisfactory ratings

– 61,924 violations

– 53,069 violations unrated (85.7%)

• Method inconsistent with safety

Page 12: Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations.

SummarySummary

• Accidents will continue until CSA 2010 Initiative is completed

• With unrated violations in a carrier’s compliance review, safety violations occur without affecting safety rating

• Current program does not identify unsafe operators

• Interim measures necessary to improve current safety rating process

Page 13: Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations.