Top Banner
Office of Coast Survey / Coast Survey Development Lab Transition, Progress, Challenges and Future Directions Richard Patchen NOAA’S National Ocean Service IOOS SURA Shelf Hypoxia Meeting, 3-4 March 2011
13

Office of Coast Survey / Coast Survey Development Lab Transition, Progress, Challenges and Future Directions Richard Patchen NOAA’S National Ocean Service.

Jan 01, 2016

Download

Documents

Shanon Bennett
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Office of Coast Survey / Coast Survey Development Lab Transition, Progress, Challenges and Future Directions Richard Patchen NOAA’S National Ocean Service.

O ffi c e o f C o a s t S u r v e y / C o a s t S u r v e y D e v e l o p m e n t L a b

Transition, Progress, Challenges and Future Directions

Richard Patchen

NOAA’S National Ocean Service

IOOS SURA Shelf Hypoxia Meeting, 3-4 March 2011

Page 2: Office of Coast Survey / Coast Survey Development Lab Transition, Progress, Challenges and Future Directions Richard Patchen NOAA’S National Ocean Service.

O ffi c e o f C o a s t S u r v e y / C o a s t S u r v e y D e v e l o p m e n t L a b

The Pathway from Research to Operations and Applications

NOS CSDL actively manage these interfaces, through

community modeling partnerships

Research and Development

Academia, IOOS Regional Associations, Research

components of NOAA & other Fed

Agencies Private Sector

Evaluation and Testing,

Development, Transition to Operations

OperationsValue Added

Product Development

IOOS SURA TESTBED

Page 3: Office of Coast Survey / Coast Survey Development Lab Transition, Progress, Challenges and Future Directions Richard Patchen NOAA’S National Ocean Service.

O ffi c e o f C o a s t S u r v e y / C o a s t S u r v e y D e v e l o p m e n t L a b

CSDL Prototype Testbed: The Delaware Bay Model Evaluation Environment

ROMS, POM, ADCIRC, FVCOM, ELCIRC, SELFE, ....

COMMUNITY MODELS

Cape

Henlopen

Cape May

Maurice Rive

r

Bridgeto

n

Model Hindcast

Grids, Bathymetry, Environmental conditions

GridsBathymetry

Metrics

Historical Data Environmental conditions

Page 4: Office of Coast Survey / Coast Survey Development Lab Transition, Progress, Challenges and Future Directions Richard Patchen NOAA’S National Ocean Service.

O ffi c e o f C o a s t S u r v e y / C o a s t S u r v e y D e v e l o p m e n t L a b

1. CBOFS2 - original synoptic hindcast run (06/01/2003 - 08/31/2005) 2. As [1] but with river S = 03. As [1] but with river Q scaled with Wen Long's weights4. As [1] but with river S = 0 and river Q scaled with Wen Long's weights 5. As [1] but with twice the number of vertical levels (same sigma formulation,

Nz=40) 6. As [1] but with a nearly uniform vertical grid with the same number of levels

(Nz=20) 7. As [1] but with ROMS 4th order Akima vertical T/S discretization & with vertical

splines 8. As [1] but with ROMS 4th order Akima vertical T/S discretization & without

vertical splines

For 1. – 6., we used spline vertical advection in the vertical for T/S advection with vertical splines.

Chesapeake Bay Hypoxia TeamModel Parameter Evaluation --- Model Metrics

Page 5: Office of Coast Survey / Coast Survey Development Lab Transition, Progress, Challenges and Future Directions Richard Patchen NOAA’S National Ocean Service.

O ffi c e o f C o a s t S u r v e y / C o a s t S u r v e y D e v e l o p m e n t L a b

Individual Port Model Systems

Transition to a Regional Modeling Approach

Regional Model SystemsModeling Issues

1. Regional/Basin Model Nesting

2. Data Assimilation3. Expanded Need for

Comprehensive Data Sets

4. Regional vs. Local Metrics

IOOS SURA TESTBED

Page 6: Office of Coast Survey / Coast Survey Development Lab Transition, Progress, Challenges and Future Directions Richard Patchen NOAA’S National Ocean Service.

O ffi c e o f C o a s t S u r v e y / C o a s t S u r v e y D e v e l o p m e n t L a b

Coupling of Basin Model to Shelf/Estuary Model

IOOS SURA Shelf Hypoxia Team Activities

1. Investigate nesting algorithms/methodology, sensitivity and Robustness with Hetland’s MCH shelf model (ROMS) with Navy and NGOM

2. NOS’s Northern Gulf Operational Forecast System (NGOFS) (FVCOM) with Navy and NGOM

Page 7: Office of Coast Survey / Coast Survey Development Lab Transition, Progress, Challenges and Future Directions Richard Patchen NOAA’S National Ocean Service.

O ffi c e o f C o a s t S u r v e y / C o a s t S u r v e y D e v e l o p m e n t L a b

Ecosystem Applications of Circulation ModelsNoxious biota - Sea nettle probabilities

Salinity

SST Likelihood of Chrysaora

Hazardous Materials Transport

Harmful Algal Blooms – Red Tide West Florida Shelf

Page 8: Office of Coast Survey / Coast Survey Development Lab Transition, Progress, Challenges and Future Directions Richard Patchen NOAA’S National Ocean Service.

O ffi c e o f C o a s t S u r v e y / C o a s t S u r v e y D e v e l o p m e n t L a b

3D Nested/Coupled ModelModel Results

Tracer patch method : Passive/Inert tracer evolution within ROMSParticle tracking method : CSDL’s Chesapeake Bay Oyster Larvae Tracker (CBOLT)

Observed Initial Patch Digitized Initial Patch

Initialization HAB patch

7-day Hindcast

Need 3D velocities as 2D depth-averaged velocities miss near-

shore upwelling behavior

Page 9: Office of Coast Survey / Coast Survey Development Lab Transition, Progress, Challenges and Future Directions Richard Patchen NOAA’S National Ocean Service.

O ffi c e o f C o a s t S u r v e y / C o a s t S u r v e y D e v e l o p m e n t L a b

IOOS SURA Testbed Estuarine Hypoxia Team

• Model : examine hypoxia via DO using a 1-equation model with constant respiration (Malcolm Scully/ODU)

• Model Set-up : embed DO model within NOAA/NOS Chesapeake Bay Operational Forecast System (CBOFS)

DO in ROMS is a passive/inert tracer• Simulation : synoptic hindcast from June 01,

2003 - August 31, 2005• ICs and BCs : DO saturation from T and S [Weiss

(1970)]; no river DO sources• Computational Efficiency : 6-day sim./hour [MPI,

IBM Power 6 cluster , 96 proc.]

Const. resp. rate of 0.55 gO2/m3/day

Fixed at saturation (surface also)

Strategy – begin with simplest WQ model and then build up to complex models

Page 10: Office of Coast Survey / Coast Survey Development Lab Transition, Progress, Challenges and Future Directions Richard Patchen NOAA’S National Ocean Service.

O ffi c e o f C o a s t S u r v e y / C o a s t S u r v e y D e v e l o p m e n t L a b

• Total DO content (kg) diminishes during the summer months as expected• Hypoxic volumes show agreement with those derived from CBP

observations*• Hypoxic zones present in deep, narrow channels during summer months*Courtesy of Malcolm Scully/ODU and Rebecca Murphy/JHU

DO ≤ 2 mg/L at 1m above botm.

DO ≤ 2 mg/L

DO ≤ 1 mg/L

DO ≤ 0.2 mg/L

IOOS SURA Testbed Estuarine Hypoxia TeamPreliminary Results

Page 11: Office of Coast Survey / Coast Survey Development Lab Transition, Progress, Challenges and Future Directions Richard Patchen NOAA’S National Ocean Service.

O ffi c e o f C o a s t S u r v e y / C o a s t S u r v e y D e v e l o p m e n t L a b

NOS Work Plans

Import ChesROMS biological module (based on Fennel’s) into CBOSF2 Compare DO predictions (and others if

available) from various models (e.g. Scully’s 1-term, Fennel’s and ICM) Transition to operational ecological forecasting?

IOOS SURA Testbed Estuarine Hypoxia Team

Page 12: Office of Coast Survey / Coast Survey Development Lab Transition, Progress, Challenges and Future Directions Richard Patchen NOAA’S National Ocean Service.

O ffi c e o f C o a s t S u r v e y / C o a s t S u r v e y D e v e l o p m e n t L a b

NOS Work Plan Evaluate the embedded biological models in FVCOM Import Fennel’s model and its set-up for GOM into FVCOM Model comparisons of various biological configuration and ROMS vs FVCOM Transition to operational ecological forecasting?

IOOS SURA Testbed Shelf Hypoxia Team

Page 13: Office of Coast Survey / Coast Survey Development Lab Transition, Progress, Challenges and Future Directions Richard Patchen NOAA’S National Ocean Service.

O ffi c e o f C o a s t S u r v e y / C o a s t S u r v e y D e v e l o p m e n t L a b

Summary and Conclusions

• The IOOS SURA Testbed supports previous/ongoing efforts to evaluate new modeling approaches and metrics.

• The IOOS SURA Shelf Testbed is consistent with a transition from Port based Operational Forecast System to a Regional Approach by expanding effort of testing and validation of competing basin/shelf nesting approaches.

• The IOOS SURA Testbed accelerated efforts to evaluate various approaches to address ecological issues, i.e., Hypoxia