Off-Shore Windpark Projekt Kaliningrad. The Squad Prof. Andrey Nikishin Gilbert Duee Berno Hellauer Max Mueller Andreas Rembold Aurelio Schug Abbas Seifeddine.

Off-Shore Windpark Projekt

Kaliningrad

The Squad

Prof. Andrey Nikishin

• Gilbert Duee

• Berno Hellauer

• Max Mueller

• Andreas Rembold

• Aurelio Schug

• Abbas Seifeddine

• Moritz Schneider

• Kevin Weber

• Sebastian Westphal

Table of contents

1 - Aims of the project2 - What we did in the project3 - Installation Site Selection4 - Power production assessment5 - Environmental Review6 - Interconnection Studies7 - Financial Aspects8 – Conclusion and Proposals

1 - Aims of the Project

• convince Russia to build offshore windfarms

• basic planning of 115/130MW windfarm in

Kaliningrad region

• feasibility study

2 - What we did in the project

Collect information:

- technical

- legislative

- financial aspects

Basic planning and feasibilty calculation of offshore windfarms for Kaliningrad region

Conclusions and proposals

2 - What we did in the project

• Our project includes:

• Installation Site Selection

• Power production assessment

• Environmental Review

• Interconnection Studies

• Financial Aspects

3 - Installation site selection

3 - Installation site selection

3 - Installation site selection

3 - Installation site selection

Kaliningrad region of Russian Federation

115 MW

130 MW

Lithuania Baltic sea . Vav = 9,2 m/s

. Vav = 8,5 m/s

4 - Power production assessment

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

0 5 10 15 20 25

Скорость ветра, м/с

Мо

щн

ост

ь В

ЭУ

, кВ

т

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0 5 10 15 20 25

Скорость ветра, м/с

Час

тота

по

яв

лен

ия

Рэй

ли

ха,

%Vср=6 м/с Vср=5 м/сVср=7 м/с Vср=8 м/сVср=9 м/с Vср=10 м/с

00)(z

zzav

225,0

·4

5,0·

4,

av

i

av

i

v

v

v

v

iy eef

i

yeariiyWTyear TPfW ··,WTyearWFarm WnW

Annual wind speed m/sWind speed m/s

P, kW fy,i %

5 - Environmental review

EIA and ecological assessmentEIA procedure promotes decision making on realization of planned

activity taking into account:

• possible adverse effects and environmental consequences;

• public opinion;

• working out measures of decreasing and prevention of effects

EIA is carried out in few steps. 1. Preliminary assessments for requirements specification development

of EIA. 2. Requirements specification making.3. EIA investigations.4. Preparation of preliminary EIA.5. Public discussions.

6 - Interconnection studies

4 – Financial aspects

Pnom -

Ins. Cost -

Payback period –

Data

WF1

• Pnom: 115 MW• n-ntur: 58• Van: 9.2 m/s• Ean: 489 GWh• Total cost: 192 Mio €• Paybackperiod: • In Rus: ca. 8 Years• In Ger: ca. 3 Years• Ins. costs: 1717 €/kW

WF2

• Pnom: 130 MW• n-ntur: 65• Van: 8.5 m/s• Ean: 562 GWh• Total cost: 225 Mio €• Paybackperiod:• In Rus: ca. 7 Years• In Ger: ca. 3 Years• Ins. costs: 1718 €/kW

8 – Conclusions

Kaliningrad region has a good perspectives for offshore wind power development

•No offshore wind energy development program;

•No standards for evaluation of environmental and other impacts;

•No other guiding documents;

•No stimulation for production of wind electricity;

•No one-desk policy;

•Favorable wind conditions;

•Enough place in suitable depths

•Minimum environmental conflicts

•Economically feasible

•Growing interest by investors

•Possibilities for connection to the grid

8 - Proposals

1. Use the experience of EU to prepare normative documentation and standards.

2. Financial stimulation for green power in Russia.

3. Encoureging the local people to accept such projects.

4. Use the modern wind power technology