Off-Grid Solar Power System Engineering Service Learning (Engr. 4692.01S) Zach Dombi, Vincent Mazzone Bradley “Scott” Valentine, Peter Worley 5/29/2014
Feb 10, 2016
Off-Grid Solar Power System
Engineering Service Learning (Engr. 4692.01S)
Zach Dombi, Vincent Mazzone
Bradley “Scott” Valentine, Peter Worley
5/29/2014
Presentation Topics1. Project Details
a. Backgroundb. Objectives
2. Design a. Processb. Electricalc. Mechanical
3. Post-Trip Resultsa. Issues Encounteredb. Objectives
Achieved/Deliverablesc. Sustainability and
Ownershipd. Cost Analysis
5. Conclusion6. References and
Acknowledgements
Introduction
Role Team Member Specialization
Team Leader Zach Dombi Electrical
Communication Peter Worley Mechanical
Documentation Scott Valentine Electrical
Financial Vincent Mazzone Chemical
Team Members
Background Information: Problem
● Model Home○ Stability○ Health○ Living Condition
● Residential Electricity ○ Lights○ Cellphone ○ Television○ Fans○ Refrigerator
Background Information: Goal● Vocational School Dorm
○ Model home plus wings○ 8 students
● Off-Grid Power○ Grid unreliable○ High rates○ Long term vision
● Wind Power Impractical
Need● Scope
o Construct pilot off-grid solar system at local home
o Power numerous applianceso 1 day autonomy
● Constraintso $1,400 budgeto Local partso Safetyo Replicable design
Objectives● Deliverables
o Functioning solar systemo Information and maintenance
packeto On-site testing
Power levels Completed circuit
o Economic Analysis Rate of return
Design Process1. Determine desired electrical devices2. Determine energy demand 3. Size inverter - max wattage
a. Max wattage4. Determine insolation or sun-hours/day5. Select solar panels
a. 15% inverter lossb. 16% 20 year loss
6. Size batteries - 50% depth7. Determine wire and circuit breakers
Pre-Trip Electrical Design● Panel 180 W
● Safety box
○ Battery - 105 Ah
○ Charge Controller - 15 A
○ Inverter - 450 W
● Light bulbs with strings
Pre-Trip Mechanical Design● Pole mount
● Security bolts
● Concrete foundation
In-Country Implementation● La Bonanza● Rural, impoverished
community● House does not have
its own grid connection
The House● Living room, kitchen, bedroom● 2 lights, one outlet● Unsafe
Electrical Box
● Protection from environment
● Child safety● Ventilation
Mount Frame● Scrap metal● Welded● Bolt panel to frame
Mount Pole● Two galvanized “canteletas” welded
together● Significantly cheaper than metal pole
○ $40 vs. $100● 13 feet
○ 4 feet in the ground○ 9 feet above the ground
The beams were laid on each other and welded along the seam every few feet on both sides.
Foundation● 2 foot diameter by 4 feet deep hole● Concrete with rebar● Ingenious Dzwonczyk Collar
Final Assembly
Location of Electrical Components within Home
Electrical Wiring● Four Outlets● Four Light
fixtures● One circuit
General Wiring Diagram
Issues Encountered● The amount of cement needed
● Alignment of the bolt holes
o Panel and mounting system
● Securing the wood platforms
● A short in the system
o Grounding error
● The iron
Objectives Achieved and Deliverables● Six main objectives/goals
● Local parts versus low cost
● Maintenance manual and a day of
education
● Under budget
Sustainability and Ownership● All major parts bought locally● Minor parts can be purchased in
country ● Aiding in the installation● Education seminar
Cost AnalysisTotal Cost: $1,177.23
● $1053.80 in Honduras all major solar panel components and other
miscellaneous items● $123.43 in United States
minor items (i.e. screws, outlets, fixtures)
Install Cost Utility Rate(monthly) Most Economical
Grid Connection $143 if < 150 kWh: freeif > 150 kWh: $0.24/kWh
X
Solar System (180 W) $1,177 if <30 kWh: free
Economic Analysis● If use > 200 kWh/month there is an economic case for solar● WGM compound uses ~ 220 kWh/month● WGM vocational school would use more
Install Cost
Energy Usage
Monthly Bill
Grid Connection $143 200 kWh $48
Solar System (1 kW) $4,500 200 kWh (provides)
0
Install Cost Simple Pay-Back Rate of Return
Solar System (1 kW) $4,500 7.8 years 12.8%
Non-Economic Analysis● Grid power erratic (frequent power outages)
● Remote villages unable to be grid-tiedo Islandso Hill/mountain sides
Conclusion
● Achieved goals set by scope of work
● Objectives adjusted while in country to account for new information
● Easily replicable if funds are able to be generated
● Ownership established
● Viable for use in areas with no possibility of grid access in the foreseen
future
Acknowledgments ● Roger and Mariant● Larry and Angie Overholt and WGM● Engineering Education Innovation Center● Solar Education and Outreach: Jason
Mulligan● Wiring Lab: Mike Lichtensteiger
References1. http://www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/othr/ics/2012/191162.htm2. https://www.worldcityweb.com/past-events/global-connections/7808-energy-forum-ways-to-cut-energy-costs-in-latin-america3. http://www.siliconsolar.com/off-grid-solar-systems.html4. http://tyconpower.com/products/images/world_insolation_map_04-1250x691%20%281%29.gif
Questions?