ESTA Agenda Page 1 of 2 July 17, 2015 BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE EASTERN SIERRA TRANSIT AUTHORITY Regular Meeting Friday July 17, 2015 Town of Mammoth Lakes Council Chambers Minaret Village Shopping Center, Suite Z Mammoth Lakes, California 10:00 a.m. Note: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if an individual requires special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact Eastern Sierra Transit at (760) 872-1901 or 800-922- 1930. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the Authority to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 13.102-35.104 ADA Title II ) 1. CALL TO ORDER DISPOSITION 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. PUBLIC COMMENT INFORMATION 5. EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER PRESENTATION INFORMATION 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ACTION Approval of minutes of the regular meeting of June 18, 2015 7. GOVERNING BOARD POSITIONS DISCUSSION/POSSIBLE ACTION Staff recommendation: The Board is requested to discuss a response to the letter from Mono County Counsel, Marshall Rudolph, requesting on behalf of the Mono County Board of Supervisors that the ESTA Board seek to amend the ESTA Joint Powers Agreement to allow for Mono County to appoint a member of the Mono County Social Services Transportation Advisory Council to serve on the ESTA Board of Directors, and to provide any desired direction to staff.
31
Embed
OF THE EASTERN SIERRA TRANSIT AUTHORITY · regular meeting of the Eastern Sierra Transit Authority ... would need to resign that positionin order to serve on ESTA ... under Government
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
ESTA Agenda Page 1 of 2 July 17, 2015
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
EASTERN SIERRA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Regular Meeting Friday July 17, 2015
Town of Mammoth Lakes Council Chambers Minaret Village Shopping Center, Suite Z
Mammoth Lakes, California 10:00 a.m.
Note: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if an individual requires special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact Eastern Sierra Transit at (760) 872-1901 or 800-922-1930. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the Authority to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 13.102-35.104 ADA Title II)
1. CALL TO ORDER DISPOSITION
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL 4. PUBLIC COMMENT INFORMATION 5. EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER PRESENTATION INFORMATION 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ACTION
Approval of minutes of the regular meeting of June 18, 2015 7. GOVERNING BOARD POSITIONS DISCUSSION/POSSIBLE ACTION
Staff recommendation: The Board is requested to discuss a response to the letter from Mono County Counsel, Marshall Rudolph, requesting on behalf of the Mono County Board of Supervisors that the ESTA Board seek to amend the ESTA Joint Powers Agreement to allow for Mono County to appoint a member of the Mono County Social Services Transportation Advisory Council to serve on the ESTA Board of Directors, and to provide any desired direction to staff.
ESTA Agenda Page 2 of 2 July 17, 2015
8. NON-BENEFITTED EMPLOYEE SICK LEAVE POLICY ACTION Staff recommendation: The Board is requested to approve a sick leave policy for non-benefitted ESTA employees providing state-mandated sick leave benefits in compliance with the Healthy Workplaces/Healthy Families Act.
9. BISHOP OPERATIONS YARD PROJECT AMENDMENT ACTION Staff recommendation: The Board is requested approve an increase of $70,000.00 to the contract with Doug Clair, Inc., for construction of the Bishop Operations Yard Phase 1 Project due to change orders which are necessary for modifications of existing utilities in the yard, and to provide a contingency fund.
10. FINANCIAL REPORT RECEIVE AND FILE
Year-to-date financial update for fiscal year 2014/15. 11. OPERATIONS REPORT RECEIVE AND FILE
June 2015 12. SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN UPDATE WORKSHOP INFORMATION
The consultants from LSC who are developing the update of ESTA’s Short Range Transit Plan will hold a workshop to inform the Board of the Short Range Transit Plan process and to obtain input from the Board regarding strategic future direction for the Authority.
13. REPORTS INFORMATION a. Board Members b. Executive Director 14. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 15. ADJOURNMENT ACTION (The next regular meeting is scheduled for August 21, 2015 at 10:00a.m.
in the City of Bishop)
ESTA Minutes June 18, 2015 Page 1 of 2
Agenda Item #6 July 17, 2015
EASTERN SIERRA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Minutes of Thursday June 18, 2015 Regular Meeting
The Board of Directors of the Eastern Sierra Transit Authority met at 12:00p.m. on Thursday, June 18, 2015 at the City of Bishop Council Chambers, Bishop California. The following members were present: Jeff Griffiths, Dan Totheroh, Karen Schwartz, Colin Fernie and Michael Raimondo. Directors Tim Alpers and Jim Ellis were absent. Susan Distel led the pledge of allegiance. Public Comment
The Chairperson opened the public comment period at 12:11p.m. There was no one from the public wishing to address the Board. Public comment was closed.
Approval of Minutes
Moved by Director Fernie and seconded by Director Totheroh to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of May 15, 2015. Motion carried 4-0, with Director Raimondo abstaining and with Directors Alpers and Ellis absent.
Financial Report Mr. Helm presented the Financial Report for the period ending June 15, 2015.
Operations Report
Mr. Helm presented the Operations Report for the month of May 2015.
Fiscal Year 2015/16 Budget
Mr. Helm presented the proposed budget for fiscal year 2015/16. Chairperson Griffiths requested Mr. Helm speak with the Inyo LTC regarding the projected LTF revenue projections for next year, Moved by Director Raimondo and seconded by Director Fernie to approve the fiscal year 2015/16 operating and capital budget as proposed. Motion carried 5-0 with Directors Alpers and Ellis absent.
Bishop Transit Yard Project Contract Award
Jill Batchelder presented a request to approve award of a contract for the construction of the Bishop Operations Yard Phase 1 project including asphalt pavement in the parking area, concrete pads for a bus wash area and maintenance area, curb, gutter, striping, storm drain catch basin, piping, sand-oil interceptor, and underground retention field . Moved by Director Totheroh and seconded by Director Schwartz to approve the construction contract with Doug Clair Inc. in the amount not to exceed $414,994.70 for the Bishop Operations Yard Phase 1 Project and authorize the Executive Director to sign all contract documents.
ESTA Minutes June 18, 2015 Page 2 of 2
Motion carried 5-0 with Directors Alpers and Ellis absent.
Trolley Purchase Authorization
Mr. Helm stated that ESTA was recently approved for $200,000.00 in funding for the purchase of a trolley bus through State Transportation Improvement Program grant funding through Mono County. Moved by Director Fernie and seconded by Director Raimondo to approve authorizing the Executive Director to purchase a State Transportation Improvement Program funded trolley bus through an approved purchasing cooperative or, alternately, through an in-house competitive procurement in an amount not to exceed $200,000.00. Motion carried 5-0 with Directors Alpers and Ellis absent.
Board Member Reports
Director Schwartz reported that she recently rode the Dial-A-Ride bus; the bus shelter at Kmart is in need of some maintenance and up keep. Director Raimondo reported Mammoth is gearing up for summer activities. Chairperson Griffiths reported he has picked up backpackers giving rides. Town is full with the High School Rodeo in town.
Executive Director Report
The Short Range Transit Plan process has kicked off. At the July Board meeting a workshop will be held with the consultants. Expanded services have been approved in the Town of Mammoth Lakes Mr. Helm received an email from Mono Legal Counsel asking if ESTA would consider a member of the Mono Social Services Advisory Committee filling the vacant Mono County seat on the ESTA Board
Future Agenda Items Short Range Transit Plan Workshop with the Board
Adjournment
The Chairperson adjourned the meeting at 1:18p.m. The next regular meeting of the Eastern Sierra Transit Authority Board of Directors is scheduled for July 17, 2015 in the Town of Mammoth Lakes.
Recorded & Prepared by: ______________________ Susan Distel Board Clerk Eastern Sierra Transit Authority
Agenda Item #7 July 17, 2015
STAFF REPORT
Subject: ESTA Governing Board Qualifications Initiated by: John Helm, Executive Director BACKGROUND: One of the two ESTA Board of Directors positions from Mono County has remained unfilled since January 2015 due to a conflict of interest on the part of the Mono County Supervisor who had been appointed to the ESTA Board, and an unwillingness on the part of the other potential Mono County Supervisors to relinquish their positions on the Local Transportation Commission. A letter to the ESTA Board of Directors has been received from the Chairman of the Mono County Board of Supervisors requesting that the ESTA Board consider amending the ESTA Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) to allow Mono County, or any other member entity, to appoint a member of the Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC) to the ESTA Board of Directors. ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION: Section 1.2 (GOVERNING BOARD) of the ESTA JPA states that the Authority shall be administered by a governing board, consisting of two members appointed by the governing board of each member entity, who shall be members of that member entity’s governing board. The three Mono County Supervisors who are eligible to be appointed to serve as Directors for ESTA have indicated that they do not wish to relinquish their seat with the Local Transportation Commission. The Mono County Counsel has previously opined that an official may not serve concurrently on both the Local Transportation Commission and the ESTA Board. In accordance with the current ESTA JPA provisions, in order to serve on the ESTA Board, one of the three Mono County Supervisors currently serving as an LTC Commissioner would need to resign that position in order to serve on ESTA’s Board. None of the Supervisors has indicated an interest in doing so.
The Chairman of the Mono County Board of Supervisors, Tim Fesko, forwarded a letter to the ESTA Board earlier this month requesting that the Board consider amendment of the JPA to allow one of the two members appointed by the member entity to ESTA’s Board to be a member of the Social Service Transportation Advisory Council rather than the member entity’s governing board. Amendment of the ESTA JPA would require the approval of the governing bodies of all of ESTA’s member entities. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS None. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS In response to a request from ESTA staff regarding legal considerations related to this matter, John Vallejo, Mono County Deputy County Counsel, has indicated that ESTA may lawfully amend its JPA to eliminate the requirement that only elected officials from member entities serve on its Board of Directors. RECOMMENDATION The Board is requested to provide direction to staff regarding the request by the Mono County Board of Supervisors to amend the ESTA JPA in order to allow a member of the Social Service Transportation Advisory Council to serve on the ESTA Board of Directors.
_________________________________________________________________________________________ Larry Johnston - District One Fred Stump - District Two
Tim Alpers - District Three Tim Fesko - District Four Stacy Corless - District Five
July 8, 2015 ESTA Governing Board c/o John Helm, Executive Director P.O. Box 1357 Bishop, CA 93515 RE: Mono County request for ESTA JPA amendment Dear ESTA Board members: The Mono County Board of Supervisors respectfully requests your consideration of a proposed amendment to the ESTA Joint Powers Agreement (ESTA JPA) allowing Mono County – or conceivably any member entity of ESTA -- to appoint as one of its two members on the ESTA governing board a member of the Local Transportation Commission’s Social Services Transportation Advisory Council. Background information regarding the nature of such Advisory Councils is enclosed. We believe that Advisory Council members have a perspective and knowledge regarding the transportation needs of the public similar to that of an elected official. As such, their qualifications to serve on the ESTA Board would be consistent with the spirit of the current JPA language and with what we understand to be your Board’s position that ESTA Board members should be elected officials. By way of background, which you may already know, the reason for Mono County’s request to amend the current ESTA JPA is that our county counsel’s office has previously opined that the ESTA governing board and the Local Transportation Commission (LTC) are “incompatible offices” under state law, meaning a person cannot simultaneously hold both offices. Mono County Supervisors Stump, Fesko, and Johnston presently serve on the LTC are thus ineligible to also serve on the ESTA Board. And our county counsel’s office has determined that Supervisor Corless would have an incurable conflict of interest under Government Code section 1090 with respect to the anticipated renewal of an existing contract between ESTA and Mammoth Mountain, effectively preventing her from serving on the ESTA Board. Thus, only Supervisor Alpers is presently eligible to serve on the ESTA Board. Relevant County staff will be present at the next ESTA Board meeting, where we understand this item will be on the agenda, to help explain the County’s position and answer any questions your Board may have. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely,
Supervisor Timothy E Fesko Chairman of the Board, County of Mono 530-208-6259
SOCIAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COUNCIL 99238.
Each transportation planning agency shall provide for the establishment of a social services transportation advisory council for each county, or counties operating under a joint powers agreement, which is not subject to the apportionment restriction established in Section 99232. (a) The social services transportation advisory council shall consist of the following members:
(1) One representative of potential transit users who is 60 years of age or older. (2) One representative of potential transit users who is handicapped. (3) Two representatives of the local social service providers for seniors, including one representative of a social service transportation provider, if one exists. (4) Two representatives of local social service providers for the handicapped, including one representative of a social service transportation provider, if one exists. (5) One representative of a local social service provider for persons of limited means. (6) Two representatives from the local consolidated transportation service agency, designated pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 15975 of the Government Code, if one exists, including one representative from an operator, if one exists. (7) The transportation-planning agency may appoint additional members in accordance with the procedure prescribed in subdivision (b).
(b) Members of the social services transportation advisory council shall be appointed by the transportation planning agency which shall recruit candidates for appointment from a broad representation of social service and transit providers representing the elderly, the handicapped, and persons of limited means. In appointing council members, the transportation-planning agency shall strive to attain geographic and minority representation among council members. Of the initial appointments to the council, one-third of them shall be for a one-year term, one-third shall be for a two-year term, and one-third shall be for a three-year term. Subsequent to the initial appointment, the term of appointment shall be for three years, which may be renewed for an additional three-year term. The transportation planning agency may, at its discretion, delegate its responsibilities for appointment pursuant to this subdivision to the board of supervisors. (c) The social services transportation advisory council shall have the following responsibilities:
(1) Annually participate in the identification of transit needs in the jurisdiction, including unmet transit needs that may exist within the jurisdiction of the council and that may be reasonable to meet by establishing or contracting for new public transportation or specialized transportation services or by expanding existing services.
(2) Annually review and recommend action by the transportation-planning agency for the area within the jurisdiction of the council, which finds, by resolution, that (A) there are no unmet transit needs, (B) there are no unmet transit needs that are reasonable to meet, or (C) there are unmet transit needs, including needs that are reasonable to meet. (3) Advise the transportation-planning agency on any other major transit issues, including the coordination and consolidation of specialized transportation services.
(d) It is the intent of the Legislature that duplicative advisory councils shall not be established where transit advisory councils currently exist and that those existing advisory councils shall, instead, become part of the social services transportation advisory council and shall assume any new responsibilities pursuant to this section.
Agenda Item #8 July 17, 2015
STAFF REPORT
Subject: Non-Benefitted Employee Sick Leave Policy Initiated by: John Helm, Executive Director BACKGROUND: The Healthy Workplaces/Healthy Families Act (HWHFA) was approved by Governor Brown on September 10, 2014. The Act, which became effective July 1, 2015, mandates sick leave benefits for all employees in California who work for 30 or more days within a year. ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION: Previously, ESTA provided leave benefits that could be used for sick leave only to benefitted employees who work more than 1,000 hours in a year. In compliance with HWHFA, a draft policy has been created to document the benefits that ESTA will provide to non-benefitted employees who work 30 or more days within a year. Provisions of the policy include:
• An ESTA employee who does not otherwise receive leave accrued at a rate greater than provided by this policy and that can be used as sick leave shall be eligible for sick leave to be provided by this policy (non-covered employee)
• Non-covered employees shall accrue sick leave at the rate of one hour for every 30 hours worked.
• Non-covered employees may use sick leave accrued under this policy after 90 days of employment
• Accrual of sick leave under this policy rolls-over from one year to another, however, the accrual is capped at 48 hours
• Sick leave under this policy has no monetary value and may not be “cashed out”.
• Unused time under this policy is not paid out at the time of separation from employment.
The proposed Non-Benefitted Employee Sick Leave Policy is included on the following pages for the Board’s review.
FINANCIAL: Based on the payroll hours realized in fiscal year 2014/15, the total accrual under this policy would amount to $13,000 per year. The anticipated expense for this new benefit is included in the wages budgeted for FY 2014/15. LEGAL: The Non-Benefitted Employee Sick Leave policy has been reviewed for compliance with the HWHFA by John Vallejo, Mono County Deputy County Counsel RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Board approve the Non-Benefitted Employee Sick Leave policy, which provides state-mandated sick leave benefits in compliance with the Healthy Workplaces/Healthy Families Act.
NON-BENEFITTED EMPLOYEE SICK LEAVE POLICY (draft 07.17.15) The Eastern Sierra Transit Authority (ESTA) hereby adopts a policy to implement the Healthy Workplace, Healthy Families Act as follows:
A. Commencing July 1, 2015, any person employed by ESTA for thirty or more days over the course of the calendar year, who does not otherwise receive leave accrued at a rate greater than provided by this policy and that can be used as sick leave (“non-covered” employees), shall accrue paid sick days at the rate of one (1) hour per every thirty (30) hours worked during the calendar year.
B. A non-covered employee who is exempt from overtime requirements as an administrative, executive, or professional employee under a wage order of the Industrial Welfare Commission is deemed to work forty (40) hours per workweek for the purposes of this section, unless the employee's normal workweek is less than forty (40) hours, in which case the employee shall accrue paid sick days based upon that normal workweek.
C. A non-covered employee shall be entitled to use accrued paid sick days beginning on the ninetieth (90th) day of employment, after which day the employee may use paid sick leave as it is accrued.
D. Accrued paid sick leave shall carry over to the following year of employment. E. Accrual of sick leave under this policy shall be capped at 48 hours. F. Sick leave provided pursuant to this policy has no monetary value and may not
be “cashed out.” G. If the need for paid sick leave is foreseeable, the non-covered employee shall
provide reasonable advance notification. If the need for paid sick leave is unforeseeable, the non-covered employee shall provide notice of the need for the leave as soon as practicable.
H. Leave under this policy may be used in connection with the diagnosis, care or treatment of an existing health condition for, or the preventive care of, an employee or an employee’s immediate family member. “Family member” for purposes of this policy includes spouses, registered domestic partners, children (regardless of age), parents (including step-parents and parents-in-law), grandparents and siblings. Leave under this policy may also be used for employees who are the victims of domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking.
I. Unused time under this policy is not paid out at the time of separation from employment. However, employees who are re-employed with the company within a year of separation will have their accrued unused bank of time off under this policy made available to them.
J. Leave under this policy may run concurrently with leave taken under other applicable policies as well as under local, state or federal law, including leave taken pursuant to the California Family Rights Act (CFRA) or the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
Agenda Item #9 July 17, 2015
STAFF REPORT
Subject: Bishop Operations Yard Phase 1 Construction
Contract Amendment Initiated by: Jill Batchelder, Transit Analyst BACKGROUND: The contract for the construction of the Bishop Operations Yard Phase 1 project was approved by the Board at the June 2015 meeting. The contract award to Doug Clair, Inc. was in the amount of $414,994.70, which was the amount of firm’s bid. ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION: Construction commenced on the Bishop Operations Yard Project on July 9th. During the first days of construction, it was discovered that two underground electrical utilities, a 7,000 volt electric line that powers the airport’s runway lights, and a separate underground power line running between the light poles on the lot were too shallow for the design specifications for the project’s excavation. The remedy for this situation is to place a concrete cap over the 7,000 volt line, and to relocate, deeper the power line running between the light posts. The Change Order for the concrete cap work is $6,500.00 and the Change Order for the light pole power line relocation is estimated to total $10,000. In addition to these additional projects, ESTA staff was notified by Inyo County Public Works that the Fire Marshall had notified Public Works that the project would require a fire hydrant. The fire hydrant could be added to a planned change order to run a water line to the wash bay area and a water line stub to the location of a future administration building. The rough estimate from Public Works for the cost of the fire hydrant and water line is $40,000.00. In order to address further contingencies that may arise regarding the project, staff is recommending that an additional contingency amount of $13,500.00 (24%) be added to this contract amendment approval. The total proposed contract amendment amount is listed in the table below.
Change Order Amount Concrete cap over 7,000 volt power line $6,500.00 Relocate existing power line between light poles $10,000.00 Install fire hydrant and water line to wash bay and future admin building site
$40,000.00
Contingency $13,500.00 TOTAL $70,000.00 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: The funding that will be used for the Bishop Operations Yard Phase 1 Project includes Inyo County PTMISEA, Mono County PTMISEA Section 8879.55(a)(3) that are split between Inyo and Mono County Projects, and State Transit Assistance Funds that are identified for Capital projects. The Inyo County LTC approved an addition $198,740 in FY 2014/15 PTMISEA funds for the Bishop Airport Yard Project at the Commission’s June meeting.
Mono LTC PUC Section 8879.55(a)(3) (funds go through ESTA) $ 22,065.00 FY 2010-2011
State Transit Assistance Funds 25,050.70 FY 2013-2014 TOTAL $484,994.70
ESTA’s FY 2015/16 Budget will be amended to reflect the increased expenditures and revenue associated with the project amendment. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Board approve amendment of the agreement with Doug Clair, Inc. for the Bishop Operations Yard Phase 1 Project, to add $70,000.00, which will result in a not to exceed amount of $484,994.70, and to authorize the Executive Director to sign all contract amendment documents.
Agenda Item #10 July 17, 2015
STAFF REPORT
Subject: Financial Report Initiated by: John Helm, Executive Director Financial performance as FY 2014/15 is being closed out is post better than budget bottom line numbers with expenses at or below year-to-date budgeted percentages in most cost line items. Many significant expenses, fuel and maintenance costs from the Town of Mammoth Lakes in particular, lag the calendar in response to invoicing timing. Significant pass-through expenses for planning projects were not realized in FY 2014/15, but are expected to be finalized in FY 2015/16. The table below summarizes the expenses posted year-to-date by major expense category.
The roll-up, the budget unit summary, and the fund balance report for FY 2014/15 as prepared on July 14, 2015, are included on the following pages.
AID FROM OTHER GOVT AGENCIES4400 0.00 0.000.00 0.00CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES4600 465,624.00 54,312.14411,311.86 0.00OTHER REVENUE4900 0.00 (322.61)322.61 0.00
AID FROM OTHER GOVT AGENCIES4400 0.00 0.000.00 0.00CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES4600 882,916.00 (6,158.88)889,074.88 0.00OTHER REVENUE4900 0.00 (204.84)204.84 0.00
(6,363.72)882,916.00 0.00889,279.72Revenue Total:
Page
3
Date:
Time:
07/14/2015
15:33:48
User: JBATCHELDER - Jill Batchelder
Report: GL5005 - GL5005: Budget to Actual with
Budget to Actuals with Encumbrances by Key/Income GroupingCOUNTY OF INYO
REV USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY4350 0.00 (310.01)310.01 0.00CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES4600 0.00 0.000.00 0.00OTHER FINANCING SOURCES4800 0.00 (125,000.00)125,000.00 0.00
TAXES - SALES4060 43,034.00 26,412.1516,621.85 0.00AID FROM OTHER GOVT AGENCIES4400 43,034.00 2,678.3040,355.70 0.00CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES4600 29,734.00 (6,519.73)36,253.73 0.00
TAXES - SALES4060 32,503.00 22,476.2710,026.73 0.00AID FROM OTHER GOVT AGENCIES4400 32,503.00 (394.98)32,897.98 0.00CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES4600 19,400.00 (402.73)19,802.73 0.00
REV USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY4350 0.00 (38.82)38.82 0.00AID FROM OTHER GOVT AGENCIES4400 367,879.00 367,879.000.00 0.00OTHER REVENUE4900 0.00 (50.00)50.00 0.00
There were four comment received during the month of June 2015.
• June 15th - Passenger stated that he had not been provided accurate information regarding the last shuttle time during the first week of Reds Meadow Shuttle operation (reduced schedule the 1st week), and his party had missed the last bus out of the valley. Payment for the groups' fares was refunded due to the mix-up.
• June 25th - Passenger wrote to say that the Gray Line bus had passed his family by at Mammoth Creek Park. Driver was counseled to be more vigilant for passengers at bus stops.
• June 29th - Resident wrote to complain that the trolleys were driving too fast on Lakeview Blvd. Notice was posted and drivers were counseled to observe speed limits on all streets.
• June 30th - Trolley passenger called to state that the Trolley driver was rude to him and his daughter when attempting to load their bike on the vehicle rack. The driver was counseled on appropriate customer service.
COMPLAINTS PER 1,000 PASSENGERS
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
MONTH YEAR TO DATE MIN STANDARD
0.05
0.036
0.075
Operations Report June 2015 Page 6 of 7
Accident/Incidents
There were no preventable accidents in June 2015.
Missed Runs There was one missed runs in June 2015.
• June 30th – Benton to Bishop morning run was missed due to driver error
Road Call Frequency
There were two Road Calls during the month of June 2015. The rolling 12-month road call frequency is 0.76 per 100,000 miles traveled.
• June 19th – Lone Pine Express bus had a tire issue. Passengers were transferred to a new bus.
• June 22nd – The Lone Pine dial-a-ride bus had a radiator issue.
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50
Current Month Rolling 12-Month Average
Standard
0.00
1.09 1.25
PREVENTABLE ACCIDENTS PER 100K MILES
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
Jun 14 Aug 14 Oct 14 14-Dec 1-Feb 4/1/2015
Maintenance Road-Call Frequency - # per 100,000 miles
Current Month Rolling 12-month Avg.
Operations Report June 2015 Page 7 of 7
Bishop Area Dial-A-Ride Wait Times
Wait times for the Bishop Area Dial-A-Ride (Mon. through Fri., 7:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m.)
JUNE 2015
Percent Goal IMMEDIATE RESPONSE TRIPS
Total Trips: 1647 69 % of trips Average Wait Time (min.): 14 < 20 minutes # > 30 minute wait: 93 5.6% < 5% ADVANCE RESERVATION TRIPS
Total Trips: 748 31 % of trips On Time Trips (± 10 min.) 665 88.9% TOTAL SCHEDULED TRIPS 2,440 No-Shows 169/82 6.9% / 3.4 % Incl. / Excl. Ckpts Cancellations 45 1.9%