OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER (PMGSY), RAJASTHAN JAIPUR No.PMGSY/Accts/2016-17/D- 2O2 Date: Q2.o o g Sh. Rajesh Bhushan Joint secretary (RC) Ministry of Rural Development, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi-110 001 Sub: To submit PMGSY Programme Fund Statutory Audit Report for the year 2015-16. Sir, As per above cited subject kindly find enclosed herewith the Audited consolidated Balance Sheet, Receipt and Payment Account of RRRDA, Jaipur with the Audited Financial statement (State) Balance Sheet UC, Bank Reconciliation Statement, Bankers Certificate, Management Letter, Audit Report, Outputs of the relevant module of the OMMAS and a certificate from CEO that Maintenance funds required as per maintenance contracts enforce had been received for the previous financial year. Encls: As above Youraaithfully, ChiemEgAeer (PMGSY) No.PMGSY/Accts/2016-17/D- 2 9e Date: 29D. nq 1 Copy to fo wing with one copy of Audited Balance Sheet for information and necessa action:- 1. Dj ctor (F&A), NRRDA, 5th Floor, 15 NBCC, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066. 2. 6nior Financial Management Specialist, SARFM, World Bank 70, Lodi Estate, New Delhi-1 10003. Chief En ' r (PGSY) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Disclosure Authorized
54
Embed
OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER No.PMGSY/Accts/2016 …documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/325771475753978845/...OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER (PMGSY), RAJASTHAN JAIPUR No.PMGSY/Accts/2016-17/D-
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER (PMGSY), RAJASTHAN JAIPURNo.PMGSY/Accts/2016-17/D- 2O2 Date: Q2.o o g
Sub: To submit PMGSY Programme Fund Statutory Audit Report for the year2015-16.
Sir,As per above cited subject kindly find enclosed herewith the Audited consolidated
Balance Sheet, Receipt and Payment Account of RRRDA, Jaipur with the Audited Financialstatement (State) Balance Sheet UC, Bank Reconciliation Statement, Bankers Certificate,Management Letter, Audit Report, Outputs of the relevant module of the OMMAS and acertificate from CEO that Maintenance funds required as per maintenance contracts enforcehad been received for the previous financial year.
Encls: As above
Youraaithfully,
ChiemEgAeer (PMGSY)No.PMGSY/Accts/2016-17/D- 2 9e Date: 29D. nq 1Copy to fo wing with one copy of Audited Balance Sheet for information andnecessa action:-1. Dj ctor (F&A), NRRDA, 5th Floor, 15 NBCC, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066.2. 6nior Financial Management Specialist, SARFM, World Bank 70, Lodi Estate, New
Delhi-1 10003.
Chief En ' r (PGSY)
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNAOFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER (PMGSY) PWD, RAJASTHAN
We have appointed as Statutory auditor for auditing PMGSY Accounts of Programme Fundand Administrative Expenses Fund for State Unit of Rajasthan for the year 2015-16 videLetter No. PMGSY/Acctts./2016-1 7/D-52 Dated: 09.05.2016
SCOPE:
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted inIndia.Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonableassurance about whether the financial statements are free of material mis-statements. Anaudit includes examining on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosuresin the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principlesused and significant estimates made by the management as well as evaluating the overallfinancial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. In addition to above, during conducting the Audit we have attention on thefollowing:
i) All funds spent by RRRDA received from GOI/ World Bank under the said project hadbeen used in accordance with the conditions as laid in the PMGSY Guidelines/Operation Manual/ Financial Management Manual and only for the purpose for whichthe funds provided.
ii} All funds have been used in accordance with the relevant financial agreement with due
attention to economy and efficiency and only for the purpose for which they wereprovided.
iii) All expenditure including procurement of Goods and Services have the necessarysupporting documentation and have been incurred in accordance with the relevantGovernment Rules/procedure.
iv) Funds issued to the PIUs from the RRRDA for incurring expenditure are used for thepurposes intended.
v) The Projects accounts have been prepared in accordance with cons' liedrelevant accounting policies/ rules. O
0 2 I. . ~~ . 6
the Project have been tollowed and louna atequate.
vii) All the Observations are mentioned separately in the Audit Report of the ProgramFund & Administrative Expenses Fund respectively, which is annexed herewith.
OPINION
In our opinion, and best of our information and according to explanations given to us, thefinancial statements give a true and fair view of sources and application of funds and withrespect of statement of expenditure (SOE'S) Adequate supporting documentation has beenmaintained to support claims to the world bank for reimbursement of expenditureincurred and with reference to which expenditures are eligible for financing under loan/credit arrangement for the year 31st March, 2016.
For VINOD SIN s CO.PLACE: JAIPUR CHART TSDATE: 15.09.2016 R*f 0 26
YAL. 411040
PARTNER
PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNA
(STATE UNIT)
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES & NOTES ON ACCOUNTS1. The method of accounting is Cash Basis and recognize all the Receipts andPayments on cash basis, which is in contravention of AS-1, 5 & 9.
2. The Audit Observations are mentioned in the separate Audit Reports ofProgram Fund & Administrative Expenses Fund respectively.
3. We have not physically verified the road construction sites during the courseof audit, however the expenditure is verified on the basis of running bills ofcontractors and other supporting produce to us.
4. The Previous year's figures have been arranged, regrouped and reworked asand where necessary. Accounts and Financial Statements have beenprepared on the basis of guidelines issued by NRRDA for PMGSY Accountingmanual.
5. The Consolidated Balance Sheet has been compiled on the basis of auditedresults of 34 PIUs.
6. Fixed Asset register (durable Asset Register) was not maintained, hence notverified.
7. The Accounts follow the double entry system of Accounting and the Formatsof the accounts prescribed by the NRRDA in accordance with the PMGSYguidelines.
8. No Income & Expenditure A/c has been prepared because expenditure fromthe fund is entirely for creation of assets. Receipts & Payment and BalanceSheet have been prepared in accordance with PMGSY guidelines.
9. Bills of Contractors for works done have been charged to accounts only afterchecking and payment which are simultaneous. It has followed the system ofrecording the payments of bills only after the bills has been checked for itscorrectness and passed for payment. It does not follow the system of creatingthe liability on receipt of the running account bill for work done andmeasured.
10.The figures of the Accounts for the previous and current year are progressiveas per the requirements of NRRDA.
11.Incidental Funds generated from the Interest and other net incidentalReceipts upto 31 March 2015 Rs.167,885,667.00, was transferred to theProgram Fund vide Order No. PMGSY/ACCT/2015 . dated14.09.2015
12.While checking the TRACES site (of 33 PIUs whose user ID & Password wasprovided to us), wherefrom the TDS Returns filed and any demandoutstanding on part of TDS deduction are checked, we have found that thereis outstanding demand of Rs.18,60,91,340.00 on the 33 PIUs, this demandhave to get rectified ASAP otherwise might lead to the heavy penalconsequenses. PIU Dausa have not provided us with the User ID & Passwordof TRACES site, even after many follow-ups, hence we can't verify theiroutstanding demand.
Details of PIU wise demands are follows:S.No. Name of PIU Demand in Rs. 'S.No. Name of PIU Demand in Rs.1. Ajmer 4,31,170.00 18. Jalore 9,050.002. Alwar 1,74,000.00 19. Jhalawar 4,69,910.oo3. Banswara 2,46,72,05000 20. Jhunjhunu 4,19,040.004. Baran 3,17,63o.oo 21. Jodhpur 3,47,520.005. Barmer 12,13,04,400.00 22. Karauli 8,26,660.oo6. Bharatpur 1,37,120.00 23. Kota 1,35,210.007. Bhilwara 19,02,700.00 24. Nagaur 1,37,240.008. Bikaner 79,61o.oo 25. Pali 19,96,77o.oo9. Bundi 184,91o.oo 26. Pratapgarh 7,48,050.0010. Chittorgarh iu,99,68o.oo 27. Raisamand 54,15,61o.ooI. Chum 11,26,620.00 28. Sawai Madhopur 78,450.0012. Deedwana 54,12,400.00 29. Sikar 2,32,790.0013. Dholpur 29,74,510.00 30. Sirohi 10,250.0014. Dungarpur 15,35,620.00 31. SriGanganagar 4,21,430.0015. Hanumangarli 32,29,390.00 .32. Tonk 5,16,36o.oo16. Jaipur Rural 20.00 33. Udaipur 10,63,280.0017. Jaisalmer 18,41,880.oo 34 DAUSA No ID/Password
GRAND TOTAL I 18,6o,91,34o.oo
We had already reported the same in the previous year's audit report as well,but no serious action was taken against this.
Also, this year, we have written a letter to your goodself on 18th May 2016, inwhich we have told you the situation of demands (PIU wise) at that time, butstill no serious action took place against it. It is therefore suggested todeploy a single agency to rectify all PIUs demands and also to file theirrespective quarterly TDS returns as a centralized authority, which can bequestioned if any further demand is raised in future.
Place : JAIPUR For VINOD SINGHAL & CO.Date : 15.09.2016 CHARTE UNTANTS,A L$ 9 58A6C
A .411040PARTNER
VinodSingial Co.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To,The Chief EngineerPWD (PMGSY), JaipurRajasthan
Report on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated Financial statements of PROGRAMFUND of PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNA of RAJASTHAN RURAL ROADDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, 6, Nirmal Bhawan, 2nd Floor, Block 'A', Opposite JaipurClub, Jacob Road, Jaipur-302006, Rajasthan, which comprises the Balance Sheet as at31st March, 2016, Receipt & Payment account for the year ended and a Summary ofsignificant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Managements Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is Responsible for the preparation of these Consolidated FinancialStatements that give a true and fair view of the consolidated financial position andconsolidated financial performance of the PROGRAM FUND, Pradhan Mantri Gram SadakYojna of, which comprises the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2016, Receipts & Paymentsaccount for the year then ended in accordance with the accounting principles generallyaccepted in India including Accounting Standards. This Responsibility includes the design,implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation andpresentation of the financial statements that give true and fair view and are free frommaterial misstatement, whether due to Fraud or error.
Auditor's Responsibility
Our Responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statementsbased on our audit. We conducted our Audit in accordance with the Standards onAuditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the World Bankguidelines. Those Standards and World Bank Guidelines require that we comply withethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assuranceabout whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts anddisclosure in the financial statements. The procedure selected depends on the auditor'sjudgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financialstatements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the Auditorconsiders internal control relevant to the Program Fund of the PRADHAN RAMSADAK YOJNA, preparation and fair presentation of the financial statemen todesign audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An Au sE 1 sevaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reason
207 22U
of the consolidated financial statements.
Further the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and audit are thereof onthe some assertions and Non-Compliances at the PiUs level as per Annexure -"A".
We believe that the Audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate toprovide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our Opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations givento us, the aforesaid consolidated financial statements give the information required by theWorld Bank guidelines in the manner so required and give a true and fair view of thesources and Application of funds and the consolidated financial position of PRADHANMANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNA project for the year ended 31st March 2016 in conformitywith the accounting principles subject to the Management Report and their Annexure inconformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India.
Report on other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required, we report that:
a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the bestof our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purposes of theAudit,
b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have beenkept by the PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA, Rajasthan so faras appears from our examination of such books,
c) The Balance sheet dealt with by this Report are in agreement with thebooks of Accounts,
* Since the inception of the Project at the State Level and PIUs,none of the PIUs have incurred any expenditure on thePlantation. We strongly recommend spending a considerableamount on the plantation so as to maintain a healthy eco systemand pollution free environment.
OBSERVATION AT THE PIU LEVEL
- GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
* It has been observed that the Insurance had not been carried outby the Contractors in the PIUs as per the terms of the ContractDocument. Few PIUs where insurance has been executed, eitherinsurances for Labour not taken or the insurance is not taken forthe stipulated period, i.e for the Defect Liability Period.
= In most of the PIUs, the Measurement Books (MBs) of theContractors were not available for the verification. We wereinformed that the MBs are kept at the sites, which are situatedremotely from the PIU office. Hence, we have not verified thesame.
* TDS on the Contractors' payments has been deducted at the timeof payment of Bill. It should be deducted at the time of giving theadvance as well.
* As we have gone through the TDS Returns filed by the PIUs andwe have noticed that many times either PAN or amount is wronglyfiled and due to this reason, there is outstanding demands(verified from TRACES) of total Rs.186,091,340.00. for 33 PIUs(except PIU Dausa, which had not provided us the USER ID &Password for the TRACES siteJ, which is a huge amount and thismight lead to heavy legal consequences. These demands pertainsfrom the FY 2007-08 till FY 2015-16, and can only be rectified byrevising all the effected TDS Returns of those periods.
I The Audit paras given in the . previous years Statutory Auditreports are . not rectified till the date of Audit, mainly relatedto non-deduction of LD and not taking NG urancesrequired.
1. In PIU AJMER-
We are not in the position to comment anything on the books of the PIU, as thefollowing documents were not provided to us for the purpose of verification:- TDS Returns
- Work Files of the Contracts
- Exemption Certificate (EC), & STP in case of Royalty
- The Measurement Books
- Statement of Total Number of Bidders
2. In PIU ALWAR -
1. In case of the Contract No. RJ 02 WB 27:
As per 'G Schedule' Bitumen VG-30 should be used for the seal coat and theConsumption statement was also in line with "G Schedule". As per the billsproduced for the payment, it was observed that 1.19 MT (70.13MT - 69.13MT) ofBitumen (VG-10) was used in place of Bitumen (VG-30), which is of lower qualityand hence violation of the G Schedule.
2. In case of the Contract No. RJ 02 WB 20:
The work contract was initially issued to M/s RK Construction Co., which waslater on takeover by M/s R.K. Jain Infra Project Pvt. Ltd. on 01.04.2013 and asper the agreement (which is already verified by us), all the assets and liabilitieswere transferred in the name of the Company M/s R.K. Jain Infra Projects Pvt.Ltd.
As the constitution was changed, the contract was completed by M/s R.K. InfraProjects Pvt. Ltd., but it was found that the certain bitumen purchase bills afterthe takeover date i.e.01.04.2013 amounting Rs.1488101.00 was in the name ofM/s RK construction Co. and the payment for the same is being made. Billsshould be in the name of M/s R.K.Jain Infra Project Pvt Ltd.Details of these wrong bills are given below:
Provider CRC No. Type Date Name Amount JinIOCL 662931593 VG-30 03.06.2013 RK 730769.00
This proves that these CRC's have been obtained by furnishing false information.
3. In PU BANSWARA -
1. In case of the Contract No. RJ 03 WB 50; RJ 03 WB 53:
: As per the Para no. 13 of the Contract, the contractor on his c ovidein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insuran 0,66r) the
stated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractor's risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period,hence project is now uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in jointnames of employer and contractor. Also Engineers Approval was not found inthe documents. This is the violation of the Contract terms.
2. In case of the Contract No. RJ 03 WB 38; RJ 03 WB 51:
: As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractor's risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period,hence project is now uninsured. Also Engineers Approval was not found in thedocuments. This is the violation of the Contract terms.
4. In PIU BARAN -
1. In case of the Contract No. RJ 04, WB 20, WB 21, WB 26A, WB 26B, WB 26C
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover fromthe Start date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts anddeductibles stated in the Contract data for the events are due to thecontractor's risk. Also such insurance policy and certificates of insuranceshall be delivered by the contractor to the Engineer for the Engineer'sapproval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period,hence project is now uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in jointnames of employer and contractor. Also Engineers Approval was not found inthe documents. This is the violation of the Contract terms.
2. In case of the Contract No. RJ 04 WB 21
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover fromthe Start date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts anddeductibles stated in the Contract data for the events are due to thecontractor's risk. Also such insurance policy and certificates of insuranceshall be delivered by the contractor to the Engineer for the Engineer'sapproval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period,hence project is now uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in jointnames of employer and contractor. Also Engineers Approval was not found inthe documents. This is the violation of the Contract terms.
Also Royalty of Rs. 28,140.00 has been deducted against the payment madeof a running bill under this contract. Rs. 2,000 out of Rs.28, 14 IVyalty
( PUR+
practice must oe avoiaea as it may attract interest payments.
5. In PIU BARMER -
1. In case of the Contract No. RJ 05 WB 78:
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, tlV contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to,the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period,hence project is now uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in jointnames of employer and contractor. Also Engineers Approval was not found inthe documents. This is the violation of the Contract terms.
Also in this Contract, EC is taken for 0.75% by the Contractor but in all thebills it is deducted @ 1%, which might get into litigation with the Contractor.
: As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period,hence project is now uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in jointnames of employer and contractor. Also Engineers Approval was not found inthe documents. This is the violation of the Contract terms.
3. In case of the contract No. RJ 05 WB 59:
: As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period,hence project is now uninsured. Also Engineers Approval was not found in thedocuments. This is the violation of the Contract terms.
6. In PIU BHILWARA -
1. In case of the Contract No. RJ 11 WB 49A; RJ 11 WB 38:As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his co dein thp- inint nqtmp., nf the P.mn1nvt-r &k the rnntrrtnr. 1n1.11rn r
statea in tne uontract cata ior tthe events are clue to the contractors risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period, andno insurance money of the party is withheld, hence project is now uninsured.The insurance has not been taken in joint names of employer and contractor.Also Engineers Approval was not found in the documents. This is the violation ofthe Contract terms.
7. In PIU BIKANER -
- In case of the Contract No. RJ 18 WB 20:
In this case M/s Dana Ram Shri Ram, as per "G schedule" SS-1 is to be used forPrimer Coat, but in this case all the bills for primer coat are of RS-1 along withreference of CRC's in the consumption statement. Further it is never possible touse RS- 1 in primer coat as per norms.The aforesaid case was verified by appropriate PIU Authority. As per technicalexpert, RS-1 can't be used in Primer Coat.Hence this is violation of the norms of the Contract.
Also as per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shallprovide in the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance coverfrom the Start date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts anddeductibles stated in the Contract data for the events are due to thecontractor's risk. Also such insurance policy and certificates of insurance shallbe delivered by the contractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approvalbefore the start date.
In this case the insurance has not been taken in joint names of employer andcontractor and not taken for the DLP period. Also Engineers Approval was notfound in the documents. This is the violation of the Contract terms.
8. In PIU BUNDI -
In case of the Contract No. RJ 09 WB, WB 20:
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this cases the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period,hence project is now uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in jointnames of employer and contractor. Also Engineers Approval was not found inthe documents. This is the violation of the Contract terms.
9. In PIU CHITTORGARH -
In case of the Contract No. RJ 10 WB 22 ; WB 28:
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the ioint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cove the
statea in tne Uontract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period,hence project is now uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in jointnames of employer and contractor. Also Engineers Approval was not found inthe documents. This is the violation of the Contract terms.
10. In PIU CHURU -
1. In case of the Contract No. RJ 11 WB 05:
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has been done for the 3 years in place of 5 years ofDefect Liability Period. Also Engineers Approval was not found in the documents.This is the violation of the Contract terms.
2. In case of the Contract No. RJ 11 WB 06:
: As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shallprovide in the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance coverfrom the Start date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts anddeductibles stated in the Contract data for the events are due to thecontractors risk. Also such insurance policy and certificates of insurance shallbe delivered by the contractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approvalbefore the start date.In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period,and no insurance money of the party is withheld, hence project is nowuninsured. The insurance has not been taken in joint names of employer andcontractor. Also Engineers Approval was not found in the documents. This is theviolation of the Contract terms.
11. In PIU DAUSA -
In case of the Contract No. RJ 12 WB 46:
Date of commencement of work was 03.08.2014 and the date of Completion ofthe project as per the work Award was 02.04.2015, but it was found that thework is still not completed till date and has been completed to the extent of80% (Approx.) only. As per the Clause 44.1 Document for PMGSY RajasthanContract, a penalty (Liquidated Damages) must be initiated to the maximumamount of 10% of the total work contract, which in this case amounts toRs.1,410,000.00. This amount must be deducted from the bill payments, butis deducted only to the extent of Rs. 450,000.00.
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cove m theStart date to the end of defect liability neriod. in the amounts and Aes
such insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.In this case the Insurance has not been done, hence project is uninsured. This isthe violation of the Contract terms.
12. In PIU DEEDWANA -
'Option C" has been availed by the contractors which requires PWD to deduct asum of equivalent amount on behalf of Mining Department. Same has beendeducted under the head "Miscellaneous Deposits" by the PWD Management.* Rs. 91,232.00 deduction from Miscellaneous Deposit on account of Transfer
Entry from PIU Nagaur.
13. In PIU DUNGARPUR -
1. In case of the Contract No. RJ 14 WB 16:
The contract for Rs.15,361,330.00 was taken in the name of M/s Shri TripuraSK (JV), i.e. as a Joint Venture. However, the work was carried out during thewhole contract as M/s Shri Tripura Construction Co., i.e. a proprietorshipconcern. Payment of the running bills and deduction of TDS has been doneaccording to proprietorship concern @ 1%. Also the EC taken and the bills arein the name of the Proprietorship concern. So, on the verification of thedocuments it is clear that the work was awarded to other party i.e. M/s -ShriTripura SK (JV) and the work is actually executed by another party i.e. M/sShri Tripura Construction Co.
This was reported in previous year's report as ell, but no action taken against it,else the payment is made and TDS is deducted in the name of proprietorshipconcern i.e. M/s Shri Tripura Construction Co.
2. In case of the Contract No. RJ 14 WB 89; WB 92:
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period,hence project is now uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in jointnames of employer and contractor. Also Engineers Approval was not found inthe documents. This is the violation of the Contract terms.
3. In case of the Contract No. RJ 14 WB 120:
: As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractor's risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance copy was not found in the workfileprovi
In this case EC @ 0.75% was deducted, however EC @ 1% was found in theworking file provided. The details are as follows:
Running Bill Amount Sales Tax Sales Tax to be DifferrenceBill No. (Rs.) Deducted (Rs.) Deducted (Rs.) (Rs.)Ist 5,383,419.00 40,376.00 53,834.00 13,459.00IInd 8,330,076.00 62,476.00 83,301.00 20,825.00
This is short deduction, which was not deducted later also, hence to be getdeducted from the future payments to the Contractor.
5. DPR survey payments are subject to TDS @ 10% as they fall in purview oftechnical services. But in all the payments for DPR survey's TDS is beingdeducted @ 2% in place of 10%.
14. In PIU JAIPUR RURAL -
1. In case of the Contract No. RJ 16 WB 87:
As per the Para No. 13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall provide inthe joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from the Startdate to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductibles stated inthe Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Also suchinsurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by the contractorto the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the insurance has been done only for 24 months of Defect LiabilityPeriod while the Defect Liability Period is 60 months. So the project is uninsuredfor the rest of 36 months. This is the violation of the contract terms.
The Original Bank Guarantees received from the contractor are kept in theDocument file of the contractor. The Details of these are as follows-A)Bank Guarantee No. 06680000614, Dated 16.04.2014, Amount Rs. 564,845/-B)Bank Guarantee No. 06680000514, Dated 16.04.2014, Amount Rs. 1,136,287/-C)Bank Guarantee No. 06680000414, Dated 16.04.2014, Amount Rs. 1,059,379/-
The Completion Date of the contract was 31.03.2015 but it has not been completedyet and no Liquidity Damages (LD) has been deducted. However Final Bill of thiscontract has not been passed, so the LD should be deducted from the finalpayment.
2. In case of the Contract No. RJ 16 WB 30A, RJ 16 WB 31:
The Completion Date of the contract was 31.01.2015 & this was extended till31.05.2015 but it has not been completed yet and no Liquidity Damages (LD) hasbeen deducted. However Final Bill of this contract has not been passed, so the LDshould be deducted from the final payment.
3. In case of the Contract No. RJ 16 WB 81:
As per the Para No. 13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall provide inthe joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from the Startdate to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductibles stated inthe Contract data for the events are due to the contractor's risk suchinsurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by / rn torto the Eneineer for the En2ineer's anroval before the start date.
In this. case the insurance has been clone only for 12 months of Defect LzabilityPeriod while the Defect Liability Period is 60 months. So the project is uninsured forthe rest of 48 months. This is the violation of the contract terms.
4. In case of the Contract No. RJ 16 WB 51:
As per the Para No. 13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall provide inthe joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from the Startdate to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductible's stated inthe Contract data for the events are due to the contractor's risk. Also suchinsurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by the contractorto the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the insurance has not been done. So the project is uninsured. HoweverPIU has deducted Rs.50,000.00 from first running bill payment for Insurance butthey have not get the work insured. This is the violation of the contract terms.PIU has deducted Rs. 241,349.00 against Royalty & Rs. 423,000.00 against VAT.But these are put under MD V head, therefore these are not yet deposited with theconcerned department.
5. In case of the Contract No. RJ 16 WB 99:
As per the Para No. 13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall provide inthe joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from the Startdate to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductibles stated inthe Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Also suchinsurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by the contractorto the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the insurance has been done only for 24 months of Defect LiabilityPeriod while the Defect Liability Period is 60 months. So the project is uninsured forthe rest of 36 months. This is the violation of the contract terms.The Completion Date of the contract was 30.04.2015 but it has not been completedyet. However Liquidity Damages (LD) of Rs. 200,000.00/- has been deducted from2n Running Bill but still the work is not yet completed, hence have to deduct moreLDfrom the future payments..
6. In case of the Contract No. RJ 16 WB 59:
As per the Para No. 13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall provide inthe joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from the Startdate to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductibles stated inthe Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Also suchinsurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by the contractorto the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the insurance has been done in the name of Contractor only. This is theviolation of the contract terms.
PIU has deducted Rs. 7,558.00 against Excise Duty. But this is put under MD Vhead, therefore this is not yet deposited with the concerned department.
7. In case of the Contract No. RJ 16 WB 33A, RJ 16 WB 48:
As per the Para No. 13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost de inthe joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cov r tart
ttle contract data tor tne events are aue to the contractors rls.K. Aiso sucninsurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by the contractorto the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the insurance has been done in the name of Contractor only. This is theviolation of the contract terms. Further insurance has been done only for 24 monthsof Defect Liability Period while the Defect Liability Period is 60 months. So the projectis uninsured for the rest of 36 months. This is the violation of the contract terms.
8. In case of the Contract No. RJ 16 WB 70:
As per the Para No. 13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall provide inthe joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from the Startdate to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductibles stated inthe Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Also suchinsurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by the contractorto the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the insurance has been done in the name of Contractor only. This isthe violation of the contract terms.
The Completion Date of the contract was 15.04.2015 but it has not been completedyet and no Liquidity Damages (LD) has been deducted. However Final Bill of thiscontract has not been passed, so the LD should be deducted from the final payment
9. In case of the Contract No. RJ 16 WB 30B:
As per the Para No. 13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall provide inthe joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from the Startdate to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductibles stated inthe Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Also suchinsurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by the contractorto the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the insurance has been done in the name of Contractor only. Furtherinsurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period. This is the violation of thecontract terms.
10. In case of the Contract No. RJ 16 WB 31:
As per the Para No. 13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall provide inthe joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from the Startdate to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductibles stated inthe Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Also suchinsurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by the contractorto the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the insurance has been done in the name of Contractor only. Furtherinsurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period. This is the violation ofthe contract terms.
The Completion Date of the contract was 06.10.2014 but it has not been completedyet and no Liquidity Damages (LD) has been deducted. However Final Bill of thiscontract has not been passed, so the LD should be deducted from the final p'ayment
15. In PIU JALORE -
1. In case of the Contract No. RJ 18 WB 42; RJ 18 WB 31:As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost s ein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance c
FRh4~ SC9
stated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractor's risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance copy was not found in the work file provided. Also noamount was withheld for not having insurance, which is violation of theContract.
2. In case of Contract No. RJ 18 WB 20; RJ 18 WB 14; RJ 18 WB 19; RJ 18 WB 3fAs per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractor's risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period,hence project is now uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in jointnames of employer and contractor. Also Engineers Approval was not found inthe documents. This is the violation of the Contract terms.
3. In case of Contract No. RJ 18 WB 34:
The contractor has obtained exemption certificate for 131.19 MT material(Bitumen & Emulsion) but actually it has consumed only 99.50 MT material(Bitumen & Emulsion). Thus Excise Duty should be recovered on balancequantity (i.e. 131.19 MT - 99.50 MT = 31.69 MT). But this has not beenrecovered yet.
16. In PIU JHALAWAR -
1. In case of the Contract No. RJ 19 WB 26:
Date of commencement of work was 17.01.2013 and date of Completion of theproject as per the work Award was 16.11.2013, and as per officials work hasbeen completed in the F.Y. 2015-16 but work Completion Certificate was notmade available for Audit. As per the Clause 44.1 Document for PMGSYRajasthan Contract, a penalty (Liquidated Damages) must be initiated to themaximum amount of 10% of the total work contract, which in this caseamounts to Rs. 5,189,633.90. This amount must be deducted from the billpayments, but is being deducted only Rs.1,000,000.00 in total which is less asper contract.
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall provide inthe joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from the Startdate to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductibles statedin the Contract data for the events are due to the contractor's risk. Also suchinsurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period, henceproject is now uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in joint names ofemployer and contractor. Also Engineers Approval was not found in thedocuments. This is the violation of the Contract terms. G
(~I~IP
Date of commencement of work was 17.01.2013 and date of Completion of theproject as per the work Award was 16.09.2013, and as per officials work has beencompleted in the F.Y. 2015-16 but work Completion Certificate was not madeavailable for Audit. As per the Clause 44.1 Document for PMGSY RajasthanContract, a penalty (Liquidated Damages) must be initiated to the maximumamount of 10% of the total work contract, which in this case amounts to Rs.2,518,811.10. This amount must be deducted from the bill payments, but isbeing deducted RS.350,000.00 in total which is less as per contract. Also, workextension certificate was not found at the work site.
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall provide inthe joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from the Startdate to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductibles stated inthe Contract data for the events are due to the contractor's risk. Also suchinsurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by the contractorto the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period, henceproject is now uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in joint names ofemployer and contractor. Also Engineers Approval was not found in the documents.This is the violation of the Contract terms.
17. In PIU JHUNJHUNU -
1. In case of the Contract RJ 20 WB 20:
: As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall provide inthe joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from the Startdate to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductibles stated inthe Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Also suchinsurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by the contractorto the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case Insurance was not in Joint Name and not for Defect Liability Period.
2. In case of the Contract RJ 20 WB 30:
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
-In this case the Insurance copy was not found
-Exemption Certificates were not available for Audit,
- Measurement Books were not available for Audit to determine whether thework has been completed on time since Final Running Bill did not mention theactual Measurement date.
3. In case of the Contract RJ 20 WB 27; RJ 20 WB 31:
: As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts an etiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contr Also
contractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start ciate.-In this case the Insurance copy was not found
-Exemption Certificates were not available for Audit,
18. In PIU JODHPUR -
1. In case of the Contract No. RJ 21 WE 82; RJ 21 WE 87; RJ 21 WE 84;RJ 21 WB 83 :
: As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance copy was not found in the work file provided.
2. DPR survey payments are subject to TDS @ 10% as they fall in purview oftechnical services. But in all the payments for DPR survey's TDS is beingdeducted @ 2% in place of 10%.
19. In PIU KOTA -
1. In case of the Contract No. RJ 23 WB 01:
Date of commencement of work was 27.06.2013 and the date of Completion ofthe project as per the work Award was 26.02.2014, but it was found that thework is still not completed till date. As per the Clause 44.1 Document forPMGSY Rajasthan Contract, a penalty (Liquidated Damages) must be initiatedto the maximum amount of 10% of the total work contract, which in this caseamounts to Rs.4,178,192.00 This amount must be deducted from the billpayments, which is not yet deducted. Till date only Rs. 100,000.00 wasdeducted as LD, which is inappropriate.
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance was taken for the period 2 7.06.2013 to 26.02.2014,while the Start date was 2 7.06.2013 and also that the project is now uninsured.Also Engineers Approval was not found in the documents. This is the violation ofthe Contract terms.
2. In case of the Contract No. RJ 23 WB-02:
Date of commencement of work was 24.06.2013 and the date of Completion ofthe project as per the work Award was 23.02.2014, but it was found that thework is still not completed till date. As per the Clause 44.1 Document forPMGSY Rajasthan Contract, a penalty (Liquidated Damages) must be initiatedto the maximum amount of 10% of the total work contract, Whi s caseamounts to Rs.1,046,445.00 This amount must be deduc s e bill
deducted as LD, which is inappropriate.
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost, shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance was taken for the period 31.01.2014 to 30.04.2014,while the Start date was 24.06.2013 and also that the project is now uninsured.Also Engineers Approval was not found in the documents. This is the violation ofthe Contract terms.
3. In case of the Contract No. RJ 23 WB-03:
Date of commencement of work was 27.06.2013 and the date of Completion ofthe project as per the work Award was 26.02.2014, but it was found that thework is still not completed till date. As per the Clause 44.1 Document forPMGSY Rajasthan Contract, a penalty (Liquidated Damages) must be initiatedto the maximum amount of 10% of the total work contract, which in this caseamounts to Rs.2,304,156.00 This amount must be deducted from the billpayments, which is not yet deducted. Till date only Rs.100,000.00 wasdeducted as LD, which is inappropriate.
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost, shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance was taken for the period 31.01.2014 to 30.04.2014,while the Start date was 27.06.2013 and also that the project is now uninsured.Also Engineers Approval was not found in the documents. This is the violation ofthe Contract terms.
20. In PIU NAGAUR -
1. In case of the Contract No. RJ 24 WB 37; RJ 24 WB 57:
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period,hence project is now uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in jointnames of employer and contractor. Also Engineers Approval was not found inthe documents. This is the violation of the Contract terms.
2. In case of the Contract No. RJ 24 WB 58; RJ 24 WB 52; RJ 24 WB 49; RJ 24WB 50; RJ 24 WB 56:As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost rovidein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insuranc the
stated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period,hence project is now uninsured. Also Engineers Approval was not found in thedocuments. This is the violation of the Contract terms.
3. In case of the Contract No. RJ 24 WB 37
Project was started on 09.03.2014 and completed on 08.10.2014. The WorkCompletion Certificate of the aforesaid project was not found.
As per the reply given by the management, it is there but not kept in the PIU.
Also Excise Duty Exemption Certificate was granted by PMGSY for Bitumenfor 116 MT but actual purchase of Bitumen by the contractor was 117.965 MTand Supplier is not Liable to Levy Excise duty on the basis of such Exemptioncertificate, so in this case it is the duty of PMGSY to deduct Excise duty on1.965 MT from the running bill of contractor and thereby deposit it to ExciseDepartment. This has not been done in the above case.
21. In PIU PALI -
1. In case of the Contract No. RJ 25 WB 12:
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance policy is "Employees Compensation Insurance Policy"i.e. only for 8 workers in place of "Contractor All Risk Policy" which isinadequate. Also Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period,hence project is now uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in jointnames of employer and contractor. Also Engineers Approval was not found inthe documents. This is the violation of the Contract terms.
2. In case of the Contract No. RJ 25 WB 13:
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance policy is 'Employees Compensation Insurance Policy"i.e. only for 4 workers in place of 'Contractor All Risk Policy" which isinadequate. Also Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period,hence project is now uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in jointnames of employer and contractor. Also Engineers Approval was not found inthe documents. This is the violation of the Contract terms. G
N 6C1 C)SAIPURIR6C
that are intended to be supplied to a project imanced (whether by a loan or agrant) by the World Bank are exempted from the whole of the duty of excise.For getting this Exemption the, contractor has to take a certificate fromGovernment for quantity to be utilized in performing the contract. If thecontractor has such certificate, than only he can purchase exempted material.
In this case certain bills of Bitumen (VG-30) were found in which exemptedmaterial was purchased. However Exemption Certificate (regarding ExciseDuty exemption) was not found in the working file provided.
The details of the exempted bills found in this package are as follows:
Date Type Quanti Amount Rs.27.11.2014 VG-30 18.86 905,329.0018.11.2014 VG-30 18.910 907,729.0004.12.2014 VG-30 19.310 853,797.00
If there is no exemption certificate issued, than the Excise duty so payable,must be deducted from the payments to Contractor and deposit with theExcise Department.
22. In PIU PRATAPGARH -
1. In case of the Contract No. RJ 33 WB 01, RJ 33 WB 05, RJ 33 WB 03:
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall provide inthe joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from the Startdate to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductibles stated inthe Contract data for the events are due to the contractor's risk. Also suchinsurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by the contractorto the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period, henceproject is now uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in joint names ofemployer and contractor. Also Engineers Approval was not found in the documents.This is the violation of the Contract terms.
2. In case of Contract No. RJ 33 WB 06:
- The contractor has obtained exemption certificate for 90.102 MT material(Bitumen) but actually it has consumed only. 89.016 MT material(Bitumen). Thus Excise Duty should be recovered on balance quantity (i.e.90.102 MT - 89.016 MT = 1.086 MT). But this has not been recovered yet.
- As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractor's risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period, henceproject is now uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in joint names ofemployer and contractor. Also Engineers Approval was not thedocuments. This is the violation of the Contract terms.
1. In case of the Contract No. RJ 26 WB 25; RJ 26 WB 29:
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period,hence project is now uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in jointnames of employer and contractor. Also Engineers Approval was not found inthe documents. This is the violation of the Contract terms.
2. In case of the Contract No. RJ 26 WB 30:
As per the Para no.07 of the Contract, The contractor may subcontract somepart of the construction work with the approval of the employer in writing, upto 25% of the contract price only. However the Contractor shall not be requiredto obtain any consent from the Employer for the purchase of Materials whichare in accordance with the standards specified in the Contract. But anundertaking must be taken, from the party, from whom the material has beenpurchased, that they have given the material to contractor for use in thecontract.
In this case "M/S Bhagwan Stone Crasher" has taken some material (Bitumen &Tack Coat) from "H.G. Infra Engineering Pvt. Ltd." but no undertaking was foundin the working file provided. Also as per explanation given by PIU managementand our verification of the provided bills and the audited books of H.G. InfraEngineering Pvt. Ltd. no proof of payment to the Company was produced andalso on demand, no Sales tax return of the HG Infra Engineering Put Ltd and ofM/s Bhagwan Stone Crusher were not provided which may have proved thatonly the material is purchased actually and also no outstanding balance wasshown in the audited books of M/s Bhagwan Stone Crusher. In absence of thesupporting documents, we are unable to verify the accuracy of the transactionsor bills.
Details of some of the bills (in name of H.G. Infra Engineering Pvt. Ltd.) are asfollows:
Product J Company CRC Bill No. Amount (Rs.)Tack Coat Hindustan Colas 1630752 610,268.00
Also as per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shallprovide in the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance coverfrom the Start date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts anddeductibles stated in the Contract data for the events are due to thecontractors risk. Also such insurance policy and certificates of insur e shallbe delivered by the contractor to the Engineer for the EnginetS- valbefore the start date. 1
in tis case the insurance copy was also not 1ound in the work file provided.
24. In PIU SAWAI MADHOPUR -In case of the Contract No. RJ 27 BN UG 18:
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall providein the joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from theStart date to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductiblesstated in the Contract data for the events are due to the contractor's risk. Alsosuch insurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by thecontractor to the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
The insurance has not been taken in joint names of employer and contractor.Also Engineers Approval was not found in the documents. This is the violation ofthe Contract terms.
PG for Rs. 4,038,850.00 is valid till only 31.03.2016, but as per agreement itshould be till 13.12.2020 which is not yet taken.
25. In PIU SKAR -
.1. In case of the Contract No. RJ 28 WB 34, WB 27, WB 28
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall provide inthe joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from the Startdate to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductibles stated inthe Contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Also suchinsurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by the contractorto the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period, hence project is nowuninsured. The insurance has not been taken in joint names of employer andcontractor. Also Engineers Approval was not found in the documents. This is theviolation of the Contract terms.
2. In case of the Contract No. RJ 28 WB 33, WB 36The insurance has not been taken in joint names of employer and contractor. AlsoEngineers Approval was not found in the documents. This is the violation of theContract terms.
26. In PIU TONK -
1. In case of the Contract No. RJ 31 WB 15 (A):
Date of commencement of work was 12.06.2014 and the would be date ofCompletion of the project as per the work Award was 21.02.2015, but it is notascertainable whether the work has been completed or not, since measurementbooks were not available for the audit. As per the Clause 44.1 Document forPMGSY Rajasthan Contract, a penalty (Liquidated Damages) must be initiated tothe maximum amount of 10% of the total work contract. This amount must bededucted from the bill payments, which is deducted to the extent of Rs.200000.00only. G
' JAIUR I*
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall provide inthe joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from the Startdate to the end of defect liability period, in the amounts and deductibles stated inthe Contract data for the events are due to the contractor's risk. Also suchinsurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by the contractorto the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
The Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period, hence project isnow uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in joint names of employer andcontractor. Also Engineers Approval was not found in the documents. This is theviolation of the Contract terms.
As per the Clause 44.1 Document for PMGSY Rajasthan Contract, a penalty(Liquidated Damages) must be initiated to the maximum amount of 10% of thetotal work contract. This amount must be deducted from the bill payments, butneither 3rd nor Final Running Bill mention the date of Measurement for the workdone nor the Measurement book mention the date of measurement or actual dateof completion, so it is not ascertainable that whether work has been completed ontime or not.
27. In PIU UDAIPUR -
1. In case of the Contract No. RJ 32 WB 103; RJ 32 WB 115; RJ 32 WB 89; RJ32 WB 101; RJ 32 WB 109; RJ 32 WB 114; RJ 32 WB 125
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall provide inthe joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from the startdate to the end of defect liability period, and the amounts and deductibles statedin the ccontract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Also suchinsurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by the contractorto the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period, henceproject is now uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in joint names ofemployer and contractor. This is the violation of the Contract terms.
2. In case of the Contract No. RJ 32 WB 123:
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on his cost shall provide inthe joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from the startdate to the end of defect liability period, and the amounts and deductibles statedin the contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Also suchinsurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by the contractorto the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance copy was not found in the contract file provided.
3. In case of the Contract No. RJ 32 WB 46:
Excise Duty Exemption Certificate was granted by PMGSY for Bitumen for 66.03MT, purchase of Bitumen by the contractor was 66.03 MT but the actualconsumption was 60.031 MT, in this case it is the duty of PMGSY to deductExcise duty on remaining 5.999 MT from the running bill of co or andthereby deposit it to Excise Department. This has not been do bove
('AI -
kAJ *R
As per the Para no.13 of the Contract, the contractor on rus cost snau proviae inthe joint names of the employer & the contractor, insurance cover from the startdate to the end of defect liability period, and the amounts and deductibles statedin the contract data for the events are due to the contractors risk. Also suchinsurance policy and certificates of insurance shall be delivered by the contractorto the Engineer for the Engineer's approval before the start date.
In this case the Insurance has not been done for the Defect Liability Period, henceproject is now uninsured. The insurance has not been taken in joint names ofemployer and contractor. This is the violation of the Contract terms.
4. In case of the following, payments were made for DPR Computer Job Work onwhich TDS should have been deducted at the rate of 10% under professionalservices, but TDS was deducted at the rate of 2% under Contract.i) Agreement No. 81/13-14ii) Agreement No. 66/14-15iii) Agreement No. 170/14-15iv) Agreement No. 168/14-15v) Agreement No. 169/14-15vi) Agreement No. 96/14-15
* JAIPUR
9d Acco
PMG(SY/F[2APMGSV PROGRAMME FUNDBalance Sheet of SRRDA
As at 3 1stMarch 2016Name of SRRDA: Rajasthan Rural Road Deviopment Agency Rajasthan Jaipur
LIABILITIESCAPITAL FUND AND LIABILITIES Schedule AmountProgramme Fund received from MoRD LI 1071879,98.105.00Funds received from the State Government for cost over-run (PMGSY/SCH/F-52AA)
Incidental Funds (from interest and other receipts) L2 3137,19,835.00(PMGSY/SCH/F-52B)
Miscellaneous Income L2 1852,50,985.00
(PMGSY/SCH/F-52B)Bank Authorisations Outstanding
L4Current Liabilities LPMGSY/SCHF-52D)
TOTAL 1076869,68,925.00
ASSETSFunds Transferred to PlUs
1042810,05,847.00Bank Balance with the Accredited Bank 33784,01,372.00Automatic Investments with the Accredited Bank _
Current Assets A4 275,61,706.00
(PMGSY/SCH/F-53D)
TOTAL 1076869,68,925.00
For Vinod Singhal & Co. RAJASTHAN RURAL ROADS VELO ENT AGENCYChartered AccountantsFRN:005 GAi
Balance Sheet as at 31" March 2016Name of StateCAPITAL FUND AND LIABILITIES Schedule AmountProgramme Fund received from Government of India L1 (PMGSY/SCH/F-52AA) 1038231,33,105.00Funds received from State Government for cost over-runs L1 (PMGSY/SCH/F-52AA) 33648,65,000.00Incidental Funds (from interest and other receipts) L2(PMGSY/SCH/F-52B) 3 137,19.835.00MisJellaneous Income
. 1095932,92,707.00ASSETSExpenditure on New Roads (Completed). financed by Al (PMGSY/SCH/F-53A) 754858,14.046.00MoRD
World BankAsian Development BankOthers
Expenditure on New Roads (in progress), financed byMoRDWorld BankAsian Development BankOthers
Expenditure on Up-gradation of Existing Roads (Completed), JA2 (PMGSY/SCH/F-53B) 307014.35,4 10.00Financed byMoRDWorld BankAsian Development BankOthers
Expenditure on Up-gradation of Existing Roads (in progress),Financed by
33784,01,372.00Automatic Investments with the accredited bankUn-reconciled programme fund transferred to PlUs L5(PMGSY/SCHIF-54)TOTAL
_ 1095932,92,707.00
C Co. ASTHAN RURAL R ADS V PM TA rY
Financial Advisor Se (RRRDA)(C. 'A(PartnreAcM.NO. 411040
Place: JaipurDated: 16.09.2015
PMGSY/F-lA (Annual)PMGSY PROGRAMME FUNDANNUAL ACCOUNT RECEIPTS AND PAYMENT (FOR SRRDA)FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 MARCH 2016Name of SRRDA: Rajasthan Rural Road Deviopment Agency Rajasthan JaipurAccount Head of Account
ReceiptsCode Current PreviousNumber
Year Year1 2
3 4I Opening Balancesa) Imprest with Staffb) Imprest with Staffc) Bank Balance with the accredited bank
a. in current account 22445,23,644.00 (1302,26,908.00)b. in automatic deposits
(717,56,303.00) 45105,14,593.0011 (i) Programme Funds received from GOI 55428,94,323.00 46548,55,518.00(ii) Funds received from the State Government for cost over-runs 31705,56,344.00 -III Income from automatic investment in the accredited bank 1751,15,754.00 1678,85,667 00IV Other Income(i) Miscellaneous Income
59,37,123.00V Deposits of Contractors and Suppliers 850,43,906.00 578,40,627.00VI Other Creditors
a) Cash in handb) Imprest with Staff .c) Bank Balance with the accredited bank
i) in current account 11069,39,238.62 22445,23,644.00ii) in automatic deposits 22714,62,133.38 (717,56,303.00)TOTAL
111461,04,319.00 92667,20,874.00F Co.
RAJASTHAN RURAL ROADS DE LOPM)T AGENCYCh dR
Financial Advisor Sec ta (R ROA)(C.A.(Partne ,dAccoM.NO. 411040
Place: JaipurDated : 16.09.2015
PMGSY PROGRAMME FUNDSCHEDULES FORMING PART OF BALANCE SHEET OF SRRDASchedule of Programme Fund Received by SRRDABalance Sheet as at 31st March 2016Name of SRRDA: Ralasthan Rural Road Devlopment Agency Rajasthan Jaipur___________SCHEDULE No. LI PMGSY Proranmme Fund
Current Year Previous YearL Programme Fund received from Ministry of Rural Development, GOTOpening Balance as per last year's 8alance Sheet
98,280,238,782.00 93,625,383.264 00Add: Received during the year
5,542.894,323.00 4,654,85.518.00Closing Balance.
103,823,133,105,00 98,280,238,782.00IL. Fund received from State Government to meet cost over-runs or its other commitments
Opening Balance as per last years Balance Sheet 194,308,656.00 194,308,656.00
Add: Received during the year 3,170,556,344.00Closing Balance
3,364,S65,000.00 194,308,656.00Total
107,187998105.00 98,474,547,43800
PMGS/SCI[/F-52BPMGSY PROGRAMME FUNDSCHEDULES FORMING PART OF BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31st March 2016Schedule of Incidental Funds and Miscellaneous IncomeName ofSRRDA: Rajasthan Rural Road Deviopment Agency Rajasthan JaipurSCHEDULE No L2 INCIDENTAL FUNDS AND MISCELLANEOUS INCOME: Current Year Previous 1 ear1. Incidental Funds (generated from nterest and other receipts) as per the last Balance Sheet 167,885,667.00 598,255.518 OC
Add: Received during the year 313,719,835.00 16?,85A667.00
Less: transferred to (State details and authority for the transfer) 167,885,667.00 598,255,51800Total 313,719,835.00 167,885,667.00
2. Miscellaneous Income (As per the lhst Balance Sheet) 155,969.399.00 150.032,27600
Add: Received during the year 165,250,965.00 5.37,123.00
Less: transferred to Incidental funds 155,969,399.00
PMGSVISCII1F-52CPMGSY PROGRAMME FUNDSCIIEDULES FORMING PART OF BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31st March 2016Schedule of Deposits RepayableName of SRRDA: Rajasthan Rural Road Devlopment Agency Rajasthan JaipurSCHEDULE No. L3- DEPOSITS PAYABLE Current Year Previous Year
1. Contractors & Supliers Outstanding atnount as per the last Balance Sheet 1,821,279,s76.00 1.763,439,249 00
Add: Received during the year 1,134,398,002.00 318,288,371.00
Less: Refunded during the year 1,049,354.096.00 260,447,744.00
TOTAL
1,906,323,782.00 1,821,279,876,00
PMGSWSCII/F-.2DPMGSY PROGRAMME FUNDSCHEDULES FORMING PART OF BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31st March 2016Schedule of Current LiabilitiesName of SRRDA Rajasthan Rural Road Devlopment Agency Rajasthan JaipurSCHEDULE No. L4 CURRENT LIABILITIES Current Year Previous Year
A. Statutory taxes to be psida) Itcome Tax (Income Tax. Surcharge and
184,513.00Education Cess to be shown separately)
as,83.00b).Commercial Tax
3.00c) Others
273,354.00B. UD-aid Bills_______________________C. Amount payable to the State Government
is.0n1GRAND TOTAL
273,39.co
*\APURJi
ed At1
PMGSY/SCHF-53DPMGSY PROGRAMME FUND
SCHEDULES FORMING PART OF BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31st March 2016SCHEDULE OF CURRENT ASSETS
Name of SRRDA: Rajasthan Rural Road Devlopment Agency Rajasthan Jaipur
SCHEDULE No. A4 - CURRENT ASSETS Current Year
Particulars Amount
A. Advances to contractors(j) Considered safe (completion date 3 months is not yet over) 411,869,578.00
(ii) Considered un-safe (completion dat- - 3 months are over) (387,596,751.001
B. Misc. Works Advance(al Against Contractors
(i) Considered safe (within completion date + 3 months)
(ii) Considered un-safe(b) Against Staff(c) Advances for DPR Preparation 3.288,87900
(d) Administrative Expenses approved by NRRDA/MoRD to be recovered
C. Administrative Expenses Recoi erable from the State Government
i) Outstanding for less than 6 months. .
ii) Outstanding for more than 6 months.
0. Other Items
Grand Total( A +8 + C +D) / 27,561,706.00
F n,26
A*r
PMGSY/SCII/F-53APMGSY PROGRAMME FUNDSCIIEDULES FORMING PART OF BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31st March 2016Schedule of Construction of New RoadsName of SRRDA : Rajasthan Rural Road Devlopment Agency Raasthan JaipurSCHEDULE No Al. - CONSTRUCTION OF NEW ROADS Amount Inner Column 2 (sub-total of Outer Column (Sub-total ofInner Column I Inner Col. 1) inner Col. 2)Serial No. Names of Roads1 2 3 4 5Part I Roads funded by the Ministry of Rural Development,
Completed Roads up to the end of the last year 41,625,083,776.00Completed during the Year 423,399,512.00Total Completed Roads
42,048,483,288.00 _Roads in Progress 599,422,214.00
Total for MoRD 42,647,905,502.00
Serial No. Names of Roads Amount Inner Column2 Outer ColumnInner Column I (sub-total of (Sub-total of innerInpr Cof. 1) Col, 2)1 2 3 4 5Part II Roads funded by the World Bank.
Completed Roads up to the end of the last year 17,283,409.584.00Completed during the Year 8,149,443,511.36Total Completed Roads
25,432,853,095.36Roads in Progress 7,405,055,448.64
Total for World Bank 32,837,908,544.00
Serial No. Names of Roads Amount Inner Column 2 Outer ColumnInner Column I (sub-total of (Sub-total of innerInnerCo, I Cof, 2)1 2 3 4 5Part III Roads funded by the Asian Development Bank
Completed Roads up to the end of the last yearCompleted during the YearTotal Completed RoadsRoads in Progress
_ ITotal for Asian Development Bank
Grand Total 75485814046
PMGSY/SCH/F-538PMGSY PROGRAMME FUNDSCIHEDULES FORMING PART OF BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31st March 2016
Schedule ofUp-gradation of Existing RoadsName of SRRDA: Rajasthan Rural Road Devlopment Agency Ra asthan JaipurSCHEDULE No A2.- Amount Inner Column 2 Outer ColumnUPGRADATION OF EXISTING ROADS Inner Column I (sub-total of (Sub-rotal of innerSerial No. Names of Roads
Inner Col. 1) Col. 2)1 2 3 4 5Part I Roads funded by the Ministry of Rural Development,Government of India.
Completed Roads up to the end of the last year 25,054,108,107.00Completed during the Year 623,991,757.00Total Completed Roads
25,678,099,864.00Roads in Progress _.__-_-__.Q20 670,84300Total for MoRD
26,698,770,707.00
PuR
rd Ac
Serial No. T Names of Roads Amount Inner Column 2 Outer ColumnInner Column I (sub-total of (Sub-total of innerEInner Col. 21
Partl fRoads funded by the World BankCompleted Roads up to the end of the last year 3,739,292,302.00Completed during the Year 76,691,093.00Total Completed Roads
3,815,983,395.00Roads in Progress 186,681,308.00Total for World Bank
Serial No. Names of Roads Amount Inner Column2 Outer ColumnInner Column I (sub-total of (Sub-total of innerIner Col, 1 Cot 21
Part Ill Roads funded by the Asian Development BankCompleted Roads up to the end of the last year -Completed during the YearTotal Completed RoadsRoads in Progress
Total for Asian Development BankGrand Total
30,701,435,410.00
PMGSY/SCll/F-53CPMGSY PROGRAMME FUNDSCHEDULES FORMING PART OF BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31st March 2016
Schedule of Other Expenditure on RoadsName of SRRDA: Rajasthan Rural Road Devlopment Agency Ra asthan JaipurSCHEDULE No. A3 Other Expenditure connected with Road Till the last During the TotaIWorks
Balance Sheet YearA.Expenditure on Plantation -B.Expenditure on Si&n Boards
80,173.00 80,173.00
PMGSY/SCII/F-54PX1GSY PROGRAMME FUNDSCHEDULES FORMING PART OF BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31st March 2016SCHEDULE OF FUNDS RECONCILITATON BETWEEN SRRDA AND PlUsName of SRRDA: Rajasthan Rural Road Dcvlopment Agency Rajasthan JaipurSchedule LS of Reconciliation between PIIs and SRRDA
Line No. Particulars Amount AmountPart L Programme Fund
Funds SRRDA transferred to Pl1UsFunds received by PlUs as per their accounts
-Difference: A. The amount not accounted by PIU -Part I. Bank Authorisation AccountOutstanding Balance as per SRRDA books -_ Outstanding Balance as per PlUs booksDifference: A. The amount not accounted by SRRDA -
,AIPUR
Position Of Monthly Alc As on 31.03.2016 DESIT SIDE )
Upgradadlon of exslting Road* Upgradation of existing
Construction of New Roads Construction of New Road§ (World Bank Constmrction of New Ronds (World Bank RRP4l) Road*
Word Bank RRP 4 RRP-il Construction of New Roads Regular) Reldual W.rk of RRP4 (Worfd !nkRRP-Ml)
$.No, Name of PIU
n.P.roes Completed lo Progrec Completed n Progress Conpleted n Progress coleted n Progress Compled in P m.rosa Complktdll 11.011 mer 0 0 171452598 87369957 1755192 679902958 0 0 0 0 0 0
Upgradation of exjafing RöadsUpgradalionof exisi nRoads (Reuioar) Residunt Work of RRP-t Mobilisation Advnce achinr anceTOTAL
S.No. Name of PIU
Rond side Advan-ofor World Bank World Bank World Bank World BankIn Pogress Comp~letLd ln Progress Comploted Sign Board. DPR Regufar iRRP-4 (RIRP.iL Reular (RRP41 (RRP-il)
fa 18 Bhagwan Stone Crushei E-paymeit 29.03.16 314509 04.04.164 1 Rsamanc 21 Mukesh G Goyal E-äyment 29.03 16 531979 11.04.1
L ; manf 2£ Raghunath lat E-ayment 29.03 16 1904314 04 ;4
4 _____ p J e1. 12 Sawdriya conStruCtiOn payment 30.03.16 6288642 r14 1
41 .daipur 1S Sawariya construction pE-ayment 30.03.16 T 8517128 04.O145r 16 Mndan Construction &ayment 17.1t2 220
Total 53970866
GA<
ä ~~9d Acc0
äfc iscp i4 T, l 4 u14xSTATE BANK OF BK NEFt AND JAIPUR( <wråfi t zz -<mi"/As$ociae Of The åtate Bank Of inca)
The Secretarv (PIGSY)Rajasthan Rural Road Development Agency
Ja i pur
í DateD)ear Sir,
fintrest 1>idCredited to RRRDA Programme Fund Account1 0005 1803 01/04/201 5 to 3 1/03/2016)
\Ve \vould like to advise that interegt paidlcredited to R R R 1 DA ProgrnmeFund Account during 01/04/2015 to 31/03/2016 is Rs. 313719K35 (RupeesThirtv One Crorc Thirty Seven Lacs Niriteen Thousand Hight lundred ThirtNF ve only) as dcetail below:-
h \n. 159902192
0un 4 690l 5j l 51 61-49 01 .u1 484892
.sep ý4241746 lO 8141S
1Dee 13800404jan 55935600
l b 1-163437291 '-M0ar 15013420Toral 313719835
It is certi if that intenrest is being paid as per the Triparite agreernentbet een SBBJ/R RRDA/NRRDA
Thanking you,
For State Bank of-Bikan tanrcd Jaipur
G G
Af v ,
Inretc 3m5'innan qý*nw tztm z
STATE BANMk OF 51KANE R AND JAIPUR
The Sccr<etary Apr-16
(PMvGSY)
Rajasihan Rural RoAd Devcloptcnt Agcncy
P\VIO C>mplex
Sir.
10000951803 Mar.16
OPENING 13A ANE _C0 of-,01/03/2016
BAILANCE IN MODN/FD 1493808816 00
Galace i cd29921945&00
iALAN OF RRRDA IN M MAIN A/C o103-2016 1793028274.00
Receipt fram (ol 4326300000.00
nt hduringkhe it1iMar.6 15013420.00
chrque & neh fieceIpt 82750.00
RIvERSAL tECTION _2098043.00
I ut;ýl ____6136522487.00
TOATAI. PAYMENf 2703817419 62
CLOSING BA\LANC AS ON 31-03-2016 3432705067.38
LANCE IN r2271462 133.38Balance inj r.c ___________ 116124293 00
3432705067. 8
- y~uurs fithb1
cG
*
Pradhaii M2:ri Gram Sadak Yojana
PMGSY PROGRAMME FUND
PMGS 1CASH BOOK OF SRRDA(Referred to in paragraph 1 53 of the Manual)
Month-Year : March - 2016
Nodal Agency: Rajasthan, Rajasthan Rural Road Development Agency
Note: All Amounts are in LReceipt Side
Payment Side
Date Money Particulars of Transaction Cash (Rs, Cheque Bank Account
Receipt /
Number Code Date Money Particulars of Transaction Cash I ts. ) Cheque
Bank Accoi
01*03-2016 Opening Balance
T 0.00 - W 1,780,035,462.00 -Receipt /
Number Cod
15.03-2016 R01 Central grant received by SRRDA for 0.000 81,127,000,000,00 1.33 31-03-2016 VO1 Cheue Encashed by DPiU Of Z0.00-
2,213,729.00 1.04
State Plan Schemes through State
Ajmer
Treasury for PMGSY-1 Roads of'Rs. 112700000 ,de sanctionnoJ.12032/1/20TS.RC
dt.19.02.2016
2703.2016 R02 1REcilpt o funds forState Share (1,07 T 0.00 0 8 2,400,000,000.00 1.07 31-03-2016 V02 Cheue Encashed by DPIU Of * 0.00
; 4,803,429.00 1.04
(A)) of PMr5SY Programme Cund vide
Atwar
sanction No 807/2015.1628-03-2016 R03 Receipt of funds for State Share (1.07
0.00 0 w799,300,000.00 1.07 31-03-2016 V03 Cheue Encashed by DPIU Of
0.00 -Z19,090,703.00 1.04
(A)) of PMGSY Programme Fund vide
Banswara
sanction No 807/2015.161-03-2016 R04 Receipt of Intrest from bank account of F0.00 0
Z 14,784,787.00 21,01 31-03-2016 V04 Cheue Encashed byDPIUaf T0.00.
5,105.027.00 104
Rs.14784787 for the month March 2016
Baran
1-03-2016 R05 Receipt of Intrest from bank account of T 0.00 0 228,633.00 21.01 31-03-2016 V05 Cheue Encashed by DPIU Of
0 257,651,328.00
Rs.228633.00 diference ampount of
Barmer
interest reported by bank as petrevised bank certificate. Total:
T0.00 Total: 8 6,121.348,882.00 31.03-2016 VO6 Cheue Encashed by DPlU Of 50.00
'87.941,525.001,048haratpur
31-03-2016 V07 Cheue Encashed by DPiU Ot z; 0.00 -
83,761,672.00 1.04
Bhilwara31-03-2016 V08 Cheue EncashedDyPO
000 Z207J61,914.00 1.04
Bikaner31 01 2016 V09 Cheue Encashed by DPU 01
0. F4,910.161.00 1.04
BundiPage 1 of I
Gene(ated On 09/0812016 02:44 PM
RA,lligtRervd
26C
0.0 All Rig 05,027s 00 .04
Pradhan Mo,ntri Gram Sadak Yojana31.03,2016 V10 Cheue Encashed by DPIU Of
0,00 -5 6,037,180.00 1.
Chittorgarh31-03-2016 V11 Cheue Encashed by OPIU Of 000 -
7,804,945.00 41,
Churu31-03-2016 v12 Cheue Encashed by OPIU Of
0.00 -8,575.392.00 1.C
Dausa31-03.2016 V13 Cheue Encashed by DPIU of 0.00 -
6702,063,00 1.0.
Deedwana31-03-2016 V14 Cheue Encashed by DPIU Of
0.00 -16,016,664,00 1,04
Dholpur31-03-2016 VIS Cheue Encashed by OPIU Of
0.00 -6 625,653,710.00 1,04
Dungarpur31-03-2016 V17 Cheue Encashed by OPIU Of
60.00 -6230,655,629.00 104
Jaipur31-03-2016 V19 Cheue Encashed by OPIUOf
0.00 -6265,970,888.00 1.04
Jalore31-03-2016 V21 Cheue Encashed by DPIU Of
:0,00 - ¥ 10,538,081.00 1.04
Jhunjhunu31.03-2016 V22 Cheue Encashed by DPU 0
;0.00 -6252,880,295.00 1,04
Jodhpur31-03-2016 V23 Cheue Encashed by OPIU Of
60.00 -- 25,234,878.00 1.04
Karauti31-03-2016 V24 .Cheue Encashed by OPIU Of Kota 0 Ó7,068,155.00
1.0431-03-2016 V25 Cheue Encashed by DPIU 0(
0.00 -. 46,522,520.00 1.04
Nagaur31-03-2016 V26 Cheue Encashed by DPIU Of Pati 60.00 -
6 2,591,251.00 1.0431-03-2016 V27 Cheue Encashed by OPIU Of
0.00 -11,11,073.00 1.04
Pratapgarh31-03-2016 V28 Cheue Encashed by DPIU Of
0.00 -38,735,732.00 1.04
Rajsamand31-03-2016 V29 Cheue Encashed by DPIU Of
0.00 -630,763,407.00 1,04
Sawaimadhopur31-03- 2016 V30 Cheue Encashed by DPIU Of Sikar 60.00 -
61,850,000.00 1.0431-03-2016 V31 Cheue Encashed by PIU Of
z0 00 -61,991,794.00 104
Sirohi31-03-2016 V33 Cheue Encashed by DPIU Of Tonk z0.00 -
r 1,001,324,00 1.0431-03.2016 V34 Cheue Encashed by DPIU Of
0,00 -378,000,041.00 1 04
JAIPUR
Udaipu
Tota : 0.00Total : 2.74?2.947,510.00
Ac 31-03-2016
-Closing Balance
0.00 - 3,378.40372.ooPae I o 1
Generated On :09/08/2016 02:44 PM
NRRDA, All Rights Reserved.
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER (PMGSY), RAJASTHAN JAIPUR
Certificate
It is certified that Maintenance Funds required as per
maintenance contracts in force had been received for the previous
financial year to MoRD / NRRDA on time.
SRRDfA)
JaipurSAc
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER (PMGSY), RAJASTHAN JAIPUR
CERTIFICATE
It is certified that updation of data in OMMAS has been completed upto
31.03.2016 under PMGSY State of Rajasthan.
6ngineer (PMGSY)
\ JAIPUR
d Ac
Office of Rajasthan Rural Road Development Agenecy
Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana
P.W.D. Complex, Near Ajmer Pulia
Jaipur
L.T. No.
Date: - 16.09.2016
To
MIS Vinod Singhal & Company,
Charted Accountants,
207.222. Ganpati Plaza,
M.l. Road
Jaipur- 302001
Sub:- Certificate for the Programme Fund of Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana for theyear ending 31st March, 2016
Sir,
As per your representation we are certifying that:-
1. "Cash In Hand" Balance as on 31st March, 2016 of Programme Funds is "Nil"
2. "Stores & Stock" Balance as on 31st March. 2016 of Programme Funds is "Nil"
3. "Expenditure of Plantation" upto 31st March 2016 is "Nil".
Thanking You.
edAcco0Financial Advisor
(RRRDA) (RRRDA)
0 Ahinexure -I (UC)
UTILIZATION CERTIFICATE FOR THE YEAR;2015-2016 (AS ON 31-03-2016)UNDER PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA
PROGRAMME FUND
Agency: Rajasthan Rural Road Development Agency State: Rajasthan
A. Unspent balance as on 01-04-2015 Rs. 217.28 Cr 1. Certified that a sum of Rs. 554.29 Cr was received as(begining of the financial year 2015-2016) from Gevernement of India. grants-in-aid from Goverment of India during the year 2015-
2016 & a sum of Rs. 317.06 Cr was received as grants-in-aidB. Grants received during the year 2015-2016 from Government of India. from Goverment'of Rajasthan during the year 2015-2016 as
per details given in the margin, a sum of Rs. 217.28 Cr beingthe unspent balance of previous year 2014-2015 has beenbrought forward for utilization during the year 2015-2016,Interest receipt of the Agency during the year 2015-2016 isSr.No. Description Amount (Rsin Rs. 31.37 Cr, Other miscellaneous receipt of-the AgencyCrore)during the year so far is Rs. 2.93 Cr.1 Central grant received by SRRDA for State 20.00
Plan Schemes through State Treasury forPMGSY-1 RoadsRs.200000000 Letter No.0 2. It is certified that out of a total available fund of Rs. 1122.93dated 27/04/2015 Voucher no - R01 Cr a sum of Rs. 785.09 Cr only has been utilized by the Rajasthan
Rajasthan Rural Road Development Agency during the year 2015-2016 for the purpose for which it was sanctioned.
2 Central grant received by SRRDA for State 155.00 Out of the amount utilized, as expenditure amounting to Rs.Plan Schemes through State Treasury for 776.77 Cr has been incurred.PMGSY-1 RoadsRs.1550000000 Letter No.0 Unspent balance as on 31-03-2016 Rs. 337.84 Cr (End of thedated 07/05/2015 Voucher no - R02 financial year 2015-2016)
3 Central grant received by SRRDA for State 107.57Plan Schemes through State Treasury forPMGSY-I Roads vide sanction no j-12032/1/2015.RC Letter No.466226 dated13/08/2015 Voucher no - R01
4 Amount of Interest earn in Bank account 16.79during the year 2014-2015 is transferred toProgramme Fund as per CE PMGSY Order No.322 dated 14.09.2015 Letter No. dated14/09/2015 Voucher no - 07A
5 Central grant received by SRRDA for State 122.80Plan Schemes through State Treasury forPMGSY-I RoadsRs. 1228000000 vide GOISanction No.p.17024/22/2009RC(FMSNo.307970) dt.8.12.2015 Letter No.0 dated05/01/2016 Voucher no - R02
6 Amount Received from State Govt. for 19.43payment to Forest Department is nowtransferred as per direction of NRRDA andMoRD letter dated 20.01.2016 Letter No.dated 30/01/2016 Voucher no - 51
o G
au
7 Central grant received by SRRDA for State 112.70
Plan Schemes through State Treasury forPMGSY- I Roads of Rs. 1127000000 videsanction noJ.12032/i/2015.RCdt.19.02.2016 Letter No.0 dated 15/03/2016
Voucher no - R01
8 Receipt of funds by nodal agency from state 16.56govt of Rs. 165565000 Against RSRDC WorksLetter No.0 dated 28/01/2016 Voucher no -R03
9 Amount Received from State Govt. for -19.43payment to Forest Department is now
transferred as per direction of NRRDA andMoRD letter dated 20.01.2016 Letter No.
dated 30/01/2016 Voucher no - 51
10 Receipt of funds for State Share (1.07 (A)) 240.00
of PMGSY Programme Fund vide sanction No807/2015.16 Letter No.0 dated 28/03/2016Voucher no - R02
11 Receipt of funds for State Share (1.07 (A)) 79.93
of PMGSY Programme Fund vide sanction No807/2015.16 Letter No.0 dated 28/03/2016Voucher no - R03
Total 871135
12 interest received during the year 31.37
13 Other Miscellaneous Receipts, under PMGSY 2.93
Grand Total 1122.93
Certified that I have satisfied myself that the conditions on which funds were sanctioned have been duty fulfilled / are being
fulfilled and that I have exercised the following checks to see that the money has been actutLy utilized for the purpose for
which it was sanctioned.
Kinds of checks exercised:
(i) It has been ensured that physical and financial performance under PMGSY has been according to the requirements as
prescribed by the Goverment of India.
(ii) It has been checked and ensured that assistance released by the Goverment of India for implementation of the programme
(including administrative expenses) has not been diverted and utilized for any item expenditure which is not admissible as per
programme guidelines.
Signat 126C.
Name: Alok Mathur jA!PUR *
Designation: Financial Controller, FA (NH) PWD Rajasthan jaipur,
Rajasthan
Date:Official Stamp:
Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana
PMGSY/F-2PMGSY PROGRAMME FUND
STATE BALANCE SHEET(Referred.to In paragraph 15.4.2 of the Manual)Name of SRRDA Rajasthan- Rajasthan Rural Road Development Agency
Year : 2015-2016Note: All Amounts are in Rs.Liabillties / Particular
S edule Current Amunt Prevfous AmountLiabilities Programme Fund received from PMGSY/SCH/F-52AA
r 76,699,333,105.00 -76 337,138,782.00Programme fund received by SRRDA PMGSY/SCH/F-52AA z 17,886,500,000.00 r 17,886,500,000.00Funds Received from State PMGSY/SCH/F-52ÅA
5,U 165,565,000.00 : 194,308,656.00Fund received from State Share of
- 3,199,300,000.00 z 0.00
Programme Funds received from 0.00 0.00
Programme Funds received from u0.oo u0.00
Programme Funds received from State ; 0.0 : 0.00
Programme Funds received from State :0.00 0.00
Funds received from MORD for f0.00 :u0.00
Funds received from MORD for 50.00 0.00
Central grant for State Plan Schemes 0o.000 0.00
Central grant for State Plan Schemes u0.00 10.00
Central grant for State Plan Schemes : 9,237,300,000.00 V 4,056,600,000.00Central grant for State Plan Schemes
u0.00 u0.00Central grant for State Plan Schemes f0.00 0.000Agency Fees to PSU ;0.00 U0.00
Incidental Funds(from interests and .- 498,970,820.00 V323,855,066.00Misc. Income
0.00 ;273,349.00Un-Reconciled Bank Authorizations 0.00 v0.00Liabilities Total
: 109,593,292,707.00 : 100,619,955,729.00Assets Expenditure on New Roads PMGSY/SCH/F-53AAMoRD
42,048,483,288.00 41,625,083,776.00World Bank(RRP1) : 6,655,162,929.00 : 6,655,162,929.00World Bank(RRP2) 18,772,215,400.36 V 10,622,771,889.24Residual Work of RRP1
: 5,474,766.00 X 5.474,766.00Asian Development Bank "0.00 0.00Others ; 0.00 ¥0.00Expenditure on New Roads (in PMGSY/SCH/F-53AA
MoRD : 599,422,214.00 1,005,380,058.00world Bank(RRP1) Z 12,608,063.00 ; 12,608,063.00World Bank(RRP2)
5 7,392,447,385.64 ; 7,819,866,237.76Residual Work of RRP1 ;0.00 0.00Asian Development Bank ; 0.00 z 0.00Others
0,00 0.00Expenditure on Up-gradation of PMGSY/SCH/F-5388MoRD
C 25,678,099,864.00 f 25,054,108,107.00World Bank(RRP1) 13,777,130,871.00 U3,702,567,663.00World Bank(RRP2)
f 0.00. -0.00Residual Work of RRPI 38,852,524.00 36,724,639.00Asian Development Bank
0.00 r 0.00Others f0.00 0.00Expenditure on Up.gradation of PSYSHF-53BI3
MoRD F 1,020,670,843.00 1, 498,725,422.00World Bank(RRP1)
168,999,432.00 '243,562,640.00World Bank(RRP2) 40.00 r0.00Residuat Work of RRP1
G 17,681,876.00 z 17,681,876.00Asian Development Bank \ 0.00 v0.00Others
o • 0 0.00
jAjPuRI~
Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak YojanaExpenditure on Ptantation PMGSY/SCH/F-53CC
V 0.00 0.oCAgency Fees to NEA HeadQuarters
'f0.00 0.00Expenditure on Sign Boards PMGSY/SCHIF-53CC
- 80,173.00 80,173.00Technicat Monitors
z0.00 0.00Expenditure on Upgradation of PMGSY--
0.00 Z0.00Expenditure on Upgradation of PMGSY-
0.00 0.00Constructfon of Rural Road Network
0.00 0.00Construction of Rural Road Training 0.00 0.00
Special Works-Reparation of 0. 0 0.00
Laboratory and Equipment 7.0 0.00
Acquisition of Land
0. 66 Ó00Detailed Project Report
\0.00 0.00Investments, Deposits and Other
u0.00 0.00Current Assets
PMGSY/SCH/F-53D v 27,561,706.00 ; 147,390,149.00.
Stores and Stock .0.00 : 0.00
Cash in Chest :-0 0.00
Bank Balance with ac.redited Bank 3,378,401,372.00 2,172,76 7,341.00
Un-reconcited Programme fund 0,00 W 0.00Assets Total