Top Banner
The Microevolution Processes in Human Populations: The Emerging Portrait of Global Gene Pool Structure The 10 th International Conference on Bioinformatics: "Genomics and Evolution of Pathogens and Hosts“ November 19-21, 2015, Atlanta, USA. Oleg Balanovsky
50

of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Mar 22, 2023

Download

Documents

Khang Minh
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

The Microevolution Processes in Human Populations:

The Emerging Portrait

of Global Gene Pool Structure  

The 10th International Conference on Bioinformatics: "Genomics and Evolution of Pathogens and Hosts“

November 19-21, 2015, Atlanta, USA.

Oleg Balanovsky

Page 2: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Centenary  of  Gene  Geography  1914  (1919)  -­‐  2015  

1914: THE DISCOVERY OF THE UNEQUAL DISTRIBUTION OF HUMAN BLOOD GROUPS ACROSS THE GLOBE 1919: THE FIRST PUBLICATION

Hirsfeld L., Hirsfeld H. Serological differences between the blood of different races. The results of researches on the Macedonian front// Lancet. 1919. P. 675. Hirszfeld, L., and H. Hirszfeld. 1919. Essai d’application des methodes au probleme des races. Anthropologie 29: 505-537.

The tragedy of the World War I revealed the dramatic differences in frequencies of blood groups between soldiers of different races and ethnic groups.

Page 3: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Gene8c  markers  in  fashion:  dynamics  Number  of  papers  per  year  is  ploDed  for  5  principal  systems  of  gene8c  markers  

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

1919

19

23

1927

19

31

1935

19

39

1943

19

47

1951

19

55

1959

19

63

1967

19

71

1975

19

79

1983

19

87

1991

19

95

1999

20

03

2007

20

11

Classical immunological

Classical biochemical Y-chromosome

mtDNA

genomewide

Page 4: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

•  To study a gene pool reliably one needs to analyze different genetics systems in parallel; •  The most reliable patterns are those which are revealed by each system. •  Once this general genetic structure is drawn, each system might add its own details on this genetic portrait of the populations.

The  “polysystem  approach”  

Classical mtDNA Y-

chromosome

Page 5: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Our  expedi8ons  The biobank contains 24, 000 samples

from 256 indigenous populations studied in 1998 - 2015

Page 6: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

DATA  SETS  USED  

Classical markers •  Cavalli-Sforza et al., 1994. •  «Gene Pool» databank (Balanovska, Rychkov, 1990-2000)

mtDNA MURKA database: (Balanovsky, Zaporozhchenko, Balanovska, 2003-2014)

Y-Chromosome Y-base. (Balanovsky, Pshenichnov, Sychev, Balanovska, 2008-2014)

Genome wide Li et al., 2008

Page 7: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

The  atlases  of  gene  pool  

Maps  of  principal  compondents  Diversity  maps  

Gene8c  distances  maps  Summarized  maps  

Gene8c  boundaries  maps  

Synthe8c  maps  (dozens)  

A  separate  map  for  each  allele  

Maps  of  separate  haplogroups  (hundreds)  

Were created by our GeneGeo cartographic software

Page 8: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Summary  #  1:        

World  gene  pool    in  the  mirror  of  classical  markers  

Page 9: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Maps  of  the  principal  components  Classical markers

Page 10: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Map  of  intra-­‐popula8on  diversity  (heterozygosity)    

Classical markers

High  heterozygosity  

Page 11: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Classical markers

Map  of  intra-­‐popula8on  diversity  (heterozygosity)    

High  heterozygosity  

Page 12: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Summary  #  2:          

World  gene  pool    in  the  mirror  of  Y-­‐chromosome  

Page 13: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Diversity  maps  

Intrapopulation diversity

Interpopulation diversity

Revealing the geographic areas with high interpopulation diversity

High diversity is expected at the boundaries of the contrasting gene pools

Map of interpopulation diversity Map of genetic boundaries

Page 14: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Areas  of  gene+c  boundaries  

Map  showing  levels  of  interpopula8on  diversity  

Interpopulation diversity was calculate in the sliding window 1000x1000 km

Y-chromosome

Green  color  shows  areas  with  high  interpopula8on  diversity  

Page 15: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Summary  #  3:        

World  gene  pool    in  the  mirror  of  genome-­‐wide  data  

Page 16: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Most geographic regions have their own genetic component; Europe ad Near East are the most

intermixed with each other.

Genome  wide  

Page 17: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Genome  wide  

Clear geographic structuring was

observed.

Page 18: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Summary  #  4:        

World  gene  pool    in  the  mirror  of  mtDNA  

Page 19: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Projection of the variables on the factor-plane ( 1 x 2)

Active

A10 A11 A2 A4 A5

A8 B4_16261 B4a1a1a B4a1b B4b1

B4B2 B4c1b B4c2

B4f B4g B5a B5b

B6

J L0a

L0d L0f L0k

L1b L1c

L2a L2b L2d

L2e L3b

L3c

L3d L3e L3f L3h L3i1 L3i2

L3x L4 L5 L6 M1

M10 M12a''b M13

M14 M15

M20 M21 M42a

M45 M50 M51 M52 M62 M71 M73 M74

M7a M7b M7c M8a

M8C1 M8C4a1a M8C4a2 M8C4a4a M8C4b1a M8C4b2 M8C4b3 M8C5 M8Z M9a''b M9E MD4b1 MD4D1 MD4e1D2 MD4h3 MD4o MD5 MQ

N13

N9a

N9b N9Y

O1

P1 P2

P3

P4 P9

R0a R11

R2 R22 R30b R5 R6 R7

R9b

R9c R9F1a1

R9F1a4 R9F1b R9F2a R9F3a R9F3b R9F4a

S1

S2 S3 S5

T1 T2 U2a U2b U2c U2e

-1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0

Factor 1 : 6,25%

-1,0

-0,5

0,0

0,5

1,0

Fact

or 2

: 6

,08%

Dataset: Frequencies of 118 haplogroups in 619 populations worldwide.

Plots shows haplogroups rather than populations.  Projection of the variables on the factor-plane ( 1 x 3)

Active

A10 A11

A2 A4

A5

A8

B4_16261

B4a1a1a B4a1b

B4b1

B4B2

B4c1b B4c2

B4f

B4g

B5a

B5b B6

J

L0a

L0d

L0f

L0k

L1b

L1c

L2a

L2b

L2d

L2e L3b

L3c

L3d L3e L3f

L3h

L3i1

L3i2 L3x L4 L5

L6 M1 M10

M12a''b

M13 M14 M15 M20

M21

M42a

M45

M50 M51

M52

M62

M71 M73

M74

M7a

M7b

M7c

M8a

M8C1 M8C4a1a M8C4a2 M8C4a4a M8C4b1a M8C4b2 M8C4b3

M8C5 M8Z M9a''b

M9E

MD4b1 MD4D1 MD4e1D2 MD4h3 MD4o MD5

MQ N13

N9a

N9b N9Y O1

P1 P2 P3

P4 P9 R0a

R11

R2

R22

R30b

R5 R6 R7

R9b

R9c

R9F1a1

R9F1a4

R9F1b

R9F2a R9F3a

R9F3b R9F4a

S1 S2 S3 S5

T1 T2

U2a U2b U2c

U2e

-1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0

Factor 1 : 6,25%

-1,0

-0,5

0,0

0,5

1,0Fa

ctor

3 :

4,7

8%

Projection of the variables on the factor-plane ( 1 x 4)

Active

A10

A11

A2 A4

A5

A8

B4_16261 B4a1a1a

B4a1b

B4b1

B4B2

B4c1b

B4c2

B4f

B4g B5a

B5b

B6 J

L0a L0d L0f L0k L1b

L1c L2a L2b L2d L2e L3b

L3c L3d L3e L3f L3h L3i1 L3i2 L3x L4 L5

L6 M1

M10

M12a''b

M13

M14 M15

M20 M21

M42a

M45 M50 M51

M52

M62

M71 M73 M74

M7a

M7b

M7c

M8a

M8C1

M8C4a1a M8C4a2

M8C4a4a

M8C4b1a

M8C4b2

M8C4b3 M8C5

M8Z

M9a''b

M9E

MD4b1

MD4D1 MD4e1D2 MD4h3

MD4o

MD5

MQ

N13 N9a

N9b

N9Y

O1

P1 P2 P3 P4 P9

R0a

R11

R2

R22 R30b

R5 R6

R7 R9b

R9c

R9F1a1 R9F1a4

R9F1b

R9F2a

R9F3a R9F3b

R9F4a

S1 S2 S3 S5 T1

T2

U2a U2b U2c

U2e

-1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0

Factor 1 : 6,25%

-1,0

-0,5

0,0

0,5

1,0

Fact

or 4

: 3

,52%

Factors 1 and 2 Factors 1 and 3 Factors 1 and 4

1 2 3

Three  clusters  are  obvious   The  same  two  

clusters  plus  one  new  one  

Two  new  clusters  

1 2 4

1 2

5

6

PC  analysis   mtDNA

Page 20: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Summarized  frequencies  of  haplogroups    of  the  cluster  1  

Cluster  1  includes  East  Asian  haplogroups  

Projection of the variables on the factor-plane ( 1 x 2)

Active

A10 A11 A2 A4 A5

A8 B4_16261 B4a1a1a B4a1b B4b1

B4B2 B4c1b B4c2

B4f B4g B5a B5b

B6

J L0a

L0d L0f L0k

L1b L1c

L2a L2b L2d

L2e L3b

L3c

L3d L3e L3f L3h L3i1 L3i2

L3x L4 L5 L6 M1

M10 M12a''b M13

M14 M15

M20 M21 M42a

M45 M50 M51 M52 M62 M71 M73 M74

M7a M7b M7c M8a

M8C1 M8C4a1a M8C4a2 M8C4a4a M8C4b1a M8C4b2 M8C4b3 M8C5 M8Z M9a''b M9E MD4b1 MD4D1 MD4e1D2 MD4h3 MD4o MD5 MQ

N13

N9a

N9b N9Y

O1

P1 P2

P3

P4 P9

R0a R11

R2 R22 R30b R5 R6 R7

R9b

R9c R9F1a1

R9F1a4 R9F1b R9F2a R9F3a R9F3b R9F4a

S1

S2 S3 S5

T1 T2 U2a U2b U2c U2e

-1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0

Factor 1 : 6,25%

-1,0

-0,5

0,0

0,5

1,0

Fact

or 2

: 6

,08%

Factors 1 and 2

1 2 3

This  map  is  a  sum  of  maps  of  all  haplogroups  belonging  to  

cluster  1  

mtDNA

Red  colors  indicate  high  frequencies  

Page 21: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

No  doubts,  the  African  cluster  Projection of the variables on the factor-plane ( 1 x 2)

Active

A10 A11 A2 A4 A5

A8 B4_16261 B4a1a1a B4a1b B4b1

B4B2 B4c1b B4c2

B4f B4g B5a B5b

B6

J L0a

L0d L0f L0k

L1b L1c

L2a L2b L2d

L2e L3b

L3c

L3d L3e L3f L3h L3i1 L3i2

L3x L4 L5 L6 M1

M10 M12a''b M13

M14 M15

M20 M21 M42a

M45 M50 M51 M52 M62 M71 M73 M74

M7a M7b M7c M8a

M8C1 M8C4a1a M8C4a2 M8C4a4a M8C4b1a M8C4b2 M8C4b3 M8C5 M8Z M9a''b M9E MD4b1 MD4D1 MD4e1D2 MD4h3 MD4o MD5 MQ

N13

N9a

N9b N9Y

O1

P1 P2

P3

P4 P9

R0a R11

R2 R22 R30b R5 R6 R7

R9b

R9c R9F1a1

R9F1a4 R9F1b R9F2a R9F3a R9F3b R9F4a

S1

S2 S3 S5

T1 T2 U2a U2b U2c U2e

-1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0

Factor 1 : 6,25%

-1,0

-0,5

0,0

0,5

1,0

Fact

or 2

: 6

,08%

Факторы 1 и 2

1 2 3

Summarized  frequencies  of  haplogroups    of  the  cluster  2   mtDNA

Red  colors  indicate  high  frequencies  

This  map  is  a  sum  of  maps  of  all  haplogroups  belonging  to  

cluster  2  

Page 22: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Australian  one  Projection of the variables on the factor-plane ( 1 x 2)

Active

A10 A11 A2 A4 A5

A8 B4_16261 B4a1a1a B4a1b B4b1

B4B2 B4c1b B4c2

B4f B4g B5a B5b

B6

J L0a

L0d L0f L0k

L1b L1c

L2a L2b L2d

L2e L3b

L3c

L3d L3e L3f L3h L3i1 L3i2

L3x L4 L5 L6 M1

M10 M12a''b M13

M14 M15

M20 M21 M42a

M45 M50 M51 M52 M62 M71 M73 M74

M7a M7b M7c M8a

M8C1 M8C4a1a M8C4a2 M8C4a4a M8C4b1a M8C4b2 M8C4b3 M8C5 M8Z M9a''b M9E MD4b1 MD4D1 MD4e1D2 MD4h3 MD4o MD5 MQ

N13

N9a

N9b N9Y

O1

P1 P2

P3

P4 P9

R0a R11

R2 R22 R30b R5 R6 R7

R9b

R9c R9F1a1

R9F1a4 R9F1b R9F2a R9F3a R9F3b R9F4a

S1

S2 S3 S5

T1 T2 U2a U2b U2c U2e

-1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0

Factor 1 : 6,25%

-1,0

-0,5

0,0

0,5

1,0

Fact

or 2

: 6

,08%

Факторы 1 и 2

1 2 3

Summarized  frequencies  of  haplogroups    of  the  cluster  3   mtDNA

Red  colors  indicate  high  frequencies  

This  map  is  a  sum  of  maps  of  all  haplogroups  belonging  to  

cluster  3  

Page 23: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

European  /  Near  Eastern  cluster  

Projection of the variables on the factor-plane ( 1 x 3)

Active

A10 A11

A2 A4

A5

A8

B4_16261

B4a1a1a B4a1b

B4b1

B4B2

B4c1b B4c2

B4f

B4g

B5a

B5b B6

J

L0a

L0d

L0f

L0k

L1b

L1c

L2a

L2b

L2d

L2e L3b

L3c

L3d L3e L3f

L3h

L3i1

L3i2 L3x L4 L5

L6 M1 M10

M12a''b

M13 M14 M15 M20

M21

M42a

M45

M50 M51

M52

M62

M71 M73

M74

M7a

M7b

M7c

M8a

M8C1 M8C4a1a M8C4a2 M8C4a4a M8C4b1a M8C4b2 M8C4b3

M8C5 M8Z M9a''b

M9E

MD4b1 MD4D1 MD4e1D2 MD4h3 MD4o MD5

MQ N13

N9a

N9b N9Y O1

P1 P2 P3

P4 P9 R0a

R11

R2

R22

R30b

R5 R6 R7

R9b

R9c

R9F1a1

R9F1a4

R9F1b

R9F2a R9F3a

R9F3b R9F4a

S1 S2 S3 S5

T1 T2

U2a U2b U2c

U2e

-1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0

Factor 1 : 6,25%

-1,0

-0,5

0,0

0,5

1,0

Fact

or 3

: 4

,78%

Факторы 1 и 3

1 2 4

Summarized  frequencies  of  haplogroups    of  the  cluster  4   mtDNA

Red  colors  indicate  high  frequencies  

This  map  is  a  sum  of  maps  of  all  haplogroups  belonging  to  

cluster  4  

Page 24: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Siberian  cluster  Projection of the variables on the factor-plane ( 1 x 4)

Active

A10

A11

A2 A4

A5

A8

B4_16261 B4a1a1a

B4a1b

B4b1

B4B2

B4c1b

B4c2

B4f

B4g B5a

B5b

B6 J

L0a L0d L0f L0k L1b

L1c L2a L2b L2d L2e L3b

L3c L3d L3e L3f L3h L3i1 L3i2 L3x L4 L5

L6 M1

M10

M12a''b

M13

M14 M15

M20 M21

M42a

M45 M50 M51

M52

M62

M71 M73 M74

M7a

M7b

M7c

M8a

M8C1

M8C4a1a M8C4a2

M8C4a4a

M8C4b1a

M8C4b2

M8C4b3 M8C5

M8Z

M9a''b

M9E

MD4b1

MD4D1 MD4e1D2 MD4h3

MD4o

MD5

MQ

N13 N9a

N9b

N9Y

O1

P1 P2 P3 P4 P9

R0a

R11

R2

R22 R30b

R5 R6

R7 R9b

R9c

R9F1a1 R9F1a4

R9F1b

R9F2a

R9F3a R9F3b

R9F4a

S1 S2 S3 S5 T1

T2

U2a U2b U2c

U2e

-1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0

Factor 1 : 6,25%

-1,0

-0,5

0,0

0,5

1,0

Fact

or 4

: 3

,52%

Факторы 1 и 4

1 2

5

6

Summarized  frequencies  of  haplogroups    of  the  cluster  6   mtDNA

Red  colors  indicate  high  frequencies  

This  map  is  a  sum  of  maps  of  all  haplogroups  belonging  to  

cluster  6  

Page 25: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

0,880,890,90,910,920,930,940,950,960,970,98

Increasing the haplotype diversity coincides with the Neolithization

ИОГен РАН Guido Brandt Prof. Kurt W. Alt

Institute of Anthropology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Germany

Australian center for ancient DNA, Adelaide, Australia

Dr. Wolfgang Haak

collaboration:

Dr. Oleg Balanovsky

BRANDT  ET  AL.,  2013.  Science.  

Page 26: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Neolithisation Demic diffusion

ORIGIN ON THE EUROPEANS NEOLITHIC VS PALEOLITHIC AGE OF THE EUROPEAN GENE POOL

Paleolithic initial settlement

n  First synthetic map summarizing genetic variation in Europe

(Cavall-Sforza et al., 1994)

n  Ages of major mitochondrial haplogroups in Europe

(Richards et al., 2000)

<< Neolithisation by cultural diffusion

Page 27: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Analysis  of  the  ancient  (Neolithic  DNA)  Map of genetic distances from Neolithic Europeans

Loca8on   of   the   sampled  Neolithic  Europeans  

The  present-­‐day  gene8cally  similar   popula8ons   are   in  the  Near  East  The  present  day  Europeans  are  gene8cally  distant  from  the  Neolithic  Europeans  Thus,   the   migra8ons   of  Neolithic   farmers   from  Near   East   took   place  indeed,   but   these   gene  pool   of   farmers   then  dissolved   in   the   local   gene  pool  of  hunder-­‐gatherers.  

Page 28: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

West  Asia  

Mesolithic  Europeans  (hunters-­‐gatheres)  

West  Europe  

East  Europe  

Ancient  DNA  unravels  history  of  Europeans  (based  on  papers  from  David  Reich  lab,  2013  -­‐  2015,  Nature)  

Page 29: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

West  Asia  

Anatolian  Neolithic  (farmers)  

Mesolithic  Europeans  (hunters-­‐gatheres)  

West  Europe  

East  Europe  

Ancient  DNA  unravels  history  of  Europeans  (based  on  papers  from  David  Reich  lab,  2013  -­‐  2015,  Nature)  

Page 30: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

West  Asia  

Anatolian  Neolithic  (farmers)  

Early  Neolithic  Europeans  (farmers)    

Mesolithic  Europeans  (hunters-­‐gatheres)  

West  Europe  

East  Europe  

Page 31: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

West  Asia  

Anatolian  Neolithic  (farmers)  

Early  Neolithic  Europeans  (farmers)    

Late  Neolithic  Europeans  (farmers  admixed  with  hunters)    

Mesolithic  Europeans  (hunters-­‐gatheres)  

West  Europe  

East  Europe  

Page 32: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

West  Asia  

Anatolian  Neolithic  (farmers)  

Early  Neolithic  Europeans  (farmers)    

Late  Neolithic  Europeans  (farmers  admixed  with  hunters)    

Mesolithic  Europeans  (hunters-­‐gatheres)  

West  Europe  

East  Europe  

Page 33: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

West  Asia  

Anatolian  Neolithic  (farmers)  

Early  Neolithic  Europeans  (farmers)    

Late  Neolithic  Europeans  (farmers  admixed  with  hunters)    

Mesolithic  Europeans  (hunters-­‐gatheres)  

Bronze  Age  nomads  

West  Europe  

East  Europe  

Page 34: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

West  Asia  

Anatolian  Neolithic  (farmers)  

Early  Neolithic  Europeans  (farmers)    

Late  Neolithic  Europeans  (farmers  admixed  with  hunters)    

Mesolithic  Europeans  (hunters-­‐gatheres)  

Bronze  Age  nomads  

West  Europe  

East  Europe  

Modern Europeans

Page 35: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

West  Asia  

East  Mesolithic  Europeans  (hunters-­‐gatheres)  

Page 36: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

West  Asia  

Anatolian    Neolithic    (farmers)  

East  Mesolithic  Europeans  (hunters-­‐gatheres)  

Page 37: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

West  Asia  

Anatolian    Neolithic    (farmers)  

Early  Neolithic  Europeans  (farmers)    

East  Mesolithic  Europeans  (hunters-­‐gatheres)  

Page 38: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

West  Asia  

Anatolian    Neolithic    (farmers)  

Late  Neolithic  Europeans    (farmers  admixed  with  hunters)    

East  Mesolithic  Europeans  (hunters-­‐gatheres)  

Page 39: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

West  Asia  

Anatolian    Neolithic    (farmers)  

Late  Neolithic  Europeans    (farmers  admixed  with  hunters)    

East  Mesolithic  Europeans  (hunters-­‐gatheres)  

Page 40: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

West  Asia  

Anatolian    Neolithic    (farmers)  

Late  Neolithic  Europeans    (farmers  admixed  with  hunters)    

Bronze  Age  nomads  

Page 41: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

West  Asia  

Anatolian    Neolithic    (farmers)  

Late  Neolithic  Europeans    (farmers  admixed  with  hunters)    

Bronze  Age  nomads  

Page 42: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

West  Asia  

Anatolian    Neolithic    (farmers)  

Late  Neolithic  Europeans    (farmers  admixed  with  hunters)    

Modern Europeans

Bronze  Age  nomads  

Page 43: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Another  study,  the  same  result    (Allentoa  et  al.,  2015,  Nature)  

Page 44: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Another  study,  the  same  result    (Allentoa  et  al.,  2015,  Nature)  

Third  millennium  BC  

Page 45: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Another  study,  the  same  result    (Allentoa  et  al.,  2015,  Nature)  

Second  millennium  BC  

Page 46: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Plague  in  Bronze  Age  Eurasia  (Rasmussen  et  al.,  2015,  Cell)  

The  same  ancient  human  samples  have  been  tested  for  Yersinia  pes+s.  

7  out  of  102  samples  were  posi8ve.  

Page 47: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

1)  Bronze  Age  samples  lacked  the  ymt  gene  on  pMT1  plasmide.    The  gene  allows  Y.pes8s  to  be  

spread  by  rat  flea.  ymt   gene   is   first   recorded   in   single  sample  dated  1700  BC,  but  since  1000  AD  it  is  omnipresent  (98%  of  Y.  pes8s  samples)  –  natural  selec8on?!  

Comparing  Bronze  Age,  Medieval  and  Contemporary  Yersinia  pes+s  genomes.    

2)  Bronze  Age  samples  also  lacked  the   I259T   muta8on   on   the   pla  gene.    This  muta8on  causes  the  bubonic  form  of  plague.  

Bronze  Age  Y.pes8s  Jus8nian  plague  Black  Death  Modern  Y.  pes8s  Y.  pseudotuberculosis  

Page 48: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Due  to  analysis  of  ancient  DNA,  one  can  directly  see  the  evolu8on  

of  Yersinia  pes8s:  from  less  virulent  and  less  see  Bronze  Age  samples  lacked  the  ymt  gene  on  pMT1  plasmide.    The  gene  allows  Y.pes8s  to  be  

spread  by  rat  flea.  

Origin  and  diversity  of  Yersinia  pes+s    Y.  Pseudotuberculosis  (in  blue)  Y.pes8s  (in  red)  

Bronze  Age  plague  (1700-­‐2900  BC)  Jus8nian  plague  (600  AD)  Black  Death  (1350  AD)  

Page 49: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

Now  one  can  directly  see  the  evolu8on  of  Yersinia  pes+s:  from  the  frequent,  less  virulent  and  less  dangerous  disease  in  Bronze  Age  

to  the  medieval  BLACK  DEATH.  

Ancient  DNA  and  Yersinia  pes+s    

Many  archeologists,  linguists  and  gene8cists  believe,  that  Bronze  Age  nomads  from  Eurasian  Steppe  spoke  proto-­‐Indo-­‐European  language    –  the  common  root  of  languages  spoken  by  3  billion  people  today.  

 Were  the  same  nomads  responsible  for  triggering  the  evolu8on  of  Y.  pes8s  to  higher  virulence?    

“It  is  plausible  that  plague  outbreaks  could  have  facilitated—or  have  been  facilitated  by—these  highly  dynamic  demographic  events”  (Rasmussen  et  

al.,  2015).  

Then,  these  Bronze  Age  events  exemplifies  interrelated  evolu8on    of  pathogen  and  host.    

Page 50: of Global Gene Pool Structure - Georgia Tech Bioinformatics

We have both, European and Asian haplogroups in our region. However, for comparison purposes, all populations are analyzed by the same panel of SNPs. Thus, the phylogenetic resolution is identical for all genotyped populations. Up to date, we had 59 SNPs in the panel. Now we are increasing panel up to 80 SNPs.

Our team (on the geographical map) thanks your for your attention