October 30, 2001 Bruce Rothney Managing Director Is Everything Going to be OK? The new reality, and its implications for private equity
Apr 01, 2015
October 30, 2001
Bruce Rothney
Managing Director
Is Everything Going to be OK?
The new reality,
and its implications for private equity
RBC Capital Markets
Extensive Corporate Relationships
80 analysts covering over 800 companies
30 analysts covering technology and communications
Ranked #1 Overall by Canadian Fund Managers
- Reuters Survey 2000
Ranked #1 for ideas and #3 for quality by US investors
- 2000 Greenwich Associates Survey
80 analysts covering over 800 companies
30 analysts covering technology and communications
Ranked #1 Overall by Canadian Fund Managers
- Reuters Survey 2000
Ranked #1 for ideas and #3 for quality by US investors
- 2000 Greenwich Associates Survey
Focused and Credible Research
“RBC DS, the best domestic M&A
house in Canada” - Euromoney 2000
Results in 2000:• advised in 14 of the 20 largest transactions involving Canadian targets• eighth ranked advisor in North American
Technology and Communications M&A
“RBC DS, the best domestic M&A
house in Canada” - Euromoney 2000
Results in 2000:• advised in 14 of the 20 largest transactions involving Canadian targets• eighth ranked advisor in North American
Technology and Communications M&A
Top M&A Advisor
One of North America’s leading growth investment banks
Pro-AMS Trust
RBC Capital Markets
Expanding North American Retail Distribution Capabilities
Combined North American Retail Sales Force:
Investment Advisors: 3,772
Total Assets Under Management: US$168 Billion
Combined North American Retail Sales Force:
Investment Advisors: 3,772
Total Assets Under Management: US$168 Billion
Largest Canadian Retail Distribution Network
Comparison of Canadian Investment Dealers
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
RBC DS BMO NesbittBurns
Merrill LynchCanada
CIBC WorldMarkets
Scotia Capital TD Securities
Retail Assets Under Management
(C$ Billions)
0
300
600
900
1,200
1,500
1,800
Number of Retail Brokers
AUM Brokers
RBC Capital Markets
Provideseed capital
Start-up
Provideventure
capital &merchantbanking
Growth
Placeequity
securitieswith
institutionalinvestors
Expansion
Manageentrance
into publicequity
markets
IPO
Issuefollow-on
equity & debtsecurities
Addl. PublicFinancings
Providecomprehensive
follow-onsupport
Research& Trading
Mergers &Acquisitions
sell-side/buy-side
Advisory
RBVI RBC Cap Partners
EPPG
RBC Capital Markets
KBI Banking
RBC Financial Group - Life cycle approach to financing
What a difference a year makes
The Bubble has Burst - Then and Now
Then
Real economy captivated by technology Moving from bricks to clicks
Tremendous IPO & M&A returns Public/private take-out “Bubble”
Virtually unlimited new VC capital formation Billion dollar funds New VC’s entering the game Corporate investment arms established Crossover funds played the quick flip
Thousands of VC funded technology and communications companies
Now
Limited (or negative) growth in IT spending Telecom spending at support levels
Exit opportunities are limited Collapse of unrealistic growth expectations
Only experienced VC’s can raise capital Some funds completely written off Some VC’s are in survival mode Corporate investment arms are reducing or
eliminating their investment activity Crossover funds are focused on public market
opportunities, if anything at all
Investment levels have returned to pre-bubble levels
Then
The Latin word for
“close your eyes and open your mouth”
is prospectus
Dogbert Venture Capital
The picnic’s over
Now
Nortel Picnic
U.S. Investment Returns (as of June 30, 2001)
Returns are down significantly
Source: Venture Economics & National Venture Capital Association
Fund Type 3 Mths 6 Mths 1 Year 3 Year 5 Year 10 Year 20 Year
Early/Seed (3.3%) (14.3%) (20.6%) 81.4% 55.1% 34.5% 22.4%Balanced (2.6%) (13.6%) (16.1%) 46.3% 35.5% 24.7% 16.6%Later Stage (2.7%) (11.3%) (16.3%) 28.3% 24.6% 25.4% 17.4%Buyouts 2.2% (1.7%) (7.2%) 6.1% 11.9% 14.4% 16.5%Mezzanine 0.0% 2.6% 20.8% 11.0% 11.3% 12.2% 11.6%
All Private Equity 0.4% (6.0%) (11.3%) 20.1% 21.7% 20.2% 17.8%
Source: Venture Economics & National Venture Capital Association
* Based on returns from venture capital funds with 60% and above concentration in a particular industry
Industry 3 Mths 1 Year 3 Year 5 Year
Communications (7.0%) (38.3%) 69.7% 43.4%Computer Related (0.6%) (12.1%) 7.3% 0.6%Internet Specific (8.2%) (27.7%) 35.7% 33.8%Biotech/Pharmaceuticals 3.3% 12.4% 60.6% 42.5%Medical/Health 3.7% (6.3%) 12.9% 12.6%
The New Reality
U.S. Exit Summary of VC-Backed Companies (as of June 30, 2001)
M&A is currently the only available exit
Source: Thomson Financial/Venture Economics & National Venture Capital Association
* Value of IPO based on shares offered
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
# o
f E
xits
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 YTD 2001
M&A IPO
391
295 274
486 533
160
$0.0
$20.0
$40.0
$60.0
$80.0
$100.0
Val
ue
of
Exi
ts (
US
$ B
)
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 YTD 2001
M&A IPO*
$20.3 $12.7 $13.0
$55.9
$92.1
$10.7
The New Reality
U.S. VC Fund Raising
Experienced VC’s continue to raise capital
Source: Thomson Financial/Venture Economics & National Venture Capital Assoc.
* 2001 figures have been annualized based on six months figures to June 30, 2001
$0.0
$30.0
$60.0
$90.0
$120.0
$150.0
$180.0
Fu
nd
s R
aise
d (
US
$ B
)
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001*
Venture Capital Buyout/Mezzanine
The New Reality
Canadian Investments (as of June 30, 2001)
Canadian investing ahead of 2000 pace, for now
Source: Macdonald & Associates Limited
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$7
1998 1999 2000 H1 2000 H1 2001
Inve
stm
ent
(C$
B)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
# o
f C
om
pan
ies
Capital Invested Companies Funded
The New Reality
U.S. Investments by Quarter (as of June 30, 2001)
The U.S. reverts to early 1999 levels
Source: National Venture Capital Association
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
Q1
1998
Q2
1998
Q3
1998
Q4
1998
Q1
1999
Q2
1999
Q3
1999
Q4
1999
Q1
2000
Q2
2000
Q3
2000
Q4
2000
Q1
2001
Q2
2001
Inve
stm
ent
(US
$ B
)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
# o
f C
om
pan
ies
Capital Invested Companies Funded
The New Reality
Difficult times often produce opportunities
1972/73 - Intel
1985/86 - Microsoft, AOL, Apple
1990/91 - Oracle, Cisco
Criteria for success
Cash, patient investors, great fundraising capability Far easier to find “pile-on” money than lead investors
Partnerships / alliances
Management
Real markets / lead customers
Self evident value proposition lower capital cost, reduce operating expenses, increase efficiency………
Reduced investor returns means competing for less capital
What Does this Mean for Great Private Companies
Industries going “no-bid”
Anything “dot com”
Photonics
Travel related
Industry Opportunities
Energy and power technology
Life sciences
Other leading edge technologies, like quantum computing and nanotechnology
What was hot, is now not
What Does this Mean for Great Private Companies
Terms of Investment
The investor is clearly in the driver’s seat
What Does this Mean for Great Private Companies
1999/2000 2001
Purchasers Mostly new investors Requires significant support from existing investors
Valuation Multiple of revenue / engineers Cashflow based (down-rounds and performance ratchets are commonplace)
Offering Size Often larger than originally planned for, with no identified use of proceeds for the additional amount
Shrinking in absolute terms, but increasing in percentage terms as valuations fallLead conditional on hitting minimum to meet plan
Liquidation Preference Last money in, first money out Double or triple dips (or more)
Liquidation Event At value less than purchase price Any event
Anti-Dilution Clause Weighted average Full ratchet
Protective Provisions On senior and par security issuances On debt, asset sales, capex and operational decisions
Board Representation Membership Control
Option Dilution On existing options On options to be issued
Investor Returns As converted to common Guaranteed return to IPO (2-3x)
Purchase Rights First offer First refusal (trump right)
President's List No mention Right to direct pro-rata share
Definition for success
Same goals, different scale Returns in line with historic levels
Emphasis on acquisitions Private to private deals and roll-ups
Exiting an investment in years (rather than months)
How should Angels and VCs behave?
Take their time - cash is KING
Handcrafting companies - less capital, more time
Low entry valuations
Conservative milestone phased funding structures
4 to 7 years to liquidity
Less deals started, more time to effect each one
Everyone can’t be Barry Bonds
Implications for Angels
Many VC’s are fully invested with no liquidity in sight
U.S. finds who gorged on dot coms are suffering
Canadian funds who filled up on photonics have limited options
Angels can play a more prominent role in building/funding promising management teams
VC Firms are being very conservative with respect to investing in new names
Focused on existing portfolio - protecting their best companies
Increased emphasis on due diligence
With public markets all but shut down, a strong desire to “keep powder dry” with existing cash
VC’s are facing the same challenges as their portfolio companies
Difficulty attracting new investment
Performance is not meeting previous expectations
Weaker players are disappearing
The venture capital landscape is changing
Implications for Angels
In Conclusion...
The biggest risk we all face,
is not being willing to continue taking risks
Angels are more important than ever