Top Banner
OC, June 3, 2004 1 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module ndrei Tokovinin icole van der Bliek
23

OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

Jan 02, 2016

Download

Documents

Charleen Byrd
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 1

SAM –SOAR Adaptive

Module

SAM –SOAR Adaptive

Module

Andrei TokovininNicole van der Bliek

Page 2: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 2

SAM = SOAR Adaptive Module

SAM = SOAR Adaptive Module

1:1 SAM focus feeds: -Visitor Instrument (SIFS)-Built-in CCD imager

SAM corrects ground-layerturbulencewith a UV Laser Guide Star

SAM corrects ground-layerturbulencewith a UV Laser Guide Star

Page 3: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 3

GroundLayerAdaptiveOptics

GroundLayerAdaptiveOptics

Seeing-limited (>90% of ground-based astronomy!)

=Better seeingin wider field

Diffraction limit

(full AO or MCAO)

GLAO works in the visible

Complete sky coverage

GLAO works in the visible

Complete sky coverage

Page 4: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 4

Science with SAMScience with SAM

Dynamics of galaxies, AGNs (+SIFS or F-P)

Stellar populations, clusters (confusion!)

Supernovae, Cepheids Weak lensing ISM (PNe, jets)

and more…GLAO benefits “classical” astronomical programs GLAO benefits “classical” astronomical programs

Page 5: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 5

25% 50% 75%

β,” 0.94 1.11 1.33

0.5μm 0.38 0.53 0.71

0.7μm 0.22 0.31 0.49

1μm 0.17 0.22 0.30

Based on real turbulence profiles at Cerro Pachon !Based on real turbulence profiles at Cerro Pachon !

Performance: FWHM on-axis

Performance: FWHM on-axis

2x

5x SAM improves the “seeing”by 2-5 times

SAM improves the “seeing”by 2-5 times

Page 6: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 6

The whole FOV is well compensated

The whole FOV is well compensated

PSF contours 0.1--0.5--0.9 of maxat different locations inthe 3’x3’ FOV for a representativeturbulence profile (80% near the ground)

PSF contours 0.1--0.5--0.9 of maxat different locations inthe 3’x3’ FOV for a representativeturbulence profile (80% near the ground)

center

corner

Page 7: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 7

SAM in numbersSAM in

numbersDM Bimorph, 50mm pupil, 60 electrodes

WFS S-H 9x9, CCD-39 pixel 0.35”, 8x8

Laser Tripled Nd:YAG 355nm, 8W, 10 kHz

LLT D=30cm, behind secondary, H=10km

Gating KD*P Pockels cell, dH=150m

Tip-tilt Two probes, fiber-linked APDs, R<18

Focal plane 3’x3’ square, 3 arcsec/mm, f/16.5

CCD imager 4Kx4K, 0.05” pixels, 6 filters

Coll. space 50mm beam, 120mm along axis

Page 8: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 8

SAMSAM

All-reflectiveExcellent qualityCollimated space

All-reflectiveExcellent qualityCollimated space

Page 9: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 9Electronics

Electronics

Page 10: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 10

Software

Software

Page 11: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 11

Turbulence Simulator

Turbulence Simulator

Developed by Sandrine Thomas – a PhD student working on SAM

Developed by Sandrine Thomas – a PhD student working on SAM

Use: instrumentcontrol and optimization,Software development

Soon: closed-loop in real time with TurSim and SAM SWSoon: closed-loop in real time with TurSim and SAM SW

Page 12: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 12

Systems engineering is considered seriously

Systems engineering is considered seriously

LGS: “set-and-forget”? Rugged industrial laser, no airplane/space hazards NGS for tip-tilt: automatic acquisitionLoop optimization, PSF predictionBuilt-in turbulence simulatorSmooth interaction with the telescope

Goal: build an easy-to-use AO instrumentGoal: build an easy-to-use AO instrument

Page 13: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 13

SAM teamSAM team

Andrei Tokovinin - project scientistNicole van der Bliek – project managerBrooke Gregory – project scientist Sandrine Thomas - PhD studentPatricio Schurter – mechanical engineerRolando Cantarutti – software engineerEduardo Mondaca – electronics engineer

Page 14: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 14

Project Organization

• Project Manager, Project Scientists / Systems Engineers, Lead Mechanical, Electronic and Software Engineers, plus a PhD student

• Review process – External CoDR*, delta-CoDR*, PDR– Internal reviews of subassemblies

• WBS, project plan & design notes– Support on project management aspects

from Tucson MIP staff

* Passed successfully

Page 15: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 15

A phased project

• Phase 0 – Concept development complete1:1 corrected image delivered to SOAR instruments

Focus is on LGS wide field mode

Collimated space included for future Fabry-Perot

• Phase 1 – NGS AO under way– AO module, incl. Tip-tilt

• Phase 2 – LGS AO next step– Laser– Beam transport optics and launch telescope

Page 16: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 16

Project statusJune 2004

• Successfully passed delta-CoDR last January • Advancing in Phase 1• Milestones since delta-CoDR

– 11 reached– 8 left before PDR

• PDR to be held in Aug/Sept.

Page 17: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 17

After PDR – Finishing Phase 1

Design, plan, procure, fabricateReady for assembling sub-systems mid FY05

Assemble, test & commissionStart commissioning end FY05 / beginning FY06

And on to Phase 2LGS system

Procure, fabricate, assemble, test & commission

Page 18: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 18

Management issues

• Balancing shared resources SOAR commissioning, other support tasks within NOAO

• Pacing of project in line with NOAO budget• SOAR Interfaces

e.g. ISB cage modifications

• Aspects of the planning processEnsure sufficient time for studies of various tradeoffs

Page 19: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 19

Concluding remarks• Direct impact of SAM:

– Enhanced capability of SOAR 0.7” 0.3”, for 3’ FOV– Proving GLAO: important NOAO contribution to community

• Challenges for NOAO South:set & meet reasonable expectations w/r to performance, budget & schedule– moderately big project, fairly high visibility for NOAO South– scientific and technical resources are in-house

• And for Greater NOAO– Increase AO expertise within NOAO– A successful SAM will enhance NOAO’s capacity to produce

future instrumentation for large telescopes

Page 20: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 20

Page 21: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 21

Milestones reachedJune 2004

• Successfully passed δ-CoDR• DM selected & ordered • Optical design frozen• Studies of concept tradeoffs finished:

– Pockels Cell vs Gated CCD– Launch telescope concept– Modelling of tt guide star requirements– Comparison of analytical/Monte Carlo models– Comparison APDs and PMTs for TT sensors

• Completed & tested TurSim• Reconstructor algorithm implemented• Implementation of DAC control for DM

Page 22: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 22

Before PDRAug/Sept 2004

– Close loop in lab– Design AO module housing– Tolerance and specify optics – Detail WFS design – Design Laser Launch Telescope, Beam transfer

optics (preliminary)– Prepare alignment plan– Elaborate science case– Plan Phase 2

Tasks can be carried out in parallel

Page 23: OC, June 3, 20041 SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.

OC, June 3, 2004 23

After PDR – Finishing Phase 1

FY05• Design, plan, procure, fabricate– Procure optics– Complete design and fabricate module– Detail alignment plan– Prepare Integration & Test plan– Plan commissioning– Detail design of laser system

• Assemble, test & commission– Test core AO system in laboratory– Test subassemblies and software modules (some in parallel)– Integrate & align complete instrument – Test in lab – Commission @ telescope => end FY05/beginning FY06