Top Banner
3

Observations on Some Epidemiological Factors of ...€¦ · Sept., 1939] EPIDEMIOLOGICAL FACTORS OF TUBERCULOSISi SANJIVI 527 OBSERVATIONS on SOME EPIDEMIOL- OGICAL FACTORS OF TUBERCULOSIS.

Oct 24, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • Sept., 1939] EPIDEMIOLOGICAL FACTORS OF TUBERCULOSISi SANJIVI 527

    OBSERVATIONS on SOME EPIDEMIOL- OGICAL FACTORS OF TUBERCULOSIS. tat o^TTrT,TT T^TT^T1 yy IN SOUTH INDIA

    (As STUDIED FROM CASES AT THE GOVERNMENT Tuberculosis Hospital, Madras)

    By K. S. SANJIVI, m.d.

    (Madras Medical Service)

    sioi HIS ^aPer a^tempts to draw certain conclu-

    ciil18? 0l] ^le ePidemiology of pulmonary tuber-

    tiv0818 m an analysis of a thousand consecu-

    st G,. ?J)en cases and a thousand radiographs, tut

    1

    a r^le Government Tuberculosis Insti-.

    T ki rra?' durinS 1936-37.

    one 3 gives the age incidence of the 1,000 n eases, 709 males and 291 females :?

    Table I

    Age

    fess than 15 15-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 Above 84

    . It will be seen that high tuberculosis morbidity

    ln females starts a decade earlier than in males and does not appear to be so much a problem in ?, i'ly women as in elderly men. That moie ^an 10 per cent of male consumptives are past

    years is an important fact to be remembeied, a large number of them pass off as chronic

    "rachitics; 6.9 per cent of all the cases had Wheezing at the time of examination. It is

    remember that 1 all that wheezes is not

    asthma'. The importance of this distribution 0 the economic life of the community by 83.3 ?r cent of the ailing men and 91.9 per cent of le ailing women being between the ages of 15 a*Kl 44^ js j-0Q obvious to be dilated upon*.

    figure 1 shows that tuberculosis is no longei ??*fined to urban areas. This rural permeation

    ?nly to be expected, considering the rapid

    ^These figures do not present the true sex ac tion of tuberculosis, but only the distribution Jjjongst those attending the tuberculosis institute, hn,? ,ec?uomically more important members ot a first would tend to apply for medical relie ^??Editor, I. M. G.]

    [/communications that exist to-day, the frequent exchange of men between the fields and the factories, and the comparative virgin state of the soil in the villages.

    The 709 males have been classified below

    according to their occupation

    Table II

    Showing occupational incidence of tuberculosis

    Farmers .. S9

    Coolies .. 71

    Mill-workers .. 55

    Clerks .. 45

    Food-handlers (milk- men, cooks, bakers, etc.) .. 45

    Petty merchants .. 39

    Peons .. 24

    Domestic servants 24

    Press-workers .. 23

    Students .. 21

    Teachers .. 18

    Gold- and silver- smiths .. 16

    Weavers

    Tailors

    Sweepers Motor-drivers

    Carpenters Blacksmiths

    Beedi- makers

    Masons

    Policemen

    Cartmen

    Fishermen

    Painters

    Unemployed

    Miscellaneous

    15

    15

    15

    15

    14

    13

    12

    7

    5

    71

    33

    When we consider the numbers actually engaged in each of these occupations (of which we have no accurate information) perhaps tuberculosis surveys amongst mill-workers, press-men, tailors, beedi-makers and weavers are likely to yield valuable data.

    Whenever tuberculosis is diagnosed in an upper class family?and it is by no means rare among them?one hears loud protestations that it cannot be, as there has been no previous family history. Even so, how can the richest escape tuberculous infection when the food- handlers and children-handlers (teachers, ser- vants, motor-drivers, ete.) form as much as 16.7 per cent in the above table.

    6 3-4% UPBAN

    Fig. 1. Fig. 1.

  • 528 THE INDIAN MEDICAL GAZETTE [Sept.,

    Table III

    Shoiving death rate of children of tuberculous persons

    Males

    Females

    Num- ber

    married

    354

    216

    Number of

    children born

    1,324

    623

    Number of

    children (under

    10 years) dead

    528

    164

    Percentage dead

    39.9

    26.3

    The percentage death rate for children under 10 in the general population is 4.0 (Russell, 1938)*. The death rate in the children of tuber- culous parents is considerably more. The definitely greater risk to the offspring

    when the open case is the father may be due to two reasons :?

    Firstly, an incapacitated parent stays indoors all the time, and,

    Secondly, the set-back in the economic level of the family due to the bread-winner's illness tells on the resistance of the children.

    Of the 216 married women, 58 or 26.9 per cent dated their symptoms from a previous child- birth or abortion. Tuberculosis should not be forgotten in the differential diagnosis of fevers in child-bed. The number of the pregnancies did not appear to be of any significance.

    Table IV

    Showing the duration of the disease at the time of seeking treatment at the institute

    Number of

    cases

    Less than 15 days .. 32 15 days to 1 month 87 1 to 2 months .. 119 2 to 3 ? .. 133

    Number of

    cases

    3 to 6 months .. 265 6 to 12

    ? .. 175 More than 1 year 189

    It will be seen that only a third of the total have sought treatment earlier than three to six months after the manifestation of symptoms. Unless something effective is done to avoid this general delay it will be difficult to convince people that tuberculosis is curable.

    Table V

    Showing the initial symptoms complained of in these 1,000 cases

    Fever alone .. .. .. 73 Cough alone or with weakness .. 405 Fever and cough .. .. 386 Haemoptysis .. .. 40 Loss of weight or weakness .. 58 Pain in the chest .. .. 28 Dyspepsia .. .. 10

    Apart from the cases of initial hssmopty? >

    224 others had spat blood some time during ^ illness, haemoptysis thus occurring in 26.4 P cent of all the cases. The importance of

    11

    ignoring a persistent unexplained cough, *eV,iy weakness or hamioptysis must be urgen

    )

    brought home to the general practitioner, j51 ^ will educating the general practitioner a } ensure diagnosis ? From table VI it will be se that 49.7 per cent in this series had tried vari?

    non-descriptive, non-allopathic remedies t>e*

    coming to the tuberculosis institute.

    Table VI _

    Allopathic hospital or dispensary .. 406

    Allopathic private practitioner .. Non-descriptive remedies .. ^97

    This takes us to the larger question of or&a ization of medical relief for the poorer c^a^u"e' which is outside the scope of this paper. fact that 82.7 per cent of these 1,000 open

    ca

    had gone beyond the stage of suitability artificial pneumothorax further illustrates urgent need for facilities for early diagn?^ and treatment. With the very meagre in*3tl., , tional accommodation we have, the vast ma^irpjr of these advanced cases are turned back to t

    homes where conditions are ideal for the rap g dissemination of the seeds of tuberculosis. means of segregating the advanced open

    ca

    must, therefore, form a vital part of any P

    gramme of tuberculosis control. , ^j]e Every case which, on a consideration oi

    symptoms, Mantoux test, sputum exarninajpnt and clinical examination by two indepen'a observers (the assistant surgeon and the

    di

    tor) appeared to be a case of pulmonary tu ^ culosis in whichever stage was .T-rayed. ln ^e country sifting of other evidence has to pre

  • septv 1939] BRONCHIECTASIS : UKIL & DE 529

    apparently peri-bronchial in distribution gave a history of cough, bouts of fever, lassitude, etc.

    Mantoux reaction and clinical examination gave further grounds for suspecting tuberculosis and they were x-rayed.

    I can recall several cases in each of which a

    Skiagram taken at the onset of the illness showed bese appearances which were ignored and a few P^onths later dense circular deposits appeared 111 the same region. But mostly, this type

    of

    case is resistant with a tendency to localization fibrosis. Descriptions of similar appearances

    fre given by Fishberg (1932) although he says he idea of peri-bronchial tuberculosis has been

    abandoned at present'. Perhaps it is best to

    ?aH this tvpe ' early spreading granuloma following Wingfield (1937) and with him insist

    the diagnosis of tuberculosis at this stage.

    Table VIII

    Showing percentage incidences of different _ lesions

    U cases with cavities Cavities with hard fibrous A/r^l^ among the above .. iynd-zone lesions-?

    In left lung In right lung

    Present series

    42.9

    20.0

    28.7 26.6

    Dr. Benjamin's series (1938)

    73.3

    5.9

    73.1 71.2

    a ?r Purposes of the above table, the percent-

    age has been calculated on the 840 active cases, - eluding the 160 cases in group A with no active disease. A sanatorium gets only selected cases referred

    co t other doctors, and usually, in our

    f llj !'y, only at a stage when the private doctor in+??

    can tackle it no longer. It is hardly

    Ind 0 conc^uc^e

    ' th&t the disease in

    litt/f11 Pa^en^s ^ acute, rapidly developing with hp v tendency to show a natural resistance

    and

    Sam

    ' ?n a study ?t a defin^ely selected

    Par ' ^le Present study based on an out-

    lent population Of a tuberculosis institution

    ta?WS that such an alarmist view need not be $er'en the type of the disease. Even this ?nlleVS' a^er a^> a selected group, and it is Se,y by the extensive random surveys of un- a

    e,c ed groups together with the recognition of

    sitf 6 ' tuberculosis minor' that the exact

    soi u ?n Regarding the type of tuberculosis in

    h India can be gauged.

    the -pv.t'lanks are due to Dr. K. Vasudeva Rao, st ,^lrector, for permission to make

    the above

    Ma y at the Government Tuberculosis Institute,

    ^ , References

    VolG1r'^^n' P- V. (1938). Indian Med. Gaz., FiiuXIII? P- 54?-

    Vol y 5' M. (1932). Pulmonary Tuberculosis.

    Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia. (Continued at foot of next column)

    \

    (Continued from -previous column)

    Russell, A. J. H. (1938). Ann. Rep. Pub. Health Commissioner, Govt, oj India, 1936. Vol. I., Manager of Publications, Delhi.

    Wingfield, R. C. (1937). Pulmonary Tuberculosis in. Practice. Edward Arnold and Co., London.