Top Banner
Observation on Current Helicity and Subsurface Kinetic Helicity in Solar Active Regions Gao Yu 2013.10 Helicity Thinkshop Main Collaborators: Zhang, H. Q., Su, J. T., Xu, H. Q., Zhao, J., Sokoloff, D., Kuzanyan, K., Sakurai, T. Beijin g
28

Observation on Current Helicity and Subsurface Kinetic Helicity in Solar Active Regions

Feb 24, 2016

Download

Documents

daria

Observation on Current Helicity and Subsurface Kinetic Helicity in Solar Active Regions. Gao Yu. Main Collaborators: Zhang, H. Q., Su, J. T., Xu , H. Q., Zhao, J., Sokoloff , D., Kuzanyan , K., Sakurai, T. Helicity Thinkshop. Beijing. 2013.10. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Observation on Current Helicity and Subsurface Kinetic Helicity in Solar Active Regions

Gao Yu

2013.10Helicity Thinkshop

Main Collaborators:

Zhang, H. Q., Su, J. T., Xu, H. Q., Zhao, J., Sokoloff, D., Kuzanyan, K., Sakurai, T.

Beijing

Page 2: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

“Sunspots do not appear at random over the sun’s surface, but are concentrated in two latitude bands on either side of the equator”

Hathaway, 2010, Living Rev., Solar Phys.

Page 3: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Parker dynamo model

2

2

1

1

A B AtB v A Bt

Poloidal Field

Toroidal Field

α-effect(“ Cyclonic motion”)

(“Differential rotation”)

Page 4: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Sokoloff, 2007, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion ,49, B447–B452

Any impovement today?

Page 5: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Helicity in Active Regions Derived From Vector Magnetogram

• Hemispheric Helicity Sign Rule from magnetic measurement (HSR): In the northern (southern) solar hemisphere, the helicity mainly possesses left (right) handedness (Seehafer 1990; Pevtsov et al. 1995; Wang et al. 1996; Bao & Zhang 1998; Hagino & Sakurai 2004; Zhang et al. 2010; Hao & Zhang 2012);

• HSR may change during some phase of solar cycle (Bao & Zhang, 2000; Hagino & Sakurai 2005; Zhang et al. 2010; Hao and Zhang 2012).

It may provide observations that reveal some CLUES, although it is still far from characterizing the α-effect.

Page 6: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Definition of Main Parameters

z

zzav

zzc

zz

BBsignB

BBH

BJ

][)(

,)(

,)(1

0

Vertical electric current, current helicity and average force free field factor:

Page 7: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Effects on interpreting magnetic field from polarized light

• Calibration accuracy due to measurement on certain filtering position of spectral line FeI 5324.19 Å;

• Shift of measuring wavelength due to temperature;• Magnetic saturation effects for strong longitudinal

magnetic field;• 180◦ ambiguity of transversal azimuth;• Projection effects for the transversal field of active region

far away from the center of solar disk;• Faraday rotations for the transversal azimuth;• …Even so, it was proved that some global features of helicity can be obtained by way of statistics.

Page 8: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Estimation on influence of Faraday rotations on azimuth of measured transverse field

Bao et al., 2000

Up to now, Huairou Solar Observing Station has sustained vector magnetic field measurement over more than 25 years;

Faraday rotations need a quantitative estimation in statistical analysis of current and helicity.

Page 9: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Su and Zhang 2004

Zhang 2000

1. Less Faraday rotation when measuring at the wing of spectral line;

2. Small rotation azimuths but closely relate to field strength and inclination.

Page 10: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Any common distribution of azimuth error in different active regions?

Page 11: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

<Δδφ> (º)Bz (G)

Ψ (º) 200-300 300-400 400-500 500-600 600-700 700-800 800-900

72-75 2.469-72 3.3 4.166-69 3.4 4.0 5.763-66 4.1 5.2 6.060-63 5.5 4.8 6.4 6.957-60 5.0 5.3 7.554-57 6.0 4.3 7.851-54 7.5 8.6 8.548-51 7.3 9.9 10.845-48 9.3 10.342-45 7.9 9.5

Gao , Su , Xu, & Zhang, 2008, MNRAS

Page 12: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Removal of false net current in strong field area (|Bz| >500 G) of solar active regions

1. Numbers of active regions : 983 , Numbers of Magnetogram : 6205 ;

2. Time period : 1988 - 2005 , 22nd cycle :431 , 23rd cycle : 553 ;

Zero false net current justifies a statistical estimation of Faraday rotation effects;

Page 13: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Evolution of spatial distribution of current helicity over two cycles

• Average helicity values over 7 degree and overlapping two year period;

• 95% confidence interval is given by taking each measured point as a freedom degree;

• The HSR percentage is about 66% (63%) in the 22nd cycle and 58% (57%) in the 23rd cycle for Hc.

Zhang, Sakurai, Pevtsov, Gao, Xu, Sokoloff & Kuzanyan 2010, MNRAS

Page 14: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Net electric current in opposite polarity area of solar active regions

• Compute net electric current on regions of opposite polarity .

• Tiny but not trivial net current exists and validates the sign preference of helicity in the solar active regions.

Gao, 2013, RAA

Page 15: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Normal Probability Paper applied for distribution of current helicity

Gao, Sakurai, Zhang, Kuzanyan & Sokoloff 2012, MNRAS

Page 16: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Bins of statistically significant in butterfly diagram

The second Gaussian component of helicity determine whether HSR holds.

Page 17: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Cycle dependence of distribution of vector magnetic field in active regions

Page 18: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

mvd

α-effect contains two parts of contributions (Pouquet et al., 1976) :

Hydrodynamic helicity: ~ v· (curl v);

The advance in helioseismology make the detection of the vector velocity field, thus the kinetic helicity available (Zhao & Kosovichev 2003);

Magnetic helicity, in the solar observation (Seehafer, 1990; Pevtsov et al., 1995; Abramenko, Wang, & Yurchishin, 1996; Bao & Zhang 1998):

~<bz· (curl b)z>;

~<(curl b)z/bz>;

NOTE: Sun: Vorticity is observed AFTER current helicity!Earth: Vorticity is usually seen but helical magnetic field is seldomly seen.

Page 19: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Progress in observation•The one-to-one statistical comparison between the current and subsurface kinetic helicity of sampling active regions has been performed (Gao, Zhang, & Zhao, 2009; Maurya, Ambastha, & Reddy, 2011).

CC: -0.095, 0.118, -0.102, -0.179Data from different instruments have large timing lag.

Page 20: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Observation

NOAA AR11158:Observed from 10-Feb 2011 to 16-Feb 2011. Lied on -21 deg - +21 deg.

NOAA AR11283:Observed from 05-Sep 2011 to 09-Sep 2011.Lied on +14 deg - +18 deg.

SDO/HMI:Time-series data ;Vector magnetogram;Subsurface velocity field of flow (Zhao, 2012) .

Page 21: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Flow chart for the HMI time–distance helioseismology data-analysis pipeline

Zhao et al. 2012, Solar Physics

Page 22: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Evolution of magnetic and velocity field

2011-02-15 19:00:00 UT:FOV: 5.463’5.043’;Resolution: 0.504’’;Cadence: 12 minMax. |B|: 2356 G;Max. |B|: 2570 G

2011-02-15_14hr:FOV: 3.04’2’;Resolution: 1.008’’;Temporal Interval: 4 hr;Max. |V|: 441.8 ms-1;Max. |V|: 285 ms-1;

Page 23: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Snapshots do not show any clear corresponding features

Page 24: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

NOAA AR11158 : Weighted current helicity and kinetic helicity

Page 25: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

NOAA AR11283 : Weighted current helicity and kinetic helicity

Page 26: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

NOAA AR11302 : Weighted current helicity and kinetic helicity

Page 27: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Summary of main results• A statistical estimation of Faraday rotation effects on helicity

sign rule for Huairou vector magnetogram has been carried out;• Butterfly diagram of two-cycle current helicity were obtained

with HSOS data set and indicate more details that are helpful to develop mean field dynamo models;

• Net current, even if tiny, but exist and their distribution on polarity in active regions keep consistent with the Helicity Sign Rule;

• Evolution of photospheric current helicity shows a clear correlation with subsurface kinetic helicity, which was derived from independent measurement technique.

Page 28: Observation  on Current  Helicity  and Subsurface Kinetic  Helicity  in Solar Active Regions

Thank youfor your attention!