Top Banner

of 33

O_Bjaanes

Jun 01, 2018

Download

Documents

Marcos Tadsio
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    1/33

    part of Aker

    2011 Aker Solutions

    Risk Based InspectionDynamic optimisation of inspection plans

    ystein Bjaanes, Manager AIM Competence Centres

    part of Aker

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    2/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 2

    Content

    Aker Solutions in brief Who we are and what we do Risk Based Inspection Dynamic optimisation of inspection plans / integrated planning Non-Intrusive Inspection a significant contribution to optimisation

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    3/33

    part of Aker

    2011 Aker Solutions

    Who we are and

    what we do Aker SolutionsJanuary 2012

    part of Aker

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    4/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker

    In Brief

    Slide 4

    Aker Solutions in brief

    A leading global providerof engineering andtechnology, products andservice solutions to the oiland gas industry

    Employees: 18 000Contract staff: 4 600Operations in 30 countries

    Revenues and profits are for 2010Market value as of 04.11.2011

    Operatingrevenues

    NOK 33.4 bn

    Operatingprofit (EBITDA)NOK 3.3 bn

    Market

    capitalisationNOK 18.3 bn

    11th largeston OBX index

    http://www.akersolutions.com/NR/rdonlyres/9F747D0E-B281-43A3-B604-0305DF2EDD00/20975/DES004.jpg
  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    5/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker Slide 5

    Our vision and valuesBuil t on more than 170 years of industr ial tradition

    Our vision

    is to be " The preferred partner for solut ions in the oil and gas industry " through living ...

    Our values

    Customer drive

    HSEmindset

    Peopleand teams

    Open anddirect

    dialogue

    Hands-onmanage-

    ment

    Deliveringresults

    Buildingcustomer

    trust is key toour business

    We take personalresponsibility for

    HSE becausewe care

    All our major achievements

    are teamefforts

    We encourageearly and honestcommunication

    We know our business and get

    things done

    We deliver consistently and

    strive to beatour goals

    In Brief

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    6/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker In Brief

    Slide 9

    Engineering solutions

    Engineering providesfull field developmentunderstanding, front-enddesign and conceptualengineering

    Slide 9

    Aker Solutions main offerings

    Product solutions

    Field-life solutions

    Subsea productionsystems and lifecycleservices, wellheads,controls, manifolds andtie-in systems

    Drilling technologiesincl. full range of drillingequipment, drilling risersolutions and relatedproducts.

    Process systemstechnologies withinwater injection, gasprocessingconventional and heavyoil treatment, producedwater and sandhandling and others.

    Well i nterventionservices incl. wireline,wireline tractor,logging, light wellintervention etc.

    Oilfield Services &Marine Assets offersdeepwater wellintervention services andsubsea construction.

    Maintenance,Modifications &Operations specialistwho help oil companiesreduce operating costsand extend life-of-field.

    Umbilicals Static anddynamic umbilicalsand subsea powercable systems for theoil and gas sector

    Mooring and loadingsystems supply design,engineering and supply ofinnovative deckmachinery.

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    7/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker

    Aker Solutions Asset Integrity Management (AIM)

    MaintenancePlanning

    Execution

    Inspection &Monitoring

    Analysis &Improvement

    Maintenance

    Philosophy& Strategy

    Maintenanceprogramme &

    budget

    OPEX

    CAPEXData base

    I ICCPE

    Design Integrity

    Asset Integrity Management Services

    Maintenance frame agreement contractor

    ...is differentiated by providing AIM services from well to shore

    throughout the entire life cycle

    Maintenance & InspectionEngineering

    Technical Integrityanalysis & studies

    Data Management,Systems & Tools

    Advan ced Insp ecti on &Monitoring Technology

    In-Service Inspection &Corrosion Management

    Structural IntegrityManagement

    Subsea IntegrityManagement

    Fabrication & WeldInspection (NDT)

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    8/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 11

    Content

    Aker Solutions in brief Who we are and what we do Risk Based Inspection Dynamic optimisation of inspection plans / integrated planning Non-Intrusive Inspection a significant contribution to optimisation

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    9/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 12

    45VedlikeholdDen ansvarlige skal sikre at innretninger eller deler av disse holdes ved like, slik at de er i stand til utfre sine tiltenktefunksjoner i alle faser av levetiden.

    46KlassifiseringInnretningers systemer og utstyr skal klassifiseres med hensyn til konsekvensene for helse, milj og sikkerhet av potensiellefunksjonsfeil.For funksjonsfeil som kan fre til alvorlige konsekvenser, skal den ansvarlige identifisere de ulike feilmodiene medtilhrende feilrsaker og feilmekanismer, og ansl feilsannsynlig-heten for den enkelte feilmodusen.Klassifiseringen skal legges til grunn ved valg av vedlikeholdsaktiviteter og vedlikeholds-frekvens, ved prioritering av ulikevedlikeholdsaktiviteter og ved vurdering av reservedelsbehov.

    47VedlikeholdsprogramFeilmodi som utgjr en helse-, milj- eller sikkerhetsrisiko, jf. 44 , skal forebygges systematisk ved hjelp av etvedlikeholdsprogram.I programmet skal det inng aktiviteter for overvking av ytelse og teknisk tilstand, som sikrer at feilmodi som er underutvikling eller har inntrdt, blir identifisert og korrigert.Programmet skal ogs inneholde aktiviteter for overvking og kontroll av feilmekanismer som kan fre til slike feilmodi.

    48Planlegging og prioriteringDet skal utarbeides en samlet plan for utfring av vedlikeholdsprogram og korriger-ende vedlikeholdsaktiviteter, jf.styringsforskriften 12 .Det skal foreligge kriterier for setting av prioritet med tilhrende tidsfrister for utfring av de enkelte vedlikeholdsaktivitetene.Kriteriene skal ta hensyn til klassifiseringen som nevnt i 46 .

    Bakgrunn - Aktivitetsforskriften

    http://www.ptil.no/aktivitetsforskriften/aktivitetsforskriften-n-article3849-379.htmlhttp://www.ptil.no/styringsforskriften/styringsforskriften-n-article3857-382.htmlhttp://www.ptil.no/aktivitetsforskriften/aktivitetsforskriften-n-article3849-379.htmlhttp://www.ptil.no/aktivitetsforskriften/aktivitetsforskriften-n-article3849-379.htmlhttp://www.ptil.no/styringsforskriften/styringsforskriften-n-article3857-382.htmlhttp://www.ptil.no/aktivitetsforskriften/aktivitetsforskriften-n-article3849-379.html
  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    10/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 13

    Bakgrunn Vedlikeholdsstyringsslyfa,Ref. Basisstudien, OD1998

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    11/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 14

    Risk Based InspectionStart

    ScopeDevelopment

    Teamselection

    RBIScreeningworkshop

    Screeningconsequence

    level

    Documents& data for

    RBI

    Level 2 RBIassessment

    Risk level /inspection plan

    OK?

    Risk level /inspection plan

    OK?

    Detailedinspectionplanning

    End

    Significant

    Yes

    Yes

    No

    No

    Insignificant

    Screeningprobabilitylevel

    InsignificantSignificant

    Documents andmechanical

    data

    Correctivemaintenance

    PlannedCorrective

    maintenance

    Upload toCMMS &

    CIMS

    oo Integrity / inspection philosophyo risk matrix definition o

    Estimate PoF & CoFaccording to risk matrixdefinition

    Reviewengineering of

    item

    Screeningprobabilitylevel

    Significant Insignificant

    Monitor forPoF drivers

    PoFassessment

    CoFassessment

    Level 3 RBI assessment

    Risk Based Inspection Framework:

    RBI in accordance with DNV RP-G101 and API580/581

    Secure optimum availability at acceptablerisk

    Prioritize inspection efforts on the itemsdriving the risk

    Document the evaluation leading todefinition of inspection and condition

    monitoring programs Can be used to inform relevant stake

    holders, e.g. governments, owners,management, technicians

    An inspection framework based on RBI,and formalized through implementation ofRBI and inspection management software,as well as computerized maintenancemanagement system, gives a holistic viewand is a powerful tool, for managementand reporting of asset technical condition

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    12/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 15

    Risk Based InspectionStart

    ScopeDevelopment

    Teamselection

    RBIScreeningworkshop

    Screeningconsequence

    level

    Documents& data for

    RBI

    Level 2 RBIassessment

    Risk level /inspection plan

    OK?

    Risk level /inspection plan

    OK?

    Detailedinspectionplanning

    End

    Significant

    Yes

    Yes

    No

    No

    Insignificant

    Screeningprobabilitylevel

    InsignificantSignificant

    Documents andmechanical

    data

    Correctivemaintenance

    PlannedCorrective

    maintenance

    Upload toCMMS &

    CIMS

    oo Integrity / inspection philosophyo risk matrix definition o

    Estimate PoF & CoFaccording to risk matrixdefinition

    Reviewengineering of

    item

    Screeningprobabilitylevel

    Significant Insignificant

    Monitor forPoF drivers

    PoFassessment

    CoFassessment

    Level 3 RBI assessment

    RBI work process: Scope development,agreement of procedures and teamdefinition

    Scope in detail: Items to be included, as

    well as detailed deliverables RBI Team to include correct competence

    and experience:

    Project management

    Risk Based Inspection

    Materials and corrosion

    Safety risk analysis

    Process and operation of the plant

    NDT and inspection planning

    Field inspectionMaintenance

    CMMS and database management

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    13/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 16

    Risk Based InspectionStart

    ScopeDevelopment

    Teamselection

    RBIScreeningworkshop

    Screeningconsequence

    level

    Documents& data for

    RBI

    Level 2 RBIassessment

    Risk level /inspection plan

    OK?

    Risk level /inspection plan

    OK?

    Detailedinspectionplanning

    End

    Significant

    Yes

    Yes

    No

    No

    Insignificant

    Screeningprobabilitylevel

    InsignificantSignificant

    Documents andmechanical

    data

    Correctivemaintenance

    PlannedCorrective

    maintenance

    Upload toCMMS &

    CIMS

    oo Integrity / inspection philosophyo risk matrix definition o

    Estimate PoF & CoFaccording to risk matrixdefinition

    Reviewengineering of

    item

    Screeningprobabilitylevel

    Significant Insignificant

    Monitor forPoF drivers

    PoFassessment

    CoFassessment

    Level 3 RBI assessment

    RBI work process: Data collection -Documents and mechanical data:

    General data (e.g. system definitions, areadefinitions, material specifications,

    insulation specification, coating codes, riskmatrix, company specific philosophies etc.)

    Equipment specific data (e.g. equipmentdesign parameters for temperature andpressure, dimensions, materials, coatings,insulation, product codes, location etc.)

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    14/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 17

    Risk Based InspectionStart

    ScopeDevelopment

    Teamselection

    RBIScreeningworkshop

    Screeningconsequence

    level

    Documents& data for

    RBI

    Level 2 RBIassessment

    Risk level /inspection plan

    OK?

    Risk level /inspection plan

    OK?

    Detailedinspectionplanning

    End

    Significant

    Yes

    Yes

    No

    No

    Insignificant

    Screeningprobabilitylevel

    InsignificantSignificant

    Documents andmechanical

    data

    Correctivemaintenance

    PlannedCorrective

    maintenance

    Upload toCMMS &

    CIMS

    oo Integrity / inspection philosophyo risk matrix definition o

    Estimate PoF & CoFaccording to risk matrixdefinition

    Reviewengineering of

    item

    Screeningprobabilitylevel

    Significant Insignificant

    Monitor forPoF drivers

    PoFassessment

    CoFassessment

    Level 3 RBI assessment

    Example risk matrices:

    Refer API 581:

    Example - Fit to specific customer:PoF Catup to Cat A B C D E

    1 5 M H H H H

    1,00E-01 4 M M H H H1,00E-02 3 L M M H H1,00E-03 2 L L M M H1,00E-04 1 L L L M M

    CoF Category

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    15/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 18

    Risk Based InspectionStart

    ScopeDevelopment

    Teamselection

    RBIScreeningworkshop

    Screeningconsequence

    level

    Documents& data for

    RBI

    Level 2 RBIassessment

    Risk level /inspection plan

    OK?

    Risk level /inspection plan

    OK?

    Detailedinspectionplanning

    End

    Significant

    Yes

    Yes

    No

    No

    Insignificant

    Screeningprobabilitylevel

    InsignificantSignificant

    Documents andmechanical

    data

    Correctivemaintenance

    PlannedCorrective

    maintenance

    Upload toCMMS &

    CIMS

    oo Integrity / inspection philosophyo risk matrix definition o

    Estimate PoF & CoFaccording to risk matrixdefinition

    Reviewengineering of

    item

    Screeningprobabilitylevel

    Significant Insignificant

    Monitor forPoF drivers

    PoFassessment

    CoFassessment

    Level 3 RBI assessment

    RBI work process: RBI Screening:

    High level evaluation to identify hazardsand assign each equipment tag to anintegrity strategy

    Detailed RBI (sign. PoF and CoF)

    Condition monitoring (insign. PoF, but sign. CoF)

    Planned corrective maintenance(significant PoF, but insignificant CoF)

    Corrective maintenance (insign. PoF and CoF)

    PoF Probability of Failure

    CoF Consequence of Failure

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    16/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 19

    Risk Based InspectionStart

    ScopeDevelopment

    Teamselection

    RBIScreeningworkshop

    Screeningconsequence

    level

    Documents& data for

    RBI

    Level 2 RBIassessment

    Risk level /inspection plan

    OK?

    Risk level /inspection plan

    OK?

    Detailedinspectionplanning

    End

    Significant

    Yes

    Yes

    No

    No

    Insignificant

    Screeningprobabilitylevel

    InsignificantSignificant

    Documents andmechanical

    data

    Correctivemaintenance

    PlannedCorrective

    maintenance

    Upload toCMMS &

    CIMS

    oo Integrity / inspection philosophyo risk matrix definition o

    Estimate PoF & CoFaccording to risk matrixdefinition

    Reviewengineering of

    item

    Screeningprobabilitylevel

    Significant Insignificant

    Monitor forPoF drivers

    PoFassessment

    CoFassessment

    Level 3 RBI assessment

    RBI work process: Detailed RBI / level 2

    Semi-quantitative RBI analysis. Level ofquantification to be agreed with customer

    Assessments performed on equipment /

    corrosion circuit using available information,e.g. actual process conditions, operationalhistory, inspection history and findings

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    17/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 20

    Risk Based InspectionStart

    ScopeDevelopment

    Teamselection

    RBIScreeningworkshop

    Screeningconsequence

    level

    Documents& data for

    RBI

    Level 2 RBIassessment

    Risk level /inspection plan

    OK?

    Risk level /inspection plan

    OK?

    Detailedinspectionplanning

    End

    Significant

    Yes

    Yes

    No

    No

    Insignificant

    Screeningprobabilitylevel

    InsignificantSignificant

    Documents andmechanical

    data

    Correctivemaintenance

    PlannedCorrective

    maintenance

    Upload toCMMS &

    CIMS

    oo Integrity / inspection philosophyo risk matrix definition o

    Estimate PoF & CoFaccording to risk matrixdefinition

    Reviewengineering of

    item

    Screeningprobabilitylevel

    Significant Insignificant

    Monitor forPoF drivers

    PoFassessment

    CoFassessment

    Level 3 RBI assessment

    RBI work process: Level 3 RBIassessment

    Where the detailed RBI indicatesunacceptably high risk or unacceptably

    frequent inspection, a detailed study of therisk drivers is carried out

    Recommendation of mitigating actions,e.g. equipment modifications, processchanges, operational changes

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    18/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 21

    Risk Based InspectionStart

    ScopeDevelopment

    Teamselection

    RBIScreeningworkshop

    Screeningconsequence

    level

    Documents& data for

    RBI

    Level 2 RBIassessment

    Risk level /inspection plan

    OK?

    Risk level /inspection plan

    OK?

    Detailedinspectionplanning

    End

    Significant

    Yes

    Yes

    No

    No

    Insignificant

    Screeningprobability

    levelInsignificantSignificant

    Documents andmechanical

    data

    Correctivemaintenance

    PlannedCorrective

    maintenance

    Upload toCMMS &

    CIMS

    oo Integrity / inspection philosophyo risk matrix definition o

    Estimate PoF & CoFaccording to risk matrixdefinition

    Reviewengineering of

    item

    Screeningprobability

    levelSignificant Insignificant

    Monitor forPoF drivers

    PoFassessment

    CoFassessment

    Level 3 RBI assessment

    RBI work process: Inspection planning andimplementation in CMMS

    Detailed inspection planning providing detailson inspection intervals and time forinspection, inspection method, areas forinspection (including inspection drawings),how it shall be reported etc.

    Inspection activities should be plannedtogether with other maintenance activitieswhere these have dependencies

    Required procedures and work taskdescriptions

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    19/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 22

    Risk Based InspectionStart

    ScopeDevelopment

    Teamselection

    RBIScreeningworkshop

    Screeningconsequence

    level

    Documents& data for

    RBI

    Level 2 RBIassessment

    Risk level /inspection plan

    OK?

    Risk level /inspection plan

    OK?

    Detailedinspectionplanning

    End

    Significant

    Yes

    Yes

    No

    No

    Insignificant

    Screeningprobability

    levelInsignificantSignificant

    Documents andmechanical

    data

    Correctivemaintenance

    PlannedCorrective

    maintenance

    Upload toCMMS &

    CIMS

    oo Integrity / inspection philosophyo risk matrix definition o

    Estimate PoF & CoFaccording to risk matrixdefinition

    Reviewengineering of

    item

    Screeningprobability

    levelSignificant Insignificant

    Monitor forPoF drivers

    PoFassessment

    CoFassessment

    Level 3 RBI assessment

    RBI work process: Condition monitoringprogram

    Establish integrity operating envelopes inorder to verify validity of RBI analysis andcheck PoF drivers against pre-defined limits

    Define monitoring parameters on instrumenttag level / test points etc.

    Monitoring to be focused on significantinfluence factors, e.g:

    Corrosion / erosion probes; e.g. erosion

    coupons, corrosion coupons, bacteriacoupons

    Vibrations / stress monitoring

    Process parameters; e.g. pressure,temperature, velocity, pH, oxygencontent, fluid conductivity, CO 2, H2S etc.

    Performance parameters; e.g. heattransfer, pressure drop, chemicalinjection pump availability

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    20/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 23Slide 23

    Cost-benefits of process- and condition monitoring forstatic mechanical process equipment: a case study It is recognized that heat recovery units (HRSG) systems have

    experienced significant problems due to leaks from water / steampiping and heat exchangers. Main degradation mechanism have been stress corrosion cracking

    and corrosion fatigue in stainless steel pipes (SS316 / SS321) andflow assisted corrosion in carbon steel pipes.

    Date Month 2011 Slide 23

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    21/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 24Slide 24

    Cost-benefits of process- and condition monitoring forstatic mechanical process equipment: a case study (cont) It has been recognized that monitoring of significant influence

    factors (conductivity, pH, oxygen content, nitrite content) andacting on out of spec parameters could have prevented leaks Leaks and shutdown of steam loops implicates that electricity has

    to be generated from gas driven generator Calculations from one installation offshore Norway indicates an

    extra cost of $ 13-17 mill per year due to lost heat generation, aswell as $ 35-50 mill in modification costs

    Date Month 2011 Slide 24

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    22/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 25

    Content

    Aker Solutions in brief Who we are and what we do Risk Based Inspection Dynamic optimisation of inspection plans / integrated planning Non-Intrusive Inspection a significant contribution to optimisation

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    23/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker Slide 26

    CMMS

    Strategise

    FMECASRCMRAMSLCCMTTFPFCRLSparesFailure Analysis

    RBI RCM

    AMST

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    24/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker Slide 27

    CMMS

    Monitor Static Equipment

    Inspector

    InspectionsUltrasonicsRadiographyStrainVisualVibration

    AcousticsCorrosionProcess

    FMECASRCMRAMSLCCMTTFPFCRLSparesFailure Analysis

    Exceptions

    DesicionSupport

    RBI RCM AMST

    Inspector S-ProI.S. Data Collector

    CMDM 5660

    Infrared Camera

    Ultrasonics

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    25/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker Slide 28

    CMMS

    Monitor Rotating

    Analyst

    VibrationLube OilPerformanceStrainElectricalBalance

    AlignmentBearing Inspection

    FMECASRCMRAMSLCCMTTFPFCRLSparesFailure Analysis

    RBI RCM AMST

    Exceptions

    DesicionSupport Protection

    On-line

    Off-line

    Wireless

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    26/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker Slide 29

    Reporting

    Exceptions

    DesicionSupport

    Static Rotating

    Results Reporter

    Client Meeting RCARCFA

    Exceptions

    DesicionSupport

    OPC OPC

    CMMS

    Planning Board

    Planning

    DashboardDCS SCADA

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    27/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker Slide 30

    Integrasjon Router

    Dashboard

    OPC OPC

    DCS(distributed controls system)

    To @

    Pi

    SCADA(supervisory control and data acquisition)

    To @

    Smart Signal

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    28/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker Slide 31

    Inspector S-ProI.S. Data Collector

    CMDM 5660

    Protection

    On-line

    Off-line

    CMMS AnalystInspector

    VibrationLube OilPerformanceStrainElectricalBalance

    AlignmentBearing Inspection

    FMECASRCMRAMSLCCMTTFPFCRLSparesFailure Analysis

    Exceptions

    DesicionSupport

    Static Rotating

    Results Reporter

    RCFA RCAClient Meeting

    Planning Board

    RBI RCM

    AMST

    Integration Router

    Exceptions

    DesicionSupport

    Dashboard

    OPC OPC

    Wireless

    SCADA(supervisory control and data acquisition)

    Smart Signal

    DCS(distributed controls system)

    Pi

    Infrared

    Ultrasonics

    Eddy Current Inspectionof tube stack

    InspectionsUltrasonicsRadiographyStrainVisualVibration

    AcousticsCorrosionProcessThermography

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    29/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 32

    Content

    Aker Solutions in brief Who we are and what we do

    Risk Based Inspection Dynamic optimisation of inspection plans / integrated planning Non-Intrusive Inspection a significant contribution to optimisation

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    30/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 33Slide 33

    Non-Intrusive inspection (NII) Where the RBI identifies internal degradation mechanisms which can be

    followed up through periodic inspection, it should be evaluated whether

    inspection can be performed non-intrusively Non-Intrusive Inspection means inspection from outside, without breaking

    the integrity. Performed during production (or during shut down) Assessment can be performed in accordance with DNV RP-G103, Non-

    Intrusive Inspection AkerSolutions have developed a NII screening methodology considering

    Technical issues (design / construction data, inspection history etc) HSE issues Business issues (cost benefit evaluations)

    Why NII? Reduce need for entering of confined space (safety of personnel) Increase production availability More flexibility in planning of shut down work

    NII assessment capabilities will be implemented in AkerSolutions RBI andinspection management software

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    31/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 34Slide 34

    Cost-benefits of Non-Intrusive Inspection: a case study

    Date Month 2011 Slide 34

    ::.

    Item Electrostatic coalescer, tag No. XXXX-VJ20001A

    Presumptions

    andexperience

    Entering tank for IVI will be done outside revision stop, while

    producing through parallel coalescer In order to secure acceptable water in oil content, the

    production is reduced by 3-5000 barrels per day for about 20days

    Evaluation IVI implicates an accumulated deferred production of $ 5-10

    mill while NII does not affect the production The inspection cost for IVI and NII is about the same ($ 0.22

    vs. 0.18 mill) Manpower required for IVI and NII is about the same (4 vs. 5

    persons, about 20 days) The risk related to entering the tank is significant wrt.

    personnel, and redundancy is lost while performing IVI. Riskrelated to NII is low

    Conclusion There is a potential for significant savings, both in terms of riskand production, by implementing NII

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    32/33

    2011 Aker Solutions part of Aker February 2011 Slide 35Slide 35

    Risk Based InspectionDynamic optimisation of inspection plans

    Extend service life and verify safe operation of an assetby a combination of analysis, monitoring and inspection

    A systematic use of available process- and conditionmonitoring data, available technology and Non-IntrusiveInspection in order to give better production availabilitywhile securing acceptable risk

    Use integrated planning as a tool to dynamically optimisemaintenance- and inspection plans

  • 8/9/2019 O_Bjaanes

    33/33

    2011 Ak S l ti t f AkF b 2011 Slid 36

    CopyrightCopyright of all published material including photographs, drawings and images in this document remains vested in

    Aker Solutions and third party contributors as appropriate. Accordingly, neither the whole nor any part of this documentshall be reproduced in any form nor used in any manner without express prior permission and applicableacknowledgements. No trademark, copyright or other notice shall be altered or removed from any reproduction.

    Disclaimer This Presentation includes and is based, inter alia, on forward-looking information and statements that are subject torisks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ. These statements and this Presentation are based oncurrent expectations, estimates and projections about global economic conditions, the economic conditions of theregions and industries that are major markets for Aker Solutions ASA and Aker Solutions ASAs (including subsidiariesand affiliates) lines of business. These expectations, estimates and projections are generally identifiable by statementscontaining words such as expects, believes, estimates or similar expressions. Important factors that could causeactual results to differ materially from those expectations include, among others, economic and market conditions inthe geographic areas and industries that are or will be major markets for Aker Solutions businesses, oil prices, marketacceptance of new products and services, changes in governmental regulations, interest rates, fluctuations in currencyexchange rates and such other factors as may be discussed from time to time in the Presentation. Although AkerSolutions ASA believes that its expectations and the Presentation are based upon reasonable assumptions, it can giveno assurance that those expectations will be achieved or that the actual results will be as set out in the Presentation.

    Aker Solutions ASA is making no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability orcompleteness of the Presentation, and neither Aker Solutions ASA nor any of its directors, officers or employees will

    have any liability to you or any other persons resulting from your use. Aker Solutions consists of many legally independent entities, constituting their own separate identities. Aker Solutionsis used as the common brand or trade mark for most of these entities. In this presentation we may sometimes useAker Solutions, we or us when we refer to Aker Solutions companies in general or where no useful purpose isserved by identifying any particular Aker Solutions company.