Oasis Fire Pipeline Oasis Fire Pipeline Spring 2011 Spring 2011 Soil and Vegetation Soil and Vegetation effects of Oasis Wildfire effects of Oasis Wildfire followed by drought followed by drought Alfredo Muñoz Rangeland Management Specialist Natural Resources Conservation Service
35
Embed
Oasis Fire Pipeline Spring 2011 Soil and Vegetation effects of Oasis Wildfire followed by drought Alfredo Muñoz Rangeland Management Specialist Natural.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Oasis Fire PipelineOasis Fire PipelineSpring 2011Spring 2011
Soil and Vegetation effects of Soil and Vegetation effects of Oasis Wildfire followed by Oasis Wildfire followed by
droughtdrought
Alfredo MuñozRangeland Management Specialist
Natural Resources Conservation Service
How to stop it?
Extreme climatic conditions, especially low RH%
What we were left with.
Misleading InformationMisleading Information
““The effects of wildfires are similar to the effects The effects of wildfires are similar to the effects of prescribed burning”of prescribed burning”
““Fire never causes the death of grass plants”Fire never causes the death of grass plants”
““Fire is natural, therefore these wildfires should Fire is natural, therefore these wildfires should not be viewed as such a bad thing”not be viewed as such a bad thing”
How Much Grass Has Died?How Much Grass Has Died?How Much Grass Has How Much Grass Has
Survived?Survived?
The Biggest The Biggest Question:Question:
Charred grass stump
Dr. Henry Wright
Prescribed Burning and Wildfire are Prescribed Burning and Wildfire are Completely DifferentCompletely Different
Grass Response to FireGrass Response to Fire((Fire EcologyFire Ecology; Wright and ; Wright and
Bailey)Bailey)
• Most species of short grass are harmed by Most species of short grass are harmed by fire during a dry year.fire during a dry year.
• Following a spring wildfire, when soil was Following a spring wildfire, when soil was dry, recovery took three growing seasons.dry, recovery took three growing seasons.
• Recovery was 35%, 62% and 97% Recovery was 35%, 62% and 97% following the 1following the 1stst, 2, 2ndnd and 3 and 3rdrd growing growing seasons.seasons.
• The rhizomatous form of sideoats is almost The rhizomatous form of sideoats is almost always reduced 40% to 50% by fire during always reduced 40% to 50% by fire during dry years and may require three years for dry years and may require three years for full recovery.full recovery.
• It tolerates fire reasonably well during It tolerates fire reasonably well during exceptionally wet years with no significant exceptionally wet years with no significant reduction in yield.reduction in yield.
• As long as soil moisture is adequate, vine-As long as soil moisture is adequate, vine-mesquite, Arizona cottontop, plains mesquite, Arizona cottontop, plains bristlegrass, Texas cupgrass, bunchgrass bristlegrass, Texas cupgrass, bunchgrass sideoats and meadow dropseed thrive after sideoats and meadow dropseed thrive after fire.fire.
Grass Response (Wright and Grass Response (Wright and Bailey)Bailey)
Grass Response (Wright and Grass Response (Wright and Bailey)Bailey)
• Texas wintergrass is severely harmed by Texas wintergrass is severely harmed by sweeping hot fires but increases following sweeping hot fires but increases following creeping cool fires.creeping cool fires.
• Fire will cause little bluestem to decrease as Fire will cause little bluestem to decrease as much as 58% during dry years or increase as much as 58% during dry years or increase as much as 81% during wet years.much as 81% during wet years.
• Tobosagrass is severely harmed by burning Tobosagrass is severely harmed by burning during dry years but will recover fully by the during dry years but will recover fully by the end of the third growing season.end of the third growing season.
• If the soil is moist at time of burning, If the soil is moist at time of burning, tobosagrass yield is two or three times higher tobosagrass yield is two or three times higher than unburned areas.than unburned areas.
• Following wildfire in a dry year, the cover Following wildfire in a dry year, the cover and yield of following grasses were and yield of following grasses were reduced: big bluestem, little bluestem, reduced: big bluestem, little bluestem, hairy grama, sideoats grama, hairy grama, sideoats grama, buffalograss, blue grama. buffalograss, blue grama.
• Bush muhly and black grama is seriously Bush muhly and black grama is seriously harmed by fire, especially in dry yearsharmed by fire, especially in dry years
Grass Response (Wright and Grass Response (Wright and Bailey)Bailey)
It all depends on rainfallIt all depends on rainfall
Perennial grasses survival ranged from 0 to 28% in some areas
The Biggest Risk:The Biggest Risk:Soil ErosionSoil Erosion
Edwards Plateau Wildfire:Edwards Plateau Wildfire:7 – 10 Tons per acre7 – 10 Tons per acre over 2.5 year Periodover 2.5 year Period
Power and energy of a single raindrop.
Soil Erosion after significant Rainfall
Bottom of hills
Erosion since fire
Grass Impacts – East Amarillo Complex Grass Impacts – East Amarillo Complex FireFire
March 2006; 888,000 Acres March 2006; 888,000 Acres((Rangeland Ecology and MgtRangeland Ecology and Mgt; Jan. 2011); Jan. 2011)
11 Ranches; 3 Counties11 Ranches; 3 Counties
Bad News / Good NewsBad News / Good News
Bad News:Bad News:•Grass mortality was 7x higher on burned sites Grass mortality was 7x higher on burned sites in fall 2006 for short grass sites (primarily in fall 2006 for short grass sites (primarily blue grama and buffalograss)blue grama and buffalograss)•Grass mortality was 4x higher on burned sites Grass mortality was 4x higher on burned sites in fall 2006 for mid grass sites (primarily in fall 2006 for mid grass sites (primarily sideoats grama, little bluestem, sand sideoats grama, little bluestem, sand dropseed)dropseed)
Grass Impacts – East Amarillo Complex Grass Impacts – East Amarillo Complex FireFire
Good News:Good News:•Grass productivity was not harmed by the Grass productivity was not harmed by the wildfire in 2006, 2007 or 2008.wildfire in 2006, 2007 or 2008.•Fewer living grass plants provided increased Fewer living grass plants provided increased compensatory growth.compensatory growth.•Grass density increased by the end of 2008 Grass density increased by the end of 2008 but was still measurably lower than non-but was still measurably lower than non-burned areas. burned areas.
Context:Context:•Rainfall for first 6 months after fire = Rainfall for first 6 months after fire = 15”15”•Rainfall for three years following the Rainfall for three years following the fire was average to above average.fire was average to above average.•Fire was primarily a grassland fire not Fire was primarily a grassland fire not a juniper firea juniper fire
Grass Impacts – East Amarillo Complex Grass Impacts – East Amarillo Complex FireFire
Monitoring Grass Monitoring Grass Mortality on Wildcat FireMortality on Wildcat Fire
Shallow Sites: 72% DeadLow Stony Hill Sites: 91% DeadSteep Rocky Sites: 100% Dead
Monitoring Grass / Forb Monitoring Grass / Forb Seedlings on Wildcat FireSeedlings on Wildcat Fire
Large mature trees; are they Large mature trees; are they dead?dead?
• Make no mistake, these fires not only Make no mistake, these fires not only present some heartburn over potential present some heartburn over potential impact to wildlife and wildlife habitat, it impact to wildlife and wildlife habitat, it also sends a lot of business up in smoke as also sends a lot of business up in smoke as well. well.
• The whitetail hunting business has been in The whitetail hunting business has been in a tailspin over the last few years. These a tailspin over the last few years. These fires certainly do not help the cause at all. fires certainly do not help the cause at all.
• We recently cancelled all hunts that we We recently cancelled all hunts that we had booked on two ranches.had booked on two ranches.
Comments from Wildcat FireComments from Wildcat FireTom Green and Coke Co, April Tom Green and Coke Co, April
20112011
Comments from Wildcat FireComments from Wildcat Fire
Worst Losses---Worst Losses---
Grand live oak trees, native pecans, Grand live oak trees, native pecans, lots of grass (feed), fences and deer lots of grass (feed), fences and deer stands. stands.
Best Losses---Best Losses---
Raccoons, porcupines, skunks, and Raccoons, porcupines, skunks, and hopefully anything else that eats a quail hopefully anything else that eats a quail as well as dead brush from previous as well as dead brush from previous years grubbing and maybe even some years grubbing and maybe even some of the fences.of the fences.
No doubt, over the past 500 years, our range land in No doubt, over the past 500 years, our range land in West Texas has suffered similar fires. So the West Texas has suffered similar fires. So the
eventual recovery is assured . . . . eventual recovery is assured . . . .
but will any of us live to see it?but will any of us live to see it?
Comments from Wildcat FireComments from Wildcat Fire65 Year Old Rancher:65 Year Old Rancher:
On the Positive Side:On the Positive Side:Greatly reduced pricklypear cover; tasajillo controlGreatly reduced pricklypear cover; tasajillo control
Greatly reduced cedar coverGreatly reduced cedar cover
Control of blueberry cedarControl of blueberry cedar
Control of young redberry cedarControl of young redberry cedar