o. … · MINUTE ITEM This Calendar Item NG,..: .J;> A v was apQroved as Minute Item No. M ,fO> by the State Lands Commission by a vote of 92 - to __tL..at its s)/,$14'«- meeting.

MINUTE ITEM This Calendar Item NG,..: .J;>

A was apQroved as Minute Item v No. M ,fO> by the State Lands

Commission by a vote of 92 -to __tL.. at its s)/,$14'«-meeting.

CALENDAR ITEM

32

2/25/82 SA 5639 Childress

SALE OF STATE SCHOOL LAND

A

APPLICANT: Shasta Dam Arca Public Utility District

1650 Stanton Drive P. o. Box 777 Central Valley, California 96019

AREA, TYPE LAND AND LOCATION: 25.17 acres, more or less, of State school

LAND USE:

BACKGROUND:

AB 884·:

land at Summit City, Shasta County.

Vacant and unimproved.

In June 1980, the Commission a9quired title to about 160 acres within Summit City, Shasta County, in exchange for 480 acres of State school lands within the Joshua Tree National Monument. The Shasta Dam

· Area Public Utility District, being aware of the propo9ed exchange, has since 1977, indicated an interest in acquiring 25 acres for development into a community park.

On August 25, 1981, the State Lands Commission received a purchase application covering Lhe 25 acres located in the NE~ of Section 26, T33N, RSW, MDM. The applicant, by letter received January 20, 1982, formally offered $100,000 for the 25.17; The fair market value established by staff appraisal.

A staff review shows that the land is not suitable for cultivation without artificial irrigation and therefore may be sold under the rules and regulations and a~ a price fixed by the Commission.

8/24/82.

OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION: 1. A n~gative declaration and amended

75

negative declaration were prepared by staff of the Commission pursuant

190 -1-s 3P.

CALE~IOAR PAGE

MINUTI: P.'i.GE 496 .. _:.

: 3 .diSJJ:,,.._. __ ... ~ .. ==::::::>::=::=::::::::

EXHIBITS:

CALENDAR :. £EM NO . 3 2 ( CONTD ) "'

to CEQA and the State EIR Guidelines,. The Commission staff review indicated that the project will not have a sign~Eicant effect on the environment.

2. In compliance with Section 6373 of the P.R.C., a General Plan has been prepared and filed.

A. Land Description. B. Location Map. C. Negative Decl~ration. D. Ame~ded Negative Declaration. E. General Plan.

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE COMMISSION:

1. DETERMINE THAT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND AMENDED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT BY THE COMMISSION AFTER CONSULTATION WITH RESPONSIBLE AND TRUSTEE AGENCIES.

2. CERTIFY THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 287 HAVE BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORuANCE WITH CEQA, THE STATE EIR GUIDELINES AND THE COMMI$SION'S ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS, AND THAT THE COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED THE INFORMATION CONTAINED THEREIN TOGETHER WITH COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING THE REVIEW PROCESS.

3. DETERMINE THAT THE PROJECT WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ~NVIRONMENT.

4. FIND THAT A GENERAL PLAN FOR THE USE OF THE SUBJECT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY THE COMMISSION'S STAFF AND FILED WITH THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE AND THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO P.R.C. 6373.

S. FIND THAT THE STATE SCHOOL LAND DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO IS NOT SUITABLE FOR CULTIVATION WITHOUT ARTIFICIAL IRRIGATION.

6. AUTHORIZE THE SALE, WITHOUT ADVERTISING, OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERE'LO AND BY REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF TO THE SHASTA DAM AREA PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT; SUBJECT TO ALL STATUTORY AND CONSTITUTIONAL RESERVATIONS, INCLUDING RESERVATION OF ALL GEOTHERMAL AND MINERAL RESOURCES, FOR Ql00,000 CASH.

-2- {;AC!NDA;;::aE , ~

9971--

MINUTe Pl\GE --.;._...;.._-..... ..-.-- ...-------

EXHIBIT "A II

LAND DESCRIPTION SA 5639

A parcel of land in the SW-1/4 of the NE-1/4 of Section 26, T33N, RSW, MOM, Shasta County, California, said parcel being a portion of Parcel 1 described in that certain de~d recorded in Book 1721 of Official Records, page 11, Shasta Count)r Records, being more particularly described as follows:

BEGINNING from an iron pin (R.E. #4603) marking the center of Sect'lon 26; thence N 0° 04 1 58 11 E 1, 172. 29 feet to the center of State Highway Route 151; thence along centerline of said highway S 75° 20 1 35" E 387.92 feet; th1:nce along a curve to the left with a radius of 2,000 feet, through a central angle of 13° 22 1 45 11 for an arc distance cf 467.02 feet; thence S 88° 43 1 20 11 E 336.76 feet to the intersection of the centerline of Sacramento Street extended; thenc~ S 3° 50' 11" W 986.13 feet to a point on the southerly line of the NE-1/4 of Section 26; thence S 89° 03 1 54" W 1,109.37 feet along Rose Avenue, to the point of beginning.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM the southerly 40 feet of the State highway conveyed to the State of California by quitclaim deed recorded July 23~ i971, in Book 1077 of Official Records> page 124J Shasta County Records.

ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM the westerly 30 feet o~ Sacramento Street and the 20··foot strip along Rose Avenue conveyed to the County of Shasta by quitclaim det~d recorded August 9, 1971, in Book 1079 of Offi.cial Records, at page 84, Shasta County Records.

END OF DESCRIPTION

PREPAREP FEBRUARY 9, 1982 BY TECHNICAL SERVICES UNIT, ROY MINNICK, SUPERVISOR.

CALEND.l\R PAQ!::

MINUTE PAG\E

r-! t-

" CALENDAR PAG5

MINUTE PAGE

ll1'AT! Of CAllfORf-.llA EDMUND O. IROWH JR., Gov.mu $ii;-7*i %StT7CTFtt

STATE LANDS COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICE

A KENNETH CORY, Controll~t 9 Ml KE CURB, l.l11utertanr Gov1rnor

MARY ANN GRAVES. Director of Flnanct

Project Title:

Project location:

1807 • 13th StrHt Sacram1nto, Callfomla 95814

WILLIAM F. NORTHROP Extcutiv1 OHICl'r

EIR ND: 287

File Ref.: SA 5639

SCH No.:

Shasta Dam Public Utility District -

Portion of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4, s~clion 26, T.33N, R.SW, MDB & M, Shasta County

Project Description: Lease 22 1/ 2 acres of State-owned land for th1:; development of a public park.

This NmATIVE DECLARATION is prep1ared pursuant to the requireme11ts of the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 21000 et. seq. of the Public Resources Code), the State EIR Guidelines (Section 15000 et. seq. 1 Title 14

1 of the California Administrative Code} 1 and the State Lands Commission regula­tions (Section 2901 et. seq. 1 Title 21 of the California Auministrative Code).

Based upon the attached Initial Study, it hs.s been found that:

[!)i the project will not have a sie~ificant effect on the environment.

LI t'ht:o attach~d mitigation measures will avoia :-'otent1allJ s1gn1f1-:.ant effe-.:ts.

Contact Person: Ted T. Fukushima 1807 - 13th Street Sacramento, California 95814 (916) 322-7813

CALENDAR PAGE

Mll~UTE PAGE

184 .50.0

=====-=·· =• ~. -=~'=-·"'""'-----=---=-=-==---==---""""'"""""....,..,,.";E;,;DM;,;;U~ND G. BROWN JR., Ciovir"or , ~TAU OF C:ALlfORNIA-STAt! lANOS COMMISSIUM

STATE LANDS GOMMl!;SIO~ '"" ,,.-====: ===~=· · 1807 titH ~TR~lf

.CIAMENT0, CA\lfOINIA ''"' ,'

September +, 1981

Fi'.~.e: \tl210~P.

To Whom It May .Concern:

Enclo~ec is a copy of a Ne8ative. Declaration and I~itial Study for a proposeJ public par~ in Su~mit City, Shasta County, Califcrnia.

Please review these documen\te and send any cor.tments you may ha.va no later than October 1, lt')Rl. Thank yo~ for yo\\r cooperaticm.

~// SMn rely,./

ui,;f~A. DAN COit:.N Environmental Sp;tcialist (916) 322-7805

Enclosure

<.:AL!:NDAn ?Aile 195 501

STAT:E ~M.JDS COMMISSl!)N

INIT!t\t STUDY CHECKLIST w 21048 File Ref.:---------------

e. BACKGROUND U\IFORMATION

A. Applicant. ____l~hasta_ Dam Area Public Utility_District 1650 Stanton Drive, Post Office Box 777

-· Central Vallev.. California 96019

B. Chtcklist Date: ~. 8 I 26 I 81 . C. Contac~ Person:_ Ted ~. Fukushima

Telephcne-:, ( 9161 322-7813 o. Purpose: Establishment of Public Park

e. Location:. Portion of the SZ i/4 or t:he NE 1i4, Section 26, T.33N, R.Sw.

~~UB & Mi Shasta Count~ f Description: (See Supplement A}

G.

~··----------------------------------

sons· Ccmtacted. Bill Di-yer. California Arc~aeological Site Survev, C~. Chico;. Leo Pyshora, Associate Wil.dlife Biologist~

~-------~~D_e~p_a_r_tm~en __ t_o __ f_F_i_··s_h __ a_n_d __ G_am~e_ .. __ R_e~g~i __ .o_n __ I_; __ D_o_n_a_l_d __ D_.~-----­Chamberlin., Civil Engineer, Shasta Dam Public Utility District

ll. ENVIRONMENT AL IMPAC1'S. (Explain all "yes" and ''maybe" answers}

A. YH Maybe No

£allh, Will the proposai result in: D []

D D 0 0

1. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in g1Jologic sub3trur.tures? .•..••.•• , •••• , •

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Disruptions, duplacements, compaction, ''r overcovoring of the soil?, • , •..• , ••..•••

Change in topography or ground s1.1rface relief fe;:iturfls? •••.•••••••••••••••••••

The desnuc:hon, covering, 01 modif1c.at1on of .my un1'1UO 9eolog1G ..,, phy$ical features~ .•

0 D

Any increase in wind or water eroS1on of sous, either on or off the site? .....• , • . 07,---Il~fs:-­Changes m depos1t1on or erosion of beach silnds, or changes m s1lt<1t.on, dopos1t1 ~A~f'.NOAR PAGE ~f-2; erosion ~h1t.h m.ly modify tho channel of d 11ver or meam ur the bud of the oc iRfJTE r'A e '. . any bay, mlot, or lake? .•.••..••.•.••.••••.•• , . , •• , , •• , •• , . , •• , ......,....._ _ __,,,,_,,___.

B. Aln Will the proposal result in: a. ··substantial 111r emmiss1ons W deterioration of arnbient air quality? ................ .

9. The t:Gation of obiuct1on~ble odorsf. ..•••• , •••..•••••••.••• , •••••••....

10. Alteration of air movem1ent, moisture or temperature, or any .~hangc in climate, eith<ir locanv or regioniJll'f,7 . • . , ...•.•.•••••••••••••••••.•• <t ••••••••••••

C. Wattr. Will the propC1sal tesult in: 11. Cht..nlf:S in the current·~. or the cours6· or dir11ction of water m.ove1T1ents, in either marine

or fresh \VZters? • •••••••••• , ~ •••••••• , ..................... - ••.•...

12. Changes in absorptior1 r(!tes, draint\ge patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? .•.. I ti • I ••••• I I •••••••••••• ' •••••••• I •• I I I •••••• I • I ••• I

13. Alterations to the co~1rse or flow of 11ood IJ!1aters? •••.•••••••••• , •••••••.••..

~4. Cha!lge in the amoun11 ont1rr~Cfl water in 11nY water body? ••••••••••.••••••••.•

'15. Discharge into surfac:e woters, ();, in anv alteration of surface water quality, including but.not limited to ten\perature:, dissolved·oxygen or turbiditV? . . ..•.•...•.••.•.

16. Alteratio11.JJi the diret1tion or rate of flow of ground waters? .•..•.•.•....••••.••

17. Ch.~{;(! in the quantirV of ground wat11rs, either through direct addit1or1s or withdrawals, ,, • ·mrough intercf!!)tio11 0(1Jn aquifer by cuts or excavations? • . . • . • • . .•.•••••••

19. Substantial reduction in the amour'1t of water otherwise available for pu.blic water , supplies? ................. : ...................................... .

19. Exposure of people or ~\ropertv t<I w1~ter relateci hazar~ ~uch as flooding or tidal waves? .

O. Plant·Lij'e. Will the proposal·result .n: 20. Change in the diversity of specie:.1, or number of any species of plants (including trees,

shrubs, gr~ss, crops, and·aquatic p·lantsl? •.•.••.••.•••••••••••••••.•••••••

21. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? .•••..•.

22. Introduction of l~~w species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replen· ishment of existing specil\s7 •••.•.••.•.••••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••

23. Reduction in acreage of :iny agricultural crop? ••.•••••••••.••••••••••••••••

E. Animal Life. Will the proposal1rl!$ult in: 24. Change in the diversit'{ of speci~s. or numbe~ of any species of animals (birds, land

animals including reptihis. fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, or insects)? ..•..•••.•

25. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangerod ~pecies of animals? ••.•.•.

26. Introduction of new spec•es of animals into an area, or 'esult in a barrier to the migration or movemen~ of animals? .•.....•••.••••••••••••••..•.•••• , .•••.....

27. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? •.•••••..••••••••.••.•••••••

F. No,.st. Will the proposal result in: 26. Increase in existing noisr1 levels? •.•.•••••••••••••••• , ••••.•.••••••••• , •

29. Exposure of people to se•1ere noise levels? ••••••••••••••••• , •••••..••• , • , •

G. Li1.ht and Glart. Will the proposal result in: 30. The production of new light or glare? •••••••••••• , , ••••• , , ••••••••••••••

Yes M,.;ybo No

0 0 ® 0 0 [Kl

0 0

D 0 .~

0 0 {!] 0 0 [Kl 0 0 [fil

D D IX1 0 d. 00 0 0 IBl 0 0 [!] 0 0 ~;

IXl 0 0 0 D ®

lKl D 0 D 0. 00

D [[} D D D lXl

0 0 00 0 0 00

[Kl 0 0 0 0 liI

liJ 0 0

H. Land IJst. Will the proposal result in: 31. A substanllJI nlteratton of the present or planned I.ind use of an areal .••• , •. li:i\!.5NDAR PAGJK] 010 •

I. N•turvl Rtwurrts. Willlhe propolDI •esult m: MINUTE PAGE r.;'J" s& 3 32. Increase in th~ rntit of u•.n of any n:itural resources? •••••••••• , •••••••••••• , • • -W

Substantia\'.~pll?t!on of anv nonrcnew:iblo resources? •••. , , • , • , ••••••• , ••• , , , D D

J. ~isk tit' Clp.~t'I. Will the pro1. .i result in:

34. The mvolvunfont of J risk of an explosion or thn roloJse of fl:11ardous substancus-·illl· eluding, hut not lirnitod to. 011, 1>0st1c1dus, chtim1c<1l$, or radiation) 1n the event of an accident or up5nt condl t1ons? • ... , •...... , .•.•.. , ..••.•.••.. , ..• , .... , ..

D D 00 K. Papu/alion. Will the propornl result m:

35. The alteration, qistributton, dtinsitV, or growth rate of the hum~.n population of the D 0 00

0 0 00 area? • .•.•..••.•.•.••..••••.• · . • • · · • • • • • • • • • • • · • • • • • • · • · · · · • · ·

L. 1l11usinl(. Will the proµosal result in: 36. Affecting existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? •..•••.••••••

M. Transpmtatitln/Cimllatltm. Will the proposal result in: 37. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? •••••••••••••.••••••••

38. Affecting existing parking facilities, or create a demand for new parking? ••••••••••••

39. Substan.tial:1mpact upon existing transporatlon systems? •••••••••••••••••••••••

40. Alterations to presant p:itterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? •.••

4 t. Alterations to waterborne, rail, or air traffic? •••••••••.•••••••••••••.••••••

42. Increase iri traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bieycllm. er pi:de:trians? ...•••••.•.••

N. Public Sm•icn. Wiii the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a r.leed for new or altered governmental servica.s in ~ny of the following areas:

43. Fire protection? ....................................... - .......... .

44. Police protection? . . .. . . ...... , .................................. .

45. Schools? ....................................... ,_ .• ~ ........... .

46. Parks and other recreatiooal facilities? ••••• , •••••••••••••••••••...•••.••.

47. Maintenance of public. 1.acilities, including roads? ••••••.••••••••••.•••.••••••

48. Other governmental servi1,es? •.••.•••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

0. Entrg}'. Will the proposal result in: 49, Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? •••••••••••••••••..•••••••••••

50. Subst.intial increa~e in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the develoll· ment of new sources?.. . . . . , ................ , ................. ~ .... .

P. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alteratior.:1 to the following utilities:

51. Power or natural gas? . ................................... , ... , ...... .

52. Communic~tlon svstems? ....... ' ' ....... " ........... I I •••••••• I ••••

53. Water? . .......•..........•.... "" ........... , .................. .

64 Sewer or septic tanks? . . . . . . . . •. , ....•.....•............. , ....... .

55. Stonn water drainage? .....••.•••••••••••••••••.•.••.•••••.•••••.••

56. So'hd wane and disposal? ..•.•.•••.••••••••••••••••••••.•••.•••.••••

a. lluman lfr11/1il. Will the proposal rnsult in: 57. Crea~i'11\ ot any health hili;ard or polont1al health hazard (excluding mental healthl? ••••

~ D D 00 0 D 0 0 ~ 0 0 G1 0 0 ~ 0 [] D

0 D 00 0: [] 0 D 0 00 [&] 0 0 00 D 0 D D IB:l

0 ~ 0 0 D

0 D Efil D 0 [fil

0 0 00 D 0 00 D D r!i 0 D ~

58.

0 Q

Exposurt! of people ta potential hsalth h.iznrd5? ••.••••.•••••••••••••••• ;-;-:-:­CALENDAR PAGE

R. Atsrh~tics. Will the proposal re~ult in: 59. The obstruction of any scenic vista G' view open to the publi~. or will the p•oP ~~TE PAG=r-,

suit in the c1eat1on of dn aesthetically .:i'fens1ve site open to ~ubhc view?. ••.••••••• :----tt::J,.....<t--t.1..+-4--+-

S. P1cr«-ati1m. Wiil thu proposal result in: 60. An impact upon the quality or quanmv of axisting fe~regt1or:al opportunities? •••••••. 00 0 c

T. Archru1'11xical/lli.~1t1ri<'al. IJ\lii. .. re proposal result in: Yn Maybe No

D []] D 61. An alteration of a sign1 ficant arc!leolo91cat or histoncaLs1 tc, structure, ob1ect, or b•.111<11119? ••

U. Mandatory Finrlinxs i>f Sixm]rrfinft.

62. Dees ~he projuct hilvo the potential to degrade th'! quality cf.' th1t env1ro11ment, recLic~ the habitat of a fish or w1l:Jhfe ~pcc11.:s, z::;iuse a ftsh or wildlife poilulat1on to drop b!llow ·salf·~ustainlng 11.!vcls, threaten to ehmmate a plant or ill'rlmill community. reduce the number or restru:t the range of a rare or t1ndangered plant o,r animal or elamrr,(l.re rmpor· tant examples of the ma1ilr period~ ot C12fiforn1a hi$tory of preh1~tory? • , •••••••••••

63. Does the project have the potllntial to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long· term, 'Jnvironmentnl goais? ........ , ..... , .. ., .......................... .

64. Does the p:oject have impacts which are in~ividually limit11d, but cumulatively con-sidorabl~? . . , •.......•..•.•..•..... ; .................. , ......... .

65. Does the project ha>te envi1onmenta:, effects which w1il causa ,,ubstant1a1 adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly~ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

D D [J 0 lKJ

D D lKJ

tJ 0. [XJ Ill. DISCIJSS!ON OF ENVll301'JM!ENTAL EVALUATION

II. A. 2. Construction of parking area, bicycle motocross track, and, possibly, a municipal plunge. Levelling of earth .for playing fie-ids.

D.20. Most exj·~ting sh4'ubbery on the Dite will be removed ~mostly manzanita); some trees will be cut. Department of Fish and Grune advises that no rare plants exist at the site.

D.22. Tu~f and barrier landscaping will be introduced.

E.24. Some animal species may be displaced. Department of Fish and Gathe advises th&t this occurance does not pose a serious problem; no rare or endang,ered species inhabit the project area.

F .28. Public gather~ng an_d competitive sports may cause an increase in noise levels. The f::rea ·residents have lived with a Little League park for many years with no complaintsi there will ·be greenbelt areas on Rose Avenue and Lake Boulevard, which sub­~tantially buffer noise.

G.30. N~ght lighting will be oriented to avoid glare into residential properties; retention of digger pines will h~lp screen pole structures.

H.31. From natural open space to public park (open space/recreational).

(continued on atcached ~heet.) IV. DETERMINATION

On the basis o~ this initial cvaluauon:

[]) I find th~ proposed p101er.t COULD NOT have a s1gn1f1cant titfect ""<he env1rorment, ana a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

D

0

Oete:

I find thai alth.Juqh the proM~cd p1oil'ct could have a significant effect c.11 the environment, there will not be a s.gnrficant effer.t en !Ills ··~,c b1•ca11~u •ru 1rnt1911non "1~1l\1Jr,1• de<cPbed on an at· J ~hl!d •reet ho1ve IJOl!n cJU:.:lcd to the iJIOJCCt. •). NEGATIVE DECLARA T!ON will b" prepared

... / I find •hr pro~,o~rd pro1ect MAV have .- si91,,f,,ant effec.: on the c~v• nm~nt Oci · NVtRe-NMVlTm: rMP;g;9--AE?ORT 1s lllQUUt!d, • . / CALENDAR PMlE I

~ (. (!' sos D c EN NUTE PAGE • -· .,.

!I ! l,....Lll. Environmenta pee a is t For the State Candiccmmisslon

SUPPLEMgN~~

Project Description

The ·project involves the developm~nt of 22 1/2 acres of State-owned land in Shasta County for the constructi~'n of public park facilities.

Immediats construction plans involv~ a BMX (bicycle moto­cross) track on approximately 3 « 5 acres. Track facilities will include a small grandstand, outdoor lighting, restrooms, and a parking area. The BMX facility is to be fenced.

Future expansi'ons for the remainder of the pa1:-cel include several baseball fields, a soccer and rugby field, a genera~-use park with picnic tables and qarbeque facilities, and possible construction of municipal plunge. Plans also include a small Indian museum located in the general-use ?ark area.

The parcel is bordered on the north ~,y Shasta Dam Bu~levard (I-151); on the east by Sacramento Jtreet; on the south by Rose Avenut:!; and on the west by commercia 1 .·structures ar.i.d private residences (beyond Lake Boulevard). B.eyond Shasta Dam BoulevC};t:d is Su:aunit City School and vacant Stal~e-owned land; beyond: Sacramento Street is an existing Littl~ ~eague baseball facility and vacant State-owned land; beyond Rose Avenue are private residences.

The project will involve the removal of some exi.sting trees and vegetation, and ground clearance for recreational facilities.

CALENDAR PAG~ - 200 ' 506 __ .'i

Discussion of ·Environmental Evaluation (cont.)

I.32. S~ort~terrn const~uctian and long-term operational utiliza­tion of water arid power resources will be minimal.

M. 37. Much of 1:he traffic generated will be single-car families and will be disp.~nsed ove.~ the day and .evening. Team events m') prod~ce 50 or more vehicles for players and sp~cta~ors which may pro<luce congestion, especially follow:i,ng games. If the facilities att1rnct sufficient vehicular traff:ic, safety can be irnprov~ld with channeliza­tion, including left turn pockets on Shasta Dam Boulevar4, and signing. To avoid disrU;pt:ions in the residential neighborhood, manned traffic control could direct traffic from games to Shasta Dam Boulevard for distribution.

M.38. A pal:'king area is proposed; capacity as yet undetenni1i.ed.

M.42. Galtrans has plans for parhways on Shasta Dam Boulevard which are primarily for the benefit of the Summit City School children, but whi~h would also provide safety for park users.. Sacramento Drive to the sout!i., antj. Rose Street have very light traffic with concomitant low haza~ds for l?icyclists and pedestrians. Pathways on these C<;).unty streets could be constructed at some future date. if traffic ·"Y'olumes warrant. ·

N.44. wt+~never public gatherings occur, the probability for law enforcement needs increases.

N.46. This park may decrease pressure on other area parks and recreational facilities.

N.47. Maintenance of the park itself.

0.49. Fuel involved in construction activities and electricity for night lighting are the major energy demands.

R.59. Modification from na.tural area to public !)ark with recrea­tional facilitie~. Ample remaining natural areas and lannscaped grounds should offer an aesthetically pleasing area. ·

S.60. Park will augment area's rec'::'eational opportunities.

T. 61. An archaeological record~ search is currently being conducted by C.S.U. Chico. Results pending. Site clear­ance is expecced.

CALENDAR PAGE •

I t (

. ·--"" . ---~- - -· t l H(':l<I~

Exhibit 11 A11

W21048

'lf.ltt dF 'CJ;LlfC!IHIA-~'"fE lANt>S ., MISSION ·-· :..~:::.""~:- .. ~ -,-.. .-.--;: .. -.::..~·.....,,. .. ~ ...... -;y-....-~....-.~===m"""'"=......,......,=-=~ ........ w:=:rr--rr=-v· ;pg"""""-=n"'"""'""'"' ... -"""""----·--="'"==.,.....__......,......_......., .... , .... ....,..__ . ..- . ,1

STATE LANDS COMMJSSiON l80T 13Ttl St,UET s .... c•J~ENTO, C~,l.!fOllNIA 9.581-4

@ Draf ~. AMEN~ NEGATIVE DF.CLARATION EIR ND 287

D Final File Ref. : SA 5639·

SCH fl: 810911314

Project Title: Shasta Qam Public Utility Dis tr.let-Proposed Develo[Jment of ~ecreational Park,

Project Locati~n: Po~tion of the SE~ of the NE~, Section 26, T.33 N,, R.5 w., M,D.M., Shasta Couhty California~

Project Description.: Sale of 25.17 acres, more or less, -:if State-o~~d land for the purpose of dev~loping a recreational park.

Afl·~n.-:ucn t to o!'i.:,,i:>.a.1 Na~.'). ti ve Decl:u•a t:i.o-:. includes: l. ci1an~e fro·.1 11le11se11 to 11!:>:.-tle11 of the .subject parcel. ?· cl:u~"'- ~ fro~:a 22:'. ac:.•e~ to 2;.17 t:!.Cri!c.

This NEGATIVE OECLAMi.:.:.~:: 'is prepared pursu3nt to the requirea~ents of t.he California Environmental Quality Act (Section 21000 et seq of the Public Resoarc~s Code)! the State EIR Guidelines (Section 15000 et seq, Title 14, or the California Administrative Code), a.r.d the State Lands Commission regulatiuns (Section 2901 et seq, Title 2, of the California Administrative Code).

Based upon the attached Initial Studies, it has bean found that:

~ the project will not have a significant e(fcct on the environment.

D the attached mitigntiun me:isure.s ..,ill avoid potentially significant effects.

Cont.ict Person: Ted T. Fukushima 1807-Dth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 l9lo)322-1au

------~------ .. -....--··--..----

CALENDAR PAGE

Form

----~--

GENERAL PLAN

The Shasta Dam Area Public Utility Oistric~ proposes to acquire 25.17 acres of StatP. school lanct for the construction of a public park in the northeast quarter of Section 26, Township 33 North, Range 5 West., MOM, within Summit City, Shasta County.

A negative declaration (SCH #81091814) for the proposed sale by, the State Lanc;ls Commission was prepai·ed and circulated pursuant to the California Environmental· Quality Ac,t (CEQ.t\) and related :·e:;ulations.

Thl's general plan is submitted in conformance with Section 6373 of the Public Resources Code.

CALENOPiR P.'\GE

MINUTE PAGE :) 1 0

,, _ ,, c: