USAID Nutrition Approach: Where are we now? Where are we going? How are we getting there?
Nov 30, 2014
USAID Nutrition Approach: Where are we now? Where are we going? How are we getting there?
Global Health Initiative principles, components and target areas
• HIV/AIDS• Malaria• Tuberculosis• Maternal Health• Child Health• Nutrition• Family Planning and
Reproductive Health• Neglected Tropical
Diseases
Target areas
Implementation components
• Collaborate for impact
• Do more of what works
• Build on and expand existing platforms to foster stronger systems and sustainable results
• Innovate for results
Principles
1. Promote women, girls and
gender equality focus
2. Encourage country
ownership/leadership
3. Strengthen health system
and program sustainability
4. Leverage and strengthen key
multilateral organizations,
global health partnerships
and the private sector
5. Foster strategic coordination
and integration
6. Improve metrics, monitoring
and evaluation
7. Promote research and
innovation 2
3
PRINCIPLES:
1) Invest in country-owned plans that support results-based programs;
2) Strengthen strategic coordination – globally, regionally, and locally;
3) Ensure a comprehensive approach – advancing agriculture-led growth, reducing under-nutrition, and increasing impacts of humanitarian food assistance;
4) Leverage the benefits of multilateral institutions; and
5) Deliver on sustained and accountable commitments.
A Comprehensive ApproachPATHWAYS:Addressing the root causes of hunger that limit the potential of millions of people
Establishing a lasting foundation for change by aligning our resources with country-owned strategies and supporting local capacity.
OBJECTIVES: Inclusive agriculture
sector growth Improve nutritional
status
Cross-cutting priorities: Global research and
innovation Gender Natural resources
and climate consideration
• Bi-lateral planning and program implementation• Coordination with host country• In-country donor coordination
Missions
Regional Bureaus
Global Health Bureau
• Technical support to the field• Global technical leadership• Operations research and innovation• Economies of scale in commodity procurement and highly
specialized expertise• Funding of and representation to international health organizations
• Policy guidance to Missions• Oversight of Mission programs• Regional programs
Food Security Bureau
Role of Operating Units
4
Our goal is to reduce child undernutrition by 30% in focus countries, measured by any one of four core indicators
Underweight (MDG 1c) Stunting Child Anemia Maternal Anemia
GHI/FTF Nutrition Goal
5
Outline
1. Program Context Burden of undernutrition Causes and consequences
2. Recent Sea Change in Nutrition Strategy
3. How the New Nutrition Strategy is implemented globally and in USAID’s programs
4. Review questions Is it feasible to reach our 30% goal? What is the optimal approach for delivering a
comprehensive set of nutrition interventions? How do we overcome the issues related to engaging the
private sector? 6
South Asia has made the most progress Overall number of stunted children in Africa has actually increased
One in three children suffers from stunting
7
19902008
Prevalence of children with stunting, by region
Number of stunted children, 2010
Mali: 82%
Children: 47% prevalence293 million children
Tanzania: 72%
Uganda: 72%
Women of reproductive age:30% prevalence468 million women
Ghana: 59%
Haiti: 48%
Global Burden of Anemia in Children and Women
High global prevalence of anemia in children and women
In some countries, anemia prevalence is significantly higher Any anemia has health and productivity consequences
8
Malawi: 44%
Revised Source: Ruel, SCN News 2008
Determinants of nutrition
NUTRITION
Food/nutrientintake
Health
Access to food Water, sanitation, and health services
9
Maternal and child care practices
Health: contributes to 3.5 million deaths each year from common illnesses otherwise not fatal
Education: lower IQ and school performance
Economic growth: costs countries 3-6% of GDP
Poverty: wages that are half as high in adulthood in children who were undernourished in early life
Infectious disease treatment: hastens HIV progression and reduces adherence to treatment
Improving nutrition is required to achieve all MDGs
10
Outline
1. Program Context Burden of undernutrition Causes and consequences
2. Recent Sea Change in Nutrition Strategy
3. How the New Nutrition Strategy is implemented globally and in USAID’s programs
4. Review questions Is it feasible to reach our 30% goal? What is the optimal approach for delivering a
comprehensive set of nutrition interventions? How do we overcome the issues related to engaging the
private sector? 11
Targeting from pregnancy to two yearswill have the most impact
That core package costs a certain amount(World Bank 2009)
A core package of interventions isproven to improve nutrition (Lancet Series 2008)
Investing in nutrition is one of the most cost-effective buysin development (Copenhagen Consensus 2006)
47
THE RESULTSTop Ten
1 Micronutrient supplements (vitamin A & zinc) - Malnutrition2 The Doha development agenda - Trade3 Micronutrient fortification (iron and salt) - Malnutrition4 Expanded immunization coverage for children - Diseases5 Agricultural R&D - Malnutrition6 Deworming and nutrition programs at school - Malnutrition7 Lowering the price of schooling - Education8 Increase and improve girls’ schooling - Women9 Community-based nutrition promotion - Malnutrition10 Provide support for women’s reproductive role - Women
Evidence-based and consensus-driven global efforts exist
Countries are eager to scale up nutritionand our partners are aligned to support them (SUN)
1
2
3
4
5
12
The sea change in global nutrition programs is reflected in USAID’s nutrition programs
1. Type of interventions
2. Age target
3. Measurement
4. Focus
5. Delivery systems
6. Scale
Vertical, supplementation
Under fives
Nutrient-specific
Treatment
Health
Pilot
Integrated, food-based
1,000 days
Diet quality and diversity
+Prevention
+Agriculture, social protection
National
With these new approaches we aim for a 30% reduction in undernutrition13
1
2
3
4
5
6
From vertical micronutrient programsto food-based, integrated approaches
USAID supports Tanzania’s vitamin A supplementation program which has achieved high coverage for the past 10 years
In support of Tanzania’s draft National Nutrition Strategy, USAID launches a new bilateral in high burden focus regions (FTF zone of influence) with a focus on preventing stunting and behavior change
2000 2005 2010
USAID supports district-level planning and budgeting to transition the VAS program to GOT ownership
2011
14
1
Improving nutrition in Tanzania bilateral
From under five or population-wide targeting to the 1,000 days window
By 2009
1 It is the period of most vulnerability
2 Interventions after this period are not likely to have impact
3 Interventions in this period have immediate and long term consequences
Programs target pregnant women and young children under 2 years of age
2010
15
2
From nutrient-specificto measuring diet quality and diversity
2005 2010
2011
USAID provides technical assistance to WHO and UNICEF to improve measurement assessing infant and young child feeding practices
Minimum acceptable diet used to measure progress for GHI and FTF
Consensus Meeting: Definitions Established
Modules and calculation methodology provided to Demographic Health Surveys
2007
Indicators Calculated for All Countries and Guidance Provided
16
3
From recuperative to preventive approaches
2000
2011
Haiti Study: prevention approach has greater impact on nutritional status than recuperative approach
• Technical Reference Materials developed for FFP applicants
• Food for Peace lists PM2A as preferred MCHN approach in multi-year program guidance
• Burundi and Guatemala to identify most cost effective approaches
2010
2005
2011
17
4
Prevalence of stunting, 2000 and 2005
From health delivery systemsto maximizing multi-sectoral synergies
2000 2007 2010
2011
Most Nutrition Programs focused on health platforms ONLY: Minimal evidence for Agriculture and Health Linkages
Analysis of program approaches that worked: World Bank Report , CSHGP and FFP MYAP evaluations
• Bilateral programs with integrated platforms developed in 15 FTF/GHI countries
• Synergies with FFP, PEPFAR and other donors (e.g. in Uganda, Mozambique, Bangladesh)
• New Research (CRSP) to further evaluate synergies between agriculture and nutrition (e.g. Uganda and Nepal)
18
5
Changes in anthropometry, 2004-2009
17%
22%20%
14%
10%
28%
34%
30%
20%
Underweight Stunting
1996-2006: USAID supported preventive nutrition programs in 4 health regions
From pilots to scale
2002: Senegal began the Nutrition Enhancement Program (NEP)
2006: USAID-funded community-based growth promotion programs were introduced nationwide as part of phase II of NEP
2015 MDG 1 GOAL
SENEGAL: National Nutrition Enhancement Program
19
6
Outline
1. Program Context Burden of undernutrition Causes and consequences
2. Recent Sea Change in Nutrition Strategy
3. How the New Nutrition Strategy is implemented globally and in USAID’s programs
4. Review questions Is it feasible to reach our 30% goal? What is the optimal approach for delivering a
comprehensive set of nutrition interventions? How do we overcome the issues related to working with
the private sector in the nutrition program? 20
WHAT IT IS: Over 100 of our development partners involved (civil society, private
sector, UN, donors) Coordination of these partners to encourage synergy of purpose and
ensure complementarity of action based on countries’ requests
WHY WE ARE INVOLVED: GHI/FTF principles are aligned with SUN Increases our leverage and alignment with partners Provides us with concrete milestones to measure progress on scaling up
nutrition Facilitates high-level dialogue/advocacy on nutrition in countries that
can drive policies and programs Provides a barometer for country ownership: political leadership,
inclusivity of process, country budgetary commitments
USAID is part of a multilateral partnership to scale up nutrition
SCALING UP NUTRITIONMOVEMENT
21
1. Women, girls and gender equality
2. Country ownership3. Health systems
strengthening4. Multilaterals and
partnerships5. Coordination and integration6. Metrics, monitoring,
evaluation7. Research and innovation
1. Country ownership2. Coordination3. Comprehensive approach4. Multilaterals and partnerships5. Results and commitments
GHI
FTF
Country health sector strategy
Country investment plan/CAADP
FFP MYAPs
Ministry of Agriculture
Ministry of Health
Health zones
Agriculture production potential areas
Health bilaterals and local partners
FTF MYSBEST
GHI STRATEGYCDCS
Integrated frameworks reflect country priorities in multiple sectors and our FTF-GHI principles
INT
EGR
ATED
NU
TR
ITIO
N
INV
EST
MEN
T F
RA
MEW
OR
K
Local civil society
22
Integrated Nutrition Frameworks: from 0 to 15 countries
Nutrition procurements: from 7 to 16 countries (9 nutrition-sensitive and 7 nutrition-focused)
Nutrition focused staff: from 5 to 19 countries
USAID’s rapid mobilization of country programming has made good progress since 2009
23
On track
In progress
Little/no change
Prevalence and magnitude of undernutrition Country ownership Existing platforms Alignment with FTF and GHI
36 countries account for 90% of the global burden of stunting
USAID’s country focus is driven by the magnitude of the problem, country context and GHI and FTF strategy
Criteria:
24
USAID nutrition programs in 22 of the 36 highest burden countries
EthiopiaGhana*KenyaLiberia*MalawiMaliMozambiqueRwanda*Senegal*TanzaniaUgandaZambiaBangladeshCambodiaNepalGuatemalaHaiti*
BurundiBurkina FasoDR CongoMadagascarNigerSouth Sudan
Cote D’IvoireNigeriaSouth AfricaVietnam
17 core countries +6Food for
Peace
+4PEPFAR
17 countries with over 80% of the GHCS nutrition resources
SUN+Peru
+Benin+Laos 25*Not in the 36 highest burden countries due to
population size
Indicator Average across priority countries
Underweight 23%
Stunting 42%
Wasting 9%
Underweight Women 15%
Women with anemia 45%
Children with anemia 66%
Exclusive breastfeeding 48%
Minimum acceptable diet 17%
Vitamin A supplementation 52%
Iodized salt 59%
Monitoring and evaluation
DHS baselines DHS includes new
indicators Core set of nutrition
indicators for both GHI-FTF
Working with global partners to align monitoring and evaluation for nutrition (SUN)
26
NUTRITION+Social and behavior change+Monitoring and evaluation
+Community capacity
AGRICULTURE SOCIAL PROTECTIONFood supplementation to the most vulnerableAsset transfersCommunity volunteersNutrition service delivery (including CMAM)
Small holder production diversificationWomen’s control of productive assetsAgriculture extension workersIncome and employment generation
WATER INFECTIOUS DISEASES
MATERNAL CHILD HEALTHHealth worker capacities to screen and referNutrition service delivery (including CMAM)Birth spacing and family planning
Community-facility referralsReady-to-use therapeutic food productionOVCs as target populationMaternal and child anemia
Comprehensive Nutrition Investment Plan
Access to improved water sourcesHygiene behaviorsSanitation
HARNESSED AND MAXIMIZED TO ACHIEVE IMPACT27
USAID Mission bilaterals: NEPAL EXAMPLE
Reduction in underweight from 38% to 29%, Government of Nepal Target
Integrated MCH, FP and Nutrition
Bilateral
Integrated Agriculture and
Nutrition BilateralChild Survival and Health Grants
• Food Based• Agriculture• Dietary Diversity
Nepal Family Health Program II
• Prevention• Scale up
UNICEF• Prevention• Social Protection
Integrated, Food Based1,000 DaysPrevention
Agriculture, Social ProtectionDietary Diversity and Quality
Scale up
28
USAID partners with a number of other USG agencies on a range of programs …
CDC
USDA
NIH
PEPFAR
Peace Corps
DCHA
Nutrition surveillance and M&E Chronic diseases Food fortification McGovern Dole (school feeding) Nutrition and agriculture research Food safety systems
Micronutrient biomarkers (BOND program) Non Communicable Diseases HIV and nutrition
Nutrition Assessment, Counseling, and Support, including Food by Prescription Linking with economic strengthening/livelihoods/food security programs
Community-based agriculture Community worker nutrition training
MYAPs Commodity improvement Monitoring, evaluation, early warning, surveillance
State 1,000 Days Partnership SUN-related diplomacy
29
ILLUSTRATIVE
UN
WFP: emergency nutrition UNICEF: IDD, Comprehensive approach WHO: surveillance and capacity FAO: agriculture policies REACH: country-specific
Civil society
Private sector
Food products Market-driven solutions
Comprehensive approach Advocacy
FANTA 2 Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance in 20+ countries Food security programming and policy HIV and nutrition
A2Z Micronutrient supplementation and fortification programs Child blindness
IYCN Infant and young child feeding practices PMTCT
GAIN Public-private partnerships Food fortification Nutritionizing agriculture value chains
… as well as with a number of other stakeholders and USAID/W implementing partners
30
SU
N
Outline
1. Program Context Burden of undernutrition Causes and consequences
2. Recent Sea Change in Nutrition Strategy
3. How the New Nutrition Strategy is implemented globally and in USAID’s programs
4. Review questions Is it feasible to reach our 30% goal? What is the optimal approach for delivering a
comprehensive set of nutrition interventions? How do we overcome the issues related to engaging the
private sector? 31
The goal of reducing undernutrition by 30% was established in anticipation of significant increases and front-end loading of funding. Food prices have also increased drastically. The current budget scenario requires us to examine the feasibility of that 30% target.
Identify efficiencies Use subnational targets Reduce global target based on country-level analysis Cut additional countries Increase multilateral cooperation
Options:
Review question 1
Can we reach our goal with our funding levels?
32
USAID has made budget choices to increase our impact and depth of investment
FY09 FY10 FY11 (TBC)
Total GHCS Funding
$55 million $75 million $90 million
Number of countries
37 30 19
Average funding $900,000 $1,365,000 $2,685,000
Number of countries receiving less than $750,000
16 6 0
Number of countries receiving more than $3,000,000
1 6 13
33
Tier One Tier Two Non-priority0
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
70,000,000
80,000,000
90,000,000
100,000,000
FY09FY10FY11FY12
26%
18%57%
FY09 N ($55 million)
43%
26%
31%
FY10 N ($75 million)
63%
32%
5%
FY11 N ($90 million)
Percent total tier 1
Percent total tier 2
Percent total NP
USAID has prioritized countries and plans to sustain this commitment
34
What are the most important approaches for delivering a comprehensive package of interventions?
Co-locate nutrition, health, agriculture, and social protection to achieve geographic synergies
Develop socio-economic targeting approach (poverty quintile) Support high-level multisectoral government coordination
mechanisms (e.g. Malawi) Work with other donors on prioritization of interventions Continued learning on cost-effectiveness of agriculture-health
linkages
Options:
Review question 2
35
OPTIONS: How do we nutritionalize value chains? How do we focus them on the bottom of the pyramid? How do we build capacity of small and medium scale enterprises? What are meaningful incentives for the private sector?
Review question 3
How do we overcome the issues related to engaging the private sector?
36
37
Update: GH Portfolio
Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project 2 (FANTA 2)
A2Z Micronutrient and Child Blindness Project
Infant and Young Child Nutrition Project
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition
Child Survival and Health Grants Program
Maternal and Child Health Integrated Program
Iodine Deficiency Disorder (UNICEF)
2010
NEW AWARD: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project 3 (FANTA 3)
NEW AWARD: Strengthening Partnerships, Results, and Innovation for Nutrition Globally (SPRING)
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition
Child Survival and Health Grants Program
Maternal and Child Health Integrated Program
Iodine Deficiency Disorder (UNICEF)
2012