-
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Numb directs the subcellular localization of EAAT3
throughbinding the YxNxxF motifJin-Feng Su1, Jian Wei2, Pei-Shan
Li3, Hong-Hua Miao3, Yong-Chao Ma2, Yu-Xiu Qu3, Jie Xu3, Jie
Qin3,Bo-Liang Li3, Bao-Liang Song2, Zheng-Ping Xu1,* and Jie
Luo2,*
ABSTRACTExcitatory amino acid transporter type 3 (EAAT3, also
known asSLC1A1) is a high-affinity, Na+-dependent glutamate carrier
thatlocalizes primarily within the cell and at the apical
plasmamembrane.Although previous studies have reported proteins and
sequenceregions involved in EAAT3 trafficking, the detailed
molecularmechanism by which EAAT3 is distributed to the correct
locationstill remains elusive. Here, we identify that the YVNGGF
sequence inthe C-terminus of EAAT3 is responsible for its
intracellular localizationand apical sorting in rat hepatoma cells
CRL1601 and Madin–Darbycanine kidney (MDCK) cells, respectively. We
further demonstratethat Numb, a clathrin adaptor protein, directly
binds the YVNGGFmotif and regulates the localization of
EAAT3.Mutation of Y503, N505and F508 within the YVNGGF motif to
alanine residues or silencingNumb by use of small interfering RNA
(siRNA) results in the aberrantlocalization of EAAT3. Moreover,
both Numb and the YVNGGF motifmediate EAAT3 endocytosis in CRL1601
cells. In summary, our studysuggests that Numb is a pivotal adaptor
protein that mediates thesubcellular localization of EAAT3 through
binding the YxNxxF (wherex stands for any amino acid) motif.
KEY WORDS: Numb, EAAT3, YxNxxF, Endocytosis, NPC1L1, PTB
INTRODUCTIONExcitatory amino acid transporter type 3 (EAAT3,
also known asSLC1A1), the human homolog of rodent excitatory amino
acidcarrier 1 (EAAC1), is a Na+-dependent glutamate transporter
highlyexpressed in a wide variety of tissues including the central
nervoussystem, heart, intestine and kidney (Danbolt, 2001; Kanai
andHediger, 1992; Shayakul et al., 1997). EAAT3 in the
postsynapticneurons contributes to glutamate and cysteine uptake
(Amara andFontana, 2002; Bianchi et al., 2014; Danbolt, 2001;
Nieoullon et al.,2006), whereas in the epithelial cells of kidney
and intestine itmediates the absorption and reabsorption of
dicarboxylic aminoacids (Bailey et al., 2011). EAAT3 predominately
exists in a largeintracellular pool and is rapidly delivered to the
plasma membranein response to excitatory stimuli (Conti et al.,
1998; Davis et al.,1998; Gonzalez et al., 2002; Kugler and Schmitt,
1999; Najimiet al., 2002; Yang and Kilberg, 2002), a process
facilitated by Rab11(Gonzalez et al., 2007b),
synaptosomal-associated protein of
23 kDa (Fournier and Robinson, 2006) and caveolin-1 (Gonzalezet
al., 2007a). EAAT3 can also be constitutively internalized fromthe
plasma membrane through clathrin-dependent and clathrin-independent
pathways (Gonzalez et al., 2007a,b). The detailedmolecular
mechanisms involved in the translocation processes,however, have
yet to be determined.
Numb is a clathrin-associated sorting protein (CLASP) with
aphosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domain, a proline-rich region
(PRR)and two carboxyl tripeptidemotifs (DPF andNPF). The
PTBdomainof Numb recognizes the conserved NPxY motif (where x
stands forany amino acid) of cargo proteins, whereas the DPF and
NPF motifsrecruit the α-adaptin subunit of adaptor protein complex
2 (AP2) andEps15 homology domain-containing proteins (EHDs),
respectively(Maldonado-Baez andWendland, 2006; Santolini et al.,
2000; Uhliket al., 2005; Yap and Winckler, 2015). Numb has been
stronglyimplicated in the endocytosis of Notch, E-cadherin, β1
integrin,amyloid precursor protein (APP), tyrosine receptor kinase
B (TrkB)and P-selectin (Kyriazis et al., 2008; McGill et al., 2009;
Nishimuraand Kaibuchi, 2007; Sato et al., 2011; Schluter et al.,
2009; Zhouet al., 2011). In addition, we have recently reported
that Numb bindsthe YVNHSF motif of Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 (NPC1L1)
andpromotes NPC1L1-mediated cholesterol absorption (Ge et al.,
2011;Li et al., 2014; Wei et al., 2014).
In the current study, we show that EAAT3 contains a
six-amino-acid motif YVNGGF in the C-terminus that directs its
intracellularlocalization in rat hepatomaMcArdle RH7777 (CRL1601)
cells andits apical localization inMadin–Darby canine kidney (MDCK)
cells.This YVNGGF motif preferentially interacts with Numb but
notother CLASPs. Specifically, Y503, N505 and F508 of
theYVNGGFmotif are crucial for Numb binding to EAAT3. Mutating
theseresidues or silencingNumbby use of small interferingRNA
(siRNA)results in the aberrant localization of EAAT3 in both
CRL1601 andMDCK cells. Furthermore, we provide direct evidence that
Numband the YVNGGF motif mediate EAAT3 endocytosis in CRL1601cells.
Taken together, our results suggest that the interaction
betweenNumb and theYxNxxFmotif regulates the subcellular
localization ofEAAT3 in both non-polarized and polarized cells.
RESULTSTheYVNGGFmotif is required for the subcellular
localizationof EAAT3Our previous studies have shown that the YVNHSF
motif, anendocytic peptide signal recognized by the adaptor protein
Numb, iscrucial for NPC1L1 endocytosis (Li et al., 2014; Wei et
al., 2014).Interestingly, replacing the first residue in this
motif, tyrosine (Y),with phenylalanine (F), the final residue
phenylalanine (F) withtyrosine (Y), or the histidine-serine (HS)
residues for two alanine(AA) residues does not impair the
interaction between NPC1L1 andNumb (P.-S.L. and B.-L.S.,
unpublished results). To identify otherproteins that harbor this
potential Numb-bindingmotif, we usedY[F]Received 7 January 2016;
Accepted 24 June 2016
1Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of
InfectiousDiseases, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
2College of LifeSciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.
3State Key Laboratory ofMolecular Biology, Institute of
Biochemistry andCell Biology, Shanghai Institutes forBiological
Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
*Authors for correspondence ([email protected];
[email protected])
J.L., 0000-0003-1899-3111
3104
© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of
Cell Science (2016) 129, 3104-3114 doi:10.1242/jcs.185496
Journal
ofCe
llScience
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://orcid.org/0000-0003-1899-3111
-
VNxxF[Y] as a query to search the ExPASy database
(http://myhits.vital-it.ch/cgi-bin/pattern_search) and found 164
candidates(Table S1). Among these hits, 46 were known to have
plasmamembrane localization according to DAVID functional
annotationanalysis (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsp) (Table S1).
They areintegral membrane proteins or peripheral membrane proteins.
Wefurther narrowed down the search by limiting the
Y[F]VNxxF[Y]motif to the last 100 amino acids of the cytoplasmic
C-terminal tail.The screen revealed five proteins including NPC1L1,
EAAT3,paxillin (PXN), protein kinase Cα (PRKCA) and protein kinase
Cδ(PRKCD). The presence of NPC1L1 in the list is expected and
servesas a positive control suggesting that our search was
legitimate.Besides NPC1L1, EAAT3 is the only transmembrane protein.
Giventhat PRKCA and PRKCD belong to the same protein family, we
onlytested PRKCA here. The sequences containing the common
Y[F]VNxxF[Y] motif of EAAT3, PXN and PRKCA are shown inFig. S1A. To
determinewhether theY[F]VNxxF[Y]motif directs thelocalization of
these proteins, we prepared plasmids expressingMyc-tagged EAAT3,
PXN or PRKCA containing the wild-type (WT)motif or mutated motif in
which Y[F]VN was replaced by AAA(denoted 3A). We then transfected
CRL1601 and MDCK cells,namely a non-polarized hepatoma cell line
and a widely usedpolarized cell model respectively, with these
constructs andevaluated the subcellular localization of each
protein usingconfocal microscopy. The expression patterns of PXN
andPRKCA remained relatively unaltered in both cell lines
transfectedwith 3A motif compared with those with WT motif (Fig.
S1B).However, alanine substitutions in the Y[F]VNxxF[Y]
motifredistributed EAAT3 to the periphery of CRL1601 and MDCKcells
(Fig. S1B).We next immunolabeled the plasma membrane of CRL1601
cells
with an antibody against the transfected T-cell surface
glycoproteinCD8 and the basolateral surface of MDCK cells with an
antibodyagainst endogenous E-cadherin. The localization of the WT
and 3Amutant forms of EAAT3 relative to these markers was
thenexamined using three-dimensional (3D) reconstituted
confocalimages. The WT form of EAAT3 was mainly present in
thecytoplasm of CRL1601 cells (Fig. 1A; Movie 1). The 3A
mutation,however, resulted in a noticeable redistribution of EAAT3
to theplasma membrane as evidenced by the colocalization of
EAAT3and CD8 (Fig. 1A;Movie 2). In polarizedMDCK cells, EAAT3
thatoriginally stayed in the cytoplasm and at the apical surface
wasredirected to the E-cadherin-decorated basolateral surface
following3A mutation (Fig. 1A; Movies 3 and 4).We next sought to
determine the specific location of EAAT3
within the cell. CRL1601 and MDCK cells were transfected
withplasmids expressing the Myc-tagged WT form of EAAT3
incombination with GFP-tagged Rab11 or LAMP1, which
localizesspecifically to the endocytic recycling compartment and
lysosome,respectively. The Golgi was immunolabeled with an
antibodyagainst endogenous GM130 (also known as GOLGA2). We
foundthat the vast majority of EAAT3 colocalized with Rab11.
Partialoverlap between EAAT3 and LAMP1 was also detected.
However,there remained very little association between EAAT3 and
GM130(Fig. 1B,C). These results suggest that EAAT3 mainly localizes
inthe recycling endosomes.
Y503, N505 and F508 in the YVNGGFmotif are crucial for
thesubcellular localization of EAAT3The YVNGGF motif is highly
conserved among vertebrate EAAT3proteins (Fig. 2A). To further
decipher the key amino acids withinthis motif that are essential
for the subcellular localization of
EAAT3, we prepared seven EAAT3 mutants including the 3Amutant as
described above, as well as six single alanine replacementmutants
including Y503A, V504A, N505A, G506A, G507A andF508A. Each plasmid
was transiently transfected into CRL1601 andMDCK cells, and the
distribution of EAAT3 variants was analyzedby confocal microscopy.
In addition to 3A mutant, the Y503A,N505A and F508A mutation also
resulted in a dramaticredistribution of EAAT3 to the CD8-labeled
plasma membrane ofCRL1601 cells (Fig. 2B,C), or at the
E-cadherin-labeled basolateralsurface of MDCK cells (Fig. 2D,E). In
contrast, alanine replacementat V504, G506 or G507 did not affect
EAAT3 localization (Fig. 2D,E). These data suggest that Y503, N505
and F508 residues tightlyregulate the subcellular localization of
EAAT3.
TheYVNGGFmotif of EAAT3 selectively interactswithNumbHuman EAAT3
is a protein of 524 amino acids with tentransmembrane segments and
the YVNGGF motif (amino acids503–508) resides in the cytoplasmic
C-terminus (Fig. 3A). To gaininsights into whether the YVNGGF motif
of EAAT3 interacts withNumb or other CLASPs, including autosomal
recessivehypercholesterolemia (ARH, also known as LDLRAP1),
disabledhomolog 2 (Dab2) and PTB domain-containing engulfment
adaptorprotein 1 (GULP1, hereafter referred to as GULP)
(Maldonado-Baez and Wendland, 2006; Maurer and Cooper, 2006;
Sirinianet al., 2005; Su et al., 2002), we expressed and purified a
GST-tagged C-terminal tail of EAAT3 containing the WT
[GST–EAAT3-C(WT)] or 3A mutant [GST–EAAT3-C(3A)] motif, aswell as
His6-tagged ARH and His6-tagged PTB domains of Numb,Dab2 and GULP
(Fig. 3B). GST–EAAT3-C(WT) or GST–EAAT3-C(3A) was then incubated
with each of the His6-tagged CLASPspreviously coupled to Ni beads,
and the eluate from the beads wasanalyzed for the presence of GST.
As shown in Fig. 3C, Numb butnot the other CLASPs preferentially
bound to EAAT3-C(WT). Allfour adaptor proteins, including Numb,
however, failed to interactwith EAAT3-C(3A). These results suggest
that the YVNGGF motifof EAAT3 is specifically recognized by
Numb.
Y503, N505 and F508 in the YVNGGF motif of EAAT3 arecrucial for
Numb bindingTo investigate the contribution of every single amino
acid in theYVNGGF motif to EAAT3–Numb interaction, we prepared
GST-taggedEAAT3-C(WT), EAAT3-C(3A) and recombinantswith
singlealanine mutations, namely EAAT3-C(Y503A, V504A, N505A,G506A,
G507A or F508A), from E.coli. These recombinants werethen subjected
to in vitro pulldown with the His6-tagged PTBdomain of Numb as
described above. In addition to EAAT3-C(WT),variants carrying the
V504A, G506A or G507Amutations were alsoable to bind to Numb with
various affinities. The 3A, Y503A,N505A and F508Amutants, however,
could not interact with Numb(Fig. 4A). These results indicate that
residues Y503, N505 and F508in the YVNGGF motif are imperative for
the binding of Numb toEAAT3.
To further confirm the EAAT3–Numb interaction, we co-transfected
HEK293 cells with a plasmid expressing a Myc-taggedWT or 3A form of
EAAT3 [Myc–EAAT3(WT) or Myc–EAAT3(3A)] together with a plasmid
expressing Flag-tagged Numb(Flag–Numb). Cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated by anti-Mycbeads and then analyzed for the
presence of Flag. We found thatNumb preferentially bound to
Myc–EAAT3(WT) but not Myc–EAAT3(3A) (Fig. 4B), further confirming
that the YVNGGFmotif is required for the interaction between EAAT3
andNumb. Moreover, we immunoprecipitated Numb from mouse
3105
RESEARCH ARTICLE Journal of Cell Science (2016) 129, 3104-3114
doi:10.1242/jcs.185496
Journal
ofCe
llScience
http://myhits.vital-it.ch/cgi-bin/pattern_searchhttp://myhits.vital-it.ch/cgi-bin/pattern_searchhttp://myhits.vital-it.ch/cgi-bin/pattern_searchhttp://jcs.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/jcs.185496.supplementalhttps://david.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsphttps://david.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsphttp://jcs.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/jcs.185496.supplementalhttp://jcs.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/jcs.185496.supplementalhttp://jcs.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/jcs.185496.supplementalhttp://jcs.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/jcs.185496.supplementalhttp://jcs.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/jcs.185496.supplementalhttp://jcs.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/jcs.185496.supplementalhttp://jcs.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/jcs.185496.supplementalhttp://jcs.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/jcs.185496.supplemental
-
brain lysates using protein A/G beads previously coupled withthe
anti-Numb antibody, and detected the appearance ofEAAT3 in the
pellet. Reciprocally, Numb was also observedefficiently
co-immunoprecipitated with EAAT3 (Fig. 4C). Takentogether, these
results suggest that EAAT3 directly interacts withNumb.
Numb is required for EAAT3 endocytosisPrevious studies have
shown that Numb regulates the endocytosis ofmultiple proteins
including Notch, E-cadherin, β1 integrin, APP,TrkB and P-selectin
(Kyriazis et al., 2008; McGill et al., 2009;Nishimura and Kaibuchi,
2007; Sato et al., 2011; Schluter et al.,2009; Zhou et al., 2011).
In addition, Numb has been recently
Fig. 1. Triple alanine mutations in the YVNGGFmotif increase the
surface and the basolaterallocalization of EAAT3 in CRL1601 cells
andMDCK cells, respectively. (A) The subcellularlocalization of WT
and 3A EAAT3 (red) in CRL1601and MDCK cells. Transfected
Flag-tagged CD8 (inCRL1601) and endogenous E-cadherin (in
MDCK)(green) are used as plasma membrane andbasolateral
membranemarkers, respectively. Imagesfrom the yz and xz planes, and
3D reconstitutions arealso included. (B) Colocalization of EAAT3
withorganelle-specific markers in CRL1601 and MDCKcells. Cells were
co-transfected with Myc-taggedEAAT3 (red) in combination with
GFP–Rab11 orGFP–LAMP1 (green). GM130 (green) is a Golgimarker.
Scale bars: 10 μm. (C) The percentages ofEAAT3 that colocalized
with the organelle-specificmarkers shown in B. Data are presented
as mean±s.d., n=100, from three independent experiments.
3106
RESEARCH ARTICLE Journal of Cell Science (2016) 129, 3104-3114
doi:10.1242/jcs.185496
Journal
ofCe
llScience
-
identified to drive NPC1L1 internalization through binding to
theYVNHSF motif (Ge et al., 2011; Li et al., 2014; Wei et al.,
2014).We thus reasoned that Numb, through recognition of the
YVNGGFsequence, directs the endocytosis of EAAT3. To test
thishypothesis, we co-transfected CRL1601 cells with
Myc-taggedEAAT3, Flag-tagged CD8 and siRNA targeting NUMB and
then
evaluated the distribution of EAAT3. The levels of Numb
proteinwere severely attenuated by two independent siRNA
duplexes(Fig. 5A). As a result, EAAT3 was predominantly relocated
to theplasma membrane and co-immunostained with CD8 (Fig.
5B,C).Similarly, we knocked down NUMB in MDCK cells (Fig. 5D)
andobserved a markedly increased basolateral localization of
EAAT3
Fig. 2. Y503, N505 and F508 in theYVNGGF motif are crucial for
thesubcellular localization of EAAT3.(A) An alignment of vertebrate
EAAT3C-terminal sequences among variousspecies. The conserved
YVNGGF motifsare highlighted with a gray background.The red box
denotes the human EAAT3YVNGGF motif. (B) The
subcellularlocalization of EAAT3 in CRL1601 cellstransfected with
various Myc-taggedEAAT3 constructs (red). Flag-taggedCD8 (green)
was co-transfected as aplasma membrane marker. (C) Thepercentages
of EAAT3 that colocalizedwith CD8 for the experiments shown inB.
Data are presented as mean±s.d.,n=100, from three
independentexperiments. ***P
-
(Fig. 5E,F). To exclude possible off-target effects of the
siRNA, wetransfected NUMB-knockdown cells with plasmid encoding
ansiRNA-resistant Numb. Numb-DLA, which carries a mutation inthe
DPF motif and cannot recruit AP2 (Santolini et al., 2000),
wasincluded as a negative control. Exogenous WT Numb, but
notNumb-DLA, completely reversed the aberrant EAAT3
patterningresulted from NUMB knockdown in CRL1601 cells (Fig. 6).
Thesedata suggest that the clathrin adaptor Numb is crucially
involved inEAAT3 internalization.To investigate whether the YVNGGF
motif directly mediates the
translocation of EAAT3 from the cell surface to the internal
pool, weconstructed traceable WT and 3A forms of EAAT3 in which
threeFlag tags were inserted into the second extracellular domain
of theprotein [Flag–EAAT3(WT) or Flag–EAAT3(3A)], permitting
theintracellular trafficking of EAAT3 to be tracked using an
anti-Flagantibody (Fig. 7A). CRL1601 cells transfected with
Flag–EAAT3(WT) or Flag–EAAT3(3A) were incubated with the
anti-Flagantibody for 1 h at 4°C so that EAAT3 on the cell surface
wasfully labeled by the antibody. Cells were then washed and
shifted to37°C to initiate the endocytosis of EAAT3–antibody
complex. Atdifferent time points, cells were washed with stripping
buffer todissociate the antibody on the surface, followed by
permeabilizationand fluorescence detection of the internalized
antibody. At the 0 mintime point without stripping (Fig. 7B, no
stripping), we observed a
minimal Flag signal on the surface of cells transfected
Flag–EAAT3(WT), consistent with the notion that EAAT3 stays
primarily withinthe intracellular pool under physiological
conditions (Conti et al.,1998; Fournier et al., 2004; Gonzalez et
al., 2002; Kugler andSchmitt, 1999; Sims et al., 2000; Yang and
Kilberg, 2002). In cellstransfected with Flag–EAAT3(3A), however, a
much strongerlabeling was detected given that the 3A mutation
substantiallyenhances EAAT3 localization at the cell surface (Figs
1A and 2B,C).The addition of the stripping buffer successfully
removed the anti-Flag antibody on the cell surface (Fig. 7B, 0 min
time point).Compared with that of the 0 min time point, Flag
staining wasmarkedly elevated at the 15, 30, 60 min time points in
cellstransfected with Flag–EAAT3(WT). This phenotype, however,
wascompletely abolished in cells transfected with
Flag–EAAT3(3A)(Fig. 7B,C, 0 to 60 min time points), despite there
being moreEAAT3(3A) on the plasmamembrane at the beginning.We
similarlyevaluated the effects of Numb on EAAT3 endocytosis using
theinternalization assay as described above. EAAT3 endocytosis
wasbarely detectable in NUMB-knockdown cells. However,
re-expressing siRNA-resistant Numb significantly restored
EAAT3internalization to the extent found in control cells (Fig.
7D,E). Takentogether, these results demonstrate that the YVNGGF
motif andNumb are required for the endocytosis of EAAT3 from the
plasmamembrane to the internal pool in CRL1601 cells.
Fig. 3. EAAT3 preferentially interacts with Numb. (A)
Anillustration of the in vitro pulldown assay. Recombinant
His6-tagged CLASPs (His6–Numb-PTB, His6–ARH, His6–Dab2-PTB and
His6–GULP-PTB) were bound to Ni-NTA beads andtested for the
interaction with the GST-tagged C-terminal tail(amino acids
441–524) of EAAT3 [GST–EAAT3-C(441-524)].(B) Purified recombinant
His6-tagged CLASPs visualized bySDS-PAGE and Coomassie Brilliant
Blue staining. (C) Theinteractions between His6-tagged CLASPs and
GST-taggedEAAT3-C containing a WT [GST–EAAT3-C(WT)] or 3A
mutant[GST–EAAT3-C(3A)] motif were analyzed by an in vitropulldown
assay. IB, immunoblot.
3108
RESEARCH ARTICLE Journal of Cell Science (2016) 129, 3104-3114
doi:10.1242/jcs.185496
Journal
ofCe
llScience
-
DISCUSSIONEAAT3 is mainly intracellular with only 20–30% of
thetransporter found on the cell surface (Conti et al., 1998;
Kuglerand Schmitt, 1999; Yang and Kilberg, 2002). However,
itconstitutively shuttles between the intracellular compartmentsand
the plasma membrane with a half-life of ∼5 min (Fournieret al.,
2004). A variety of intracellular signaling pathways
andprotein–protein interactions have been implicated in
themodulation of EAAT3 trafficking. For example, activation
ofprotein kinase C (PKC), platelet-derived growth factor
(PDGF)receptor or neurotensin receptor can increase the abundance
andactivity of EAAT3 on the surface of both C6 glioma cells
andprimary neuronal cultures (Guillet et al., 2005; Najimi et
al.,2002). The interaction between PDZ-domain-containing protein
1(PDZK1) and the C-terminus of EAAT3 also accelerates thedelivery
to and the retention on the plasma membrane of EAAT3in MDCK cells
(D’Amico et al., 2010). Furthermore, cholesteroland isoflurane have
been shown to promote the surface expressionof EAAT3 from
intracellular stores (Huang et al., 2006; Huangand Zuo, 2005;
Lortet et al., 2008). In contrast, syntaxin 1Adirectly interacts
with EAAT3 on the surface and potentiates theclathrin- and
dynamin-dependent internalization of the protein,thus leading to
the inhibition of EAAT3-mediated glutamatetransport (Yu et al.,
2006). In addition, caveolin-1, by formingcomplexes with EAAT1,
regulates EAAT3 cycling on and off theplasma membrane (Gonzalez et
al., 2007a). Here, we identified
Numb as a direct EAAT3-associated protein involved in
EAAT3endocytosis in CRL1601 cells. Knocking down NUMB
increasedEAAT3 localization on the surface by blocking the
internalizationof transporters into the internal pool. These
results are consistentwith previous findings showing that the
clathrin-dependentpathway contributes to constitutive endocytosis
of EAAT3(Gonzalez et al., 2007b; Yu et al., 2006). However, we
cannotexclude the possibility that Numb might slow down the
transportof EAAT3 from the intracellular compartments to the
plasmamembrane.
In previous studies, the YVNGGFSVDKSD sequence in EAAT3had been
determined to guide EAAT3 insertion into the plasmamembrane of C6
glioma cells following PDGF and PKC stimulation(Sheldon et al.,
2006). Another group has reported that theKSYVNGGFAVD sequence in
the C-terminus of EAAT3 isrequired for the apical sorting in MDCK
cells and the dendriticlocalization in hippocampal neurons (Cheng
et al., 2002).Interestingly, we show that the YVNGGF sorting motif,
whichfalls within the above two sequences, regulates the
subcellularlocalization of EAAT3 in CRL1601 and MDCK cells. Thus,
theYVNGGF motif represents a key signal for EAAT3 trafficking.More
importantly, we provide the first evidence that Y503, N505and F508
in the YVNGGF motif are crucial for Numb binding aswell as for the
subcellular localization of EAAT3.
The YxNxxF motif has recently been identified as an
endocyticsignal motif mediating the internalization of NPC1L1, a
process
Fig. 4. Y503, N505 and F508 in the YVNGGF motif are
indispensable for the interaction between EAAT3 and Numb. (A) The
interactions between His6–Numb-PTB and various GST-tagged EAAT3
were analyzed by an in vitro pull-down assay. (B)
Immunoprecipitation (IP) analysis of the indicated amount of
Flag-tagged Numb and Myc-tagged EAAT3 with a WT [Myc–EAAT3(WT)] or
3A mutant [Myc–EAAT3(3A)] motif in HEK293 cells. (C) IP analysis of
EAAT3 andNumb in mouse brain lysates. Left, Numb (Pellet)
immunoprecipitated by protein A/G beads coupled to the anti-Numb
antibody was assessed by western blottingwith the anti-EAAT3
antibody. Right, EAAT3 (Pellet) immunoprecipitated by protein A/G
beads coupled to the anti-EAAT3 antibody was assessed bywestern
blotting with the anti-Numb antibody. IB, immunoblot.
3109
RESEARCH ARTICLE Journal of Cell Science (2016) 129, 3104-3114
doi:10.1242/jcs.185496
Journal
ofCe
llScience
-
that involves Numb but not ARH or Dab2 (Ge et al., 2011; Liet
al., 2014; Wei et al., 2014). Similarly, we demonstrate thatEAAT3
internalization in CRL1601 cells relies on the YxNxxFmotif and
Numb, and that other CLASPs with a homologous PTBdomain, including
ARH, Dab2 and GULP, fail to bind theYxNxxF motif. It is noteworthy
that the YxNxxF motif highlyresembles the consensus (F/Y)xNPx(F/Y)
motif in thecytoplasmic tail of Notch, β1 integrin, APP, TrkB and
LDLR(Chen et al., 1990; Kyriazis et al., 2008; McGill et al.,
2009;Nishimura and Kaibuchi, 2007; Zhou et al., 2011).
Furthermore,both YxNxxF and (F/Y)xNPx(F/Y) motifs conform to the
six-amino-acid region involved in the rapid internalization of
thecation-dependent mannose-6 phosphate receptor in whicharomatic
residues are located at the first and sixth positions(Johnson et
al., 1990). These findings, together with our results,suggest that
the (F/Y)xNxx(F/Y) motif constitutes a generalsequence mediating
the internalization of membrane proteins.In summary, we report that
Numb directs the correct
compartmentalization of EAAT3 in non-polarized CRL1601
andpolarized MDCK cells through binding to a highly conservedYxNxxF
motif. Clarifying the requirement of Numb for thesubcellular
localization of EAAT3 might shed light on thecontribution of this
transporter to glutamate and glutathionehomeostasis in neurons and
epithelial cells.
MATERIALS AND METHODSPlasmidsThe coding region of human NUMB and
EAAT3 was amplified from Huh7cells and HEK293 cells, respectively,
by standard PCR and cloned into thep3xFLAG-CMV-10 vector or the
pcDNA3.0 vector containing a C-terminal5×Myc tag. Site-directed
mutagenesis was performed using KOD Hot StartDNA polymerase
(Novagen). pRSET vectors expressing His6-tagged ARH,Dab2-PTB (amino
acids 1–220) and GULP-PTB (amino acids 1–154) weregenerous gifts
from Paul A. Welling (University of Maryland School ofMedicine,
Baltimore, MD). EAAT3-C (amino acids 441–524) containing aWT or a
mutated YVNGGF motif were cloned into the pGEX-4T-3 vector.For
Flag–EAAT3(WT) and Flag–EAAT3(3A), a 3×Flag tag was insertedbetween
E152 and N153 of EAAT3 containing either a WT or 3A mutatedmotif in
the pcDNA3.0 vector.
Cell cultureCRL1601,MDCKandHEK293cellswere grown in amonolayer
at 37°Cunder5% CO2. Cells were maintained in medium A (Dulbecco’s
modified Eagle’smedium containing 100 units ml−1 penicillin and 100
μg ml−1 streptomycinsulfate) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine
serum (FBS).
Animals8-week-old male BALB/Cmicewere used in accordancewith the
guidelinesof the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the
ShanghaiInstitutes for Biological Sciences. Mice were housed under
a 12-h-light–12-h-dark cycle and had access to food and water ad
libitum.
Fig. 5. NUMB knockdown results in aberrantsubcellular
localization of EAAT3.(A) Immunoblots showing the extent of
NUMBdepletion in CRL1601 cells using twoindependent siRNA duplexes
against NUMB(siNumb-1 and siNumb-2). CHC, clathrin heavychain. (B)
The subcellular localization of EAAT3in CRL1601 cells
co-transfected with Myc-tagged EAAT3 (red), Flag-tagged CD8
(green)and siRNAs (control, siNumb-1 or siNumb-2).Scale bar: 10 μm.
(C) The percentages ofEAAT3 that colocalized with CD8 for
theexperiments shown in B. Data are presented asmean±s.d., n=100,
from three independentexperiments. ***P
-
AntibodiesAntibodies were as follows: mouse monoclonal anti-CHC
(1:2000, cat. no.610500, BD Transduction Laboratories, San Jose,
CA); rabbit polyclonalanti-Numb (1:1000, cat. no. sc-25668, Santa
Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas,TX, and 1:1000, cat. no. 2756, Cell
Signaling, Danvers, MA); rabbitpolyclonal anti-EAAT3 (1:1000, cat.
no. sc-25658, Santa CruzBiotechnology); mouse monoclonal
anti-E-cadherin (1:200, cat. no.U3454, Sigma, St Louis, MO); mouse
monoclonal anti-His (1:1000, cat.no. M20001L, Abmart, Berkeley
Heights, NJ); rabbit polyclonal anti-Myc(1:1000, cat. no. 06-549,
Millipore, Billerica, MA); mouse monoclonalanti-Flag (1:1000, cat.
no. F1804, Sigma); mouse monoclonal anti-GM130(1:1000, cat. no.
610823, BD Transduction Laboratories); rabbitpolyclonal anti-GST,
produced in our laboratory; mouse monoclonal anti-Myc was prepared
from the 9E10 hybridoma cell line (ATCC);
Alexa-Fluor-555-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit-IgG (1:1000, cat. no.
A31572) andAlexa-Fluor-488-conjugated goat anti-mouse-IgG (1:1000,
cat. no.A11001) from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA);
horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-mouse-IgG (1:10,000,
cat. no.111587) and anti-rabbit-IgG (1:10,000, cat. no. 113096)
from Jackson ImmunoResearchLaboratories (West Grove, PA).
ImmunofluorescenceCells grown on glass coverslips were fixed
with 4% paraformaldehyde(PFA) in PBS for 20 min at room temperature
and washed with PBS. Cellswere permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100
in PBS for 5 min and blocked
with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 1 h at room
temperature.Cells were then incubated with primary antibodies for 1
h at roomtemperature, washed with PBS three times and incubated
with secondaryantibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were
examined and imagedunder a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope. A
total of 100 cells from threeindependent experiments were
scored.
In vitro pulldown assayRecombinant proteins, including
GST–EAAT3-C(WT), GST–EAAT3-Cwith the 3A, Y503A, V504A, N505A,
G506A, G507A, F508A mutations,His6-tagged ARH and His6-tagged PTB
domains of Dab2, GULP andNumb were expressed in Escherichia coli
(BL21; Invitrogen) and purifiedunder non-denaturing conditions
using glutathione–Sepharose 4 Fast Flow(GE Healthcare) or Ni-NTA
Agarose (Qiagen) following themanufacturers’ instructions. Aliquots
of Ni-NTA bead slurry containing50 μM His6-tagged protein were
mixed with 20 μM GST-tagged protein in300 μl of binding buffer (20
mM HEPES pH 7.5, 20 mM imidazole,120 mM potassium acetate, 10%
glycerol, and 0.1% Triton X-100) andincubated for 1 h on a rotating
platform at 4°C. Beads were spun down at2000 g for 5 min and washed
five times with the binding buffer. Proteinswere then eluted from
the beads in the loading buffer and subjected towestern blot
analysis. The immunoblots were probed with anti-His andanti-GST
antibodies.
ImmunoprecipitationCells or brains were homogenized in the lysis
buffer (5 mM EDTA, 5 mMEGTA, 0.5% NP-40, and protease inhibitors).
Lysates were incubated withProtein A/G agarose (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) coupled to anti-Myc, anti-Numb or anti-EAAT3
antibody for 2 h at 4°C. Beads were spun down at2000 g for 5 min
and washed five times with the binding buffer. Proteinswere then
eluted from the beads in the loading buffer and subjected towestern
blot analysis. The immunoblots were probed with anti-Numb
andanti-EAAT3 antibodies.
ImmunoblottingCells were harvested and homogenized in 120 μl of
RIPA buffercontaining protease inhibitors. The protein
concentration of whole-celllysates was determined using Lowry
method (Bio-Rad). Samples weremixed with the loading buffer and
boiled for 10 min. Proteins wereresolved by SDS-PAGE
electrophoresis and transferred ontonitrocellulose membranes.
Immunoblots were blocked with 5% BSA inTBS containing 0.075% Tween
20 and probed with primary antibodiesovernight at 4°C. After
washing in TBST three times, blots wereincubated with secondary
antibodies for 1 h at room temperature.Immunoreactivity was
developed with SuperSignal chemiluminescentsubstrate (Thermo
Scientific).
RNA interferenceDuplexes of siRNAwere synthesized byGenepharma
(Shanghai, China): ratsiNumb-1, 5′-GGACCUCAUAGUUGACCAG-3′; rat
siNumb-2, 5′-GC-UGUCCCUACGCAUCAAU-3′; dog siNumb-3,
5′-GAUGUCACCCUU-UAAACGC-3′; dog siNumb-4,
5′-CCAAGGGAAUGCAUUCCUU-3′;control, 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUU-3′.
CRL1601 and MDCKcells were plated at a density of 80,000 cells per
well and 50,000cells per well, respectively, in 12-well plates (day
0). Cells were thentransfected with siRNA oligonucleotides (50
nmol) using Oligofectamine(Life Technologies) 24 h later (day 1).
One additional transfection wasperformed on day 3, and cells were
harvested on day 4.
EAAT3 endocytosis assayCells grown on glass coverslips were
washed with ice-cold PBS andincubated with the anti-Flag antibody
(1:1000) in ice-cold medium for 1 h at4°C. Cells were rinsed twice
with ice-cold PBS and transferred to a 37°Cincubator to allow
endocytosis for different time intervals. After incubation,cells
were returned to 4°C and washed with the stripping buffer (0.2
Macetic acid, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 2.8) to remove any uninternalized
antibody onthe surface. Cells were finally washed with ice-cold
PBS, fixed with 4%
Fig. 6. ExogenousNumb rescues the altered EAAT3 localization
inNumb-knockdown cells. (A) The subcellular localization of EAAT3
in CRL1601 cellsco-transfected with Myc-tagged EAAT3 (red), siRNA
(control or siNumb-1) andsiRNA-resistant Flag-tagged Numb or
Numb-DLA (green). Asterisks indicatecells with Numb or Numb-DLA
expression. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) Thepercentages of EAAT3 in the
cytoplasm for the experiments shown in A. Dataare presented as
mean±s.d., n=100, from three independent experiments.***P
-
PFA in PBS, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS and
stainedwith Alexa-Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies.
Quantification of fluorescence intensityThe fluorescence
intensity of cells was quantified using Image Jsoftware (National
Institutes of Health). Colocalization was analyzedusing the
colocalization indices plugin. Manders’ overlap coefficients,
which allow the quantification of overlapping pixels from each
channel,were calculated. An overlap coefficient equivalent to 1 was
defined as100%.
Statistical analysesResults are presented as mean±s.d. All the
data were analyzed by unpairedtwo-tailed Student’s t-test or
one-way ANOVA.
Fig. 7. The YVNGGF motif and Numb are required for EAAT3
endocytosis. (A) Cartoon showing the procedure of the
EAAT3–antibody internalization assay.CRL1601 cells were transfected
with the plasmid expressing EAAT3 containing a 3×Flag tag in the
extracellular domain. Cells were incubated with theanti-Flag
antibody for 1 h at 4°C, allowing the binding of the antibody to
cell surface Flag–EAAT3. Cells were then washed and shifted to 37°C
to initiate theendocytosis of theEAAT3–antibodycomplex.At the
indicated timepoints, cellswerewashedwith thestrippingbuffer,
fixed, permeabilizedandexaminedbyconfocalmicroscopy. (B)
Internalization of the EAAT3–antibody complex in CRL1601 cells
transfected with Flag–EAAT3(WT) or Flag–EAAT3(3A) (red) at
different chasetimes. Scale bar: 10 μm. (C)Quantification of the
fluorescence intensityof intracellular EAAT3–antibody complex for
theexperiments shown inB.Data are presentedas mean±s.d., n=100,
from three independent experiments. ***P
-
AcknowledgementsWe are grateful to Paul A. Welling (University
of Maryland School of Medicine,Baltimore, MD) for ARH-, Dab2- and
GULP-expressing plasmids.
Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing or financial
interests.
Author contributionsB.-L.S., J.L. and Z.-P.X. conceived the
project. J.-F.S., J.W., P.-S.L., B.-L.L., B.-L.S.,J.L. and Z.-P.X.
designed the experiments and organized the data. J.-F.S.performed
the experiments and analyzed the data. H.-H.M., Y.-C.M., Y.-X.Q.,
J.X.and J.Q. contributed stable cell lines and plasmid
construction. J.-F.S., B.-L.S., andJ.L. wrote the manuscript. All
authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
FundingThis work was supported by the grants from the Ministry
of Science and Technologyof the People’s Republic of China [grant
numbers 2014DFG32410,2016YFA0500100]; National Natural Science
Foundation of China [grant numbers31430044, 31230020, 81270155];
the Opening Project of Shanghai Key Laboratoryof Complex
Prescription (Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese
Medicine)[grant number 14DZ2271000] the Natural Science Foundation
of Hubei Province[grant number 2015CFB215]; and the Fundamental
Research Funds for the CentralUniversities [grant number
2042015kf0026].
Supplementary informationSupplementary information available
online
athttp://jcs.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/jcs.185496.supplemental
ReferencesAmara, S. G. and Fontana, A. C. F. (2002). Excitatory
amino acid transporters:keeping up with glutamate. Neurochem. Int.
41, 313-318.
Bailey, C. G., Ryan, R. M., Thoeng, A. D., Ng, C., King, K.,
Vanslambrouck, J. M.,Auray-Blais, C., Vandenberg, R. J., Bröer, S.
and Rasko, J. E. (2011). Loss-of-function mutations in the
glutamate transporter SLC1A1 cause humandicarboxylic aminoaciduria.
J. Clin. Invest. 121, 446-453.
Bianchi, M. G., Bardelli, D., Chiu, M. and Bussolati, O. (2014).
Changes in theexpression of the glutamate transporter EAAT3/EAAC1
in health and disease.Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71, 2001-2015.
Chen, W. J., Goldstein, J. L. and Brown, M. S. (1990). NPXY, a
sequence oftenfound in cytoplasmic tails, is required for coated
pit-mediated internalization of thelow density lipoprotein
receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 25, 3116-3123.
Cheng, C., Glover, G., Banker, G. andAmara, S. G. (2002). A
novel sorting motif inthe glutamate transporter excitatory amino
acid transporter 3 directs its targeting inMadin-Darby canine
kidney cells and hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci.
22,10643-10652.
Conti, F., DeBiasi, S., Minelli, A., Rothstein, J. D. andMelone,
M. (1998). EAAC1,a high-affinity glutamate tranporter, is localized
to astrocytes and gabaergicneurons besides pyramidal cells in the
rat cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 8,108-116.
D’Amico, A., Soragna, A., Di Cairano, E., Panzeri, N., Anzai,
N., Vellea Sacchi, F.and Perego, C. (2010). The surface density of
the glutamate transporter EAAC1 iscontrolled by interactions with
PDZK1 and AP2 adaptor complexes. Traffic 11,1455-1470.
Danbolt, N. C. (2001). Glutamate uptake. Prog. Neurobiol. 65,
1-105.Davis, K. E., Straff, D. J., Weinstein, E. A., Bannerman, P.
G., Correale, D. M.,Rothstein, J. D. and Robinson, M. B. (1998).
Multiple signaling pathwaysregulate cell surface expression and
activity of the excitatory amino acid carrier 1subtype of Glu
transporter in C6 glioma. J. Neurosci. 18, 2475-2485.
Fournier, K. M. andRobinson,M. B. (2006). A dominant-negative
variant of SNAP-23 decreases the cell surface expression of the
neuronal glutamate transporterEAAC1 by slowing constitutive
delivery. Neurochem. Int. 48, 596-603.
Fournier, K. M., Gonzalez, M. I. and Robinson, M. B. (2004).
Rapid trafficking ofthe neuronal glutamate transporter, EAAC1:
evidence for distinct traffickingpathways differentially regulated
by protein kinase C and platelet-derived growthfactor. J. Biol.
Chem. 279, 34505-34513.
Ge, L., Qi, W., Wang, L.-J., Miao, H.-H., Qu, Y.-X., Li, B.-L.
and Song, B.-L. (2011).Flotillins play an essential role in
Niemann-Pick C1-like 1-mediated cholesteroluptake. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 108, 551-556.
Gonzalez, M. I., Kazanietz, M. G. and Robinson, M. B. (2002).
Regulation of theneuronal glutamate transporter excitatory amino
acid carrier-1 (EAAC1) bydifferent protein kinase C subtypes. Mol.
Pharmacol. 62, 901-910.
Gonzalez, M. I., Krizman-Genda, E. and Robinson, M. B. (2007a).
Caveolin-1regulates the delivery and endocytosis of the glutamate
transporter, excitatoryamino acid carrier 1. J. Biol. Chem. 282,
29855-29865.
González, M. I., Susarla, B. T. S., Fournier, K. M., Sheldon,
A. L. and Robinson,M. B. (2007b). Constitutive endocytosis and
recycling of the neuronal glutamatetransporter, excitatory amino
acid carrier 1. J. Neurochem. 103, 1917-1931.
Guillet, B. A., Velly, L. J., Canolle, B., Masmejean, F. M.,
Nieoullon, A. L. andPisano, P. (2005). Differential regulation by
protein kinases of activity and cellsurface expression of glutamate
transporters in neuron-enriched cultures.Neurochem. Int. 46,
337-346.
Huang, Y. and Zuo, Z. (2005). Isoflurane induces a protein
kinase C alpha-dependent increase in cell-surface protein level and
activity of glutamatetransporter type 3. Mol. Pharmacol. 67,
1522-1533.
Huang, Y., Feng, X., Sando, J. J. and Zuo, Z. (2006). Critical
role of serine 465 inisoflurane-induced increase of cell-surface
redistribution and activity of glutamatetransporter type 3. J.
Biol. Chem. 281, 38133-38138.
Johnson, K. F., Chan, W. and Kornfeld, S. (1990).
Cation-dependent mannose 6-phosphate receptor contains two
internalization signals in its cytoplasmic domain.Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 87, 10010-10014.
Kanai, Y. and Hediger, M. A. (1992). Primary structure and
functionalcharacterization of a high-affinity glutamate
transporter. Nature 360, 467-471.
Kugler, P. and Schmitt, A. (1999). Glutamate transporter EAAC1
is expressed inneurons and glial cells in the rat nervous system.
Glia 27, 129-142.
Kyriazis, G. A., Wei, Z., Vandermey, M., Jo, D.-G., Xin, O.,
Mattson, M. P. andChan, S. L. (2008). Numb endocytic adapter
proteins regulate the transport andprocessing of the amyloid
precursor protein in an isoform-dependent manner:implications for
Alzheimer disease pathogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 283,25492-25502.
Li, P. S., Fu, Z. Y., Zhang, Y. Y., Zhang, J. H., Xu, C. Q., Ma,
Y. T., Li, B. L. andSong, B. L. (2014). The clathrin adaptor Numb
regulates intestinal cholesterolabsorption through dynamic
interaction with NPC1L1. Nat. Med. 20, 80-86.
Lortet, S., Canolle, B., Masmejean, F. and Nieoullon, A. (2008).
Plasmamembrane expression of the neuronal glutamate transporter
EAAC1 isregulated by glial factors: evidence for different
regulatory pathways associatedwith neuronal maturation. Neurochem.
Int. 52, 1373-1382.
Maldonado-Báez, L. and Wendland, B. (2006). Endocytic adaptors:
recruiters,coordinators and regulators. Trends Cell Biol. 16,
505-513.
Maurer, M. E. and Cooper, J. A. (2006). The adaptor protein Dab2
sorts LDLreceptors into coated pits independently of AP-2 and ARH.
J. Cell Sci. 119,4235-4246.
McGill, M. A., Dho, S. E., Weinmaster, G. and McGlade, C. J.
(2009). Numbregulates post-endocytic trafficking and degradation of
Notch1. J. Biol. Chem.284, 26427-26438.
Najimi, M., Maloteaux, J. -M. and Hermans, E. (2002).
Cytoskeleton-relatedtrafficking of the EAAC1 glutamate transporter
after activation of the G(q/11)-coupled neurotensin receptor NTS1.
FEBS Lett. 523, 224-228.
Nieoullon, A., Canolle, B., Masmejean, F., Guillet, B., Pisano,
P. and Lortet, S.(2006). The neuronal excitatory amino acid
transporter EAAC1/EAAT3: does itrepresent a major actor at the
brain excitatory synapse? J. Neurochem. 98,1007-1018.
Nishimura, T. and Kaibuchi, K. (2007). Numb controls integrin
endocytosis fordirectional cell migration with aPKC and PAR-3. Dev.
Cell 13, 15-28.
Santolini, E., Puri, C., Salcini, A. E., Gagliani, M. C.,
Pelicci, P. G., Tacchetti, C.and Di Fiore, P. P. (2000). Numb is an
endocytic protein. J. Cell Biol. 151,1345-1352.
Sato, K., Watanabe, T., Wang, S., Kakeno, M., Matsuzawa, K.,
Matsui, T., Yokoi,K., Murase, K., Sugiyama, I., Ozawa, M. et al.
(2011). Numb controls E-cadherinendocytosis through p120 catenin
with aPKC. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 3103-3119.
Schlüter, T., Knauth, P.,Wald, S., Boland, S. andBohnensack, R.
(2009). Numb3is an endocytosis adaptor for the inflammatory marker
P-selectin. Biochem.Biophys. Res. Commun. 379, 909-913.
Shayakul, C., Kanai, Y., Lee, W. S., Brown, D., Rothstein, J. D.
and Hediger,M. A. (1997). Localization of the high-affinity
glutamate transporter EAAC1 in ratkidney. Am. J. Physiol. 273,
F1023-F1029.
Sheldon, A. L., Gonzalez, M. I. and Robinson, M. B. (2006). A
carboxyl-terminal determinant of the neuronal glutamate
transporter, EAAC1, is required forplatelet-derived growth
factor-dependent trafficking. J. Biol. Chem. 281,4876-4886.
Sims, K. D., Straff, D. J. andRobinson,M. B. (2000).
Platelet-derived growth factorrapidly increases activity and cell
surface expression of the EAAC1 subtype ofglutamate transporter
through activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. J. Biol.Chem.
275, 5228-5237.
Sirinian, M. I., Belleudi, F., Campagna, F., Ceridono, M.,
Garofalo, T.,Quagliarini, F., Verna, R., Calandra, S., Bertolini,
S., Sorice, M. et al. (2005).Adaptor protein ARH is recruited to
the plasma membrane by low densitylipoprotein (LDL) binding and
modulates endocytosis of the LDL/LDL receptorcomplex in
hepatocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 38416-38423.
Su, H. P., Nakada-Tsukui, K., Tosello-Trampont, A.-C., Li, Y.,
Bu, G., Henson,P. M. and Ravichandran, K. S. (2002). Interaction of
CED-6/GULP, anadapter protein involved in engulfment of apoptotic
cells with CED-1 and CD91/low density lipoprotein receptor-related
protein (LRP). J. Biol. Chem. 277,11772-11779.
Uhlik, M. T., Temple, B., Bencharit, S., Kimple, A. J.,
Siderovski, D. P. andJohnson, G. L. (2005). Structural and
evolutionary division of phosphotyrosinebinding (PTB) domains. J.
Mol. Biol. 345, 1-20.
3113
RESEARCH ARTICLE Journal of Cell Science (2016) 129, 3104-3114
doi:10.1242/jcs.185496
Journal
ofCe
llScience
http://jcs.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/jcs.185496.supplementalhttp://jcs.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/jcs.185496.supplementalhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0197-0186(02)00018-9http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0197-0186(02)00018-9http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI44474http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI44474http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI44474http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI44474http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-013-1484-0http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-013-1484-0http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-013-1484-0http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/8.2.108http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/8.2.108http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/8.2.108http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/8.2.108http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01110.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01110.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01110.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01110.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082(00)00067-8http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2005.12.030http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2005.12.030http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2005.12.030http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M404032200http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M404032200http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M404032200http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M404032200http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014434108http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014434108http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014434108http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/mol.62.4.901http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/mol.62.4.901http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/mol.62.4.901http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M704738200http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M704738200http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M704738200http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04881.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04881.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04881.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2004.10.006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2004.10.006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2004.10.006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2004.10.006http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/mol.104.007443http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/mol.104.007443http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/mol.104.007443http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M603885200http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M603885200http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M603885200http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.24.10010http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.24.10010http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.24.10010http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/360467a0http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/360467a0http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199908)27:2
-
Wei, J., Fu, Z.-Y., Li, P.-S., Miao, H.-H., Li, B.-L., Ma, Y.-T.
and Song, B.-L. (2014).
The clathrin adaptor proteins ARH, Dab2, and numb play distinct
roles in
Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 versus low density lipoprotein
receptor-mediated
cholesterol uptake. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 33689-33700.Yang, W. and
Kilberg, M. S. (2002). Biosynthesis, intracellular targeting,
and
degradation of the EAAC1 glutamate/aspartate transporter in C6
glioma cells.
J. Biol. Chem. 277, 38350-38357.
Yap, C. C. and Winckler, B. (2015). Adapting for endocytosis:
roles for endocyticsorting adaptors in directing neural
development. Front. Cell Neurosci. 9, 119.
Yu, Y.-X., Shen, L., Xia, P., Tang, Y.-W., Bao, L. and Pei, G.
(2006). Syntaxin 1Apromotes the endocytic sorting of EAAC1 leading
to inhibition of glutamatetransport. J. Cell Sci. 119,
3776-3787.
Zhou, P., Alfaro, J., Chang, E. H., Zhao, X., Porcionatto, M.
and Segal, R. A.(2011). Numb links extracellular cues to
intracellular polarity machinery to promotechemotaxis. Dev. Cell
20, 610-622.
3114
RESEARCH ARTICLE Journal of Cell Science (2016) 129, 3104-3114
doi:10.1242/jcs.185496
Journal
ofCe
llScience
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.593764http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.593764http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.593764http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.593764http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M202052200http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M202052200http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M202052200http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00119http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00119http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.03151http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.03151http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.03151http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.04.006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.04.006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.04.006
/ColorImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict >
/JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false
/CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 150
/GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true
/GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 200
/GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2
/GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.32000 /EncodeGrayImages true
/GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true
/GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict >
/GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict >
/JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false
/CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 400
/MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true
/MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 600
/MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.00000
/EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode
/MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None
] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false
/PDFXNoTrimBoxError false /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 34.69606
34.27087 34.69606 34.27087 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox false
/PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 8.50394 8.50394 8.50394 8.50394 ]
/PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier ()
/PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped
/False
/CreateJDFFile false /Description > /Namespace [ (Adobe)
(Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ > /FormElements false
/GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks
false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false
/IncludeProfiles false /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings
/Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ]
/PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PreserveEditing
true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling
/UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ]>>
setdistillerparams> setpagedevice