Top Banner
THE EXTENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND PARTICIPATION OF THE STAFF NURSES ON THE VISUAL INFUSION PHLEBITIS PROGRAM OF SAINT ANTHONY COLLEGE HOSPITAL
89
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: NRES

THE EXTENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND PARTICIPATION OF THE

STAFF NURSES ON THE VISUAL INFUSION PHLEBITIS PROGRAM OF

SAINT ANTHONY COLLEGE HOSPITAL

THE EXTENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND PARTICIPATION OF THE

STAFF NURSES ON THE VISUAL INFUSION PHLEBITIS PROGRAM OF

SAINT ANTHONY COLLEGE HOSPITAL

Page 2: NRES

CHAPTER 1THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUNDTHE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

Page 3: NRES

Statement Statement of the of the

ProblemProblem

Page 4: NRES

The main concern of this study is to determine the extent of knowledge and participation of the staff nurses towards visual infusion phlebitis at Saint. Anthony College Hospital during the year 2012.

Page 5: NRES

Specifically, this Specifically, this study will seek to study will seek to

answer the following answer the following questions:questions:

Page 6: NRES

1. What is the demographic profile of the staff nurses of St. Anthony Hospital in terms of age, sex, highest educational attainment, length of service, and position?

2. What is Visual Infusion Phlebitis Program?

Page 7: NRES

3. What is the extent of knowledge of the staff nurses towards visual infusion phlebitis program?

4. What is the extent of participation of the staff nurses towards visual infusion phlebitis program?

Page 8: NRES

5. Is there a significant difference in the extent of knowledge of the staff nurses towards visual infusion phlebitis program when grouped according to age, sex, highest educational attainment, length of service, and position?

Page 9: NRES

6. Is there a significant difference in the extent of participation of the staff nurses towards visual infusion phlebitis program when grouped according to age, sex, highest educational attainment, length of service, and position?

Page 10: NRES

7. Is there a significant relationship between the extent of knowledge and extent of participation of the staff nurses towards the visual infusion phlebitis program?

Page 11: NRES

Hypotheses of the Study

Page 12: NRES

A hypothesis is a specific statement of prediction. It describes in concrete (rather than theoretical) terms what you expect will happen in your study. Not all studies have hypotheses.

Page 13: NRES

Sometimes a study is designed to be exploratory. There is no formal hypothesis, and perhaps the purpose of the study is to explore some area more thoroughly in order to develop some specific hypothesis or prediction that can be tested in future research.

Page 14: NRES

A single study may have one

or many hypotheses.

Page 15: NRES

1. There is no significant difference in the extent of knowledge of the staff nurses towards visual infusion phlebitis when grouped according to age, sex, highest educational attainment, length of service, and position.

Page 16: NRES

2. There is no significant difference in the extent of participation of the staff nurses towards visual infusion phlebitis when grouped according to age, sex, highest educational attainment, length of service, and position.

Page 17: NRES

3. There is no significant relationship between the extent of knowledge and extent of participation of the staff nurses towards the visual infusion program?

Page 18: NRES

CHAPTER 2REVIEW OF RELATED

LITERATURE AND STUDIESREVIEW OF RELATED

LITERATURE AND STUDIES

Page 19: NRES

This chapter consists of information culled from related legal basis, literature, studies and synthesis, from which this particular study is premised.  This will certainly help in giving the reader a better understanding of what visual infusion phlebitis program is.

Page 20: NRES

Related Legal Basis

Page 21: NRES

Good infection prevention and control are essential to ensure that people who use health and social care services receive safe and effective care. Effective prevention and control of infection must be part of everyday practice and be applied consistently by everyone.

Page 22: NRES

Good management and organisational processes are crucial to make sure that high standards of infection prevention and control are developed and maintained.

Page 23: NRES

This document sets out the Code of Practice on the prevention and control of infections, under The Health and Social Care Act 2008. It will apply to registered providers of all healthcare and adult social care in England. The Code of Practice (Part 2) sets out the 10 criteria against which the Care Quality Commission (CQC) will judge a registered provider on how it complies with the cleanliness and infection control requirement, which is set out in regulations.

Page 24: NRES

1 Not all criteria will apply to every regulated activity but to ensure that consistently high levels of infection prevention and control are developed and maintained, it is essential that all providers of health and social care read and consider the whole document and not just selective parts.

1 Not all criteria will apply to every regulated activity but to ensure that consistently high levels of infection prevention and control are developed and maintained, it is essential that all providers of health and social care read and consider the whole document and not just selective parts.

Page 25: NRES

Parts 3 and 4 of this document will help registered providers interpret the criteria and develop their own risk assessments. The appendices provide examples of how a proportionate approach could be applied to the criteria in all sectors and it is important to read the examples given in the appendices, alongside the guidance under each criterion in Part 3 of this document. The bibliography lists a range of supporting national guidance.

Parts 3 and 4 of this document will help registered providers interpret the criteria and develop their own risk assessments. The appendices provide examples of how a proportionate approach could be applied to the criteria in all sectors and it is important to read the examples given in the appendices, alongside the guidance under each criterion in Part 3 of this document. The bibliography lists a range of supporting national guidance.

Page 26: NRES

Synthesis of the Study

Page 27: NRES

Of 300 patients, 145 (48.3%) were male and 155 (51.7%) were female. Mean (± standard deviation) age of patients was 51.8 (± 22.5) years. 56.3% were younger than 60 years old. Catheters were inserted for reasons such as administration of fluids, intravenous drugs and blood products.

Page 28: NRES

Catheter gauge size was 20 in 190 patients, 18 in 109 patients, and 22 in one patient. 287catheters were inserted in the upper extremities and 13in the lower extremities. Catheter insertion was urgent in 140 patients and elective in 160 patients. Phlebitis occurred in 26% (95% CI 21–31).

Page 29: NRES

There was no significant relationship between age, size of catheter, trauma and phlebitis (Table Ι). The incidence of phlebitis in females and males was 31% and 20.7%, respectively. 57.7% of diabetic patients and 7.4% of non-diabetics developed phlebitis. Independent risk factors associated with phlebitis were gender, site and type of catheter insertion, diabetes mellitus, infectious diseases and burns.

Page 30: NRES

The control group and 33 in the case group were included in the evaluation. Twelve patients in the control group out of 48 (25%) and 11 out of the 44 (25%)patients in the case group were excluded because their IV cannula were removed in less than 24 hours or the patients were discharged before the investigator was able to assess the IV site.

Page 31: NRES

. Subject characteristics for both groups were similar with respect to sex although there in terms of age, there were more subjects in the 1 to 12 months age group among the control. For both control and case group, the locations of the IV insertions had almost similar distribution and most were done in the hand. Final result had shown that 8 out of the 36 (22%) subjects in the control group developed phlebitis as compared to the case group in whom 4 out of the 33 (12%) subjects had phlebitis.

Page 32: NRES

Dwell time, The average dwell time for subjects in the control group is 62.9 hours (SD 30.3 hours) as compared to the case group with average dwell time of 62.8 hours (SD 30.4). If subjects whom IV cannula were electively removed or those whom cannulation where removed because they were no longer need for were excluded,the average dwell time became 62.7 hours (SD 29.9) forthe control and 65 hours (SD 27.6) for the case group.

Page 33: NRES

Of the total of 12 patients who had phlebitis, 5 had their cannula in place for 24-48 hours, 3 of them for 49-72 hours, 2 for 73-96 hours while 2 had their cannula in place for 145-168 hours. Of the 12 patients in the control group who developed phlebitis, 8 were given IV fluids while 4 had heparin lock.

Page 34: NRES

Eight were given IV antibiotics while 3 were given blood products. There could be several attempts in IV insertion in a subject and a cannula could be used several times by the intern or the residents before a successful cannulation. Majority of IV insertion fortunately was successful on first . Seven out of 51 of those who developed phlebitis had the IV cannula used only once in an attempt.

Page 35: NRES

There were 2 subjects whose cannula was used 4 times but did not developed phlebitis. Type of Personnel performing the cannulation, in PGH pediatric wards and emergency room, the interns were the first in line who should perform the IV insertion, thus 70% (36/53) of the IV insertion were performed by the interns while the rest were done by the residents. Seven out of the 36 insertions done by the interns developed phlebitis while 4 out of the 18 insertions done by the residents had phlebitis.

Page 36: NRES

CHAPTER IIIRESEARCH DESIGN

AND METHODOLOGYRESEARCH DESIGN

AND METHODOLOGY

Page 37: NRES

This chapter deals with the research design, research locale, respondents of the study, research instruments, validity of the questionnaire, reliability of the questionnaire, statistical analysis of data, statistical tool.

Page 38: NRES

Research Design

Page 39: NRES

The Descriptive research design will be employed in this study. According to David (2005), this particular design is appropriate for collecting descriptive information about a population or subjects of the study. According to Travers (1984), this research design describes the present existing conditions. It involves the collection of data in order to test hypotheses or to answer questions concerning the current status of the subjects under study.

Page 40: NRES

This research design is deemed appropriate for this particular study because the main concern was to determine the extent of knowledge and participation of the staff nurses towards visual infusion phlebitis at St. Anthony College Hospital.

Page 41: NRES

Research Locale

Page 42: NRES

The study was conducted at Saint Anthony College (Hospital) at San Roque Ext., Roxas City, Capiz, Philippines. The study covered 171 staff nurses as respondents during the year 2012-2013. 

Page 43: NRES

Respondents of the Study

Page 44: NRES

This study will utilize 171 staff nurses of St. Anthony College Hospital as respondents. This is a population study.

Page 45: NRES

The distribution of the staff nurses-respondents is presented in table 1.

Page 46: NRES

Ward Population Percent

Immaculate Heart Of Mary 18 10.52

St. Catherine Laboure 13 7.5

Rosalie Rendu 1313 7.57.5

Surgical 77 4.094.09

Service 77 4.094.09

St. Joseph 1313 7.57.5

Mother Baby Friendly 44 2.332.33

Nino De Praga 88 4.674.67

Medical 1313 7.57.5

Emergency Room 1212 7.017.01

Intensive Care Unit 2424 14.0314.03

Operating Room /Delivery Room 2020 11.611.6

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit 99 5.265.26

Dialysis 44 2.332.33

Dots 11 0.580.58

Opd 11 0.580.58

Floater 44 2.332.33

Special Care 11 0.580.58

TOTAL 171171 100%100%

Table 1.Respondents of the Study

Page 47: NRES

Research Instrument

Page 48: NRES

The data needed for the study will be gathered with the use of the Self-administered nurse-respondents questionnaire. The questionnaire for the respondents will be made up of three parts.

Page 49: NRES

Part I is on the demographic profile of the respondents, part II is on the extent of knowledge of the staff nurses towards visual infusion phlebitis, and part III is on the extent of participation of the staff nurses towards visual infusion phlebitis. The part II and III of the questionnaire will be made up of 25 statements each.

Page 50: NRES

The research instrument will be subjected to the content validity and reliability testing. This will be subjected to pivotal or trial run to thirty (30) staff nurses of Capiz Doctor’s Hospital to check flaws in the items and in the instructions. The pretest respondents will not be included in the actual survey.

Page 51: NRES

Validity of the Questionnaire

Page 52: NRES

The questionnaire will be subjected to face validation zeroing on its content. The validators are members of the faculty of Saint Anthony College of Roxas City who are considered experts. 

Page 53: NRES

Reliability of the Questionnaire

Page 54: NRES

To test the reliability of the questionnaire, this will be subjected to a pre-test. It will be administered to thirty (30) staff nurses of Capiz Doctor’s Hospital who will be chosen at convenience and will not participate in the actual survey. Only thirty (30) staff nurses will be used in the reliability testing because according to Garrett, this number is adequate enough.

Page 55: NRES

Data from the pre-test will be tabulated and the reliability coefficient will be computed using the split-half method. The items in every part of the questionnaire will be split into odd and even numbers. The results of the odd-numbered items are correlated with that of the even-numbered items.

Page 56: NRES

The Spearman Rank The Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient Correlation Coefficient will be used to determine will be used to determine the reliability coefficient the reliability coefficient of one half of the of one half of the questionnaire: (Downie, questionnaire: (Downie, 1984)1984)

Page 57: NRES

= 1-6 ΣD2

N (N2-1)

Where: =

ΣD2 = sum of the squares of the differenceN = number of paired scorer

Is the reliability coefficient of

one-half of the questionnaire

Page 58: NRES

 

To get the reliability coefficient of the whole questionnaire, the Spearman Brown Prophecy formula will be used: (Garrett, 1971)

Page 59: NRES

2 r ½ 1/11

1 + r ½ 1/11rll =

Page 60: NRES

Where:

½ 1/11 = reliability coefficient of one-half of the

questionnaire

rll = reliability coefficient of the whole

questionnairer

Page 61: NRES

As recommended by our statistician, to counter-check the reliability of the questionnaire, the reliability coefficient will again be computed using the Cronbach Alpha. Cronbach Alpha measures how well a set of items or variables measures a single unidimensional latent construct.

Page 62: NRES

When data have a multidimensional structure, Cronbach Alpha is usually low. Technically, Cronbach Alpha is a coefficient of reliability or consistency. (SPSS FAQ, http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/spss/modules/default.htm).

Page 63: NRES

Cronbach Alpha can be written as a function of the number of test items and the average inter-correlation among the items:

N . r

1 + ( N – 1 ) . ra =

Page 64: NRES

Where:

N = number of items

r = average inter-item correlation among the items.

Page 65: NRES

According to Milton Smith, a reliability coefficient of 0.80 or more but not more than 1.0 is

necessary for the whole questionnaire to be reliable.

Page 66: NRES

Statistical Statistical Analysis of Analysis of

DataData

Page 67: NRES

The data gathered will be processed manually because its bulk is manually manageable. To facilitate analysis, the raw data will be scored using the following scoring guide as basis:

Page 68: NRES

The items in the instrument on the extent of knowledge and participation of the staff nurses towards visual infusion phlebitis will be scored as follows:

Page 69: NRES

Extent of Knowledge:

Page 70: NRES

Response Category

PositiveItem

NegativeItem

ScoreInterval

VerbalInterpretation

Strongly agree5.00

5 1 4.45 – Very Knowledgeable

Agree4.44

4 2 3.45 – Knowledgeable

Uncertain3.44

3 3 2.45 – Moderately Knowledgeable

Disagree2.44

2 4 1.45 – Least Knowledgeable

Strongly Disagree 1 5 1.0 – 1.44 NotKnowledgeable

Page 71: NRES

Extent of Participation:

Page 72: NRES

Response Positive Negative Score Verbal

Category Item Item Interval Interpretation

Strongly agree 5 1 4.45 – 5.00 Very

Knowledgeable

Agree 4 2 3.45 – 4.44 Knowledgeable

Uncertain 3 3 2.45 – 3.44 Moderately

Knowledgeable

Disagree 2 4 1.45 – 2.44 Least

Knowledgeable

Strongly

Disagree1 5 1.0 – 1.44 Not

Knowledgeable

Page 73: NRES

Statistical Tools

Page 74: NRES

The gathered data will be analyzed with the use of the following statistical tools: frequency count, mean, percentage, t-test, F-test, and pearson product-moment correlation coefficient.

Page 75: NRES

The researchers will use the frequency count and the mean to know the extent of knowledge and participation of the staff nurses towards visual infusion phlebitis. The mean formula is: (Downie, 1984)

Page 76: NRES

XNX =

Where:

X = is is the meanX = sum sum of scoresN= number number of respondents

Page 77: NRES

To find out whether or not there is a significant difference in the extent of knowledge and participation of the staff nurses towards visual infusion phlebitis when grouped according to sex, the t-test will be used. The formula is: (Downie, 1984)

Page 78: NRES

t = X1 - X2

S.E.D.X

Page 79: NRES

Where:t = is the t-valueX1 1 = mean mean of the first

variableX2 2 = meanmean of the

secondvariableS.E.D.X = standard standard error of

the difference between raw means

Page 80: NRES

To determine whether or not there is significant difference in the extent of knowledge and participation of the staff nurses towards visual infusion phlebitis when grouped according to age, highest educational attainment, length of service, and position, the F-test will be used. The formula is: (Downie, 1984)

Page 81: NRES

Mean square between

Mean square withinF=

Page 82: NRES

To determine the significant relationship between the extent of knowledge and extent of participation of the staff nurses towards the visual infusion program, the researchers used the Pearson Product – Moment Correlation Coefficient. The formula is: (Downie, 1984)

Page 83: NRES

r =S1

2 + S22 - Sd

2

2 √ S12 √ S2

2

Page 84: NRES

where :

r -

Pearson - r valueS1

2 = variance of the first variable

S22= variance of the second variable

Sd2 = variance of the difference

between two variables

Page 85: NRES

Result of the computation will be interpreted using the following scales with their corresponding Interpretations:

Page 86: NRES

0.00 to + 0.20 denotes indifferent or negligible relationship;+ 0.20 to + 0.40 denotes low relationship presents but slight;+ 0.40 to + 0.70 denotes marked or substantial relationship;+ 0.70 to + 1.00 denotes high to very high relationship.

Page 87: NRES

The significance of the relationship will be determined by comparing the computed value of “ “ with the tabular value of ” “ for N-2 degrees of freedom and 5 percent level of significance.

The significance of the relationship will be determined by comparing the computed value of “ “ with the tabular value of ” “ for N-2 degrees of freedom and 5 percent level of significance.

r r

Page 88: NRES

END….

Page 89: NRES

By:

ARIENNE A. ASTROLOGIA

DISYME D. AZURES

AERIEL FAYE V.

BERGANTINOS

WINGIE D. BUDAY