Npm Report

8/8/2019 Npm Report

1/21

New Public

ManagementPresented by:

Ethel N. MendiolaUlysses Quinton

Dada Villanueva

PA 201 Class, UP-NCPAG

8/8/2019 Npm Report

2/21

Presentation Outline

I. What is NPM?

II. Emergence of NPM

Evolution from Traditional to NPM

8/8/2019 Npm Report

3/21

8/8/2019 Npm Report

4/21

Core Principles of NPM(Osborne and Gaebler, 1992)

CORE

PRINCIPLES

INTENDED OUTCOMES

Steer, ratherthan row

Greater flexibility Concentration on overall mission

Greater willingness to experimentand focus on comprehensive

solutions to problems

8/8/2019 Npm Report

5/21

Core Principles of NPM(Osborne and Gaebler, 1992)

CORE PRINCIPLES INTENDED OUTCOMES

Empower

communities tosolve their own

problems

a greater understanding of the community's

real problems

a tendency to tackle and solve problems ratherthan just deliver services

the provision of care and not just service

a greater degree of flexibility and creativity

lower cost

more effective enforcement of standards ofbehaviour(which is really an adjunct to caring)

a tendency to focus on capacities rather than

to respond to deficiencies.

8/8/2019 Npm Report

6/21

Core Principles of NPM(Osborne and Gaebler, 1992)

CORE PRINCIPLES INTENDED OUTCOMES

Promote and

encouragecompetition rather

than monopolies

greater efficiency and value for money

pressure on monopolies to consider andrespond to the customers needs

innovation is valued and rewarded

increased pride and morale of publicsector

8/8/2019 Npm Report

7/21

Core Principles of NPM(Osborne and Gaebler, 1992)

CORE PRINCIPLES INTENDED OUTCOMES

Be driven by

mission rather thanrules

elimination of outdated and

unnecessary rules and regulations flexibility of budgets

transformation from conventionalto a more supportive civil servicce

8/8/2019 Npm Report

8/21

Core Principles of NPM(Osborne and Gaebler, 1992)

CORE PRINCIPLES INTENDED OUTCOMES

Be results-oriented

by fundingoutcomes rather

than inputs

Promotes improved performance

focus on successful programs andreward success

potential to gain communitysupport by demonstrating

successful programs

8/8/2019 Npm Report

9/21

Core Principles of NPM(Osborne and Gaebler, 1992)

CORE PRINCIPLES INTENDED OUTCOMES

Meet the needs of

customers ratherthan those of the

bureaucracy

more accessible government

services

8/8/2019 Npm Report

10/21

Core Principles of NPM(Osborne and Gaebler, 1992)

CORE PRINCIPLES INTENDED OUTCOMES

Concentrate on

earning moneyrather than just

spending it

long-term view toward

outlays develops goal-oriented publicsector managers

8/8/2019 Npm Report

11/21

Core Principles of NPM(Osborne and Gaebler, 1992)

CORE PRINCIPLES INTENDED OUTCOMES

Invest in preventing

problems ratherthan in curing

crises

Adoption of longer-term view

of planning to anticipateproblems that could emerge

8/8/2019 Npm Report

12/21

Core Principles of NPM(Osborne and Gaebler, 1992)

CORE PRINCIPLES INTENDED OUTCOMES

Decentralize

authority rather

than build

hierarchies

More flexible in responding to

local needs More effective problem-solving

More innovative in service delivery

Generation of high-morale,

commitment and productivity HIERARCHYis replaced withACCOUNTABILITY

8/8/2019 Npm Report

13/21

Core Principles of NPM(Osborne and Gaebler, 1992)

CORE PRINCIPLES INTENDED OUTCOMES

Solve problems by

influencing market

forces rather than by

creating public programs

Desired results are

produced throughleverage and marketintervention

8/8/2019 Npm Report

14/21

The PUBLIC CHOICE THEORY

3Es plus RELEVANCE, CLIENT-ORIENTEDNESSAND EQUITY(Pilar)

Adopted strategies of people participation, socialaccess and participative governance

Public Service Values:

o Administrative and political accountability

o Nationalism and Good Governance

o Public-Private Partnership in Poverty Alleviation

Focus: RESULTS (Hughes)

8/8/2019 Npm Report

15/21

The PUBLIC CHOICE THEORY

8/8/2019 Npm Report

16/21

PROBLEMS CONFRONTING

PA IN RP

BLOATED CIVIL SERVICE

As of 2009, a total of 1.445 million personnel wereemployed in government.

65 percent of all government employees are assignedto national government agencies and only 27 percentto LGUs.

35 percent - 40 percent of the national governmentexpenditures are channeled to personnel services

8/8/2019 Npm Report

17/21

PROBLEMS CONFRONTING

PA IN RP

PROBLEMS IN PRIVATIZATION

resulted in higher costs in the delivery ofservices offered by this privatized corporations.

Fiscal deficit problems from debt incurred by

GOCCso Budget Deficit (2005): P146.5 B

o National Debt: $72 B or 79% of GDP

8/8/2019 Npm Report

18/21

PROBLEMS CONFRONTING

PA IN RP

DETERIORATING INVESTMENT CLIMATE

Causes:

weakness of the legal and regulatory framework limited recourses available to resolve disputes

high level of political intervention in thecommercial sector

Greater cost of power and labor as opposed toother neighboring countries in the region

CORRUPTION

8/8/2019 Npm Report

19/21

PROBLEMS CONFRONTING

PA IN RP

PROBLEMATIC CONDUCT OF ELECTIONS

Election fraud

Absence of modernized election system

8/8/2019 Npm Report

20/21

NPM in the Philippines

The role of technical consultants in the formulation ofreform interventions led to the introduction of someNPM concept in the Philippines.

many of the NPM inspired reform initiatives in thePhilippines are hastened by the presence of ITinfrastructures

structural adjustment programs of multilateral lendinginstitutions like the World Bank, ADB and theInternational Monetary Fund (IMF) have contributed tothe growth of NPM in the Philippines.

8/8/2019 Npm Report

21/21

Di

d NPM lead tobetter governance?