nSfud lkef;d vfHkKrk lsok A Daily Current Awareness Service lekpkj i=k s a ls pf;r va 'k Newspapers Clippings j{kk foKku iqLrdky; Defence Science Library j{kk oSKkfud lwpuk ,oa Áy¢[ku d¢Uæ Defence Scientific Information & Documentation Centre esVdkWQ gkÅl] fnYyh 110054 Metcalfe House, Delhi-110054
12
Embed
NPC-13 Nov, 2016 - DRDO DRDOdrdo.gov.in/drdo/pub/npc/2016/november/13Nov2016.pdf · bout the lo region; pho adequate to illegal entry ntent, which ans are forc. The Creek ... jawal
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
nSfud lkef;d vfHkKrk lsok
A Daily Current Awareness Service
lekpkj i=ksa ls pf;r va'kNewspapers Clippings
j{kk foKku iqLrdky;Defence Science Library
j{kk oSKkfud lwpuk ,oa Áy¢[ku d¢UæDefence Scientific Information & Documentation Centre
e m a r sh l o the highlaa man-snake hree monthsto be evacu
Followings on the laun
orists across ) on Septemas been on physical barsome 2,035 ia-Pakistan ncluding fenls flow to Pterritory anher, Pakistan
3 Nov, 2016
r between s a security
ar from the ntally cross
ing on the the natural a rat and ince. The ce (BSF) the 85-km-e all-terrain hat function eploy Creek s specially difficult to-
entire creek e high tide, nel to take
pur border y highland
andi snakes which are a n d , a l s nd, turning battlefield.
, two BSF uated after
g India's nch pads of the Line of
mber 29, the high alert.
rrier in this km of the border that ncing).Here akistan, re-
nd meander n has been
2
claiming Sir Creek, one of the five main creeks in the area, as its own, thereby turning this geography into a “disputed“ zone -this is the only border except Kashmir where lines on the maps differ from the actual demarcation on the ground.
Vigil by the Creek
After the 2611 attack -when Pakistani terrorists seized an Indian fishing boat not far from the creek area to venture into Mumbai -the strategic importance of the creeks has increased manifold. After the recent surgical strikes, there is a suspicion that Pakistani terrorists in the garb of fishermen, perhaps with covert support of their armed forces, might use a creek to stealthily enter the mainland of Gujarat. The city of Bhuj, for example, is about 160 km from the border and there are localities like Dayapar, Narayan Sarovar and Lakhpat that fall within 75 km of the border.
The BSF has not been taking any chances after the surgical strikes. On October 5, a week after the strikes, a single-engine, wooden fishing boat with nine Pakistani men was captured in Chauhan Nala, well in the Indian waters near border pillar G-43. Indian forces have seized 14 Pakistani fishing boats since January 2016, and many of the Pakistani “fishermen“ are in Indian jails.
“Now we have become much more vigilant. After all, there are thousands of fishing boats in the sea close to the IMBL (International Maritime Boundary Line), and they are not very far from the creeks. On the face of it, they seem to be fishermen, but you never know. They may have a different motive. Terrorists may enter in the garb of fishermen,“ says Ajay Kumar Tomar, BSF's inspector general of police and head of Gujarat frontier.
Tomar makes it clear that his forces on the ground don't acknowledge Pakistan's claim over Sir Creek, an issue which Islamabad took to the United Nations in the 1960s. “We are managing our border area with a very clear mind that India's boundary with Pakistan extends up to the midstream of Sir Creek,“ he clarifies. From the Indian side, Sir Creek -a 96-km-long estuary -is located in the northern most part of the creek area, the other creeks being Kori, Padala, Pabevari and Pir Sanai, on which India has undisputed control. Pakistani fishing boats, however, tend to enter Indian waters, in some cases lured by the prospect of a catch, disrupting normalcy in the region.
Pakistan cites a 1914 Bombay government verdict of a dispute between the Rao of the princely state of Kutch and the then chief commissioner of Sindh province, to claim the entire Sir Creek as its own; paragraph 10 of
ment trackingund targets; aound mode; pons solutiouses Braz. T
achieve this, pons systemugh a coded em in the Subringing AE
RAAF also espace infeser Hornet can
induction oftronic warfaraft would cr service, ththe US Nav
on US Navy
India, a decurity Memorhi has steadfMOA. Asketioning of Upted that wa
comply witrequirements
ow, ClaNavy is go
gressively indsive technolocers have B
m the Indian ring to join s“ achieved
eges. Conseqms will not brding high mction board)
e JEE (Mainernment apprJanuary 2018
the crucial canned arrayg enemy fighand a third p
or betweenons on the sThe game, he
the RAAF hms officer in
digital link ukhoi-30MKESA radars i
likes the Susted with enn do the refu
f the Growleare capabilityontrol the a
he F-35s. Brvy, for which
Super Horn
cision to burandum of Ufastly resisted whether A
US inspectoras essential.
th all the USs. It is in our
ass XII moing hi-techducted by thogical revoluTech degreNaval Acadthe force th
d in the all-quently , PCbe valid for marks in Clainterview or
n) ranks, whroving the m8 course at IN
differentiaty (AESA) rahters and dirpart jammingn different wsame aircrafe explains, is
has twin-sean the rear s
that connecKI, but withointo service,
uper Hornetnemy fighteruelling, exten
ers next year y. The RAA
aerial battle, raz is particuh the RAAF nets are imme
uy the SupeUnderstandined. The US Australia accrs on Austr
S requiremenr own interes
marks h with a vehe force, it wution under w
ees, apart frodemy in Kerhrough the 1-India joint
CM (physicsthis scheme
ass XII. We r training ver
hich the CBSmove, youngNA,“ he add
tor betweenadar — Rayrecting missig enemy senweapons sysft in seconds all about se
at Super Horneat engages
cts every eleout such an e
but the US
t’s capabilityrs, where annding the ran
is poised toAF’s E-7A W
datalinkingularly pleasepays a shareediately shar
er Hornet wg (CISMOAlaw require
cepted US sralian fighter
nts for safegust to do so,”
won't bngeance.Wit
wants “sea wway . First, om the tradirala. And no10+2 B Tech
entrance exs, chem istrye any longer
were findinry uneven,“
SE has agreegsters will haded.
6
n the Superytheon’s APiles onto the
nsors. “You ctems in the s. It is a ve
eeing the ene
nets, the pilos targets andement in the effective datstill enjoys a
y to mount n unarmed rnge of other
multiply theWedgetail a
g the Super Hed about thee. This ensurred with the
would involvA), an equipmes key elemsafeguards or bases, Gle
uarding sensFerguson sa
be consth state-of-t
warriors“ capthe Navy imitional milit
ow, it has beh cadet entrxam conducy the , mathr.“Different sng the qualitsaid a senio
ed to share ave to appea
r Hornet anG-79. This
em; another can switch iair-to-air m
ersatile and emy first and
ot in the frond exchangesbattle-space
ta link, or ana technologic
fuel tanks, arefueller airfighters in a
e Super Horairborne earlHornets, Gre Super Horres that avionRAAF.
ve signing thment securit
ments of the on CISMOAen Ferguson
sitive equipmaid.
sidered the-art warspable of handmplemented pary and leadeen decided ry scheme wcted for admhs) percentagstate examinty of candidr officer.
with us, wilar for the JE
nd other fiis a multi-tfocused on iinstantly betwmode. You c
highly efficd striking him
nt seat flyings data with e. The IAF un AESA radcal lead of a
and act as arcraft could a deep strike
rnets’ effectily warning arowlers, Posrnet’s “spiranics and har
he Communty agreement
data netwoA-protected en, Boeing’s
ment. In man
for entships, weapodling the intrplans to ensudership skillthat the sho
will be basedmission intoge obtained nation boarddates coming
ll be a betteE (Main) in
ghters is itasking radaridentifying aween air-to-can have foucient fightinm at long ran
g the aircrafother friend
uses a similadar. Other coa decade.
a mid-air refnot survive
e mission.
veness with and control eidons and,
al upgrade prdware upgra
nications Intt with the Urks to be prequipment, smaintenanc
ny cases, we
Sun, 13
try intoons and senricate challeure virtuallyls, when theort-listing ofd “only on Jo different ein the Class
ds have goneg for the SS
er benchmark2017 to be
ts airborne r, with one and striking -air and air-ur different ng system,” nges.
ft, while the dly aircraft ar two-pilot ountries are
fueller. In a e, an armed
formidable (AEW&C) when they
rogramme” ades carried
terface and US that New
rotected by such as the e manager,
e exceed the
3 Nov, 2016
o Navynsors being enges of the y all its new ey graduate f candidates JEE (Main) engineering s XII board e berserk in B (services
k. With the eligible for
As w2013
advapipel
The open
IndiaFridaexcepdepareneg
WhilMini
was earlier re3. Since then
anced techniline.
India
move markn the floodga
a has agreed ay. This has bption for Indiarture in Indgotiation wit
le the civiister Narend
eported by Tn, the Navy h
ical expertis
agrees
ks a significaates for rene
to link nuclebeen done throia – the deal wdia’s nucleath other coun
il nuclear dra Modi and
TOI, the firsthas been twe
se to handle
s to lin
ant departuregotiation w
ear testing witough a separawas the first Jar diplomacntries, with w
agreement d Japanese P
t direct-entryeaking the th
e the sophis
nk N-tewith
re in India’swith other co
th terminationate two-page Japan had signcy and therewhom Delhi
was publicM Shinzo A
7
y batch of Bhree officer e
sticated “pla
esting th Japa
nuclear dipountries, with
past.
n of the civil“note on viewned with a noe is apprehi has signed
cly signed Abe — betwe
BTech officerentry scheme
atforms“, we
to termn
plomacy andh whom Del
ian nuclear aws and underson-NPT signahension thatnuclear pact
on Friday een Foreign
rs passed oues.
First who ucourseNation(NDA)after exam These 78 commiwith Banothetraininthere who dwho dfor thprograUPSC every and la120 cshortliintervitheir Jthis hbecausstrong
eapon system
minatio
d there is applhi has signe
agreement thastanding” so atory. The mt it may opts in the past
— in theSecretary S
ut from the IN
are the naundergo the e at the nal Defence) at Kadakwclearing tand SSB cadets, whevery y
issioned aB Tech deer year ofng at the INare the aroirectly joint
directly joinhe four-yeaamme after
exams in twyear. Unde
argest schemcadets willsted for iew only on JEE (Mains)has become se the Nav
cadre of ofms and sen
Sun, 13
on of d
prehension ed nuclear p
at it signed wthat Japan coove marks a
pen the floot.
e presence Jaishankar a
NA in May
aval cadets three-year tri-service
e Academy wasla (Pune) the UPSC
interview. ho number
year, get as officers grees after
f intensive NA. Then, und cadets 110 cadets
nt the INA ar B Tech r clearing wo batches
er the third me, around l now be
the SSB the basis of
) ranks. All necessary
vy needs a fficers with
nsors in the
3 Nov, 2016
deal
that it may pacts in the
with Japan on ould make an a significant odgates for
of Prime and Japan’s
8
Ambassador to India, Kenji Hiramatsu, the two-page note, between India’s top nuclear negotiator Amandeep Singh Gill and his Japanese counterpart, was not announced. The Sunday Express has, however, seen both the Japanese and the English versions.
The note also has a clause that says that if Japan scraps the deal in the event of India conducting nuclear tests, India cannot claim compensation for disruption of electricity from a nuclear power plant and the consequent economic losses.
This substantive shift in India’s nuclear diplomacy comes eight years after India signed the 123 agreement with the US, a template it has stuck to ever since.
The two-page note has five clauses and begins by recalling then External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee’s statement to the Nuclear Suppliers’ Group in September 2008 and describes it as an “essential basis” for the deal. “The representative of the Japanese delegation stated that the Statement delivered by Pranab Mukherjee, then External Affairs Minister of India, on September 5, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the September 5 statement’), constitutes an essential basis for cooperation between the two States under the Agreement.”
Mukherjee’s statement, which has not been recorded in the two-page statement, had said, “We remain committed to a voluntary, unilateral moratorium on nuclear testing… We affirm our policy of no-first-use of nuclear weapons.”
Interestingly, this note and the agreement was signed a day after Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar’s controversial comments on the no-first-use policy, which he claimed was his “personal opinion”.
The second clause in the note says that in implementing the provisions of Article 14 of the deal, which deals with the termination and cessation of the agreement, Japan may exercise its rights and initiate the procedures “where there is any change in this basis”. The note goes on to say that the representative of the Japanese delegation stated that “an Indian action in violation of the September 5 statement could be viewed as a serious departure from the prevailing situation” – which is a clear reference to nuclear testing and no-first use. “In that situation, reprocessing of nuclear material subject to the agreement will be suspended in accordance with paragraph 9 of Article 14 of the Agreement”, it said.
Article 14 in the main text of the India-Japan deal makes no reference to the nuclear tests. Article 14(9) of the deal says any decision to seek ‘suspension’ will be taken after consultations between the two countries that will be aimed at reaching “mutually acceptable resolution of outstanding issues”. The suspension, it says, will be for three months.
“In case the suspension extends beyond a period of six months, both countries shall enter into consultations on compensation for the adverse impact on the Indian economy due to disruption in electricity generation and loss on account of disruption of contractual obligations,” it says.
However, in the additional note, the Japanese interlocutor has put in a caveat. “The representative of the Japanese delegation… stated that in such a situation, Japan reserves the right to contest India’s claim of compensation for the adverse impact on the Indian economy due to disruption in electricity generation and loss on account of disruption of contractual obligations,” the fourth clause in the note said.
What this means is that India cannot ask for any compensation owing to power disruption and loss of business.
While the Indian interlocutor, Amandeep Singh Gill, had reiterated Delhi’s commitment to Mukherjee’s statement of September 5, 2008, the deviation from the previous agreements, including the US and the French ones, is expected to raise eyebrows in Delhi.
“India went an extra mile for the Japanese government, since they have a very strong anti-nuclear lobby in the Diet. This is expected to facilitate the passage of the nuclear agreement in the Japanese parliament,” a government source said.
On Friday, Foreign Secretary Jaishankar had said that the agreement with Japan was “broadly in line with the agreements that India had done with other countries”. When asked about the termination clause, Jaishankar had said that the pact with Japan had a clause for ending the agreement, “which is quite similar to the US one”.
“I amthere
Comnucleis, berefusshow
In siNon-
But cond
AccoMinicivil
In thnuclethat aprevsuspsuspmora
Bind
Whenote the bsecreJapanbase
Indiaattac
AccoJapanvolunCom
Strik
At asimil
m not very ce is a striking
mmenting onear issues anecause in prse to providew its nuclear-
Tokyo
igning the c-Proliferatio
sources say duct nuclear
ording to ofister Narendian nuclear a
he additionaear negotiatoan Indian acailing situatended in accension of nuatorium on n
ding provisi
en contacted actually wa
bilateral agretary Yasuhn will give nd on the trea
a also undersched to the T
ording to ofn’s cooperatntary morato
mprehensive N
king similar
a press conliarities” in
clear about g similarity,”
n the terminnd South Asractice, whate maintenanc-allergic nati
Ind
o wants New
ivil nuclear on Treaty (NP
India, too, mtests in orde
fficials, whildra Modi andagreement o
l document,ors after the ction in violation. In thatcordance wiuclear parts onuclear testin
ions
by The Hinas. A senior Mreement (NCisa Kawamunotice notify
aty.
stands this, wTreaty,” he sa
fficials presetion with Indorium on nuNuclear-Tes
rities
nference in the Japan d
releasing th” he had said
nation clausesia, told Thet can you doce service knion has sent
ia, Jap
w Delhi to ma
agreement wPT), based o
may have gier to bag the
le the Nucled Prime Minf 2008, a tex
, called the meeting, Ar
ation of the St situation, th paragraphor fuel supplng made for
ndu, Indian aMEA officia
CA).” Howeura said Japy India of it
which is conaid.
ent at the bildia was “on uclear test,” st-Ban Treaty
Tokyo on deal with tho
he status of td.
e, Takako He Indian Expo? Can you nowing it mian importan
pan difBy Su
aintain its c
with India, on India’s im
iven exceptideal.
ear Cooperanister Shinzoxt signed in a
“Note on Vrticle I (iii) sSeptember 5reprocessing
h 9 of Articlly. (The refethe Nuclear
and Japaneseal privy to thver, in writt
pan had madts intension
nfirmed in th
lateral meetthe premiseand urged I
y (CTBT), th
Friday, Foose of other
9
the agreeme
Hirose, profepress, “I am
take back tight lead to nt message to
ffer onuhasini Hai
commitment
Japan madempeccable nu
ional commi
ation Agreemo Abe on Friaddition to it
Views and Usays: “The r
5 statement cg of nucleale 14 of the rence to the Suppliers G
e officials sehe negotiatioten replies tde its intentof terminati
he official do
tings in Toke that India mIndia to signhat India has
oreign Secrer countries.
ent. But whe
fessor at Sennot sure how
the reactor ya disaster? Bo India.”
nucleaidar
to voluntary
e a major exuclear record
itments on i
ment (NCA)day followet is a departu
Understandinrepresentativcould be viewar material sAgreement,”‘September
Group in 200
eemed to dions said that to The Hindtions clear. “ion of the tre
ocument, “N
kyo, Mr. Abemaintains itsn the Non- Ps resisted for
etary S.JaishHowever, fo
en it is relea
nshu Univerw important
you have supBut the Japan
ar test
y unilateral
xception for d.
its nuclear so
) signed in d the templaure from the
ng” signed bve of the Japwed as a serisubject to th” invoking a
r 5’ statemen8.)
ffer on howthe only “bi
du, Japan’s F“[If India coeaty and wil
Note on View
e went furths commitmeProliferationr decades.
hankar saidformer nucle
ased, you wi
rsity and ant the terminapplied? Hownese governm
Sun, 13
ts
moratorium
a non-signa
overeignty a
the presencate set in the past.
by Indian anpanese delegaious departuhe Agreemea section on nt was India’
w binding theinding proviForeign Minonducts a nll cease its c
ws and Unde
her, saying fent to the unn Treaty (NP
d there werear envoys s
ill find that
n expert on ation clause w? Can you ment has to
3 Nov, 2016
m
atory to the
and right to
ce of Prime e India-U.S.
nd Japanese ation stated
ure from the ent will be emergency
’s voluntary
e additional sions are in nistry Press uclear test] cooperation
erstanding”,
frankly that nilateral and PT) and the
re “striking say the text
signirejecAust
Nextshutdcrucinegocomp
FinanucleadvedisruAgre
The givendebaof foObam
Ind
The linesstraigsigna
The partidiscoacco1945
Yearcounreach
Of cof thbecawith
Undeif Innucleproliclose
ifies India hcted direct rtralia, among
t, India has down of its nial part of
otiation withpanies Hitac
lly, the addiear cooperat
erse impact uption of coneement,” rea
difference inn that the Ja
ate over nucloreign supplima in Januar
dia now bec
geostrategics of the Indightjacket anatory to the n
warming of icular intensourse in the unt of its str
5 (at the hand
rs of engagenterpart Shinhed an agree
ourse, this ishe wider diause, among
the Japanes
er this pact, ndia tests nuear discussioiferation recer strategic b
has gone “mreferences togst a dozen c
allowed Japnuclear powall future r
h India at prchi, Toshiba
tional note stion with Inon the Indi
ntractual oblads Article I(
n perceptionapanese Parllear sovereigiers in the Inry 2015.
Indiacomes the on
c map of Asiia-US agreem
nd engage in nuclear non-
f India’s ties ity under PMpost-Soviet
rong pacifistds of the US
ement bore nzo Abe on ement to tran
s strictly forscussion onother reason
se firm Hitac
as in the casuclear weapoon with Japaord, which
bonding betw
much furthero nuclear tecountries Ind
pan to incluwer capabilitireactors in Iresent: GE, and Mitsubi
states that Jandia. “Japanian economyligations thro(iv) of the do
ns between tliament, Diegnty will be kndia-U.S. ci
a and Jnly non-NPT
ia changed oment conclutrade in nuc
-proliferation
with Japan M Manmohperiod, but
t record sincS).
fruit with Friday. Ind
nsfer nuclear
r the peacefun climate chns, the Westichi. That roa
se with the cons. But thian dating bacought to be
ween the two
r” in commiests as a trigdia has signe
ude the “emies given thaIndia. With Westinghou
ishi.
apan can conn reserves thy due to disough the conocument, ava
the MEA anet, is yet to akey, akin to vil nuclear a
Japan fT signatory w
nucle
on Friday wituded in 200clear materian treaty (NP
since the dahan Singh, h
Tokyo had e Japan is th
Prime Minidia now becr supplies.
ul uses of nuhange. Indiainghouse readblock has n
civil nuclear s assurance ck to 2010. Tthe envy of
o countries.
10
itments to Jgger for caned nuclear ag
mergency suat Japanese c
the exceptuse and Are
ntest the claihe right to csruption in nsultations pailable on th
nd Ministry oapprove the the criticism
agreement re
forge swith which Jear supplies.
th Japan and8, which haals — such aT), which In
ays of Primehelped lay ou
remained firhe world’s on
ister Narendomes the on
uclear energya’s agreemenactors that thnow been rem
compact wihad long b
Tokyo has alf NPT count
Japan than encelling the greements w
spension” ccompanies ation of Russeva have co
ms by Indiacontest Indiaelectricity g
provided for he Japanese F
of Foreign ANuclear coo
m the governesolution be
strategJapan has r.
d India signinad permittedas reactors andia has long
e Minister Aut the straterm on not senly country
dra Modi innly non-NPT
y and for clent with the he US wouldmoved.
th America, been supplielso long beentries. What’
ever before. deal from
with.
lause, whichand spare parsian reactornsiderable o
a for compena’s claim ofgeneration ain paragrap
Foreign Min
Affairs in Japoperation A
nment faced etween PM M
gic bonreached an a
ng a civil nud India to brand nuclear fg held to be d
Atal Behari Vegic dimensielling nucleato have suff
n Tokyo inkT signatory
ean power geUS had re
d supply wer
Japan can teed by New Dn aware of Is turned the
In the pastthe U.S., C
h could merts are expec
rs, all the sownership b
nsation if it sf compensatand loss on h 9 of Articl
nistry website
pan will be greement. Inover curtaili
Modi and U
Sun, 13
nds agreement to
uclear agreemreak out of fuel — withdiscriminato
Vajpayee, whions of the Iar materials fered a nucle
king the deawith which
eneration in mained nonre built in co
erminate theDelhi right ndia’s impec
e discussion
, India had Canada, and
an a major cted to be a suppliers in by Japanese
suspends its tion for the account of le 14 of the e.
significant, n India, the ing liability S President
3 Nov, 2016
o transfer
ment on the the nuclear
hout being a ory.
hich gained India-Japan to India on
ear attack in
al with his h Japan has
the contextn-functional ollaboration
e agreement through its ccable non-now is the
It apforceincluand t
BefoJapannot tpartn
Afterup pconfiMini
“Mr.Engiinves
The violein thmet militDepuMarc
Milit
The Meh
Ukraplatftwo-
The visit
ppears evideneful, thrustinuded — is thtaking defen
ore Mr Modin on China’to forge straners indirectl
r a gap of fopolitical, mifirmed that Fister Anant G
. Geete, wineering Corstment and i
visit of theence in eastehe region. Th
Prime Minitary ties wituty Secretarych 28-31 “D
tary moder
diplomat sahta who was
aine’s diplomforms. Ukraiyear term at
diplomat inof Mr. Klim
nt that the Inng manner, whe elephant insive action.
i landed in s hectoring a
ategic links wly ticked off
India
our years, Indilitary and dForeign MinGeete undert
ho was acrporation Ltindustrial coo
e Indian Minern Ukraine.he last majoister Manmoth Pakistan. y of the Cou
DefExpo-Indi
nisation
aid the ongoiin Kyiv in Ju
matic importine is a memt the U.N. Se
ndicated thatmkin is likely
ndia-Japan awhich has rain the room f
Tokyo, Beijattitude in thwith Tokyof China for n
a and U
dia and Ukradiplomatic nister Pavlotook a visit t
companied td., Hindustaoperation,” t
nister break India had er visit from ohan Singh Despite the
uncil for Natiia 2016” in G
ing round ofune.
tance had bember of the ecurity Coun
Ukraine is y to take up s
agreement haaised concernfor both cou
ing let it behe South Chi. This has n
not doing eno
UkrainBy Kal
aine are set tties. Speaki Klimkin isto the countr
by represean Machine the diplomat
ks a gap in evacuated cit
Ukraine wain 2012. H
e hurdles, anional SecuriGoa.
f exchanges
een growing Nuclear Su
ncil.
interested inseveral key p
11
as come witns all round
untries, and N
e known thaina Sea wounot worked. ough to cont
ne to clllol Bhattach
to begin a neing to The Hs likely to vry last week.
entatives of Tools, held
t said.
bilateral extizens from
as by PresideHowever, anon initial dialty and Defen
were explor
also due to uppliers Grou
n supportingprojects in a
th the undersd in China’s New Delhi a
at a commonuld hurt India
Indeed, as ttain cross-bo
lose gaherjee
ew phase of Hindu , sen
visit India so
f Bharat Hed widerangin
changes thaUkraine in 2ent Viktor Yother problelogue was hnce met with
red during t
the rising pup (NSG) a
g India’s miaviation and
standing thaneighbourho
and Tokyo a
n understanda — a veiledthe joint staorder terroris
ap in ti
f exchanges wnior Ukrainioon even as
eavy Electrng talks cov
at had forme2014 as the
Yanukovych em in bilateheld in Juneh senior offic
the visit of S
rofile of theand a non-pe
ilitary modespace resear
at the rise ofood — Japanre seeking to
ding betweend warning to atement showsm in South
Sun, 13
ies
which is likeian diplomas the Heavy
ricals Limitvering trade,
ed due to thdisturbancewho visited
eral ties wase when Ukracials on the
Secretary (W
country in mermanent me
rnisation plarch.
f China in a n and India o cooperate
n India and New Delhi
ws, the two Asia.
3 Nov, 2016
ely to warm atic sources y Industries
ted, Heavy economic,
he ongoing e intensified d Delhi and s Ukraine’s aine’s First sidelines of