Sung-Ho Joh Department of Civil Engineering Chung-Ang University Surface Wave Techniques to Evaluate Subsurface Stiffness Structure Nov. 17, 2015 Spectral-Analysis-of-Surface- Waves (SASW) Method 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Location, m -10 -5 0 Depth, m
Sung-Ho Joh
Department of Civil EngineeringChung-Ang University
Surface Wave Techniques to Evaluate Subsurface Stiffness Structure
Nov. 17, 2015
Spectral-Analysis-of-Surface-Waves (SASW) Method
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35Location, m
-10
-5
0
Dept
h, m
2
Principles and Concepts of the SASW Method
3
Setup for SASW Measurements
DR
Dynamic Signal Analyzerwith anti-aliasing filter Frequency Span: 25~52000 Hz Real-time FFT 2 to 4 input channels
Geophones4.5 Hz (for D=0.5~1m)1.0 Hz (for D ≥ 2m)Shielded Cables
Impact SourceAssorted Hammers 100-kg Drop WeightBulldozer
Inter-Receiver Spacings0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0 m (for Hammers)16.0, 32.0 m (for 100-kg Drop Weight)64.0, 128.0 m (for Bulldozer)
Source-Receiver DistanceR=D (Conventional SASW)R=1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 D
(for CAP-SASW)
4
FFT Analyzer Seismic Sources
Geophones
5
Principles of Phase-Velocity Measurement
360sec 01504.0t
Frequency = 66.48 HzPeriod = 0.01504 sec
phase difference:travel time:
ft
2
Relationship between and t :
2 m
m/sec 0.13301504.0
0.2
tDvphPhase Velocity:
fDvph
2
Receiver 1
Receiver 2
6
Receiver 1
3
2
1
0Spec
tral A
mpl
itude
8006004002000
Frequency, Hz
D D
2000
1000
0U
nwra
pped
Pha
se, d
eg
8006004002000Frequency, Hz
Spec
tral A
mpl
itude 3
2
1
0 8006004002000Frequency, Hz
FFT
Phase Difference :
2 – 1
600
400
200
0
Phas
e Ve
l., m
/sec
1 10 100Wavelength, m
ExperimentalDispersion Curve
Receiver 2
FFT
-150-100-50
050
100150
Phas
e An
gle,
deg
8006004002000Frequency, Hz
Phase Unwrapping
(a)
(b)
(c)
Impact, Swept Sinusoidal Vibration, orRandom Noise
D=1m
Phase-Velocity Determination in SASW Method
7
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
Phas
e An
gle,
deg
8006004002000
Frequency, Hz
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
Phas
e An
gle,
deg
4003002001000
Frequency, Hz
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
Phas
e An
gle,
deg
200150100500
Frequency, Hz
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
Phas
e An
gle,
deg
100806040200
Frequency, Hz
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
Phas
e An
gle,
deg
50403020100
Frequency, Hz
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
Phas
e An
gle,
deg
2520151050
Frequency, Hz
800
600
400
200
0
Phas
e Ve
loci
ty, m
/sec
3 4 5 6 71
2 3 4 5 6 710
2 3 4 5 6 7100
2 3
Wavelength, m
D = 1m
D = 2m
D = 4m
D = 8m
D = 16m
D = 32m
25
20
15
10
5
0
Dep
th, m
8006004002000Shear Wave Velocity, m/sec
InversionAnalysis
CompositeExperimental Dispersion Curve
Inversion Analysis in the SASW Method
8
Global Average Dispersion Curve
Wavelength, ft1 10 100
Phas
e Ve
loci
ty, f
t/sec
0
500
1000
15005 ft10 ft20 ft40 ft80 ftAverage
Composite
Dispersion Curve for Global Inversion Analysis
Theoretical vs. Global Average Dispersion Curve
Wavelength, ft1 10 100
Phas
e Ve
loci
ty, f
t/sec
0
500
1000
1500AverageTheoretical
Dispersion Curve for Array Inversion Analysis
Array Average Dispersion Curves
Wavelength, ft1 10 100
Phas
e Ve
loci
ty, f
t/sec
0
500
1000
1500Composite5 ft10 ft20 ft40 ft80 ft
Wavelength, ft1 10 100
Phas
e Ve
loci
ty, f
t/sec
0
500
1000
1500
5 ft10 ft20 ft40 ft80 ft
5 ft10 ft20 ft40 ft80 ft
Average Theo ret ical
Theoretical vs. Global Average Dispersion Curve
Inversion Analysis for the SASW Method: Global and Array Inversion Analyses
9
Shear Wave Velocity, ft/sec
0 500 1000 1500
Dep
th, f
t
0
10
20
30
Starting ModelFinal ModelExact
Shear Wave Velocity, ft/sec0 500 1000 1500
Dep
th, f
t
0
10
20
30
Starting ModelFinal ModelExact
Global Inversion Array Inversion
Inverted Shear-wave Velocity Profiles
10
Impulse Response Filtration (IRF) Technique Random Noise Added to the Theoretically Determined Displacements
Time, sec0.0 0.5 1.0
Time, sec0.0 0.5 1.0
Impulse Response
Frequency, Hz0 10 20 30 40 50
-180
0
180
Phas
e An
gle,d
eg
10 20 30 40 50Frequency, Hz
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
-72
-62
-52
-42
-32
-22
Tim
e, s
ec0
11
Comparison of the Original and IRF-Enhanced Phase Spectra
Frequency, Hz0 10 20 30 40 50Ph
ase
Angl
e,de
g
-180-90
090
180
Time, sec0.0 0.5 1.0
Frequency, Hz0 10 20 30 40 50
Phas
e An
gle,
deg
-180
0
180
OriginalIRF-Enhanced
10 20 30 40 50
Frequency, Hz
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
-72
-62
-52
-42
-32
-22
Tim
e, s
ec0
12
WinSASW, Dedicated Software for the SASW Method
13
D=(1,2,4,8,16,32) m
1 2
S=D
Receivers100 kg
Far SourceNearSource (5 kg)
D=2~4 m
1 2
S=(1,2,4,8,16)D
ReceiversNear SourceFar Source100 kg (5 kg)
Recent Development in the SASW Method
Common-Mid-Point (CMP) SASW Method
Common-Array-Profiling (CAP) SASW Method
CL
14
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Pha
se V
eloc
ity, m
/sec
0.1 1 10 100 1000Wavelength, m
(c) Case C
1000
800
600
400
200Pha
se V
eloc
ity, m
/sec
(b) Case B
1000
800
600
400
200Pha
se V
eloc
ity, m
/sec
CAP SASW2 m4 m8 m16 m32 m64 m128 m
(a) Case ACMP SASW1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128 m
Normal ModesSource Not Specified
[Source Offset]
40
30
20
10
0
Dep
th, m
4002000VS, m/sec
40
30
20
10
0
Dep
th, m
4002000VS, m/sec
40
30
20
10
0
Dep
th, m
4002000VS, m/sec
Shear-WaveVelocity Profile Phase-Velocity Dispersion Curve
CMP SASW Method vs. CAP SASW Method
15
D=3 m
1 2
S=3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 m
ReceiversNear SourceFar Source
40
30
20
10
0
Dep
th, m
25000Vs., m/sec
0
5
10
15500 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Location, m
Dep
th, m
55
Evaluation of 2-D Shear-Wave Velocity Profiles
CAP SASW Method
(100kg) (5kg)
16
12
2 m
1 2 11
Receivers
0
5
10
1550 550 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Location, m
Dep
th, m
40
30
20
10
0
Dep
th, m
20000Vs., m/sec
MASW Method
(5kg)(5kg)
Near SourceFarr Source
17
SASW Method for Deep Profiling
Low-frequency vibroseis, 64,000 lb-heavy Liquidator
Typical time histories of a vibroseis source 250
200
150
100
50
0
Dep
th, m
2000150010005000Shear-Wave Velocity, m/s
250
200
150
100
50
0
-Wave Velocity, m/sec
Mean16th and 84th PercentileMean16th and 84th Percentile
18
Applications of the SASW Method
19
Applications of the SASW Method
Geotechnical Sites Pavement Systems Concrete Structures
• NDE of asphalt pavements• Modulus and thickness of
pavement layer, subgrade and grade
• Evaluation of Compaction Quality• Site Investigation of
- MSW Landfill- Road bed or Railroad bed
• Evaluation of Vacuum Consolidation• Shear-Wave Velocity Profile for
Seismic Analysis
• Structural Integrity test of- Tunnel Concrete Lining- Concrete Bridge Deck- Retaining Wall
20
• Compaction by Hydraulic Hammer:
Runway of Inchon International Airport
Quality Assurance of Compaction
21
Comparison of Shear-Wave Velocity before and after Compaction
Shear Wave Velocity, m/sec
0 200 400 600 800
Dep
th, m
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
BeforeAfter
Shear Wave Velocity, m/sec
0 100 200 3000
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
BeforeAfter
22
• Stiffness Profiling of Engineering Fill
Treasure Island in San Francisco
Site Investigation at Man-Made Island
23
00 500 1000 1500
Dep
th, f
t50
100
150
Shear Wave Velocity, m/sec
SASW (Array Inversion)Crosshole (UT)
Comparison of Shear-Wave Velocity Profiles from SASW and Crosshole Tests
24
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Dep
th, f
t
150010005000
Shear Wave Velocity, ft/sec
SASW OYO Suspension
Logging
• Vs Profiling of OII Landfill at LA, USA:
Comparison between SASW Results and Results ofOYO Suspension Logging
Site Investigation of MSW Landfill Site
25
• Vs Profiling of Ballast and Railroad Bed to Investigate Mud Pumping
Stiffness Profiling of Ballast and Railroad Bed
26
Shear-Wave Velocity Profiles from Inversion Analyses
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Dep
th, m
5004003002001000Shear Wave Velocity, m/sec
철도 레일 직하 철도 노견
27
Vs Profiling of Asphalt Pavement System
28
Vs Profiles from SASW Tests
Comparison between Results of SASW Testsand CPT
5
4
3
2
1
0
Dep
th, m
25002000150010005000
Shear Wave Velocity from SASW, m/sec
25002000150010005000
Sleeve Friction from CPT, kPa
CPT on Soil SASW on Soil SASW on Asphalt
5
4
3
2
1
0
Dep
th, m
5004003002001000
Shear Wave Velocity from SASW, m/sec
5004003002001000
Sleeve Friction from CPT, kPa
CPT on Soil SASW on Soil
29
Wavelength, ft
.1 1 10 100
Phas
e Ve
locit
y, ft
/sec
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
Wavelength, ft
.1 1 10 100
Phas
e Ve
locit
y, ft
/sec
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
Before Tunneling
JFK Airport, New York
After Tunneling
Soil Layer under Runway
Stiffness Evaluation of Soil Layers under Airport Runway
30
Experimental DataBest-Fit Curve
200
400
600
800
1000
Surfa
ce W
ave
Vel
ocity
(fps
)
10 40Wavelength (ft)
200
400
600
800
1000
10
Wavelength (ft)
40
Surfa
ce W
ave
Vel
ocity
(fps
)
Experimental DataBest-Fit Curve
Before Tunneling
Experimental Dispersion Curve for Runway of JFK Airport (Expanded for Long Wavelengths)
After Tunneling
31
• NDE for Tunnel Concrete Lining:
Road Tunnel
Investigation for Tunnel Concrete Lining (1)
32
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0D
epth
, m
500040003000200010000
Shear Wave Velocity, m
Concrete Lining
Water-Proofing Membrane
Shotcrete and Original MaterialNot much reliable
1-D Shear Wave Velocity Profile
33
1-D Phase Velocity profile in Wavelength-Distance Domain
:추정된방수막위치
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Wav
elen
gth,
m
3.02.52.01.51.00.50.0
Distance, m
2-D Stiffness Profile
34
:추정된방수막위치
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Dep
th, m
3.02.52.01.51.00.50.0
Distance, m
2-D Shear-Wave Velocity Profile of Tunnel Concrete Lining in Depth-Distance Domain
35
ConcreteLiner
Grout
Rock
tconcrete
tgrout
ConcreteLiner
Grout
Rock
tconcrete
tgrout
Rock
Grout
LinerReceivers
HammerSource
SASWArray Axes
“Crown” InvestigationPlane
SpringlineInvestigationPlane
Rock
Grout
LinerReceivers
HammerSource
SASWArray Axes
“Crown” InvestigationPlane
SpringlineInvestigationPlane
(a) Generalized Tunnel Cross Section
SASW testing performed inside a concrete-lined tunnel (from Stokoe and Santamarina, 2000)
(b) SASW Testing Arrangement and Planes of Investigation
Shear Wave Velocity, VS , m/sec
Station 1(Springline)
concrete liner(thickness ~ 35 cm)
rock behind liner stiffer than concrete
0
2
4
6
80 1000 2000 3000
Dep
th, m
4000Shear Wave Velocity, VS , m/sec
Station 1(Springline)
concrete liner(thickness ~ 35 cm)
rock behind liner stiffer than concrete
0
2
4
6
80 1000 2000 3000
Dep
th, m
4000
concrete liner(thickness >40 cm)
grout(good stiffness
and thickness > 30 cm)
Rock behind liner softer than concrete
Station 2 (Crown)
{{
0
4
80 1000 2000 3000
Shear Wave Velocity, m/sec
Dep
th, m
6
2
concrete liner(thickness >40 cm)
grout(good stiffness
and thickness > 30 cm)
Rock behind liner softer than concrete
Station 2 (Crown)
{{
0
4
80 1000 2000 3000
Shear Wave Velocity, m/sec
Dep
th, m
6
2
(a) Interpreted Vs profile at a springline station
Examples of Vs profiles measured inside a concrete-lined tunnel (from Stoke and Santamarina, 2000)
(b) Interpreted Vs profile at a “crown” station
Investigation for Tunnel Concrete Lining (2)
36
(a) Generalized Tunnel Cross Section (b) SASW Testing Arrangement and Planes of Investigation
RockGrout
LinerReceivers
HammerSource
SASWArray Axes
“Crown” InvestigationPlane
SpringlineInvestigationPlane
RockGrout
LinerReceivers
HammerSource
SASWArray AxesConcrete
Liner
Grout
Rock
tconcrete
tgrout
Rock
tconcrete
tgrout
(b) Interpreted Vs profile at a springline station (b) Interpreted Vs profile at a “crown” station
Examples of Vs profiles measured inside a concrete-lined tunnel (from Stoke and Santamarina, 2000)
Shear Wave Velocity, m/sec
Station 1(Springline)
concrete liner(thickness ~ 35 cm)
rock behind liner stiffer than concrete
0
2
4
6
80 1000 2000 3000
Dep
th, m
4000
( )
concrete liner(thickness ~ 35 cm)
rock behind liner stiffer than concrete
0
2
4
6
80 1000 2000 3000
Dep
th, m
4000
concrete liner(thickness > 40cm)
grout(good stiffness
and thickness > 30 cm)
Rock behind liner softer than concrete
Station 2 (Crown)
0
4
80 1000 2000 3000
Shear Wave Velocity, m/sec
6
2
0
4
80 1000 2000 3000
Shear Wave Velocity, m/sec
6
2
Dep
th, m
37
Dep
th, m
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Dep
th, m
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Dep
th, m
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.2095.1C95.1C 95.1N95.1N 94.4S94.4S 94.4C94.4C 94.4N94.4N 94.3S94.3S 94.3C94.3C 94.3N94.3N
57.3S 57.3C 57.3N 57.2S 57.2C 57.2N 57.1S 57.1C 57.1N57.3S57.3S 57.3C57.3C 57.3N57.3N 57.2S57.2S 57.2C57.2C 57.2N57.2N 57.1S57.1S 57.1C57.1C 57.1N57.1N
Concrete Slab ID
Defects Small Modulus
Good Material Large Modulus
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Dep
th, m
500040003000200010000Shear-Wave Velocity, m/sec
P.Section 94.4(Row 5) 57.2(Row 5) 57.2(Row 3)
Investigation of Surface Cracks in Concrete Runway
38
4.0m
2.0mMeasurement ArrayFor Tomograhpy
Investigation of Damanaged Area after Explosion
39
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
Wav
elen
gth,
m
Wav
elen
gth,
m
Distance from Cliff, m2 3 4 5 6
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
2 3 4 5 6
Surface-WaveVel. m/sec
Distance from Cliff, m
Before Explosion After Explosion
40
Thank you for your attention!
감사합니다.